Abstract
The reactive molecular dynamics method was employed to examine the thermal decomposition process of aluminized hydride (AlH3) containing explosive nanoparticles with a core–shell structure under high temperature. The core was composed of the explosives RDX, HMX, and CL-20, while the shell was composed of AlH3. It was demonstrated that the CL-20@AlH3 NPs decomposed at a faster rate than the other NPs, and elevated temperatures could accelerate the initial decomposition of the explosive molecules. The incorporation of aluminized hydride shells did not change the initial decomposition mechanism of the three explosives. The yields of the main products (NO, NO2, N2, H2O, H2, and CO2) were investigated. There was a large number of solid aluminized clusters produced during the decomposition, mainly AlmOn and AlmCn clusters, together with AlmNn clusters dispersed in the AlmOn clusters.
Keywords: reactive molecular dynamics, core–shell-structured aluminized hydride explosive, morphology evolution, decomposition kinetics, aluminized clusters
1. Introduction
Energetic materials are a class of materials that possess high energy densities and specialized chemical properties, with applications in the fields of military, civilian demolition, aerospace, and industrial manufacturing [1,2]. Among them, 1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazinane (RDX), octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX), and hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane (CL-20) are commonly used high explosives. RDX is widely used in artillery shells, landmines, and other military munitions due to its high energy density and stability [3,4]. HMX has an even higher energy density than RDX and is commonly used for military applications requiring large amounts of energy, such as nuclear weapon fuses and missile systems [4,5]. CL-20 belongs to a new generation of high explosives with an exceptionally high energy density [6], which makes it one of the most powerful explosives known today. It can be utilized in sophisticated weaponry, including hypersonic weapons and missiles [7].
Hydrogen energy offers a significant opportunity for the development of a clean energy source, offering a promising pathway towards a green and low-carbon transition. Aluminum hydride (AlH3) is identified as one of the most promising materials for hydrogen storage [8,9,10,11]. In the aerospace industry, AlH3 exhibits a number of advantageous properties, including high hydrogen content, high heat of combustion, low molecular weight of the combustion products, and relatively high thermal decomposition temperature. Additionally, it is an environmentally friendly material. Partially replacing aluminum powder with AlH3 has been demonstrated to markedly enhance the energy density of solid propellants, rendering them an optimal high-energy fuel. Thermochemical calculations demonstrated that AlH3 generates lower flame temperatures and higher specific impulses in comparison to aluminum fuels [12]. DeLuca et al. [13] conducted an experiment to assess the chemical and physical properties of AlH3-based composite solid propellants in addition to their ballistic characteristics. A comparison of the flame structures of AlH3 and aluminum-plated propellants revealed that the performance of the AlH3-based propellants was superior to that of the Al-based propellants. The ignition and combustion behaviors of aluminum hydride (α-AlH3) investigated by Yong et al. [14] demonstrated that both the ignition temperature and the temperature at which hydrogen is released increase with the increase in the heating rate. In addition, as the oxygen concentration increases, the combustion time and intensity decrease. Bazyn et al. [15] conducted a comparative analysis of the high-pressure combustion characteristics of aluminum hydride and aluminum in carbon dioxide and oxygen. The findings demonstrate that hydrogen is desorbed at a temperature significantly below the ignition temperature threshold of aluminum, and the released hydrogen is subsequently oxidized alongside the decomposition products of the oxidant. Additionally, the temperatures of the gas-phase and solid-state products were found to be highly comparable for both components. These investigations suggest that aluminum hydride possesses considerable potential for enhancing the explosive properties of energetic materials.
The molecular dynamics (MD) method is an effective approach for simulating the decomposition processes of energetic materials at the atomic level due to their complex chemical behaviors and extremely high risk. The reactive MD (RMD) method extends the time scale of the simulation and the size of the simulated system, making it a promising theoretical approach for exploring the pyrolysis and combustion reactions of energetic materials. Recently, the RMD has been successfully employed to simulate the thermal decomposition reactions of explosives and fuels [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Mei et al. [24] conducted molecular dynamics simulations of the thermal decomposition processes of nano-AlH3/TNT and nano-AlH3/CL-20 composites, and the findings indicate that nano-AlH3 particles facilitate the decomposition of explosives molecules. The findings by Ji et al. [25] indicate that the decomposition of HMX molecules in the Al/HMX composite is accelerated by the addition of Al. Subsequently, Ji et al. [26] conducted RMD simulations of the combustion process of aluminum-containing explosives in an oxygen environment. The results indicate that oxygen is seldom directly involved in the initial decomposition of explosive molecules, but instead primarily reacts with intermediates and free radicals. Additionally, the combustion process was observed to produce a significant number of solid aluminized clusters. The aforementioned studies demonstrate that the RMD can successfully simulate the thermal decomposition of aluminum- or aluminum hydride-containing explosives with a large size.
In this work, nanoparticles (NPs) of the explosives RDX, HMX, and CL-20 were used as cores to be assembled with shells of AlH3 to build three core–shell-structured composites named RDX@AlH3 NP, HMX@AlH3 NP, and CL-20@AlH3 NP, respectively. Then, their thermal decomposition processes at different temperatures were investigated using the RMD method. Our main objective was to study the impact of temperature on the thermal decomposition of RDX@AlH3, HMX@AlH3, and CL-20@AlH3 NPs and to examine the differences in their decomposition mechanisms.
2. Computational Methods
All RMD simulations were performed utilizing the ReaxFF reactive force field, implemented within the LAMMPS software package (Version: 5 Jun 2019) [27]. The reactive force field uses bond-order formalism and polarizable charges to accurately describe reactive and non-reactive interactions. ReaxFF has been employed extensively for the high-temperature pyrolysis of energetic materials. The ReaxFF parameters developed by Mai et al. [24] have been successfully utilized to simulate the pyrolysis and combustion of aluminized and hydrogenated aluminum explosives. The unit cell structures of RDX, HMX, and CL-20 were derived from experimental data [28,29,30]. We firstly constructed aluminum shells with a diameter of 6 nm and a thickness of 0.1 nm. Then, nanoparticles of RDX with a diameter of 5 nm were cut from the unit cell of RDX. Subsequently, the aluminum shells and the nanoparticles were assembled together, as illustrated in Figure 1. Finally, the initial RDX@AlH3 NPs were put at the center of the simulation box. It was demonstrated that the impact of periodicity on the simulation outcomes can be eliminated by setting the side length of the simulation box to be approximately twice the diameter of the nanoparticles [31]. Consequently, the side length of the box was set to 8 nm in the present simulations. The number of molecules and atoms included in the constructed models is listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Model | Atoms | Explosive Molecules | No. of AlH3 | Mass Ratio of AlH3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
RDX@AlH3 NP | 9545 | 332 | 668 | 21.4% |
HMX@AlH3 NP | 9772 | 257 | 668 | 20.9% |
CL-20@AlH3 NP | 9488 | 192 | 668 | 19.2% |
As an illustrative example, the RDX@AlH3 NPs were subjected to a 10 ps relaxation process utilizing the isothermal–isobaric ensemble (NPT) (T = 298 K, P = 1 atm) until the internal stress reached zero, ultimately yielding a stable structure. The relaxation process was conducted using an Andersen thermostat and a Nosé–Hoover thermostat to regulate the system pressure and temperature, respectively. The relaxed structure obtained was then employed as an input model for the subsequent simulations. The canonical ensemble (NVT) was used to simulate the decomposition of the RDX@AlH3 model, with the system temperature regulated by the Nosé–Hoover thermostat. Four temperatures were selected for the simulated systems: 2100, 2400, 2700, and 3000 K. The total duration of the simulation was set to 300 ps with a time step of 0.1 fs, and the damping constant was set to 100 fs. The construction and simulation processes of HMX@AlH3 and CL-20@AlH3 NPs were similar to those of RDX@AlH3 NPs.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Morphological Evolution
In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of the thermal decomposition process of the three AlH3-containing explosive NPs, their morphological evolution was examined. AlH3 is susceptible to decompose to produce metallic aluminum and hydrogen gas when subjected to an increasing temperature, resulting in a decrease in its thermal stability. Nevertheless, nanocrystalline AlH3 displays greater thermal sensitivity [32]. Figure 2 depicts the decomposition process of RDX@AlH3 NPs at 2400 K. As illustrated in Figure 2, the release of hydrogen gas commenced at 0.1 ps. Song et al. [12] reported that the hydrogen bubbles in the shell have a high kinetic energy and are able to break through the thin layer. As the temperature rises, the thrust of the hydrogen bubbles increases, resulting in the ejection of a great number of aluminum clusters from the nanoparticles. This finding is in accordance with the results observed in our simulation. During the initial reaction stage from 0 to 2 ps, the RDX@AlH3 NPs gradually expanded, accompanied by the production of a considerable quantity of hydrogen gas and free radicals within the system. As the reaction time increased from 2 to 15 ps, the decomposition rate of RDX accelerated. The thrust generated by the substantial quantity of gas produced in the RDX@AlH3 NPs then facilitated the splitting of the aluminum shell, thereby promoting the formation of aluminum clusters. Between 15 and 40 ps, as the reaction progressed, the RDX molecules underwent complete decomposition, the particles expanded significantly, and the system was filled with gaseous products and free radicals. As a consequence of thermal motion, the oxide clusters collided with one another at 40 ps.
In the subsequent reactions, the number of the oxide clusters decreased, while the number of atoms contained in each cluster increased. Upon the completion of the pyrolysis process, the aluminum clusters produced within the system were predominantly of the alumina type. This is in agreement with previous studies conducted by Ji et al. [25,26]. Figures S1 and S2 in the Supplementary Information illustrate the decomposition process of the HMX@AlH3 and CL-20@AlH3 NPs at 2400 K, respectively. It was found that the decomposition processes of the HMX@AlH3 and CL-20@AlH3 NPs were analogous to that of the RDX@AlH3 NPs.
3.2. Evolution of Total Species
Figure 3a–d illustrate the evolution of the total number of species for the types of AlH3-containing explosive NPs at 2100, 2400, 2700, and 3000 K, respectively. As illustrated in Figure 3e, the maximum value of the total number of species for the three systems was observed to increase with the increasing reaction temperature. This suggests that elevated temperatures can accelerate the decomposition of the reactants during the initial decomposition. As the reaction progressed, the total number of species in the three systems gradually approached an equilibrium. At the temperature from 2400 to 3000 K, the number of final species in the three systems exhibited a minimal discrepancy. Nevertheless, at 2100 K, the total number of species in the CL-20@AlH3 NP system was markedly higher than those for the RDX and HMX@AlH3 NPs. This was due to the fact that the CL-20 molecules are more sensitive to thermal stimuli than the RDX and HMX molecules. Consequently, at lower temperatures, the CL-20 molecules decomposed more completely at a faster rate, resulting in the generation of significantly more molecular fragments than the RDX and HMX@AlH3 NPs.
As illustrated in Figure 3f, the total number of species for the three systems exhibited a decline with the increasing reaction temperature in the final stage of the reaction. This was due to the formation of numerous aluminum oxide clusters in the end of the reaction. The high reactivity of the aluminum atoms in the systems allowed them to react with the C, H, O, and N atoms in the RDX, HMX, and CL-20 molecules, consequently forming aluminized clusters and reducing the total number of species.
3.3. Gas Products
In order to gain detailed insights into the evolution of the gas products during the pyrolysis of the types of AlH3-containing explosive NPs, we employed C++ scripts to count the fragments in each system. The selected bond lengths were set to be 1.1 times longer than the standard bond length [8]. Poshevnev et al. [33] determined the gas evolution occurring during the initial pyrolysis of AlH3 at temperatures below 100 °C. Figure 4 illustrates the evolution of the gas products in the RDX@AlH3 NPs at 2100, 2400, 2700, and 3000 K. As illustrated, during the initial decomposition stage, the number of the intermediate products NO and NO2 increased first and then decreased. Furthermore, the formation rate of NO was lower than that of NO2, indicating that the formation of NO2 was more likely to occur. It was determined that NO2 was produced during the decomposition of RDX, typically via the cleavage of the N-NO2 bond, as evidenced by the observed trajectory. There are three distinct initial decomposition pathways: (i) N-NO2 homolysis; (ii) HONO elimination; (iii) ring-opening reactions. In addition, the incorporation of aluminized hydride shells did not result in any alteration in the initial decomposition mechanism of the three explosives. It could also be observed that the differences between the maxima of the number of NO2 and NO fragments decreased with the increasing temperature. At 3000 K, the maximum value of NO exceeded that of NO2, indicating that the O-NO bond cleavage was thermodynamically a more favorable path. Furthermore, as the reaction progressed, NO underwent further reactions with the Al atoms, resulting in the formation of N2. The concentration of NO subsequently reached a peak, then began to decline, and ultimately reached zero.
As illustrated in Figure 4, the increasing rate of H2 formation was essentially consistent at different temperatures, with the evolution of the number of H2 fragments exhibiting a similar trend. This suggests that the AlH3 shell is a self-dehydrogenating substance, almost unaffected by the temperature. In the mid-stage of the decomposition, the elevated temperature had a slight promoting effect on the release of H2, due to the acceleration of the decomposition of RDX at high temperatures. From Figure 4, it can be observed that the yields of H2O, CO2, and N2 increased with the rising temperature. The final yields of the four stabilization products were in the order of H2O > H2, N2 > CO2 (2100–2700 K). Meanwhile, in the last stage, the yields of H2 and N2 were approximately equal, and at 3000 K, they increased in the order of H2O > N2 > H2 > CO2.
Figures S3 and S4 in the Supplementary Information illustrate the evolution of the number of gas products in the HMX@AlH3 and CL-20@AlH3 NPs at different temperatures, respectively. The evolution of the number of gas products in the HMX@AlH3 NP system was consistent with that of the RDX@AlH3 NPs during pyrolysis. However, in the CL-20@AlH3 NPs, the number of final products at 2100 K increased in the following order: H2O > H2 > N2 > CO2. In the temperature range from 2400 to 3000 K, the yields of the products increased in the order of H2O > N2 > H2 > CO2, which differs significantly from the results observed for the RDX and HMX@AlH3 NPs. This may be because CL-20 is very sensitive to the temperature and has a high nitrogen content. This might result in a distinct change in the amount of N2 produced, as observed in the CL-20@AlH3 NPs, in comparison with the RDX and HMX@AlH3 NPs. It is worthy to note that the CL-20 molecule has the highest nitrogen content, resulting in the highest yield of N2 among the three explosives.
3.4. Reaction Kinetics
Figure 5 illustrates the evolution of the number of RDX, HMX, and CL-20 molecules with time at different temperatures. It was observed that the CL-20 molecules consistently decomposed prior to the RDX and HMX molecules at equivalent temperatures. This was due to the fact that the CL-20 molecules are more sensitive to thermal stimuli and thus decompose more readily. The reaction rate constant k for each of the three explosive molecules was obtained by fitting a first-order rate model of the reactants over time, which can be described by the following Equation (1):
Nt = N0 exp[−k(t − t0)] | (1) |
where k is the reaction rate constant, t0 is the time at which the initial decomposition occurs, k is the initial reaction rate constant, N0 is the amount of reactants at the start of the reaction, and Nt is the amount of reactants at any time. The thermal decomposition rate constant k of the three nanoparticles is presented in Table 2 together with their complete decomposition times.
Table 2.
RDX@AlH3 NP | HMX@AlH3 NP | CL-20@AlH3 NP | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
t, ps | k, ps−1 | t, ps | k, ps−1 | t, ps | k, ps−1 | |
2100 K | 59.6 | 0.257 | 36.4 | 0.246 | 14.5 | 0.514 |
2400 K | 30.1 | 0.468 | 27.1 | 0.306 | 14.2 | 0.848 |
2700 K | 20.8 | 0.364 | 18.5 | 0.404 | 9.3 | 1.722 |
3000 K | 15.6 | 0.282 | 13.8 | 0.563 | 6.2 | 5.522 |
As can be observed from Table 2, the rate constant increased in line with the increasing temperature. This suggests that elevated temperatures facilitated the decomposition of the explosive molecules, thereby reducing the overall decomposition time. Furthermore, the RDX molecule required the longest time to complete the decomposition, indicating that it is the most resistant to thermal stimuli.
3.5. Cluster Analysis
The pyrolysis of the three types of AlH3-containing explosive NPs at elevated temperatures resulted in the production of not only many gaseous products, but also a solid mixture of aluminum and carbon clusters. It was demonstrated that carbon clusters can be produced during the detonation of explosives [34,35]. The RMD has been effectively employed to investigate the formation of carbon clusters during the detonation of explosives [36]. Figure 6 illustrates the structural composition of the AlmOn clusters and their fundamental units in the three types of AlH3-containing explosive NPs at 2400 K. As illustrated, the clusters in the three types of nanoparticles exhibited a spherical structure and were stacked by similar primitives. The fundamental unit was a zeolite-like three-dimensional structure, as depicted in Figure 6d.
Figure 7 illustrates the structure of the AlmCn clusters in the three types of AlH3-containing explosive NPs. It was demonstrated that the AlmCn clusters exist as small molecules and fragments in the RDX@AlH3, HMX@AlH3, and CL-20@AlH3 NPs [22]. Furthermore, Ji et al. demonstrated that the AlmCn and AlmOn clusters are the primary constituents of solid-state aluminized clusters, with AlmNn clusters distributed among them. This finding is consistent with our RMD simulation results. In addition, the simulated results indicated that there were no AlmHn clusters within the aluminized clusters. This was attributed to the inherent instability of the Al-O bond at elevated temperatures, which renders it susceptible to fracture.
4. Conclusions
In this work, the RMD was employed to investigate the thermal decomposition of three types of AlH3-containing explosive NPs at high temperatures (2100, 2400, 2700, and 3000 K). It was demonstrated that the CL-20 molecules in the CL-20@AlH3 NPs decomposed at a faster rate than the other molecules in the other NPs. An increase in the temperature resulted in a faster initial decomposition rate of the explosive molecules. The evolution of gaseous products during the decomposition of the HMX@AlH3 NPs and CL-20@AlH3 NPs followed a similar trend to that observed for RDX. The primary initial decomposition mechanisms of the three explosives were as follows: (i) N-NO2 homolysis; (ii) HONO elimination; (iii) ring-opening reactions. The variation in the yield of final products with the temperature in the CL-20@AlH3 NP system was different from those in the RDX@AlH3 and HMX@AlH3 NPs. There was a large number of solid aluminized clusters produced in the decomposition, mainly AlmOn and AlmCn clusters, together with AlmNn clusters dispersed in the AlmOn clusters. The AlmOn clusters showed a sphere-like structure and a packing basic unit, similar to zeolite with three-dimensional structure. In contrast, the AlmCn clusters existed in the form of small molecules and fragments. Our results may provide a theoretical basis for understanding the reaction mechanisms of metal hydride composite explosives and for the design of high-energy aluminized explosives.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano14221859/s1, Figure S1. Snapshots of the morphology the decomposition process of the HMX@AlH3 at 2400 K. Figure S2. Snapshots of the morphology the decomposition process of the CL-20@AlH3 at 2400 K. Figure S3. Time evolution of the products of the HMX@AlH3 NP at 2100, 2400, 2700, and 3000 K. Figure S4. Time evolution of the products of the CL-20@AlH3 NP at 2100, 2400, 2700, and 3000 K.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Z.S. and W.Z.; Software, L.Y. (Lei Yang), L.Y. (Lixin Ye) and J.F.; Validation, Z.S., L.Y. (Lei Yang), H.L. and L.Y. (Lixin Ye); Formal analysis, L.Y. (Lei Yang), H.L., M.M. and J.F.; Investigation, Z.S.; Resources, W.Z.; Data curation, H.L. and M.M.; Writing—original draft, Z.S.; Writing—review & editing, W.Z.; Supervision, W.Z.; Project administration, W.Z.; Funding acquisition, W.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Data Availability Statement
Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Dilmaç A.M., Spuling E., de Meijere A., Bräse S. Propellanes from a Chemical Curiosity to “Explosive” Materials and Natural Products. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017;56:5684. doi: 10.1002/anie.201603951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Millar R.W., Hamid J., Endsor R., Swinton P.F., Cooper J. Selection and Synthesis of Energetic Heterocyclic Compounds Suitable for Use in Insensitive Explosive and Propellant Compositions. Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 2008;33:66–72. doi: 10.1002/prep.200800211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chakraborty D., Muller R.P., Dasgupta S., Goddard W.A. The Mechanism for Unimolecular Decomposition of RDX (1,3,5-Trinitro-1,3,5-Triazine), an Ab Initio Study. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2000;104:2261–2272. doi: 10.1021/jp9936953. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Khan M.A., Sharma A., Yadav S., Celin S.M., Sharma S., Noureldeen A., Darwish H. Enhancing Remediation of RDX-Contaminated Soil by Introducing Microbial Formulation Technology Coupled with Biostimulation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021;9:106019. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhou T.-T., Huang F.-L. Effects of Defects on Thermal Decomposition of HMX via ReaxFF Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2011;115:278–287. doi: 10.1021/jp105805w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang F., Chen L., Geng D., Wu J., Lu J., Wang C. Thermal Decomposition Mechanism of CL-20 at Different Temperatures by ReaxFF Reactive Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2018;122:3971–3979. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b01256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nair U.R., Gore G.M., Sivabalan R., Divekar C.N., Asthana S.N., Singh H. Studies on Advanced CL-20-Based Composite Modified Double-Base Propellants. J. Propuls. Power. 2004;20:952–955. doi: 10.2514/1.8761. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nie Z., Gao W., Jiang H., Zhao F., Zheng G., Zhang Z. Flameless Venting Characteristics of Hydrogen Explosion under the Coupling of Carbon Dioxide and Metal Foam. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023;180:375–385. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2023.10.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rasul M.G., Hazrat M.A., Sattar M.A., Jahirul M.I., Shearer M.J. The Future of Hydrogen: Challenges on Production, Storage and Applications. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022;272:116326. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116326. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yu M.-H., Yang S.-L., Xie W.-X., Zhu Z.-Y., Li H.-P., Yan Q.-L. Enhanced Stability and Combustion Performance of AlH3 in Combination with Commonly Used Oxidizers. Fuel. 2023;331:125741. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125741. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhu C., Gao W., Jiang H., Xue C., Zhu Z., Tang G. A Comparative Investigation of the Explosion Mechanism of Metal Hydride AlH3 Dust and Al/H2 Mixture. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2024;50:1296–1305. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.10.178. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Song L., Zhao F.-Q., Xu S.-Y., Ye C.-C., Ju X.-H. Structural Evolution of Aluminum Hydride Nanoparticles in Water Using ReaxFF Molecular Dynamics Method. Mater. Today Commun. 2021;26:101804. doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101804. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.DeLuca L.T., Galfetti L., Severini F., Rossettini L., Meda L., Marra G., D’Andrea B., Weiser V., Calabro M., Vorozhtsov A.B., et al. Physical and Ballistic Characterization of AlH3-Based Space Propellants. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2007;11:18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2006.08.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Young G., Piekiel N., Chowdhury S., Zachariah M.R. Ignition Behavior of α-AlH 3. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2010;182:1341–1359. doi: 10.1080/00102201003694834. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bazyn T., Eyer R., Krier H., Glumac N. Combustion Characteristics of Aluminum Hydride at Elevated Pressure and Temperature. J. Propuls. Power. 2004;20:427–431. doi: 10.2514/1.3160. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chen L., Wang H., Wang F., Geng D., Wu J., Lu J. Thermal Decomposition Mechanism of 2,2′,4,4′,6,6′-Hexanitrostilbene by ReaxFF Reactive Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2018;122:19309–19318. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b03463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lin Z., Zhu J., Huang Q., Zhu L., Li W., Yu W. Mechanism Exploration of the Effect of Polyamines on the Polishing Rate of Silicon Chemical Mechanical Polishing: A Study Combining Simulations and Experiments. Nanomaterials. 2024;14:127. doi: 10.3390/nano14010127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Strachan A., Kober E.M., Van Duin A.C.T., Oxgaard J., Goddard W.A. Thermal Decomposition of RDX from Reactive Molecular Dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 2005;122:054502. doi: 10.1063/1.1831277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sun Z., Ji J., Zhu W. Effects of Nanoparticle Size on the Thermal Decomposition Mechanisms of 3,5-Diamino-6-Hydroxy-2-Oxide-4-Nitropyrimidone through ReaxFF Large-Scale Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Molecules. 2023;29:56. doi: 10.3390/molecules29010056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vo T., Reeder B., Damone A., Newell P. Effect of Domain Size, Boundary, and Loading Conditions on Mechanical Properties of Amorphous Silica: A Reactive Molecular Dynamics Study. Nanomaterials. 2019;10:54. doi: 10.3390/nano10010054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhang H.-R., Zhang X.-X., Fu X., Liu J., Qi X., Yan Q.-L. Decomposition Mechanisms of Insensitive 2D Energetic Polymer TAGP Using ReaxFF Molecular Dynamics Simulation Combined with Pyro-GC/MS Experiments. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2022;162:105453. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105453. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zheng K., Wen Y., Huang B., Wang J., Chen J., Xie G., Lv G., Liu J., Qiao Z., Yang G. The Solid Phase Thermal Decomposition and Nanocrystal Effect of Hexahydro-1,3,5-Trinitro-1,3,5-Triazine (RDX) via ReaxFF Large-Scale Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019;21:17240–17252. doi: 10.1039/C9CP01482A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Li G., Gao W., Jiang H., Liu J., Zhao F., Jin S., Lu Z. Ignition and combustion of AlH3-nanoparticles: A molecular dynamics study. Combust. Flame. 2024;269:113667. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2024.113667. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mei Z., Li C.-F., Zhao F.-Q., Xu S.-Y., Ju X.-H. Reactive Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Thermal Decomposition for Nano-AlH3/TNT and Nano-AlH3/CL-20 Composites. J. Mater. Sci. 2019;54:7016–7027. doi: 10.1007/s10853-019-03364-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ji J., Zhu W. Thermal Decomposition of Core–Shell Structured HMX@Al Nanoparticle Simulated by Reactive Molecular Dynamics. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2022;209:111405. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111405. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ji J., Zhu W. Combustion Mechanisms of Core–Shell Structured Aluminized Explosives under Oxygen Atmosphere: Reactive Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2022;215:111822. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111822. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Thompson A.P., Aktulga H.M., Berger R., Bolintineanu D.S., Brown W.M., Crozier P.S., In ’T Veld P.J., Kohlmeyer A., Moore S.G., Nguyen T.D., et al. LAMMPS—A Flexible Simulation Tool for Particle-Based Materials Modeling at the Atomic, Meso, and Continuum Scales. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2022;271:108171. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bolotina N.B., Hardie M.J., Speer Jr R.L., Pinkerton A.A. Energetic Materials: Variable-Temperature Crystal Structures of γ- and ε-HNIW Polymorphs. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2004;37:808–814. doi: 10.1107/S0021889804017832. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Palmer S.J.P., Field J.E. The Deformation and Fracture of β-HMX. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Math. Phys. Sci. 1982;383:399–407. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1982.0137. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Choi C.S., Prince E. The Crystal Structure of Cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine. Acta Crystallogr. B. 1972;28:2857–2862. doi: 10.1107/S0567740872007046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhong K., Liu J., Wang L., Zhang C. Influence of Atmospheres on the Initial Thermal Decomposition of 1,3,5-Trinitro-1,3,5-Triazinane: Reactive Molecular Dynamics Simulation. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2019;123:1483–1493. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10360. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ismail I.M.K., Hawkins T. Kinetics of Thermal Decomposition of Aluminium Hydride: I-Non-Isothermal Decomposition under Vacuum and in Inert Atmosphere (Argon) Thermochim. Acta. 2005;439:32–43. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2005.08.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Song L., Xu S.-Y., Zhao F.-Q., Ju X.-H. Atomistic Insight into Dehydrogenation and Oxidation of Aluminum Hydride Nanoparticles (AHNPs) in Reaction with Gaseous Oxides at High Temperature. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2021;46:8091–8103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dolmatov V.Y., Myllymäki V., Vehanen A. A Possible Mechanism of Nanodiamond Formation during Detonation Synthesis. J. Superhard Mater. 2013;35:143–150. doi: 10.3103/S1063457613030039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Van Thiel M., Ree F.H. Properties of Carbon Clusters in TNT Detonation Products: Graphite-Diamond Transition. J. Appl. Phys. 1987;62:1761–1767. doi: 10.1063/1.339575. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang L., Zybin S.V., Van Duin A.C.T., Dasgupta S., Goddard W.A., Kober E.M. Carbon Cluster Formation during Thermal Decomposition of Octahydro-1,3,5,7-Tetranitro-1,3,5,7-Tetrazocine and 1,3,5-Triamino-2,4,6-Trinitrobenzene High Explosives from ReaxFF Reactive Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2009;113:10619–10640. doi: 10.1021/jp901353a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.