Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1996 Mar 1;491(Pt 2):551–562. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021239

Selective facilitation of responses to cortical stimulation of proximal and distal arm muscles by precision tasks in man.

M Schieppati 1, C Trompetto 1, G Abbruzzese 1
PMCID: PMC1158749  PMID: 8866878

Abstract

1. The responses of the first dorsal interosseus (1DI), opponens pollicis (OP), extensor digitorum communis (EDC), brachioradialis (BR), biceps brachii (BB) and anterior deltoid (AD) muscles to magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex were recorded during different motor tasks. 2. Two precision and two power isometric tasks were investigated. The precision tasks were a pincer grip ('grip') and a thrust against a target with the wrist ('push'). In the former, the prime movers were the intrinsic hand muscles, while the proximal muscles played a postural role. In the latter, the prime movers were the proximal muscles. In both tasks, force was controlled through visual feedback. The power tasks required encirclement of a cylinder with the fingers ('grasp'), or sustaining a weight suspended at wrist level ('load'). 3. Magnetic stimulation was applied in eight subjects by a coil placed over the vertex at 1.1-1.2 times the motor threshold for the most excitable muscles. This produced in the prime mover muscles larger motor-evoked responses (MEPs) during grip or push tasks than grasp or load tasks, in spite of similar background EMG levels. During grip tasks, only one of the two prime movers showed task-dependent changes. In the postural muscle AD there was no significant difference between MEPs during grip and grasp tasks; however, BB responses were larger during grasp than grip tasks. 4. MEPs simultaneously recorded in the prime movers were plotted against each other. The slope of the regression line for AD versus BB was larger in push than load tasks, whilst the changes in MEPs of 1DI and OP were independent during both grip and grasp tasks. 5. In three subjects, MEPs were also elicited by electrical stimulation during grip and grasp tasks. MEP changes tended to parallel those obtained for magnetic stimulation, but the increase in size of the electrically evoked MEPs during the precision task was smaller. 6. In all subjects the median and ulnar nerves were stimulated during grip and grasp tasks, and an H reflex was evoked in the hand muscles of five subjects. In no case did the two tasks produce reflexes of different amplitude. 7. The motor response of both proximal and distal muscles can be task dependent, in spite of the differences in their principal functional role and cortical representation. The modulation is related to the degree of control requested by the task, and is likely to reflect selective changes in the excitability of corticospinal neurones.

Full text

PDF
551

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abbruzzese G., Morena M., Spadavecchia L., Schieppati M. Response of arm flexor muscles to magnetic and electrical brain stimulation during shortening and lengthening tasks in man. J Physiol. 1994 Dec 1;481(Pt 2):499–507. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burke D., Gracies J. M., Mazevet D., Meunier S., Pierrot-Deseilligny E. Non-monosynaptic transmission of the cortical command for voluntary movement in man. J Physiol. 1994 Oct 1;480(Pt 1):191–202. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burke D., Hicks R., Gandevia S. C., Stephen J., Woodforth I., Crawford M. Direct comparison of corticospinal volleys in human subjects to transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation. J Physiol. 1993 Oct;470:383–393. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burke D., Hicks R., Stephen J. Anodal and cathodal stimulation of the upper-limb area of the human motor cortex. Brain. 1992 Oct;115(Pt 5):1497–1508. doi: 10.1093/brain/115.5.1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Colebatch J. G., Gandevia S. C. The distribution of muscular weakness in upper motor neuron lesions affecting the arm. Brain. 1989 Jun;112(Pt 3):749–763. doi: 10.1093/brain/112.3.749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Colebatch J. G., Rothwell J. C., Day B. L., Thompson P. D., Marsden C. D. Cortical outflow to proximal arm muscles in man. Brain. 1990 Dec;113(Pt 6):1843–1856. doi: 10.1093/brain/113.6.1843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Datta A. K., Harrison L. M., Stephens J. A. Task-dependent changes in the size of response to magnetic brain stimulation in human first dorsal interosseous muscle. J Physiol. 1989 Nov;418:13–23. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Day B. L., Dressler D., Maertens de Noordhout A., Marsden C. D., Nakashima K., Rothwell J. C., Thompson P. D. Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses. J Physiol. 1989 May;412:449–473. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Day B. L., Rothwell J. C., Thompson P. D., Dick J. P., Cowan J. M., Berardelli A., Marsden C. D. Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. 2. Multiple descending volleys. Brain. 1987 Oct;110(Pt 5):1191–1209. doi: 10.1093/brain/110.5.1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Edgley S. A., Eyre J. A., Lemon R. N., Miller S. Excitation of the corticospinal tract by electromagnetic and electrical stimulation of the scalp in the macaque monkey. J Physiol. 1990 Jun;425:301–320. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fetz E. E., Cheney P. D., Mewes K., Palmer S. Control of forelimb muscle activity by populations of corticomotoneuronal and rubromotoneuronal cells. Prog Brain Res. 1989;80:437–430. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62241-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Flament D., Goldsmith P., Buckley C. J., Lemon R. N. Task dependence of responses in first dorsal interosseous muscle to magnetic brain stimulation in man. J Physiol. 1993 May;464:361–378. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gracies J. M., Meunier S., Pierrot-Deseilligny E. Evidence for corticospinal excitation of presumed propriospinal neurones in man. J Physiol. 1994 Mar 15;475(3):509–518. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hicks R., Burke D., Stephen J., Woodforth I., Crawford M. Corticospinal volleys evoked by electrical stimulation of human motor cortex after withdrawal of volatile anaesthetics. J Physiol. 1992 Oct;456:393–404. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Iles J. F., Pisini J. V. Cortical modulation of transmission in spinal reflex pathways of man. J Physiol. 1992 Sep;455:425–446. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lemon R. N. The G. L. Brown Prize Lecture. Cortical control of the primate hand. Exp Physiol. 1993 May;78(3):263–301. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1993.sp003686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mazzocchio R., Rothwell J. C., Day B. L., Thompson P. D. Effect of tonic voluntary activity on the excitability of human motor cortex. J Physiol. 1994 Jan 15;474(2):261–267. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Muir R. B., Lemon R. N. Corticospinal neurons with a special role in precision grip. Brain Res. 1983 Feb 21;261(2):312–316. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(83)90635-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nielsen J., Petersen N., Deuschl G., Ballegaard M. Task-related changes in the effect of magnetic brain stimulation on spinal neurones in man. J Physiol. 1993 Nov;471:223–243. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ravnborg M., Blinkenberg M., Dahl K. Standardization of facilitation of compound muscle action potentials evoked by magnetic stimulation of the cortex. Results in healthy volunteers and in patients with multiple sclerosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Jun;81(3):195–201. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(91)90072-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rothwell J., Burke D., Hicks R., Stephen J., Woodforth I., Crawford M. Transcranial electrical stimulation of the motor cortex in man: further evidence for the site of activation. J Physiol. 1994 Nov 15;481(Pt 1):243–250. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schieppati M. The Hoffmann reflex: a means of assessing spinal reflex excitability and its descending control in man. Prog Neurobiol. 1987;28(4):345–376. doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(87)90007-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES