Skip to main content
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2024 Nov 13;29(22):5332. doi: 10.3390/molecules29225332

Silybin Derivatives Produced by γ-Irradiation and Their Tyrosinase Inhibitory Activities

Ah-Reum Han 1,, Hyung Won Ryu 2,, Chang Hyun Jin 1,*
Editors: Iwona Ścibisz, Mariola Kozłowska, Małgorzata Ziarno
PMCID: PMC11596366  PMID: 39598721

Abstract

Silybin, which belongs to the flavonolignan group, is the major component of the fruit extract of Silybum marianum (common name: milk thistle). Silybin is a medicinal compound with hepatoprotective, antioxidant, and anticancer properties. In this study, silybin derivatives were produced through γ-radiolysis, and their tyrosinase inhibitory activities were evaluated to explore the enhanced activities of silybin derivatives compared to silybin (1). Isosilandrin (2) and 2,3-dehydrosilybin (3) were obtained from a silybin sample irradiated at 300 kGy. The optimal dose showed significant changes in radiolysis product content. Compounds 2 and 3 exhibited an IC50 of 274.6 and 109.5 μM, respectively, which are more potent than that of 1 (IC50 > 500 μM). In addition, a molecular docking simulation revealed the binding affinity of these compounds to tyrosinase and their mechanisms of inhibition. Thus, γ-irradiation is an effective method for structural modification of silybin. We also demonstrated that 2,3-dehydrosilybin is a potential tyrosinase inhibitor.

Keywords: silybin; isosilandrin; 2,3-dehydrosilybin; radiation; tyrosinase; molecular docking

1. Introduction

Silybum marianum, also known as milk thistle, is a member of the Asteraceae family and this extract has been used for centuries as a traditional folk medicine for liver protection in Europe and United States of America [1]. Silymarin, a mixture of flavonolignans extracted from the seeds of S. marianum, has demonstrated a broad spectrum of biological activities, including hepatoprotective [2], antidiabetic [3], anti-inflammatory [4], and antiviral effects [5]. The major component of silymarin is known to be silybin (synonym: silibinin; ca. 30%), which occurs naturally as a mixture of two diastereoisomers, silybin A and silybin B in approximately 1:1 ratio [6]. Other flavonolignans present in lesser amounts are isosilybin, sylimonin, and 2,3-dehydrosilybin [7]. These compounds have been isolated from the violet-flowered S. marianum, while the other flavonolignans, silandrin and isosilandrin, were found in the white-flowered S. marianum [8,9,10].

To introduce a new synthesis method for silybin derivatives, we irradiated silybin with gamma rays and confirmed the irradiation-induced formation of its derivatives. The modification of molecular structures using gamma-radiation is an economical, eco-friendly, and convenient method for obtaining derivatives with new or improved functionality [11]. Recently, there have been reports on the use of ionizing radiation for the production of new derivatives and the development of natural product compounds with improved bioactivity [11], such as genistein [12], chrysin [13], and 4-methylumbelliferone [14]. Related to the synthesis of individual flavonolignans in S. marianum, silybin was originally synthesized starting from taxifolin and coniferyl alcohol by horseradish-peroxidase and feeding suspension culture [15]. The total synthesis of isosilandrin has been previously reported [10], and 2,3-dehydrosilybin has been simply produced from silybin by an oxidation method [16,17,18,19]. However, the structural modification of silybin using ionizing irradiation has not been studied.

Melanin synthesis is usually initiated by ultraviolet (UV) light. However, excessive pigmentation caused by melanin overproduction leads to numerous skin problems including age spots and malignant melanoma [20]. The key enzyme involved in melanogenesis is tyrosinase [21]. This enzyme catalyzes two different processes involving the oxidation of tyrosine to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine and then to dopaquinone [22]. Therefore, research on the inhibition of tyrosinase for antipigmentation has been attracting increasing attention in pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries, and discoveries of new tyrosinase inhibitors have been focused on natural products [23]. Interestingly, there have been reports on silybin-inhibited monophenolase and diphenolase of tyrosinase [24], and silybin showed inhibitory effects on melanogenesis and proliferation in B16 melanoma 4A5 cells [25]. In addition, silybin induced melanogenesis through the protein kinase A and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways in B16-F1 melanoma cells [26].

This study aimed to apply ionizing radiation to silybin for molecular modification and to examine the bioactivity enhancement of the radiolytic products of silybin. Silybin derivatives were isolated and their tyrosinase inhibitory activities were evaluated. In addition, molecular docking simulation was employed to predict the binding affinity of the diastereomers of the given compounds in the active site of mushroom tyrosinase.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Structure Identification of Two Radiolysis Products Derived from Silybin

The sample solutions containing silybin (1; the mixture of silybin A and silybin B) were irradiated at different doses: 50, 100, 200, and 300 kGy. Their degradation patterns were then confirmed through HPLC-DAD analysis. Under this LC analysis condition, the peaks of silybin, which is a 1:1 mixture of silybin A and silybin B, appeared as two peaks, and peak 3, the radiolysis product, also appeared as two peaks as it converted into a mixture, whereas peak 2, though a mixture, did not split into two peaks but appeared as one broad peak. As the radiation dose increased, the peak area of silybin decreased while the peak area for the radiolysis products increased (Table 1 and Figure 1). At a radiation dose of 300 kGy, the two radiolysis products from silybin were produced with the highest yield, and their relative contents were higher than 16.7% of peak area of silybin, increasing to 33.5 and 49.8% of the peak area, respectively. The application of medium pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC) to this sample led to the isolation of two compounds 2 and 3. Their structures were identified by several NMR techniques, including 1H, 13C, DEPT, 1H-1H COSY, 1H-13C HSQC, 1H-13C HMBC nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and high-resolution electron ionization mass spectroscopy (HREIMS) data. Compound 2 was obtained as a colorless powder and exhibited a molecular ion at m/z 466.1265 [M]+ in HREIMS, corresponding to a molecular formula of C25H22O9. 1H and 13C spectra of 2 were similar to those of silybin (1), except for the presence of characteristic signals for flavanone at δH 2.76 (1H, m, Heq-3), 3.13 (1H, dd, J = 17.2, 12.7 Hz, Hax-3), and δC 42.6 (C-3), instead of signals for a hydroxymethyl group positioned at C-3 in 1. Thus, 2 was identified as isosilandrin, by comparing its spectroscopic data with literature values [10] (Figure 2). Compound 3 was obtained as a yellowish powder and gave a molecular ion peak at m/z 386.1368 [M]+ in HREIMS, corresponding to an elemental formula of C25H20O10. A comparison of the 1H and 13C spectral data of 3 with those of 1 indicated the absence of signals for two hydroxy methane groups and the presence of two quaternary carbon signals at δC 136.7 (C-3) and 146.1 (C-2) in 3. Based on a further detailed analysis of 2D NMR data and by comparison of its spectral data with literature values [18], 3 was identified as 2,3-dehydrosilybin (Figure 2).

Table 1.

The relative contents of peak 1–3 (% of peak area at 240 nm) 1.

Peaks Irradiated Dose
50 kGy 100 kGy 200 kGy 300 kGy
1 68.9 ± 5.8 56.2 ± 3.8 35.3 ± 4.3 16.7 ± 2.2
2 22.5 ± 2.1 28.4 ± 4.5 30.1 ± 2.7 33.5 ± 5.1
3 8.6 ± 1.8 15.5 ± 2.4 34.6 ± 1.5 49.8 ± 6.3

1 All samples were examined in a set of experiments repeated three times.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) HPLC profiles of silybin (1; the mixture of silybin A and silybin B) irradiated with the following doses: 50, 100, 200, and 300 kGy. The HPLC chromatogram was detected at 280 nm (UV). Peak 1: silybin (1); Peaks 2 and 3: radiolysis products of 1. (B) Kinetic analysis of the conversion of peak 1 to peaks 2 and 3.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The chemical structures of compounds 13.

The total synthesis of isosilandrin (2) has been reported with a yield of 2.64% (dry weight) of the starting material, ethyl ester (2E)-3[(2R,3R)-2,3-dihydro-3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,4-benzodioxin-6-yl-2-propenoic acid, by condensation of a derivative from the starting compound and 2-hydroxy-4,6-bis(methoxy)acetophenone [10]. Meanwhile, 2,3-dehydrosilybin has been simply produced from silybin by the oxidation method, including treatment with hydrogen peroxide in a solution of sodium bicarbonate [17], reaction with pyridine at reflux [18], and reaction with potassium acetate in dimethylformamide [19]. In this study, compounds 2 and 3 were purified to 335 mg and 412 mg, respectively, from a sample irradiated with the optimal dose of 300 kGy for 1 g of silybin, with yields of 33.5% and 41.2%, respectively. Therefore, the semi-synthesis of compound 2 using ionizing radiation proves much more efficient than its total synthesis (yield of 2.64%). Compound 3 was produced with a yield of 51% by the oxidation method [18]; meanwhile, a yield of 41.2% was obtained by using ionizing radiation, which is as simple as the oxidation method. Although silybin and other flavonolignans have been synthesized using chemical- or synthase-based methods, there has been no report on their structural modification by ionizing radiation.

2.2. Inhibition Effects of Mushroom Tyrosinase

Five sample solutions containing silybin irradiated with 0, 50, 100, 200, and 300 kGy were tested for enzymatic inhibitory activities against tyrosinase, comparing them to the positive control arbutin, which is a well-known tyrosinase inhibitor. The irradiated silybin samples exhibited tyrosinase inhibitory activity in a dose-dependent manner, and their IC50 values were significantly better than that of arbutin (Table 2). Among them, the 300 kGy irradiated sample with the highest radiolysis product content showed the highest potency on tyrosinase inhibition with an IC50 value of 171.1 μg/mL and showed a 13-fold stronger inhibitory activity than arbutin (IC50 = 2300 μg/mL) [27]. A further analysis of the tyrosinase activity showed that isosilandrin (2) and 2,3-dehydrosilybin (3) demonstrated significant inhibitory activity with IC50 values of 274.6 and 109.5 μM, respectively, compared to silybin (1) (Table 3). The difference in the structures of these three compounds is based on the oxidation or reduction of the C-ring in the phenylchromane skeleton of the flavonoid. It was assumed that 3 showed the greatest inhibitory activity due to the presence of an unsaturated conjugation system in the C-ring, which was structurally transformed to interact with the enzyme [28,29].

Table 2.

Mushroom tyrosinase inhibitory activity of non-irradiated (0 kGy) and irradiated samples (50–300 kGy).

Dose of Irradiated Samples 1 Concentration (μg/mL) Inhibition of
Tyrosinase (%)
IC50 (μg/mL) 2
0 50 5.2 ± 0.2 >200
100 11.4 ± 0.5
200 26.5 ± 0.8
50 50 16.1 ± 0.4 >200
100 23.6 ± 0.2
200 30.2 ± 1.0
100 50 16.0 ± 0.5 >200
100 20.9 ± 1.2
200 45.6 ± 1.8
200 50 17.1 ± 0.7 198.1
100 20.3 ± 0.2
200 52.2 ± 0.4
300 50 17.3 ± 0.1 171.1
100 30.8 ± 1.1
200 57.8 ± 1.5
Arbutin 3 2300 50.0 ± 2.1 2300

1 Sample solution (1 g silybin in 100 mL MeOH in 10% DMSO) divided into 100 vials were irradiated with 0–300 kGy (absorbed dose). 2 All samples were examined in a set of experiments repeated three times. 3 Arbutin was used as a positive control.

Table 3.

Mushroom tyrosinase inhibitory activities of compounds 13.

Compounds Tyrosinase (IC50, μM) 1
silybin (1) >500
isosilandrin (2) 274.6 ± 12.5
2,3-dehydrosilybin (3) 109.5 ± 8.7

1 All compounds were tested in a set of experiments repeated three times.

Silybin (1) has been reported to inhibit tyrosinase by mixed type I (KI < KIS) inhibition against both monophenolase and diphenolase [24]. Moreover, studies on silybin’s melanin induction and mechanism of action revealed that silybin stimulates melanogenesis through the activation of protein kinase A and p38 MAPK-dependent pathways, leading to cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein phosphorylation and microphthalmia-associated transcription factor expression [26]. Therefore, the enhanced tyrosinase inhibitory activities of radiolysis products 2 and 3 suggest that these compounds could be more therapeutically useful than silybin.

Among the few biological activities of isosilandrin (2) is the inhibition of the superoxide anion release by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes [10] and the production of nitric oxide through the suppression of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) transcriptional activation [30]. Meanwhile, 2,3-dehydrosilybin (3) has diverse biological activities. For instance, it exhibits greater antioxidant activity compared with silybin by protecting H2O2-induced HepG2 cell death and anticancer activity by inhibiting metalloproteinases-2 and -9, which are responsible for invasive metastasis [31]. Compound 3 also has multidrug resistance modulation activities: it inhibits the P-glycoprotein pump for the sensitization of doxorubicin-resistant ovarian carcinoma [32]; and it modulates the antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus and reduces its virulence [33]. In addition, compound 3 also modulates skin damage response. For instance, compound 3 modulated the pro-inflammatory cytokines production via the NF-κB and activator protein 1 signaling pathways [34]. Compound 3 also reduced inflammation and supported epidermis regeneration through downregulating the production of selected pro-inflammatory cytokines produced by normal human epidermal keratinocytes [35]. Moreover, it has suppressed UVA-caused oxidative stress of human keratinocytes HaCaT [36]. However, compounds 2 and 3 have been not reported to have any inhibitory activity with respect to tyrosinase, an enzyme important for melanin synthesis through melanogenesis.

2.3. Molecular Docking Analysis of Silybin Derivatives

Based on the suggested tyrosinase inhibition and melanin induction mechanism of silybin, we examined possible binding interactions between the selected structures of silybin derivatives and mushroom tyrosinase. For docking, we used the X-ray crystal structure (PDB ID: 2Y9X) of mushroom tyrosinase (Agaricus bisporus) complexed with tropolone. The structure was obtained from the RCSB Protein Data Bank (PDB) [37]. The A chain of this protein has five binding active sites (AC1, AC2, AC3, AC4, and AC7). AC1 consists of His61, Cys83, His85, and His94; AC2 consists of His259, His263, and His296; AC3 consists of Asn260, His263, Phe264, Met280, Val283, Ala286, and Cu401; AC4 consists of Asp336, Gln351, and Asp353; and AC7 consists of Asp312. The molecular docking experiments of the selected stereostructures of 13, (+)-silybin A, (−)-silybin B, (−)-isosilandrin A, (+)-isosilandrin B, (−)-dehydrosilybin, and (+)-dehydrosilybin B, within the active binding site of tyrosinase were conducted using the Discovery Studio software ver. 21.0.1.20298 (BIOVIA/Accelrys Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The docking score and interaction results are listed in Table 4. Six compounds showed stable binding energy levels with tyrosinase with –CDOCKER energies larger than that of arbutin (5.0142 kcal/mol). Arbutin was located partially in AC2 and AC3, with the interactions of His259, His263, Asn260, Cu401, His244, and Val248 (Figure 3). This finding was similar to the molecular docking result of arbutin in a previous report [38,39]. The values of –CDOCKER energy of (+)-silybin A and (−)-silybin B were greater than that of arbutin and similar to each other (Table 4). The chromanone core in their structures interacted closely with the key residues of site AC3, namely Met280, Ala286, His263, Val283, Asn260, and Cu401 (Figure 3). Phe264 and Gly281 formed an interaction with the methoxy group substituted on the phenylpropane moiety. Moreover, (−)-Isosilandrin A and (+)-isosilandrin B had slightly higher –CDOCKER energy values to (+)-silybin A and (−)-silybin B. While these two also showed similarity in that they were partially located in AC3 and interacting with the residues Met280, Ala286, His263, and Val283, there were differences showing the interaction of His85 and the carbonyl group in flavanone at site AC1, Phe 264, Val 248, and the C-ring in flavanone (Table 1 and Figure 3). Furthermore, (−)-dehydrosilybin, and (+)-dehydrosilybin B, which have flavonol structures, docked into the AC2 and AC3 pockets with the highest values of –CDOCKER energy compared to the five previously docked compounds. The difference in the docking poses explained the difference in interactions compared with the findings for silybin and isosilandrin. The phenylpropane moiety interacted with the residues of sites AC1 and AC3, namely His259, Met280, His263, and Val283. The 3-hydroxy group located on flavonol formed interactions with Arg268 and Phe264. In a comparison of the docking simulation data with the results of the experimental in vitro assay for mushroom tyrosinase inhibition, a good correlation was found between the docking scores and IC50 values of docked compounds. The explanation for this could be that the structurally different poses of (−)-dehydrosilybin and (+)-dehydrosilybin B in the active sites resulted in the higher inhibitory activity of those compounds against tyrosinase. In addition, the inhibition constant (Ki) was calculated from the binding energy (ΔG) using the following formula: Ki = exp(ΔG/RT) [R: universal gas constant (1.985 × 10−3 kcal mol−1 K−1); T: temperature (298.15 K)] [40]. In the case of arbutin, the Ki value was 209.2 μM, but the Ki values of the remaining compounds were too low (fM or less) to be presented in Table 4. In a report on the theoretical analysis of the relationship between the Ki of a compound and the IC50 value, which represents the inhibitor concentration required to inhibit the enzyme reaction by 50% at a specific substrate concentration [41], the authors explain that Ki is not equal to IC50 when competitive inhibition kinetics are applied, but Ki is equal to IC50 under noncompetitive or uncompetitive kinetic conditions. It suggests that the silybin derivatives that were treated as structurally similar compounds to the substrate showed a behavior with competitive inhibition, competing for binding to the active site of the enzyme or preventing the substrate from binding to the active center of the enzyme.

Table 4.

Docking score and interactions of the selected structures of 13 against tyrosinase.

Compound Name Structure -CDOCKER Energy (kcal/mol) Interacting Residues
Arbutin 1 graphic file with name molecules-29-05332-i001.jpg 5.0142 His259, His263, Asn260, His244, Val248, Cu401
(+)-silybin A graphic file with name molecules-29-05332-i002.jpg 19.1086 Met280, Ala286, His263, Val283, Pro284, Phe264, Gly281, Ser282, Asn260, Gly281, Cu401
(−)-silybin B graphic file with name molecules-29-05332-i003.jpg 21.5132 Met280, Ala286, His263, Val283, Arg268, Phe264, Gly281, Asn260, Val248, His244, Cu401
(−)-isosilandrin A graphic file with name molecules-29-05332-i004.jpg 23.3343 Met280, Ala286, His263, Val283, Ser282, His85, Val248, Phe264, Leu275
(+)-isosilandrin B graphic file with name molecules-29-05332-i005.jpg 22.0735 Met280, Ala286, His263, Val283, Ser282, His85, Val248, Phe264
(−)-dehydrosilybin graphic file with name molecules-29-05332-i006.jpg 36.4082 Val283, His259, Met280, His263, Phe264, Arg268, Gly281
(+)-dehydrosilybin B graphic file with name molecules-29-05332-i007.jpg 34.7141 Val283, His259, Met280, His263, Phe264, Arg268, His244, Val248

1 Arbutin was used as a positive control.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Figure 3

(A) A chain of mushroom tyrosinase and favorable pose of arbutin (the positive control) in binding site. Two-dimensional receptor–ligand interacting modes of (B) arbutin, (C) (+)-silybin A, (D) (−)-silybin B, (E) (−)-isosilandrin A, (F) (+)-isosilandrin B, (G) (−)-dehydrosilybin, and (H) (+)-dehydrosilybin B in the active site of mushroom tyrosinase.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Methods

NMR spectra were performed using a Bruker AM500 instrument (1H NMR at 500 MHz, 13C NMR at 125 MHz, Billerica, MA, USA) and JEOL ECX-500 instrument (1H NMR at 500 MHz, 13C NMR at 125 MHz, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). EI-HR-MS (JEOL JMS-700, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used to collect spectroscopic data. An analytical HPLC-DAD-MSD process was carried out on an Agilent 1100 series system (Agilent Technologies Co., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and an Agilent mass spectrometer detector equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source (Agilent Technologies Co., Santa Clara, CA, USA), equipped with a TSK-GEL ODF-100 V column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm; TOSOH, Tokyo, Japan). Separations were conducted using RediSep Rf Normal Phase Silica columns on MPLC instrument (Teledyne ISCO CombiFlash®, Lincoln, NE, USA). Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on precoated TLC plates using Kieselgel 60 F254 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). These were visualized at 254 nm using a UV lamp (UVP, Cambridge, UK), and 10% sulfuric acid spray was applied followed by heating. DMSO-d6 and acetone-d6 were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Lab. Inc., (Tewksbury, MA, USA).

3.2. Sample Preparation

Irradiation was carried out at ambient temperature, using a [60Co] γ-irradiator (150 TBq capacity; AECL, Ottawa, ON, Canada) in the Advanced Radiation Technology Institute, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (Jeongup-si, Korea). The source intensity was approximately 320 kCi, and the dose rate at the location of the sample was 10 kGy/h. Dosimetry was performed using alanine dosimeters (Bruker Instruments, Rheinstetten, Germany) with a diameter of 5 mm, which were calibrated according to the International Standard set by the International Atomic Energy Agency (Vienna, Austria). Silybin (the racemic mixture) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Sample solutions (1 g silybin in 100 mL methanol in 10% DMSO) was divided into 100 vials, which were then irradiated with 300 kGy (absorbed dose). After γ-irradiation, the sample solution was immediately evaporated to remove the solvent and freeze-dried for further analysis.

3.3. HPLC DAD-MSD

An analysis of the γ-irradiated sample solutions (1 g silybin in 100 mL methanol in 10% DMSO) was performed by HPLC-DAD-MSD analysis with a TSK-GEL ODF-100 V column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm; TOSOH). Gradient elution was carried out with 0.5% formic acid in water (A) and acetonitrile (B). The gradient elution program was as follows: 0.5 min, 0% B; 15 min, 65% B; 35 min, 75% B; 65 min, 85% B; and 85 min, 100% B, and then held for 15 min before returning to the initial conditions. Samples (5 μL) were injected at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Chromatograms were acquired at 280 nm. ESI was performed in positive ion mode with the following parameters: capillary potential, 4000 V; drying gas temperature, 350 °C; gas flow (N2), 12 L/min; and nebulizer pressure, 35 psig. Data were acquired for a mass scan range of m/z 100 to 1000.

3.4. Isolation of Silybin Derivatives

The γ-irradiated silybin (1 g) was subjected to MPLC with a reversed-phase silica gel cartridge column. The mobile phase was composed of water (A) and methanol (B). The gradient conditions were as follows: 30 min, 40% B; 70 min, 50% B; 90 min, 100% B. The total flow rate was maintained at 20 mL/min, and chromatograms were acquired at 280 nm. Radiolysis products 2 (335 mg, 33.5% yield) and 3 (412 mg, 41.2% yield) were purified.

  • Isosilandrin (2). Colorless powder. 1H NMR (500 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 2.76 (1H, m, Heq-3), 3.13 (1H, dd, J = 17.2, 12.7 Hz, Hax-3), 3.54 (1H, m, H-23), 3.72 (1H, m, H-23), 3.84 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.11 (1H, dd, J = 7.9, 3.7 Hz, H-10), 4.96 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz, H-11), 5.41 (1H, dd, J = 12.7, 3.2 Hz, H-2), 5.93 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-6), 5.95 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-8), 6.86–7.10 (6H, m, H-21, 22, 18, 16, 13, 15), 7.94 (s, 20-OH), 12.13 (s, 5-OH); 13C NMR (125 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 42.6 (C-3), 55.6 (18-OCH3), 61.1 (C-11), 76.4 (C-13), 78.3 (C-12), 78.8 (C-2), 95.1 (C-6), 96.1 (C-8), 102.5 (C-10), 111.1 (C-15), 115.0 (C-19), 116.9 (C-6′), 116.9 (C-5′), 119.7 (C-16), 120.8 (C-1′, 2′), 128.3 (C-14), 132.8 (C-2), 144.1 (C-3′, 4′), 147.2 (C-17), 147.7 (C-18), 163.4 (C-9), 164.4 (C-5), 166.5 (C-7), 196.2 (C-4); EIMS m/z 466 [M]+; HREIMS m/z 466.1265, (calcd for C25H22O9, 466.1264).

  • 2,3-Dehydrosilybin (3). Yellowish powder. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 3.38 (1H, br d, J = 12.3 Hz, H-23), 3.58 (1H, br d, J = 12.3 Hz, H-23), 3.80 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.28 (1H, ddd, J = 7.8, 4.7, 1.5 Hz, H-10), 4.97 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, H-11), 6.20 (1H, d, J = 1.9 Hz, H-6), 6.46 (1H, d, J = 1.9 Hz, H-8), 6.83 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-21), 6.90 (1H, dd, J = 8.0, 1.1 Hz, H-22), 7.05 (1H, d, J = 1.1 Hz, H-18), 7.12 (1H, d, J = 8.7 Hz, H-16), 7.75 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-13), 7.77 (1H, dd, J = 8.7, 2.0 Hz, H-15), 12.41 (s, 5-OH); 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 56.1 (OCH3), 60.5 (C-23), 76.3 (C-11), 78.9 (C-10), 94.0 (C-8), 98.7 (C-6), 103.5 (C-4a), 112.2 (C-18), 115.7 (C-21), 116.6 (C-13), 117.2 (C-16), 121.0 (C-22), 121.6 (C-15), 124.1 (C-14), 127.6 (C-17), 136.7 (C-3), 143.8 (C-12a), 145.4 (C-16a), 146.1 (C-2), 147.5 (C-20), 148.1 (C-19), 156.6 (C-9), 161.1 (C-5), 164.5 (C-7), 176.4 (C-4); EIMS m/z 480 [M]+; HREIMS m/z 480.1057, (calcd for C25H20O10, 480.1056).

3.5. Tyrosinase Inhibitory Activity

Mushroom tyrosinase (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) was used for in vitro assays with slight modifications from a previously described method [42]. In this experiment, potassium phosphate buffer (0.07 mL, 50 mM) at pH 6.5, 0.03 mL tyrosinase (333 units/ mL), and 2 μL of the non-irradiated and irradiated samples (0–200 μg/mL) and the tested compounds (0–500 μM), were dissolved in absolute ethanol and inserted into 96-well plates. After 5 min incubation at room temperature, 0.1 mL L-tyrosine (2 mM) was added and incubated for additional 20 min. The optical density of the samples was measured at 475 nm (SpectraMax M2 Multi-Mode Microplate Reader, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and showed a linear color change with time during the 20 min of the experiment compared to the control containing methanol (2 μL) and without inhibitor. Arbutin (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), the known tyrosinase inhibitor, was used in the assays for comparison.

3.6. Molecular Docking Analyses

The X-ray crystal structure of mushroom tyrosinase (Agaricus bisporus) complexed with tropolone (PDB ID: 2Y9X) was obtained from the RCSB PDB (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb, accessed on 1 October 2024) was prepared using the protein preparation of the Discovery Studio software ver. 21.0.1.20298 (BIOVIA/Accelrys Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The A chain of this protein was prepared for docking, the water molecules and tropolone were removed, and the hydrogens were added. The 2D structures of ligands were obtained from CAS SciFinder (American Chemical Society, Columbus, OH, USA) and then prepared in their energy minimized structures using the MM2 calculation of ChemOffice software (Chem3D Ultra 7.0, CambridgeSoft, Cambridge, MA, USA). The 3D structures for docking were prepared using the default values that exclude the production of isomer and tautomer in the ligand preparation tool of the Discovery Studio software. Protein–ligand simulations were performed using CDOCKER docking protocol in Discovery Studio software (BIOVIA/Accelrys Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), which is a molecular dynamics code based on the Chemistry at Harvard Macromolecular Mechanics (CHARMm) algorithm [43]. The grid box was generated by controlling the grid size such that it was sufficient to accommodate the selected compounds from the prepositioned tropolone as centroid. The active sites were constituted by residues His61, Cys83, His85, His94, His259, His263, His296, Asn260, His263, Phe264, Met280, Val283, Ala286, Cu401, Asp336, Gln351, Asp353, and Asp312. The best poses of each compound were selected based on –CDOCKER energy, a score including internal ligand strain energy and receptor–ligand interaction energy, as well as the interactions of critical residues within the docked position.

3.7. Statistical Analysis

The samples were evaluated in triplicate. The results were subject to variance analysis using SigmaPlotTM 10.0.1 (Systat Software GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany). Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.

4. Conclusions

We established a novel method for the formation of isosilandrin (2) and 2,3-dehydrosilybin (3) through γ-irradiation on silybin. The optimal γ-ray dose for obtaining both radiolysis products in high yield is 300 kGy. In the evaluation of their tyrosinase inhibitory activity, compounds 2 and 3 showed approximately 1.8 and 4.5 times more inhibition than the non-irradiated silybin. A molecular docking analysis of the selected stereostructures of compounds 13 revealed stable binding energy levels. Among them, the stereostructures for compound 3 fit within the active sites of mushroom tyrosinase in the lowest energy conformations characterized by the phenylpropane and flavonol structures having optimal attractive electrostatic interactions with the catalytic triad residues of tyrosinase. Therefore, the bioactivity of silybin could be significantly enhanced through structural modifications using ionizing radiation technology, and compound 3 could be identified as a potent tyrosinase inhibitor given its ability to bind directly to the active sites of tyrosinase.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.W.R. and C.H.J.; methodology, H.W.R. and C.H.J.; software, A.-R.H.; validation, A.-R.H.; investigation, H.W.R.; resources, C.H.J.; data curation, A.-R.H.; writing—original draft preparation, H.W.R. and A.-R.H.; writing—review and editing, A.-R.H. and C.H.J. visualization, A.-R.H.; supervision, C.H.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the research program of Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, project number 523320-24.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Morishima C., Shuhart M.C., Wang C.C., Paschal D.M., Apodaca M.C., Liu Y., Sloan D.D., Graf T.N., Oberlies N.H., Lee D.Y.-W., et al. Silymarin Inhibits In Vitro T-Cell Proliferation and Cytokine Production in Hepatitis C Virus Infection. J. Gastroenterol. 2010;138:671–681. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Muriel P., Garciapina T., Perez-Alvarez V., Mourelle M. Silymarin protects against paracetamol-induced lipid peroxidation and liver damage. J. Appl. Toxicol. 1992;12:439–442. doi: 10.1002/jat.2550120613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ferdowsi S., Shidfar F., Heidari I., Kashi M., Sohouli M.H., Sarrafi Zadeh S. Effect of silymarin on lipid profile and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Phytother. Res. 2024;38:4667–4674. doi: 10.1002/ptr.8273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Surai P.F., Surai A., Earle-Payne K. Silymarin and Inflammation: Food for Thoughts. Antioxidants. 2024;13:98. doi: 10.3390/antiox13010098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Polyak S.J., Ferenci P., Pawlotsky J.M. Hepatoprotective and antiviral functions of silymarin components in hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology. 2013;57:1262–1271. doi: 10.1002/hep.26179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pelter A., Hänsel R. The structure of silybin (silybum substance E6), the first flavonolignan. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968;9:2911–2916. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)89610-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fenclova M., Stranska-Zachariasova M., Benes F., Novakova A., Jonatova P., Kren V., Vitek L., Hajslova J. Liquid chromatography-drift tube ion mobility-mass spectrometry as a new challenging tool for the separation and characterization of silymarin flavonolignans. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020;412:819–832. doi: 10.1007/s00216-019-02274-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Szilági I., Tétényi P., Antus S., Seligmann O., Chari V.M., Seitz M., Wagner H. Struktur von Silandrin und Silymonin, zwei neuen Flavanolignanen aus einer weißblühenden Silybum marianum Varietät [Structure of silandrin and silymonin, two new flavanolignans from a white blooming Silybum marianum variety] Planta Med. 1981;43:121–127. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-971488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nyiredy S., Samu Z., Szücs Z., Gulácsi K., Kurtán T., Antus S. New insight into the biosynthesis of flavanolignans in the white-flowered variant of Silybum marianum. J. Chromatogr Sci. 2008;46:93–96. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/46.2.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Samu Z., Nyiredy S., Baitz-Gács E., Varga Z., Kurtán T., Dinya Z., Antus S. Structure elucidation and antioxidant activity of (-)-isosilandrin isolated from Silybum marianum L. Chem. Biodivers. 2004;1:1668–1677. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200490125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Song H.Y., Kim K.I., Han J.M., Park W.Y., Seom H.S., Lim S., Byun E.-B. Ionizing radiation technology to improve the physicochemical and biological properties of natural compounds by molecular modification: A review. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2022;194:110013. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim K.I., Song H.Y., Han J.M., Lim S., Seo H.S., Byun E.B. Gamma Irradiation on genistein: Enhancement of antioxidant property through structural transformation. Radiat Phys. Chem. 2022;193:109962. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.109962. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Song H.Y., Kim W.S., Mushtaq S., Park J.M., Choi S.H., Cho J.W., Lim S.T., Byun E.B. A novel chrysin derivative produced by gamma irradiation attenuates 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene-induced atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions in Balb/c mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019;128:223–232. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.03.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jeong G.H., Yadav M., Lee S.S., Chung B.Y., Cho J.-H., Lee I.-C., Bai H.-W., Kim T.H. Novel dihydrocoumarins induced by radiolysis as potent tyrosinase inhibitors. Molecules. 2024;29:341. doi: 10.3390/molecules29020341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schrall R., Becker H. Benzodioxans by oxidative phenol coupling. Synthesis of silybin. Planta Med. 1977;32:27–32. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1097554. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Maitrejean M., Comte G., Barron D., El Kirat K., Conseil G., Di Pietro A. The flavanolignan silybin and its hemisynthetic derivatives, a novel series of potential modulators of P-glycoprotein. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000;10:157–160. doi: 10.1016/S0960-894X(99)00636-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Halbach G., Trost W. Chemistry and pharmacology of silymarin (3 methyltaxifolin). Study of some transformation products of silybin (3 methyltaxifolin) Drug Res. 1974;24:866–868. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gažák R., Svobodová A., Psotová J., Sedmera P., Přikrylová V., Walterová D., Křen V. Oxidised derivatives of silybin and their antiradical and antioxidant activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004;12:5677–5687. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2004.07.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zarrelli A., Sgambato A., Petito V., De Napoli L., Previtera L., Di Fabio G. New C-23 modified of silybin and 2,3-dehydrosilybin: Synthesis and preliminary evaluation of antioxidant properties. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011;21:4389. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.06.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Solano F. Photoprotection and skin pigmentation: Melanin-related molecules and some other new agents obtained from natural sources. Molecules. 2020;25:1537. doi: 10.3390/molecules25071537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Iwata M., Corn T., Iwata S., Everett M.A., Fuller B.B. The relationship between tyrosinase activity and skin color in human foreskins. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1990;95:9–15. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12872677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cooksey C.J., Garratt P.J., Land E.J., Pave S., Ramsden C.A., Riley P.A., Smit N.P.M. Evidence of the indirect formation of the catecholic intermediate substrate responsible for the autoactivation kinetics of tyrosinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:26226–26235. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.42.26226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zolghadri S., Bahrami A., Hassan Khan M.T., Munoz-Munoz J., Garcia-Molina F., Garcia-Canovas F., Saboury A.A. A comprehensive review on tyrosinase inhibitors. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2019;34:279–309. doi: 10.1080/14756366.2018.1545767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kim J.Y., Kim J.Y., Jenis J., Li Z.P., Ban Y.J., Baiseitova A., Park K.H. Tyrosinase inhibitory study of flavonolignans from the seeds of Silybum marianum (Milk thistle) Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2019;27:2499–2507. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2019.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nakashima S., Matsuda H., Oda Y., Nakamura S., Xu F., Yoshikawa M. Melanogenesis inhibitors from the desert plant Anastatica hierochuntica in B16 melanoma cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010;18:2337–2345. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.01.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Uto T., Ohta T., Katayama K., Shoyama Y. Silibinin promotes melanogenesis through the PKA and p38 MAPK signaling pathways in melanoma cells. Biomed. Res. 2022;43:31–39. doi: 10.2220/biomedres.43.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rho H.S., Ahn S.M., Lee B.C., Kim M.K., Ghimeray A.K., Jin C.W., Cho D.H. Changes in flavonoid content and tyrosinase inhibitory activity in kenaf leaf extract after far-infrared treatment. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010;20:7534–7536. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.09.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kim Y.J., Uyama H. Tyrosinase inhibitors from natural and synthetic sources: Structure, inhibition mechanism and perspective for the future. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005;62:1707–1723. doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-5054-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kubo I., Kinst-Hori I. Flavonols from saffron flower: Tyrosinase inhibitory activity and inhibition mechanism. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999;47:4121–4125. doi: 10.1021/jf990201q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cho B.O., So Y., Jin C.H., Nam B.M., Yee S.T., Jeong I.Y. 3-Deoxysilybin exerts anti-inflammatory effects by suppressing NF-κB activation in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW264. 7 macrophages. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2014;78:2051–2058. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2014.948377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Huber A., Thongphasuk P., Erben G., Lehmann W.D., Tuma S., Stremmel W., Chamulitrat W. Significantly greater antioxidant anticancer activities of 2, 3-dehydrosilybin than silybin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2008;1780:837–847. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2007.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dobiasová S., Řehořová K., Kučerová D., Biedermann D., Káňová K., Petrásková L., Koucká K., Václavíková R., Valentová K., Ruml T., et al. Multidrug resistance modulation activity of silybin derivatives and their anti-inflammatory potential. Antioxidants. 2020;9:455. doi: 10.3390/antiox9050455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Holasová K., Křížkovská B., Hoang L., Dobiasova S., Lipov J., Macek T., Křen V., Valentová K., Ruml T., Viktorová J. Flavonolignans from silymarin modulate antibiotic resistance and virulence in Staphylococcus aureus. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022;149:112806. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Juráňová J., Aury-Landas J., Boumediene K., Baugé C., Biedermann D., Ulrichová J., Franková J. Modulation of skin inflammatory response by active components of silymarin. Molecules. 2018;24:123. doi: 10.3390/molecules24010123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Frankova J., Juranova J., Biedermann D., Ulrichova J. Influence of silymarin components on keratinocytes and 3D reconstructed epidermis. Toxicol. Vitr. 2021;74:105162. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2021.105162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Svobodova A., Zdarilova A., Walterova D., Vostalova J. Flavonolignans from Silybum marianum moderate UVA-induced oxidative damage to HaCaT keratinocytes. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2007;48:213–224. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2007.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ismaya W.T., Rozeboom H.J., Weijn A., Mes J.J., Fusetti F., Wichers H.J., Dijkstra B.W. Crystal structure of Agaricus bisporus mushroom tyrosinase: Identity of the tetramer subunits and interaction with tropolone. Biochemistry. 2011;50:5477–5486. doi: 10.1021/bi200395t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tan H., He X., Han L., Ren H., Chai J., Li M., Zhao W., Lee J., Liu S., Li X., et al. Melanin resistance of heat-processed ginsenosides from Panax ginseng berry treated with citric acid through autophagy pathway. Bioorganic Chem. 2024;152:107758. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2024.107758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lv Y., Yao C., Han K., Xie D., Xie S., Xu J., Zhao P., Yang X. Investigation of the inhibitory activity of β-arbutin and its analogues on tyrosinase based on molecular docking and enzyme inhibition kinetics. Chem. Biodivers. 2024:e202402040. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.202402040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Christopher L.D.O., Gladys C.C., Ruel C.N., Ricky B.N. Potential inhibitors of galactofuranosyltransferase 2 (GlfT2): Molecular Docking, 3D-QSAR, and In silico ADMETox studies. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:17096. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52764-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cheng Y.-C., Prusoff W.H. Relationship between the inhibition constant (KI) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1973;22:3099–3108. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(73)90196-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kubo I., Kinst-Hori I. Tyrosinase inhibitors from cumin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998;46:5338–5341. doi: 10.1021/jf980226+. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wu G., Robertson D.H., Brooks III C.L., Vieth M. Detailed analysis of grid-based molecular docking: A case study of CDOCKER—A CHARMm-based MD docking algorithm. J. Comput. Chem. 2003;24:1549–1562. doi: 10.1002/jcc.10306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.


Articles from Molecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES