Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2024 Nov 14:2024.10.16.618724. [Version 2] doi: 10.1101/2024.10.16.618724

Blood cultures contain populations of genetically diverse Candida albicans strains that may differ in echinocandin tolerance and virulence

Giuseppe Fleres 1, Shaoji Cheng 1, Hassan Badrane 1, Christopher L Dupont 2, Josh L Espinoza 2, Darren Abbey 3, Eileen Driscoll 1, Anthony Newbrough 1, Binghua Hao 1, Akila Mansour 4, M Hong Nguyen 1,4,#,*, Cornelius J Clancy 1,5,*
PMCID: PMC11601265  PMID: 39605648

Abstract

It is unknown whether within-patient Candida albicans diversity is common during bloodstream infections (BSIs). We determined whole genome sequences of 10 C. albicans strains from blood cultures (BCs) in each of 4 patients. BCs in 3 patients contained mixed populations of strains that differed by large-scale genetic variants, including chromosome (Chr) 5 or 7 aneuploidy (n=2) and Chr1 loss of heterozygosity (n=1). Chr7 trisomy (Tri7) strains from patient MN were attenuated for hyphal and biofilm formation in vitro compared to euploid strains, due at least in part to NRG1 over-expression. Nevertheless, representative Tri7 strain M1 underwent filamentation during disseminated candidiasis (DC) in mice. M1 was more fit than euploid strain M2 during DC and mouse gastrointestinal colonization, and in blood ex vivo. M1 and M2 exhibited identical echinocandin minimum inhibitory concentrations, but M2 was more tolerant to micafungin in vitro. Furthermore, M2 was more competitive with M1 in mouse kidneys following micafungin treatment than it was in absence of micafungin. Tri7 strains represented 74% of patient MN’s baseline BC population, but after 1d and 3d of echinocandin treatment, euploid strains were 93% and 98% of the BC population, respectively. Findings suggest that echinocandin tolerant, euploid strains were a subpopulation to more virulent Tri7 strains at baseline and then were selected upon echinocandin exposure. In conclusion, BCs in at least some patients are comprised of diverse C. albicans populations not recognized by the clinical lab, rather than single strains. Clinical relevance of C. albicans diversity and antifungal tolerance merits further investigation.

Keywords: Candida albicans, Bloodstream infections, Genetic diversity, Echinocandin tolerance, Aneuploidy, Chromosome 7 trisomy

Introduction.

Clinical strains of Candida spp. from sites of mucosal colonization and longitudinal Candida strains from sites of invasive disease often demonstrate within-host genetic and phenotypic diversity.1,2,36 4,5,7 The long-standing paradigm is that most fungal or bacterial sterile site infections reflect proliferation of a single, genetically identical strain that passes through a bottleneck (“single organism” hypothesis).810 In recent studies, however, we and others have shown that blood cultures (BCs) from patients with Staphylococcus aureus, carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) or Candida glabrata bloodstream infections (BSIs) can be comprised of genetically and phenotypically diverse strains, including strains unrecognized by the clinical laboratory that differ in antimicrobial susceptibility.1113 Within-patient C. glabrata strains differed by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and, to a lesser extent, insertions-deletions (indels), gene copy number variations, presence/absence of specific genes and chromosomal rearrangements.

C. albicans is the most intrinsically virulent Candida sp. and the leading cause of candidemia globally.14 C. albicans differs from C. glabrata in having a diploid, rather than haploid genome. In this study, we determined whether contemporaneous C. albicans strains from positive BCs of patients with BSIs were genetically and phenotypically distinct, and we compared diversity of strains from longitudinal BCs of patients with persistent BSIs.

Results.

Genetic diversity of C. albicans strains.

We performed whole genome sequencing (WGSing; Illumina NextSeq) on 10 strains from individual colonies in each of 4 patients [Supplemental Table 1]. For patient G, 10 strains were sequenced from the baseline (day (d)-0) BC, including the index strain from the clinical laboratory and a strain from each of 9 randomly-selected colonies. For other patients, index and 4 randomly-selected strains were sequenced from both baseline and last positive BCs (collected 3d (patient AB), 12 d (QR) and 13 d (MN) after baseline). Strains had 8 pairs of chromosomes and 14.24–14.82 Mbp genomes. On average, 98% of reads aligned to the reference C. albicans SC5314 genome (range: 96%-99%). Strains clustered by patient upon SNP phylogenetic analysis [Figure 1]. Within-patient strains differed by 0–7 (AB), 7–42 (G), 3–36 (MN) and 8–28 (QR) SNPs [Supplemental Table 2]. Within 3 patients, strains also differed by 1–8 (G), 0–9 (MN) and 1–6 (QR) indels.

Figure 1. Core genome single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) phylogeny of Candida albicans strains from patients with bloodstream infections.

Figure 1.

Ten strains from each of 4 patients (AB (magenta), MN (blue), QR (yellow) and G (green) underwent whole genome sequencing. The phylogenetic tree was built using RaxML under the general time-reversible model with 1,000-bootstrap replicates. Within-patient strains had the following ranges of SNP differences: patient AB (range, 0–7); patient MN (range, 3– 36); patient QR (range, 8–28); patient G (range, 7–42). Nodes grouping by clade and patient had 100% bootstrap support values.

Large-scale, within-patient genetic differences among strains were observed in 3 of 4 patients (G, MN, QR) [Figure 2. Within 2 patients (G, MN), strains differed by whole chromosome aneuploidies. In patient G, index strain G1 exhibited trisomy of chromosome (Chr) 5 (Tri5); other strains were euploid [Figure 2A]. In patient MN, 4 of 5 strains from the baseline BC (index strain M1, M3-M5) exhibited trisomy of Chr7 (Tri7); 1 of 5 strains from baseline (M2) and all 5 strains from d13 BCs (index strain N1, N2-N5) were euploid [Figure 2B]. Ploidy was confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) [Supplemental Table 3; Supplemental Figure 1].12,15 In patient QR, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of Chr1 was detected in 7 of 10 strains, including 2 of 5 baseline (index strain Q1 and Q2) and all 5 d12 (index strain R1, R2-R5) strains [Figure 2C]. R1-R5 also had segmental LOH of Chr7, which was not present in Q1-Q5. Within-patient AB strains did not show large-scale genetic variations.

Figure 2. Copy number variants (CNVs), single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) density and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in Candida albicans strains from patients with bloodstream infections.

Figure 2.

Strains from patients G, MN and QR are shown in Figures A through C, respectively. Chromosomes are arranged along the horizontal (x) axis. The vertical (y) axis represents sequence read depth, scaled to actual copy number. CNVs are presented as black lines drawn upwards or downwards from the mid-line of the chromosome. Regions with CNV are highlighted in green. Regions of SNP density are presented as shades of grey, and homozygous regions are white. Regions of LOH are red. Black circles along the bottom of chromosomes represent major repeat sequences (MRSs). A. Strain G1 differed from other G strains by having an extra copy of whole Chr5 (i.e., trisomy 5), as evident by a block of black lines extending upward from the mid-line (green highlight). Strains did not differ by SNP density or LOH. B. Strains M1, M3, M4 and M5 differed from other MN strains by having an extra copy of whole Chr7 (i.e., trisomy 7). All MN strains had an extra copy of a small region adjacent to the second MRS of Chr7 (green highlight). Strains did not differ by SNP density or LOH. C. Strains Q1, Q2 and R1-R5 had a region of LOH (red highlight) in a segment at the end of the left arm of chromosome 1, which was not apparent in strains Q3-Q5. As indicated by grey highlight, the latter strains did not have gaps in SNP density in the region of LOH. A small potential region of LOH was also present uniquely in strains R1-R5, demarcated by a single red line near the middle of the left arm of Chr7; the size of this region was at or very near the resolution limit for YMAP analysis (4.5 Kb). QR strains did not differ by CNV or ploidy. The only differences among strains in SNP density was in the region of LOH.

Screening phenotypes of C. albicans strains.

All 40 strains were susceptible to echinocandins and azoles. Within-patient minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were within 2-fold. Strains from patients AB and QR formed normal hyphae in liquid media (YPD with 10% fetal bovine serum, RPMI1640 with 2% glucose, Spider; 37°C) and on solid agar (RPMI1640 with 2% glucose, Spider, M199; 30°C). Strains from patient G were impaired in hyphal formation in liquid media and on solid agar [Supplemental Figure 2]. Strains from patient MN formed normal hyphae in liquid media. On solid agar, however, all 4 Tri7 strains (baseline strains M1, M3-M5) were impaired in hyphal formation, whereas all 6 euploid strains (baseline M2 and d13 N1-N5) formed robust hyphae [Figure 3]. Tri7 strains also produced <30% of biofilm that was generated by euploid strains, as measured by crystal violet assay [Figure 4; p-values< 0.0001].

Figure 3. Hyphal formation by MN strains on solid agar.

Figure 3.

Strains were photographed after incubation on RPMI 1640 with 2% glucose medium at 30°C for 5 days. Euploid strains (M2, N1, N2, N3, N4 and N5) formed extensive hyphae, whereas trisomy 7 strains M1, M3, M4 and M5 did not.

Figure 4. Biofilm formation by MN strains.

Figure 4.

Biofilm formation by MN strains at 37°C in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 2% (w/v) glucose was measured by a 0.1% aqueous crystal violet assay in flat bottom wells as optical density at 590 nm (OD590). Data are presented as mean ± SEM of ratio of OD590 for a given strain relative to that of euploid strain M2 (3 independent experiments). Tri7 (M1, M3, M4 and M5) and euploid (M2, N1-N5) strains are represented by striped and solid grey bar graphs, respectively. Tri7 strains consistently produced < 30% of biofilm produced by euploid strains (mean ± SEM ratio: 0.17±0.01 vs. 0.99±0.04; ****p<0.0001, Mann-Whitney test). Tri7 strains did not differ significantly from one another in biofilm formation, nor did euploid strains significantly differ among themselves.

Phenotypic diversity of C. albicans strains from patient MN.

We chose strains from patient MN for more in-depth phenotypic assays because they demonstrated genetic differences that correlated with differences in hyphal and biofilm formation, and serial positive BCs over 13d were available for study. The timeline of C. albicans-positive BCs and antifungal treatment is shown in Supplemental Figure 3.

Micafungin responsiveness.

We first tested serial ten-fold dilutions of each strain for responsiveness to micafungin and other stress-inducing agents in dot-blot assays. Tri7 strains (M1, M3, M4, M5) were more susceptible to Congo red (200 μg/mL), sodium dodecyl sulfate (0.04%) and micafungin (0.03 μg/mL) at 30°C and 39°C than were euploid strains [Figure 5A]. There were no significant differences among strains in presence of fluconazole (1 μg/mL), methyl methane sulfonate (0.02%), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 2.5mM), sodium chloride (1M) or caffeine (10 mg/mL).

Figure 5. Susceptibility of MN strains to cell wall-active agents and tolerance to micafungin.

Figure 5.

A. In susceptibility experiments, serial 10-fold dilutions starting at 1×106 CFU/mL of trisomy7 and euploid strains were spotted at exponential growth onto Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA, control) and SDA containing Congo red (200μg/mL), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, 0.04%) or micafungin (0.03 μg/mL). Plates were incubated at 30°C or 39°C for 3d. Images are shown for representative trisomy7 (M1, M3) and euploid (M2, N1) strains on d3 at 39°C. Phenotypes were similar at 30°C. B. Micafungin tolerance was first assessed using a disk diffusion assay to measure fraction of growth (FoG). A filter disc inoculated with 5 μg of micafungin was placed in the middle of a casitone agar place saturated with C. albicans strains. Tolerance was determined at 48h growth at 35°C. FoG was defined as growth within the region of inhibition relative to the maximum growth. FoG was calculated by diskImageR and image J at 80%, 50% and 20% relative inhibition (FOG80, FOG50 and FOG20, respectively). Data shown are mean ± standard error of means of FoG values for Tri7 and euploid strains. P-values were determined by student’s t test with Welsh correction (* denotes p <0.05 and ** p<0.01). C. Micafungin tolerance was also assessed using a broth microdilution assay to measure supra-MIC growth (SMG, defined as the proportion of average of growth at 48h in wells with drug concentration above the MIC relative to the growth of no drug control wells). SMG data (OD600 at 48h) are presented as mean ± standard error of euploid and Tri7 strains on a bar graph (top) and as a heat map (bottom). Heat map scale is shown on the bottom right.

We next evaluated MN strains for micafungin tolerance (enhanced growth in presence of drug compared to control, without changes in MIC) using disk diffusion (fraction of growth (FoG)) and liquid microdilution (supra-MIC growth (SMG)) assays.16,17 FoG of euploid strains within zones of 80%, 50% and 20% inhibition by micafungin (FoG80, FoG50, FoG20) were higher than those of Tri7 strains (p=0.05, 0.03 and 0.008, respectively) [Figure 5B]. Likewise, mean SMG (average growth within micafungin-containing wells above MIC50/growth in absence of micafungin) of euploid strains was higher than that of Tri7 strains (p=0.0003) [Figure 5C]. Therefore, euploid strains were more tolerant than Tri7 strains to micafungin by both FoG and SMG.

NRG1 dose effect.

Decreased filamentation of some C. albicans Tri7 strains has been linked to dose-dependent expression of Chr7 gene NRG1, which encodes a negative regulator of certain hyphal genes.15 We demonstrated by qRT-PCR that NRG1 expression by Tri7 strain M1 was ~1.5 fold higher than that by euploid strains [Supplemental Figure 4A]. 18 We created NRG1 over-expression strains in euploid M2 and N1 backgrounds (strains M2-Nrg1OE and N1-Nrg1OE, respectively). NRG1 expression by M2-Nrg1OE and N1-Nrg1OE was ~1.8-fold and ~1.6-fold higher than by the respective euploid parent strains (p=0.001) [Supplemental Figure 4A]. Over-expression strains had reduced hyphal and biofilm formation compared to euploid parent strains (biofilm p-values <0.0001) [Supplemental Table 3; Supplemental Figures 4BC].

Competitive growth in vitro and in blood ex vivo.

Since Tri7 and euploid strains comprised a mixed population within patient MN’s baseline BC, we studied competitive fitness of bar-coded Tri7 strain M1 and bar-coded euploid strain M2 under various conditions. Bar-coded strains did not differ from respective parent strains during growth in YPD media or by echinocandin MICs or in hyphal and biofilm formation.

We conducted competitive growth assays (1:1 ratio, 1×104 colony forming units (CFUs)/mL each) in liquid YPD media at 39°C in presence or absence of H2O2 (1 mM) or micafungin (0.125 μg/mL).15 There were no significant differences in competitive fitness between strains over 3, 6 or 9d in YPD alone or in presence of H2O2, as determined by bar code sequencing [Figure 6A]. Strain M2 was more fit than M1 at each time point in the presence of micafungin (p <0.0001), consistent with FoG and SMG tolerance data. During ex vivo competitive assays in fresh blood from a healthy volunteer at 37°C (1×104 CFUs)/mL each), M1 was significantly more fit than M2 over 1, 3 and 7d [Figure 6B].

Figure 6. Competitive fitness of trisomy 7 strain M1 and euploid strain M2 in vitro and ex vivo.

Figure 6.

Barcoded strains M1 and M2 were mixed 1:1 in all experiments; input ratios were confirmed by colony forming unit determinations. At given timepoints, competitive indices (fraction of total population) of M1 and M2 were determined by barcode sequencing. Data are presented as mean ± SEM competitive indices for each strain from 3 independent experiments. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001 A. In vitro. Barcoded M1 and M2 were co-cultured in yeast peptone dextrose (YPD) medium at 39°C with or without H2O2 (1 mM) or micafungin (0.125 μg/mL) for 3, 6 and 9d. Strains did not differ in fitness in YPD alone or in presence of H2O2. M1 was significantly more fit than M2 at each time point in presence of micafungin (p< 0.0001; unpaired student’s t test). B. Ex vivo. Strains were co-incubated in blood from a healthy human volunteer at 37°C. Fractions of each strain out of the total population were assessed at d1, d3 and d7. Strain M1 was significantly more fit than M2 at each time point. P-values were calculated using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons against inoculum fraction.

Competitive mouse models of GI colonization and disseminated candidiasis (DC).15

We co-infected male and female mice with bar-coded M1 and M2 (1×108 CFUs each) by gavage. M1 significantly out-competed M2 within stool on d1, d3 and d7 [Figure 7A], and in ileum and colon on d7 [Figure 7B]. We then co-infected mice via lateral tail vein with bar-coded strains (5×105 CFUs each). M1 significantly out competed M2 within kidneys, the major DC target organ, at d1, 3 and 7 [Figure 7C]. We also treated a group of M1:M2 co-infected mice with a single dose of micafungin (8.3 mg/kg/mouse intraperitoneal, 30 minutes post-infection). Strain M2 was 59% more competitive with M1 in kidneys at 24h following treatment than it was in absence of micafungin [Figure 7C].

Figure 7. Competitive fitness of trisomy 7 strain M1 and euploid strain M2 in mouse models.

Figure 7.

Barcoded strains M1 and M2 were mixed 1:1 in all experiments; input ratios were confirmed by colony forming unit determinations. At given timepoints, competitive indices (fraction of total population) of M1 and M2 were determined by barcode sequencing. Data are presented as mean ± SEM competitive indices for each strain from 3 independent experiments. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001 A, B. Mouse model of gastrointestinal (GI) colonization. Mice were co-infected via gavage with barcoded M1 and M2 (1×108 CFU of each strain per mouse). Stool samples were obtained on d1, d3 and d7 after inoculation (Figure 7A). On d7, mice were sacrificed, and stomach, ileum and colon were obtained and homogenized for DNA extraction for barcode sequencing (Figure 7B). M1 was significantly more fit than M2 within stool at all time points, and more fit than M2 within ileum and colon. Strains did not differ in fitness within stomachs. C. Mouse model of disseminated candidiasis (DC). Mice were co-infected via lateral tail vein with barcoded strains M1 and M2 (5×105 CFU of each strain per mouse). Kidneys were obtained and homogenized for DNA extraction for barcode sequencing on d1, d3 and d7. A group of co-infected mice were treated with a single dose of micafungin (8.3 mg/kg/mouse intraperitoneal, 30 minutes post-infection), and kidneys were obtained for barcode sequencing 24h following treatment. P-values for were determined using one-way ANOVA test with Dunn’s multiple comparison against inoculum fraction. Tri7 M1 strain was more fit than M2 in the GI and DC models. M2 was significantly more fit within kidneys of mice treated with micafungin than it was within kidneys of untreated mice. NS: nonsignificant; MFG: micafungin

Mono-infection DC.

Finally, we performed single strain infections in which mice were inoculated intravenously with either bar-coded M1 or M2 (1×106 CFU). M1 burdens were significantly higher than M2 burdens within kidneys at d1 and 3 [Supplemental Figure 5]. Both strains were mixtures of yeast and filamentous morphologies within kidneys [Supplemental Figure 6].

Tri7 strains in longitudinal and spiked BCs.

Echinocandin treatment in patient MN was initiated on d2. To estimate point prevalence, we screened 96 strains from longitudinal BCs for attenuated biofilm formation (< 30% of that formed by euploid strain M2) as marker for Tri7 and confirmed results for certain strains by qPCR. Percentages of Tri7 strains were 74% (baseline, 71/96), 7% (d3, 7/96), 2% (d5, 2/96), 2% (d10, 2/96) and 0% (d13, 0/96) [Supplemental Figure 3].

To assess Tri7 stability, we spiked M1 into a sterile BC bottle and incubated at 37°C until turbidity was evident (24–48h). Aliquots were sub-cultured on SDA plates at 30°C for 48h, and each of 10 strains from randomly selected colonies was shown to still harbor Tri7 by WGS [Supplemental Figure 7].

Discussion.

We demonstrated that C. albicans strains from BCs of individual patients were genetically and phenotypically diverse. The most striking within-patient genetic differences among strains were aneuploidies and LOH, which were identified in 3 of 4 patients. In patient MN, Tri7 and euploid strains were equally fit in liquid media, and they exhibited similar micafungin MICs. Euploid strains, however, were more tolerant to micafungin than Tri7 strains by FoG, SMG and competitive growth assays. In contrast, Tri7 strain M1 was more fit than euploid strain M2 during growth in human blood ex vivo, and during mouse models of GI colonization and DC. M2 was more competitive than M1 in mouse kidneys following micafungin treatment of DC than it was in the absence of micafungin. Tri7 strains predominated in patient MN’s baseline BC (74% of the population), but they were largely replaced by euploid strains after 1 and 3d of echinocandin treatment (93% and 98% euploid, respectively). By d13 of BSI, 100% of BC strains were euploid. The data suggest that Tri7 strains were more virulent than euploid strains, which conferred an advantage at baseline in absence of antifungal treatment. Echinocandin tolerant, euploid strains that were present at baseline but unrecognized by the clinical lab emerged as dominant upon echinocandin exposure. These results and our previous findings for C. glabrata- and CRKP-positive BCs challenge the single organism hypothesis of BSI pathogenesis, and they support a population-based paradigm for BSIs by commensal microbes in at least some patients.12,13

Large-scale genetic variants like aneuploidy and LOH, including Tri7, are described in clinical C. albicans strains and in strains exposed to antifungals in vitro or recovered from mouse models of candidiasis.5,15,1922 Aneuploidy can involve any C. albicans Chr, with positive or negative consequences for fitness and antifungal susceptibility depending on specific Chr, strain background and environmental conditions.2325 Findings that Tri7 strain M1 was attenuated for hyphal formation in vitro compared to euploid partner strain M2, while exhibiting enhanced GI colonization, invasion of ileum and colon, and hematogenous infection of kidneys in mice, were consistent with data for certain previously studied Tri7 strains.15,22,25 Echinocandin tolerance has been described for C. albicans strains with Chr2 and Chr5 aneuploidies, but it has not been associated with Tri7.2630 Fluconazole tolerance has been reported in some C. albicans strains causing persistent BSIs despite treatment,16 but neither fluconazole nor echinocandin tolerance are broadly validated as determinants of outcomes in infected patients.16 26,30 We did not identify echinocandin-resistant C. albicans strains. In our C. glabrata study, baseline BCs in 2 of 10 patients were a mixture of fluconazole-susceptible and originally unrecognized fluconazole-resistant strains, the latter of which were later recovered as index strains from recurrent infections. Recently, echinocandin heteroresistance (a low-frequency subpopulation of resistant cells) among C. parapsilosis was connected to echinocandin breakthrough BSIs.31 There is pressing need for multicenter studies of the clinical relevance of phenotypes like antifungal tolerance and heteroresistance that are not detected by standard clinical laboratory susceptibility testing methods.

As is true for antifungal tolerance, the clinical relevance of diversity in virulence among Candida strains is uncertain. While hyphal and biofilm formation are classic C. albicans virulence determinants, it is more precise to understand bidirectional regulation of morphogenesis and biofilm maturation, as dictated by local environment, as crucial to commensalism and pathogenesis.32 It is well recognized that certain C. albicans strains, like Tri7 strains here, manifest filamentation defects on solid agar, but not in liquid media or within target organs. Moreover, strains with attenuated filamentation or biofilm formation in vitro may manifest full or even heightened pathogenic capacity in vivo. In the end, C. albicans is an opportunistic pathogen that does not depend upon a dominant virulence factor, but rather a complex interplay of properties that optimize survival in various in vivo niches.14 At least in part, attenuated hyphal formation by Tri7 strains in vitro has been attributed here and elsewhere to over-expression of NRG1, which was initially described as a transcriptional repressor of C. albicans SC5314 hyphal and stress response genes.15 It is now apparent that NRG1 exerts variable effects on gene expression, filamentation, fitness and virulence depending on strain background.15,33,34 Tri7 was not previously linked to aberrant C. albicans biofilm formation, although high NRG1 expression was shown to limit biofilm maturation and promote dispersion of yeast cells from immature biofilm.35

Tri7 was stable in strain M1 following incubation in spiked BC bottles, suggesting that euploid strains in patient MN emerged in vivo rather than ex vivo. This finding is notable since changes in Candida ploidy are often reversible adaptations to stress.36 We propose that most of the C. albicans and C. glabrata strain diversity we observed in BCs was likely to have arisen during GI commensalism (or at another colonization site).6 We recognize that we may have failed to identify important genetic or phenotypic variants by studying only 10 Candida strains per patient. It is feasible that C. albicans genetic variants other than differences in Chr7 ploidy also contribute to important phenotypes. In our previous study, the predominant within-patient genetic differences among C. glabrata strains from baseline BCs of 10 patients were core genome SNPs and indels.12 Within-patient SNPs and indels were less prevalent among C. albicans strains from BCs of 4 patients. Future studies will elaborate whether differences between spp. have biologic explanations, reflect features that are particular to individual cases, and/or stem from relatively small sample sizes. To date, our studies are the only investigations of within-patient diversity among Candida strains during BSIs. Results cannot necessarily to extrapolated to other Candida spp., other opportunistic commensal microbes, or other sites of infection.

In conclusion, positive BCs contained mixed populations of C. albicans strains that differed most strikingly by aneuploidies and LOH, and in echinocandin tolerance and virulence attributes. Studies to assess the clinical relevance of Candida diversity are indicated, as is research into understanding how diversity and adaptation of various microbes facilitates commensalism and disease. If results here and from our studies of C. glabrata and CRKP BSIs are validated, clinical and microbiology lab practices may need to be revised to consider microbial populations.

Methods.

This study was approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board through Expedited Review according to OHRP, 45 CFR 46.110 and FDA 21 CFR 56.110, and by the University of Pittsburgh Animal Care and Use Committee. Reagents, primers and plasmids appear in Supplemental Tables 3, 4 and 5, respectively. BC bottles and index strains from patients with C. albicans BSI were obtained from the UPMC clinical microbiology laboratory.12 We streaked 10 μL from bottles onto 2 SDA plates and incubated for 48h at 35°C. For each BC, a strain isolated from each of 4–9 morphologically indistinguishable colonies and the index strain underwent Illumina NextSeq WGSing [Supplemental Table 4].

Illumina NextSeq and bioinformatic analysis.

DNA extraction, library preparation and genome analysis were performed as previously published,12 and as described with details of variant filtration in Supplemental Methods.3741 We selected gene variants called in ≥ 1 strain, but not all strains within each patient, focusing on non-synonymous substitutions, disrupted start/stop codons, and frameshift indels. Aneuploidy, gene deletions/duplications and LOH were analyzed using Ymap 42 and reference genome SC5314 (CGD: A21-s02-m09-r10). We used allelic ratio (homozygous: 0 or 1; heterozygous: 0.5) to determine whether a region with SNPs in the parent/reference strain had undergone LOH. Allelic ratio was calculated for each coordinate as: (number of reads with the more abundant base call)/(total number of reads). We selected internal strains for each patient to create a haplotype map and investigate within-patient LOH.

In vitro phenotypes.

Growth rate, filamentation, antifungal susceptibility, micafungin tolerance, dot blot and biofilm assays were performed using well-established protocols, as described in detail in Supplemental Methods.16,17,43

Chromosome copy numbers.

Chr5 and Chr7 copy numbers were determined by qPCR using multiple primer pairs, as previously described [Supplemental Table 5]. Chr1 and Chr4 qPCRs were copy number controls.14

qRT-PCR transcriptional analysis

was performed using SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix.15 Expression was calculated using ΔΔCT, with normalization to housekeeping genes ACT1 and 18S rDNA.

NRG1 over-expression strain.

The NRG1 promoter was replaced with the constitutively expressed TDH3 promoter from plasmid pCJN542 (provided by Aaron Mitchell).44 Euploid strains M2 and N1 were transformed using PCR products from pCJN542 and primers NRG1-OE-F and NRG1-OE-R. Overexpression strains were selected on YPD+clonNAT (YPD, 200 μg/mL nourseothricin sulfate) plates.

Barcoded strains

were constructed as previously described.15 Plasmids RB793 (Addgene #199121) and RB794 (Addgene #199122) containing barcodes were digested with NgoMIV and transformed into target strains. Transformants were selected on YPD+200 μg/mL nourseothricin. Integration at NEUT5L was confirmed by PCR using primers in Supplemental Table 4.

In vitro competitive growth.

Barcoded strains were grown overnight in liquid YPD at 30 C, washed with PBS and diluted in YPD. Strains (1:1 ratio, 1×104 CFU/mL each) were incubated at 39°C with shaking (200rpm). Micafungin (0.125 μg/mL) or H2O2 (1 mM) were added on d0, 3 and 6. On d0, 3, 6 and 9, DNA was extracted from 200μL aliquots for bar code sequencing.

GI colonization model.

We used 8 mice at each time point (equal male:female, 4–6 weeks old, 20–25 g, ICR CD1, Envigo). GI infections were performed as previously described.15 Four days before infection, drinking water was supplemented with 1.5mg/mL ampicillin, 2mg/mL streptomycin and 2.5% glucose. Mice were gavaged with 1×108 CFU of each strain. Fecal pellets from d1, 3, and 7 were homogenized in sterile PBS. On d7, stomach, ileum and colon were homogenized in PBS. Homogenates were plated on SDA plates with 200μg/mL each of ampicillin, streptomycin, chloramphenicol, kanamycin and nourseothricin, and processed for DNA extraction.15

DC model.

We intravenously inoculated 6 and 8 mice (equal male:female) per time point for co-infections and mono-infections, respectively; inocula were 5×105 CFU per barcoded strain (co-infection) or 1×106 CFU (mono-infection). In co-infections, an additional 6 mice were treated with micafungin (8.3 mg/kg/mouse intraperitoneal, 30 minutes post-infection) and sacrificed at 24h. Kidneys were homogenized for DNA extraction and barcode sequencing on d1, 3 and 7 post-infection (co-infection), or for tissue burden determination on SDA (mono-infection).15

Barcode sequencing.

DNA (1–3 μL) extracted from in vitro experiments, fecal samples and organ homogenates (Zymobiomics DNA Miniprep kit; Zymo Research) was used for PCR14 [Supplemental Table 4]. PCR parameters were 98°C for 30s, 98°C for 10s, 60°C for 30s, 72°C for 30s; steps 2 to 4 repeated for 34 cycles; and 72°C for 5 min. PCR products were gel purified (Wizard SV gel and PCR clean-up system, Promega). ExpressPlex library preparation and sequencing was done by SeqWell (MA, USA). Strains were identified by unique barcode using CLC Genomic workbench v.22.0.1. BC1/BC2 ratio was calculated and normalized by initial inoculum. BC2 percent was calculated as: (1/(Ratio+1))X100%.

Populations in longitudinal BC bottles.

Ninety-six strains from each BC in patient MN were screened for attenuated biofilm formation as a marker for Tri7 (mean biofilm OD590 of 3 independent experiments <30% of mean biofilm formed by euploid strain M2). Ploidy was confirmed by qPCR for ≥ 10 strains from each of d0 and d13 BCs.

BC bottle spiking.

A single colony of Tri7 M1 suspended in 50 μl saline was inoculated into a sterile BC bottle (Fisher Scientific BD BACTEC Plus Aerobic medium BD442023) that contained 5 mL blood from a healthy volunteer (~1 CFU/mL), and incubated at 37°C with shaking (225rpm) until turbidity was evident.12 Ten microliters were streaked on an SDA plate, and incubated at 30°C for 48h. Single strains were isolated from 5–10 randomly chosen colonies for DNA extraction and Illumina sequencing.

Statistical analyses

were performed using GraphPad Prism v9.1.2. Symmetric and asymmetric data are presented as means and standard error and as medians and interquartile ranges, respectively. CFU/g were log-transformed prior to analysis. Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U tests were used for comparisons of 2 groups, and one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis for comparisons of >2 groups. For all analyses, p< 0.05 (two-tailed) was significant.

Bioinformatic analyses.

DNA was extracted using Qiagen’s DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Hilden, Germany).(Badrane, Cheng et al. 2023) DNA libraries were prepared with the Nextera XT (Illumina, San Diego) protocol and sequenced to ≥ 50X coverage with 2×150 bp paired end reads. Raw read zipped files were analyzed through a custom-built NextFlow pipeline, which integrates Burrows-Wheeler Aligner for reads mapping to the C. albicans SC5314 genome downloaded from Candida Genome Database (http://www.candidagenome.org/). The Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK, v4.5.0.0) (McKenna, Hanna et al. 2010) was used for deduplicating and sorting of mapped reads, variant calling and filtering after a base quality score recalibration. SnpEff v4.5 was employed for variant annotation.(Cingolani, Platts et al. 2012) Low-confidence variants were filtered using GATK VariantFiltration tool. Variants were included if they fulfilled ≥ 1 of 4 stringent statistical criteria (i.e., variants were filtered if they failed all 4 criteria). The compound filtering expression was: Quality by Depth (QD) < 2; Fisher Strand (FS) > 60; mean square Mapping Quality (MQ) < 40. Additional filtering was applied through customized filtering criteria: minimum genotype quality (GQ) of 50; minimum of 80% support to the alternate allele in allele depth (AD), and minimum depth (DP) of 10. After filtration, the select variants tool extracted SNPs for final VCF files. VCF variant files from all strains were merged using BCFTOOLS.(Danecek, Bonfield et al. 2021) Whole genome multiple sequence alignment (MSA) was extracted from the multi-sample VCF file using VCF2MSA python script (https://github.com/tkchafin/vcf2msa.py). Fasta aligned sequences for each contig were extracted from the merged VCF file using a python script (https://github.com/Bahler-Lab/alignment-from-vcf). All aligned contigs were then merged and converted to a phylip format using a perl script (https://github.com/nylander/catfasta2phyml). A phylogenomic tree was built using RaxML(Kozlov, Darriba et al. 2019) and visualized in iTol v6.(Letunic and Bork 2021)

In vitro phenotypic assays.

In vitro growth.

C. albicans strains were grown in liquid YPD medium overnight at 30°C and diluted in YPD or RPMI1640 with 2% dextrose to OD600 (Optical Density, 600 nm) of 0.1. Diluted cultures were added to 96-well plates in triplicate with 200 μL per well, and growth was monitored at 30°C for 24h in a microplate reader (Molecular Device). Growth curves were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9. Experiments were performed with 3 biological replicates.

In vitro filamentation.

Strains were grown overnight in liquid YPD at 30°C and then cultured in YPD, YPD containing 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), RPMI1640 with 2% glucose or Spider media at 37 °C for 4 h with shaking (200 rpm). Cell suspensions were removed hourly and imaged using microscopy. For filamentation on solid medium, overnight culture grown in YPD at 30°C was washed and adjusted to 107 cells/mL in normal saline; 5 μl were spotted on agar plate and incubated at 30°C.

Antifungal susceptibility testing and tolerance assays.

The sensitivity to cell wall stress-inducing agents were assessed by spotting 5 μL of serial ten-fold dilutions of each strain grown overnight in YPD onto SDA plates impregnated with the indicated chemical agent. The plates were incubated at 30 and 40°C until colonies appeared. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed using the broth dilution technique according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standardized method.((CLSI)) Concentrations ranged from 0.25–256μg/mL for fluconazole (Fisher Scientific 86386–73-4), and 0.015–16μg/mL for echinocandins. At 24 hours, the wells were read visually with a viewing mirror. MIC was set at the lowest drug concentration at which there was a ≥ 50% decrease in growth, relative to growth in no drug containing wells. The plates were also were read using a spectrophotometer reader (SPECTROstar, BMG labtech)) at OD600nm for determination of tolerance. Supra-MIC growth (SMG) was calculated as the average growth per well above the MIC divided by the level of growth without drug.(Rosenberg, Ene et al. 2018, Berman and Krysan 2020) Tolerance was also quantified using disk diffusion.(Rosenberg, Ene et al. 2018, Berman and Krysan 2020) For disk diffusion, overnight growth C. albicans cells (2 × 105 CFU) were spread onto casitone plates (9 g/l Bacto casitone, 5 g/l yeast extract, 15 g/l Bacto agar, 11.5 g/l sodium citrate dehydrate and 2% glucose) with a cotton swab and allowed to air dry for ~30 min. A filter disk containing micafungin (5ug) was placed in the center of the plate and allowed to grow at 35°C for 48 hours. The radius corresponding to the point where growth was inhibited by 20%, 50% or 80% relative to the maximum radius, was measured. Tolerance levels were determined from the degree of growth within the region of growth inhibition detected visually on the plates and calculated using diskImageR and imageJ (fraction of growth, FoG20, FoG50, FoG80, respectively).

Biofilm formation.

Biofilms were formed in flat-bottomed 96-well microplates. For each strain, a cell suspension in normal saline was adjusted to McFarland 0.5 and 1:10 diluted in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 2% (w/v) glucose. Plate wells were inoculated with 200 μL of standardized C.albicans suspension in triplicate and incubated at 37 °C for 90 minutes to allow cell adhesion. A negative control was prepared by inoculating 200 μL RPMI1640 medium. After the adhesion phase, non-adherent cells were removed by thoroughly washing the wells with 0.15 M sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2). Each well was then filled with 200 μL of fresh RPMI1640 medium, and plates were incubated at 37°C for 24h to allow biofilm formation. To assess biofilm formation, culture broth was gently aspirated, and each well was washed twice with PBS and incubated with 100μL methanol for 15 min at room temperature. Plates were left to dry completely in a chemical safety cabinet, followed by staining with 100μL 0.1% crystal violet for 5 min and three washes with dH2O. Crystal violet was dissolved from the stained biomass by adding 100μL of 33% acetic acid and by plate shaking for 1 min at 800 rpm. Supernatants of dissolved crystal violet were transferred into fresh wells of a 96-well plate, and absorbance at 590 nm was recorded using a micro plate reader (Molecular Device).

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1
media-1.xlsx (18.3KB, xlsx)
Supplement 2
media-2.xlsx (194.7KB, xlsx)
Supplement 3
media-3.xlsx (3.1MB, xlsx)
Supplement 4
media-4.xlsx (38.7KB, xlsx)
Supplement 5
media-5.xlsx (21.1KB, xlsx)
Supplement 6

Acknowledgements.

This project was supported by VA Merit Review 1IO1BX001955 (Dr. Clancy) and NIH R21 AI160098 (Dr. Nguyen) awards. Some of the data were presented at IDWeek 2024 (October 14, 2024, Los Angeles, CA). The authors do not report any conflicts of interest.

Data availability.

Datasets are available in data files submitted with this article. WGS data have been deposited in the NCBI database under accession number PRJNA1118730. BioProject and associated SRA metadata are at: https://dataview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/object/PRJNA1118730?reviewer=nuvb3aprq91400u9pri6s57r97

References.

  • 1.Sitterlé E, Maufrais C, Sertour N, Palayret M, D’Enfert C, Bougnoux M-E. Within-Host Genomic Diversity of Candida albicans in Healthy Carriers. Scientific Reports 2019;9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anderson FM, Visser ND, Amses KR, et al. Candida albicans selection for human commensalism results in substantial within-host diversity without decreasing fitness for invasive disease. PLOS Biology 2023;21:e3001822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gabaldon T, Carrete L. The birth of a deadly yeast: tracing the evolutionary emergence of virulence traits in Candida glabrata. FEMS Yeast Res 2016;16:fov110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hickman MA, Zeng G, Forche A, et al. The ‘obligate diploid’ Candida albicans forms mating-competent haploids. Nature 2013;494:55–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hirakawa MP, Martinez DA, Sakthikumar S, et al. Genetic and phenotypic intra-species variation in Candida albicans. Genome Research 2015;25:413–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Carreté L, Ksiezopolska E, Gómez-Molero E, et al. Genome Comparisons of Candida glabrata Serial Clinical Isolates Reveal Patterns of Genetic Variation in Infecting Clonal Populations. Frontiers in Microbiology 2019;10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Munoz JF, Gade L, Chow NA, et al. Genomic insights into multidrug-resistance, mating and virulence in Candida auris and related emerging species. Nat Commun 2018;9:5346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Didelot X, Walker AS, Peto TE, Crook DW, Wilson DJ. Within-host evolution of bacterial pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol 2016;14:150–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Moxon ER, Murphy PA. Haemophilus influenzae bacteremia and meningitis resulting from survival of a single organism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1978;75:1534–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rubin LG. Bacterial colonization and infection resulting from multiplication of a single organism. Rev Infect Dis 1987;9:488–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Young BC, Wu CH, Gordon NC, et al. Severe infections emerge from commensal bacteria by adaptive evolution. Elife 2017;6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Badrane H, Cheng S, Dupont CL, et al. Genotypic diversity and unrecognized antifungal resistance among populations of Candida glabrata from positive blood cultures. Res Sq 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cheng S, Fleres G, Chen L, et al. Within-Host Genotypic and Phenotypic Diversity of Contemporaneous Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from Blood Cultures of Patients with Bacteremia. mBio 2022;13:e0290622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Katsipoulaki M, Stappers MHT, Malavia-Jones D, Brunke S, Hube B, Gow NAR. Candida albicans and Candida glabrata: global priority pathogens. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2024;88:e0002123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kakade P, Sircaik S, Maufrais C, Ene IV, Bennett RJ. Aneuploidy and gene dosage regulate filamentation and host colonization by Candida albicans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2023;120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rosenberg A, Ene IV, Bibi M, et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat Commun 2018;9:2470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Berman J, Krysan DJ. Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi. Nat Rev Microbiol 2020;18:319–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rottmann M, Dieter S, Brunner H, Rupp S. A screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identified CaMCM1, an essential gene in Candida albicans crucial for morphogenesis. Mol Microbiol 2003;47:943–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Anderson MZ, Saha A, Haseeb A, Bennett RJ. A chromosome 4 trisomy contributes to increased fluconazole resistance in a clinical isolate of Candida albicans. Microbiology 2017;163:856–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Selmecki A, Gerami-Nejad M, Paulson C, Forche A, Berman J. An isochromosome confers drug resistance in vivo by amplification of two genes, ERG11 and TAC1. Molecular Microbiology 2008;68:624–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yang F, Todd RT, Selmecki A, Jiang Y-Y, Cao Y-B, Berman J. The fitness costs and benefits of trisomy of each Candida albicans chromosome. Genetics 2021;218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ene IV, Farrer RA, Hirakawa MP, Agwamba K, Cuomo CA, Bennett RJ. Global analysis of mutations driving microevolution of a heterozygous diploid fungal pathogen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2018;115:E8688–E97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Forche A, Cromie G, Gerstein AC, et al. Rapid Phenotypic and Genotypic Diversification After Exposure to the Oral Host Niche in Candida albicans. Genetics 2018;209:725–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Forche A, Solis NV, Swidergall M, et al. Selection of Candida albicans trisomy during oropharyngeal infection results in a commensal-like phenotype. PLOS Genetics 2019;15:e1008137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tso GHW, Reales-Calderon JA, Tan ASM, et al. Experimental evolution of a fungal pathogen into a gut symbiont. Science 2018;362:589–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yang F, Berman J. Beyond resistance: antifungal heteroresistance and antifungal tolerance in fungal pathogens. Current Opinion in Microbiology 2024;78:102439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yang F, Gritsenko V, Slor Futterman Y, et al. Tunicamycin Potentiates Antifungal Drug Tolerance via Aneuploidy in Candida albicans. mBio 2021;12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yang F, Teoh F, Tan ASM, Cao Y, Pavelka N, Berman J. Aneuploidy Enables Cross-Adaptation to Unrelated Drugs. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2019;36:1768–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yang F, Zhang L, Wakabayashi H, et al. Tolerance to Caspofungin in Candida albicans Is Associated with at Least Three Distinctive Mechanisms That Govern Expression of FKS Genes and Cell Wall Remodeling. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2017;61:AAC.00071–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Suwunnakorn S, Wakabayashi H, Rustchenko E. Chromosome 5 of Human Pathogen Candida albicans Carries Multiple Genes for Negative Control of Caspofungin and Anidulafungin Susceptibility. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2016;60:7457–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhai B, Liao C, Jaggavarapu S, et al. Antifungal heteroresistance causes prophylaxis failure and facilitates breakthrough Candida parapsilosis infections. Nat Med 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Saville SP, Lazzell AL, Monteagudo C, Lopez-Ribot JL. EngineeredControl of Cell Morphology In Vivo Reveals Distinct Roles for Yeast andFilamentous Forms of Candida albicans duringInfection. Eukaryotic Cell 2003;2:1053–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mao Y, Solis NV, Filler SG, Mitchell AP. Functional Dichotomy for a Hyphal Repressor in Candida albicans. mBio 2023;14:e0013423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wakade RS, Wellington M, Krysan DJ. The role of the C. albicans transcriptional repressor NRG1 during filamentation and disseminated candidiasis is strain dependent. mSphere 2024;9:e0078523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Uppuluri P, Pierce CG, Thomas DP, Bubeck SS, Saville SP, Lopez-Ribot JL. The Transcriptional Regulator Nrg1p Controls Candida albicans Biofilm Formation and Dispersion. Eukaryotic Cell 2010;9:1531–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Anderson MZ, Dietz SM. Evolution and strain diversity advance exploration of Candida albicans biology. mSphere 2024;9:e0064123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Research 2010;20:1297–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff. Fly 2012;6:80–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 2021;10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kozlov AM, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A. RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 2019;35:4453–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Research 2021;49:W293–W6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Abbey DA, Funt J, Lurie-Weinberger MN, et al. YMAP: a pipeline for visualization of copy number variation and loss of heterozygosity in eukaryotic pathogens. Genome Medicine 2014;6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Institute CaLS. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts. 4th ed. CLSI standard M27. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Nobile CJ, Solis N, Myers CL, et al. Candida albicans transcription factor Rim101 mediates pathogenic interactions through cell wall functions. Cell Microbiol 2008;10:2180–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

References

  1. (CLSI), C. a. L. S. I. “Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts. 4th ed. CLSI standard M27. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017.” [Google Scholar]
  2. Badrane H., Cheng S., Dupont C. L., Hao B., Driscoll E., Morder K., Liu G., Newbrough A., Fleres G., Kaul D., Espinoza J. L., Clancy C. J. and Nguyen M. H. (2023). “Genotypic diversity and unrecognized antifungal resistance among populations of Candida glabrata from positive blood cultures.” Res Sq. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berman J. and Krysan D. J. (2020). “Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi.” Nat Rev Microbiol 18(6): 319–331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cingolani P., Platts A., Wang L. L., Coon M., Nguyen T., Wang L., Land S. J., Lu X. and Ruden D. M. (2012). “A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff.” Fly 6(2): 80–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Danecek P., Bonfield J. K., Liddle J., Marshall J., Ohan V., Pollard M. O., Whitwham A., Keane T., McCarthy S. A., Davies R. M. and Li H. (2021). “Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools.” GigaScience 10(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kozlov A. M., Darriba D., Flouri T., Morel B. and Stamatakis A. (2019). “RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference.” Bioinformatics 35(21): 4453–4455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Letunic I. and Bork P. (2021). “Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation.” Nucleic Acids Research 49(W1): W293–W296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McKenna A., Hanna M., Banks E., Sivachenko A., Cibulskis K., Kernytsky A., Garimella K., Altshuler D., Gabriel S., Daly M. and Depristo M. A. (2010). “The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data.” Genome Research 20(9): 1297–1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rosenberg A., Ene I. V., Bibi M., Zakin S., Segal E. S., Ziv N., Dahan A. M., Colombo A. L., Bennett R. J. and Berman J. (2018). “Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia.” Nat Commun 9(1): 2470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1
media-1.xlsx (18.3KB, xlsx)
Supplement 2
media-2.xlsx (194.7KB, xlsx)
Supplement 3
media-3.xlsx (3.1MB, xlsx)
Supplement 4
media-4.xlsx (38.7KB, xlsx)
Supplement 5
media-5.xlsx (21.1KB, xlsx)
Supplement 6

Data Availability Statement

Datasets are available in data files submitted with this article. WGS data have been deposited in the NCBI database under accession number PRJNA1118730. BioProject and associated SRA metadata are at: https://dataview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/object/PRJNA1118730?reviewer=nuvb3aprq91400u9pri6s57r97


Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES