Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 25;24:426. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03522-2

Table 4.

Comparison of each marker between the groups of non-PEU, PEU without pseudopolyposis, and PEU with pseudopolyposis

Variable Non-PEU PEU without pseudopolyposis PEU with pseudopolyposis Kruskal–Wallis test Post-hoc test
(n = 34) (n = 16) (n = 11) P-value P1 P2 P3
Alb (g/dL), median [IQR] 4.7 [4.1–5.2] 4.6 [3.8–5.5] 4.5 [3.8–4.9] 0.624 0.998 0.638 0.660
Hb (g/dL), median [IQR] 14.4 [11.2–16.7] 14.8 [12.4–17.9] 14.0 [11.6–18.7] 0.634 0.564 0.962 0.967
CRP (mg/dL), median [IQR] 0.03 [0.02–0.18] 0.06 [0.02–1.46] 0.06 [0.02–0.35] 0.014 0.017 0.159 0.96
FIT (ng/mL), median [IQR] 30 [30–1670] 30 [30–178] 30 [30–1830] 0.712 0.945 0.673 0.916
FC (mg/kg), median [IQR] 54.4 [3.8–721] 122 [8.9–1780] 316 [11.9–2499] 0.014 0.232 0.022 0.255

PEU past extensive ulcer, P1 non-PEU vs. PEU without pseudopolyposis, P2 non-PEU vs. PEU with pseudopolyposis, P3 PEU without pseudopolyposis vs. PEU with pseudopolyposis, Alb albumin, IQR interquartile range, CRP C-reactive protein, Hb hemoglobin, FIT fecal immunochemical occult blood test, FC fecal calprotectin