Skip to main content
BMC Genomics logoLink to BMC Genomics
. 2024 Nov 27;25:1144. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10999-4

Genomics reveal local skin immune response key to control sarcoptic mange in Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica)

Arián Ráez-Bravo 1, José Enrique Granados 2, José Espinosa 3, Lara Nonell 4, Emmanuel Serrano 1,, Eulàlia Puigdecanet 4, Marta Bódalo 4, Jesús M Pérez 5, Ramón C Soriguer 6,7, Francisco Javier Cano-Manuel 2, Paulino Fandos 8, Jorge Ramón López-Olvera 1,
PMCID: PMC11600671  PMID: 39604877

Abstract

Background

Sarcoptic mange is an emerging and neglected contagious skin disease caused by the mite Sarcoptes scabiei, affecting humans, domestic animals, and wildlife. Mange is the main disease and a major concern for the management and conservation of populations of Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica), a medium-sized mountain ungulate endemic to the Iberian Peninsula and Northern Pyrenees. Differences in host-parasite interaction and host immune response determine mange clinical outcome, but little is known about the related differences in gene expression. This study determined blood and skin gene expressions in S. scabiei-experimentally infested Iberian ibexes.

Results

Infestation with S. scabiei promoted immune and inflammatory genomic responses both in skin and blood, with two different clinical outcomes: either severe infestation or recovery. Sarcoptes scabiei induced local skin immunosuppression to favour its multiplication and establishment of the infestation in the host. Skin gene expression was mostly inflammatory and inefficient to control mange in the severely infected ibexes. Conversely, the immune skin response of the recovered ibexes effectively recognised S. scabiei and activated T-cells, limiting the infestation. Consequently, inflammation-related genes were more expressed in the blood of the severely infested ibexes than in those that recovered.

Conclusions

The results demonstrate that skin local cellular immune response is key to control sarcoptic mange and prevent the systemic spread of the disease and the associated inflammatory response. These results will be useful to understand the pathogenesis and drivers of the differential outcome of mange at individual scale, and the population and ecological consequences of such variability in Iberian ibex, as well as in other wildlife species, domestic animals, and humans.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-024-10999-4.

Keywords: Gene expression, Gene set enrichment analysis, Genomic response, Immune response, Microarray, Sarcoptes scabiei

Background

Sarcoptic mange is a contagious skin disease caused by the mite Sarcoptes scabiei. It is considered an emerging, reemerging and neglected disease in humans, domestic animals, and wildlife [16]. Sarcoptes scabiei is a generalist parasite capable of establishing and sustaining transmission in different host species and populations through host immune response modulation, on-host movement capacity, off-host seeking behaviour, and environmental persistence [7]. Mange can course with pruritus, scaling, alopecia, erythematous crusted papules, hyperkeratosis, crust formation and, in chronic lesions, lichenification, known in humans as Norwegian or crusted scabies. However, a mild slightly symptomatic form known as ordinary scabies is more frequent in humans [810]. Such differences in the clinical presentation of the disease are not related to variability in mite pathogenicity but to differences in the capability of the immune response of the host to cope with the infestation [8, 11, 12]. However, the gene expression bases of differential immune response in scabietic hosts have only been limitedly investigated in domestic animals and humans [1317], although gene expression studies can contribute to advance in the knowledge of the pathogenesis of diseases [1821].

In wildlife, the individual clinical expression and mortality outcome and, consequently, the demographic effects of diseases in free-ranging populations can be related to interindividual differences of the host, the pathogen and/or the environment [22]. Sarcoptic mange has been reported in different wild ungulate species in Europe, including chamois (Rupicapra spp.) [6, 2325], both Alpine and Iberian ibex (Capra ibex and C. pyrenaica, respectively) [6, 24, 2629], Barbary sheep (Ammotragus lervia) [24, 30], mouflon (Ovis gmelini) [24, 31], fallow, red, and roe deer (Dama dama, Cervus elaphus, and Capreolus capreolus, respectively) [24, 3133], and wild boar (Sus scrofa) [34, 35]. However, the host-mite interaction established at individual scale will determine differences among host species, and even among populations of the same species, in the epidemiological, mortality, demographic, and genetic consequences of sarcoptic mange in wildlife [7, 36, 37].

Among the aforementioned species, Iberian ibex is a valuable mountain ungulate as an Iberian Peninsula endemism and a big game species [38, 39]. Sarcoptic mange is considered the main health concern for its management and conservation [29, 40]. High mortality rates related to sarcoptic mange epizootics have been reported in Iberian ibex populations, with varying demographic consequences in the populations affected [26, 4144]. Moreover, resistance and survival to sarcoptic mange have been reported in free-ranging ibexes naturally infested from Sierra Nevada Natural and National Park (SNNNP) [45, 46], and in experimentally-infested ibexes as well [11, 47, 48]. However, the individual intrinsic factors for such different outcomes in resistance and the demographic population consequences in Iberian ibex are mostly unknown, including gene expression. Gene expression studies are required to provide insight on the pathogenesis of sarcoptic mange in Iberian ibex, to advance in the knowledge of the pathogenesis and population consequences of this disease in this species but also as a model for other wildlife species, domestic animals, and even human genomic response to S. scabiei infestation.

The aims of the study are: (1) to characterize skin and blood gene expressions in Iberian ibexes experimentally infested with S. scabiei; and (2) to identify the biological processes and pathways determining the differences in the clinical outcome to sarcoptic mange in Iberian ibex.

Materials and methods

Experimental infestation with S. scabiei

Eighteen Iberian ibexes (ten females one- to six-year-old and eight males one- to three-year-old, Table 1) from a stock reservoir protected from exposure to S. scabiei located in SNNNP [48, 49] were moved to “Las Mimbres” facilities at Sierra de Huétor Natural Park (Granada, Spain). After an eight-week adaption period, 12 of the Iberian ibexes were infested with S. scabiei using skin pieces of a naturally parasitized wild ibex, whereas the remaining six ibexes were maintained as controls. The scabietic skin pieces were attached with elastic bandages to the inter-scapular region, previously shaved to induce contact between the mites and the host skin. The mite load in the skin pieces applied to each ibex was 750 ± 440 mites, estimated according to previously reported protocols [50, 51].

Table 1.

Iberian ibexes (Capra pyrenaica) experimentally infested with Sarcoptes scabiei and sampled for genomic analysis

Experimental group Identification Sex Age (years) Percentage of skin lesions at sampling (day 131 post- infestation)
Control 10 Female 3 0
12 Female 2 0
23 Male 1 0
27 Female 6 0
35 Male 3 0
45 Female 4 0
Infested

Recovered

(≤ 25% skin lesion)

9 Male 5 25
29 Female 4 5
40 Male 1 3
44 Male 2 0
Mean 8.25

Severely infested

(> 70% skin lesion)

4 Female 6 100
7 Female 2 70
8 Male 4 90
18 Male 3 700
20 Female 2 80
31 Female 1 100
33 Male 3 70
43 Female 3 100
Mean 88.75

Clinical assessment and sample collection

Clinical signs, including the presence of mangy skin lesions and the skin surface affected, were monitored during the 150-day infestation study period. The percentage of the whole-body skin surface affected by lesions compatible with sarcoptic mange was visually estimated as previously reported [50, 5254]. By day 131 post-infestation, whole blood samples were collected from the jugular vein in commercially available tubes with ribonucleic acid (RNA) preservation buffer (PAXgene™ blood RNA tubes, QIAGEN, Hilde, Germany). Skin biopsies were also obtained the same day using an 8-mm diameter punch biopsy tool and were placed in disposable tubes with RNAlater® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) solution. The samples were stored at -80ºC until analysis. According to the protocol approved by the corresponding animal ethics committee and following European and Spanish legislation (see Ethics approval section), at day 150 post-infestation 8 of the 12 experimentally infected ibexes were euthanized due to their severe terminal mange condition (Table 1). The ibexes were anaesthetized by intramuscular injection with a mixture of xylazine (3 mg/kg) and ketamine (3 mg/kg) [11, 55]. Once unconscious, they were euthanized with an intravenous injection of T-61® (embutramide 12 mg/kg, membezonium iodide 3 mg/kg, tetracaine 0.3 mg/kg) [11].

Gene expression analysis

RNA was extracted using the PAXgene kit (QIAGEN, Hilde, Germany) for blood samples and the RNeasy mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilde, Germany) for skin samples. The samples were processed according to the following Affymetrix protocols: GeneChip WT PLUS Reagent kit (P/N 703174 Rev. 2) and Expression Wash, Stain and Scan User Manual (P/N 702731 Rev. 3) (Affymetrix Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). Gene expression was measured with microarrays using the Ovine Gene 1.0 ST array (Affymetrix™, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and genes were noted using the annotation file provided by Affymetrix for the OviGene-1.0 ST array.

After processing, the data were quality-controlled and normalized using the Robust Multi-array Average algorithm (RMA) [56] included in the aroma.affymetrix package [57]. The statistical analyses were performed using R software version 3.5.0 [58] and Bioconductor packages [59]. Linear models were used to assess differential gene expression among the different clinical outcomes with the limma package [60]. The sva Package [61] from Bioconductor was used in order to estimate batch and other artefacts into surrogate variables which were included as covariates into the limma model.

Differences in gene expression were studied between the control and the infested ibexes (as a whole and for each clinical outcome separately), and between the recovered infested ibexes and those severely infested. Genes were considered differentially expressed when the p-value was lower than 0.05 and the log fold-change was higher than 0.58 or lower than -0.58, corresponding to an absolute value of fold change over 1.5 [62, 63].

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was used in order to retrieve functional pathways. This method links the obtained gene expression profile with gene sets available in the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) [64, 65]. Gene sets in MSigDB are grouped in different collections, from which C2 KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes) curated gene sets and C5 GO (Gene Ontology) biological process were used in this study. The GSEA software was used with the option Pre-Ranked Analysis to rank genes using the p-values obtained in the Differential Expression analysis with limma package. The ranked list of genes was generated using the score [-log(p-value)*sign(fold change)] for each gene. The gene sets were filtered by a nominal p-value of 0.05 and a false discovery rate (FDR, q-value) of 0.1.

The differences in the functional pathways were investigated among the same groups as the differences in gene expression using the GO biological process collection. Moreover, the KEGG collection was used to further investigate the differences between the recovered infested ibexes and those severely infested.

Results

Clinical signs

None of the control ibexes developed skin lesions. At sampling on day 131 post-infestation, four of the infested ibexes developed skin lesions in less or equal than 25% of the body surface, which then decreased to even achieve complete healing (recovered ibexes). Conversely, at sampling the remaining eight ibexes had developed lesions in more than 70% of the skin surface, which continue to progress in all cases (severely infested ibexes) (Tables 1 and 2, Supplementary material Fig. 1).

Table 2.

Percentage of the whole-body skin surface affected by skin lesions compatible with sarcoptic mange in the control, recovered and severely infested Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica) experimentally infested with Sarcoptes scabiei

Days post-infestations
0 4 13 26 33 46 61 75 103 120 131 150
Control
 C1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 C2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 C3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 C4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 C5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 C6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Recovered
 R1 0 0 1 1 1 5 10 15 20 25 25 15
 R2 0 0 0 1 3 5 15 15 10 10 5 3
 R3 0 0 1 3 3 5 10 10 5 5 3 0
 R4 0 0 1 3 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Severely infested
 SI1 0 0 0 3 3 5 25 55 100 100 100 100
 SI2 0 0 0 1 1 5 10 15 30 70 70 85
 SI3 0 0 0 1 3 5 15 20 80 90 90 95
 SI4 0 0 0 3 3 5 15 20 85 95 100 100
 SI5 0 0 0 3 3 5 10 20 30 30 80 90
 SI6 0 0 1 5 10 15 20 50 80 100 100 100
 SI7 0 0 0 5 5 10 10 15 30 40 70 85
 SI8 0 0 1 1 3 5 25 50 100 100 100 100

Gene expression

Table 3 and Supplementary material Fig. 2 show the numbers of up-regulated and down-regulated genes found for each of the comparisons performed (infested versus control ibexes; recovered versus control ibexes, severely infested versus control ibexes; and, finally, recovered versus severely infested ibexes). A significant percentage of these genes were related to the immune response to the mite S. scabiei and the related lesional and inflammatory skin disorder (Table 3, Supplementary material Fig. 2). Thus, the genes up-regulated in the infested ibexes altogether as compared to the controls included interleukins 36, beta and gamma; chemokine (C–C motif) ligands 7, 8 and 20 and receptors 1 and 2; interleukin receptors 13 and 15; interleukin-8-like; and lactotransferrin, among others (Supplementary material Table 1). However, the number of differentially expressed genes as compared to controls was higher for the severely infested than for the recovered ibexes (Table 3, Supplementary material Fig. 2). When comparing the recovered and the severely infested ibexes, two up-regulated genes related to antigen presentation could be identified both in skin and blood of the recovered ibexes, namely SLA class II histocompatibility antigen and DQ haplotype D alpha chain-like (Supplementary material Table 2). The 260 up-regulated genes in the skin of the recovered ibexes also included genes related both to cellular immunity, such as chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 22, lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1, HLA class II histocompatibility antigen, and DQ alpha 2 chain-like, and to inflammation and allergic response, such as interleukin-37-like; interleukin 1, Alpha; interleukin 33; major allergen I polypeptide chain 1-like; major allergen I polypeptide chain 1-like; interleukin 2 receptor, beta; chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9, 10 and 11, or cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1. In blood, the 53 genes up-regulated in the recovered as compared to the severely infested ibexes included 16 immunity-related ones, such as T-cell receptor-associated transmembrane adapter 1, T-lymphocyte surface antigen Ly-9-like, natural killer cells antigen CD94-like, putative killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor like protein KIR3DP1 or SH2 domain containing 2A (Table 3, Supplementary material Fig. 2, Supplementary material Table 2). Conversely, both in skin (n = 143) and blood (n = 242) the genes down-regulated in the recovered ibexes as compared to the severely infested ones were mostly related to inflammation, such as interleukines (e.g., interleukins 18 and 36) or acute-phase proteins (e.g., serum amyloid A protein; Table 3, Supplementary material Fig. 2, Supplementary material Table 2).

Table 3.

Genes differentially expressed among the groups of Iberian ibexes (Capra pyrenaica) with different sarcoptic mange evolution

Expression change as compared to controls
SKIN BLOOD
Up Down Up Down
TOTAL Immune Lesion and inflammation TOTAL Immune Lesion and inflammation TOTAL Immune Lesion and inflammation TOTAL Immune Lesion and inflammation
Infested altogether 141 18 (12.8%) 30 (21.3%) 295 15 (5.1%) 30 (10.2%) 124 24 (19.4%) 3 (2.4%) 92 22 (23.9%) 3 (3.3%)
Recovered 88 7 (8.0%) 23 (26.1%) 79 4 (5.1%) 7 (8.9%) 52 9 (17.3%) 2 (3.8%) 73 17 (23.3%) 3 (4.1%)
Severely infested 233 30 (12.9%) 28 (12.0%) 493 18 (3.7%) 69 (14.0%) 309 41 (13.3%) 26 (8.4%) 150 31 (20.7%) 8 (5.3%)
Expression change as compared to severely infested
SKIN BLOOD
Up Down Up Down
TOTAL Immune Lesion and inflammation TOTAL Immune Lesion and inflammation TOTAL Immune Lesion and inflammation TOTAL Immune Lesion and inflammation
Recovered 260 23 (8.8%) 57 (21.9%) 143 11 (7.7%) 11 (7.7%) 53 16 (30.2%) 0 (0.0%) 242 28 (11.6%) 25 (10.3%)

Tables 4 and 5, and Supplementary material Figs. 3 and 4 show the differences in the functional pathways assessed using the GO biological process collection between the infested ibexes (altogether and for the recovered and severely infested separately) and the control ones, as well as between the recovered and the severely infested ibexes. Additionally, Tables 6 and 7, Supplementary material Figs. 5 and 6 show the differences between the recovered infested ibexes and those severely infested as investigated using the KEGG collection.

Table 4.

Number of differentially enriched gene sets and percentage included in pathogenically significant processes

Expression changes as compared to controls
SKIN BLOOD
n Biological categories n Biological categories
Infested altogether Up 26

Immunity and inflammation (65%):

- Response to cytokine (23%)

- Response to other organisms (15%)

- Immune system processes (15%)

- Cytokine production (8%)

- Inflammatory response (4%)

383

Immunity and inflammation (22%):

- Response to cytokine (1%)

- Response to other organisms (2%)

- Immune system processes (9%)

- Cytokine production (5%)

- Inflammatory response (2%)

Response to wounding (3%)

Down 209

Cell division (32%):

- Chromosome organization (10%)

- DNA metabolic processes (12%)

- RNA metabolic processes (1%)

- Cell cycle (8%)

- Cell division (1%)

Pigmentation (4%)

Response to radiation (1%)

Immunoglobulin production (2%)

316

Cell division (50%):

- Chromosome organization (8%)

- DNA metabolic processes (14%)

- RNA metabolic processes (20%)

- Cell cycle (3%)

- Gene expression (5%)

Response to radiation (3%)

- Recovered Up 21

Immunity and inflammation (24%):

- Leukocyte differentiation (19%)

- Response to chemokine (5%)

Cell division—Gene expression (14%)

Protein folding (19%)

Response to topologically incorrect protein (19%)

87

Immunity and inflammation (2%):

- Leukocyte migration (1%)

- Response to other organisms (1%)

Response to wounding (2%)

Coagulation (5%)

Down 50

Cell division (16%):

- Chromosome organization (8%)

- DNA metabolic processes (8%)

Metabolic processes (62%)

Pigmentation (12%)

306

Cell division (41%):

- Chromosome organization (7%)

- DNA metabolic processes (7%)

- RNA metabolic processes (21%)

- Cell cycle (1%)

- Gene expression (5%)

Response to radiation (1%)

Immunity and inflammation (11%):

- Immune system processes (9%)

- Cytokine production (2%)

- Severely infested Up 14

Immunity and inflammation (79%):

- Response to cytokine (29%)

- Cytokine production (14%)

- Response to other organisms (29%)

- Lymphocyte migration (7%)

249

Immunity and inflammation (22%):

- Cytokine production (8%)

- Leukocyte processes (7%)

- Innate immune response (3%)

- Inflammatory response (2%)

- Response to other organisms (2%)

Response to wounding (2%)

Coagulation (1%)

Down 209

Cell division (36%):

- Cell cycle (11%)

- Cell division (1%)

- Chromosome organization and segregation (11%)

- DNA metabolic processes (10%)

- RNA metabolic processes (3%)

Immune system processes (2%)

Pigmentation (4%)

700

Cell division (62%):

- Chromosome organization (9%)

- DNA metabolic processes (20%)

- RNA metabolic processes (24%)

- Cell cycle (4%)

- Gene expression (5%)

Metabolic processes (13%)

Immune system processes (4%)

Response to radiation and UV (3%)

Pigmentation (1%)

The differences are presented between the control and the infested Iberian ibexes (Capra pyrenaica), both as a whole and for each of the different clinical outcomes. Data obtained using the GO biological process collection in the GSEA analysis (nominal p-value < 0.05 and FDR < 0.1) both in skin and blood

Table 5.

Number of differentially enriched gene sets and percentage included in pathogenically significant processes

Expression changes as compared to severely infested
SKIN BLOOD
n Biological categories n Biological categories
Recovered Up 79

Cell division (48%):

- Chromosome organization (11%)

- DNA metabolic processes (15%)

- RNA metabolic processes (13%)

- Cell cycle (6%)

- Cell division (3%)

Immunity—B cell proliferation (1%)

Pigmentation (3%)

0
Down 48

Immunity and inflammation (27%):

- Cytokine production (13%)

- Response to cytokine (2%)

- Response to other organisms (6%)

- Immune system processes (4%)

- Inflammatory response (2%)

Metabolic processes (56%):

- Lipid (21%)

- Carbohydrate (10%)

Lipid storage (4%)

330

Immunity and inflammation (36%):

- Cytokine production (12%)

- Response to cytokine (2%)

- Response to other organisms (2%)

- Immune system processes (11%)

- Innate immune response (5%)

- Adaptive immune response (1%)

- Inflammatory response (2%)

Response to wounding (1%)

The differences are presented between the recovered Iberian ibexes (Capra pyrenaica) and those severely infested. Data obtained using the GO biological process collection in the GSEA analysis (nominal p-value < 0.05 and FDR < 0.1) both in skin and blood

Table 6.

Differentially enriched pathways between the recovered and the severely infested Iberian ibexes (Capra pyrenaica)

Expression changes as compared to severely infested
SKIN BLOOD
n Pathways n Pathways
Recovered Up 5

- Antigen processing and presentation

- Cell cycle

- Mismatch repair

- Spliceosome

- Homologous recombination

0
Down 12

- Peroxisome

- PPAR signalling pathway

- Valine leucine and isoleucine degradation

- Galactose metabolism

- Fatty acid metabolism

- Fructose and mannose metabolism

- Glycosaminoglycan degradation

- Starch and sucrose metabolism

- Tryptophan metabolism

- Glycolysis gluconeogenesis

- Adipocytokine signalling pathway

- Olfactory transduction

21

-Leishmania infection

-Toll-like receptor signalling pathway

-NOD-like receptor signalling pathway

-Fc gamma R mediated phagocytosis

-ERBB signalling pathway

-Vibrio cholera infection

-Chemokine signalling pathway

-Epithelial cell signalling in Helicobacter pylori infection

-Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction

-Lysosome

-Glycerophospholipid metabolism

-JAK/STAT signalling pathway

-Glutathione metabolism

-Ether lipid metabolism

-Prostate cancer

-Renal cell carcinoma

-N glycan biosynthesis

-Non-small cell lung cancer

-Fc epsilon RI signalling pathway

-Glioma

-Acute myeloid leukaemia

Pathways determined using the KEGG collection in the GSEA analysis (nominal p-value < 0.05 and FDR < 0.1) in skin and blood. In bold, pathways related with immunity and inflammation

Table 7.

Comparison of the pathways upregulated in the skin and blood of the Iberian ibexes (Capra pyrenaica) experimentally infested with Sarcoptes scabiei as compared to the control

Upregulation as compared to controls
SKIN BLOOD
n Pathways n Pathways
Recovered 12

- Antigen processing and presentation

- Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction*

- Autoimmune thyroid disease

- NOD-like receptor signalling pathway*

- JAK/STAT signalling pathway

- T-cell receptor signalling pathway

- Prion diseases

- Intestinal immune network for IgA production

- Graft versus host disease

- Allograft rejection

- Type I diabetes mellitus

- Asthma

1 - Olfactory transduction
Severely infested 0 8

-Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction*

-Leishmania infection

-NOD-like receptor signalling pathway*

-Toll-like receptor signalling pathway

-Epithelial cell signalling in Helicobacter pylori infection

-Complement and coagulation cascades

-JAK/STAT signalling pathway

-Lysosome

The differences between the recovered and the severely infested ones as compared to the controls are shown. Pathways determined using the KEGG collection in the GSEA analysis (nominal p-value < 0.05 and FDR < 0.1) in skin and blood. In bold, pathways related with immunity and inflammation. The asterisks indicate the pathways upregulated both in the skin of the recovered ibexes and in the blood of the severely infested ones as compared to the controls

Discussion

To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study on genomic response to sarcoptic mange in a wild host species. Up to date, the modulation of gene expression by S. scabiei has been previously studied only in mice spleen [13], human skin equivalents [14], rabbit skin [15], a porcine model [16], and human skin [17]. Sarcoptes scabiei induced both up-regulation and down-regulation of gene expression related with immune response, inflammation, and tissue disorder both in the skin and blood of the infested Iberian ibexes, overall agreeing with previous descriptions in rabbit and human skin [15, 17]. Moreover, differences in the local skin immune response gene expression among the infested ibexes were related to differences in the systemic blood gene expression and determined the clinical outcome, agreeing with previous clinical and histopathological reports [11, 48]. As previously reported in a porcine model of crusted versus ordinary scabies [16], S. scabiei infestation promoted immune and inflammatory response in this species, both in skin and in blood, and was associated with a lower expression of genes related to cell division, such as fibroblast growth factors 5 and 23 (Supplementary material Table 1). The ibexes that recovered from mange had milder skin local and blood systemic inflammatory and immune responses, and higher cell activity in skin than the severely affected ones (Supplementary material Table 3). In addition, genes related to immunity were more expressed in the skin of the recovered ibexes than in the skin of the severely infested and the control groups. Conversely, in blood immunity-related genes were more expressed in the severely infested ibexes than in the recovered and control ones (Supplementary material Tables 2, 3, and 4).

This study further confirms that Iberian ibexes can spontaneously control S. scabiei infestation and even recover under experimental infestation conditions, agreeing with the results already reported both for free-ranging Iberian ibexes in the SNNNP [29, 45, 46] and experimentally-infested ibexes [11, 47, 48]. However, the pathogenesis of sarcoptic mange and the immune mechanisms leading to resistance against S. scabiei in Iberian ibexes are not yet fully understood.

As compared with the recovered and the control ibexes, the overall pro-inflammatory and immune response profile found in the severely infested Iberian ibexes was consistent with an ineffective immune response against the mite and with the activation of defence response against secondary bacterial infections [11, 6668]. Beyond defence against bacteria, the processes up-regulated in the severely infested ibexes included innate immune response genes, such as CD14, 2–5-oligoadenylate synthetase 1, radical S-adenosyl methionine complement component 7 lysozyme C-3-like. In humans, the clinical manifestations of severe scabies have been associated with a marked Th2 allergic immune response against the mite and its secretory products, such as salivary enzymes, eggs and faeces [69, 70]. The up-regulated gene sets associated with inflammation, cytokine production and response, mast cells and interferons found in the severely affected ibexes, agree with this link between the allergic and inflammatory responses and the lesions [8, 71]. These gene sets included interleukins 18, 19, 36, several interleukin receptors, chemokine ligand 8 and receptors 1 and 2, interferon induced transmembrane protein 3 and very large GTPase 1-like, lactotransferrin, CD14, CD163 and CD33 molecules, and tumour necrosis factor alpha-induced protein 6, among others (Supplementary material Tables 2 and 3). These results are consistent with the pro-inflammatory gene expression found in keratinocytes and fibroblasts observed both in the infested ibexes of this study and in human skin equivalents in response to S. scabiei [14].

Serum immunoglobulin concentrations have been reported to increase with mange severity in Iberian ibexes, but they seem to indicate exposition to the mite rather than having a protective effect [66, 72]. Such ineffective antibody response is paralleled by an increase in acute phase protein concentrations, an additional indicator of the inefficient inflammatory response [73, 74]. Accordingly, genes and pathways related to inflammation were up-regulated in the severely infested ibexes as compared to those that recovered, including acute-phase proteins such as serum amyloid A protein in skin and haptoglobin in blood (Supplementary material Table 2). The increased expression of genes related to immunity found in the skin of the recovered ibexes as compared to the enriched pathways of the severely infested ibexes suggests that local cellular immunity plays a significant role in controlling the extension of mange and the associated systemic inflammation. These immune-related genes include natural killer cells antigen CD94-like, mast cell protease 3-like, chemokine ligands 5, 9, 10, 11, and 22, interleukins 1, 33, and 37, among others (Supplementary material Table 2). This agrees with previous studies suggesting that the effective immune response to sarcoptic mange is cell-mediated [8, 11, 48, 75]. Particularly, the most enriched pathways in the skin of the ibexes that recovered, “Antigen processing and presentation” and “T-cell receptor signalling pathway” (Tables 5 and 6, Supplementary material Figs. 4 and 5), further suggest that the appropriate recognition of S. scabiei by the host cellular immune system is essential to control the spread of the infestation. Sarcoptic mange-related changes in immune cellular populations in skin may vary among species and clinical pictures, and include effective immune response mediated by CD4 + T cells in humans [8] or a significantly increased number of B lymphocytes in the skin of the most affected Alpine chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) [76]. Conversely, in other species like foxes (Vulpes vulpes) [77], free-living wombats (Vombatus ursinus) [78] or even in humans with crusted scabies [71], no plasma cells or B lymphocytes were found. These findings agree with the lower number of plasma cell previously reported in the skin of the infested ibexes of this study using histopathological and immunohistochemical techniques, as compared to the skin of non-infested ibexes [11, 48]. An exacerbated but effective local skin Th1-type cellular immune response involving T-lymphocytes seems key to control sarcoptic mange in Iberian ibex [48], agreeing with the higher expression of T-cell related genes, such as T-cell receptor-associated transmembrane adapter 1 and T-lymphocyte surface antigen Ly-9-like, detected in the recovered ibexes as compared to the severely infected ones (Supplementary material Table 2).

However, if the local cellular immune response fails to control the infestation in the skin, the infestation spreads. Such spread seems to overwhelm the systemic immune response, which is not capable to achieve an efficient control of mange despite the increased expression of inflammatory and immune response processes in blood, as previously reported in a porcine model [7, 16]. Sarcoptes scabei has adapted genetically to permanent parasitism [79]. For example, to avoid immune cellular recognition, S. scabiei mites stimulate the secretion of specific cytokines [80, 81] and down-regulate the gene expression of the immune response in the spleen, including the antigen-presenting cells [13] and inducing local immune suppression in the host to favour mite proliferation and the establishment of the infestation [7, 16]. This agrees with the up-regulation of cytokine production genes (Tables 4 and 5, Supplementary material Tables 2 and 3) and gene sets (Tables 6 and 7) in the blood of the severely infested. This includes, for example, the genes interleukin 18, interleukin 1, 15, and 18 receptors, tumour necrosis factor, tumour necrosis factor ligand superfamily members 9 and 13b, NFAT activating protein with ITAM motif 1, granulocyte–macrophage colony stimulating factor receptor subunits, triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (Supplementary material Table 3), and the cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, NOD-like receptor signalling pathway, toll-like receptor signalling, and complement and coagulation cascades (Table 7), when comparing with the control; and the genes natural killer cells antigen CD94-like and chemokine ligand 5 (Supplementary material Table 2) and the toll-like receptor signalling, NOD-like receptor signalling, chemokine signalling and cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction pathways (Table 6) when comparing with the recovered ibexes.

When comparing both to the control and to the recovered ibexes, additional changes in the gene expression of the severely infested ibexes corresponded with the clinical signs and skin changes associated with severe mange forms (scaling, alopecia, papules, hyperkeratosis, crusts and lichenification) [1]. Such changes included down-regulated expression of more than 40 keratin-related genes, epithelial growth factor 1, fibroblast growth factors 2 and 5, mesoderm specific transcript, trichohyalin, and cornulin, among others (Supplementary material Tables 2 and 3). Depigmentation is also observed in crusted scabies [82, 83], agreeing with the up-regulated processes related with pigmentation found in the control and recovered ibexes as compared to the severely infested ones (Tables 4 and 5). Thus, the severely infested ibexes had lower expression of genes such as premelanosome protein, melanocortin 5 receptor, melanoma-associated antigen D2, and oculocutaneous albinism II among others (Supplementary material Tables 3 and 4), all of them related to skin pigmentation. Accordingly, processes related with response to radiation were also found in the control and in the recovered ibexes (Tables 4 and 5), since pigmentation is influenced by ultraviolet radiation [84]. Depigmentation may affect ibex behaviour towards sunlight in the semiarid mountain environment of Sierra Nevada, which has a high seasonal insolation [85, 86]. The consequent bias in geographical distribution may affect the detectability of Iberian ibex for population monitoring and health surveillance, and must be taken into account for integrated wildlife monitoring [8790].

This study faces nonetheless at least two major limitations. First, gene expression was only analysed at the disease resolution stage, while studying gene expression at least at three different time points (prior to infestation, at clinical sign onset, and at disease resolution) would have allowed to understand the trend of the local and systemic gene expression responses to the experimental infestation of Iberian ibexes with S. scabiei all throughout the disease course. Secondly, the ovine gene microarrays used in this study have not been previously used nor validated in Iberian ibex, which could cause concern regarding the validity of the results obtained. However, genomic tools developed for domestic species can be a powerful tool for analysis of related species [91], and particularly DNA microarrays are reliable to study within-species gene expression for closely related species without discernible loss of information [92, 93]. Iberian ibex is closely related to small domestic ruminants, hybridizing with domestic goats [94]. Therefore, since this study focused on one-time point within species comparison, the results can be considered a significant contribution to the knowledge of the gene expression basis for sarcoptic mange pathogenesis, not only in Iberian ibex but also for other species.

Conclusions

To summarize, this study provides the first insights in the genomic response of Iberian ibex parasitized by S. scabiei. The local up-regulation of immune response pathways in the skin was related to the control of the infestation, suggesting a local effective immune response probably related with the antigen processing and presentation function and, therefore, with the activation of T-cells. Conversely, the ibexes with severe sarcoptic mange had an increased systemic inflammatory and immune response, failing to respond effectively to S. scabiei infestation. Altogether, compared with the non-infested ibexes, the infested ones had an increased expression of inflammatory and immune processes both in skin and blood, and a down-regulation of processes related with cell division, independently of the clinical outcome. This first both skin local and blood systemic assessment of the host genomic response to S. scabiei infestation will be useful not only for Iberian ibex and other wildlife species, but can also serve as a model for domestic animals and even for humans.

However, further research is required to clarify the immune mechanisms providing protection and resistance against sarcoptic mange. Such studies should include immunohistochemical and molecular analysis to elucidate the cellular and humoral immune response to sarcoptic mange, both locally in skin and systemically in peripheral blood, as well as determining both the genomic and immune responses in earlier stages of the disease, ideally before and at the peak of the infestation, to complete the information of the recovery stage generated in this study.

Supplementary Information

12864_2024_10999_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16.4KB, docx)

Supplementary Material 1. Supporting information Figure S1. Trend of the mean percentage of whole-body skin surface affected by lesions compatible with sarcoptic mange in the three experimental groups of Iberian ibexes (Capra pyrenaica), namely control, recovered, and severely infested, throughout the experiment.

12864_2024_10999_MOESM2_ESM.docx (62.2KB, docx)

Supplementary Material 2. Supporting information Figure S2. Number of differentially expressed genes among the different groups of Iberian ibexes (Capra pyrenaica) according to sarcoptic mange evolution.

12864_2024_10999_MOESM3_ESM.docx (600.3KB, docx)

Supplementary Material 3. Supporting information Figure S3a. Number of differentially enriched gene sets and percentage included in pathogenically significant processes between the infested Iberian ibexes (Capra pyrenaica) altogether and the controls. Data obtained using the GO biological process collection in the GSEA analysis (nominal p-value < 0.05 and FDR < 0.1) both in skin and blood. Supporting information Figure S3b. Number of differentially enriched gene sets and percentage included in pathogenically significant processes between the recovered ibexes and the controls. Data obtained using the GO biological process collection in the GSEA analysis (nominal p-value < 0.05 and FDR < 0.1) both in skin and blood. Supporting information Figure S3c. Number of differentially enriched gene sets and percentage included in pathogenically significant processes between the severely infested ibexes and the controls. Data obtained using the GO biological process collection in the GSEA analysis (nominal p-value < 0.05 and FDR < 0.1) both in skin and blood

12864_2024_10999_MOESM4_ESM.docx (189.4KB, docx)

Supplementary Material 4. Supporting information Figure S4. Number of differentially enriched gene sets and percentage included in pathogenically significant processes between the recovered Iberian ibexes (Capra pyrenaica) and those severely infested. Data obtained using the GO biological process collection in the GSEA analysis (nominal p-value < 0.05 and FDR < 0.1) both in skin and blood

12864_2024_10999_MOESM5_ESM.docx (16.7KB, docx)

Supplementary Material 5. Supporting information Figure S5. Differentially enriched pathways between the recovered and the severely infested Iberian ibexes (Capra pyrenaica) observed using the KEGG collection in the GSEA analysis (nominal p-value < 0.05 and FDR < 0.1) in skin and blood.

12864_2024_10999_MOESM6_ESM.docx (31.6KB, docx)

Supplementary Material 6. Supporting information Figure S6. Comparison of the pathways upregulated in the skin and blood of the Iberian ibexes (Capra pyrenaica) that tecovered and the severely infested ones as compared to the controls, using the KEGG collection in the GSEA analysis (nominal p-value < 0.05 and FDR < 0.1) in skin and blood.

12864_2024_10999_MOESM7_ESM.xlsx (15.1KB, xlsx)

Supplementary Material 7. Supporting information Table S1. Differentially expressed genes related to pathogenically significant processes between the control and the infested ibexes. The genes were considered differentially expressed for p<0.05 and log fold-change -0.58> <0.58 (absolute fold change >1.5), both for skin and blood. The gene up-regulated both in skin and blood is indicated in bold.

12864_2024_10999_MOESM8_ESM.xlsx (17.3KB, xlsx)

Supplementary Material 8. Supporting information Table S2. Differentially expressed genes related to pathogenically significant processes between the recovered and the severely infested ibexes. The genes were considered differentially expressed for p<0.05 and log fold-change -0.58> <0.58 (absolute fold change >1.5), both for skin and blood. The genes either up-regulated or down-regulated both in skin and blood are indicated in bold.

12864_2024_10999_MOESM9_ESM.xlsx (19KB, xlsx)

Supplementary Material 9. Supporting information Table S3. Differentially expressed genes related to pathogenically significant processes between the control and the severely infested ibexes. The genes were considered differentially expressed for p<0.05 and log fold-change -0.58> <0.58 (absolute fold change >1.5), both for skin and blood. The genes up-regulated both in skin and blood are indicated in bold.

12864_2024_10999_MOESM10_ESM.xlsx (13.5KB, xlsx)

Supplementary Material 10. Supporting information Table S4. Differentially expressed genes related to pathogenically significant processes between the control and the recovered ibexes. The genes were considered differentially expressed for p<0.05 and log fold-change -0.58> <0.58 (absolute fold change >1.5), both for skin and blood.

Acknowledgements

JEG and JRLO designed the study; ARB, JEG, JE, JMP, FJCM, PF and JRLO performed the experimental infestation, sampling, and curated the samples and data; LN, EP, and MB performed the genomic analyses; ARB, JE, LN, ES and RCS analysed the data; JMP, RCS and JRLO acquired funding; ARB, LN, and JRLO drafted the original version of the manuscript; JEG, EP, RCS and PF revised and supervised the manuscript; all the authors reviewed, significantly contributed to and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

JEG and JRLO designed the study; ARB, JEG, JE, JMP, FJCM, PF and JRLO performed the experimental infestation, sampling, and curated the samples and data; LN, EP, and MB performed the genomic analyses; ARB, JE, LN, ES and RCS analysed the data; JMP, RCS and JRLO acquired funding; ARB, LN, and JRLO drafted the original version of the manuscript; JEG, EP, RCS and PF revised and supervised the manuscript; all the authors reviewed, significantly contributed to and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of the Spanish Government through the research project grants CGL2012-40043-C02-01, CGL2012-40043-CO2-02 and CGL2016-80543-P. The research activities of JEG, JMP, RCS, FJCM and PF were partially funded by the Andalusian Government (PAIDI: RNM-118 group).

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study complied with all Andalusian, Spanish and European legal requirements and guidelines regarding experimentation and animal welfare. The handling procedures and sampling frequency were designed to reduce stress and minimize the impact on the health of the subjects, as per European (2010/63/UE) and Spanish (R.D 53/2013) standards. The study was approved by the Ethics on Animal Welfare Committee of the University of Jaén and authorized by the Dirección General de Producción Agrícola y Ganadera of the Consejería de Agricultura, Pesca y Medio Ambiente of the Junta de Andalucía (Ref: SA/SIS/MD/ps/ October 25, 2012). The Sierra Nevada Natural Park staff also approved this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Emmanuel Serrano, Email: Emmanuel.Serrano@uab.cat.

Jorge Ramón López-Olvera, Email: elrebeco@yahoo.es, Email: Jordi.Lopez.Olvera@uab.cat.

References

  • 1.Pence DB, Ueckermann E. Sarcoptic mange in wildlife. Rev Sci Tech OIE. 2002;21(2):385–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Engelman D, Kiang K, Chosidow O, McCarthy J, Fuller C, Lammie P, et al. Toward the global control of human scabies: introducing the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(8):e2167. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Escobar LE, Carver S, Cross PC, Rossi L, Almberg ES, Yabsley MJ, et al. Sarcoptic mange: An emerging panzootic in wildlife. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022;69(3):927–42. 10.1111/tbed.14082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Guillot J, Losson B, Delsart M, Briand A, Fang F, Rossi L. Sarcoptic mange in wild and domestic animals. In: Fischer K, Chosidow O, editors. Scabies. Cham: Springer; 2023. p. 313–43. 10.1007/978-3-031-26070-4_23
  • 5.Pisano SRR, Ryser-Degiorgis MP, Rossi L, Peano A, Keckeis K, Roosje P. Sarcoptic mange of fox origin in multiple farm animals and scabies in humans, Switzerland, 2018. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25(6):1235–8. 10.3201/eid2506.181891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rossi L, Tizzani P, Rambozzi L, Moroni B, Meneguz PG. Sanitary emergencies at the wild/domestic caprines interface in Europe. Animals. 2019;9(11):922. 10.3390/ani9110922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Browne E, Driessen MM, Cross PC, Escobar LE, Foley J, López-Olvera JR, et al. Sustaining transmission in different host species: The emblematic case of Sarcoptes scabiei. Bioscience. 2022;72(2):166–76. 10.1093/biosci/biab106. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bhat S, Mounsey K, Liu X, Walton S. Host immune responses to the itch mite, Sarcoptes scabiei, in humans. Parasite Vector. 2017;10:385. 10.1186/s13071-017-2320-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Coates SJ, Thomas C, Chang AY. Common scabies and special presentations. In: Fischer K, Chosidow O, editors. Scabies. Cham: Springer;2023. p. 207–19. 10.1007/978-3-031-26070-4_15
  • 10.Slape D, Russell R, McMeniman E. Clinical manifestations of severe scabies. In: Fischer K, Chosidow O, editors. Scabies. Cham: Springer; 2023. p. 233–68. 10.1007/978-3-031-26070-4_17
  • 11.Espinosa J, Ráez-Bravo A, López-Olvera JR, Pérez JM, Lavín S, Tvarijonaviciute A, et al. Histopathology, microbiology and the inflammatory process associated with Sarcoptes scabiei infection in the Iberian ibex. Capra pyrenaica Parasite Vector. 2017;10:596. 10.1186/s13071-017-2542-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Taylor S, Hales BJ, Thomas WR. Host immune response to scabies. In: Fischer K, Chosidow O, editors. Scabies. Cham: Springer;2023. p. 45–73. 10.1007/978-3-031-26070-4_4
  • 13.Arlian L, Fall N, Morgan M. In vivo evidence that Sarcoptes scabiei (Acari: Sarcoptidae) is the source of molecules that modulate splenic gene expression. J Med Entomol. 2007;44(6):1054–63. 10.1603/0022-2585(2007)44[1054:IVETSS]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Morgan MS, Arlian LG, Markey MP. Sarcoptes scabiei mites modulate gene expression in human skin equivalents. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8):e71143. 10.1371/journal.pone.0071143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.He R, Gu X, Lai W, Peng X, Yang G. Transcriptome-microRNA analysis of Sarcoptes scabiei and host immune response. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(5):e0177733. 10.1371/journal.pone.0177733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bhat SA, Walton SF, Ventura T, Liu X, McCarthy JS, Burgess STG, et al. Early immune suppression leads to uncontrolled mite proliferation and potent host inflammatory responses in a porcine model of crusted versus ordinary scabies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(9):e0008601. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shehwana H, Ijaz S, Fatima A, Walton S, Sheikh ZI, Haider W, et al. Transcriptome analysis of host inflammatory responses to the ectoparasitic mite Sarcoptes scabiei var. hominis. Front Immunol. 2021;12:778840. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.778840 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Galindo RC, Falconi C, López-Olvera JR, Jiménez-Clavero MA, Fernández-Pacheco P, Fernández-Pinero J, et al. Global gene expression analysis in skin biopsies of European red deer experimentally infected with bluetongue virus serotypes 1 and 8. Vet Microbiol. 2012;161:26–35. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nam GH, Mishra A, Gim JA, Lee HE, Jo A, et al. Gene expression profiles alteration after infection of virus, bacteria, and parasite in the Olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Sci Rep. 2018;8:18065. 10.1038/s41598-018-36342-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ojaimi C, Qanud K, Hintze TH, Recchia FA. Altered expression of a limited number of genes contributes to cardiac decompensation during chronic ventricular tachypacing in dogs. Physiol Genomics. 2007;29:76–83. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00159.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tao W, Mallard B. Differentially expressed genes associated with Staphylococcus aureus mastitis of Canadian Holstein cows. Vet Immunol Immunop. 2007;120:201–11. 10.1016/j.vetimm.2007.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hudson P, Rizzoli A, Grenfell B, Heesterbeek H, Dobson A. The ecology of wildlife diseases. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fernández-Morán J, Gómez S, Ballesteros F, Quirós P, Benito JL, Feliu C, et al. Epizootiology of sarcoptic mange in a population of Cantabrian chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica parva) in Northwestern Spain. Vet Parasitol. 1997;73(1–2):163–71. 10.1016/s0304-4017(97)00061-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Moroni B, Angelone S, Pérez JM, Molinar Min AR, Pasquetti M, Tizzani P, et al. Sarcoptic mange in wild ruminants in Spain: solving the epidemiological enigma using microsatellite markers. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14(1):171. 10.1186/s13071-021-04673-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rossi L, Fraquelli C, Vesco U, Permunian R, Sommavilla G, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of a scabies epidemic in chamois in the Dolomite Alps. Italy Eur J Wildlife Res. 2007;53:131–41. 10.1007/s10344-006-0067-x. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.León-Vizcaíno L, Ruíz de Ybáñez MR, Cubero MJ, Ortíz JM, Espinosa J, Pérez L, et al. Sarcoptic mange in Spanish ibex from Spain. J Wildl Dis. 1999;35(4):647–59. 10.7589/0090-3558-35.4.647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ondersheka K, Kutzer E, Richter HE. Die raude der gemse und ihre bekampfung. Z Jagdwiss. 1968;14:12–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schaschl LF. Gamsräude. Wien: Österreichischer Jagd- und Fischereiverlag; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Valldeperes M, Prieto Yerro P, López-Olvera JR, Fandos P, Lavín S, Escofet RCS, et al. Diseases of Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica). Eur J Wildl Res. 2023;69(3):63. 10.1007/s10344-023-01684-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.González-Candela M, León-Vizcaíno L, Cubero-Pablo MJ. Population effects of sarcoptic mange in Barbary sheep (Ammotragus lervia) from Sierra Espuña Regional Park. Spain J Wildl Dis. 2004;40:456–65. 10.7589/0090-3558-40.3.456s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.León-Vizcaíno L, Astorga R, Escós J, Alonso F, Alados C, Contreras A, et al. Epidemiología de la sarna sarcóptica en el Parque Natural de las Sierras de Cazorla, Segura y Las Villas. In: Proceedings of the International Congress on the Genus Capra in Europe. Junta Rectora del Parque Natural Sierra de las Nieves, Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla; 1992. P. 95–9.
  • 32.Oleaga Á, Balseiro A, Gortázar C. Sarcoptic mange in two roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) from northern Spain. Eur J Wildl Res. 2008;54:134–7. 10.1007/s10344-007-0105-3. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Oleaga Á, Casais R, González-Quirós P, Prieto M, Gortázar C. Sarcoptic mange in red deer from Spain: improved surveillance or disease emergence? Vet Parasitol. 2008;154:103–13. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Haas C, Origgi FC, Rossi S, López-Olvera JR, Rossi L, Castillo-Contreras R, et al. Serological survey in wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Switzerland and other European countries: Sarcoptes scabiei may be more widely distributed than previously thought. BMC Vet Res. 2018;14:117. 10.1186/s12917-018-1430-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Valldeperes M, Moroni B, Rossi L, López-Olvera JR, Velarde R, Molinar Min AR, et al. First report of interspecific transmission of sarcoptic mange from Iberian ibex to wild boar. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14(1):481. 10.1186/s13071-021-04979-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bornstein S, Mörner T, Samuel WM. Sarcoptes scabiei and sarcoptic mange. In: Samuel WM, Pybus MJ, Kocan AA, editors. Parasitic diseases of wild mammals, 2nd ed. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag; 2001. p. 107–19. 10.1007/978-3-540-48996-2_2803
  • 37.DeCandia AL, Schrom EC, Brandell EE, Stahler DR, vonHoldt BM. Sarcoptic mange severity is associated with reduced genomic variation and evidence of selection in Yellowstone National Park wolves (Canis lupus). Evol Appl. 2020;14(2):429–45. 10.1111/eva.13127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fandos P, Arcenegui P, Lora MA, Burón D, Granados JE, Cadenas R. Evolución demográfica de la cabra montés en Andalucía en los últimos 100 años. Galemys. 2010;22:347–58. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Granados JE, Pérez JM, Soriguer RC, Fandos P, Ruiz-Martínez I. On the biometry of the Spanish ibex, Capra pyrenaica, from Sierra Nevada (Southern Spain). Folia Zool. 1997;46(1):9–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pérez JM, Granados JE, Espinosa J, Ráez-Bravo A, López-Olvera JR, Rossi L, et al. Biology and management of sarcoptic mange in wild Caprinae populations. Mamm Rev. 2021;51(1):82–94. 10.1111/mam.12213. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Arenas AJ, Gómez F, Salas R, Carrasco P, Borge C, Maldonado A, et al. An evaluation of the application of infrared thermal imaging to the tele-diagnosis of sarcoptic mange in the Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica). Vet Parasitol. 2002;109:111–7. 10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00248-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.La FP. cabra montés (Capra pyrenaica) en el Parque Natural de las Sierras de Cazorla, Segura y Las Villas. Madrid: Icona-CSIC Colección Técnica; 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pérez J, Ruiz-Martínez I, Granados JE, Soriguer RC, Fandos P. The dynamics of sarcoptic mange in the ibex population of Sierra Nevada in Spain - Influence of climatic factors. J Wildl Res. 1997;2(1):86–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Valldeperes M, Granados JE, Mentaberre G, Prieto P, Escribano F, Cardells J, et al. Serological survey of sarcoptic mange in Mediterranean Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica) populations. Abstracts Book of the 13th Conference of the European Wildlife Disease Association. Larissa (Greece), 27th-31st August, 2018. p. 117.
  • 45.Alasaad S, Granados JE, Fandos P, Cano-Manuel FJ, Soriguer RC, Pérez JM. The use of radio-collars for monitoring wildlife diseases: a case study from Iberian ibex affected by Sarcoptes scabiei in Sierra Nevada. Spain Parasite Vector. 2013;6:242. 10.1186/1756-3305-6-242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pérez JM, López-Montoya AJ, Cano-Manuel FJ, Soriguer RC, Fandos P, Granados JE. Development of resistance to sarcoptic mange in ibex. J Wildl Manag. 2022;86:1–16. 10.1002/jwmg.22224. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Castro I, Espinosa J, Granados JE, Cano-Manuel FJ, Fandos P, Ráez-Bravo A, et al. Characterizing the growth of Sarcoptes scabiei infrapopulations. Exp Appl Acarol. 2018;76:41–52. 10.1007/s10493-018-0287-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Valldeperes M, Granados JE, Pérez V, López-Olvera JR, Ráez-Bravo A, Fandos P, et al. The local skin cellular immune response determines the clinical outcome of sarcoptic mange in Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica). Front Vet Sci. 2023;10:1183304. 10.3389/fvets.2023.1183304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Espinosa J, López-Olvera JR, Cano-Manuel FJ, Fandos P, Pérez JM, López-Graells C, et al. Guidelines for managing captive Iberian ibex herds for conservation purposes. J Nat Conserv. 2017;40:24–32. 10.1016/j.jnc.2017.09.002. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pérez JM, Granados JE, Sarasa M, Serrano E. Usefulness of estimated surface area of damaged skin as a proxy of mite load in the monitoring of sarcoptic mange in free-ranging populations of Iberian wild goat. Capra pyrenaica Vet Parasitol. 2011;176(2–3):258–64. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sarasa M, Rambozzi L, Rossi L, Meneguz PG, Serrano E, Granados JE, et al. Sarcoptes scabiei: Specific immune response to sarcoptic mange in the Iberian ibex Capra pyrenaica depends on previous exposure and sex. Exp Parasitol. 2010;124(3):265–71. 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Carvalho J, Granados JE, López-Olvera JR, Cano-Manuel FJ, Pérez JM, Fandos P, et al. Sarcoptic mange breaks up bottom-up regulation of body condition in a large herbivore population. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:572. 10.1186/s13071-015-1188-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.López-Olvera JR, Serrano E, Armenteros A, Pérez JM, Fandos P, Carvalho J, et al. Sex-biased severity of sarcoptic mange at the same biological cost in a sexually dimorphic ungulate. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Valldeperes M, Granados JE, Pérez JM, Castro I, Ráez-Bravo A, Fandos P, et al. How sensitive and specific is the visual diagnosis of sarcoptic mange in free-ranging Iberian ibexes? Parasites Vectors. 2019;12:405. 10.1186/s13071-019-3665-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Casas-Díaz E, Marco I, López-Olvera JR, Mentaberre G, Lavín S. Comparison of xylazine–ketamine and medetomidine–ketamine anaesthesia in the Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica). Eur J Wildlife Res. 2011;57(4):887–93. 10.1007/s10344-011-0500-7. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, Scherf U, et al. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics. 2003;4(2):249–64. 10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bengtsson H, Irizarry R, Carvalho B, Speed TP. Estimation and assessment of raw copy numbers at the single locus level. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(6):759–67. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.R Development Core Team 2018. R software version 3.5.0. www.r-project.com
  • 59.Gentleman R, Carey J, Bates D, Bolstad B, Dettling M, et al. Bioconductor: Open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 2004;5(10):R80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(7): e47. 10.1093/nar/gkv007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Leek JT, Johnson WE, Parker HS, Fertig EJ, Jaffe AE, et al. sva: Surrogate Variable Analysis. R package version 3.26.0; 2017.
  • 62.McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. Testing significance relative to a fold-change threshold is a TREAT. 2009. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(6):765–71. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Dalman MR, Deeter A, Nimishakavi G, Duan ZH. Fold change and p-value cutoffs significantly alter microarray interpretations. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012;13(Suppl 2):S11. 10.1186/1471-2105-13-S2-S11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Erikson KF, Subramanian A, Sihag S, et al. PGC-1α-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat Genet. 2003;34:267–73. 10.1038/ng1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. PNAS. 2005;102(43):15545–50. 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lastras ME, Pastor J, Marco I, Ruiz M, Viñas L, Lavín S. Effects of sarcoptic mange on serum proteins and immunoglobulin G levels in chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica) and Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica). Vet Parasitol. 2000;88:313–9. 10.1016/s0304-4017(99)00221-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Nakagawa TLDR, Takai Y, Kubo M, Sakai H, Masegi T, Yanai T. A pathological study of sepsis associated with sarcoptic mange in raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in Japan. J Comp Pathol. 2009;141(2–3):177–81. 10.1016/j.jcpa.2009.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Swe PM, Zakrzewski M, Kelly A, Krause L, Fischer K. Scabies mites alter the skin microbiome and promote growth of opportunistic pathogens in a porcine model. PLoS Neglect Trop D. 2014;8(5):e2897. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Mounsey KE, Murray HC, Bielefeldt-Ohmann H, Pasay C, Holt DC, Currie BJ, et al. Prospective study in a porcine model of Sarcoptes scabiei indicates the association of Th2 and Th17 pathways with the clinical severity of scabies. PLoS Neglect Trop D. 2015;9(3):e0003498. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Walton SF, Pizzutto S, Slender A, Viberg L, Holt D, Hales BJ, et al. Increased allergic immune response to Sarcoptes scabiei antigens in crusted versus ordinary scabies. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010;17(9):1428–38. 10.1128/CVI.00195-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Walton SF, Beroukas D, Roberts-Thomson P, Currie BJ. New insights into disease pathogenesis in crusted (Norwegian) scabies: the skin immune response in crusted scabies. Brit J Dermatol. 2008;158(6):1247–55. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08541.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ráez-Bravo A, Granados JE, Serrano E, Dellamaria D, Casais R, et al. Evaluation of three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for sarcoptic mange diagnosis and assessment in the Iberian ibex. Capra pyrenaica Parasite Vector. 2016;9:558. 10.1186/s13071-016-1843-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ráez-Bravo A, Granados JE, Cerón JJ, Cano-Manuel FJ, Fandos P, Pérez JM, et al. Acute phase proteins increase with sarcoptic mange status and severity in Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica Schinz, 1838). Parasitol Res. 2015;114:4005–10. 10.1007/s00436-015-4628-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Pastor J, Bach E, Ráez-Bravo A, López-Olvera JR, Tvarijonaviciute A, Granados JE, et al. Method validation, reference values, and characterization of acute-phase protein responses to experimentally induced inflammation and bluetongue virus infection in the Iberian ibex. Vet Clin Pathol. 2019;48(4):695–701. 10.1111/vcp.12802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Arlian LG, Morgan MS, Vyszenskimoher DL, Stemmer BL. Sarcoptes scabiei: the circulating antibody response and induced immunity to scabies. Exp Parasitol. 1994;78:37–50. 10.1006/expr.1994.1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Salvadori C, Rocchigiani G, Lazzarotti C, Formenti N, Trogu T, et al. Histological lesions and cellular response in the skin of alpine chamois (Rupicapra r. rupicapra) spontaneously affected by sarcoptic mange. BioMed Res Int. 2016;2016:3575468. 10.1155/2016/3575468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Nimmervoll H, Hoby S, Robert N, Lommano E, Welle M, Ryser-Degiorgis M. Pathology of sarcoptic mange in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes): macroscopic and histologic characterization of three disease stages. J Wildl Dis. 2013;49(1):91–102. 10.7589/2010-11-316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Skerratt LF. Cellular response in the dermis of common wombats (Vombatus ursinus) infected with Sarcoptes scabiei var. wombati. J Wildl Dis. 2003;39(1):193–202. 10.7589/0090-3558-39.1.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Xu J, Wang Q, Wang S, Huang W, Xie Y, Gu X, et al. Comparative genomics of Sarcoptes scabiei provide new insights into adaptation to permanent parasitism and within-host species divergence. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022;69(6):3468–84. 10.1111/tbed.14706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Arlian LG, Morgan MS, Paul CC. Evidence that scabies mites (Acari: Sarcoptidae) influence production of interleukin-10 and the function of T-regulatory cells (Tr1) in humans. J Med Entomol. 2006;43(2):283–7. 10.1603/0022-2585(2006)043[0283:etsmas]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lalli PN, Morgan MS, Arlian LG. Skewed Th1 / Th2 immune response to Sarcoptes scabiei. J Parasitol. 2004;90(4):711–4. 10.1645/GE-214R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Mounsey KE, McCarthy JS, Walton SF. Scratching the itch: new tools to advance understanding of scabies. Trends Parasitol. 2013;29(1):35–42. 10.1016/j.pt.2012.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Yamaguchi Y, Brenner M, Hearing VJ. The regulation of skin pigmentation. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(38):27557–61. 10.1074/jbc.R700026200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Slominski A, Pawelek J. Animals under the sun: effects of ultraviolet radiation on mammalian skin. Clin Dermatol. 1998;16:503–15. 10.1016/S0738-081X(98)00023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Caro T. The adaptive significance of coloration in mammals. Bioscience. 2005;55(2):125–36. 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0125:TASOCI]2.0.CO;2. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Oliva M, Fernández-Fernández JM, Martín-Díaz J. The geographic uniqueness of the Sierra Nevada in the context of the mid-latitude Mountains. In: Zamora R, Oliva M, editors. The landscape of the Sierra Nevada. Cham: Springer; 2022. P. 3–9. 10.1007/978-3-030-94219-9_1
  • 87.Granados JE, Ros-Candeira A, Pérez-Luque AJ, Moreno-Llorca R, Cano-Manuel FJ, Fandos P, et al. Long-term monitoring of the Iberian ibex population in the Sierra Nevada of the southeast Iberian Peninsula. Sci Data. 2020;7:203. 10.1038/s41597-020-0544-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Barroso P, Relimpio D, Zearra JA, Cerón JJ, Palencia P, Cardoso B, et al. Using integrated wildlife monitoring to prevent future pandemics through one health approach. One Health. 2023;16: 100479. 10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Barroso P, López-Olvera JR, Kiluba wa Kiluba T, Gortázar C. Overcoming the limitations of wildlife disease monitoringOne Health. Res Directions One Health. 2024;2(e3):1–14. 10.1017/one.2023.16. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Peña-Carmona G, Escobar-González M, Dobbins MT, Conejero C, Valldeperes M, Lavín S, et al. Direct counts underestimate mountain ungulate population size. Eur J Wildl Res. 2024;pre-print under review. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4009600/v1
  • 91.Kharzinova VR, Sermyagin AA, Gladyr EA, Okhlopkov IM, Brem G, Zinovieva NA. A study of applicability of SNP chips developed for bovine and ovine species to whole-genome analysis of reindeer Rangifer tarandus. J Hered. 2015;106(6):758–61. 10.1093/jhered/esv081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Oshlack A, Chabot AE, Smyth GK, Gilad Y. Using DNA microarrays to study gene expression in closely related species. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(10):1235–42. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Mantione KJ, Kream RM, Kuzelova H, Ptacek R, Raboch J, Samuel JM, et al. Comparing bioinformatic gene expression profiling methods: microarray and RNA-Seq. Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2014;20:138–42. 10.12659/MSMBR.892101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Figuereido-Cardoso T, Luigi-Sierra MG, Castelló A, Cabrera B, Noce A, Mármol-Sánchez E, et al. Assessing the levels of intraspecific admixture and interspecific hybridization in Iberian wild goats (Capra pyrenaica). Evol Appl. 2021;14(11):2618–34. 10.1111/eva.13299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

12864_2024_10999_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16.4KB, docx)

Supplementary Material 1. Supporting information Figure S1. Trend of the mean percentage of whole-body skin surface affected by lesions compatible with sarcoptic mange in the three experimental groups of Iberian ibexes (Capra pyrenaica), namely control, recovered, and severely infested, throughout the experiment.

12864_2024_10999_MOESM2_ESM.docx (62.2KB, docx)

Supplementary Material 2. Supporting information Figure S2. Number of differentially expressed genes among the different groups of Iberian ibexes (Capra pyrenaica) according to sarcoptic mange evolution.

12864_2024_10999_MOESM3_ESM.docx (600.3KB, docx)

Supplementary Material 3. Supporting information Figure S3a. Number of differentially enriched gene sets and percentage included in pathogenically significant processes between the infested Iberian ibexes (Capra pyrenaica) altogether and the controls. Data obtained using the GO biological process collection in the GSEA analysis (nominal p-value < 0.05 and FDR < 0.1) both in skin and blood. Supporting information Figure S3b. Number of differentially enriched gene sets and percentage included in pathogenically significant processes between the recovered ibexes and the controls. Data obtained using the GO biological process collection in the GSEA analysis (nominal p-value < 0.05 and FDR < 0.1) both in skin and blood. Supporting information Figure S3c. Number of differentially enriched gene sets and percentage included in pathogenically significant processes between the severely infested ibexes and the controls. Data obtained using the GO biological process collection in the GSEA analysis (nominal p-value < 0.05 and FDR < 0.1) both in skin and blood

12864_2024_10999_MOESM4_ESM.docx (189.4KB, docx)

Supplementary Material 4. Supporting information Figure S4. Number of differentially enriched gene sets and percentage included in pathogenically significant processes between the recovered Iberian ibexes (Capra pyrenaica) and those severely infested. Data obtained using the GO biological process collection in the GSEA analysis (nominal p-value < 0.05 and FDR < 0.1) both in skin and blood

12864_2024_10999_MOESM5_ESM.docx (16.7KB, docx)

Supplementary Material 5. Supporting information Figure S5. Differentially enriched pathways between the recovered and the severely infested Iberian ibexes (Capra pyrenaica) observed using the KEGG collection in the GSEA analysis (nominal p-value < 0.05 and FDR < 0.1) in skin and blood.

12864_2024_10999_MOESM6_ESM.docx (31.6KB, docx)

Supplementary Material 6. Supporting information Figure S6. Comparison of the pathways upregulated in the skin and blood of the Iberian ibexes (Capra pyrenaica) that tecovered and the severely infested ones as compared to the controls, using the KEGG collection in the GSEA analysis (nominal p-value < 0.05 and FDR < 0.1) in skin and blood.

12864_2024_10999_MOESM7_ESM.xlsx (15.1KB, xlsx)

Supplementary Material 7. Supporting information Table S1. Differentially expressed genes related to pathogenically significant processes between the control and the infested ibexes. The genes were considered differentially expressed for p<0.05 and log fold-change -0.58> <0.58 (absolute fold change >1.5), both for skin and blood. The gene up-regulated both in skin and blood is indicated in bold.

12864_2024_10999_MOESM8_ESM.xlsx (17.3KB, xlsx)

Supplementary Material 8. Supporting information Table S2. Differentially expressed genes related to pathogenically significant processes between the recovered and the severely infested ibexes. The genes were considered differentially expressed for p<0.05 and log fold-change -0.58> <0.58 (absolute fold change >1.5), both for skin and blood. The genes either up-regulated or down-regulated both in skin and blood are indicated in bold.

12864_2024_10999_MOESM9_ESM.xlsx (19KB, xlsx)

Supplementary Material 9. Supporting information Table S3. Differentially expressed genes related to pathogenically significant processes between the control and the severely infested ibexes. The genes were considered differentially expressed for p<0.05 and log fold-change -0.58> <0.58 (absolute fold change >1.5), both for skin and blood. The genes up-regulated both in skin and blood are indicated in bold.

12864_2024_10999_MOESM10_ESM.xlsx (13.5KB, xlsx)

Supplementary Material 10. Supporting information Table S4. Differentially expressed genes related to pathogenically significant processes between the control and the recovered ibexes. The genes were considered differentially expressed for p<0.05 and log fold-change -0.58> <0.58 (absolute fold change >1.5), both for skin and blood.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.


Articles from BMC Genomics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES