Skip to main content
Journal of Fungi logoLink to Journal of Fungi
. 2024 Oct 30;10(11):749. doi: 10.3390/jof10110749

The Influence of Aspergillus fumigatus Fatty Acid Oxygenases PpoA and PpoC on Caspofungin Susceptibility

Endrews Delbaje 1,, Patrícia Alves de Castro 1,, Dante G Calise 2, Niu Mengyao 2, Maria Augusta Crivelente Horta 1, Daniel Yuri Akiyama 3, João Guilherme Pontes 3, Taícia Fill 3,4, Olaf Kniemeyer 5, Thomas Krüger 5, Axel A Brakhage 5,6, Koon Ho Wong 7,8,9, Nancy P Keller 2,10, Gustavo H Goldman 1,4,*
Editor: David S Perlin
PMCID: PMC11595811  PMID: 39590668

Abstract

Aspergillus fumigatus can cause invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). Fungicidal azoles and fungistatic caspofungin (CAS) are the first- and second-line therapies, respectively, used to treat IPA. Treatment of A. fumigatus with CAS or micafungin induces the production of the oxylipin 5,8-diHODE by the fungal oxygenase PpoA. For this article, we investigated the influence of ppo genes, which encode the fatty acid oxygenases responsible for oxylipin biosynthesis, on CAS tolerance. The influence of PpoA and PpoC on CAS tolerance is mediated by MpkA phosphorylation and protein kinase A (PKA) activity. RNAseq transcriptional profiling and the label-free quantitative proteomics of the ppoA and ppoC mutants showed that differentially expressed genes and proteins are related to secondary metabolites and carbohydrate metabolism. We also characterized two clinical isolates, CM7555 and IFM61407, which decrease and increase susceptibility to CAS, respectively. CM7555 does not exhibit increased oxylipin production in the presence of CAS but oxylipin induction upon CAS exposure is increased in IFM61407, suggesting that oxylipins are not the only mechanism involved in CAS tolerance in these isolates. Upon CAS exposure, CM7555 has higher MpkA phosphorylation and PKA activity than IFM61407. Our results reveal the different aspects and genetic determinants involved in A. fumigatus CAS tolerance.

Keywords: Aspergillus fumigatus, fatty acid oxygenases, oxylipin, caspofungin

1. Introduction

Aspergillus species are saprophytic fungi that can be found ubiquitously in the environment. Within the large and diverse genus Aspergillus, a small number of species are known to cause infection in humans, with A. fumigatus being the most dangerous species that is responsible for more than 90% of Aspergillus infections. Like many other fungi, A. fumigatus can asexually produce great numbers of clonal spores (e.g., millions from a single colony) that are readily dispersed in the environment. It is estimated that we breathe in hundreds of spores from the environment each day. When inhaled, the spores of A. fumigatus can germinate and grow in the respiratory mucosa, leading to the development of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). Aspergillosis can affect various organs by dissemination and disease can occur. IPA is the most severe form of Aspergillus-related infections, predominantly affecting individuals with hematological malignancies, genetic or acquired immunodeficiency, and patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy.

IPA incidence has risen substantially in the last few decades, due to a continuous increase in the number of high-risk populations, such as patients with malignant neoplasms, those undergoing organ transplantation, and patients receiving immunosuppressive treatments for various underlying conditions. The morbidity and mortality rates of IPA among these patients are extremely high, reaching over 90% [1]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many COVID-19 patients were infected by A. fumigatus worldwide, with a mortality rate as high as 50% [2,3]. Therefore, individuals are becoming susceptible to this deadly Aspergillus infection after contracting COVID-19, which is now widely prevalent.

What makes the threatening situation worse is the fact that the treatment of Aspergillus infection (and fungal infection in general) is notoriously difficult. Currently, only three classes of drugs are available in the clinics to treat IPA (and fungal pathogens in general) without adverse side effects for the patients, contrasting with the two dozen antibacterial drugs available [4]. The main classes of antifungal drugs against IPA are azoles, polyenes, and echinocandins. Azoles such as fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole are the first standard treatment against systemic fungal infections and are also the major drugs for IPA treatment, due to their broad spectrum of antifungal activity and good tolerance by humans [5]. Azole drugs act by inhibiting a key enzyme in the ergosterol biosynthetic pathway, Cyp51/Erg11, decreasing its content in the fungal cytoplasmic membrane and, thus, impairing fungal growth [6]. Polyene amphotericin B binds to different kinds of sterols, with higher affinity to ergosterol in the fungal cell membrane where it leads to pore formation, resulting in increased cell permeability and the leakage of small intracellular molecules [7,8]. In contrast, the echinocandin caspofungin (CAS), which is the second-line therapy against IPA when azole treatment is not effective, inhibits β-1,3-glucan synthase, thereby affecting β-1,3-glucan biosynthesis. Consequently, the composition and organization of the A. fumigatus cell wall is altered [9], thereby increasing osmotic sensitivity and causing growth inhibition (i.e., fungistatic effects). It is noteworthy that the clinical application of CAS has gained significant attention recently as a result of the rise of azole-resistant A. fumigatus isolates in clinics [10]. Paradoxically and interestingly, A. fumigatus can somehow survive and grow better at high CAS concentrations with normal morphology. This tolerance phenomenon, named the caspofungin paradoxical effect (CPE), also happens in vivo [11] and could greatly impair the effectiveness of CAS for patient treatment, rendering this second-line therapy (which is often the final resort for critical patients) ineffective. Moreover, similar paradoxical growth phenomena, albeit to a lesser extent, have also been observed with other echinocandins such as micafungin and anidulafungin [12,13].

The mechanism underlying CPE is not well understood. CPE is thought to be mediated by re-localized β-(1,3)-glucan synthase, reconstituted β-(1,3)-glucan synthesis, and normalized levels of cell wall chitin emerging from slow-growing microcolonies [14], although the precise mechanism behind CPE remains speculative. It is proposed that CPE depends on a complex network of interactions between the different pathways, which work together to allow A. fumigatus to resist and grow in the presence of high levels of CAS [15]. CPE can be triggered by an increase in intracellular Ca2+, which binds to calmodulin and activates the phosphatase calcineurin [16] to dephosphorylate the transcription factor CrzA. Dephosphorylated CrzA translocates to the nucleus and activates the genes for stress responses and cell wall modifications [17]. Ca2+ deprivation [18] and/or the absence of different components of the calcineurin pathway [19] result in the abolition of CPE in A. fumigatus. The mitochondrial respiratory chain also affects CPE, as ATP is required for the uptake of extracellular Ca2+ and activation of the Ca2+/calcineurin pathway [20]. In addition, the increased ATP production and oxygen consumption generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the mitochondria [21]. Mitochondrial ROS accumulation alters the plasma membrane lipid composition, causing a conformational change in the Fks1 enzyme that probably affects CAS binding, thereby restoring β-1,3-glucan synthase activity [22].

The cell wall integrity (CWI) pathway has also been implicated in controlling CAS tolerance and CPE. The CWI mitogen-activated protein kinase MpkA and its associated transcription factor RlmA regulate the expression of genes involved in chitin, β-1,3-glucan, and α-1,3-glucan biosynthesis in response to different concentrations of CAS [23]. Moreover, the SakA mitogen-activated protein kinase of the high-osmolarity glycerol (HOG) pathway is required for adaptation to CAS by activating cell-wall stress and via MpkA cross-talk [15]. Although these signaling pathways have been shown to affect CPE in A. fumigatus, their downstream targets, regulatory mechanisms, and the interactions between the pathways have not yet been fully elucidated. Recently, we showed that treatment of A. fumigatus with CAS or micafungin, but not with voriconazole, induces the production of the oxylipin 5,8-diHODE by the fungal oxygenase PpoA [24]; 5,8-diHODE is produced by the dihydroxylation of linoleic acid, first to 8(R)-hydroxy-9Z,12Z70 octadecadienoic acid (8-HODE) and, subsequently, to 5,8-diHODE by the linoleate diol synthase PpoA [25]. Another fatty acid oxygenase, PpoC, produces another linoleic acid-derived oxylipin, 10-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid (10-HODE). Besides ppoA and ppoC, ppoB encodes another uncharacterized fatty acid oxygenase. For this study, we analyzed the involvement of ppo genes in CAS tolerance. We demonstrated that although oxylipins are important for CAS tolerance, other genetic determinants are also involved in this phenomenon. Our findings on CAS tolerance and CPE may shed light on how fungi cope with different kinds of stress and may have implications for combating A. fumigatus and other human fungal pathogens.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains and Media

The A. fumigatus strains were grown at 37 °C in minimal medium (MM: 1% (w/v) glucose, original high nitrate salts, trace elements, pH 6.5). Solid MM was the same as described above, except that 2% (w/v) agar was added. Trace elements and nitrate salt compositions were as described previously [26]. For phenotype characterization, plates were inoculated with 104 spores per strain and left to grow for 120 h at 37 °C. All radial growths were expressed as ratios, dividing the colony radial diameter of growth in the stress condition by the colony radial diameter in control (no stress) conditions.

2.2. Mutant Construction

Three fungal mutants were newly constructed in this study, including the double deletion mutant ΔppoA ΔppoB (TMN30), and overexpression mutants OE::ppoB (TMN33) and OE::ppoC (TMN34). ΔppoA ΔppoB (TMN30) was created by deleting ppoA and ppoB sequentially on Af293.6 (pyrG1, argB1) [27]. The ppoA (Afu4g10770) deletion construct was amplified from pDWC4.2 [28] and then transformed into Af293.6 (argB1, pyrG1) to create the ∆ppoA argB auxotroph. This strain was subsequently used to delete the ppoB gene (Afu4g00180) with the A. fumigatus argB marker amplified from pJMP4 [29], leading to TMN30. A deletion cassette for ppoB was constructed by fusing the ~1 kb 5′ and 3′ flanking regions of the gene with A. parasiticus pyrG. Overexpression strains of ppoB (TMN33) and ppoC (TMN34) were achieved by inserting the selectable marker A. parasiticus pyrG and A. nidulans gpdA promoter upstream of the ppoB or ppoC (Afu3g12120) gene through homologous recombination in the parental strain Af293.1(pyrG1) [30]. The ~1 kb sequence upstream and downstream of the translation start site was amplified as the 5′ and 3′ flanking regions, respectively. The pyrG::gpdA(p) sequence was amplified from pJMP9.1 [31]. All the overexpression fusions happened at the translational start site.

DNA transformation constructs were created through double-joint PCR using the previously published protocol [32]. Protoplast generation and transformation were performed according to the previously published protocol [33]. All transformants were first screened through PCR for incorporation of the construct and the absence of the ppo gene (deletion strain only). Southern blotting, followed by the hybridization of αP32-dCTP-labeled 5′ and 3′ flank regions, were used to confirm those transformants with single integration (Figure S1a–d; https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27134901).

The overexpression of ppoB and ppoC genes was confirmed through semi-quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (semi-q RT-PCR). WT, OE::ppoB, and OE::ppoC spores were grown in liquid GMM at 37 °C and 250 rpm for 24 hr. Fungal biomass was collected, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, lyophilized, and extracted for total RNA using QIAzol lysis reagent (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was assessed while in polyacrylamide gel for quality confirmation. Total RNA was treated with DNaseI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) before cDNA synthesis, using an iScript kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). For this study, 50 ng of cDNA was used for all PCR reactions, using in-house Taq polymerase extract and the Green GoTaq® Reaction Buffer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The Af293 WT genomic DNA and ddH2O were used as the positive and negative controls, and actin gene expression was used as the reference control. PCR products were loaded in a 2% agarose gel, separated through gel electrophoresis, and imaged under UV light. Primer pairs are listed in Table S4 (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27134901) and the Semi-q RT-PCR results are also illustrated in the Supplementary Materials (Figure S1e, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27134901).

2.3. Western Blot Analysis

Wild-type A. fumigatus, ΔppoA, and ΔppoC were grown in liquid MM for 16 h at 37 °C, and were transferred or not to 2 µg/mL of CAS for 0, 10, 30, and 60 min. The OEppoA and OEppoC were grown in liquid MM for 16 h at 37 °C. Total cellular protein extractions were carried out as described previously [34], then quantified using Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Fifty µg of protein from each sample was resolved in a 12% (w/v) SDS–PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The phosphorylated fractions of the MAP kinase, MpkA, and total MpkA were identified using P-p44/42 and p44/42 antibodies (Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA, USA), respectively, following the manufacturer’s instructions and using a 1:2000 dilution). The primary antibody was detected using an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody, raised in rabbit (Sigma, St. Louis, MA, USA). Chemoluminescent detection was achieved using an ECL Prime Western blot detection kit (GE HealthCare, Little Chalfont, UK). To detect these signals on blotted membranes, the ECL Prime Western blotting detection system (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) and LAS1000 (FUJIFILM, Tokyo, Japan) were used.

2.4. PKA Activity Assay

The A. fumigatus strains were grown in liquid MM for 16 h at 37 °C and then transferred or not to 2 µg/mL of CAS for 0, 10, 30, and 60 min. The total protein content was extracted by grinding the pellets using a mortar and pestle in liquid nitrogen and resuspending the results in the lysis buffer present in the kit, supplemented with an EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail tablet (Roche), phenyl methane sulfonyl fluoride (PMSF, 1 mM final concentration) and 50 μL of activated sodium orthovanadate (10 mM final concentration). The extracts were centrifuged at 13,000× g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were collected and the total protein was quantified using Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad). The PKA (Protein Kinase A) Colorimetric Activity Kit (EIAPKA, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was utilized according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The endpoint reaction was detected using a Synergy-HT microplate reader (Bio-Tek) at 450 nm. PKA activity was determined relative to the total protein content of the samples.

2.5. Genome Assembly of CM7555 and IFM61407

The public genome data were obtained from the NCBI SRA database (strain CM7555 with accession DRX013578; strain IFM61407, with accession SRR7418938). The raw data quality and the presence of adapters were visualized with FastQC v0.11.8 [35]. The adapter sequences were trimmed, and reads were quality-filtered using Trimmomatic v0.39 [36] with the parameters ‘LEADING:20 TRAILING:20 MINLEN:60′. For the de novo genome assembly, the program SPAdes v.3.14.0 [37] was used. The assembly statistics (genome length, contigs, GC(%), and N50) were evaluated with QUAST v5.2.0 [38].

2.6. RNA Extraction, RNA-Sequencing and RTqPCR

Strains were grown for 16 h in liquid MM at 37 °C and then exposed or not to CAS 2 µg/mL for 1 h. OEppoA, and OEppoC were grown for 16 h in liquid minimal medium without any further exposure to CAS. The mycelia were harvested and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted using the Trizol method (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), treated with RNase-free DNase I (Fermentas, Waltham, MA, USA), and purified using an RNAeasy Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA from each exposure was quantified using a NanoDrop and Qubit fluorometer and analyzed using an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer system to assess the integrity of the RNA. The RNA integrity number (RIN) was also calculated; the RNA sample had an RIN of  9.0–9.5. For library preparation, the Illumina TruSeq Stranded mRNA Sample Preparation kit was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For RTqPCR, the RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using the ImProm-II reverse transcription system (Promega), and the synthesized cDNA was used for real-time analysis using the SYBR green PCR master mix kit (Applied Biosystems) in the ABI 7500 fast real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The primer sequences used for the ppoA and ppoC genes are described in Table S4 (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27134901).

2.7. Differential Expression Analysis

The quality of sequences was assessed using FastQC v0.11.8 [35]. The adapter sequences were trimmed, then reads were quality-filtered using Trimmomatic v0.39 [36], with the parameters ‘ILLUMINACLIP:NexteraPE-PE.fa:2:30:10 LEADING:20 TRAILING:20 MINLEN:60′. rRNA reads were removed using SortMeRNA v4.3.6 [39]. The filtered reads were then aligned to the A. fumigatus reference sequence Af293 (NCBI assembly code GCA_000002655.1) using Hisat v2.2.1 [40], with splice site positions and a maximum intron length of 3093, both of which were obtained from the reference Af293. Subsequently, the SAM files were converted to BAM format and sorted using SAMtools v1.15.1 [41]. FeatureCounts v1.5.3 [42] was used to quantify the non-ambiguous aligned fragments and to produce the tables for RNAseq analysis. For the differential expression analysis, the counts were converted to counts per million (CPM). The features were filtered, ensuring that the sum of all samples had a CPM of at least 3, considering those samples with a CPM above 1 for the sum. Differential expression analysis of the filtered genes was performed using edgeR v3.14.0 [43] with the simple design protocol [44].

2.8. Proteome Analysis

Aspergillus fumigatus Af293 and the ppoA and ppoC mutants were analyzed in triplicate, each without treatment (DMSO control) and with caspofungin treatment. The harvested cells were ground with a mortar and pestle in liquid nitrogen and lysed in 1% SDS, 150 mM NaCl, and 100 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB), with the addition of 1 tablet of complete ultra protease inhibitor cocktail and PhosStop (both Roche) per 10 mL of lysis buffer. Subsequently, the cysteine thiols were reduced and carbamidomethylated in one step for 30 min at 70 °C by the addition of 2 µL of 500 mM TCEP (tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine) and 2 µL of 625 mM 2-chloroacetamide (CAA) per 100 µg of total protein in each 100 µL. The proteins were precipitated by MeOH/chloroform/H2O [45] and resolubilized in 100 mM TEAB in 5:95 trifluoroethanol/H2O (v/v). The proteins were digested for 18 h at 37 °C after the addition of Trypsin/Lys-C mix at a protease-to-protein ratio of 1:25. Tryptic peptides were dried in a vacuum concentrator (Eppendorf) and resolubilized in 30 µL of 0.05% TFA in H2O/ACN 98/2 (v/v), filtered through 10 kDa MWCO PES membrane spin filters (VWR). The filtrate was transferred to HPLC vials and injected into the LC-MS/MS instrument.

Each sample was measured in triplicate (3 analytical replicates of 3 biological replicates). LC-MS/MS analysis was performed on an Ultimate 3000 nano RSLC system connected to an Orbitrap Exploris 480 mass spectrometer (both Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with FAIMS. Peptide trapping was conducted for 5 min on an Acclaim Pep Map 100 column (2 cm × 75 µm, 3 µm) at 5 µL/min, followed by separation on an analytical Acclaim Pep Map RSLC nano column (50 cm × 75 µm, 2 µm). The mobile phase gradient elution of eluent A (0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water), mixed with eluent B (0.1% (v/v) formic acid in 90/10 acetonitrile/water), was performed using the following gradients: 0 min at 4% B, 20 min at 6% B, 45 min at 10% B, 75 min at 16% B, 105 min at 25% B, 135 min at 45% B, 150 min at 65% B, 160–165 min at 96% B, 165.1–180 min at 4% B. Positively charged ions were generated at a spray voltage of 2.2 kV using a stainless steel emitter attached to the Nanospray Flex ion source (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The quadrupole/orbitrap instrument was operated in Full MS/data-dependent MS2 mode. Precursor ions were monitored at m/z 300–1200 at a resolution of 120,000 FWHM (full width at half maximum), using a maximum injection time (ITmax) of 50 ms and a 300% normalized AGC (automatic gain control) target. Precursor ions with a charge state of z = 2–5 were filtered at an isolation width of m/z 4.0 amu for further fragmentation at 28% HCD collision energy. MS2 ions were scanned at 15,000 FWHM (ITmax = 40 ms, AGC= 200%). Three different compensation voltages were applied (−48 V, −63 V, and −78 V).

2.9. Protein Database Search

Tandem mass spectra were searched against the UniProt pan proteome databases (2023/01/16) of Aspergillus fumigatus (https://ftp.uniprot.org/pub/databases/uniprot/current_release/knowledgebase/pan_proteomes/UP000002530.fasta.gz; accessed on 21 December 2022) using Proteome Discoverer (PD) 3.0 (Thermo) and the database search algorithms Mascot 2.8, Comet, MS Amanda 2.0, Sequest HT, with and without INFERYS rescoring, and CHIMERYS. Two missed cleavages were allowed for the tryptic digestion results. The precursor mass tolerance was set to 10 ppm and the fragment mass tolerance was set to 0.02 Da. Modifications were defined as dynamic Met oxidation, the phosphorylation of Ser, Thr, and Tyr, and protein N-term acetylation with and without Met-loss, as well as static Cys carbamidomethylation. A strict false discovery rate (FDR) of <1% (peptide and protein levels) was required for positive protein hits. Furthermore, search engine scores were filtered for either Mascot (>30), Comet (>3), MS Amanda 2.0 (>300), Sequest HT (>3), or CHIMERYS (>2). The Percolator node of PD3.0 and a reverse decoy database were used for the q-value validation of spectral matches. Only rank-1 proteins and the peptides of the top-scoring proteins were counted. Label-free protein quantification was based on the Minora algorithm of PD3.0, using precursor abundance based on intensity and a signal-to-noise ratio of >5. Normalization was performed using the total peptide amount method. The imputation of missing quantification values was applied, using abundance values of 75% of the lowest abundance identified. Differential protein abundance was defined as a fold change of >2, a p-value/ABS (log4ratio) of <0.05, and at least being identified in 2 of the 3 replicates of the sample group with the highest abundance.

2.10. HPLC-HRMS2 Analysis

HPLC-HRMS2 positive-mode analysis was performed in a Thermo Scientific QExactive Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer, coupled to a Dionex UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano system. As the stationary phase, a Thermo Scientific column Accucore C18 2.6 µm (2.1 mm × 100 mm × 1.7 µm) was used. The mobile phase was 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B). Eluent profile (A/B %): 95/5 for 5 min, reaching 60/40 at 10 min, up to 55/45 within 2 min and reaching 2/98 at 18 min, maintained for 2 min, down to 95/5 within 2 min, and maintained for 2 min. Total run time was 24 min for each run at a flow rate of 0.3 mL.min−1. The injection volume was 5 µL. MS spectra were acquired, with m/z ranges from 100 to 1500, and 70,000 mass resolution at 200 Da. Ionization parameters: sheath gas flow rate (45), aux gas flow rate (10), sweep gas flow rate (2), spray voltage (3.5 kV), capillary temperature (250 °C), S-lens RF level (50), and auxiliary gas heater temperature (400 °C). MS2 spectra were acquired using the data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode. The normalized collision energy was applied stepwise (20, 30, and 40 eV), and the 5 most intense precursors per cycle were measured with 17,500 mass resolution at 200 Da.

2.11. Secondary Metabolite Annotation

Raw HPLC-HRMS2 data were converted into mzML format files in MSConvert, with 32-bit binary encoding precision, zlib compression, and peak peaking. Secondary metabolites were annotated in the online workflow (https://ccms-ucsd.github.io/GNPSDocumentation/, accessed on 15 March 2023) on the GNPS website (http://gnps.ucsd.edu, accessed on 15 March 2023). The data were filtered by removing all MS/MS fragment ions within +/- 17 Da of the precursor m/z. MS/MS spectra were window-filtered by choosing only the top 6 fragment ions in the +/- 50 Da window throughout the spectrum. The precursor ion mass tolerance was set to 0.02 Da at an MS/MS fragment ion tolerance of 0.02 Da. The spectra were then searched against the GNPS spectral libraries. The library spectra were filtered in the same manner as the input data. All matches that were kept between the network spectra and library spectra were required to have a score above 0.7 and at least 5 matched peaks.

2.12. Fungal Oxylipin Extraction

The A. fumigatus conidia were inoculated at 5 × 106 spores per mL into 50 mL GMM and incubated at 37 °C and 250 RPM for 48 h before the addition of caspofungin (2 µg/mL) or DMSO (0.0002%, v/v) and an additional 48-hour incubation. The supernatants were filtered into 250 mL glass bottles by collecting mycelial tissue in sterile miracloth. The collected tissue was press-dried, flash-frozen, and lyophilized. Supernatants were extracted overnight for oxylipins, as previously described, with 100 mL ethyl acetate (EA):methanol (MeOH):dichloromethane (DCM) (8:1:1) mixed organic solvent. The organic phase was collected using a separatory funnel and evaporated to dryness using a Buchi Rotovap R-210. The lyophilized tissue was weighed to determine the dry biomass before being homogenized in 10 mL sterile water with 0.01% formic acid. Homogenized tissue was extracted overnight in 120 mL mixed organic solvent at EA:MeOH:DCM. The tissue and debris were filtered out using Whatman paper filters, and an equal volume of Milli-Q water was added to the mixed organic solvent in a separatory funnel. The organic layer was collected after shaking and venting twice and evaporated to dryness. The total extracts were dissolved in 4 mL MeOH and transferred to pre-weighed 20 mL glass scintillation vials, then evaporated to dryness again. The dried extracts were weighed and stored at −80 °C. Extracts were dissolved at 1 mg/mL in MeOH for analysis by UHPLC–HRMS/MS.

2.13. UHPLC–HRMS/MS Analysis

The ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC–HRMS) data were acquired using a Thermo Scientific Q Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer coupled to a Vanquish UHPLC and operated in both positive and negative ionization modes. All the solvents used were of spectroscopic grade. Each sample was filtered with a 0.2 µm syringe filter. A Waters XBridge BEH-C18 column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.7 μm) was used with acetonitrile (0.1% formic acid) and water (0.1% formic acid) as solvents, at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. The screening gradient method for the samples was as follows: starting at a 55% organic hold for 1 min, followed by a linear increase to a 98% organic hold for 18 min, then holding at a 98% organic hold for 2 min, comprising a total of 21 min. A quantity of 10 μL of each sample was injected into the experimental system for the analysis. Purified 5,8-diHODE, 8-HODE, and 10-HODE were used as standards. For the quantification, standard curves for 5,8-diHODE, 8-HODE, and 10-HODE were calculated based on the intensities from 6 different concentrations of each purified oxylipin (5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.625, 0.3125, and 0.15625 ppm).

3. Results

3.1. A. fumigatus ppo Mutants Have Altered Caspofungin Susceptibility

There are three ppo genes that encode fatty acid oxygenases in A. fumigatus [46]. We characterized the CAS susceptibility of ΔppoA, ΔppoB, ΔppoC, the double mutants ΔppoA ΔppoB, ΔppoA ΔppoC, and ΔppoB ΔppoC, and the constitutively overexpressed gpdA::ppoA (OEppoA), gpdA::ppoB (OEppoB), and gpdA::ppoC (OEppoC) strains (Figure 1a,b). At low CAS concentrations (0.250 µg/mL), ΔppoA, ΔppoB, ΔppoC, the double mutants ΔppoA ΔppoB, ΔppoA ΔppoC, and OEppoB showed higher CAS sensitivity than the wild-type strain (Figure 1a). In contrast, OEppoA and OEppoC were more resistant to CAS 0.250 µg/mL than the wild-type strain (Figure 1a). At high concentrations, CSP induced a tolerance phenotype with the partial reestablishment of fungal growth, called the CAS paradoxical effect (CPE), resulting from a change in the composition of the cell wall (for a review, see Ref. [20]). Surprisingly, the double mutant ΔppoB ΔppoC is as sensitive to CAS as the wild type, while ΔppoB and ΔppoC are more sensitive than the double mutant (Figure 1a). It is possible that there are additional mechanisms for coping with CAS stress that are activated when both genes are deleted; this remains to be determined.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A. fumigatus ppo mutants exhibit altered susceptibility to CAS, cell-wall-damaging agents, and osmotic stress. The A. fumigatus wild-type and ppo mutants were grown for 5 days at 37 °C in MM that was supplemented or not with CAS 0.25 µg/mL (a), CAS 8 µg/mL (b), CFW 20 µg/mL (c), CR 10 µg/mL (d), and sorbitol 1.2 M (e). The results are expressed as the radial growth of the treatment, divided by the radial growth of the control, and are the average of three biological repetitions ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. ** p-value < 0.01, *** p-value < 0.001, **** p-value < 0.0001.

Surprisingly, all the mutants had reduced CPE (Figure 1b). We also assessed the susceptibility of these mutants to cell wall damaging agents, such as Congo Red (CR) and Calcofluor White (CFW), and the highly osmotic conditions provided by 1.2 M sorbitol (Figure 1c,d). The ΔppoB, all the double mutants, and OEppoB were more resistant to cell wall damaging agents and osmotic stress conditions (Figure 1c,d).

As an initial step to understand the mechanisms of altered caspofungin susceptibilities that are dependent on ppo mutants, we decided to concentrate our attention on the four mutants of ΔppoA, ΔppoC, OEppoA, and OEppoC in subsequent experiments. It has previously been shown that CAS induces A. fumigatus MAP kinase MpkA from the cell wall integrity pathway and protein kinase A activity (PKA) [47,48,49]. Exposure of wild-type A. fumigatus to 2 µg/mL CAS for different periods of time showed a peak of MpkA phosphorylation at 10 min, while the overexpression of PpoA and PpoC for 16 h showed two-fold higher MpkA phosphorylation than the wild type (Figure 2a).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cell wall integrity pathway and protein kinase A activity are important for ppo-altered susceptibility to CAS. (a) Western blot analysis for wild-type A. fumigatus, ΔppoA, and ΔppoC, grown in liquid MM for 16 h at 37 °C and transferred, or not, to 2 µg/mL of CAS for 0, 10, 30, and 60 min. OEppoA and OEppoC were grown in liquid MM for 16 h at 37 °C. MpkA-P was identified using P-p44/42 antibody, while histone H3 was identified by the anti-histone H3 antibody. (b) PKA activity of the wild-type and ppo mutants. The strains were grown as described in (a) and the samples were processed according to the PKA colorimetric activity kit (https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/br/pt/EIAPKA, accessed on 29 September 2024) and normalized using the total protein. The results are the average of three repetitions ± standard deviation. *** p-value < 0.001 (c,d) FunCat analysis of the DEGs that were up- and downregulated in the ΔppoC and OEppoC mutants. (e) LC-HRMS analysis of the supernatant of the wild-type and OEppoC strains grown in liquid MM for 5 days at 37 °C. The results are the average of three repetitions ± standard deviation.

In contrast, the exposure of ΔppoA and ΔppoC to CAS showed the delayed induction of and no MpkA phosphorylation, respectively (Figure 2a). Upon exposure to CAS (2 µg/mL) for different periods of time, increased activity from PKA (up to 3-fold) was seen in the wild-type strain (Figure 2b). Increased PKA activity was also observed when PpoA and PpoC were overexpressed for 16 h (Figure 2b). However, there was a significant decrease in PKA activity in the ΔppoA and ΔppoC mutants when compared to the wild type (Figure 2b).

These results suggest that the ppo mutants are important for the response to CAS. Moreover, PpoA and PpoC influence CAS susceptibility, which is probably mediated by MpkA phosphorylation and PKA activity.

3.2. Transcriptional Profiling of PpoA and PpoC Null and Overexpression Mutants

To identify possible gene targets that are affected by ppoA/ppoC deletion and/or overexpression, we performed RNAseq transcriptional profiling. In the experimental design, the wild-type, ΔppoA, and ΔppoC strains were grown in the liquid minimal medium for 16 h at 37 °C and then exposed to CAS 2 µg/mL for 1 h. Alternatively, the wild-type, OEppoA, and OEppoC were grown for 16 hrs in liquid minimal medium without any further exposure to CAS. The OEppoA and OEppoC have about 12− and 8-fold more ppoA mRNA accumulation and 17- and 6-fold more (at 16 and 24 h), respectively, than the wild type (Supplementary Figure S2). In both experimental designs, we focused on the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that have log2 fold changes of ≥1 and ≤−1 (an FDR of 0.05). Surprisingly, we were not able to identify any DEGs when comparing ΔppoA and OEppoA with the wild-type strain grown under the same conditions. In contrast, ΔppoC showed 52 and 68 DEGs that were down- and upregulated, respectively, in the presence of CAS. FunCat (Functional Catalog) (https://elbe.hki-jena.de/fungifun/fungifun.php, accessed on 29 September 2024) analyses for these DEGs [50] showed the transcriptional upregulation of genes coding for the proteins involved in secondary metabolism and non-ribosomal peptide synthesis, C-compound and carbohydrate transport, and cellular import (p-value < 0.01; Figure 2c and Table S1, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27134901). FunCat analysis for the downregulated genes showed enrichment for those genes also involved in secondary metabolism (p-value < 0.01; Figure 2c). When comparing the wild type with the OEppoC grown for 16 h without exposure to CAS, a total of 312 genes were downregulated and 580 genes were upregulated. FunCat analysis for these DEGs showed the transcriptional up- and downregulation of the genes coding for proteins involved in secondary metabolism and C-compound and carbohydrate transport (p-value < 0.01; Figure 2d and Table S2, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27134901). We did not observe ppoA, ppoB, and ppoC differential expression in either ΔppoC or OEppoC DEGs (Tables S1 and S2), suggesting that PpoC-altered levels do not affect the differential expression of these two genes.

We evaluated the impact of ppoC overexpression on secondary metabolite production by analyzing 5-day-cultured supernatants (grown at 37 °C) of the wild-type and OEppoC strains by liquid chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) analysis (Figure 2e). Several SMs, such as fumagillin, pseurotin A, fumigaclavine C, bisdethiobis(methylthio)gliotoxin, verruculogen, brevianamide F, and fumitremorgin C, showed increased production by the OEppoC strain when compared to the wild-type strain; surprisingly, no SM production had decreased in the OEppoC strain (Figure 2e).

Taken together, our transcriptomics and metabolomics analyses suggest that PpoC has a great impact on secondary metabolism. Previous studies in other Aspergillus spp., including A. nidulans and A. flavus [51,52], support a role for Ppo proteins in secondary metabolism.

3.3. PpoA and PpoC Share Common and Unique Proteomic Signatures

Our transcriptomic results with ΔppoA and OEppoA suggest that the main mode of action of oxylipins produced by PpoA is not at the transcriptional level. Accordingly, we performed proteomic analysis by growing the wild-type, ΔppoA, and ΔppoC strains in liquid MM + 0.1% (w/v) yeast extract for 16 h at 37 °C and adding either 2 µg/mL of caspofungin dissolved in DMSO or only DMSO (control) for an additional 2 h. We used label-free quantitative proteomics to investigate proteins that are differentially abundant in the ΔppoA and ΔppoC mutants after caspofungin stress. Differentially expressed proteins were defined as those with a minimum two-fold change in protein abundance (log2FC ≥ 1.0 and ≤−1.0; FDR of 0.05) when compared to the wild-type strain in the presence of CAS. There were 477 and 86 proteins that were up- and downregulated in ΔppoA, while 571 and 145 proteins were up- and downregulated in ΔppoC, respectively (Figure 3a). Venn diagram plotting of the proteins differentially expressed in ΔppoA and ΔppoC versus the wild-type strain in the presence of CAS revealed that the mutants shared 375 and 65 up- or downregulated proteins, respectively (Figure 3a). Mutant-specific proteomics responses showed 101 and 21 unique up- or downregulated proteins for ΔppoA and 196 and 80 unique up- or downregulated proteins for ΔppoC (Figure 3a). FunCat enrichment analysis for downregulated proteins in both mutant strains did not provide any enrichment; however, upregulated proteins in the ΔppoA and ΔppoC mutants showed enrichment for secondary metabolism and C-compound and carbohydrate metabolism (Figure 3b).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Proteomics for the wild type, ΔppoA, and ΔppoC. The wild type, ΔppoA, and ΔppoC strains were grown in liquid MM for 16 h at 37 °C and transferred to MM supplemented or not with 2 µg/mL of caspofungin for an additional 2 h. We used label-free quantitative proteomics to investigate those proteins that were differentially expressed. (a) Venn diagram showing the up- and downregulated proteins that are produced and shared or not by the ΔppoA and ΔppoC mutants. (b) FunCat categorization analysis, showing the differentially expressed proteins upregulated in the ΔppoA and ΔppoC mutants. (c) Heat map depicting the log2 fold change of differentially expressed proteins. Hierarchical clustering was performed in MeV (https://mev.tm4.org/, accessed on 29 September 2024) using Pearson’s correlation with complete linkage clustering. The results are the average of three independent biological repetitions.

We went through the list of proteins that were modulated either in both mutants or specifically in each mutant (Table 1, Figure 3c). The analysis of proteins concomitantly up-or downregulated in both the ΔppoA and ΔppoC mutants upon CAS stress revealed proteins involved in (i) calcium metabolism, such as AFUA_2G07630 (encoding a vacuolar calcium ion transporter) and AFUA_2G05325 (encoding a calcium/proton exchanger); (ii) cell wall metabolism, such as with AFUA_5G02290 (encoding an endo-chitinase), AFUA_4G09900 (encoding a cell wall biogenesis protein Ecm15), and AFUA_1G17250 (encoding a hydrophobin); (iii) carbohydrate metabolism, such as AFUA_4G14090 (encoding a UDP-glucose-4-epimerase) and AFUA_2G01840 (encoding a phosphoglycerate mutase); (iv) the regulation of processes (for example, transcription factors and signal transduction proteins), such as with AFUA_3G08010 (encoding a C2H2 transcription factor Ace1) and AFUA_4G10110 (encoding HtfA, a homeobox domain-containing protein); and (v) iron metabolism, such as with AFUA_3G03390, AFUA_3G03400, and AFUA_1G17190 (encoding SidJ, SidF, and SidI, respectively, which are important for siderophore biosynthesis) (Figure 3c).

Table 1.

List of proteins specifically modulated in the ΔppoA or ΔppoC mutants when compared with the wild type in the presence of caspofungin (CSP).

Protein ΔppoA/WT (CSP) *
AFUA_5G09580 (hydrophobin) 5.7621
AFUA_1G13670 (related to sporozoite surface protein 2) 3.3037
AFUA_7G01430 (NopA, Opsin) 3.9007
AFUA_1G02800 (chitinase) 1.5652
AFUA_6G08470 (glycerol kinase) 1.982
AFUA_1G05580 (glycogenin) 1.572
AFUA_8G02060 (N-acetylglucosaminylphosphatidylinositol deacetylase) 1.0966
AFUA_6G09930 (AP-1-like transcription factor yap1) 1.0689
AFUA_2G05730 (MFS siderochrome iron transporter C) 1.0328
AFUA_6G07270 (long-chain fatty acid transporter) 1.0156
AFUA_2G02520 (Cell polarity protein Tea1) −1.3091
AFUA_6G10480 (Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase-like 3) −1.9383
AFUA_4G06330 (C6 transcription factor) −12.169
Protein ΔppoC/WT (CSP) *
AFUA_4G10130 (alpha-amylase) 12.271
AFUA_1G09540 (vacuolar transporter chaperon Vtc1) 11.797
AFUA_7G06750 (phosphoglycerate mutase) 9.2397
AFUA_7G04020 (lipase) 8.2124
AFUA_8G05360 (FAS1 domain-containing protein) 8.0016
AFUA_5G09130 (polysaccharide deacetylase) 7.1757
AFUA_1G12040 (chitin synthase export chaperone) 6.4859
AFUA_8G00230 (verruculogen synthase) 4.8539
AFUA_2G17580 (scytalone dehydratase arp1) 4.2638
AFUA_2G17530 (laccase abr2) 4.2588
AFUA_1G16410 (C6 transcription factor) 2.3637
AFUA_1G11000 (C6 transcription factor) 2.1857
AFUA_2G17560 (hydroxynaphthalene reductase arp2) 1.4489
AFUA_6G00750 (pyruvate decarboxylase) 1.4218
AFUA_5G12550 (N-acetylglucosaminylphosphatidylinositol deacetylase) 1.3624
AFUA_6G01840 (C6 transcription factor) 1.3588
AFUA_5G05600 (forkhead transcription factor Sep1) 1.3116
AFUA_1G17080 (glucosamine 6-phosphate N-acetyltransferase) 1.2597
AFUA_3G08820 (glycosyl hydrolase) 1.0264
AFUA_3G01530 (Phosphatidylglycerol specific phospholipase) 1.3353
AFUA_3G09950 (phospholipid:diacylglycerol acyltransferase) 1.2213
AFUA_6G07570 (palmitoyltransferase swf1) 1.213
AFUA_4G04200 (myo-inositol-1(Or 4)-monophosphatase) 1.1101
AFUA_1G09670 (HLH transcription factor GlcD gamma) 1.0999
AFUA_5G09070 (glycosyltransferase family 8 protein) 1.0634
AFUA_2G11860 (lipoprotein) 1.0475
AFUA_4G12180 (C6 transcription factor Prf) −1.076
AFUA_2G04210 (L-tyrosine degradation gene cluster protein hmgX) −1.2644
AFUA_3G00370 (phosphoketolase) −1.4249
AFUA_1G09940 (casein kinase II beta 2 subunit) −2.112
AFUA_7G08350 (alpha-1,3-glucanase) −2.4887
AFUA_7G04800 (G-protein coupled receptor GprC) −5.5981
AFUA_4G06940 (sphingolipid 4-desaturase) −9.4216

* Differentially expressed proteins were defined as those with a minimum two-fold change in protein abundance (log2FC ≥ 1.0 and ≤−1.0; FDR of 0.05) when compared to the wild-type strain in the presence of CAS.

The analysis showed that protein up- and downregulation, specifically in ΔppoA and ΔppoC, was revealed in ΔppoA, AFUA_7G01430 (encoding NopA, opsin), AFUA_1G02800 (encoding a chitinase), AFUA_2G05730 (encoding an MFS siderochrome iron transporter C), and in ΔppoC, AFUA_8G00230 (encoding a verruculogen synthase), AFUA_7G04800 (encoding a G-protein coupled receptor GprC), and AFUA_4G06940 (encoding a sphingolipid-4-desaturase) (Table 1).

We tested selected mutants for transcription factors (TFs), a protein phosphatase, and two GPCRs for their susceptibility to inhibitory and CPE CAS concentrations of 0.25 µg/mL and 8.0 µg/mL, respectively (Figure 4a,b). We observed that the TF mutants AFUA_2G02540, AFUA_5G00290, AFUA_5G07510, AFUA_4G10340, AFUA_6G07010, AFUA_1G11000, and AFUA_1G16410 were more resistant to both CAS concentrations of 0.25 µg/mL and 8.0 µg/mL (Figure 4a,b). In contrast, AFUA_2G05310 and AFUA_4G10110 were more resistant to only 0.25 µg/mL of CAS, and AFUA_4G09710 was only more resistant to CAS 8.0 µg/mL (Figure 4a,b). We have identified that ΔppsA (ppsA encodes a protein phosphatase that is the homolog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae PPS1 protein phosphatase, which plays a role in the DNA synthesis phase of the cell cycle (https://www.yeastgenome.org/locus/S000000480, accessed on 29 September 2024), being more susceptible to both CAS concentrations of 0.25 µg/mL and 8.0 µg/mL (Figure 4a,b).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Growth phenotypes of A. fumigatus null mutants. (a) Inhibitory CAS concentrations of 0.25 µg/mL. (b) CPE concentrations of CAS of 8 µg/mL. The wild-type and the mutants were grown in MM or MM + CAS for 5 days at 37 °C. The results are expressed as radial growth on MM + CAS divided by MM, and are the average of three independent biological repetitions ± the standard deviation of three repetitions. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. The corresponding p-values are shown in the embedded graph.

Taken together, these results suggest that upon CAS stress, PpoA and PpoC affect the accumulation of the proteins involved in the cell wall, carbohydrate, calcium, and SM metabolism. Several TF mutants and a protein phosphatase were validated as being involved in CAS susceptibility.

3.4. Molecular Characterization of Two Clinical Isolates That Have Contrasting Responses to Caspofungin: CM7555 and IFM61407

We have previously reported the occurrence of two clinical A. fumigatus isolates, CM7555 and IFM61407, which exhibit decreased and increased susceptibility to CAS, respectively [53,54] (Figure 5a). CM7555 is more resistant to CR and CFW than IFM61407, but both showed the same susceptibility to osmotic stress induced by increasing concentrations of sorbitol (Figure 5b,c). Both clinical isolates showed comparable ppoA and ppoC mRNA accumulation when they were exposed to different CAS concentrations (Figure 5d,e). We previously reported that the clinical isolate Af293 showed increased accumulation of 5-diHODE and 8-HODE when exposed to CAS [24] (Figure 5f,g). We evaluated whether the differential CAS susceptibility of CM7555 and IFM61407 could be linked to the production of a different oxylipin in the presence of CAS (Figure 5g,h). IFM61407 had increased levels of 5,8-diHODE and 8-HODE when exposed to CAS 2.0 µg/mL (Figure 5h,i). CM7555 showed slightly increased production of 5,8-diHODE but comparable 8-HODE when exposed to CAS (Figure 5h,i). A longer time of exposure to CAS induced much higher MpkA phosphorylation in CM7555 than in IFM61407 (Figure 5j), and the same behavior was also observed for PKA activity (Figure 5k).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Characterization of the clinical isolates CM7555 and IFM61407. (ac) Radial growth in the CM7555 and IFM61407 clinical isolates grown for 5 days at 37 °C on solid MM and MM + different concentrations of CAS, CR, CFW, or sorbitol. The results are expressed as the radial growth of the treatment, divided by the radial growth of the control, and are the average of three independent biological repetitions ± standard deviation. (d,e) RTqPCR analysis for the ppoA and ppoC genes. CM7555 and IFM61407 were grown for 16 h in liquid MM at 37 °C and transferred or not to MM + different CAS concentrations for 1 h. The results are the average of three independent biological repetitions ± standard deviation. (fi) Oxylipin production, as measured by ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS). Af293, CM7555, and IFM61407 were grown for 24 h in liquid MM at 37 °C and transferred to MM + 2 µg/mL for an additional 48 h. (j) Western blot analysis for MpkA phosphorylation. The same experimental designs as for (d,e) were used for this experiment. (k) The strains were grown as described in (j), and the samples were processed according to the PKA colorimetric activity kit (https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/br/pt/EIAPKA, accessed on 29 September 2024) and normalized using the total protein. The results are the average of three independent biological experiments ± standard deviation.

To identify the possible differences between CM7555 and IFM61407, we assembled the genomes of these two strains and also performed RNAseq transcriptional profiling. Both strains had genome sizes, GC content, and mitochondrial genomes that were comparable to the Af293 reference strain (Table 2).

Table 2.

Main data about the genome sequencing of two A. fumigatus clinical isolates.

Nuclear Genome Mitogenome
Assembly Contigs Largest Contig Total Length GC (%) N50 Total Length GC (%)
Af293 8 4918979 29384958 49.80 3948441 31765 25.38
CM7555 422 592903 28732111 49.53 210887 31750 25.38
IFM61407 998 982941 30706367 48.74 228020 31751 25.38

Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis revealed 20 SNPs in 17 genes when CM7555 was compared to IFM61407; Af293 is used as a reference genome strain (Table 3). None of these genes had previously been identified as involved in fungal drug resistance or, more specifically, in CAS tolerance/resistance. Therefore, additional studies had to be performed to validate their involvement in these processes.

Table 3.

Characterization of the SNPs associated with CAS susceptibility.

CM7555 IFM61407 Chromosome Position Ref Alt Gene Variant Type Function
X NC_007195.1 1182496 G A Afu2g04280 upstream_gene_variant asparaginase, putative
X NC_007196.1 3242018 T C Afu3g12290 5_prime_UTR_variant pre-mRNA splicing factor Dim1
X NC_007196.1 3242454 A C Afu3g12300 5_prime_UTR_variant 60S ribosomal protein L22, putative
X NC_007196.1 3511190 C T Afu3g13230 missense_variant AT DNA binding protein, putative
X NC_007196.1 3512039 G A Afu3g13230 missense_variant AT DNA binding protein, putative
X NC_007196.1 3514244 T C Afu3g13230 upstream_gene_variant AT DNA binding protein, putative
X NC_007196.1 3519307 G A Afu3g13260 synonymous_variant Rad2-like endonuclease, putative
X NC_007196.1 3520699 G T Afu3g13260 synonymous_variant Rad2-like endonuclease, putative
X NC_007196.1 3528767 C T Afu3g13300 missense_variant hypothetical protein
X NC_007196.1 3543581 T A Afu3g13390 3_prime_UTR_variant vacuolar ATP synthase subunit d, putative
X NC_007196.1 3546410 C T Afu3g13400 synonymous_variant nucleolar protein nop5
X NC_007198.1 2400034 T C Afu5g09320 synonymous_variant signal transduction protein Syg1, putative
X NC_007198.1 2799527 G A Afu5g10940 upstream_gene_variant hypothetical protein
X X NC_007198.1 3545720 A G Afu5g13510 missense_variant cell cycle control protein (Cwf8), putative
X NC_007199.1 1516436 C T Afu6g06880 3_prime_UTR_variant negative regulator of DNA transposition (Rtt106), putative
X NC_007199.1 1736813 T C Afu6g07640 synonymous_variant lysyl-tRNA synthetase
X NC_007200.1 371671 C T Afu7g01430 upstream_gene_variant opsin, putative
X X NC_007200.1 374641 T C Afu7g01440 missense_variant hypothetical protein
X NC_007200.1 409263 C A Afu7g01560 synonymous_variant FAD dependent oxidoreductase, putative
X X NC_007200.1 532236 T A Afu7g01970 missense_variant RTA1 domain protein, putative

For the RNAseq experimental design, CM7555 and IFM61407 clinical isolates were grown in liquid minimal medium for 16 h at 37 °C and then exposed to CAS 2 µg/mL for 1 h. We concentrated our attention on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that have a log2 fold of ≥1 and ≤1 (FDR of 0.05) when we compared CM7555 with the IFM61407 strains. CM7555, compared to the IFM61407 strains, showed 419 and 216 DEGs down- and upregulated, respectively, in the absence of CAS, and 936 and 370 DEGs down- and upregulated, respectively, in the presence of CAS. FunCat analysis for these DEGs in the absence of CAS showed the transcriptional downregulation of genes coding for proteins involved in C-compound and carbohydrate metabolism and secondary metabolism and in the C-compound and carbohydrate transport and the upregulation of secondary metabolism and siderophore-iron transport (p-value < 0.01; Figure 6a and Table S3, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27134901).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Differentially expressed genes in CM7555 and IFM61407 clinical isolates are enriched for secondary metabolite and carbohydrate metabolism. (a,b) FunCat categorization analysis, showing the differentially expressed genes up- and downregulated in CM7555/IFM61407 clinical isolates in the presence and absence of CAS. (c) Heat map depicting the relative quantification divided by dry weight of differentially expressed secondary metabolites identified by mass spectrometry. Hierarchical clustering was performed in MeV (htpp://mev.tm4.org/, accessed on 29 September 2024), using Pearson’s correlation with complete linkage clustering. The results are the average of three independent biological repetitions.

FunCat analysis for the DEGs in the presence of CAS showed the transcriptional downregulation of genes coding for proteins involved in secondary metabolism and the upregulation of transporters and secondary metabolism (p-value < 0.01; Figure 6b and Table S3, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27134901).

We evaluated the secondary metabolite production in these two clinical isolates by analyzing 4-day-cultured supernatants (grown in MM for 24 h and then supplemented with 2 µg/mL of CAS for 96 h at 37 °C) by LC-HRMS analysis (Figure 6c). Several SMs, such as demethoxyfumitremorgin C, trypostatin B, and spirotrypostatin A showed higher levels in the presence of CAS in the CM7555 than in the IFM61407 clinical isolate (Figure 6c). In contrast, other compounds such as brevianamide F, pseurotin, monomethyl sulochrin, and pyripyropene F were more strongly induced in the presence of CAS in IFM61407 than in the CM7555 clinical isolate (Figure 6c).

Taken together, these results suggest that the decreased CAS susceptibility of CM7555 clinical isolate is due to an increased response in the CWI pathway and PKA activity. There is some contribution made by the oxylipin pathway, but it does not seem to have the strongest influence on the difference in susceptibility to CAS. Once more, we observed a correlation between the modulation of the genes encoding proteins related to carbohydrate and SM metabolism and CAS susceptibility.

4. Discussion

There are very few antifungal drugs available against A. fumigatus infections. One of them, CAS, is a fungistatic drug used as second-line therapy. Our group has been investigating the mechanisms of CAS tolerance and how to potentiate its activity [23,34,53,54,55,56,57,58]. There is a close connection between CAS tolerance mechanisms and the activation of several signal transduction pathways, such as the CWI pathway, calcium/calmodulin/calcineurin, and protein kinase A [23,47,48,49]. We have previously shown that the treatment of A. fumigatus reference strains Af293 and CEA17 with its endogenous signaling oxylipin 5,8-diHODE resulted in the same three morphological responses being elicited by CAS (hyperbranching, increased septation, and increased chitin content in the cell wall) but without the occurrence of tip lysis [59]. Recently, we demonstrated that CAS tolerance in both reference strains of A. fumigatus is mediated through the inducible oxylipin signal 5,8-diHODE [24]. We have shown that the A. fumigatus response to 5,8-diHODE (produced by PpoA) requires TF ZfpA. It is an effector of CAS-mediated lysis since ΔzfpA is hypersusceptible to caspofungin, while the overexpression of ZfpA resulted in germlings that were highly tolerant to caspofungin [24,59]. Interestingly, the protective response to 5,8-diHODE does not require the TF CrzA, but the survival of the ΔmpkA mutant in the presence of CAS was still significantly improved by 5,8-diHODE [24]. In summary, we proposed that CAS and 5,8-diHODE synergistically activate chitin biosynthesis, aiming to construct a stronger cell wall with hyphal tips that are resistant to CAS-mediated lysis [24].

Here, we extended these studies by directly investigating the participation of ppo genes in CAS tolerance and concentrating our studies on the reference strain Af293. PpoA and PpoC have a heterogeneous and complex involvement in CAS tolerance and CPE. We focused our efforts on understanding the roles of PpoA and PpoC by using several different strategies. PpoA and PpoC are involved in the modulation of MpkA phosphorylation and PKA activity upon CAS exposure. This reinforces the idea of the control of the CWI pathway by PpoA and introduces the idea that oxylipins also modulate PKA activity. Actually, we have shown that PKA and the high-osmolarity glycerol (HOG) response pathways cooperatively control cell wall carbohydrate mobilization in A. fumigatus [47]. It is not clear if PpoA and PpoC are directly phosphorylated by either MpkA and/or PKA. The PpoA and PpoC phophosphorylation sites (as predicted by https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/services/NetPhos-3.1/, access on 29 Sptember 2024 showed 4 and 16 sites for MpkA (p38MAPK) and 1 and 17 sites for PKA for PpoA and PpoC, respectively (Supplementary Text S1). It remains to be determined if these PpoA and PpoC residues are functional and are phosphorylated by MpkA and PKA.

Surprisingly, the transcriptional profiling of ppoA mutants using RNAseq did not provide a significant number of DEGs, but RNAseq analysis with ppoC mutants indicated category enrichment for those DEGs related to SM production and carbohydrate metabolism. Both MpkA and PKA are important for SM production and carbohydrate metabolism and the fact that PpoC is modulating these pathways could suggest that oxylipins are important for controlling these pathways. Considering that glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) is the precursor for UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-N-GlcNAc), the main building block of fungal chitin [60], it is possible that the effect on carbohydrate metabolism is impacting the activation of chitin biosynthesis. The control of SMs by oxylipins raises the possibility that oxylipins could also modulate other pathways that are related to fungal defense and/or signaling, a finding that complements previous studies on other Aspergilli [51,52].

We also investigated the differential expression of proteins in the ΔppoA and ΔppoC mutants exposed to CAS. Once more, category enrichment revealed the involvement of proteins related to secondary and carbohydrate metabolism. Additionally, we identified several proteins that are involved in calcium metabolism and in the CWI pathway. More interestingly, the regulation of the production of many of these proteins is concomitantly affected by both PpoA and PpoC, suggesting that both proteins are collaborating during pathway modulation. We validated the growth of the null mutants of several of the genes encoding TFs and signal transduction proteins in the presence of CAS and identified some mutants that have an altered susceptibility to CAS. It is currently not known how oxylipins induce the A. fumigatus downstream pathways. Oxylipins are produced intracellularly and later secreted. They could be reabsorbed in different parts of the hyphae and affect signaling through binding to endogenous or surface receptors. Interestingly, we identified two G-protein coupled receptors, GprC (AFUA_7G04800) and NopA (AFUA_7G01430), as being differentially expressed in the ppo mutants. Further characterization of these mutants is necessary to confirm if they are oxylipin effectors and if the GPCR proteins could be direct targets for oxylipins.

Aiming to characterize whether other clinical isolates that are different from our reference strains, Af293 and CEA17, also have their CAS susceptibility impacted by oxylipins, we characterized two clinical isolates, CM7555 (CAS-resistant) and IFM41607 (CAS-sensitive), which have extreme CAS sensitivity and CAS resistance. Surprisingly, IFM61407 is CAS-sensitive but still can produce oxylipins in the presence of CAS, while CM7555 is highly CAS-resistant and cannot produce oxylipins in the presence of CAS. As expected, the CWI pathway is more fully activated in the CM7555 strain since this strain is more resistant to cell-wall-damaging agents and shows increased MpkA phosphorylation and PKA activity. These results suggest that although oxylipins are important as modulators of CAS tolerance, they are not the only mechanism involved in this process. We need to assess the relationship between CAS tolerance and oxylipin production in a more significant number of clinical isolates to establish the contribution made by oxylipins to this process. We sequenced the genomes of both strains, aiming to identify possible differences that could help to explain additional mechanisms of CAS tolerance. We identified several statistically significant SNPs that are associated with CAS susceptibility and their further characterization will help to establish if these genes are involved in CAS susceptibility. We also exposed these two strains to CAS and investigated their transcriptional expression using RNAseq. Once more, carbohydrate metabolism and secondary metabolites are differentially expressed in both strains.

Antifungal drug resistance has been extensively studied [4]. However, drug tolerance and persistence are widely described for bacteria and are increasingly being examined for yeast-like organisms, but they are poorly defined for filamentous fungi [54]. Recently, we demonstrated that because all spores derived from an individual strain were phenotypically indistinct with respect to CPE, it is likely that CPE is a genetically encoded adaptive trait that should be considered an antifungal-tolerant phenotype [54]. Herein, we clearly demonstrated that CAS tolerance is a very complex and multifactorial process that involves not only oxylipins but also the modulation of several other signaling pathways. The study of which pathways are prevalent and how they are integrated could help us to understand how fungi can cope with stressing situations; this study can contribute to new strategies of antifungal drug development that could minimize the impact of antifungal drug resistance.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Marcela Savoldi, and Lívia Alfaya for their technical help in the experiments.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27134901, Figure S1: Southern blot results of the confirmed strains; Figure S2: ppoA and ppoC mRNA accumulation in the OEppoA and OEppoC strains; Table S1: Differential gene expression between ΔppoC and the wild type exposed to caspofungin; Table S2: Differential gene expression between OEppoC and the wild type; Table S3: Differentially expressed genes when CM7555 and IFM61407 were exposed or not exposed to CAS; Table S4: Primers used in the current study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.H.G.; formal analysis, E.D.; investigation, E.D., P.A.d.C., D.G.C., N.M., E.D., D.Y.A., J.G.P., T.F., T.K., O.K., A.A.B., and K.H.W.; data curation, E.D., M.A.C.H., and T.K.; writing—original draft preparation, G.H.G.; writing—review and editing, all the authors; supervision, G.H.G., N.P.K., and A.A.B.; project administration, G.H.G.; funding acquisition, G.H.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw reads generated by Illumina were deposited on the NCBI’s GenBank database under the following SRA IDs: SRR28432704 to SRR28432733 (BioProject accession PRJNA1091189). The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited at the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE [61] partner repository, with the dataset identifier PXD054599 (Project Name: The influence of Aspergillus fumigatus fatty acid oxygenases PpoA and PpoC on caspofungin susceptibility; Project accession: PXD054599). Reviewer account details: Username: reviewer_pxd054599@ebi.ac.uk; Password: AhWy4h01YNXB.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) 2021/04977-5 (GHG), 2023/00206-0 (ED), and 2022/02992-0 (TF), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) grant numbers 301058/2019-9, 404735/2018-5, and 405934/2022-0 (The National Institute of Science and Technology (INCT) Funvir and Fundação Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento do Pessoal do Ensino Superior, (CAPES)), from Brazil (GHG), and also a National Institutes of Health National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grant (R01AI153356) from the United States. This work was also funded by the Joint Canada-Israel Health Research Program, jointly supported by the Azrieli Foundation, Canada’s International Development Research Centre, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the Israel Science Foundation (GHG). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of IDRC or its Board of Governors.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Taccone F.S., Van den Abeele A.M., Bulpa P., Misset B., Meersseman W., Cardoso T., Paiva J.A., Blasco-Navalpotro M., De Laere E., Dimopoulos G., et al. Epidemiology of invasive aspergillosis in critically ill patients: Clinical presentation, underlying conditions, and outcomes. Crit. Care. 2015;19:7. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0722-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Koehler P., Cornely O.A., Böttiger B.W., Dusse F., Eichenauer D.A., Fuchs F., Hallek M., Jung N., Klein F., Persigehl T., et al. COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis. Mycoses. 2020;63:528–534. doi: 10.1111/myc.13096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hoenigl M., Seidel D., Sprute R., Cunha C., Oliverio M., Goldman G.H., Ibrahim A.S., Carvalho A. COVID-19-associated fungal infections. Nat. Microbiol. 2022;7:1127–1140. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01172-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Puumala E., Fallah S., Robbins N., Cowen L.E. Advancements and challenges in antifungal therapeutic development. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2024;37:e0014223. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00142-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brüggemann R.J., Alffenaar J.W., Blijlevens N.M., Billaud E.M., Kosterink J.G., Verweij P.E., Burger D.M. Clinical relevance of the pharmacokinetic interactions of azole antifungal drugs with other coadministered agents. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009;48:1441–1458. doi: 10.1086/598327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mellado E., Diaz-Guerra T.M., Cuenca-Estrella M., Rodriguez-Tudela J.L. Identification of Two Different 14-α Sterol Demethylase-Related Genes (cyp51A and cyp51B) in Aspergillus fumigatus and Other Aspergillus species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001;39:2431–2438. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2431-2438.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bolard J. How Do the Polyene Macrolide Antibiotics Affect the Cellular Membrane-Properties. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1986;864:257–304. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(86)90002-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Anderson T.M., Clay M.C., Cioffi A.G., Diaz K.A., Hisao G.S., Tuttle M.D., Nieuwkoop A.J., Comellas G., Maryum N., Wang S., et al. Amphotericin forms an extramembranous and fungicidal sterol sponge. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014;10:400–406. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Latgé J.P., Chamilos G. Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis in 2019. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019;33:e00140-18. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00140-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Deresinski S.C., Stevens D.A. Caspofungin. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003;36:1445–1457. doi: 10.1086/375080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moreno-Velásquez S.D., Seidel C., Juvvadi P.R., Steinbach W.J., Read N.D. Caspofungin-Mediated Growth Inhibition and Paradoxical Growth in Aspergillus fumigatus Involve Fungicidal Hyphal Tip Lysis Coupled with Regenerative Intrahyphal Growth and Dynamic Changes in β-1,3-Glucan Synthase Localization. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e00710-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00710-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Arendrup M.C., Mavridou E., Mortensen K.L., Snelders E., Frimodt-Møller N., Khan H., Melchers W.J., Verweij P.E. Development of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus during azole therapy associated with change in virulence. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e10080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stevens D.A., Kullberg B.J., Brummer E., Casadevall A., Netea M.G., Sugar A.M. Combined treatment: Antifungal drugs with antibodies; cytokines or drugs. Med. Mycol. 2000;38((Suppl. S1)):305–315. doi: 10.1080/mmy.38.s1.305.315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wagener J., Loiko V. Recent Insights into the Paradoxical Effect of Echinocandins. J. Fungi. 2017;4:5. doi: 10.3390/jof4010005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Altwasser R., Baldin C., Weber J., Guthke R., Kniemeyer O., Brakhage A.A., Linde J., Valiante V. Network Modeling Reveals Cross Talk of MAP Kinases during Adaptation to Caspofungin Stress in Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0136932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Juvvadi P.R., Lamoth F., Steinbach W.J. Calcineurin as a multifunctional regulator: Unraveling novel functions in fungal stress responses, hyphal growth, drug resistance, and pathogenesis. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2014;28:56–69. doi: 10.1016/j.fbr.2014.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Soriani F.M., Malavazi I., da Silva Ferreira M.E., Savoldi M., Von Zeska Kress M.R., de Souza Goldman M.H., Loss O., Bignell E., Goldman G.H. Functional characterization of the Aspergillus fumigatus CRZ1 homologue, CrzA. Mol. Microbiol. 2008;67:1274–1291. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06122.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Juvvadi P.R., Muñoz A., Lamoth F., Soderblom E.J., Moseley M.A., Read N.D., Steinbach W.J. Calcium-Mediated Induction of Paradoxical Growth following Caspofungin Treatment Is Associated with Calcineurin Activation and Phosphorylation in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015;59:4946–4955. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00263-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fortwendel J.R., Juvvadi P.R., Perfect B.Z., Rogg L.E., Perfect J.R., Steinbach W.J. Transcriptional regulation of chitin synthases by calcineurin controls paradoxical growth of Aspergillus fumigatus in response to caspofungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010;54:1555–1563. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00854-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Aruanno M., Glampedakis E., Lamoth F. Echinocandins for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis: From laboratory to bedside. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e00399-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00399-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Aruanno M., Bachmann D., Sanglard D., Lamoth F. Link between Heat Shock Protein 90 and the Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain in the Caspofungin Stress Response of Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e00208-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00208-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Satish S., Jiménez-Ortigosa C., Zhao Y., Lee M.H., Dolgov E., Krüger T., Park S., Denning D.W., Kniemeyer O., Brakhage A.A., et al. Stress-Induced Changes in the Lipid Microenvironment of beta-(1,3)-d-Glucan Synthase Cause Clinically Important Echinocandin Resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. mBio. 2019;10:e00779-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00779-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ries L.N.A., Rocha M.C., de Castro P.A., Silva-Rocha R., Silva R.N., Freitas F.Z., de Assis L.J., Bertolini M.C., Malavazi I., Goldman G.H. The Aspergillus fumigatus CrzA Transcription Factor Activates Chitin Synthase Gene Expression during the Caspofungin Paradoxical Effect. mBio. 2017;8:e00705-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00705-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Calise D.G., Park S.C., Bok J.W., Goldman G.H., Keller N.P. An oxylipin signal confers protection against antifungal echinocandins in pathogenic aspergilli. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:3770. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48231-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Garscha U., Jernerén F., Chung D., Keller N.P., Hamberg M., Oliw E.H. Identification of dioxygenases required for Aspergillus development. Studies of products, stereochemistry, and the reaction mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:34707–34718. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M705366200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kafer E. Meiotic and mitotic recombination in Aspergillus and its chromosomal aberrations. Adv. Genet. 1977;19:33–131. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2660(08)60245-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xue T., Nguyen C.K., Romans A., Kontoyiannis D.P., May G.S. Isogenic auxotrophic mutant strains in the Aspergillus fumigatus genome reference strain AF293. Arch. Microbiol. 2004;182:346–353. doi: 10.1007/s00203-004-0707-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Almaliki H.S., Niu M., Keller N.P., Yin G., Bennett J.W. Mutational Analysis of Aspergillus fumigatus Volatile Oxylipins in a Drosophila Eclosion Assay. J. Fungi. 2023;9:402. doi: 10.3390/jof9040402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sekonyela R., Palmer J.M., Bok J.W., Jain S., Berthier E., Forseth R., Schroeder F., Keller N.P. RsmA regulates Aspergillus fumigatus gliotoxin cluster metabolites including cyclo(L-Phe-L-Ser), a potential new diagnostic marker for invasive aspergillosis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e62591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Osherov N., Kontoyiannis D.P., Romans A., May G.S. Resistance to itraconazole in Aspergillus nidulans and Aspergillus fumigatus is conferred by extra copies of the A. nidulans P-450 14alpha-demethylase gene, pdmA. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2001;48:75–81. doi: 10.1093/jac/48.1.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Soukup A.A., Farnoodian M., Berthier E., Keller N.P. NosA, a transcription factor important in Aspergillus fumigatus stress and developmental response, rescues the germination defect of a laeA deletion. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2012;49:857–865. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2012.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lim F.Y., Sanchez J.F., Wang C.C., Keller N.P. Toward awakening cryptic secondary metabolite gene clusters in filamentous fungi. Methods Enzymol. 2012;517:303–324. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-404634-4.00015-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Szewczyk E., Nayak T., Oakley C.E., Edgerton H., Xiong Y., Taheri-Talesh N., Osmani S.A., Oakley B.R. Fusion PCR and gene targeting in Aspergillus nidulans. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1:3111. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.de Castro P.A., Colabardini A.C., Manfiolli A.O., Chiaratto J., Silva L.P., Mattos E.C., Palmisano G., Almeida F., Persinoti G.F., Ries L.N.A., et al. Aspergillus fumigatus calcium-responsive transcription factors regulate cell wall architecture promoting stress tolerance, virulence and caspofungin resistance. PLoS Genet. 2019;15:e1008551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Andrews S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. Babraham Institute; Babraham, UK: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bolger A.M., Lohse M., Usadel B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Andrey P., Dmitry A., Dmitry M., Alla L., Anton K. Using SPAdes De Novo Assembler. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2020;70:e102. doi: 10.1002/cpbi.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gurevich A., Saveliev V., Vyahhi N., Tesler G. QUAST: Quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kopylova E., Noé L., Touzet H. SortMeRNA: Fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3211–3217. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kim D., Paggi J.M., Park C., Bennett C., Salzberg S.L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37:907–915. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Danecek P., Bonfield J.K., Liddle J., Marshall J., Ohan V., Pollard M.O., Whitwham A., Keane T., McCarthy S.A., Davies R.M., et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience. 2021;10:giab008. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liao Y., Smyth G.K., Shi W. FeatureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:923–930. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Robinson M.D., McCarthy D.J., Smyth G.K. EdgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139–140. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Anders S., McCarthy D.J., Chen Y., Okoniewski M., Smyth G.K., Huber W., Robinson M.D. Count-based differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing data using R and Bioconductor. Nat. Protoc. 2013;8:1765–1786. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wessel D., Flügge U.I. A method for the quantitative recovery of protein in dilute solution in the presence of detergents and lipids. Anal. Biochem. 1984;138:141–143. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(84)90782-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tsitsigiannis D.I., Bok J.W., Andes D., Nielsen K.F., Frisvad J.C., Keller N.P. Aspergillus cyclooxygenase-like enzymes are associated with prostaglandin production and virulence. Infect. Immun. 2005;73:4548–4559. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.8.4548-4559.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.de Assis L.J., Manfiolli A., Mattos E., Fabri J.H.T.M., Malavazi I., Jacobsen I.D., Brock M., Cramer R.A., Thammahong A., Hagiwara D., et al. Protein Kinase A and High-Osmolarity Glycerol Response Pathways Cooperatively Control Cell Wall Carbohydrate Mobilization in Aspergillus fumigatus. mBio. 2018;9:e01952-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01952-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Silva L.P., Frawley D., Assis L.J., Tierney C., Fleming A.B., Bayram O., Goldman G.H. Putative Membrane Receptors Contribute to Activation and Efficient Signaling of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Cascades during Adaptation of Aspergillus fumigatus to Different Stressors and Carbon Sources. mSphere. 2020;5:e00818-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00818-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mattos E.C., Silva L.P., Valero C., de Castro P.A., Dos Reis T.F., Ribeiro L.F.C., Marten M.R., Silva-Rocha R., Westmann C., da Silva C.H.T.P., et al. The Aspergillus fumigatus Phosphoproteome Reveals Roles of High-Osmolarity Glycerol Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases in Promoting Cell Wall Damage and Caspofungin Tolerance. mBio. 2020;11:e02962-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02962-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Priebe S., Kreisel C., Horn F., Guthke R., Linde J. FungiFun2: A comprehensive online resource for systematic analysis of gene lists from fungal species. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:445–446. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tsitsigiannis D.I., Keller N.P. Oxylipins act as determinants of natural product biosynthesis and seed colonization in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Microbiol. 2006;59:882–892. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.05000.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Brown S.H., Scott J.B., Bhaheetharan J., Sharpee W.C., Milde L., Wilson R.A., Keller N.P. Oxygenase coordination is required for morphological transition and the host-fungus interaction of Aspergillus flavus. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2009;22:882–894. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-7-0882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhao S., Martin-Vicente A., Colabardini A.C., Pereira Silva L., Rinker D.C., Fortwendel J.R., Goldman G.H., Gibbons J.G. Genomic and Molecular Identification of Genes Contributing to the Caspofungin Paradoxical Effect in Aspergillus fumigatus. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022;10:e0051922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00519-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Valero C., Colabardini A.C., de Castro P.A., Amich J., Bromley M.J., Goldman G.H. The Caspofungin Paradoxical Effect is a Tolerant “Eagle Effect” in the Filamentous Fungal Pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. mBio. 2022;13:e0044722. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00447-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mattos E.C., Palmisano G., Goldman G.H. Phosphoproteomics of Aspergillus fumigatus Exposed to the Antifungal Drug Caspofungin. mSphere. 2020;5:e00365-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00365-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Valero C., Colabardini A.C., Chiaratto J., Pardeshi L., de Castro P.A., Ferreira Filho J.A., Silva L.P., Rocha M.C., Malavazi I., Costa J.H., et al. Aspergillus fumigatus Transcription Factors Involved in the Caspofungin Paradoxical Effect. mBio. 2020;11:e00816-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00816-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Colabardini A.C., Wang F., Dong Z., Pardeshi L., Rocha M.C., Costa J.H., Dos Reis T.F., Brown A., Jaber Q.Z., Fridman M., et al. Heterogeneity in the transcriptional response of the human pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus to the antifungal agent caspofungin. Genetics. 2022;220:iyab183. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyab183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Colabardini A.C., Van Rhijn N., LaBella A.L., Valero C., Dineen L., Rokas A., Goldman G.H. Aspergillus fumigatus FhdA Transcription Factor Is Important for Mitochondrial Activity and Codon Usage Regulation during the Caspofungin Paradoxical Effect. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2022;66:e0070122. doi: 10.1128/aac.00701-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Niu M., Steffan B.N., Fischer G.J., Venkatesh N., Raffa N.L., Wettstein M.A., Bok J.W., Greco C., Zhao C., Berthier E., et al. Fungal oxylipins direct programmed developmental switches in filamentous fungi. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:5158. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18999-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Brauer V.S., Pessoni A.M., Freitas M.S., Cavalcanti-Neto M.P., Ries L.N.A., Almeida F. Chitin Biosynthesis in Aspergillus Species. J. Fungi. 2023;9:89. doi: 10.3390/jof9010089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Perez-Riverol Y., Bai J., Bandla C., García-Seisdedos D., Hewapathirana S., Kamatchinathan S., Kundu D.J., Prakash A., Frericks-Zipper A., Eisenacher M., et al. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: A hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D543–D552. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The raw reads generated by Illumina were deposited on the NCBI’s GenBank database under the following SRA IDs: SRR28432704 to SRR28432733 (BioProject accession PRJNA1091189). The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited at the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE [61] partner repository, with the dataset identifier PXD054599 (Project Name: The influence of Aspergillus fumigatus fatty acid oxygenases PpoA and PpoC on caspofungin susceptibility; Project accession: PXD054599). Reviewer account details: Username: reviewer_pxd054599@ebi.ac.uk; Password: AhWy4h01YNXB.


Articles from Journal of Fungi are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES