Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1997 Nov 1;504(Pt 3):735–745. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1997.735bd.x

Firing pattern of type-identified wrist extensor motor units during wrist extension and hand clenching in humans.

H Sturm 1, A Schmied 1, J P Vedel 1, S Pagni 1
PMCID: PMC1159975  PMID: 9401979

Abstract

1. Single motor unit activity was investigated in the extensor carpi radialis muscles during voluntary isometric contraction involving either the coactivation of the wrist agonist extensor muscles (wrist extension) or the coactivation of the wrist and finger antagonist extensor and flexor muscles (hand clenching). 2. The motor units were found to be activated at a similar level of motoneurone pool drive during both wrist extension and hand clenching, as indicated by the fact that the EMG activity at which they were recruited was practically the same in both cases (mean +/- S.D.: 20 +/- 26 and 21 +/- 25 mV, respectively). In addition, the net excitatory drive exerted on the motoneurones, as assessed from the mean interspike intervals, did not differ significantly between the two tasks (mean +/- S.D.: 104.57 +/- 17.24 and 103.01 +/- 16.26 ms, for wrist extension and hand clenching, respectively). 3. However, the discharge variability, in terms of the coefficient of variation of the interspike intervals, was slightly but significantly greater during hand clenching than during wrist extension (0.213 +/- 0.049 and 0.198 +/- 0.045, respectively). This increase involved all types of motor units, regardless of their contractile force. 4. We suggest that the greater motoneurone discharge variability observed during hand clenching may be attributable to an increase in the synaptic noise. This increase might be due to the activation of numerous afferent pathways mediating reciprocal interactions between antagonist motoneurone pools, as well as to the activation of hand cutaneous receptors that play a major role in the regulation of handling and gripping motor activities.

Full text

PDF
735

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aymard C., Decchi B., Katz R., Lafitte C., Pénicaud A., Raoul S., Rossi A. Recurrent inhibition between motor nuclei innervating opposing wrist muscles in the human upper limb. J Physiol. 1997 Feb 15;499(Pt 1):267–282. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp021925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brownstone R. M., Jordan L. M., Kriellaars D. J., Noga B. R., Shefchyk S. J. On the regulation of repetitive firing in lumbar motoneurones during fictive locomotion in the cat. Exp Brain Res. 1992;90(3):441–455. doi: 10.1007/BF00230927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burke R. E., Jankowska E., ten Bruggencate G. A comparison of peripheral and rubrospinal synaptic input to slow and fast twitch motor units of triceps surae. J Physiol. 1970 May;207(3):709–732. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Calvin W. H., Stevens C. F. Synaptic noise and other sources of randomness in motoneuron interspike intervals. J Neurophysiol. 1968 Jul;31(4):574–587. doi: 10.1152/jn.1968.31.4.574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. De Luca C. J., Mambrito B. Voluntary control of motor units in human antagonist muscles: coactivation and reciprocal activation. J Neurophysiol. 1987 Sep;58(3):525–542. doi: 10.1152/jn.1987.58.3.525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Derfler B., Goldberg L. J. Spike train characteristics of single motor units in the human masseter muscle. Exp Neurol. 1978 Sep 15;61(3):592–608. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(78)90026-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Desnedt H. E., Gidaux E. Spinal motoneuron recruitment in man: rank deordering with direction but not with speed of voluntary movement. Science. 1981 Nov 20;214(4523):933–936. doi: 10.1126/science.7302570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Enoka R. M., Robinson G. A., Kossev A. R. Task and fatigue effects on low-threshold motor units in human hand muscle. J Neurophysiol. 1989 Dec;62(6):1344–1359. doi: 10.1152/jn.1989.62.6.1344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eriksson P. O., Stålberg E., Antoni L. Flexibility in motor-unit firing pattern in the human temporal and masseter muscles related to type of activation and location. Arch Oral Biol. 1984;29(9):707–712. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(84)90176-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Feldman A. G. The coactivation command for antagonist muscles involving Ib interneurons in mammalian motor control systems: an electrophysiologically testable model. Neurosci Lett. 1993 Jun 11;155(2):167–170. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(93)90699-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Garland S. J., Cooke J. D., Ohtsuki T. Lack of task-related motor unit activity in human triceps brachii muscle during elbow movements. Neurosci Lett. 1994 Mar 28;170(1):1–4. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(94)90224-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Garnett R., Stephens J. A. Changes in the recruitment threshold of motor units produced by cutaneous stimulation in man. J Physiol. 1981 Feb;311:463–473. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gustafsson B., McCrea D. Influence of stretch-evoked synaptic potentials on firing probability of cat spinal motoneurones. J Physiol. 1984 Feb;347:431–451. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hubbard J. I., Stenhouse D., Eccles R. M. Origin of synaptic noise. Science. 1967 Jul 21;157(3786):330–331. doi: 10.1126/science.157.3786.330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Johansson R. S., Vallbo A. B. Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. J Physiol. 1979 Jan;286:283–300. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jones K. E., Bawa P., McMillan A. S. Recruitment of motor units in human flexor carpi ulnaris. Brain Res. 1993 Feb 5;602(2):354–356. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(93)90702-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jones K. E., Lyons M., Bawa P., Lemon R. N. Recruitment order of motoneurons during functional tasks. Exp Brain Res. 1994;100(3):503–508. doi: 10.1007/BF02738409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jongen H. A., Denier van der Gon J. J., Gielen C. C. Inhomogeneous activation of motoneurone pools as revealed by co-contraction of antagonistic human arm muscles. Exp Brain Res. 1989;75(3):555–562. doi: 10.1007/BF00249906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kanda K., Burke R. E., Walmsley B. Differential control of fast and slow twitch motor units in the decerebrate cat. Exp Brain Res. 1977 Aug 8;29(1):57–74. doi: 10.1007/BF00236875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kernell D. Organized variability in the neuromuscular system: a survey of task-related adaptations. Arch Ital Biol. 1992 Jan;130(1):19–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Loeb G. E. Motoneurone task groups: coping with kinematic heterogeneity. J Exp Biol. 1985 Mar;115:137–146. doi: 10.1242/jeb.115.1.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Matthews P. B. Relationship of firing intervals of human motor units to the trajectory of post-spike after-hyperpolarization and synaptic noise. J Physiol. 1996 Apr 15;492(Pt 2):597–628. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McMillan A. S. Task-related behaviour of motor units in the human temporalis muscle. Exp Brain Res. 1993;94(2):336–342. doi: 10.1007/BF00230303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Midroni G., Ashby P. How synaptic noise may affect cross-correlations. J Neurosci Methods. 1989 Feb;27(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(89)90048-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nielsen J., Kagamihara Y. The regulation of disynaptic reciprocal Ia inhibition during co-contraction of antagonistic muscles in man. J Physiol. 1992 Oct;456:373–391. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nordstrom M. A., Fuglevand A. J., Enoka R. M. Estimating the strength of common input to human motoneurons from the cross-correlogram. J Physiol. 1992;453:547–574. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Person R. S., Kudina L. P. Discharge frequency and discharge pattern of human motor units during voluntary contraction of muscle. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1972 May;32(5):471–483. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90058-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Riek S., Bawa P. Recruitment of motor units in human forearm extensors. J Neurophysiol. 1992 Jul;68(1):100–108. doi: 10.1152/jn.1992.68.1.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schmied A., Vedel J. P., Calvin-Figuière S., Rossi-Durand C., Pagni S. Task-dependence of muscle afferent monosynaptic inputs to human extensor carpi radialis motoneurones. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Jun;105(3):220–234. doi: 10.1016/s0924-980x(97)00015-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schmied A., Vedel J. P., Pagni S. Human spinal lateralization assessed from motoneurone synchronization: dependence on handedness and motor unit type. J Physiol. 1994 Oct 15;480(Pt 2):369–387. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Shiavi R., Negin M. Stochastic properties of motoneuron activity and the effect of muscular length. Biol Cybern. 1975 Sep 18;19(4):231–237. doi: 10.1007/BF02281973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Thomas C. K., Ross B. H., Calancie B. Human motor-unit recruitment during isometric contractions and repeated dynamic movements. J Neurophysiol. 1987 Jan;57(1):311–324. doi: 10.1152/jn.1987.57.1.311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Thomas C. K., Ross B. H., Stein R. B. Motor-unit recruitment in human first dorsal interosseous muscle for static contractions in three different directions. J Neurophysiol. 1986 May;55(5):1017–1029. doi: 10.1152/jn.1986.55.5.1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Thomas J. S., Schmidt E. M., Hambrecht F. T. Facility of motor unit control during tasks defined directly in terms of unit behaviors. Exp Neurol. 1978 May 1;59(3):384–397. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(78)90230-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES