Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 1982 Apr 15;204(1):185–189. doi: 10.1042/bj2040185

Discrimination in the metabolism of orally dosed ergocalciferol and cholecalciferol by the pig, rat and chick.

R L Horst, J L Napoli, E T Littledike
PMCID: PMC1158331  PMID: 6288012

Abstract

Vitamin D-deficient pigs, rats and chicks were repleted with four daily oral doses of crystalline ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) and cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) containing equal concentrations of each. At 24 h after the last dose, the plasma of each species was analysed for vitamin D and 25-hydroxyvitamin D by standard methods. The mean (+/- S.D.) ratios of plasma cholecalciferol to ergocalciferol concentration were 1.5 +/- 0.1 (pig). 1.7 +/- 0.1 (rat) and 6.3 +/- 1.2 (chick). The mean ratios of plasma 25-hydroxycholecalciferol to 25-hydroxyergocalciferol concentration were 4.0 +/- 0.1 (pig), 0.4 +/- 0.02 (rat) and 10.7 +/- 3.4 (chick). The mean plasma cholecalciferol/ergocalciferol ratios for the 24,25-dihydroxy-, 25,26-dihydroxy- and 1,25-dihydroxy-derivatives in the pig were 2.6 +/- 0.6, 5.8 +/- 1.3 and 5.8 +/- 0.8 respectively. This is the first evidence that mammals other than the New World monkey, like birds, discriminate between ergocalciferol and cholecalciferol. These data, therefore, suggest that species discrimination between the different forms of vitamin D is probably a general phenomenon in mammals. Moreover, this is the first indication of a species (rat) that discriminates against a cholecalciferol metabolite in favour of an ergocalciferol metabolite. Species discrimination against particular forms of vitamin D may be important to the choice of experimental animal models for studying the regulation of vitamin D metabolism and may also be an important consideration in dietary vitamin supplementation.

Full text

PDF
185

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barton D. H., Patin H. Chemistry of the tricarbonyliron complexes of calciferol and ergosterol. J Chem Soc Perkin 1. 1976;(8):829–831. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CHEN P. S., Jr, BOSMANN H. B. EFFECT OF VITAMINS D2 AND D3 ON SERUM CALCIUM AND PHOSPHORUS IN RACHITIC CHICKS. J Nutr. 1964 Jun;83:133–139. doi: 10.1093/jn/83.2.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Drescher D., Deluca H. F., Imrie M. H. On the site of discrimination of chicks against vitamin D. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1969 Mar;130(1):657–661. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(69)90084-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Horst R. L., Shepard R. M., Jorgensen N. A., DeLuca H. F. The determination of the vitamin D metabolites on a single plasma sample: changes during parturition in dairy cows. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1979 Feb;192(2):512–523. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(79)90121-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hunt R. D., Garcia F. G., Hegsted D. M. A comparison of vitamin D2 and D3 in New World primates. I. Production and regression of osteodystrophia fibrosa. Lab Anim Care. 1967 Apr;17(2):222–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jones G., Byrnes B., Palma F., Segev D., Mazur Y. Displacement potency of vitamin D2 analogs in competitive protein-binding assays for 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1980 Apr;50(4):773–775. doi: 10.1210/jcem-50-4-773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jones G., Schnoes H. K., DeLuca H. F. Isolation and identification of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D2. Biochemistry. 1975 Mar 25;14(6):1250–1256. doi: 10.1021/bi00677a025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Knutson J. C., DeLuca H. F. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3-24-hydroxylase. Subcellular location and properties. Biochemistry. 1974 Mar 26;13(7):1543–1548. doi: 10.1021/bi00704a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MILLER E. R., ULLREY D. E., ZUTAUT C. L., BALTZER B. V., SCHMIDT D. A., VINCENT B. H., HOEFER J. A., LUECKE R. W. VITAMIN D2 REQUIREMENT OF THE BABY PIG. J Nutr. 1964 Jun;83:140–148. doi: 10.1093/jn/83.2.140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Napoli J. L., Fivizzani M. A., Schnoes H. K., DeLuca H. F. Synthesis of vitamin D5: its biological activity relative to vitamins D3 and D2. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1979 Oct 1;197(1):119–125. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(79)90226-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. ROBORGH J. R., de MAN T. The hypercalcemic activity of dihydrotachysterol-2 and dihydrotachysterol-3 and of the vitamins D2 and D3 after intravenous injection of the aqueous preparations. 2. Comparative experiments on rats. Biochem Pharmacol. 1960 Jul;3:277–282. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(60)90092-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Suda T., DeLuca H. F., Tanaka Y. Biological activity of 25-hydroxyergocalciferol in rats. J Nutr. 1970 Sep;100(9):1049–1052. doi: 10.1093/jn/100.9.1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES