Error in Figure
In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figures 7 and 8 as published. “R300 P.V./TNF alpha” at Figure 6 was mistakenly used again for “F300 P.V./IL-6” at Figure 7; “F100 P.P./TNF alpha” at Figure 6 was mistakenly used again for “F100 P.V./caspase-3” at Figure 8; “FIR300 P.V./IL6” at Figure 7 was mistakenly used gain for “F300 P.V./caspase-3” at Figure 8. The corrected Figure 7 and Figure 8 appear below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Reference
- 1.Selim N.M., El-Hawary S.S., El Zalabani S.M., Shamma R.N., Mahdy N.E.S., Sherif N.H., Fahmy H.A., Mekkawy M.H., Yasri A., Sobeh M. Impact of Washingtonia robusta Leaves on Gamma Irradiation-Induced Hepatotoxicity in Rats and Correlation with STING Pathway and Phenolic Composition. Pharmaceuticals. 2020;13:320. doi: 10.3390/ph13100320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]