Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

medRxiv logoLink to medRxiv
[Preprint]. 2024 Nov 15:2024.11.14.24317278. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2024.11.14.24317278

Non-coding genetic variants underlying higher prostate cancer risk in men of African ancestry

Shan Li, Kaniz Fatema, Sundarraj Nidharshan, Arashdeep Singh, Padma Sheila Rajagopal, Dimple Notani, David Takeda, Sridhar Hannenhalli
PMCID: PMC11601708  PMID: 39606387

Abstract

Incidence and severity of prostate cancer (PrCa) substantially varies across ancestries. American men of African ancestry (AA) are more likely to be diagnosed with and die from PrCa than the those of European ancestry (EA). Published polygenic risk scores for developing prostate cancer, even those based on multi-ancestry genome-wide association studies, do not address population-specific genetic mechanisms underlying PrCa risk in men of African ancestry. Specifically, the role of non-coding regulatory polymorphisms in driving inter-ancestry variation in PrCa has not been sufficiently explored. Here, by employing a sequence-based deep learning model of prostate regulatory enhancers, we identified ~2,000 SNPs with higher alternate allele frequency in AA men that potentially affect enhancer function associated with PrCa susceptibility, as supported by our experimental validation. The identified enhancer SNPs (eSNPs) may influence PrCa development through two complementary mechanisms: 1) the alternate allele that increase enhancer activity result in immune suppression and telomere elongation, and 2) the alternate alleles that decrease enhancer activity, lead to de-differentiation and inhibition of apoptosis. Notably, the eSNPs tend to disrupt the binding of known prostate transcription factors including FOX, AR and HOX families. Lastly, the identified eSNPs can be combined into a polygenic risk score that adds value to current GWAS-based risk variants in assessing PrCa risk in independent cohorts.

Full Text Availability

The license terms selected by the author(s) for this preprint version do not permit archiving in PMC. The full text is available from the preprint server.


Articles from medRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES