Skip to main content
Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry logoLink to Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry
. 2024 Nov 19;20:3016–3025. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.20.251

Tunable full-color dual-state (solution and solid) emission of push–pull molecules containing the 1-pyrindane moiety

Anastasia I Ershova 1, Sergey V Fedoseev 1, Konstantin V Lipin 1, Mikhail Yu Ievlev 1, Oleg E Nasakin 1, Oleg V Ershov 1,
Editor: Aurelio Mateo-Alonso
PMCID: PMC11590021  PMID: 39600954

Abstract

A facile method for the synthesis of arylidene derivatives of pyrindane – (E)-7-arylmethylene-2-chloro-6,7-dihydro-5H-cyclopenta[b]pyridine-3,4-dicarbonitriles – was developed. Tunable full-color emission was achieved for the synthesized push–pull molecules, solely by changing donor groups while keeping both the conjugated system and acceptor part of the molecule unchanged. This represents a rare approach for the design of such fluorophores. Arylidene derivatives of pyrindane were found to be efficient fluorescent dyes showing a moderate to high emission quantum yield. The push–pull molecules were also characterized by a dual-state emission (in solution and in the solid state). Emission maxima ranged from 469 to 721 nm in solution depending on the solvent and type of donor substituent, and from 493 to 767 nm in the solid state. For the arylidene derivative of pyrindane with a dimethylamino group, it was shown that fluorescence can be changed by the action of an acid both in solution and in the solid state.

Keywords: dual-state emission, full-color emission, nitriles, push–pull molecules, pyrindane, stilbazole

Introduction

Over the past decades, heteroaromatic push–pull molecules have attracted great attention due to their widespread use in materials chemistry. This type of chromophores is of particular interest in the fields of organic electronics, photonics, and optoelectronics due to their unique optical and electronic properties [113]. Among heteroaromatic push–pull molecules, stilbazole derivatives (pyridostilbenes, azastilbenes, styrylpyridines or azinylarylethenes) are an important class. Uniquely, stilbazole provides a universal framework (exclusive matrix) for the design of donor–π–acceptor (D–π–A) molecules [1415]. It has a branched π-conjugated system, in which the aromatic ring acts as a donor and pyridine as an acceptor. The introduction of additional substituents to stilbazole makes it possible to change the optical properties of this molecular framework within a wide range [1619]. This approach has found many applications in the synthesis of compounds that are used in various optical materials [14,2033]. For example, organic π-systems whose main structural unit is stilbazole are used as active compounds in organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) [20], dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) [21], nonlinear optics (NLO) materials [2223], positron emission tomography (PET) imaging [24], fluorescent probes and labels [2527] detecting H2S in foodstuff, water, and living cells [28], Fe3+ ions [29], Hg2+ ions [30], and cyanide anions [31], for acid–base vapor sensing [32], and as candidate material for photonics devices, optical switches, and optical power limiting applications [33].

Materials with tunable full-color emission based on small organic molecules have attracted attention due to their great potential for applications [3444]. These compounds provide unique benefits due to their flexibility, high efficiency, and versatility, making them essential for modern high-tech applications. Despite the wide variety of known push–pull molecules, the number of fluorescent cores with synthetic potential for tuning the emission wavelength to achieve a full-emission spectrum is limited. Typically, full-color fluorescence of organic molecules is achieved by extending π-conjugated systems or by introducing combinations of donor and acceptor groups, which changes the electronic properties and consequently the emission spectra [3544]. This approach is synthetically challenging since it requires optimization of the reaction conditions for each modification step of the conjugated system. In this work, full-color fluorescence has been achieved solely by changing the donor groups, while the conjugated system and the multiacceptor part of the molecule were left unchanged, which is a rare approach for such fluorophores.

Another rare phenomenon for push–pull molecules is dual-state emission (DSE) [4547]. At the same time, the scope of applications of fluorophores exhibiting DSE is much wider. This is due to the fact that DSE molecules, after absorbing energy, are able to emit in two different states (solution and solid state). This makes them more versatile and allows them to be used for the creation of fluorescent materials with different characteristics. Molecules exhibiting DSE are required to have certain structural features. First, they often contain donor and acceptor groups arranged in a specific sequence, such as in D–π–A chromophores. This creates the conditions for efficient intramolecular charge transfer (ICT), which plays a key role in the DSE phenomenon. Also, additional substituents can affect the geometry and conformation of the molecule, which may be important for the manifestation of the DSE phenomenon [4546].

Previously, we have reported the synthesis of stilbazoles A (Figure 1) [17]. In the present work, we developed a method for the synthesis of a rare class of compounds: arylidene derivatives of pyrindane 1 with conformational rigidity along the C–C bond between the heterocycle and ethene bridge due to the fused cyclic fragment. As a consequence of the additional ring, the fluorescence efficiency increased. At the same time, solid-state emission was observed due to the steric hindrance, which prevented intermolecular interactions in the nonplanar pyrindanes 1. The obtained compounds 1, having a 2-chloropyridine-3,4-dicarbonitrile moiety, contained easily modifiable functional groups [4855]. This qualified compounds 1 as promising building blocks for diversity-oriented synthesis [5657] and for the facile preparation of molecular libraries with an emphasis on skeletal diversity for the development of new push–pull molecules.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structure of previously synthesized stilbazoles А and arylidene derivatives of pyrindane 1 reported herein.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis and structure determination

A two-step procedure was used to obtain the target compounds (Scheme 1). Cyclopenta[b]pyridine derivative 2 [58] was prepared in the first step via three-component reaction between tetracyanoethylene, cyclopentanone, and hydrogen chloride. Then, multiacceptor compound 2 was involved in the condensation with aromatic aldehydes bearing electron-donor groups. As a result, a series of new push–pull molecules containing various numbers of substituents at the donor site, which differed in their electron-donating strength, was obtained.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of donor–acceptor 1-pyrindane derivatives 1.

It was found that the reaction of pyridine 2 with aromatic aldehydes occurred with complete stereoselectivity – only the E-isomer was obtained as the reaction product. The configuration of the double bond was confirmed using 1H,1H-NOESY spectroscopy. As shown in Figure 2, a correlation between protons of the allyl moiety and the aryl substituent evidenced their spatial proximity in molecule 1c. The absence of a correlation between allyl and vinyl protons additionally supported the E-configuration.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

1H,1H-NOESY spectrum of compound 1c in DMSO-d6.

Spectral–luminescence properties

Compounds 1 form colored crystals, from pale-yellow (i.e., 1a) to almost black (i.e., 1h). They are soluble and luminescent in most common organic solvents. Solvatochromism of stilbazole 1c, containing a para-methoxy group, was studied first (see Table S1 and Figure S1, Supporting Information File 1). The electronic absorption spectra were characterized by a pronounced maximum in the visible region centered at 431–448 nm. Emission maxima of compound 1c were more significantly affected by the change of polarity and ranged from 475 nm (blue-green) in tetrachloromethane (CTC) to 588 nm (orange) in formic acid. Therefore, it was found that compound 1c was characterized by a large Stokes shift upon increasing the solvent polarity, which reached 150 nm (5824 cm−1) in formic acid. This was associated with the bathochromic shift of the emission band, indicating that the more polar singlet excited state (S1) was much better stabilized by polar solvents than the ground state (S0). The highest fluorescence quantum yield of about 87% was observed in toluene.

Then, the solvatochromic properties of stilbazole 1i, bearing a stronger electron-donating dimethylamino group, were studied (Table 1 and Figure 3). It was found that in most solvents, compound 1i was characterized by a single pronounced absorption maximum in the range of 503–525 nm that red-shifted upon increasing the solvent polarity. In formic acid, due to the protonation of the dimethylamino group, a strong blue shift occurred down to 394 nm. The only exception was a solution of 1i in acetic acid, where two peaks were observed. Apparently, the weaker acetic acid caused just a partial protonation of the amino group, and the equilibrium shown in Scheme 2 was observed. This was evidenced by two observed absorption maxima: the first almost coincided with the corresponding maximum of the solution in formic acid, and the second one was in the same region as with other aprotic solvents.

Table 1.

Solvatochromic properties of compound 1i.

solvent λabs, nma ε, M−1⋅cm−1 λem, nmb Stokes shift Φem, %c

nm cm−1

CCl4 (CTC) 515 31000 554 39 1367 73.9
PhMe 510 36700 598 88 2885 49.5
1,4-dioxane 503 39400 614 111 3594 27.4
DCM 526 44400 656 130 3768 4.9
AcOEt 505 39900 651 146 4441 3.0
MeCN 510 40200 710 200 5523 0.7
DMSO 525 34900 721 196 5178 0.9
AcOH 389
511
19700
10100
467
662
78
151
4294
4464
24.6d
1.8
HCOOH 394 28200 486 92 4805 30.9d
MeOH 510 e 691 181 5136 0.1

aAbsorption maxima were recorded in solution (c = 10−5 M). bEmission maxima were recorded in solution (c = 10−5 M, absorption maxima were used for excitation. cRelative emission quantum yield was estimated using a solution of rhodamine 6G in ethanol (Φem = 0.95 at 450 nm). dRelative emission quantum yield was estimated using a solution of 7-hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin in phosphate buffer at pH 10 (Φem = 0.7 at 330 nm). ePoorly soluble sample.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Absorption (left) and normalized emission spectra (right) of compound 1i in various solvents (c = 10−5 M).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Plausible equilibrium of compounds 1i and 1iH+ in acidic solution.

The emission maxima of stilbazole 1i were within a very wide range of 264 nm and covered almost the entire visible region of the spectrum (from blue to red, Figure 3B and Figure 4). Acidic solutions were the most blue-shifted due to the formation of the protonated form 1iH+ (Scheme 2). Two emission maxima were observed in acetic acid and associated with the corresponding absorption maxima. The first, located at 467 nm (excitation at 389 nm) was assigned to the formed 1iH+ cation. This band showed a blue shift of 19 nm relative to formic acid due to the lower polarity of acetic acid. At the same time, the second band was assigned to the molecular form 1i (Scheme 2) and observed at 662 nm (excitation at 511 nm), in the region of solvents with medium polarity. Protonation of the dimethylamino group was additionally confirmed by titration of pyrindane 1i in toluene using trifluoroacetic acid (see Figure S2, Supporting Information File 1). According to the data obtained, an increasing amount of acid caused a blue shift of the maximum at 511 nm, and a new maximum in the region of 380–400 nm appeared in the absorption spectra. The intensity of the short-wavelength band also increased upon addition of trifluoroacetic acid. At the same time, a second band centered at 440 nm also appeared in the emission spectra. Additional evidence for protonation of the dimethylamino group in 1iH+ (Scheme 2), rather than the pyridine fragment, was the solvatochromic behavior of compound 1c (see Table S1, Supporting Information File 1). The solutions in AcOH and HCOOH did not show a strong blue shift since protonation did not occur. In these solvents, a classical pattern for the bathochromic emission shift was observed upon increasing the solvent polarity.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Solvatochromic behavior of compounds 1c and 1i: plots of arithmetic mean of emission/absorption wavenumbers vs Kawsk–Chamma–Viallet polarity function (left) and photos of fluorescent solutions in various solvents taken under a 365 nm UV lamp (right).

Generally, both stilbazoles 1c and 1i were characterized by solvatochromic behavior typical for molecules showing an ICT. A significant long-wavelength shift of the emission band was observed upon increasing the solvent polarity from carbon tetrachloride to DMSO, and the strongest fluorescence was registered in nonpolar medium (Φem = 87.5 % for compound 1c in toluene and Φem = 73.9% for compound 1i in CCl4). Slopes of the Lippert–Mataga plots (Figures S3 and S4, Supporting Information File 1) and the Kawski–Chamma–Viallet plots [5960] (Figure 4, see Supporting Information File 1 for details) showed good linearity. This also indicated that the excited-state dipole moment of the molecules was much higher than that in the ground state. This phenomenon was even more pronounced for compound 1i than for 1c due to presence of the stronger electron-donating group.

Then, the substituent effects on the spectral properties of stilbazoles 1ai were studied in two different solvents: nonpolar toluene (Table 2) and highly polar DMSO (Table 3). The absorption maxima of compounds 1ai were in the range of 402–510 nm (Figure 5, left). The most blue-shifted absorbance was observed for stilbazole 1a, bearing no conjugated donor groups. Depending on their number and donor strength, the introduction of electron-donating substituents led to a bathochromic shift. The only exceptions were compounds 1e and 1f, containing three methoxy groups. In these cases, a blue shift of the absorption band in comparison to the disubstituted derivative 1d was observed, which was apparently caused by a partial planarity violation due to steric hindrance. In DMSO, the absorption maxima of compounds 1ai were bathochromically shifted to 409–525 nm (Figure 5, right) and showed similar behavior to that described above.

Table 2.

Photophysical properties of stilbazoles 1 in toluene.

compound λabs, nma ε, M−1⋅cm−1 λem, nmb Stokes shift Φem, %c

nm cm−1

1a 402 13100 459 57 3089 32.9d
1b 411 23500 470 59 3054 12.2d
1c 443 22900 500 57 2573 87.5
1d 454 13600 520 66 2796 35.8
1e 444 26300 511 68 2953 43.2
1f 444 11800 531 87 3690 7.7
1g 485 18300 544 59 2236 53.1
1h 509 29400 582 73 2464 55.2
1i 510 36700 598 88 2885 49.5

aAbsorption maxima were recorded in solution (c = 10−5 M). bEmission maxima were recorded in solution (c = 10−5 M, absorption maxima were used for excitation). cRelative emission quantum yield was estimated using a solution of rhodamine 6G in ethanol (Φem = 0.95 at 450 nm). dRelative emission quantum yield was estimated using a solution of fluorescein in a 0.01 M KOH solution in ethanol (Φem = 0.97 at 425 nm).

Table 3.

Photophysical properties of stilbazoles 1 in DMSO.

compound λabs, nma ε, M−1⋅cm−1 λem, nmb Stokes shift Φem, %c

nm cm−1

1a 409 25600 506 97 4687 12.3d
1b 419 26300 528 109 4927 53.4d
1c 439 26400 578 139 5478 48.4
1d 460 22100 602 142 5128 20.5
1e 442 28800 596 154 5846 2.0
1f 453 17100 609 156 5655 5.1
1g 483 33000 649 166 5296 1.5
1h 505 31000 712 207 5757 0.2
1i 525 34900 721 196 5178 0.6

aAbsorption maxima were recorded in solution (c = 10−5 M). bEmission maxima were recorded in solution (c = 10−5 M, absorption maxima were used for excitation. cRelative emission quantum yield was estimated using a solution of rhodamine 6G in ethanol (Φem = 0.95 at 450 nm). dRelative emission quantum yield was estimated using a solution of fluorescein in a 0.01 M KOH solution in ethanol (Φem = 0.97 at 425 nm).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Absorption spectra of compounds 1ai in toluene (left) and DMSO (right, c = 10−5 M).

The photoluminescence spectra of stilbazoles 1ai in toluene were characterized by a maximum in the range of 459–598 nm (Figure 6, left), associated with an emission color from blue to orange (Figure 7, top). The most blue-shifted emission was observed for stilbazole 1a without additional substituents. The introduction of an electron-donating group led to a red shift of the emission in accordance with increasing donor strength and number of substituents. Stilbazoles 1 in toluene were characterized by a high fluorescence quantum yield, reaching 87.5% for the para-methoxy-substituted derivative 1c. Emission maxima in DMSO were found to be in the range of 506–721 nm (Figure 6, right), associated with a fluorescence color from green to red (Figure 7, bottom). The highest fluorescence efficiency of 53.4% was observed for the para-methyl derivative 1b. Solutions of stilbazoles 1 in DMSO were also characterized by large Stokes shift values, reaching 207 nm (5846 cm−1) and showing nonradiative loss of excitation energy.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Normalized emission spectra of compounds 1ai in toluene (left) and DMSO (right, c = 10−5 M).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Photos of fluorescent solutions of compounds 1ai in toluene (top) and DMSO (bottom) taken under a 365 nm UV lamp.

It should be noted that stilbazoles 1, in contrast to related compounds A (Figure 1), were characterized by solid-state emission (Table 4 and Figure 8). This was apparently caused by the presence of the dimethylene bridge, preventing intermolecular interactions. Emission maxima of compounds 1 ranged from 540–767 nm, namely from the green to the near-infrared region of the spectrum. The highest intensity was observed for stilbazole 1a, bearing no donor groups. The emission intensity decreased upon increasing the donor strength of the substituent. As shown in Scheme 2 and according to the fluorescence spectra recorded in acidic solutions, compound 1i could form the salt 1iH+. Therefore, the effect of acid vapors on the solid-state emission was studied. It was found that pyrindane 1i was sensitive to formic and trifluoroacetic acid vapors. As a result of protonation, a significant blue shift of the emission maximum from 762 nm down to 493 nm was observed.

Table 4.

Solid-state photoluminescence of stilbazoles 1.

compound λem, nm emission intensity, a.u.a

1a 540 798
1b 573 391
1c 641 139
1d 629 127
1e 596 202
1f 596 142
1g 631 77
1h 795 31
1i 762 12
1iH+ 493 322

aEmission intensity is given in arbitrary units (a.u.) of the Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrometer, see Supporting Information File 1 for details.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Normalized solid-state emission spectra of compounds 1ai (bottom) and photos of powders taken under a 365 nm UV lamp (top).

Conclusion

A method for the synthesis of new push–pull stilbazoles of the type D–π–A was developed. The obtained compounds represent a rare class of benzylidene derivatives of 1-pyrindane. They were characterized by an unusual type of photoluminescence in two states (dual-state emission), namely in solution and in the solid state. Emission in solution was in the range of 469–721 nm, depending on the solvent, number, and type of substituent and covered almost the entire visible spectrum. In the solid state, the emission ranged from 493–767 nm. It was found that the presence of a dimethylene bridge in arylidene derivatives of pyrindane 1 led to an increase in the emission quantum yield and caused an appearance of solid-state photoluminescence, in contrast to the previously synthesized analogues (stilbazoles A, Figure 1) without such a bridge (Tables S3 and S4, Supporting Information File 1). Moreover, it was found that the emission band could be adjusted by about 200 nm in solution and by 270 nm in the solid state through directed protonation of the dimethylamino group.

Supporting Information

File 1

Synthetic procedure and compound characterization data, solvatochromic studies for compound , titration data, and 1H and 13C NMR spectra for compounds 1ai.

This article is part of the thematic issue "π-Conjugated molecules and materials".

Funding Statement

This work was performed within the framework of the state task of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (project no. FEGR-2023-0004).

Data Availability

All data that supports the findings of this study is available in the published article and/or the supporting information of this article.

References

  • 1.Bureš F. RSC Adv. 2014;4:58826–58851. doi: 10.1039/c4ra11264d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Klikar M, Solanke P, Tydlitát J, Bureš F. Chem Rec. 2016;16:1886–1905. doi: 10.1002/tcr.201600032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang J, Gadenne V, Patrone L, Raimundo J-M. Molecules. 2024;29(3):559. doi: 10.3390/molecules29030559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.He G S, Tan L-S, Zheng Q, Prasad P N. Chem Rev. 2008;108:1245–1330. doi: 10.1021/cr050054x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Allard S, Forster M, Souharce B, Thiem H, Scherf U. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2008;47:4070–4098. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ohmori Y. Laser Photonics Rev. 2010;4:300–310. doi: 10.1002/lpor.200810059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jaswal S, Kumar J. Mater Today: Proc. 2020;26:566–580. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.161. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang L, Zhu W. Adv Sci. 2024;11:2307227. doi: 10.1002/advs.202307227. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wu Y, Zhu W. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:2039–2058. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35346f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sil A, Ghosh U, Dolai S, Manna S, Maity A, Patra S K. Mater Adv. 2022;3:5497–5509. doi: 10.1039/d1ma01179k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Huang T, Jiang W, Duan L. J Mater Chem C. 2018;6:5577–5596. doi: 10.1039/c8tc01139g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Da Lama A, Sestelo J P, Valencia L, Esteban-Gómez D, Sarandeses L A, Martínez M M. Dyes Pigm. 2022;205:110539. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2022.110539. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stanitska M, Volyniuk D, Minaev B, Agren H, Grazulevicius J V. J Mater Chem C. 2024;12:2662–2698. doi: 10.1039/d3tc04514e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lipunova G N, Nosova E V, Trashakhova T V, Charushin V N. Russ Chem Rev. 2011;80:1115–1133. doi: 10.1070/rc2011v080n11abeh004234. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sorokin S P, Ershov O V. Chem Heterocycl Compd. 2022;58:582–584. doi: 10.1007/s10593-022-03132-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sorokin S P, Ievlev M Y, Ershov O V. Dyes Pigm. 2023;219:111581. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2023.111581. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ershova A I, Fedoseev S V, Blinov S A, Ievlev M Y, Lipin K V, Ershov O V. Org Biomol Chem. 2023;21:7935–7943. doi: 10.1039/d3ob01326j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sorokin S P, Ievlev M Y, Ershov O V. Org Biomol Chem. 2024;22:3468–3476. doi: 10.1039/d4ob00177j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cao C, Zeng Z, Cao C. J Phys Org Chem. 2022;35:e4319. doi: 10.1002/poc.4319. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Choi H-J, Song M-G, Sim Y-H, Bae H-K, Kim J-W, Park L S. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst. 2010;531(1):47/[347]–54/[354]. doi: 10.1080/15421406.2010.499316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Risi G, Devereux M, Prescimone A, Housecroft C E, Constable E C. RSC Adv. 2023;13:4122–4137. doi: 10.1039/d3ra00437f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Poornima L, Babu R S, Kalainathan S. J Mol Struct. 2023;1280:134976. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2023.134976. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang T, Ma J, Xu K, Chen R, Cao L, Teng B. Cryst Growth Des. 2022;22:5895–5903. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.2c00523. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Beuché S, Peyronneau M-A, Jego B, Denis C, Bourbon P, Chauvière C, Santerre C, Truillet C, Kuhnast B, Caillé F. J Med Chem. 2023;66:8030–8042. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c00325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Xiong Q, Zhao K, Cheng Y, He C, Lai Y, Shi M, Ming X, Jin F, Tao D, Liao R, et al. Spectrochim Acta, Part A. 2023;286:122012. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2022.122012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Singh D, Shewale D J, Sengupta A, Soppina V, Kanvah S. Org Biomol Chem. 2022;20:7047–7055. doi: 10.1039/d2ob00995a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Luo Y, Yu Q-Q, Gao J-J, Lang X-X, Li H-Y, Yu X-F, Qi X-Y, Wang M-Q. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2021;53:128438. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2021.128438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xie L, Wang R, Fan C, Tu Y, Liu G, Pu S. Food Chem. 2023;410:135411. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Feng X, Li Y, He X, Liu H, Zhao Z, Kwok R T K, Elsegood M R J, Lam J W Y, Tang B Z. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28:1802833. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201802833. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhou H, Sun L, Chen W, Tian G, Chen Y, Li Y, Su J. Tetrahedron. 2016;72:2300–2305. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2016.03.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liang M, Wang K, Guan R, Liu Z, Cao D, Wu Q, Shan Y, Xu Y. Spectrochim Acta, Part A. 2016;160:34–38. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2016.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ma C, He J, Wu Y, Li J, Chen J, Zhang Y, Mo J, Xie H, Chi Z, Li Y, et al. Luminescence. 2023;38:1720–1728. doi: 10.1002/bio.4558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Senthil K, Kalainathan S, Kumar A R, Aravindan P G. RSC Adv. 2014;4:56112–56127. doi: 10.1039/c4ra09112d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhou C, Wang M, Guo W, Ye G, Wang Y, Yang Y, Xia G, Wang H. Dyes Pigm. 2023;213:111198. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2023.111198. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Xu Z, Liao Q, Shi X, Li H, Zhang H, Fu H. J Mater Chem B. 2013;1:6035–6041. doi: 10.1039/c3tb20841a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kim E, Koh M, Ryu J, Park S B. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:12206–12207. doi: 10.1021/ja8020268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Radhakrishnan R, Sinu B B, Anilkumar V, Sreejalekshmi K G. Dyes Pigm. 2020;181:108560. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.108560. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhu P, Yang Y, Li H, Wang J, Li S. Chin Chem Lett. 2024;35(10):109533. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109533. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhu Y, Liao K, Li Y, Zhang W, Song B, Hao X-Q, Zhu X. Dyes Pigm. 2024;224:112004. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2024.112004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang X, Wang D, Shen H, Wang S, Zhou Y, Lei Y, Gao W, Liu M, Huang X, Wu H. Org Chem Front. 2021;8:856–867. doi: 10.1039/d0qo01527j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chen S-H, Cao X-Y, Hu P-T, Jiang K, Liang Y-T, Xu B-J, Li Z-H, Wang Z-Y. Mater Adv. 2023;4(24):6612–6620. doi: 10.1039/d3ma00876b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chen Z, Qin H, Yin Y, Deng D-d, Qin S-Y, Li N, Wang K, Sun Y. Chem – Eur J. 2023;29:e202203797. doi: 10.1002/chem.202203797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wen W, Shi Z-F, Cao X-P, Xu N-S. Dyes Pigm. 2016;132:282–290. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2016.04.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ruan B, Kang X, Guo B, Deng D-d, Tian J-j, He K, Wang X-Y, Pu S, Chen Z. J Mol Struct. 2024;1309:138171. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.138171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Belmonte-Vázquez J L, Amador-Sánchez Y A, Rodríguez-Cortés L A, Rodríguez-Molina B. Chem Mater. 2021;33:7160–7184. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c02460. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Xia G, Si L, Wang H. Mater Today Chem. 2023;30:101596. doi: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2023.101596. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Stoerkler T, Pariat T, Laurent A D, Jacquemin D, Ulrich G, Massue J. Molecules. 2022;27:2443. doi: 10.3390/molecules27082443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Vachova L, Machacek M, Kučera R, Demuth J, Cermak P, Kopecky K, Miletin M, Jedlickova A, Simunek T, Novakova V, et al. Org Biomol Chem. 2015;13:5608–5612. doi: 10.1039/c5ob00651a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ershova A I, Ievlev M Y, Maksimova V N, Ershov O V. Russ J Gen Chem. 2022;92:2690–2697. doi: 10.1134/s1070363222120192. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Fedoseev S V, Belikov M Y, Lipin K V, Ershov O V, Tafeenko V A. Synth Commun. 2022;52:145–156. doi: 10.1080/00397911.2021.2007403. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chunikhin S S, Ershov O V, Ievlev M Y, Belikov M Y, Tafeenko V A. Dyes Pigm. 2018;156:357–368. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.04.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Arafa W A A, Hussein M F. Chin J Chem. 2020;38:501–508. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.201900494. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ershov O V, Shishlikova M A, Ievlev M Y, Belikov M Y, Maksimova V N. Tetrahedron. 2019;75:130465. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2019.130465. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Maximova V N, Naidenova A I, Ershov O V, Nasakin O E, Tafeenko V A. Russ J Org Chem. 2017;53:691–696. doi: 10.1134/s1070428017050086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chunikhin S S, Ershov O V. Russ J Org Chem. 2021;57:1103–1108. doi: 10.1134/s1070428021070113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lenci E, Trabocchi A. Eur J Org Chem. 2022:e202200575. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.202200575. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Spring D R. Org Biomol Chem. 2003;1:3867–3870. doi: 10.1039/b310752n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ershov O V, Maksimova V N, Lipin K V, Belikov M Y, Ievlev M Y, Tafeenko V A, Nasakin O E. Tetrahedron. 2015;71:7445–7450. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2015.06.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kawski A. Z Naturforsch, A: Phys Sci. 2002;57:255–262. doi: 10.1515/zna-2002-0509. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Chamma A, Viallet P. C R Seances Acad Sci, Ser C. 1970;270:1901–1904. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

File 1

Synthetic procedure and compound characterization data, solvatochromic studies for compound , titration data, and 1H and 13C NMR spectra for compounds 1ai.

Data Availability Statement

All data that supports the findings of this study is available in the published article and/or the supporting information of this article.


Articles from Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Beilstein-Institut

RESOURCES