Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

medRxiv logoLink to medRxiv
[Preprint]. 2024 Nov 17:2024.11.03.24313587. [Version 4] doi: 10.1101/2024.11.03.24313587

Biobank-scale characterization of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias identifies potential disease-causing variants, risk factors, and genetic modifiers across diverse ancestries

Marzieh Khani 1, Fulya Akçimen 2,*, Spencer M Grant 1,*, S Can Akerman 3,4, Paul Suhwan Lee 1, Faraz Faghri 1,5, Hampton Leonard 1,5, Jonggeol Jeffrey Kim 1, Mary B Makarious 1,5, Mathew J Koretsky 1,5, Jeffrey D Rothstein 3,4, Cornelis Blauwendraat 1,2, Mike A Nalls 1,5, Andrew Singleton 1, Sara Bandres-Ciga 1,#
PMCID: PMC11601747  PMID: 39606324

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (AD/ADRDs) pose a significant global public health challenge, underscored by the intricate interplay of genetic and environmental factors that differ across ancestries. To effectively implement equitable, personalized therapeutic interventions on a global scale, it is essential to identify disease-causing mutations and genetic risk and resilience factors across diverse ancestral backgrounds. Exploring genetic-phenotypic correlations across the globe enhances the generalizability of research findings, contributing to a more inclusive and universal understanding of disease. This study leveraged biobank-scale data to conduct the largest multi-ancestry whole-genome sequencing characterization of AD/ADRDs. We aimed to build a valuable catalog of potential disease-causing, genetic risk and resilience variants impacting the etiology of these conditions. We thoroughly characterized genetic variants from key genes associated with AD/ADRDs across 11 genetic ancestries, utilizing data from All of Us, UK Biobank, 100,000 Genomes Project, Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project, and the Accelerating Medicines Partnership in Parkinson’s Disease, including a total of 25,001 cases and 93,542 controls. We prioritized 116 variants possibly linked to disease, including 18 known pathogenic and 98 novel variants. We detected previously described disease-causing variants among controls, leading us to question their pathogenicity. Notably, we showed a higher frequency of APOE ε4/ε4 carriers among individuals of African and African Admixed ancestry compared to other ancestries, confirming ancestry-driven modulation of APOE-associated AD/ADRDs. A thorough assessment of APOE revealed a disease-modifying effect conferred by the TOMM40:rs11556505, APOE:rs449647, 19q13.31:rs10423769, NOCT:rs13116075, CASS4:rs6024870, and LRRC37A:rs2732703 variants among APOE ε4 carriers across different ancestries. In summary, we compiled the most extensive catalog of established and novel genetic variants in known genes increasing risk or conferring resistance to AD/ADRDs across diverse ancestries, providing clinical insights into their genetic-phenotypic correlations. The findings from this investigation hold significant implications for potential clinical trials and therapeutic interventions on a global scale. Finally, we present an accessible and user-friendly platform for the AD/ADRDs research community to help inform and support basic, translational, and clinical research on these debilitating conditions (https://niacard.shinyapps.io/MAMBARD_browser/).

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; dementia; genetics; target prioritization; clinical trials; genetic risk factors; disease-causing variants; protective variants; disease-modifying variants; All of Us; UK Biobank; 100,000 Genomes Project; ADSP; AMP PD

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihpp-2024.11.03.24313587v4-f0007.jpg

Introduction

In 2023, the World Health Organization reported that dementia affects approximately 55 million people worldwide [1]. This number is expected to reach approximately 152.8 million (ranging from 130.8 to 175.9 million) by 2050 [2], placing a significant burden on healthcare infrastructure. Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common form of dementia, represents roughly 60–70% of all cases [1]. Less prevalent forms, such as dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), each account for 10–15% of dementia cases [3,4].

Most of the research conducted thus far on the genetic underpinnings of dementia has primarily focused on populations of European ancestry, limiting the generalizability of findings [5]. Growing evidence indicates significant differences in the genetic architecture of disease among diverse ancestral populations, which raises concerns about the development of therapeutic interventions based on genetic targets primarily identified in a single population. Expanding research to include diverse ancestries is crucial for precision therapeutics. In the new era of personalized medicine, achieving accurate and effective disease-modifying treatments requires a comprehensive understanding of these diseases in a global context.

In recent years, researchers and healthcare institutions worldwide have undertaken ambitious efforts to create large-scale datasets encompassing diverse genetic ancestries, providing valuable insights into the genetic, environmental, and clinical factors influencing disease susceptibility and progression [6,7]. While more work remains in collecting diverse genetic datasets that are dementia-specific, existing efforts can provide valuable insights into dementia research. Currently, All of Us (AoU), UK Biobank (UKB), 100,000 Genomes Project (100KGP), Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP), and the Accelerating Medicines Partnership in Parkinson’s Disease (AMP PD) represent the largest and most prominent publicly available dementia datasets worldwide.

A priority in elucidating the etiology of AD and related dementias (AD/ADRDs) lies in defining cumulative risk; however, very little is known about genetic factors that enhance resistance to or protect against dementia. In genetics, protective variants reduce the risk of developing dementia or delay its onset. They confer protection via a loss-of-function or gain-of-function mechanism and can influence various biological pathways associated with the disease. Resilience variants (disease-modifying factors reducing the penetrance of risk loci) influence the development and course of the disease in individuals already at risk, potentially delaying symptom onset or reducing disease severity by interacting with pre-existing risk variants (genetic modifiers). To the best of our knowledge, 11 protective and 10 resilience variants have been reported in AD, with a particular focus on the role of genetic variation modulating AD risk among homozygous or heterozygous APOE ε4 carriers [814]. Understanding factors that confer protection or resilience can inform therapeutic strategies to reduce the overall burden of dementia, potentially decreasing healthcare costs and the societal impact of the disease.

In this study, we aimed to conduct the largest and most comprehensive multi-ancestry wholegenome sequencing characterization of AD/ADRDs potential disease-causing variation, as well as risk, protective, and disease-modifying factors leveraging biobank-scale data. We screened genetic variants in key genes linked to these conditions, including APP, PSEN1, PSEN2, TREM2, MAPT, GRN, GBA, SNCA, and APOE across a total of 25,001 AD/ADRD cases and 93,542 control individuals, collectively representing 11 ancestries. Furthermore, we assessed protective and disease-modifying variants among different APOE genotype carriers in those ancestry groups. This research is particularly relevant in the context of population-specific target prioritization for therapeutic interventions. Such advancements are crucial, as drug mechanisms supported by genetic insights have a 2.6 times higher likelihood of success than those without such support, underscoring the importance of including diverse genetic data to enhance therapeutic outcomes [15]. Here, we present genetic-phenotypic correlations among identified variants across all datasets and develop a user-friendly platform for the scientific community to help inform and support basic, translational, and clinical research on these debilitating conditions (https://niacard.shinyapps.io/MAMBARD_browser/).

Methods

Demographic information, including age and sex, was provided in the self-reported survey in AoU and through the UKB, ADSP, and AMP PD portals. Self-reported demographic data of participants in 100KGP were obtained from Data Release V18 (12/21/2023) using the LabKey application incorporated into the research environment. Figure 1 displays the demographic characteristics of cohorts under study. Figure 2 shows a summary of our workflow, which we explain in further detail below.

Figure 1-. Demographic and clinical characteristics of biobank-scale cohorts under study.

Figure 1-

The figure illustrates distributions of age, sex, and the number of cases and controls per ancestry across five datasets in this study: All of Us (AoU), Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP), 100,000 Genomes Project (100KGP), UK Biobank (UKB), and Accelerating Medicines Partnership in Parkinson’s Disease (AMP PD). Ancestries represented include European (EUR), African (AFR), American Admixed (AMR), African Admixed (AAC), Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ), Central Asian (CAS), Eastern Asian (EAS), South Asian (SAS), Middle Eastern (MDE), Finnish (FIN), and Complex Admixture History (CAH).

Figure 2-. Workflow.

Figure 2-

Our workflow begins with creating cohorts within the datasets. We leverage short-read whole genome sequencing data to characterize genes of interest. Variant annotation focuses on missense, frameshift, start loss, stop loss, stop gain, and splicing variants. Next, we compare the frequency of identified variants in cases and controls. Pathogenicity assessment involves using ClinVar, Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD), American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines, and Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) scores. Finally, we prioritize variants that are present only in the case cohort and have a CADD score greater than 20.

Discovery phase: All of Us

The All of Us (AoU) Research Program (allofus.nih.gov) launched by the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) endeavors to enhance precision health strategies by assembling rich longitudinal data from over one million diverse participants in the United States. The program emphasizes health equity by engaging underrepresented groups in biomedical research. This biobank includes a wide range of health information, including genetic, lifestyle data, and electronic health records (EHRs), among others, making it a valuable resource for studying the genetic and environmental determinants of various diseases, including AD/ADRDs [6,16].

Data Acquisition

We accessed the AoU data through the AoU researcher workbench cloud computing environment (https://workbench.researchallofus.org/), utilizing Python and R programming languages for querying. We used the online AoU data browser (https://databrowser.researchallofus.org/variants) to extract genetic variants from short-read whole genome sequencing (WGS) data. The selected variants were filtered for protein-altering or splicing mechanisms for further analysis.

Cohort Creation

We generated WGS cohorts using the cohort-creating tool in the AoU Researcher Workbench. AD/ADRD cases were selected based on the condition domain in the EHRs. Controls were selected among individuals ≥ 65 years old without any neurological condition in their EHRs, family history, or neurological history in their self-reported surveys. In total, 539 AD cases, 1,655 related dementias, and 13,835 controls were included in the study.

Whole genome sequencing protocol and quality control assessment

WGS was conducted by the Genome Centers funded by the AoU Research Program [6,17], all of which followed the same protocols. Sequencing details are described elsewhere [18]. Phenotypic data, ancestry features, and principal components (PCs) were generated using Hail within the AoU Researcher Workbench (https://support.researchallofus.org/hc/en-us/articles/4614687617556-How-the-All-of-Us-Genomic-data-are-organized). Ancestry annotation and relatedness were determined using the PC-relate method in Hail and duplicated samples and one of each related participant pair with KINSHIP less than 0.1 being excluded from the Hail data [19] (https://support.researchallofus.org/hc/en-us/articles/4614687617556-How-the-All-of-UsGenomic-data-are-organized). Flagged individuals and low-quality variants (qc.call_rate < 0.90) were removed from the analysis.

Variant Filtering and Analysis

We utilized protein-altering and splicing variants (‘WGS_EXOME_SPLIT_HAIL_PATH’) for our analysis, obtained following the tutorial ‘How to Work with AoU Genomic Data (Hail - Plink) (v7).’ The largest intervals for genomic positions were obtained from the UCSC Genome Browser (https://genome.ucsc.edu/).

Variant datasets were obtained as described in the related workspace (see “How to Work with AoU Genomic Data (Hail - Plink) (v7)” for further details). Genomic positions (GRCh38) for each gene were extracted from the Hail variant dataset. Variant-level quality assessments were applied as described in the Manipulate Hail Variant Dataset tutorial (see the “How to Work with AoU Genomic Data” workspace for further details). VCF files containing the cohorts in the current study were generated using BCFtools v1.12 [20]. Allele frequency and zygosity of each resulting variant were calculated per ancestry using PLINK v2.0 [21] in each of the AD, related dementias, and control cohorts.

Discovery phase: UK Biobank

The UK Biobank (UKB) (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/) is a large-scale biomedical dataset containing detailed genetic, clinical, and lifestyle information from over 500,000 participants aged 40 to 69 years in the United Kingdom. Each participant’s profile includes a diverse array of phenotypic and health-related information. Additionally, the participants’ health has been followed long-term, primarily through linkage to a wide range of health-related records, enabling the validation and characterization of health-related outcomes [7]. This dataset has been instrumental in advancing research on various health conditions, including AD/ADRDs, by facilitating large-scale genome-wide association studies and rare, deleterious variant analyses [7].

Cohort Creation

We accessed UKB data (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/) through the DNAnexus cloud computing environment, utilizing the Python programming language for querying. Three experimental cohorts were defined: AD, related dementias, and controls. The AD cohort was defined by the UKB field ID 42020, using diagnoses according to the UKB’s algorithmically defined outcomes v2.0 (https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/ukb/refer.cgi?id=460). The related dementia cohort was defined by the UKB field ID 42018, using the UKB’s algorithmically defined “Dementia” classification, with the added step of excluding any individuals in the aforementioned AD cohort. The control cohort includes individuals ≥ 65 years without any neurological condition or family history of neurological disorders. Relatedness was calculated with KING [22], and individuals closer than cousins were removed by KINSHIP > 0.0884 to ensure no pair of participants across all three cohorts were related. In total, 4,225 AD cases, 5,306 related dementias, and 56,741 controls were included in the study.

Whole genome sequencing protocol and quality control assessment

Sequencing was conducted using the NovaSeq 6000 platform [23]. These data were then analyzed with the DRAGEN v3.7.8 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) software. Alignment was performed against the GRCh38 reference genome. Further details on quality control metrics can be found at https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/showcase/label.cgi?id=187.

Data Acquisition

WGS data are stored in the UKB as multi-sample aggregated pVCF files, each representing distinct 20 kbp segments for all participants. Genomic ranges were defined for each gene of interest using Ensembl (https://useast.ensembl.org/index.html). Those pVCF files containing any variants within these genomic ranges were included for analysis. Left alignment and normalization were performed on each of these variants using BCFtools v1.15.1 [24]. Then, ANNOVAR [25] was used to annotate the normalized variants.

Variant Filtering and Analysis

We filtered variants to include only those within our genes of interest, annotated as either protein-altering or splicing variants and present in any AD and/or related dementia cases. Allele frequency and zygosity of each resulting variant were calculated per ancestry using PLINK v2.0 [21] in each of the AD, related dementias, and control cohorts.

Discovery phase: 100,000 Genomes Project

The 100,000 Genomes Project (100KGP) (https://www.genomicsengland.co.uk/) has sequenced and analyzed genomes from over 75,000 participants with rare diseases and family members. Early onset dementia (encompassing FTD) is one of the rare diseases studied by the Neurology and Neurodevelopmental Disorders group within the rare disease domain. Participants were recruited by healthcare professionals and researchers from 13 Genomic Medicine Centres in England. The probands were enrolled in the project if they or their guardian provided written consent for their samples and data to be used in research. Probands and, if feasible, other family members were enrolled according to eligibility criteria set for certain rare disease conditions.

WGS data were utilized from 180 unrelated cases with early-onset dementia (encompassing FTD and prion disease) or Parkinson’s disease (PD) with dementia phenotype and 3,479 unrelated controls ≥ 65 years at the time of the analysis. Sequencing and quality control analyses for the 100KGP were previously described elsewhere [26] (https://re-docs.genomicsengland.co.uk/sample_qc/). Protein-altering or splicing variants were obtained using the Exomiser variant prioritization application [27]. Candidate variants were extracted from a multi-sample aggregated VCF provided in the Genomics England research environment.

Replication phase: Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project

The Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP) (https://adsp.niagads.org/), supported by the National Institute on Aging and the National Human Genome Research Institute, aims to generate data associated with AD/ADRDs. This dataset includes genetic data from thousands of individuals with and without AD, facilitating the discovery of novel genetic risk factors and pathways underlying the disease.

We used data from the ADSP dataset (v4) for this study, which included a total of 10,566 AD cases and 16,217 controls. The control cohort includes individuals ≥ 65 years without any neurological condition or family history of neurological disorders. Samples were excluded from further analysis if the sample call rate was less than 95%, the genetically determined sex did not match the sex reported in clinical data, or excess heterozygosity was detected (|F| statistics > 0.25). For quality control purposes, an MAF threshold of 0.1% was used. The missingness rate and allele frequency of these variants were calculated for each ancestry using PLINK v2.0 [21] and PLINK v1.9 [28]. Variant quality control included removing variants with Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium P < 1 × 10−4 in control samples, differential missingness by case-control status at P ≤ 1 × 10−4, and non-random missingness by haplotype at P ≤ 1 × 10−4. Relatedness was calculated with KING [22], and individuals closer than cousins were removed by KINSHIP > 0.0884. Duplicated samples were also removed. ADSP includes a range of cohorts, including extensive family cohorts and cohorts with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal degeneration, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and DLB patients. Only samples labeled as definite AD or control were included in this analysis. We meticulously screened for identified genetic variants with a CADD score > 20 that were present across any of the three discovery datasets (AoU, 100KGP, and UKB) in the ADSP cohort.

Replication phase: Accelerating Medicines Partnership in Parkinson’s Disease

Accelerating Medicines Partnership (AMP) (https://fnih.org/our-programs/accelerating-medicines-partnership-amp/) is a public-private initiative that aims to transform the current model for developing new diagnostics and treatments by jointly identifying and validating promising biological targets for therapeutics. It was launched in 2014 by the NIH, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, multiple biopharmaceutical and life science companies, and several non-profit organizations. AMP PD focuses on advancing research into PD-related disorders and leverages cutting-edge technologies and large-scale data analysis to identify key genetic variants, biomarkers, and therapeutic targets associated with PD-related disorders, with the ultimate goal of developing novel treatments and improving patient outcomes.

We used AMP PD Release 3 genomic data, focusing specifically on DLB cases and controls. Samples were excluded from further analysis if the sample call rate was less than 95%, the genetically determined sex did not match the sex reported in clinical data, or excess heterozygosity was detected (|F| statistics > 0.25). Variant quality control included removing variants with missingness above 0.05%. Relatedness was calculated with KING [22], and individuals closer than first cousins were removed by KINSHIP > 0.0884. After quality control and ancestry prediction, this dataset contains a total of 2,530 DLB cases and 3,270 controls, characterized as individuals ≥ 65 years without any neurological condition or family history of any neurological disorders. We screened for identified variants with a CADD score > 20 that were present across all three discovery datasets (AoU, 100KGP, and UKB) within AMP PD. Allele frequency of these variants per ancestry was calculated using PLINK v2.0 [21] and PLINK v1.9 [28].

Ancestry Prediction Analysis

All samples in AoU, UKB, ADSP, and AMP PD datasets underwent a custom ancestry prediction pipeline included in the GenoTools package (https://github.com/dvitale199/GenoTools) [29]. In brief, ancestry was defined using reference panels from the 1000 Genomes Project, the Human Genome Diversity Project, and an Ashkenazi Jewish population dataset. We used a panel of 4,008 samples from 1000 Genomes Project and the Gene Expression Omnibus database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo; accession no. GSE23636) to define ancestry reference populations. The reference panel was then reduced to exclude palindromic SNPs (AT or TA or GC or CG). SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF) < 0.05, genotyping call rate < 0.99, and HWE P < 1E-4 in the reference panel were further excluded. Variants overlapping between the reference panel SNP set and the samples of interest were then extracted. Any missing genotypes were imputed using the mean of that particular variant in the reference panel. The reference panel samples were split into an 80/20 train/test set, and then PCs were fitted using the set of overlapping SNPs described previously. The PCs were then transformed via UMAP to represent global genetic population substructure and stochastic variation. A classifier was then trained on these UMAP transformations of the PCs (linear support vector). Based on the test data from the reference panel and at 5-fold cross-validation, 11 ancestries were predicted consistently with balanced accuracies greater than 0.95.

Genetic ancestry in 100KGP was estimated by generating PCs for 1000 Genomes Project phase 3 samples and projecting all participants onto the super populations in the 1000 Genomes Project, as described elsewhere (https://re-docs.genomicsengland.co.uk/ancestry_inference/). Despite our efforts to utilize GenoTools, we encountered significant challenges during its implementation in Genomics England’s High-Performance Computing Cluster (HPC). Consequently, GenoTools and Genomics England’s HPC were incompatible in this context. PCA plots across all biobanks are shown in Supplementary Figure 1.

Evaluation of potential disease-causing mutations, risk factors, and disease risk modifiers across ancestries

In the discovery phase, variants were filtered out based on their presence in control individuals across biobanks. To prioritize potential disease-causing mutations, we followed the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines (https://wintervar.wglab.org/), leveraging existing clinical and population databases and pathogenicity predictors including the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) (https://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/ac/index.php), dbSNP (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/), gnomAD (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/), ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/), PolyPhen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/), and Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) scores (GRCh38-v1.7) (https://cadd.gs.washington.edu/).

Secondly, we investigated APOE, the major risk factor for AD/ADRDs, across diverse ancestries. We used PLINK (v1.9 and v2.0) [21,28] to extract genotypes for two APOE variants, rs429358 (chr19:44908684–44908685) and rs7412 (chr19:44908821–44908823), as a proxy for APOE allele status (ε1, ε2, ε3, and ε4) in the AoU, UKB, ADSP, and AMP PD datasets. Data analysis was conducted as reported elsewhere (https://github.com/neurogenetics/APOE_genotypes). In the 100KGP dataset, APOE genotypes were analyzed using PLINK v2.0 [21] in a multi-sample aggregated VCF provided in the Genomics England research environment. Subsequently, we calculated the number of individuals with each genotype per ancestry and their frequency percentages.

Finally, we assessed disease modifiers for APOE ε4 homozygous and heterozygous carriers specifically. A total of 21 variants, previously identified as either protective (n=11) or resilient (n=10), were extracted from all datasets using the same protocol previously described. Among them, ABCA7:rs72973581-A, APP:rs466433-G, APP:rs364048-C, NOCT:rs13116075-G, SORL1:rs11218343-C, SLC24A4:rs12881735-C, CASS4:rs6024870-A, EPHA1:rs11762262-A, SPPL2A:rs59685680-G, APP:rs63750847-T, PLCG2:rs72824905-G are protective, while 19q13.31:rs10423769-A, APOE:rs449647-T, FN1:rs140926439-T, FN1:rs116558455-A, RELN:rs201731543-C, TOMM40:rs11556505-T, RAB10:rs142787485-G, LRRC37A:rs2732703-G, NFIC:rs9749589-A, and the APOE3 Christchurch:rs121918393-A variant are reported to be resilient. These variants were then checked across all APOE genotypes and ancestries. Carrier frequencies (either heterozygous or homozygous) were calculated for each APOE genotype and ancestry and were then combined across each of the datasets. In AoU, a variant dataset in Hail format (WGS_VDS_PATH) was used for the analysis. PLINK v2.0 [21] and R v4.3.1 (https://www.r-project.org/) were used to assess the protective model (which evaluates the effect of each protective/disease-modifying variant on the phenotype), conditional model (which evaluates the effect of each protective/disease-modifying variant on the phenotype in the presence of APOE (ε4, ε4/ε4, ε3/ε3)), R2 model (which evaluates the correlation of each protective/disease-modifying variant with APOE (ε4, ε4/ε4, ε3/ε3)), and interaction model (which evaluates putative interactions between each protective/disease-modifying variant and APOE (ε4, ε4/ε4, ε3/ε3) on the phenotype). Logistic and linear regression analyses, adjusting for APOE status, sex, age, and PCs, were applied in the most well-powered dataset (ADSP) to explore these effects.

Results

Large-scale genetic characterization nominates known and novel potential disease-causing variants associated with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias

A summary of the identified variants can be found in Figure 3. We identified a total of 159 variants in the APP, PSEN1, PSEN2, TREM2, GRN, MAPT, GBA1, and SNCA genes within the AoU dataset. All variants and their allele frequencies across different ancestries are available in Supplementary Table 1. Among these, 30 genetic variants were present only in cases and had a CADD score > 20 (CADD score > 20 means that the variant is among the top 1% most pathogenic in the genome, as a proxy for its deleteriousness). All 30 of these identified variants were heterozygous. Of these, four were previously reported in AD or FTD (Table 1), while 26 were novel (Table 2). Of the four known variants, two were found in cases of European ancestry, one of African ancestry, and one of American Admixed ancestry. Among the 26 novel variants, 18 were found in cases of European ancestry, three in cases of African ancestry, two in cases of American ancestry, one in a case of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry, and two in cases of African Admixed ancestry.

Figure 3-. Mutation sites from identified genetic variants mapped on the predicted protein structures encoded by genes associated with AD/ADRDs.

Figure 3-

The predicted protein structures encoded by eight genes associated with AD/ADRDs (APP, PSEN1, PSEN2, TREM2, GBA1, GRN, MAPT, and SNCA) were obtained from the EMBL AlphaFold Protein Structure Database to ensure that all of the residues are present in each protein structure. PyMOL v. 2.6.0 was used to represent the protein structures and their associated mutation sites from identified genetic variants. The yellow color shows beta sheets, the red color shows alpha helices, and the green color shows connecting loops and turns.

Table 1-.

Discovery phase: Multi-ancestry summary of known potential disease-causing variants only present in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia cases in AoU, 100KGP and UKB

Gene Position rs ID/ClinVar ID cDNA changes Protein change/Splicing Clinical significance HGMD/Disease reported CADD Genetic ancestry Zygosity GnomAD
AoU
APP chr21: 25891796* rs63750066 C>T p.A713T Pathogenic, Likely pathogenic, VUS CM930033, AD 26.9 EUR Het 3.64E-05
PSEN1 chr14:73170945 rs63749824 C>T p.A79V Pathogenic, Likely pathogenic CM981649, AD 26.1 AFR Het 1.34E-05
MAPT chr17:46024061 rs63750424 C>T p.R406W Pathogenic,VUS CM981237, FTD with parkinsonism 23.9 EUR Het 1.98E-05
GRN chr17:44350757 rs777704177 G>A p.C222Y VUS CM149714, AD 28.9 AMR Het 2.24E-05
100KGP
PSEN1 chr14:73198067 rs63750900 G>A p.R269H Pathogenic, Likely pathogenic CM971254, AD 29.9 EUR Het 8.48E-06
UKB
GBA1 chr1:155237446 rs1671825414 G>T p.F298L Likely pathogenic CM000164, Gaucher disease 2 23.6 EUR Het 6.78E-06
GBA1 chr1:155238206 rs381427 A>C p.V230G Pathogenic/VUS CM980833, Gaucher disease 22.5 EUR Het 3.39E-06
GBA1 chr1:155238228 rs61748906 A>G p.W223R Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic/VUS CM001166, Gaucher disease 2 28 EUR Het 1.19E-05
GBA1 chr1:155238302 rs80222298 G>A p.P198L Likely pathogenic, VUS CM980827, Gaucher disease 28.6 EUR Het 8.62E-07
PSEN1 chr14:73170945 rs63749824 C>T p.A79V Pathogenic, Likely pathogenic CM981649, AD 26.1 EUR Het 1.10E-05
PSEN1 chr14:73192832 rs63750526 C>A p.A246E Pathogenic, Likely pathogenic CM951075, AD 25.4 EUR Het 8.48E-07
PSEN1 chr14:73198061 rs63750779 C>T p.P267L Likely pathogenic CM033803, AD 25.8 EUR Het 8.49E-07
PSEN1 chr14:73198067 rs63750900 G>A p.R269H Pathogenic, Likely pathogenic CM971254, AD 29.9 EUR Het 8.48E-06
GRN chr17:44350449 VCV001922048.3 ->CTGTGAAGACAGGGTGCACTGCTGT p.P166fs* Pathogenic Not reported, FTD 34 EUR Het 8.48E-07
GRN chr17:44350801 rs63749817 G>A c.708+1G>A Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic CS200794, FTD 34 EUR Het 3.42E-06
GRN chr17:44351438 rs63751177 G>A p.W304X Pathogenic CM064045, FTD - CM188618, FTLD 39 AJ Het 0
GRN chr17:44352087 rs63751180 C>T p.R418X Pathogenic CM062773, FTD 25.6 EUR Het 4.24E-06
GRN chr17:44352404 rs63751294 C>T p.R493X Pathogenic CM064044, FTD 36 EUR Het 1.53E-05
MAPT chr17:46024061 rs63750424 C>T p.R406W Pathogenic, VUS CM981237, FTD with parkinsonism 23.9 EUR Het 1.86E-05
APP chr21:25891784 rs63750264 C>T p.V717L Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic CM003587, AD 26.8 EUR Het 1.70E-06
APP chr21:25891856 rs63750579 C>G p.E693Q Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic CM920067, AD 27.1 EUR Het -

Key: cDNA, complementary DNA; VUS, variant uncertain significance; Het, Heterozygous; CADD,Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; Clinical significance based on dbSNP, ClinVar, and ACMG guideline. AoU, All of Us; 100KGP, 100,000 Genomes Project; UKB, UK Biobank; EUR, European; AFR, African; AMR, American Admixed; AAC, African Admixed; AJ, Ashkenazi Jewish; CAS, Central Asian; EAS, Eastern Asian; SAS, South Asian; MDE, Middle Eastern; FIN, Finnish; CAH, Complex Admixture History.

HGMD; Human Gene Mutation Database, The frequency of gnomAD refers to the frequency in the ancestry where the variations were found. Bold variants were replicated in different databases. Disease reported refers to the disease for which the variants were previously reported.

*,

This variant was not replicated only in cases across the diverse biobanks in the discovery phase. Position refers to GRCh 38.

Table 2-.

Discovery phase: Multi-ancestry summary of novel potential disease-causing variants only present in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia cases in AoU, 100KGP and UKB

Gene Position rs ID/ClinVar ID cDNA changes Protein change/Splicing Clinical significance CADD PP2 prediction Genetic ancestry Zygosity GnomAD
AoU
APP chr21:25881764 Novel G>A p.A740V VUS 26.7 Probably Damaging AJ Het 0
APP chr21:25911860 rs765301301 A>C p.L597W VUS 25.7 Probably Damaging AFR Het 1.47E-04
APP chr21:26021894 Novel T>C p.S271G VUS 24.5 Benign EUR Het 0
APP chr21:25982349 rs2042464223 A>T p.S407T VUS 24.2 Probably Damaging EUR Het 3.60E-06
APP chr21:25982445* rs141331202 C>T p.V375I VUS 25.7 Probably Damaging EUR Het 3.22E-05
APP chr21:25982457 rs747438691 T>C p.T371A VUS 24.6 Possibly Damaging AMR Het 4.57E-05
APP chr21:25997360 rs749453173 G>A p.L364F VUS 23.9 Benign AFR Het 1.74E-04
PSEN1 chr14:73170869 Novel C>T p.R54X Pathogenic 36 - AFR Het 2.70E-06
PSEN2 chr1:226890133 rs1410382029 T>C p.S296P VUS 33 Probably Damaging EUR Het 0
PSEN2 chr1:226891797 Novel CT>C p.L344X Pathogenic 23.9 - AMR Het 0
PSEN2 chr1:226888098 rs1661490243 A>G p.H169R VUS 26.2 Probably Damaging EUR Het 8.48E-07
PSEN2 chr1:226890124 rs199689738 A>T p.I293L VUS 27.1 Possibly Damaging EUR Het 4.16E-05
PSEN2 chr1:226891817 rs759669954 G>A p.G349R VUS 22.1 Benign AAC Het 8.45E-05
GRN chr17:44350296 rs1248058567 T>C p.C140R VUS 24.2 Probably Damaging EUR Het 5.71E-06
GRN chr17:44350735 rs1201429668 T>C p.C215R VUS 29.5 Probably Damaging EUR Het 4.78E-06
GRN chr17:44351575 Novel A>G p.H320R VUS 26.2 Probably Damaging EUR Het 2.86E-06
GRN chr17:44352682 rs63750116 C>T p.R556C VUS 24.7 Probably Damaging EUR Het 7.19E-06
MAPT chr17:45974472 rs747085337 G>A g.45974472G>A - 23.3 - EUR Het 6.33E-06
MAPT chr17:45983788 Novel AGGGGCCCCTGGAGAGGGGCCAGAGGCCC>A p.G332LfsX64 - 27.3 - EUR Het 0
MAPT chr17:46018716 rs948573449 G>A p.G701R VUS 34 Probably Damaging EUR Het 8.10E-06
MAPT chr17:46024088* rs768841567 G>A p.G750S VUS 33 Probably Damaging EUR Het 2.20E-05
TREM2 chr6:41161502 rs369181900 C>T p.C51Y VUS 27.9 Probably Damaging EUR Het 1.44E-05
TREM2 chr6:41161523 Novel C>T p.W44X Pathogenic 37 - AAC Het 0
GBA1 chr1:155239657 rs759174705 G>T p.P138H VUS 22.3 Benign EUR Het 2.54E-06
GBA1 chr1:155239762 rs748485792 C>T p.G103D VUS 20.4 Benign EUR Het 3.60E-06
SNCA chr4:89822256 rs757477802 T>C p.Q99R VUS 21.9 Benign EUR Het 1.36E-05
100KGP
APP chr21:25954665* rs779792929 A>G p.Y407H VUS 25.6 Probably Damaging EUR Het 8.31E-05
PSEN2 chr1:226891349 rs565698726 G>A p.D320N VUS 21.8 Benign EUR Het 5.93E-06
UKB
GBA1 chr1:155235769 rs747284798 G>A p.R347C VUS 31 Probably damaging EUR Het 8.47E-06
GBA1 chr1:155236249 rs1057519358 A>G p.I320T VUS 25.3 Probably damaging EUR Het 7.63E-06
GBA1 chr1:155236262 Novel T>G p.S316R VUS 27.7 Probably damaging EUR Het 2.54E-06
GBA1 chr1:155236471 Novel T>C c.1000–2A>G - 31 - EUR Het -
GBA1 chr1:155237564 Novel T>C p.Y172C VUS 28 Probably damaging EUR Het 4.24E-06
GBA1 chr1:155237579 Novel G>A c.762–1G>A - 26.8 - EUR Het -
GBA1 chr1:155239639 Novel A>G p.L57P Likely pathogenic 28.2 Probably damaging EUR Het 8.47E-07
GBA1 chr1:155239685 rs1671971599 C>T p.A42T VUS 21.1 Possibly damaging EUR Het 0.00E+00
PSEN2 chr1:226885581 rs1363866270 C>T p.R134C VUS 32 Probably damaging EUR Het 1.70E-06
PSEN2 chr1:226885632 Novel G>T p.V151F VUS 20.8 Benign EUR Het 8.48E-07
PSEN2 chr1:226888846 Novel A>T p.Y195F VUS 28.2 Possibly damaging EUR Het 7.63E-06
PSEN2 chr1:226888864 rs200410369 A>G p.Y201C VUS 28.5 Probably damaging EUR Het 1.27E-05
PSEN2 chr1:226891284 rs1482790603 T>C p.M298T VUS 25.3 Possibly damaging EAS Het 1.34E-04
PSEN2 chr1:226891344 Novel C>A p.P318H VUS 23.7 Possibly damaging EUR Het 1.70E-06
PSEN2 chr1:226891347 Novel A>- p.Y319fs - 27.9 - EUR Het -
PSEN2 chr1:226891809 rs1365789341 G>A p.G346D VUS 20.3 Benign EUR Het 8.47E-07
PSEN2 chr1:226891817 rs759669954 G>A p.G349R VUS 22.1 Benign EUR Het 0
PSEN2 chr1:226891844 Novel A>G p.R358G VUS 23.4 Benign EUR Het 8.48E-07
PSEN1 chr14:73170851 rs1377702483 G>A p.E48K VUS 23.1 Possibly damaging EUR Het 2.54E-06
PSEN1 chr14:73170998 rs63750852 G>A p.V97M VUS 28.3 Probably damaging EUR Het 7.63E-06
PSEN1 chr14:73170999 rs1356498068 T>C p.V97A VUS 25.6 Probably damaging EUR Het 8.47E-07
PSEN1 chr14:73186896 rs63750771 T>C p.F175S VUS 23.7 Probably damaging EUR Het 8.48E-07
PSEN1 chr14:73192754 rs763831389 G>A p.R220Q VUS 23.8 Possibly damaging EUR Het 5.93E-06
PSEN1 chr14:73198040 Novel C>G p.A260G VUS 26.8 Probably damaging EUR Het 8.57E-07
PSEN1 chr14:73198052 Novel C>G p.P264R Likely pathogenic 25.7 Probably damaging EUR Het 8.50E-07
PSEN1 chr14:73206388 rs63750298 A>G p.T291A VUS 27.8 Possibly damaging EUR Het 5.93E-06
PSEN1 chr14:73211836 Novel ->GCCC p.E341fs - 34 - EUR Het -
PSEN1 chr14:73217129 rs63750323 G>C p.G378A Likely pathogenic 25.4 Probably damaging EUR Het 5.09E-06
PSEN1 chr14:73219155 rs1555358260 C>T p.L424F Likely pathogenic 25.1 Probably damaging EUR Het -
PSEN1 chr14:73219188 Novel C>A p.L435I Likely pathogenic 25.8 Probably damaging EUR Het 1.70E-06
PSEN1 chr14:73219194 rs764971634 A>G p.I437V Likely pathogenic, VUS 23 Benign EUR Het 6.78E-06
PSEN1 chr14:73219254 rs1430581353 A>G p.M457V VUS 23.5 Probably damaging EUR Het 1.70E-06
GRN chr17:44349248 rs63751057 ->GCCT p.V28fs - 33 - EUR Het 4.24E-06
GRN chr17:44349529 rs63751193 C>- p.S81fs Pathogenic 32 - EUR Het 8.47E-07
GRN chr17:44350291 rs146769257 C>A p.T138K VUS 24.6 Probably damaging AFR Het 4.01E-05
GRN chr17:44350303 Novel ->GGTC p.M142fs - 26.1 - EUR Het -
GRN chr17:44350553 Novel C>T p.P192S VUS 24.1 Probably damaging EUR Het 1.70E-06
GRN chr17:44350801 Novel G>T c.708+1G>T - 32 - EUR Het 1.71E-06
GRN chr17:44351082 Novel ->TG p.V252fs - 25.8 - EUR Het -
GRN chr17:44351610 Novel A>G p.K332E VUS 20.3 Benign EUR Het 3.39E-06
GRN chr17:44351663 Novel ->G p.P349fs - 23 - EUR Het 8.48E-07
GRN chr17:44352025 Novel G>A p.C397Y VUS 26.4 Probably damaging EUR Het 8.48E-07
GRN chr17:44352249 Novel G>A c.1413+1G>A - 35 - EUR Het 8.49E-07
GRN chr17:44352395 rs886053006 G>A p.V490M VUS 25.4 Probably damaging EUR Het 3.39E-06
MAPT chr17:45962447 rs966689443 G>C p.G37A VUS 21.6 Probably damaging EUR Het 3.56E-05
MAPT chr17:45978420 rs139796158 C>G p.A60G VUS 25.1 Probably damaging AFR Het 5.64E-04
MAPT chr17:45978422 Novel G>T p.A61S VUS 23.9 Probably damaging EUR Het 1.70E-06
MAPT chr17:45982886 rs940936590 C>T p.R103W - 20.5 - EUR Het 1.93E-05
MAPT chr17:45983453 rs2073193780 G>A p.E292K VUS 23.1 Possibly damaging EUR Het 8.50E-07
MAPT chr17:45983504 Novel C>- p.P309fs - 22.5 - EUR Het -
MAPT chr17:45996504 rs779901466 G>A p.R163Q VUS 29.3 Probably damaging EUR Het 8.83E-06
MAPT chr17:45996630 Novel C>T p.T205I VUS 27.5 Probably damaging EUR Het 8.48E-07
MAPT chr17:46010394 Novel G>A p.G245S VUS 33 Probably damaging EUR Het 3.46E-06
MAPT chr17:46018621 Novel G>A p.G245D VUS 33 Probably damaging EUR Het 8.51E-07
MAPT chr17:46018639 Novel A>G p.K251R VUS 24.7 Probably damaging EUR Het -
MAPT chr17:46024019 rs991713081 A>G p.I303V VUS 26.2 Probably damaging EUR Het 4.24E-06
APP chr21:25891742 Novel T>G p.I600L VUS 25.4 - EUR Het 5.09E-06
APP chr21:25905045 rs768182065 G>C p.R517G VUS 25.8 Probably damaging SAS Het 3.30E-05
APP chr21:25905048 rs368159818 C>T p.D516N VUS 27 Probably damaging EUR Het 5.09E-06
APP chr21:25911879 rs201874897 C>T p.D460N VUS 26.9 Probably damaging EUR Het 5.09E-06
APP chr21:25911885 rs755645885 C>T p.G458R VUS 27.8 Probably damaging EUR Het 1.19E-05
APP chr21:25954659 rs200500889 G>A p.R409C VUS 32 Probably damaging EUR Het 5.93E-06
APP chr21:25982424 rs752243493 G>A p.P251S VUS 26.4 Probably damaging EUR Het 1.10E-05
APP chr21:26000138 rs200539466 T>C p.I248V VUS 23.1 Probably damaging EUR Het 1.27E-05
APP chr21:26021858 rs772069024 C>G p.V227L VUS 25.4 Probably damaging EUR Het 8.48E-07
APP chr21:26021912 rs754672142 C>T p.A209T VUS 20.9 Probably damaging EUR Het 4.24E-06
APP chr21:26051100 rs199744129 G>A p.P132S VUS 27.9 Probably damaging EUR Het 1.70E-06
SNCA chr4:89726638 rs746232417 G>T p.P90H Likely pathogenic 24.6 Probably damaging EUR Het 2.55E-06
SNCA chr4:89822281 Novel C>A p.A91S Likely pathogenic 23.8 Probably damaging EUR Het 1.70E-06
TREM2 chr6:41161292 Novel A>C p.L121R VUS 27 Probably damaging EUR Het 6.78E-06
TREM2 chr6:41161343 Novel T>A p.D104V VUS 23.7 Probably damaging EUR Het 8.47E-07

Key: cDNA, complementary DNA; VUS, variant uncertain significance; Het, Heterozygous; CADD,Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion; PP2,PolyPhen-2; Clinical significance based on dbSNP, ClinVar, and ACMG guideline. Position refers to GRCh 38.

AoU, All of Us; 100KGP, 100,000 Genomes Project; UKB, UK Biobank; EUR, European; AFR, African; AMR, American Admixed; AAC,African Admixed; AJ, Ashkenazi Jewish; CAS, Central Asian; EAS, Eastern Asian; SAS, South Asian; MDE, Middle Eastern; FIN, Finnish; CAH, Complex Admixture History. The frequency of gnomAD refers to the frequency in the ancestry where the variants were found. Bold variants were replicated in different databases. Novel in the title means it has not been reported for the disease.

*,

These variants were not replicated only in cases across the diverse biobanks in the discovery phase.

Within the UKB, we identified a total of 650 variants in the APP, PSEN1, PSEN2, TREM2, GRN, MAPT, GBA1, and SNCA genes (Supplementary Table 2). Among these, 87 variants were present only in cases and had a CADD score > 20. All 87 identified variants were heterozygous. Of these, 16 were previously reported as disease-causing in AD, FTD, frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), and Gaucher disease (Table 1), while 71 were novel (Table 2). A majority (n = 82) of the variants were identified in individuals of European genetic ancestry, two in cases of African ancestry, and one each in cases of South Asian, East Asian, and Ashkenazi Jewish ancestries, respectively. The allele frequencies of the variants across different ancestries are reported in Supplementary Table 2.

We identified a total of 11 variants in the APP, PSEN1, PSEN2, GRN, and GBA1 genes within the 100KGP data (Supplementary Table 3). Among cases, no variants were identified in the MAPT, TREM2, and SNCA genes. Of the 11 variants, three were only present in cases and had a CADD score > 20. All three identified variants were heterozygous and previously reported in individuals of European ancestry. Among these three variants, PSEN1 p.R269H had been previously reported as a cause of AD (Table 1), while the remaining two variants in the APP and PSEN2 genes were novel (Table 2). The allele frequency of each variant is presented in Supplementary Table 3.

Replication analyses support the relevance of identified genetic variation across diverse ancestries

Six variants identified in AoU, 16 identified in UKB, and three identified in 100KGP were replicated in AD cases in the ADSP cohort (Table 3). Among the six variants found in AoU that were replicated in ADSP, two variants — APP p.A713T and PSEN1 p.A79V — had been previously reported, while four variants — APP p.L597W, MAPT p.G701R, MAPT p.G750S, and SNCA p.Q99R — were novel, with APP p.L597W being found in African, African Admixed, and Complex Admixture History ancestries. Searching for other dementia cases resulted in the identification of APP p.A713T in one DLB case and PSEN1 p.A79V in a possible AD case according to ADSP diagnosis criteria. The allele frequency of each variant per genetic ancestry in cases and controls is reported in Table 3.

Table 3-.

Replication phase: potential disease-causing variants only present in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia cases in ADSP

Cases
Variant status Gene Position Protein change rs ID Number of AD Cases AT in AD Cases (n=10566) AF(AAC)-AD (n=1119) AF(AMR)-AD (n=1086) AF(FIN)-AD (n=11) AF(CAS)-AD (n=20) AF(MDE)-AD (n=27) AF(AFR)-AD (n=664) AF(EAS)-AD (n=50) AF(AJ)-AD (n=537) AF(SAS)-AD (n=176) AF(EUR)-AD (n=5812) AF(CAH)-AD (n=1064) MISSING CT OBS CT F MISS ALT FREQS OBS CT Rep orted in other diseases
AoU
 Known APP chr21: 25891796:C:T p.A713T rs63750066 1 4.73E-05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.61E-05 0 11 36361 3.03E-04 8.25E-05 72700 I DLB
 Known PSEN1 chr14:73170945:C:T p.A79V rs63749824 5 2.37E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.30E-04 0 8 36361 2.20E-04 1.24E-04 72706 1 Possible AD
 Novel APP chr21:25911860:A:C p.L597W rs765301301 3 1.42E-04 8.94E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.70E-04 2 36361 5.50E-05 4.13E-05 72718 0
 Novel MAPT chr17:46018716:G:A p.G701R rs948573449 1 4.73E-05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.61E-05 0 6 36361 1.65E-04 1.38E-05 72710 0
 Novel MAPT chr17:46024088:G:A p.G750S rs768841567 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 36361 4.40E-04 2.75E-05 72690 0
 Novel SNCA chr4:89822256:T:C p.Q99R rs757477802 1 4.73E-05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.61E-05 0 5 36361 1.38E-04 2.75E-05 72712 0
100KGP
 Known PSEN1 chr14:73198067:G:A p.R269H rs63750900 5 2.37E-04 8.94E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.58E-04 0 9 36361 2.48E-04 1.10E-04 72704 1 MCI
 Novel PSEN2 chr1:226891349:G A p.D320N rs565698726 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 36361 4.13E-04 6.88E-05 72692 0
 Novel APP chr21:25954665:A:G p.Y407H rs779792929 2 9.46E-05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.72E-04 0 7 36361 1.93E-04 5.50E-05 70708 0
UKB
 Known GBA1 chr1:155238228:A:G p.W223R rs61748906 1 4.73E-05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.70E-04 7 36361 1.93E-04 5.50E-05 72708 1 PSP
 Novel PSEN2 chr1:226891817:G:A p.G349R rs759669954 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 36361 4.13E-04 1.38E-05 72692 0
 Known PSEN1 chr14:73170945:C:T p.A79V rs63749824 5 2.37E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.30E-04 0 8 36361 2.20E-04 1.24E-04 72706 1 Possible AD
 Novel PSEN1 chr14:73192754:G:A p.R220Q rs763831389 3 1.42E-04 0 0 0 0 0 7.53E-04 0 0 0 1.72E-04 0 6 36361 1.65E-04 5.50E-05 72710 0
 Known PSEN1 chr14:73198067:G:A p.R269H rs63750900 5 2.37E-04 8.94E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.58E-04 0 9 36361 2.48E-04 1.10E-04 72704 1 MCI
 Novel PSEN1 chr14:73206388:A:G p.T291A rs63750298 1 4.73E-05 4.47E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 36361 1.38E-04 6.88E-05 72712 0
 Novel PSEN1 chr14:73219194:A:G p.I437V rs764971634 1 4.73E-05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.60E-05 0 0 36361 0 1.38E-05 72722 0
 Novel PSEN1 chr14:73219254:A:G p.M457V rs1430581353 1 4.73E-05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.60E-05 0 2 36361 5.50E-05 1.38E-05 72718 0
 Novel GRN chr17:44352395:G:A p.V490M rs886053006 1 4.73E-05 4.47E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 36361 3.58E-04 1.38E-05 72696 0
 Known GRN chr17:44352404:C:T p.R493X rs63751294 3 1.42E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.58E-04 0 20 36361 5.50E-04 6.88E-05 72682 0
 Novel MAPT chr17:45978420:C:G p.A60G rs139796158 2 9.46E-05 8.98E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 416 36361 1.14E-02 1.67E-04 71890 1 MCI
 Novel MAPT chr17:45982886:C:T p.R103W rs940936590 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 36361 2.20E-04 2.75E-05 72706 0
 Known MAPT chr17:46024061:C:T p.R406W rs63750424 4 1.89E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.44E-04 0 9 36361 2.48E-04 9.63E-05 72704 0
 Novel APP chr21:25905048:C:T p.D516N rs368159818 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 36361 2.20E-04 2.75E-05 72706 0
 Novel APP chr21:25982424:G:A p.P251S rs752243493 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 36361 3.30E-04 1.38E-05 72698 0
 Novel APP chr21:26021912:C:T p.A209T rs754672142 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 36361 3.85E-04 1.38E-05 72694 1 PSP
Controls
Variant status Gene Position Protein change rs ID Number of Controls AF i n Controls (n=16217) AF(AAC)-Controls (n=1563) AF (AMR)-C ontrols (n=3967) AF(FIN)-Controls (n=12) AF(CAS)-Controls (n=131) AF(MDE)-Controls (n=9) AF (APR)-Controls (n=1685) AF(EAS)-Controls (n=29) AF(AJ)-Controls (n=459) AF(SAS)-Controls (n=2279) AF(EUR)-Controls (n=4411) AF(CAH)-Controls (n=1672) MISSING_CT OBS_CT F_MISS ALT_FRE QS OBS_CT
AoU
 Known APP chr21: 25891796:C:T p.A713T rs63750066 2 6.17E-05 0 1.26E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.13E-04 0 11 36361 3.03E-04 8.25E-05 72700
 Known PSEN1 chr14:73170945:C:T p.A79V rs63749824 1 3.08E-05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.13E-04 0 8 36361 2.20E-04 1.24E-04 72706
 Novel APP chr21:25911860:A:C p.L597W rs765301301 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 36361 5.50E-05 4.13E-05 72718
 Novel MAPT chr17:46018716:G:A p.G701R rs948573449 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 36361 1.65E-04 1.38E-05 72710
 Novel MAPT chr17:46024088:G:A p.G750S rs768841567 1 3.08E-05 0 1.26E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 36361 4.40E-04 2.75E-05 72690
 Novel SNCA chr4:89822256:T:C p.Q99R rs757477802 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
100KGP 5 36361 1.38E-04 2.75E-05 72712
 Known PSEN1 chr14:73198067:G:A p.R269H rs63750900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 36361 2.48E-04 1.10E-04 72704
 Novel PSEN2 chr1:226891349:G:A p.D320N rs565698726 5 1.54E-04 3.20E-04 1.26E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.13E-04 5.98E-04 15 36361 4.13E-04 6.88E-05 72692
 Novel APP chr21:25954665:A:G p.Y407H rs779792929 1 3.08E-05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.13E-04 0 7 36361 1.93E-04 5.50E-05 70708
UKB
 Known GBA chr1:155238228:A:G p.W223R rs61748906 1 3.08E-05 0 0 0 0 0 2.97E-04 0 0 0 0 0 7 36361 1.93E-04 5.50E-05 72708
 Novel PSEN2 chr1:226891817:G:A p.G349R rs759669954 1 3.08E-05 0 1.26E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 36361 4.13E-04 1.38E-05 72692
 Known PSEN1 chr14:73170945:C:T p.A79V rs63749824 1 3.08E-05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.13E-04 0 8 36361 2.20E-04 1.24E-04 72706
 Novel PSEN1 chr14:73192754:G:A p.R220Q rs763831389 1 3.08E-05 3.20E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 36361 1.65E-04 5.50E-05 72710
 Known PSEN1 chr14:73198067:G:A p.R269H rs63750900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 36361 2.48E-04 1.10E-04 72704
 Novel PSEN1 chr14:73206388:A:G p.T291A rs63750298 3 9.25E-05 0 1.26E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.98E-04 5 36361 1.38E-04 6.88E-05 72712
 Novel PSEN1 chr14:73219194:A:G p.I437V rs764971634 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36361 0 1.38E-05 72722
 Novel PSEN1 chr14:73219254:A:G p.M457V rs1430581353 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 36361 5.50E-05 1.38E-05 72718
 Novel GRN chr17:44352395:G:A p.V490M rs886053006 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 36361 3.58E-04 1.38E-05 72696
 Known GRN chr17:44352404:C:T p.R493X rs63751294 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 36361 5.50E-04 6.88E-05 72682
 Novel MAPT chr17:45978420:C:G p.A60G rs139796158 7 2.16E-04 3.23E-04 0 0 0 0 6.00E-04 0 0 0 0 1.21E-03 416 36361 1.14E-02 1.67E-04 71890
 Novel MAPT chr17:45982886:C:T p.R103W rs940936590 1 3.08E-05 0 1.26E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 36361 2.20E-04 2.75E-05 72706
 Known MAPT chr17:46024061:C:T p.R406W rs63750424 1 3.08E-05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.13E-04 0 9 36361 2.48E-04 9.63E-05 72704
 Novel APP chr21:25905048:C:T p.D516N rs368159818 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 36361 2.20E-04 2.75E-05 72706
 Novel APP chr21:25982424:G:A p.P251S rs752243493 1 3.08E-05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.20E-04 0 0 12 36361 3.30E-04 1.38E-05 72698
 Novel APP chr21:26021912:C:T p.A209T rs754672142 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 36361 3.85E-04 1.38E-05 72694

Key: AF, allele frequency; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; PSP, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy; MCI, Mild Cognitive Impairment; DLB, Dementia with Lewy bodies; n, Number of individuals; MISSING_CT, Missing Count; OBS_CT, Observed Count; F_MISS, Fraction Missing; ALT_FREQS, Alternate Allele Frequencies; Position refers to GRCh 38.

Among the three variants identified in the 100KGP dataset that were replicated in the ADSP cohort, PSEN1 p.R269H was previously reported while PSEN2 p.D320N and APP p.Y407H were novel. We observed the previously reported PSEN1 p.R269H variant in five cases and no control participants. This variant was found in European ancestry individuals from the 100KGP cohort and was also observed in individuals of African Admixed ancestry (two cases) and European ancestry (three cases) in the ADSP dataset. Of the novel variants, the PSEN2 p.D320N variant was found in five controls and was not observed in any cases, while the APP p.Y407H variant was observed in two cases and one control. Searching for additional cases led to the discovery of PSEN1 p.R269H in a patient with MCI.

Among the 16 variants identified in the UKB cohort that were replicated in the ADSP dataset, five variants — PSEN1 p.A79V (five cases and one control), PSEN1 p.R269H (five cases), GRN p.R493X (three cases), MAPT p.R406W (four cases and one control), and GBA1 p.W223R (one case and one control) — have been previously reported. The remaining 11 variants were novel. Most of the novel variants were found in European cases in the UKB. The PSEN1 p.R269H variant was found in cases of both African Admixed and European ancestries, and GBA1 p.W223R was found in a case of Complex Admixture History ancestry and a control of African ancestry. The three remaining known variants were observed in individuals of European ancestry in the ADSP cohort. Novel variants identified in non-European participants include PSEN1 p.R220Q (one African case, two European cases, and one African Admixed control), PSEN1 p.T291A (one African Admixed case, one American Admixed control, and two controls with Complex Admixture History), MAPT p.A60G (two African Admixed cases, one African Admixed control, two African controls, and four controls with Complex Admixture History), GRN p.V490M (one African Admixed case), MAPT p.R103W (one American Admixed control), and APP p.P251S (one South Asian control). Searching for other cases resulted in the identification of PSEN1 p.A79V in one possible AD patient, PSEN1 p.R269H and MAPT p.A60G in two independent MCI patients, and GBA1 p.W223R and APP p.A209T in two independent PSP patients (Table 3).

We identified a novel SNCA variant (p.Q99R) in the AoU dataset, while the UKB dataset revealed two additional variants in SNCA: p.P90H and p.A91S. Both p.P90H and p.A91S were predicted to be likely pathogenic according to prediction estimates and have not been previously reported as disease-causing. Notably, the SNCA p.Q99R variant was replicated in the ADSP cohort. All three variants were heterozygous, and none of these variants were found in any controls across these datasets. However, the age at onset of these variant carriers is not consistent with a potential disease-causing deleterious effect.

Our analyses of multiple datasets identified 11 variants (three from AoU, seven from UKB, and one from 100KGP) that were absent in the ADSP control cohort.

Across each of our discovery datasets, we identified five candidate variants — APP p.A713T, MAPT p.G750S, GRN p.V490M, GRN p.R493X, and APP p.D516N — present in AMP PD. GRN p.V490M was present in one control and no cases, GRN p.R493X was present in one case and no controls, while the other three were present across both cases and controls. The allele frequencies of these variants are detailed in Table 4.

Table 4-.

Replication phase: potential disease-causing variants only present in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia cases in AMP PD

Cases
Variant status Gene Position rs ID Number of DLB Cases AF in DLB Cases (n=2530) AF(AAC)-DLB (n=0) AF(AMR)-DLB (n=0) AF(FIN)-DLB (n=5) AF(CAS)-DLB (n=0) AF(MDE)-DLB (n=6) AF(AFR)-DLB (n=0) AF(EAS)-DLB (n=0) AF(AJ)-DLB (n=113) AF(SAS)-DLB (n=0) AF(EUR)-DLB (n=2406) AF(CAH)-DLB (n=0)
AoU
 Known APP chr21: 25891796:C:T rs63750066 1 1.98E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.08E-04 0
 Novel MAPT chr17:46024088:G:A rs768841567 1 1.98E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.08E-04 0
UKB
 Novel GRN chr17:44352395:G:A rs886053006 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 Known GRN chr17:44352404:C:T rs63751294 1 1.98E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.08E-04 0
 Novel APP chr21:25905048:C:T rs368159818 1 1.98E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.08E-04 0
Controls
Variant status Gene Position rs ID Number of Controls AF in Controls (n=3270) AF(AAC)-Controls (n=40) AF(AMR)-Controls (n=14) AF(FIN)-Controls (n=5) AF(CAS)-Controls (n=3) AF(MDE)-Controls (n=4) AF(AFR)-Controls (n=29) AF(EAS)-Controls (n=5) AF(AJ)-Controls (n=246) AF(SAS)-Controls (n=1) AF(EUR)-Controls (n=2919) AF(CAH)-Controls (n=4)
AoU
 Known APP chr21: 25891796:C:T rs63750066 1 1.53E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.71E-04 0
 Novel MAPT chr17:46024088:G:A rs768841567 1 1.53E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.71E-04 0
UKB
 Novel GRN chr17:44352395:G:A rs886053006 1 1.53E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.71E-04 0
 Known GRN chr17:44352404:C:T rs63751294 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 Novel APP chr21:25905048:C:T rs368159818 1 1.53E-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.71E-04 0

Key: UKB, UK Biobank; AMP PD, Accelerating Medicines Partnership in Parkinson’s Disease ; AoU, All of Us; Position refers to GRCh 38.

Among the 116 variants identified in this study, 13 were found exclusively in non-European ancestries. Notably, APP:p.L597W and MAPT:p.A60G were replicated in African and African Admixed ancestries across different datasets. These data highlight the potential significance of these variants in groups that are often underrepresented in genomic studies.

Supplementary Figure 2 shows the allele frequencies of all identified known and novel variants with CADD > 20 in the discovery and replication phases across all ancestries in each biobank.

Previously reported disease-causing variants raise questions about potential pathogenicity

Although the SNCA p.H50Q variant was initially identified as a pathogenic mutation in PD [30], subsequent research has challenged its pathogenicity [31]. Our study confirms that it is not pathogenic across other synucleinopathies such as DLB, based on its occurrence in five European controls in AoU and 28 European controls in UKB.

Additionally, several research studies have reported the APP p.A713T variant to be disease-causing [32,33]. In our study, we found this variant in heterozygous state in five control individuals: two in UKB, two in ADSP, and one in AMP PD. Interestingly, the APP p.E665D variant, which has been widely reported to cause AD [34,35], was found in one control in AoU in her late 70s. However, it is possible that the variant shows incomplete penetrance, or that this individual may harbor unidentified resilient genetic variation. Another previous study evaluating the role of APP p.E665D questioned the pathogenicity of this variant [36].

GBA1 coding variants in heterozygous state generally exhibit incomplete penetrance and act as genetic risk factors. Homozygous GBA1 variants, including the p.T75del and c.115+1G>A mutations have been reported to cause Gaucher disease [3740]. We found these two variants in a heterozygous state in one case and one control in AoU. GBA1 p.T75del was found in individuals of African ancestry, and GBA1 c.115+1G>A was found in individuals of European ancestry in both a case and a control. The GBA1 c.115+1G>A variant was also found in nine European controls in the UKB cohort. Thirteen additional heterozygous variants in GBA1 — p.R502C, p.A495P, p.L483R, p.D448H, p.E427X, p.G416S, p.N409S, p.R398X, p.R296Q, p.G241R, p.N227S, p.S212X, and p.R159W — were identified in our study, and have been reported as disease-causing for Gaucher disease in homozygous state. Three variants in GRN, including two loss of function variants (including p.Q130fs and p.Y294X) and one splicing variant (c.708+6_708+9del), have been previously reported to cause FTD, FTLD, and neurodegenerative disease [37,4155]. Each of these 16 variants were found in several control individuals (Supplementary Table 4).

Genetic-phenotypic correlations provide valuable clinical insights

Clinical data for the identified variants are summarized in Supplementary Tables 5 and 6. Here, we briefly explain the main findings.

The GRN p.R493X variant is this gene’s most reported pathogenic mutation. This variant has been associated with several types of dementia, including FTD, FTLD, primary progressive aphasia, AD, and corticobasal degeneration. It is known to be more frequently identified among FTD cases, particularly in early-onset forms [56]. In one study investigating the genetics underlying disease etiology in 1,118 DLB patients, this variant was reported in a single case, presenting a wide range of neurological phenotypes that could not lead to a conclusive diagnosis. Severe dementia, parkinsonism, and visual hallucinations suggested a clinical diagnosis of AD or mixed vascular dementia. However, the final neuropathological diagnosis was suggested to be AD, DLB, and argyrophilic grain disease [57]. We identified this variant in four European AD patients, three of whom presented with early onset in their fifties. Interestingly, we also identified this variant in a DLB patient in her early 60s. Neuropathological data and McKeith criteria [58] strongly supported a diagnosis of DLB in this patient. Although this variant has been widely reported across different types of dementia, our finding is the first report of this variant in DLB with a McKeith criteria of “high likelihood of DLB,” expanding the etiological spectrum of GRN variation (Supplementary Table 5).

GRN p.C222Y was previously reported in a familial AD case from Latin American (Caribbean Hispanic) ancestry [59,60]. While the AAO for this patient was not reported, the mean AAO for the cohorts under study was 56.9 years (SD = 7.29), with a range between 40–73 years. In our study, we identified this variant in an individual of American Admixed ancestry with dementia in his late 40s and a disease duration of 11 years to date. This finding reinforces the role of this variant in early-onset disease.

There are several other interesting findings regarding variants in GRN. The GRN c.708+1G>A variant was previously reported in several FTD, FTLD, and corticobasal syndrome (CBS) cases, mostly early-onset [55,61]. We identified this variant in two European AD cases, both diagnosed in their 70s, marking the first report of this variant in late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD). The GRN p.P166fsX variant was previously reported in an early-onset behavioral variant FTD case [62]. In our study, we identified this variant in a European dementia case diagnosed in her mid 70s with a disease duration of 8 years to date. The GRN p.R418X variant is identified in the literature in two cases of FTLD with ubiquitin-positive inclusions (FTLD-U) with an AAO of 49 and 60 years [63]. We identified this variant in a European dementia case in her early 70s. Both findings represent the first report of these variants in late-onset dementia.

PSEN1 R269H is a known pathogenic variant causing early-onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) [64,65]. However, it has been previously reported in only two LOAD cases [66,67]. In our study, we identified this variant in European and African Admixed ancestries in a total of 12 cases (eight AD and four related dementias), six of which were early-onset (≤65 years) and six were late-onset (>65 years). This finding underscores the potential for PSEN1 p.R269H to contribute to LOAD with reduced penetrance. Additionally, one EOAD case that presented with hallucinations [68] and another that manifested a behavioral presentation [69] have been reported to carry this variant. In this study, we identified PSEN1 p.R269H in one FTD patient in the 100KGP cohort, marking the first report of this variant in FTD.

MAPT p.R406W has been reported in several familial cases of FTD with parkinsonism, all with early onset [70]. There are only two articles related to this variant in AD. The first describes a family with AD-like symptoms, with an average AAO of 61 years [71], and the other reports a familial AD case with an AAO of 50 years [72]. In our study, we identified this variant in nine AD cases, with a mean AAO of 61 years. This finding underscores the role of this variant in EOAD.

Several variants in GBA1, such as p.F298L, p.V230G, p.W223R, and p.P198L, have been previously reported in Gaucher disease patients. In our study, we identified these variants in heterozygous state in one AD case and five dementia cases, all with late onset. GBA1 p.W223R was found in one AD case of Complex Admixture History ancestry. GBA1 mutations are known to confer an increased risk for dementia in PD and DLB. Notably, they have not been previously suggested to contribute to AD.

Similarly, APP p.E693Q has been reported in a few AD cases. In our study, we identified it in a related dementia case and no controls. This finding suggests that this variant may also be implicated in other types of dementia.

Several known variants identified in this study confirm previous findings related to disease type and onset. For example, the APP p.V717L variant has been reported in numerous AD cases, primarily in early-onset forms [73,74]. In our study, we identified this variant in two cases of EOAD with AAO ranges of 51–55 years and 56–60 years, respectively. Additional examples are reported in Supplementary Tables 5 and 6.

In AoU, the SNCA p.Q99R variant was found in a female patient diagnosed in her late 60s with unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance. In ADSP, the variant was identified in a male patient diagnosed with pure AD in his early 70s. SNCA p.P90H and p.A91S were found in two males in their late 70s in the UKB cohort. All four patients were of European ancestry. Previously reported mutations in SNCA are known to cause early-onset PD and DLB [75,76]. The mean AAO in patients carrying SNCA mutations in this study is 72.75 years. These data suggest that these variants may not be disease-causing but could represent rare risk factors despite their absence in controls and the replication of p.Q99R across datasets.

Novel variants found in this study that may potentially be associated with early-onset dementia include: p.L597W, p.V375I, p.L364F, p.A209T, p.D460N, p.R409C, and p.V227L variants in APP; p.R54X and p.M457V in PSEN1; p.H169R, p.D320N, and p.G349R in PSEN2; p.R556C and p.V28fs in GRN; p.G332LfsX64 and p.G701R in MAPT; p.G103D and p.A42T in GBA1; and TREM2 p.W44X. Among these variants, APP p.L364F and PSEN1 p.R54X were found in vascular dementia cases with AAO ranges of 41–45 years and 46–50 years, respectively. Additionally, PSEN2 p.D320N was found in an FTD case with an AAO in his mid-50s. Another notable finding is the identification of GRN p.R556C in a dementia case with an AAO in her mid-30s.

APOE drives different population-attributable risk for Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias

The summary of our findings on ancestry-specific effects of APOE on AD/ADRDs is depicted in Figure 4, Table 5, and Supplementary Figure 3. In AoU, UKB, and 100KGP, the APOE ε4/ε4 genotype exhibits a higher frequency among both AD patients and control individuals of African and African Admixed ancestries compared to Europeans. Related dementia patients show similar results in UKB. In AoU, related dementia cases of African Admixed ancestry show a higher frequency than Europeans, while frequencies are similar between Africans and Europeans, likely due to the limited number of individuals with African ancestry in this dataset. In ADSP, the frequencies of this genotype among AD patients are similar across the three ancestries. Among control individuals in ADSP, APOE ε4/ε4 is more frequent in African Admixed and African ancestries than in Europeans, as previously reported [77]. Notably, the APOE ε4/ε4 genotype was absent from African and African Admixed DLB cases and controls in the AMP PD dataset. The frequency of APOE ε4/ε4 in Europeans was higher in cases compared to controls in AMP PD.

Figure 4-.

Figure 4-

Proportions of APOE ε4/ε4 across 11 genetic ancestries in Alzheimer’s disease, related dementias, and controls in all datasets.

Table 5-.

Multi-ancestry summary of APOE genotypes in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia cases and controls in AoU, ADSP, UKB, AMP PD and 100KGP

AoU
AD
Genotypes Number of participants (n, %) EUR (n, %) AFR (n, %) AMR (n, %) EAS (n, %) SAS (n, %) MDE (n, %) AJ (n, %) FIN (n, %) AAC (n, %) CAS (n, %) CAH (n, %)
ε1/ε1 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε2 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε4 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε2 3, 0.55% 2, 0.6% 1, 3.12% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε3 46, 8.53% 26, 7.80% 2, 6.25% 4, 5.63% 2, 28.57% 0, 0% 0, 0% 5, 10% 0, 0% 7, 17.07% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε4 or ε1/ε3 11, 2.04% 5, 1.50% 2, 6.25% 1, 1.40% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 1, 2% 0, 0% 2, 4.87% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε3/ε3 281, 52.13% 171, 51.35% 13, 40.62% 46, 64.78% 2, 28.57% 1, 50% 1, 100% 26, 52% 0, 0% 20, 48.78% 1, 50% 0, 0%
ε3/ε4 158, 29.31% 106, 31.83% 9, 28.12% 19, 26.76% 3, 42.85% 0, 0% 0, 0% 11, 22% 0, 0% 9, 21.95% 1, 50% 0, 0%
ε4/ε4 40, 7.42% 23, 6.90% 5, 15.62% 1, 1.40% 0, 0% 1, 50% 0, 0% 7, 14% 0, 0% 3, 7.31% 0, 0% 0, 0%
Total 539 333 32 71 7 2 1 50 0 41 2 0
Dementia
Genotypes Number of participants (n, %) EUR (n, %) AFR (n, %) AMR (n, %) EAS (n, %) SAS (n, %) MDE (n, %) AJ (n, %) FIN (n, %) AAC (n, %) CAS (n, %) CAH (n, %)
00_CC, unknown 1, 0.06% 1, 0.09% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε1 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε2 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε4 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε2 12, 0.72% 7, 0.71% 1, 0.57% 2, 0.93% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 1, 0.97% 0, 0% 1, 0.69% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε3 162, 9.78% 88, 9.02% 24, 13.71% 19, 8.87% 4, 21.05% 1, 10% 0, 0% 8, 7.76% 0, 0% 18, 12.5% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε4 or ε1/ε3 38, 2.29% 17, 1.74% 12, 6.85% 1, 0.46% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 2, 1.94% 0, 0% 6, 4.16% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε3/ε3 912, 55.10% 551, 56.51% 77, 44% 130, 60.74% 10, 52.63% 7, 70% 6, 100% 60, 58.25% 2, 100% 66, 45.83% 3, 42.85% 0, 0%
ε3/ε4 449, 27.12% 266, 27.28% 53, 30.28% 54, 25.23% 5, 26.31% 1, 10% 0, 0% 22, 21.35% 0, 0% 45, 31.25% 3, 42.85% 0, 0%
ε4/ε4 81, 4.89% 45, 4.61% 8, 4.57% 8, 3.73% 0, 0% 1, 10% 0, 0% 10, 9.70% 0, 0% 8, 5.55% 1, 14.28% 0, 0%
Total 1655 975 175 214 19 10 6 103 2 144 7 0
Controls
Genotypes Number of participants (n, %) EUR (n, %) AFR (n, %) AMR (n, %) EAS (n, %) SAS (n, %) MDE (n, %) AJ (n, %) FIN (n, %) AAC (n, %) CAS (n, %) CAH (n, %)
CT_00, unknown 1, 0.007% 1, 0.01% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
00_CC, unknown 1, 0.007% 1, 0.01% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε1 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε2 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε4 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε2 90, 0.65% 51, 0.57% 18, 1.37% 4, 0.3% 3, 0.81% 0, 0% 0, 0% 6, 0.68% 0, 0% 8, 0.89% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε3 1734, 12.53% 1124, 12.65% 220, 16.85% 82, 6.28% 61, 16.66% 5, 6.84% 13, 19.69% 113, 12.94% 3, 10.71% 108, 12.02% 5, 11.90% 0, 0%
ε2/ε4 or ε1/ε3 295, 2.13% 168, 1.89% 66, 5.05% 11, 0.84% 1, 0.27% 1, 1.36% 2, 3.03% 10, 1.14% 0, 0% 36, 4.00% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε3/ε3 8537, 61.70% 5597, 63.02% 587, 44.98% 927, 71.08% 252, 68.85% 51, 69.86% 46, 69.69% 575, 65.86% 20, 71.42% 453, 50.44% 29, 69.04% 0, 0%
ε3/ε4 2930, 21.17% 1817, 20.46% 349, 26.74% 265, 20.32% 48, 13.11% 16, 21.91% 5, 7.57% 160, 18.32% 4, 14.28% 259, 28.84% 7, 16.66% 0, 0%
ε4/ε4 247, 1.78% 121, 1.36% 65, 4.98% 15, 1.15% 1, 0.27% 0, 0% 0, 0% 9, 1.03% 1, 3.57% 34, 3.78% 1, 2.38% 0, 0%
Total 13835 8880 1305 1304 366 73 66 873 28 898 42 0
ADSP
AD
Genotypes Number of participants (n, %) EUR (n, %) AFR (n, %) AMR (n, %) EAS (n, %) SAS (n, %) MDE (n, %) AJ (n, %) FIN (n, %) AAC (n, %) CAS (n, %) CAH (n, %)
00_00, unknown 45, 0.42% 44, 0.75% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 1, 0.18% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
00_CC, unknown 17, 0.16% 10, 0.17% 3, 0.45% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 1, 0.18% 0, 0% 2, 0.17% 0, 0% 1, 0.09%
00_TC, unknown 1, 0.00000095% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 1, 0.18% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
TT_00, unknown 7, 0.06% 7, 0.12% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
CT_00, unknown 22, 0.20% 22, 0.37% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
CC_00, unknown 9, 0.08% 9, 0.15% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε1 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε2 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε4 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε2 21, 0.19% 7, 0.12% 4, 0.60% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 2, 0.37% 0, 0% 5, 0.44% 0, 0% 3, 0.28%
ε2/ε3 479, 4.53% 177, 3.04% 47, 7.07% 38, 3.49% 3, 6% 15, 8.52% 1, 3.70% 18, 3.35% 0, 0% 108, 9.65% 2, 10% 70, 6.57%
ε2/ε4 or ε1/ε3 251, 2.37% 129, 2.21% 32, 4.81% 9, 0.82% 1, 2% 4, 2.27% 0, 0% 11, 2.04% 0, 0% 41, 3.66% 1, 5% 23, 2.16%
ε3/ε3 4296, 40.65% 2070, 35.61% 210, 31.62% 686, 63.16% 24, 48% 112, 63.63% 16, 59.25% 241, 44.87% 3, 27.27% 377, 33.69% 9, 45% 548, 51.50%
ε3/ε4 4263, 40.34% 2596, 44.66% 285, 42.92% 301, 27.71% 16, 32% 43, 24.43% 8, 29.62% 222, 41.34% 4, 36.36% 443, 39.58% 7, 35% 338, 31.76%
ε4/ε4 1155, 10.93% 741, 12.74% 83, 12.5% 52, 4, 78% 6, 12% 2, 1.13% 2, 7.40% 40, 7.44% 4, 36.36% 143, 12.77% 1, 5% 81, 7.61%
Total 10566 5812 664 1086 50 176 27 537 11 1119 20 1064
Controls
Genotypes Number of participants (n, %) EUR (n, %) AFR (n, %) AMR (n, %) EAS (n, %) SAS (n, %) MDE (n, %) AJ (n, %) FIN (n, %) AAC (n, %) CAS (n, %) CAH (n, %)
00_00, unknown 124, 0.76% 120, 2.72% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 1, 0.06% 0, 0% 3, 0.17%
00_CC, unknown 21, 0.12% 13, 0.29% 2, 0.11% 1, 0.02% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 4, 0.25% 0, 0% 1, 0.05
00_TC, unknown 3, 0.01% 2, 0.04% 1, 0.05% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
TT_00, unknown 5, 0.03% 3, 0.06% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 1, 0.21% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 1, 0.05
CT_00, unknown 83, 0.51% 82, 1.85% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 1, 0.21% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
CC_00, unknown 8, 0.04% 8, 0.18% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε1 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε2 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε4 1, 0.006% 0, 0% 1, 0.05% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε2 71, 0.43% 18, 0.40% 22, 1.30% 5, 0.12% 0, 0% 3, 0.13% 0, 0% 1, 0.21% 0, 0% 15, 0.95% 2, 1.52% 5, 0.29%
ε2/ε3 1528, 9.42% 418, 9.47% 244, 14.48% 217, 5.47% 5, 17.24% 175, 7.67% 1, 11.11% 47, 10.23% 3, 25% 235, 15.03% 18, 13.74% 165, 9.86%
ε2/ε4 or ε1/ε3 293, 1.80% 68, 1.54% 78, 4.62% 28, 0.70% 1, 3.44% 25, 1.09% 0, 0% 4, 0.87% 0, 0% 61, 3.90% 1, 0.76% 27, 1.61%
ε3/ε3 10197, 62.87% 2540, 57.58% 777, 46.11% 3008, 75.82% 12, 41.37% 1649, 72.35% 6, 66.66% 270, 58.82% 5, 41.66% 765, 48.94% 86, 65.64% 1079, 64.53%
ε3/ε4 3544, 21.85% 1026, 23.26% 494, 29.31% 672, 16.93% 8, 27.58% 398, 17.46% 2, 22.22% 128, 27.88% 4, 33.33% 435, 27.83% 20, 15.26% 357, 21.35%
ε4/ε4 339, 2.09% 113, 2.56% 66, 3.91% 36, 0.90% 3, 10.34% 29, 1.27% 0, 0% 7, 1.52% 0, 0% 47, 3.00% 4, 3.05% 34, 2.03%
Total 16217 4411 1685 3967 29 2279 9 459 12 1563 131 1672
UKB
AD
Genotypes Number of participants (n, %) EUR (n, %) AFR (n, %) AMR (n, %) EAS (n, %) SAS (n, %) MDE (n, %) AJ (n, %) FIN (n, %) AAC (n, %) CAS (n, %) CAH (n, %)
ε1/ε1 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε2 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε4 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε2 9, 0.21% 8, 0.20% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 1, 11.11% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε3 212, 5.02% 205, 5.06% 5, 9.62% 0, 0% 0, 0% 1, 2.04% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 1, 8.33% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε4 or ε1/ε3 102, 0.02% 97, 2.39% 5, 9.62% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε3/ε3 1391, 32.92% 1321, 32.61% 11, 21.15% 0, 0% 5, 71.43% 25, 51.02% 6, 66.67% 10, 37.04% 0, 0% 1, 8.33% 6, 60% 6, 75%
ε3/ε4 1931, 45.70% 1867, 46.09% 18, 34.62% 0, 0% 2, 28.57% 20, 40.82% 1, 11.11% 15, 55.56% 0, 0% 3, 25% 3, 30% 2, 25%
ε4/ε4 580, 13.73% 553, 13.65% 13, 25% 0, 0% 0, 0% 3, 6.12% 1, 11.11% 2, 7.41% 0, 0% 7, 58.33% 1, 10% 0, 0%
total 4225 4051 52 0 7 49 9 27 0 12 10 8
Dementia
Genotypes Number of participants (n, %) EUR (n, %) AFR (n, %) AMR (n, %) EAS (n, %) SAS (n, %) MDE (n, %) AJ (n, %) FIN (n, %) AAC (n, %) CAS (n, %) CAH (n, %)
ε1/ε1 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε2 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε4 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε2 24, 0.45% 23, 0.46% 1, 1.56% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε3 447, 8.42% 427, 8.49% 6, 9.38% 0, 0% 2, 20% 6, 8.57% 2, 15.38% 2, 4.65% 0, 0% 1, 4.17% 1, 4.35% 0, 0%
ε2/ε4 or ε1/ε3 165, 3.11% 153, 3.04% 4, 6.25% 0, 0% 1, 10% 1, 1.43% 0, 0% 1, 2.33% 0, 0% 3, 12.50% 0, 0% 2, 7.41%
ε3/ε3 2432, 45.83% 2291, 45.56% 23, 35.94% 2, 66.67% 6, 60% 38, 54.29% 10, 76.92% 26, 60.47% 0, 0% 8, 33.33% 15, 65.22% 13, 48.15%
ε3/ε4 1832, 34.53% 1748, 34.77% 22, 34.38% 1, 33.33% 1, 10% 21, 30% 1, 7.69% 13, 30.23% 1, 100% 7, 29.17% 6, 26.09% 11, 40.74%
ε4/ε4 406, 7.65% 386, 7.68% 8, 12.50% 0, 0% 0, 0% 4, 5.71% 0, 0% 1, 2.33% 0, 0% 5, 20.83% 1, 4.35% 1, 3.70%
total 5306 5028 64 3 10 70 13 43 1 24 23 27
Controls
Genotypes Number of participants (n, %) EUR (n, %) AFR (n, %) AMR (n, %) EAS (n, %) SAS (n, %) MDE (n, %) AJ (n, %) FIN (n, %) AAC (n, %) CAS (n, %) CAH (n, %)
ε1/ε1 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε2 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε4 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε2 367, 0.65% 358, 0.66% 3, 0.67% 0, 0% 1, 0.65% 1, 0.15% 0, 0% 2, 0.48% 0, 0% 0, 0% 1, 0.49% 1, 0.59%
ε2/ε3 7416, 13.07% 7167, 13.17% 67, 15.06% 4, 8.33% 18, 11.69% 51, 7.59% 5, 8.06% 38, 9.13% 3, 20% 29, 21.80% 16, 7.84% 18, 10.65%
ε2/ε4 or ε1/ε3 1300, 2.29% 1231, 2.26% 29, 6.52% 0, 0% 2, 1.30% 8, 1.19% 0, 0% 11, 2.64% 0, 0% 9, 6.77% 4, 1.96% 6, 3.55%
ε3/ε3 34770, 61.28% 33277, 61.15% 193, 43.37% 33, 68.75% 103, 66.88% 508, 75.60% 50, 80.65% 284, 68.27% 10, 66.67% 56, 42.11% 153, 75% 103, 60.95%
ε3/ε4 11946, 21.05% 11491, 21.11% 136, 30.56% 11, 22.92% 28, 18.18% 95, 14.14% 6, 9.68% 78, 18.75% 2, 13.33% 33, 24.81% 29, 14.22% 37, 21.89%
ε4/ε4 942, 1.66% 899, 1.65% 17, 3.82% 0, 0% 2, 1.30% 9, 1.34% 1, 1.61% 3, 0.72% 0, 0% 6, 4.51% 1, 0.49% 4, 2.37%
total 56741 54423 445 48 154 672 62 416 15 133 204 169
AMP PD
DLB
Genotypes Number of participants (n, %) EUR (n, %) AFR (n, %) AMR (n, %) EAS (n, %) SAS (n, %) MDE (n, %) AJ (n, %) FIN (n, %) AAC (n, %) CAS (n, %) CAH (n, %)
unknown,unknown 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε1 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε2 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε4 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε2 5, 0.20% 5, 0.21% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε3 191, 7.55% 179, 7.44% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 12, 10.62% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε4 or ε1/ε3 84, 3.32% 78, 3.24% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 6, 5.31% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε3/ε3 1162, 45.93% 1108, 46.05% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 3, 50% 48, 42.48% 3, 60% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε3/ε4 882, 34.86% 842, 35% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 3, 50% 35, 30.97% 2, 40% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε4/ε4 206, 8.14% 194, 8.06% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 12, 10.62% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
total 2530 2406 0 0 0 0 6 113 5 0 0 0
Controls
Genotypes Number of participants (n, %) EUR (n, %) AFR (n, %) AMR (n, %) EAS (n, %) SAS (n, %) MDE (n, %) AJ (n, %) FIN (n, %) AAC (n, %) CAS (n, %) CAH (n, %)
unknown,unknown 4, 0.12% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 1, 100% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 3, 100% 0, 0%
ε1/ε1 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε2 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε1/ε4 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε2 13, 0.40% 11, 0.38% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 1, 0.41% 0, 0% 1, 2.50% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε2/ε3 352, 10.76% 310, 10.62% 4, 13.79% 1, 7.14% 1, 20% 0, 0% 0, 0% 31, 12.60% 0, 0% 4, 10% 0, 0% 1, 25%
ε2/ε4 or ε1/ε3 49, 1.50% 40, 1.37% 1, 3.45% 1, 7.14% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 7, 2.85% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε3/ε3 2100, 64.22% 1885, 64.58% 19, 65.52% 9, 64.29% 3, 60% 0, 0% 4, 100% 146, 59.35% 5, 100% 26, 65% 0, 0% 3, 75%
ε3/ε4 698, 21.34% 620, 21.24% 5, 17.24% 3, 21.43% 1, 20% 0, 0% 0, 0% 60, 24.39% 0, 0% 9, 22.50% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε4/ε4 54, 1.65% 53, 1.82% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 1, 0.41% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
total 3270 2919 29 14 5 1 4 246 5 40 3 4
100KGP
Dementia
Genotypes Number of participants (n, %) EUR (n, %) AFR (n, %) AMR (n, %) EAS (n, %) SAS (n, %) NA (n, %)
NA 10, 5.55% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 10, 100%
ε2/ε3 11, 6.11% 9, 6.29% 1, 14.28% 0, 0% 0, 0% 1, 6.25% 0, 0%
ε2/ε4 or ε1/ε3 3, 1.67% 3, 2.10% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
ε3/ε3 69, 38.33% 58, 40.56% 1, 14.28% 2, 66.67% 1, 100% 7, 43.75% 0, 0%
ε3/ε4 66, 36.67% 54, 37.76% 4, 57.14% 0, 0% 0, 0% 8, 50% 0, 0%
ε4/ε4 21, 11.67% 19, 13.29% 1, 14.28% 1, 33.33% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
Total 180 143 7 3 1 16 10
Controls
Genotypes Number of participants (n, %) EUR (n, %) AFR (n, %) AMR (n, %) EAS (n, %) SAS (n, %) NA (n, %)
NA 31, 0.89% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 31, 100%
ε2/ε2 25, 0.71% 22, 0.72% 1, 1.61% 1, 1.16% 0, 0% 1, 0.41% 0, 0%
ε2/ε3 436, 12.53% 394, 12.97% 7, 11.29% 9, 10.46% 4, 18.18% 22, 9.12% 0, 0%
ε2/ε4 or ε1/ε3 72, 2.06% 61, 2.00% 6, 9.67% 1, 1.16% 1, 4.54% 3, 1.24% 0, 0%
ε3/ε3 2042, 58.69% 1765, 58.11% 25, 40.32% 61, 70.93% 14, 63.63% 177, 73.44% 0, 0%
ε3/ε4 802, 23.05% 729, 24.00% 20, 32.25% 13, 15.11% 3, 13.63% 37, 15.35% 0, 0%
ε4/ε4 71, 2.04% 66, 2.17% 3, 4.83% 1, 1.16% 0, 0% 1, 0.41% 0, 0%
Total 3479 3037 62 86 22 241 31

In 100KGP, genotypes that could not be detected are shown as NA. AD, Alzheimer’s disease; DLB, Dementia with Lewy bodies; 100KGP, 100,000 Genomes Project; ADSP, Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project;

UKB, UK Biobank; AMP PD, Accelerating Medicines Partnership in Parkinson’s Disease; AoU, All of Us; EUR, European; AFR, African; AMR, American Admixed; AAC,African Admixed; AJ, Ashkenazi Jewish; CAS, Central Asian; EAS, Eastern Asian; SAS, South Asian; MDE, Middle Eastern; FIN, Finnish; CAH, Complex Admixture History.

When combining results across all datasets, the frequency of APOE ε4/ε4 in African and African Admixed AD patients is still higher than in Europeans, but the values are not significantly different. However, the frequency of APOE ε4/ε4 in control individuals of African and African Admixed ancestries was found to be substantially higher than in controls of European ancestry. Additionally, the frequency of APOE ε4/ε4 in Finnish individuals was found to be higher in AD cases and lower in controls compared to Europeans.

Disease-modifying variants in APOE ε4 carriers modulate Alzheimer’s and dementia risk across different ancestries

The summary of our findings for the frequencies of protective and disease-modifying variants under study, alongside APOE genotypes across all five datasets, is depicted in Supplementary Tables 711. The proportions of individuals carrying APOE ε4 homozygous or heterozygous genotypes alongside protective or disease-modifying variants, within the total population, total ε4/ε4 carriers, and total ε4 carriers across each ancestry, combined across all biobanks, in AD, related dementias, and controls are reported in Figure 5, Supplementary Figure 4 and Supplementary Table 12. Summaries of our findings for all the assessed models in APOE ε4, ε4ε4, and ε3ε3 are shown in Figure 6, Table 6 and Supplementary Tables 1322.

Figure 5-. Proportions of individuals carrying both APOE ε4 and protective or diseasemodifying variants across 11 genetic ancestries in Alzheimer’s disease, related dementias, and controls in all datasets.

Figure 5-

(A) SNP frequencies for each variant within each ancestry relative to the total number of ε4 carriers per ancestry across all datasets. (B) AD-to-control allele frequency ratios (left) and related dementia-to-control ratios (right). Warmer colors represent higher frequencies in cases versus controls, while cooler colors represent higher frequencies in controls versus cases, with dark blue (N/A) representing variants not present in either cases or controls.

Figure 6-. Upset plot showing protective, conditional, and interaction models across multiple ancestries.

Figure 6-

The Y-axis represents each ancestry population with a large enough sample size, and the X-axis represents the six protective/disease-modifying variants. The color bar shows the magnitude of effects as log of the odds ratio (beta value) and directionality, with red color denoting negative directionality, and blue colors denoting positive directionality.

Table 6-.

Summary of the analysis of protective/disease-modifying variants in Alzheimer’s disease cases and controls in the ADSP

Protective_model <- glm(PHENO ~ Protective/disease-modifying variant + SEX + AGE + PC1 + PC2 + PC3 + PC4 + PC5, data = data, family = binomial)
19q13.31 : rs10423769, chr19:43100929:G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 A A A A A A A A A A A
P 0.460811 0.6021 0.215674 NA NA 0.789232 0.46266 NA 0.842912 NA 0.201781
OR (L95_U95) 0.79711 (0.436315_1.45625) 0.949949 (0.783198_1.1522) 1.26959 (0.870087_1.85251) NA NA 1.89966 (0.0171931_209.893) 0.807628 (0.456669_1.4283) NA 1.01806 (0.852894_1.21521) NA 0.848645 (0.659614_1.09185)
APOE:rs449647, Chr19:44905307: A>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 T T T T T T T T T T T
P 2.19e-14 6.62e-06 0.921403 0.410879 0.71756 0.126724 0.000246962 0.657878 0.0596323 0.935904 0.490397
OR (L95_U95) 0.723607 (0.66597_0.786231) 1.37695 (1.19808_1.58252) 1.00596 (0.894033_1.13189) 2.47276 (0.285812_21.3935) 0.940468 (0.67439_1.31153) 0.25441 (0.0439125_1.47394) 0.671781 (0.543053_0.831022) 0.43746 (0.0112664_16.986) 1.12355 (0.995282_1.26834) 1.03813 (0.417042_2.58418) 1.04671 (0.91935_1.19172)
TOMM40 :rs11556505, Chr19:44892887: C>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 T T T T T T T T T T T
P 4.86e-108 0.280115 5.78e-15 0.999971 0.290208 0.390511 0.00013708 0.726914 0.00011157 0.504467 2.85e-07
OR (L95_U95) 2.29043 (2.12799_2.46527) 1.12056 (0.911434_1.37768) 1.76617 (1.53118_2.03722) 0.999981 (0.36233_2.75981) 1.18727 (0.863778_1.63191) 3.89111 (0.175077_86.4808) 1.61043 (1.26061_2.05732) 1.62127 (0.107672_24.4124) 1.38513 (1.17414_1.63403) 1.41907 (0.50777_3.96587) 1.56334 (1.31814_1.85415)
NOCT:rs13116075 , Chr4:139008878: A>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 G G G G G G G G G G G
P 0.0874581 0.658188 0.113149 0.66702 0.9558 0.661009 0.142146 0.231494 0.180217 0.107993 0.705767
OR (L95_U95) 1.07114 (0.989957_1.15899) 1.10373 (0.712821_1.709) 0.865449 (0.723765_1.03487) 0.343613 (0.00264628_44.6173) 0.988192 (0.649261_1.50405) 1.89182 (0.109489_32.688) 0.831151 (0.649279_1.06397) 188.49 (0.0353377_1005400.0) 0.853469 (0.676933_1.07604) 0.10942 (0.00736793_1.62499) 0.965653 (0.80542_1.15776)
CASS4 :rs6024870 , Chr20:56422512: G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 A A A A A A A A A A A
P 0.317519 0.19334 0.947158 NA 0.743636 0.399733 0.159203 NA 0.604016 0.512028 0.79705
OR (L95_U95) 0.948467 (0.855001_1.05215) 0.851492 (0.668311_1.08488) 0.993588 (0.82148_1.20176) NA 1.17134 (0.454001_3.02213) 3.55752 (0.185509_68.2227) 0.836323 (0.652077_1.07263) NA 1.05138 (0.870015_1.27055) 0.458625 (0.0446159_4.7144) 1.02512 (0.848483_1.23854)
LRRC37A : rs2732703 , Chr17:46275856: T>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 G G G G G G G G G G G
P 0.0147474 0.545618 0.580112 NA 0.80132 0.877837 0.0979924 0.78562 0.931261 0.717238 0.639068
OR (L95_U95) 0.900167 (0.8272_0.979571) 0.862876 (0.534833_1.39212) 0.95293 (0.803301_1.13043) NA 0.928456 (0.52079_1.65524) 0.827929 (0.0745303_9.19716) 0.803044 (0.619302_1.0413) 1.46559 (0.0932775_23.0276) 0.989343 (0.775568_1.26204) 0.737015 (0.141339_3.84319) 0.956805 (0.795579_1.1507)
Conditional_model <- glm(PHENO ~ Protective/disease-modifying variant + APOE_STATUS (ε4 carriers) +SEX + AGE + PC1 + PC2 + PC3 + PC4 + PC5, data = data, family = binomial)
19q13.31 : rs10423769, chr19:43100929:G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 A A A A A A A A A A A
P 0.690443 0.517056 0.161042 NA NA 0.70344 0.535244 NA 0.922067 NA 0.157721
OR (L95_U95) 0.879192 (0.466549_1.6568) 0.936955 (0.769422_1.14097) 1.31287 (0.897222_1.92108) NA NA 2.51389 (0.0218339_289.443) 0.832044 (0.465285_1.4879) NA 1.00909 (0.841704_1.20978) NA 0.831481 (0.643669_1.07409)
APOE :rs449647, Chr19:44905307: A>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 T T T T T T T T T T T
P 0.438088 0.0624138 0.472261 0.43965 0.865612 0.139162 0.0285317 0.864837 0.496478 0.851361 0.941387
OR (L95_U95) 0.965782 (0.884422_1.05463) 1.15042 (0.99276_1.33312) 1.04487 (0.927005_1.17773) 2.38768 (0.262626_21.7078) 0.971482 (0.694882_1.35818) 0.291295 (0.0568107_1.49361) 0.780509 (0.625253_0.974316) 1.6768 (0.00436235_644.531) 0.956649 (0.841935_1.08699) 1.09711 (0.416133_2.89248) 0.995056 (0.871901_1.13561)
TOMM40 :rs11556505, Chr19:44892887: C>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 T T T T T T T T T T T
P 3.05e-06 0.349246 0.258 0.305313 0.925043 0.306123 0.825232 0.864985 0.0409785 0.517952 0.0463152
OR (L95_U95) 1.24509 (1.1356_1.36513) 1.10709 (0.894683_1.36993) 1.12255 (0.918784_1.3715) 0.386149 (0.0626103_2.38157) 0.980508 (0.650674_1.47754) 12.6053 (0.0983582_1615.46) 1.03582 (0.757949_1.41555) 1.35469 (0.0409377_44.8285) 1.19548 (1.00735_1.41876) 0.637351 (0.162678_2.49707) 1.20744 (1.00308_1.45342)
NOCT :rs13116075 , Chr4:139008878: A>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 G G G G G G G G G G G
P 0.11744 0.645244 0.119401 0.551474 0.995776 0.682833 0.228236 0.415815 0.190788 0.123526 0.623371
OR (L95_U95) 1.06849 (0.983453_1.16087) 1.11107 (0.709591_1.7397) 0.866307 (0.723148_1.03781) 0.222352 (0.00157819_31.3274) 1.00114 (0.657627_1.52408) 0.664864 (0.0938476_4.71024) 0.856635 (0.666008_1.10183) 3.39754 (0.178546_64.6512) 0.853379 (0.672949_1.08219) 0.12043 (0.00814495_1.78066) 0.954866 (0.794128_1.14814)
CASS4 :rs6024870 , Chr20:56422512: G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 A A A A A A A A A A A
P 0.166437 0.266129 0.885204 NA 0.722628 0.396827 0.0769097 NA 0.725645 0.491759 0.891828
OR (L95_U95) 0.925783 (0.829988_1.03263) 0.868781 (0.678012_1.11322) 1.01427 (0.836751_1.22946) NA 1.18792 (0.459014_3.07431) 4.06585 (0.158516_104.287) 0.795013 (0.616578_1.02509) NA 1.0353 (0.852927_1.25668) 0.434108 (0.0402219_4.68526) 1.0134 (0.836458_1.22778)
LRRC37A: rs2732703 , Chr17:46275856: T>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 G G G G G G G G G G G
P 0.0206232 0.478694 0.481538 NA 0.761611 0.861743 0.181446 0.831894 0.872138 0.833465 0.648529
OR (L95_U95) 0.900245 (0.823603_0.98402) 0.837245 (0.512161_1.36867) 0.939807 (0.790605_1.11717) NA 0.91409 (0.511621_1.63316) 0.806351 (0.0715386_9.08883) 0.834828 (0.640625_1.0879) 1.38359 (0.0690329_27.7305) 0.979684 (0.763012_1.25788) 0.838877 (0.163097_4.31471) 0.957399 (0.793949_1.1545)
Conditional_model <- glm(PHENO ~ Protective/disease-modifying variant + APOE_STATUS (ε4/ε4) +SEX + AGE + PC1 + PC2 + PC3 + PC4 + PC5, data = data, family = binomial)
19q13.31 : rs10423769, chr19:43100929:G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 A A A A A A A A A A A
P 0.520432 0.487737 0.242755 NA NA 0.723333 0.464294 NA 0.7821 NA 0.116951
OR (L95 U95) 0.818862 (0.445176_1.50622) 0.93305 (0.767187_1.13477) 1.25453 (0.857515_1.83537) NA NA 2.34504 (0.0209322_262.714) 0.806588 (0.453563_1.43439) NA 1.02572 (0.8568_1.22794) NA 0.814618 (0.630416_1.05264)
APOE :rs449647, Chr19:44905307: A>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 T T T T T T T T T T T
P 5.13e-07 0.00116208 0.65243 0.406828 0.713205 0.204203 0.00311608 0.937989 0.506202 0.940189 0.843606
OR (L95_U95) 0.80682 (0.741977_0.87733) 1.26706 (1.09841_1.4616) 1.02765 (0.912626_1.15718) 2.44129 (0.296298_20.1146) 0.939528 (0.673676_1.31029) 0.362537 (0.0757061_1.73609) 0.723028 (0.583137_0.896479) 1.17291 (0.021098_65.2066) 1.04321 (0.920878_1.1818) 1.03564 (0.414924_2.58492) 1.01332 (0.888485_1.1557)
TOMM40 :rs11556505, Chr19:44892887: C>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 T T T T T T T T T T T
P 1.68e-58 0.375778 1.22e-07 0.649911 0.24013 0.847088 0.00962134 0.823812 0.00964987 0.494246 0.000521882
OR (L95_U95) 1.95842 (1.80479_2.12513) 1.09968 (0.891141_1.35703) 1.5297 (1.30682_1.79058) 1.38741 (0.337396_5.70517) 1.21776 (0.876594_1.69171) 1.26953 (0.112259_14.357) 1.41037 (1.08715_1.82968) 1.25464 (0.17031_9.24275) 1.25348 (1.05637_1.48738) 1.46486 (0.490248_4.37702) 1.37305 (1.14789_1.64237)
NOCT:rs13116075 , Chr4:139008878: A>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 G G G G G G G G G G G
P 0.0886405 0.577482 0.126453 0.748873 0.954283 0.742716 0.138021 0.529144 0.183083 0.104656 0.648668
OR (L95_U95) 1.07213 (0.989528_1.16163) 1.13356 (0.729266_1.762) 0.869347 (0.726455_1.04035) 0.424654 (0.00224227_80.4235) 0.987788 (0.648967_1.5035) 0.713686 (0.0952421_5.34792) 0.828076 (0.645363_1.06252) 2.58464 (0.134278_49.7502) 0.851783 (0.672605_1.07869) 0.105682 (0.00700063_1.59537) 0.958323 (0.797957_1.15092)
CASS4 :rs6024870 , Chr20:56422512: G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 A A A A A A A A A A A
P 0.315877 0.203848 0.932446 NA 0.74473 0.985781 0.152267 NA 0.500034 0.509982 0.826824
OR (L95_U95) 0.947416 (0.852505_1.05289) 0.852854 (0.667192_1.09018) 0.991742 (0.818715_1.20134) NA 1.17055 (0.45363_3.02051) 0.979617 (0.101731_9.43317) 0.8319 (0.646608_1.07029) NA 1.06851 (0.881347_1.29542) 0.456796 (0.04441_4.69855) 1.02149 (0.844336_1.23581)
LRRC37A: rs2732703 , Chr17:46275856: T>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 G G G G G G G G G G G
P 0.0170534 0.526575 0.657118 NA 0.800316 0.80885 0.108589 0.842417 0.84495 0.720352 0.691408
OR (L95_U95) 0.90071 (0.826556_0.981517) 0.854763 (0.525895_1.38929) 0.961802 (0.809848_1.14227) NA 0.928096 (0.52057_1.65465) 0.767101 (0.0895205_6.57328) 0.806879 (0.620834_1.04868) 1.38422 (0.0561144_34.1458) 0.975534 (0.761079_1.25042) 0.739306 (0.141463_3.86371) 0.963032 (0.799585_1.15989)
r2_model <- lm(Protective/disease-modifying variant ~ APOESTATUS (ε4 carriers) +SEX + AGE + PC1 + PC2 + PC3 + PC4 + PC5, data = data)
19q13.31: rs10423769, chr19:43100929:G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
Multiple R-squared 0.005848 0.006813 0.01403 NA NA 0.06651 0.003517 NA 0.008922 NA 0.01368
Adjusted R-squared 0.00507 0.003417 0.01247 NA NA −0.2101 −0.00456 NA 0.005956 NA 0.01079
F-statistic 7.511 2.006 8.972 NA NA 0.2404 0.4354 NA 3.008 NA 4.728
p-value (F-statistic) 4.81e-10 0.04213 2.69e-12 NA NA 0.9792 0.9002 NA 0.002308 NA 8.90e-06
APOE :rs449647, Chr19:44905307: A>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
Multiple R-squared 0.05969 0.09666 0.008391 0.1156 0.02943 0.1789 0.07881 0.6671 0.0556 0.07086 0.01471
Adjusted R-squared 5.90e-02 0.09357 0.006819 0.01455 0.02626 −0.06436 0.07134 0.4769 0.05278 0.01851 0.01182
F-statistic 81.04 31.3 5.336 1.144 9.272 0.7354 10.55 3.507 19.67 1.354 5.091
p-value (F-statistic) < 2.2e-16 < 2.2e-16 1.08e-06 0.3455 1.15e-12 0.6598 2.72e-14 0.01951 < 2.2e-16 0.2221 2.62e-06
TOMM40 :rs11556505, Chr19:44892887: C>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
Multiple R-squared 0.4047 0.005166 0.5032 0.5528 0.3681 0.4932 0.4053 0.2905 0.03025 0.4191 0.1588
Adjusted R-squared 4.04e-01 0.001765 5.02e-01 0.5017 0.366 0.3431 0.4005 −0.1149 0.02735 0.3863 0.1563
F-statistic 867.9 1.519 638.5 10.82 178.1 3.285 84.07 0.7166 10.42 12.8 64.34
p-value (F-statistic) < 2.2e-16 0.1453 < 2.2e-16 8.93e-10 < 2.2e-16 0.009537 < 2.2e-16 0.6747 1.76e-14 9.05e-14 < 2.2e-16
AOCT:rs13116075 , Chr4:139008878: A>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
Multiple R-squared 0.001905 0.00331 0.04212 0.1196 0.01192 0.2339 0.01113 0.4501 0.02384 0.1287 0.007236
Adjusted R-squared 0.001124 −9.73E-05 0.0406 0.01903 0.008685 0.006878 0.003112 0.1359 0.02091 0.07962 0.004324
F-statistic 2.437 0.9714 27.72 1.189 3.688 1.03 1.388 1.432 8.159 2.622 2.485
p-value (F-statistic) 0.01247 0.4564 < 2.2e-16 0.3181 0.0002741 0.4381 0.1974 0.2659 5.90e-11 0.01045 0.01101
CASS4 :rs6024870 , Chr20:56422512: G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
Multiple R-squared 0.005311 0.008006 0.04053 NA 0.003495 0.2169 0.009504 NA 0.001664 0.09364 0.006718
Adjusted R-squared 0.004532 0.004614 0.03901 NA 0.0002362 −0.01509 0.001476 NA −0.001323 0.04258 0.003805
F-statistic 6.818 2.361 26.63 NA 1.072 0.935 1.184 NA 0.5571 1.834 2.306
p-value (F-statistic) 5.75e-09 0.01578 < 2.2e-16 NA 0.3794 0.5046 0.3055 NA 0.8136 0.07543 0.0184
LRRC37A: rs2732703 , Chr17:46275856: T>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
Multiple R-squared 0.007921 0.03169 0.07651 NA 0.01552 0.3253 0.01275 0.3684 0.03173 0.0346 0.008147
Adjusted R-squared 0.007144 0.02838 0.07505 NA 0.0123 0.1254 0.004751 0.007558 0.02883 −0.01979 0.005237
F-statistic 10.19 9.574 52.24 NA 4.821 1.627 1.594 1.021 10.95 0.6361 2.8
p-value (F-statistic) 2.74e-14 3.99e-13 < 2.2e-16 NA 6.59e-06 0.1635 0.1223 0.4641 2.65e-15 0.7463 0.004337
r2_model <- lm(Protective/disease-modifying variant ~ APOESTATUS (ε4/ε4) +SEX + AGE + PC1 + PC2 + PC3 + PC4 + PC5, data = data)
19q13.31: rs10423769, chr19:43100929:G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
Multiple R-squared 0.005736 0.007183 0.0141 NA NA 0.05772 0.00307 NA 0.0089 NA 0.01519
Adjusted R-squared 0.004957 0.003789 0.01254 NA NA −0.2215 −0.00501 NA 0.005934 NA 0.0123
F-statistic 7.366 2.116 9.019 NA NA 0.2067 0.38 NA 3.001 NA 5.258
p-value (F-statistic) 8.10e-10 0.03127 2.27e-12 NA NA 0.9871 0.9315 NA 0.00236 NA 1.49e-06
APOE :rs449647, Chr19:44905307: A>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
Multiple R-squared 0.0319 0.04362 0.005569 0.1584 0.02047 0.1899 0.03783 0.445 0.02097 0.04018 0.01183
Adjusted R-squared 3.11e-02 0.04035 0.003992 0.0622 0.01727 −0.05015 0.03003 0.1279 0.01804 −0.01389 0.008934
F-statistic 42.07 13.34 3.531 1.647 6.391 0.7911 4.85 1.403 7.155 0.7431 4.082
p-value (F-statistic) < 2.2e-16 < 2.2e-16 0.0004401 0.1274 3.05e-08 0.6149 6.99e-06 0.2767 2.06e-09 0.6533 7.59e-05
TOMM40 :rs11556505, Chr19:44892887: C>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
Multiple R-squared 0.2721 0.005496 0.1374 0.4969 0.07396 0.5143 0.1281 0.3759 0.02289 0.2014 0.08108
Adjusted R-squared 2.72e-01 0.002096 1.36e-01 0.4394 0.07093 0.3704 0.1211 0.01934 0.01996 0.1564 0.07838
F-statistic 477.2 1.617 100.4 8.642 24.42 3.573 18.13 1.054 7.826 4.476 30.08
p-value (F-statistic) < 2.2e-16 0.1149 < 2.2e-16 4.07e-08 < 2.2e-16 0.00599 < 2.2e-16 0.4443 1.93e-10 7.29e-05 < 2.2e-16
NOCT:rs13116075 , Chr4:139008878: A>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
Multiple R-squared 0.001848 0.003495 0.04217 0.1926 0.0117 0.2291 0.00869 0.4587 0.02382 0.1338 0.00723
Adjusted R-squared 0.001066 8.79E-05 0.04065 0.1004 0.008469 0.0007037 0.0006552 0.1493 0.02089 0.08501 0.004317
F-statistic 2.363 1.026 27.76 2.088 3.62 1.003 1.082 1.483 8.152 2.742 2.482
p-value (F-statistic) 0.01543 0.4139 < 2.2e-16 0.04845 0.0003401 0.4565 0.3735 0.248 6.05e-11 0.007637 0.01109
CASS4 :rs6024870 , Chr20:56422512: G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
Multiple R-squared 0.005269 0.007486 0.04021 NA 0.003431 0.1763 0.006623 NA 0.001632 0.09397 0.006616
Adjusted R-squared 0.00449 0.004093 0.03868 NA 0.0001714 −0.06771 −0.001429 NA −0.001357 0.04292 0.003701
F-statistic 6.763 2.206 26.41 NA 1.053 0.7226 0.8225 NA 0.546 1.841 2.27
p-value (F-statistic) 6.97e-09 0.02438 < 2.2e-16 NA 0.3939 0.6703 0.5827 NA 0.8223 0.07417 0.02034
LRRC37A: rs2732703, Chr17:46275856: T>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
Multiple R-squared 0.007924 0.03166 0.0766 NA 0.01559 0.3186 0.009751 0.2984 0.03179 0.03813 0.008379
Adjusted R-squared 0.007147 0.02835 0.07514 NA 0.01237 0.1167 0.001725 −0.1026 0.02889 −0.01606 0.00547
F-statistic 10.2 9.563 52.3 NA 4.843 1.578 1.215 0.7442 10.97 0.7036 2.88
p-value (F-statistic) 2.70e-14 4.14e-13 < 2.2e-16 NA 6.11e-06 0.1781 0.2866 0.6539 2.44e-15 0.688 0.0034
Interactionmodel <- glm(PHENO ~ Protective/disease-modifying variant * APOESTATUS (ε4 carriers) +SEX + AGE + PC1 + PC2 + PC3 + PC4 + PC5, data = data, family = binomial)
19q13.31: rs10423769, chr19:43100929:G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
P −0.318826 −4.166e-01 4.690e-01 NA NA NA 0.4752150 NA −0.1165126 NA 1.433e-01
Std. Error 0.708762 1.989e-01 4.654e-01 NA NA NA 0.6321330 NA 0.1847811 NA 2.718e-01
z value −0.450 −2.095 1.008 NA NA NA 0.752 NA −0.631 NA 0.527
p-value 0.652829 0.03619 0.313568 NA NA NA 0.4522 NA 0.52834 NA 0.598
APOE :rs449647, Chr19:44905307: A>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
P −0.270222 −1.446e-02 −2.146e-01 −1.31410 −0.41516 −17.92462 −0.3188204 NA −0.2674458 −0.28649 9.553e-02
Std. Error 0.105633 1.494e-01 1.423e-01 2.47308 0.50059 2971.41668 0.2675842 NA 0.1298759 1.13455 1.405e-01
z value −2.558 −0.097 −1.508 −0.531 −0.829 −0.006 −1.191 NA −2.059 −0.253 0.680
p-value 0.010524 0.92290 0.131445 0.595167 0.406911 0.9952 0.2335 NA 0.03947 0.800642 0.497
TOMM40 :rs11556505, Chr19:44892887: C>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
P 3.048e-01 −1.037e-01 4.267e-01 −1.84506 −4.491e-02 −10.51189 0.2308497 50.468 0.0356318 −0.77961 1.709e-01
Std. Error 9.651e-02 2.173e-01 2.268e-01 1.98319 4.240e-01 2444.76386 0.3406798 3499.371 0.1757837 1.42636 1.915e-01
z value 3.158 −0.477 1.882 −0.930 −0.106 −0.004 0.678 0.014 0.203 −0.547 0.892
p-value 0.001586 0.63323 0.059868 0.35219 0.915644 0.9966 0.49802 0.988 0.83937 0.584671 0.372
AOCT:rs13116075 , Chr4:139008878: A>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
P −8.385e-02 −9.510e-01 7.260e-02 NA 0.26446 −3.81041 −0.2010145 −5.534e+02 0.5046073 −1.385e+00 2.081e-01
Std. Error 8.649e-02 4.567e-01 2.000e-01 NA 0.49224 2.97982 0.2679418 2.485e+06 0.2500546 3.982e+03 2.023e-01
z value −0.969 −2.082 0.363 NA 0.537 −1.279 −0.750 0.000 2.018 0.000 1.029
p-value 0.33232 0.03732 0.716605 NA 0.591085 0.2010 0.4531 1.000 0.043592 0.99972 0.304
CASS4 :rs6024870 , Chr20:56422512: G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
P −2.061e-01 −9.165e-02 1.605e-01 NA −0.14240 −17.90442 −0.2340929 NA 0.1964231 −1.592e+01 −4.237e-01
Std. Error 1.121e-01 2.531e-01 2.191e-01 NA 1.25526 2623.75448 0.2607464 NA 0.2011266 1.264e+03 2.070e-01
z value −1.839 −0.362 0.732 NA −0.113 −0.007 −0.898 NA 0.977 −0.013 −2.047
p-value 0.065858 0.71722 0.463960 NA 0.909678 0.9946 0.3693 NA 0.32876 0.989947 0.0406
LRRC37A: rs2732703, Chr17:46275856: T>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
P −6.999e-03 3.639e-01 3.705e-01 NA −0.14487 −0.20542 −0.3455109 NA −0.2151586 −15.95199 8.660e-02
Std. Error 9.252e-02 5.076e-01 1.866e-01 NA 0.67397 2.71021 0.2772725 NA 0.2525163 1689.31304 2.043e-01
z value −0.076 0.717 1.985 NA −0.215 −0.076 −1.246 NA −0.852 −0.009 0.424
p-value 0.939698 0.47344 0.047098 NA 0.829805 0.9396 0.2127 NA 0.39418 0.992466 0.672
Interaction model <- glm(PHENO ~ Protective/disease-modifying variant * APOESTATUS (ε4/ε4) +SEX + AGE + PC1 + PC2 + PC3 + PC4 + PC5, data = data, family = binomial)
19q13.31: rs10423769, chr19:43100929:G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
P 4.911e+00 −1.297e-01 3.386e-01 NA NA NA 6.083e+00 NA −0.0109888 NA −1.266e-01
Std. Error 6.962e+01 1.673e-01 6.141e-01 NA NA NA 1.881e+02 NA 0.2050836 NA 2.496e-01
z value 0.071 −0.775 0.551 NA NA NA 0.032 NA −0.054 NA −0.507
p-value 0.9438 0.43845 0.581417 NA NA NA 0.974203 NA 0.95727 NA 0.611873
APOE :rs449647, Chr19:44905307: A>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
P 1.985e-01 3.898e-02 −6.337e-01 7.06937 −6.024637 NA NA NA −0.4090145 7.737451 −6.361e-02
Std. Error 3.794e-01 1.254e-01 2.572e-01 872.99690 187.324036 NA NA NA 0.1331053 688.428638 1.580e-01
z value 0.523 0.311 −2.464 0.008 −0.032 NA NA NA −3.073 0.011 −0.403
p-value 0.6008 0.755964 0.013753 0.993539 0.974343 NA NA NA 0.00212 0.991033 0.687273
TOMM40 :rs11556505, Chr19:44892887: C>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
P −2.868e-01 −1.377e-01 −3.712e-02 −7.69280 0.007408 5.14876 −0.0208789 −1.042e+02 −0.1621401 −7.062849 −1.911e-01
Std. Error 8.295e-02 1.929e-01 1.600e-01 868.83988 0.678194 2797.44372 0.2745880 4.104e+05 0.1470801 727.699410 1.585e-01
z value −3.457 −0.714 −0.232 −0.009 0.011 0.002 −0.076 0.000 −1.102 −0.010 −1.206
p-value 0.000546 0.475415 0.816578 0.992936 0.991284 0.9985 0.9394 1.000 0.27029 0.992256 0.227812
NOCT:rs13116075 , Chr4:139008878: A>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
P −1.127e-01 −9.841e-01 −6.797e-01 NA −5.758776 NA 0.1252292 −1.879e+02 0.1242855 NA −4.846e-01
Std. Error 9.604e-02 5.861e-01 3.291e-01 NA 194.924414 NA 0.4583244 2.720e+05 0.2773288 NA 2.277e-01
z value −1.173 −1.679 −2.065 NA −0.030 NA 0.273 −0.001 0.448 NA −2.128
p-value 0.2407 0.093119 0.038876 NA 0.976431 NA 0.78467 0.999 0.6540 NA 0.033307
CASS4 :rs6024870 , Chr20:56422512: G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
P −6.057e-02 1.027e-01 −2.230e-02 NA −5.08657 −6.10931 −0.3588910 NA 0.1269480 −6.715306 −1.595e-02
Std. Error 1.280e-01 2.424e-01 2.954e-01 NA 267.70598 2797.44428 0.3317201 NA 0.2388870 727.699378 2.476e-01
z value −0.473 0.424 −0.075 NA −0.019 −0.002 −1.082 NA 0.531 −0.009 −0.064
p-value 0.6361 0.671842 0.939822 NA 0.984841 0.9983 0.27929 NA 0.59513 0.992637 0.949
LRRC37A: rs2732703 , Chr17:46275856: T>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
P 8.827e-02 1.163e-01 2.941e-02 NA −5.49623 5.63281 −0.1043969 −1.440e+02 0.1053866 NA −9.881e-02
Std. Error 1.098e-01 4.620e-01 2.958e-01 NA 218.06889 2797.44375 0.4237288 2.458e+05 0.2752225 NA 2.549e-01
z value 0.804 0.252 0.099 NA −0.025 0.002 −0.246 −0.001 0.383 NA −0.388
p-value 0.4215 0.801198 0.920809 NA 0.979892 0.9984 0.80539 1.000 0.70178 NA 0.698256
Conditionalmodel <- glm(PHENO ~ Protective/disease-modifying variant + APOESTATUS (ε3/ε3) +SEX + AGE + PC1 + PC2 + PC3 + PC4 + PC5, data = data, family = binomial)
19q13.31: rs10423769, chr19:43100929:G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 A A A A A A A A A A A
P 0.519217 0.508413 0.199474 NA NA 0.720057 0.490052 NA 0.964739 NA 0.164826
OR (L95_U95) 0.8154 (0.438395_1.51662) 0.936386 (0.770645_1.13777) 1.28189 (0.877204_1.87326) NA NA 2.4021 (0.0199145_289.744) 0.816622 (0.459406_1.45159) NA 0.995971 (0.832748_1.19119) NA 0.835427 (0.648215_1.07671)
APOE :rs449647, Chr19:44905307: A>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 T T T T T T T T T T T
P 3.76e-09 0.000378349 0.843162 0.409142 0.744106 0.139232 0.00257546 0.220398 0.536594 0.790636 0.861296
OR (L95_U95) 0.774637 (0.71158_0.843283) 1.29317 (1.12226_1.49011) 1.01206 (0.898723_1.13969) 2.50033 (0.283747_22.0325) 0.946117 (0.678434_1.31942) 0.284837 (0.0539092_1.50498) 0.716756 (0.577206_0.890043) .0239989 (6.15937e-05_9.35072 1.03989 (0.918565_1.17724) 0.880239 (0.34325_2.25731) 1.01175 (0.887525_1.15335)
TOMM40 :rs11556505, Chr19:44892887: C>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 T T T T T T T T T T T
P 1.28e-38 0.50568 0.000100648 0.931317 0.915364 0.49694 0.0510141 0.649767 0.00876273 0.688142 0.00210663
OR (L95_U95) 1.8019 (1.64879_1.96923) 1.07366 (0.870902_1.32363) 1.43907 (1.19788_1.72882) 0.946922 (0.273961_3.27296) 1.02006 (0.707227_1.47127) 2.39398 (0.192874_29.7145) 1.33147 (0.998739_1.77504) 1.46764 (0.280186_7.68758) 1.25301 (1.05855_1.4832) 0.779007 (0.230106_2.63727) 1.33379 (1.11007_1.60258)
AOCT:rs13116075 , Chr4:139008878: A>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 G G G G G G G G G G G
P 0.0921729 0.579616 0.111308 0.658318 0.983852 0.690334 0.205043 0.492526 0.159087 0.150941 0.597635
OR (L95_U95) 1.07181 (0.988702_1.1619) 1.13268 (0.728891_1.76017) 0.863958 (0.721646_1.03434) 0.332386 (0.00252112_43.822) 0.99567 (0.654064_1.51569) 1.79433 (0.101114_31.8415) 0.850932 (0.66294_1.09223) 3.02023 (0.128563_70.9521) 0.844765 (0.667978_1.06834) 0.139696 (0.00952012_2.04987) 0.951919 (0.792742_1.14306)
CASS4 :rs6024870 , Chr20:56422512: G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 A A A A A A A A A A A
P 0.198142 0.2355 0.895017 NA 0.733941 0.317651 0.132828 NA 0.699167 0.495562 0.816941
OR (L95_U95) 0.93265 (0.838685_1.03714) 0.862441 (0.675375_1.10132) 1.01298 (0.83637_1.22689) NA 1.17936 (0.455509_3.05349) 5.57921 (0.191552_162.501) 0.824916 (0.641812_1.06026) NA 1.0385 (0.857433_1.2578) 0.442584 (0.0424502_4.61436) 1.02274 (0.845421_1.23726)
LRRC37A: rs2732703 , Chr17:46275856: T>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
A1 G G G G G G G G G G G
P 0.0159467 0.469114 0.499232 NA 0.765328 0.888089 0.141762 0.630329 0.722082 0.859343 0.603084
OR (L95_U95) 0.899139 (0.824667_0.980338) 0.836562 (0.516022_1.35621) 0.942435 (0.793531_1.11928) NA 0.915569 (0.513034_1.63394) 0.841499 (0.0760695_9.30887) 0.821482 (0.631937_1.06788) 2.02936 (0.113665_36.2319) 0.956198 (0.747062_1.22388) 0.86174 (0.166199_4.4681) 0.951874 (0.790384_1.14636)
r2_model <- lm(Protective/disease-modifying variant ~ APOESTATUS (ε3/ε3) +SEX + AGE + PC1 + PC2 + PC3 + PC4 + PC5, data = data)
19q13.31: rs10423769, chr19:43100929:G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
Multiple R-squared 0.005739 0.007209 0.01396 NA NA 0.08435 0.003222 NA 0.009795 NA 0.01382
Adjusted R-squared 0.00496 0.003815 0.01239 NA NA −0.187 −0.004857 NA 0.006832 NA 0.01093
F-statistic 7.369 2.124 8.924 NA NA 0.3109 0.3988 NA 3.305 NA 4.776
p-value (F-statistic) 8.001e-10 0.03061 3.205e-12 NA NA 0.9552 0.9215 NA 0.000918 NA 7.57e-06
APOE :rs449647, Chr19:44905307: A>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
Multiple R-squared 0.01708 0.0417 0.004391 0.09561 0.01963 0.1763 0.03854 0.557 0.03105 0.05191 0.01413
Adjusted R-squared 0.01631 0.03843 0.002812 −0.007747 0.01642 −0.06776 0.03074 0.3038 0.02815 −0.001505 0.01124
F-statistic 22.18 12.73 2.781 0.925 6.122 0.7224 4.945 2.2 10.71 0.9718 4.885
p-value (F-statistic) < 2.2e-16 < 2.2e-16 0.004543 0.5015 7.75e-08 0.6704 5.12e-06 0.09414 6.324e-15 0.4605 5.251e-06
TOMM40 :rs11556505, Chr19:44892887: C>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
Multiple R-squared 0.3606 0.007793 0.4079 0.3913 0.2386 0.542 0.3094 0.2094 0.02844 0.2733 0.1477
Adjusted R-squared 0.3601 0.004401 0.4069 0.3217 0.2361 0.4063 0.3038 −0.2424 0.02554 0.2324 0.1452
F-statistic 720.1 2.297 434.3 5.625 95.83 3.994 55.26 0.4635 9.782 6.676 59.09
p-value (F-statistic) < 2.2e-16 0.01888 < 2.2e-16 1.641e-05 < 2.2e-16 0.003104 < 2.2e-16 0.862 1.769e-13 2.122e-07 < 2.2e-16
AOCT:rs13116075 , Chr4:139008878: A>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
Multiple R-squared 0.001859 0.003644 0.04211 0.111 0.01174 0.2214 0.01144 0.4719 0.02385 0.1566 0.007509
Adjusted R-squared 0.001077 0.0002378 0.04059 0.009412 0.008509 −0.009359 0.003432 0.1701 0.02093 0.1091 0.004597
F-statistic 2.378 1.07 27.72 1.093 3.632 0.9594 1.428 1.564 8.162 3.297 2.579
p-value (F-statistic) 0.0148 0.3813 < 2.2e-16 0.3787 0.000327 0.4869 0.1803 0.2219 5.824e-11 0.001752 0.008361
CASS4 :rs6024870 , Chr20:56422512: G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
Multiple R-squared 0.005369 0.008078 0.04074 NA 0.003443 0.1515 0.00698 NA 0.001719 0.09891 0.006579
Adjusted R-squared 0.00459 0.004687 0.03922 NA 0.0001839 −0.09995 −0.001069 NA −0.001269 0.04814 0.003665
F-statistic 6.891 2.382 26.78 NA 1.056 0.6025 0.8672 NA 0.5753 1.948 2.258
p-value (F-statistic) 4.416e-09 0.01484 < 2.2e-16 NA 0.391 0.7675 0.5438 NA 0.7989 0.05729 0.02107
LRRC37A: rs2732703, Chr17:46275856: T>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
Multiple R-squared 0.007884 0.03186 0.07655 NA 0.01582 0.3186 0.01161 0.3118 0.03262 0.03457 0.008172
Adjusted R-squared 0.007107 0.02855 0.07509 NA 0.0126 0.1167 0.003595 −0.08138 0.02972 −0.01982 0.005262
F-statistic 10.15 9.626 52.27 NA 4.915 1.578 1.449 0.793 11.27 0.6356 2.808
p-value (F-statistic) 3.267e-14 3.314e-13 < 2.2e-16 NA 4.801e-06 0.178 0.172 0.6178 8.397e-16 0.7468 0.004226
Interactionmodel <- glm(PHENO ~ Protective/disease-modifying variant * APOESTATUS (ε3/ε3) +SEX + AGE + PC1 + PC2 + PC3 + PC4 + PC5, data = data, family = binomial)
19q13.31: rs10423769, chr19:43100929:G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
P −1.891e-01 1.515e-01 −4.637e-02 NA NA NA −0.2460774 NA 0.0276379 NA −6.915e-02
Std. Error 3.283e-01 1.026e-01 2.072e-01 NA NA NA 0.3012184 NA 0.0948777 NA 1.294e-01
z value −0.576 1.476 −0.224 NA NA NA −0.817 NA 0.291 NA −0.535
p-value 0.5647 0.139875 0.822920 NA NA NA 0.413963 NA 0.77082 NA 0.593
APOE :rs449647, Chr19:44905307: A>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
P 3.175e-01 −1.109e-01 1.077e-01 0.32804 0.14264 9.32091 0.1583801 −1.113e+01 −0.0482250 0.237946 −3.086e-03
Std. Error 4.275e-02 7.697e-02 6.468e-02 1.21693 0.18349 1470.20000 0.1127026 1.886e+05 0.0665037 0.473634 6.682e-02
z value 7.426 −1.441 1.665 0.270 0.777 0.006 1.405 0.000 −0.725 0.502 −0.046
p-value 1.12e-13 0.149703 0.095932 0.787494 0.436955 0.9949 0.159935 1.000 0.46836 0.615398 0.963
TOMM40 :rs11556505, Chr19:44892887: C>T
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
P −3.407e-01 −1.131e-01 −3.658e-01 −8.11183 −0.1715 4.27063 −0.3470659 −1.898e+02 −0.0667558 −7.288818 −2.756e-01
Std. Error 6.200e-02 1.187e-01 1.209e-01 986.15329 0.2004 1199.77469 0.1815237 1.617e+05 0.0960520 807.636366 1.044e-01
z value −5.495 −0.953 −3.026 −0.008 −0.856 0.004 −1.912 −0.001 −0.695 −0.009 −2.639
p-value 3.92e-08 0.34073 0.002482 0.99344 0.392163 0.9972 0.05588 0.999 0.48706 0.992799 0.00831
AOCT:rs13116075 , Chr4:139008878: A>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
P 0.013728 4.872e-01 −4.247e-02 NA −0.27401 1.38743 0.0965789 −3033.5 −0.1944697 4.893e-01 3.525e-02
Std. Error 0.041199 2.252e-01 9.446e-02 NA 0.21894 1.33996 0.1279155 435634.5 0.1258033 1.749e+03 9.380e-02
z value 0.333 2.164 −0.450 NA −1.252 1.035 0.755 −0.007 −1.546 0.000 0.376
p-value 0.7390 0.030476 0.653013 NA 0.210747 0.3005 0.45024 0.994 0.122147 0.999777 0.707
CASS4 :rs6024870 , Chr20:56422512: G>A
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
P 8.275e-02 1.323e-01 −6.875e-03 NA 0.47141 8.55974 0.0218776 NA −0.0635796 8.357e+00 1.233e-01
Std. Error 5.391e-02 1.266e-01 1.032e-01 NA 0.60405 1309.66064 0.1280412 NA 0.1009443 7.479e+02 9.777e-02
z value 1.535 1.045 −0.067 NA 0.780 0.007 0.171 NA −0.630 0.011 1.261
p-value 0.1248 0.296074 0.946866 NA 0.435140 0.9948 0.864331 NA 0.52879 0.991085 0.207
LRRC37A: rs2732703, Chr17:46275856: T>G
Ancestry EUR AFR AMR EAS SAS MDE AJ FIN AAC CAS CAH
P 2.905e-02 2.406e-01 −2.053e-01 NA 0.1459 −0.35985 0.0223262 NA 0.0386594 −0.418667 −1.656e-02
Std. Error 4.379e-02 2.542e-01 8.825e-02 NA 0.3104 1.29242 0.1328074 NA 0.1275317 0.865756 9.532e-02
z value 0.663 0.946 −2.327 NA 0.470 −0.278 0.168 NA 0.303 −0.484 −0.174
p-value 0.5071 0.34390 0.019977 NA 0.638221 0.7807 0.86650 NA 0.7618 0.628680 0.862

ASP, Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project; EUR, European; AFR, African; AMR, American Admixed; AAC,African Admixed; AJ, Ashkenazi Jewish; CAS, Central Asian; EAS, Eastern Asian; SAS, South Asian; MDE, Middle Eastern; FIN, Finnish; CAH, Complex Admixture History; NA, Not available

In brief, we observe higher frequencies of individuals carrying APOE:rs449647-T, 19q13.31:rs10423769-A, APP:rs466433-G, or APP:rs364048-C protective variant alleles alongside either one or two copies of APOE ε4 among African and African Admixed ancestries compared to Europeans in AD, related dementias, and controls. Of note, carriers of APOE:rs449647-T and 19q13.31:rs10423769-A are particularly noteworthy because APOE:rs449647-T displays the highest frequency among these ancestries, and the ratio of frequencies for 19q13.31:rs10423769-A in both African and African Admixed ancestries compared to Europeans is substantially higher than the other protective/disease-modifying variants investigated across all three cohorts. In individuals of African ancestry, 19q13.31:rs10423769-A was found to have a higher frequency in controls compared to both AD and related dementia cases among APOE ε4 homozygous or heterozygous carriers. In contrast, APOE:rs449647-T was found to have a lower frequency in controls compared to AD cases among APOE ε4 homozygous or heterozygous carriers in African ancestry but showed a higher frequency in controls carrying APOE ε4/ε4 versus cases in European populations (Supplementary Table 12).

The combination of TOMM40:rs11556505-T with either homozygous or heterozygous APOE ε4 was observed to have a higher frequency in Europeans and a lower frequency in Africans compared to most other ancestries across all three phenotypes. Additionally, the combination of NOCT:rs13116075-G and APOE ε4 homozygous or heterozygous was found to have a higher frequency in individuals of European and African Admixed ancestry versus Africans, in AD cases as compared to controls.

The protective model shows a modifying effect of APOE:rs449647-T in European, African, and Ashkenazi Jewish ancestries as well as a modifying effect of TOMM40:rs11556505-T in European, American Admixed, Ashkenazi Jewish, African Admixed, and individuals of Complex Admixture History. The R2 model indicates that these variants are not in linkage disequilibrium with the APOE risk variants rs429358 and rs7412 (Table 6).

Significant interactions were found between APOE ε4 and the following variants: 19q13.31:rs10423769-A in Africans; NOCT:rs13116075-G in both African and African Admixed populations; CASS4:rs6024870-A in the Complex Admixed History group; LRRC37A:rs2732703-G in the American Admixed ancestry; APOE:rs449647-T in European and African Admixed ancestries; and TOMM40:rs11556505-T in Europeans. In APOE ε4/ε4 carriers, the interaction with APOE:rs449647-T was found to be significant in American Admixed and African Admixed populations, while TOMM40:rs11556505-T was significant in the European ancestry (Table 6).

The interaction model in APOE ε3/ε3 shows no significant p-value for 19q13.31:rs10423769-A in Africans, NOCT:rs13116075-G in African Admixed ancestry, CASS4:rs6024870-A in Complex Admixed History, and LRRC37A:rs2732703-G in American Admixed ancestry, but highly significant p-values for APOE:rs449647-T and TOMM40:rs11556505-T in European and NOCT:rs13116075-G in Africans with opposite directional effects compared to APOE ε4 carriers. These data confirm the role of these variants in modulating the effect of APOE ε4 in AD risk (Table 6).

Discussion

We undertook the largest and most comprehensive characterization of potential disease-causing, risk, protective, and disease-modifying variants in known AD/ADRDs genes to date, aiming to create an accessible genetic catalog of both known and novel coding and splicing variants associated with AD/ADRDs in a global context. Our results expand our understanding of the genetic basis of these conditions, potentially leading to new insights into their pathogenesis, risk, and progression. A comprehensive genetic catalog can inform the development of targeted therapies and personalized medicine approaches in the new era of precision therapeutics.

We present a user-friendly platform for the AD/ADRDs research community that enables easy and interactive access to these results (https://niacard.shinyapps.io/MAMBARD_browser/). This browser may serve as a valuable resource for researchers, clinicians, and clinical trial design.

We identified 116 genetic variants (18 known and 98 novel) in AD/ADRDs across diverse populations. The successful replication of novel variants across different datasets increases the likelihood of these variants being pathogenic and warrants further validation through future functional studies, highlighting their potential broader applicability and significance in global genetics research.

We identified 20 potentially disease-causing variants in non-European ancestries, including 13 that were absent in individuals of European ancestry. This highlights the necessity of expanding genetics research to diverse populations, corroborating the notion that the genetic architecture of AD/ADRDs risk differs across populations. We identified a total of 21 variants in control individuals that had been previously reported as disease-causing. This scenario involves three possibilities: (i) the mutation is a non-disease-causing variant found by chance in an AD patient, (ii) the mutation is pathogenic but exhibits incomplete penetrance, or (iii) control individuals represent undiagnosed patients. These findings reveal the potential for conflicting reports and misinterpretations, emphasizing the need for careful analysis and functional validation in genetics research. It underscores the critical importance of caution in identifying and interpreting potentially-pathogenic variants, which is essential for ensuring accurate diagnosis, risk assessment, genetic counseling, and development of effective treatments.

We conducted genotype-phenotype correlations for both known and novel variants. Our findings involving known variants largely reinforce previous studies, while expanding the clinical spectrum for various types of dementia, exhibiting different AAO and/or additional clinical features not previously reported. While the genotype-phenotype correlations for newly identified variants require further investigation to fully understand their impact, we identified 19 novel variants that may potentially be associated with early-onset dementia and therefore warrant further study.

While several studies have conducted APOE genotyping across different age groups, sexes, and population ancestries [78,79], the differential role of APOE across 11 ancestries in a global context has not yet been explored. We found that individuals of African and African Admixed ancestries harbor a higher frequency of APOE ε4/ε4 carriers than individuals of European ancestry. Recent studies have shed light on the varying risk associated with APOE ε4 alleles in populations of African ancestry. Indeed, it has been reported that individuals of African descent who carry the APOE ε4 allele have a lower risk of developing AD compared to other populations with the same allele. This suggests that the genetic background of African ancestry around the APOE gene is linked to a reduced odds ratio for risk variants [77]. Furthermore, a recent study has suggested the presence of a resilient locus (19q13.31) potentially modifying APOE ε4 risk in African-descent populations. This disease-modifying locus, located 2MB from APOE, significantly lowers the AD risk for African APOE ε4 carriers, reducing the magnitude of the effect from 7.2 to 2.1 [10]. Our finding is in concordance with the largest AD meta-analysis conducted to date [77]. We identified several variants with high frequency among APOE ε4 homozygous or heterozygous carriers in African and African Admixed ancestries. Notably, individuals carrying both APOE ε4 homozygous or heterozygous and either APOE:rs449647-T or 19q13.31:rs10423769-A exhibit higher frequencies in African and African Admixed ancestries compared to Europeans.

Considering all the models under study, we find that in the presence of APOE ε4, APOE:rs449647-T decreases the risk of AD in Europeans but increases it in Africans. TOMM40:rs11556505-T increases the risk of AD in Europeans. TOMM40:rs11556505-T also increases the risk of AD in American Admixed and Ashkenazi Jewish ancestries, though not through an interaction with APOE. An interaction effect with APOE was found for 19q13.31:rs10423769-A, NOCT:rs13116075-G, CASS4:rs6024870-A, and LRRC37A:rs2732703-G. Specifically, 19q13.31:rs10423769-A reduces the risk of AD in Africans, NOCT:rs13116075-G reduces the risk in Africans but increases it in African Admixed ancestry, CASS4:rs6024870-A reduces the risk in Complex Admixed History ancestry, and LRRC37A:rs2732703-G increases the risk in American Admixed ancestry.

Our findings support previous literature, which indicates that 19q13.31 is an African-ancestry-specific locus that reduces the risk effect of APOE ε4 for developing AD. APOE:rs449647-T is a polymorphism in the regulatory region of APOE that can modulate the risk of developing AD by altering its affinity to transcription factors, thus affecting gene expression. Our study demonstrates its association with an increased risk of AD in APOE ε4 carriers of African ancestry and a decreased risk in APOE ε4 carriers of European ancestry. TOMM40:rs11556505-T has been variably associated with both risk and protective effects, likely depending on the phenotype being evaluated [11]. We show an association with an increased risk of AD in APOE ε4 carriers, particularly in Europeans. In addition, this study reveals the disease-modifying effect of NOCT:rs13116075-G, CASS4:rs6024870-A and LRRC37A:rs2732703-G across different ancestries. The interaction of these variants with APOE ε4 is not known, but identifying the mechanism(s) conferring protection could provide greater insights into the etiology of AD and inform potential ancestry-specific therapeutic interventions.

This comprehensive genetic characterization, the largest of its kind for AD/ADRDs across diverse populations, holds critical implications for potential clinical trials and therapeutic interventions in a global context, highlighting its significance for such efforts worldwide. For example, clinical trials for GRN have recently commenced [80] (https://www.theaftd.org/posts/1ftd-in-the-news/b-ftd-grn-gene-therapy-abio/). Understanding population-specific frequencies of genetic contributors to disease is vital in the design and implementation of clinical trials for several reasons. Firstly, it allows for targeted recruitment, ensuring that studies include an adequate number of participants concordant with their genetic makeup. Secondly, it promotes diversity in clinical trial populations, which is essential to understand disease globally, as well as treatment responses across different groups. Furthermore, knowledge of population-specific variant frequencies may inform treatment efficacy assessments in the future, as genetics may influence treatment outcomes. In summary, it plays a vital role in personalized medicine, guiding more targeted and effective treatments based on individuals’ genetic profiles.

Despite our efforts, there are several limitations and shortcomings to consider in this study. A major limitation is the underrepresentation of certain populations, which leads to underpowered datasets limiting the possibility of drawing firm conclusions. Additionally, the reliance on currently available datasets may introduce biases, as these datasets often have varying levels of coverage, quality, and accurate clinical information. Another relevant consideration is the differing exclusion criteria for controls across cohorts, which may affect the comparability of results. Future research should aim to include more diverse populations and improve the quality of genetic data in addition to standardized data harmonization efforts. Moreover, functional validation of identified variants is necessary to confirm their pathogenicity and relevance to AD/ADRDs.

Lastly, ongoing collaborations between researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers are crucial to ensure that advancements in genetic research translate into equitable and effective clinical applications. Our study is a step towards addressing these limitations by providing a more diverse genetic characterization and highlighting the need for inclusive research practices. Future directions should continue to focus on enhancing the robustness and applicability of genetic findings in AD/ADRDs research, making knowledge globally relevant.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1

Supplementary Figure 1- PCA plots in (A) All of Us, (B) UKB, (C) ADSP, (D) AMP PD, and (E) 100 KGP.

media-1.pdf (476.2KB, pdf)
Supplement 2

Supplementary Figure 2- Heatmaps showing the frequencies of all identified variants in the discovery and replication phases across all ancestries in each biobank.

media-2.pdf (468.2KB, pdf)
Supplement 3

Supplementary Figure 3- Proportion of APOE genotypes in (A) Alzheimer’s disease, (B) related dementias, and (C) controls across 11 genetic ancestries.

Unknown genotypes and those absent across all ancestries were excluded from the analysis. Genotypes and ancestries not available in the 100KGP were also excluded.

media-3.pdf (723KB, pdf)
Supplement 4

Supplementary Figure 4- Proportions of individuals carrying both APOE ε4/ε4 genotypes and protective or disease-modifying variants across 11 genetic ancestries in Alzheimer’s disease, related dementias, and controls in all datasets.

Supplementary Figures 4A and 4C represent SNP distribution within each cohort, and Supplementary Figures 4B and 4D represent SNP distribution between cohorts. The total populations of each ancestry were used to generate 4A and 4B, while the total numbers of ε4/ε4 carriers for each ancestry were used to generate 4C and 4D. Supplementary Figures 4B and 4D show allele frequency ratios (AD-to-Control, left; Related dementias-to-Control, right) among APOE ε4/ε4 carriers for each of the candidate protective or disease-modifying variant, per ancestry. Warmer colors represent higher frequencies in cases versus controls, while cooler colors represent higher frequencies in controls versus cases, with dark blue (N/A) representing variants not present in either cases or controls.

media-4.pdf (322.5KB, pdf)
Supplement 5
media-5.pdf (87KB, pdf)
Supplement 6
media-6.pdf (1.8MB, pdf)
Supplement 7
media-7.pdf (594KB, pdf)
Supplement 8
media-8.pdf (571.4KB, pdf)
Supplement 9
media-9.pdf (608.7KB, pdf)
Supplement 10
media-10.pdf (842.8KB, pdf)
Supplement 11
media-11.pdf (147.5KB, pdf)
Supplement 12
media-12.pdf (836.4KB, pdf)
Supplement 13
media-13.pdf (143.1KB, pdf)
Supplement 14

Supplementary Table 1- Discovery phase: Multi-ancestry summary of all variants identified in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia cases in AoU

media-14.xlsx (42.9KB, xlsx)
Supplement 15

Supplementary Table 2- Discovery phase: Multi-ancestry summary of all variants identified in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia cases in UKB

media-15.xlsx (150.2KB, xlsx)
Supplement 16

Supplementary Table 3- Discovery phase: Multi-ancestry summary of all variants identified in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia cases in 100KGP

media-16.xlsx (11.9KB, xlsx)
Supplement 17

Supplementary Table 4- Multi-ancestry summary of variants previously reported as potential disease-causing but identified in controls in multiple databases in this study

media-17.xlsx (12.9KB, xlsx)
Supplement 18

Supplementary Table 5- Phenotypic data for all individuals carrying known and novel potential disease-causing variants in the discovery phase

media-18.xlsx (29.3KB, xlsx)
Supplement 19

Supplementary Table 6- Phenotypic data for all individuals carrying known and novel potential disease-causing variants in the replication phase

media-19.xlsx (114.8KB, xlsx)
Supplement 20

Supplementary Table 7- Multi-ancestry summary of individuals carrying both APOE genotypes and protective or disease-modifying variants in patients and controls in AoU

media-20.xlsx (60.1KB, xlsx)
Supplement 21

Supplementary Table 8- Multi-ancestry summary of individuals carrying both APOE genotypes and protective or disease-modifying variants in patients and controls in ADSP

media-21.xlsx (53.7KB, xlsx)
Supplement 22

Supplementary Table 9- Multi-ancestry summary of individuals carrying both APOE genotypes and protective or disease-modifying variants in patients and controls in AMP PD

media-22.xlsx (39.4KB, xlsx)
Supplement 23

Supplementary Table 10- Multi-ancestry summary of individuals carrying both APOE genotypes and protective or disease-modifying variants in patients and controls in 100KGP

media-23.xlsx (22.3KB, xlsx)
Supplement 24

Supplementary Table 11- Multi-ancestry summary of individuals carrying both APOE genotypes and protective or disease-modifying variants in patients and controls in UKB

media-24.xlsx (56.4KB, xlsx)
Supplement 25

Supplementary Table 12- Combined results of data for individuals carrying both APOE genotypes and protective or disease-modifying variants in patients and controls across AoU, UKB, ADSP, 100KGP, and AMP PD

media-25.xlsx (24.3KB, xlsx)
Supplement 26

Supplementary Table 13- Assessment of the protective model in ADSP

media-26.xlsx (17.7KB, xlsx)
Supplement 27

Supplementary Table 14- Assessment of the conditional model for APOE ε4 carriers in ADSP

media-27.xlsx (17.7KB, xlsx)
Supplement 28

Supplementary Table 15- Assessment of the conditional model for APOE ε4/ε4 genotype in ADSP

media-28.xlsx (17.7KB, xlsx)
Supplement 29

Supplementary Table 16- Assessment of the correlation model for APOE ε4 carriers in ADSP

media-29.xlsx (79.7KB, xlsx)
Supplement 30

Supplementary Table 17- Assessment of the correlation model for APOE ε4/ε4 genotype in ADSP

media-30.xlsx (18.8KB, xlsx)
Supplement 31

Supplementary Table 18- Assessment of the interaction model for APOE ε4 carriers in ADSP

media-31.xlsx (19.8KB, xlsx)
Supplement 32

Supplementary Table 19- Assessment of the interaction model for APOE ε4/ε4 genotype in ADSP

media-32.xlsx (19KB, xlsx)
Supplement 33

Supplementary Table 20- Assessment of the conditional model for APOE ε3/ε3 genotype in ADSP

media-33.xlsx (17.7KB, xlsx)
Supplement 34

Supplementary Table 21- Assessment of the correlation model for APOE ε3/ε3 genotype in ADSP

media-34.xlsx (19.1KB, xlsx)
Supplement 35

Supplementary Table 22- Assessment of the interaction model for APOE ε3/ε3 genotype in ADSP

media-35.xlsx (19.8KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgments

We thank Paige Brown Jarreau for her meticulous editing of this manuscript.

This work was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, the National Institute on Aging (NIA), National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services; project number ZO1 AG000535 and ZIA AG000949. This work utilized the computational resources of the NIH HPC Biowulf cluster. (http://hpc.nih.gov).

The All of Us Research Program is supported by the National Institutes of Health, Office of the Director: Regional Medical Centers: 1 OT2 OD026549; 1 OT2 OD026554; 1 OT2 OD026557; 1 OT2 OD026556; 1 OT2 OD026550; 1 OT2 OD 026552; 1 OT2 OD026553; 1 OT2 OD026548; 1 OT2 OD026551; 1 OT2 OD026555; IAA #: AOD 16037; Federally Qualified Health Centers: HHSN 263201600085U; Data and Research Center: 5 U2C OD023196; Biobank: 1 U24 OD023121; The Participant Center: U24 OD023176; Participant Technology Systems Center: 1 U24 OD023163; Communications and Engagement: 3 OT2 OD023205; 3 OT2 OD023206; and Community Partners: 1 OT2 OD025277; 3 OT2 OD025315; 1 OT2 OD025337; 1 OT2 OD025276. In addition, the All of Us Research Program would not be possible without the partnership of its participants.

This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under application number 33601.

This research was made possible through access to data in the National Genomic Research Library, which is managed by Genomics England Limited (a wholly owned company of the Department of Health and Social Care). The National Genomic Research Library holds data provided by patients and collected by the NHS as part of their care and data collected as part of their participation in research. The National Genomic Research Library is funded by the National Institute for Health Research and NHS England. The Wellcome Trust, Cancer Research UK and the Medical Research Council have also funded research infrastructure.

This research has been conducted using the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP) Resource under accession number NG00067. The data for this study were prepared, archived, and distributed by the National Institute on Aging Alzheimer’s Disease Data Storage Site (NIAGADS) at the University of Pennsylvania (U24-AG041689), funded by the National Institute on Aging.

This work was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (project number Z01-AG000949-02). Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the AMP PD Knowledge Platform. For up-to-date information on the study, please visit https://www.amp-pd.org. AMP PD—a public-private partnership—is managed by the FNIH and funded by Celgene, GSK, the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Verily. Clinical data and biosamples used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI), and the Parkinson’s Disease Biomarkers Program (PDBP). PPMI—a public-private partnership—is funded by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research and funding partners, including full names of all of the PPMI funding partners found at http://www.ppmi-info.org/fundingpartners. The PPMI Investigators have not participated in reviewing the data analysis or content of the manuscript. For up-to-date information on the study, visit http://www.ppmi-info.org. The Parkinson’s Disease Biomarker Program (PDBP) consortium is supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) at the National Institutes of Health. A full list of PDBP investigators can be found at https://pdbp.ninds.nih.gov/policy. The PDBP Investigators have not participated in reviewing the data analysis or content of the manuscript. PDBP sample and clinical data collection is supported under grants by NINDS: U01NS082134, U01NS082157, U01NS082151, U01NS082137, U01NS082148, and U01NS082133.

Footnotes

Potential Conflicts of Interest

FF, HL, MJK, MBM and MAN’s participation in this project was part of a competitive contract awarded to Data Tecnica LLC by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH). The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Data and code availability

The code used in this study can be found online at https://github.com/NIH-CARD/ADRD-GeneticDiversity-Biobanks,10.5281/zenodo.13363465.

References

  • 1.Sinha JK, Trisal A, Ghosh S, Gupta S, Singh KK, Han SS, et al. Psychedelics for alzheimer’s disease-related dementia: Unveiling therapeutic possibilities and pathways. Ageing Res Rev. 2024;96: 102211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.GBD 2019 Dementia Forecasting Collaborators. Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7: e105–e125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McKeith I, Mintzer J, Aarsland D, Burn D, Chiu H, Cohen-Mansfield J, et al. Dementia with Lewy bodies. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3: 19–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sagbakken M, Nåden D, Ulstein I, Kvaal K, Langhammer B, Rognstad M-K. Dignity in people with frontotemporal dementia and similar disorders - a qualitative study of the perspective of family caregivers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17: 432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jonson C, Levine KS, Lake J, Hertslet L, Jones L, Patel D, et al. Assessing the lack of diversity in genetics research across neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review of the GWAS Catalog and literature. medRxiv. 2024. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.08.24301007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.All of Us Research Program Investigators, Denny JC, Rutter JL, Goldstein DB, Philippakis A, Smoller JW, et al. The “All of Us” Research Program. N Engl J Med. 2019;381: 668–676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bycroft C, Freeman C, Petkova D, Band G, Elliott LT, Sharp K, et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature. 2018;562: 203–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bhattarai P, Gunasekaran TI, Belloy ME, Reyes-Dumeyer D, Jülich D, Tayran H, et al. Rare genetic variation in fibronectin 1 (FN1) protects against APOEε4 in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2024;147: 70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Arboleda-Velasquez JF, Lopera F, O’Hare M, Delgado-Tirado S, Marino C, Chmielewska N, et al. Resistance to autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease in an APOE3 Christchurch homozygote: a case report. Nat Med. 2019;25: 1680–1683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rajabli F, Beecham GW, Hendrie HC, Baiyewu O, Ogunniyi A, Gao S, et al. A locus at 19q13.31 significantly reduces the ApoE ε4 risk for Alzheimer’s Disease in African Ancestry. PLoS Genet. 2022;18: e1009977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Andrews SJ, Fulton-Howard B, Goate A. Protective Variants in Alzheimer’s Disease. Curr Genet Med Rep. 2019;7: 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Quiroz YT, Aguillon D, Aguirre-Acevedo DC, Vasquez D, Zuluaga Y, Baena AY, et al. Christchurch Heterozygosity and Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer’s Disease. N Engl J Med. 2024;390: 2156–2164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lopera F, Marino C, Chandrahas AS, O’Hare M, Villalba-Moreno ND, Aguillon D, et al. Resilience to autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease in a Reelin-COLBOS heterozygous man. Nat Med. 2023;29: 1243–1252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sassi C, Nalls MA, Ridge PG, Gibbs JR, Ding J, Lupton MK, et al. ABCA7 p.G215S as potential protective factor for Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;46: 235.e1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Minikel EV, Painter JL, Dong CC, Nelson MR. Refining the impact of genetic evidence on clinical success. Nature. 2024;629: 624–629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Multidirectional genetic and genomic data sharing in the All of Us research program. Genomic Data Sharing. Academic Press; 2023. pp. 39–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Harrison SM, Austin-Tse CA, Kim S, Lebo M, Leon A, Murdock D, et al. Harmonizing variant classification for return of results in the All of Us Research Program. Hum Mutat. 2022;43: 1114–1121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Venner E, Muzny D, Smith JD, Walker K, Neben CL, Lockwood CM, et al. Whole-genome sequencing as an investigational device for return of hereditary disease risk and pharmacogenomic results as part of the All of Us Research Program. Genome Med. 2022;14: 34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Conomos MP, Reiner AP, Weir BS, Thornton TA. Model-free Estimation of Recent Genetic Relatedness. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98: 127–148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V, Pollard MO, et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience. 2021;10. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience. 2015;4: 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Manichaikul A, Mychaleckyj JC, Rich SS, Daly K, Sale M, Chen W-M. Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics. 2010;26: 2867–2873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li S, Carss KJ, Halldorsson BV, Cortes A, UK Biobank Whole-Genome Sequencing Consortium. Whole-genome sequencing of half-a-million UK Biobank participants. medRxiv. 2023. p. 2023.12.06.23299426. doi: 10.1101/2023.12.06.23299426 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li H. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2011;27: 2987–2993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38: e164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.100,000 Genomes Project Pilot Investigators, Smedley D, Smith KR, Martin A, Thomas EA, McDonagh EM, et al. 100,000 Genomes Pilot on Rare-Disease Diagnosis in Health Care - Preliminary Report. N Engl J Med. 2021;385: 1868–1880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Smedley D, Jacobsen JOB, Jäger M, Köhler S, Holtgrewe M, Schubach M, et al. Nextgeneration diagnostics and disease-gene discovery with the Exomiser. Nat Protoc. 2015;10: 2004–2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81: 559–575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vitale D, Koretsky M, Kuznetsov N, Hong S, Martin J, James M, et al. GenoTools: An Open-Source Python Package for Efficient Genotype Data Quality Control and Analysis. bioRxiv. 2024. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.26.586362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Appel-Cresswell S, Vilarino-Guell C, Encarnacion M, Sherman H, Yu I, Shah B, et al. Alpha-synuclein p.H50Q, a novel pathogenic mutation for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2013;28: 811–813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Blauwendraat C, Kia DA, Pihlstrøm L, Gan-Or Z, Lesage S, Gibbs JR, et al. Insufficient evidence for pathogenicity of SNCA His50Gln (H50Q) in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2018;64: 159.e5–159.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rossi G, Giaccone G, Maletta R, Morbin M, Capobianco R, Mangieri M, et al. A family with Alzheimer disease and strokes associated with A713T mutation of the APP gene. Neurology. 2004;63: 910–912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Conidi ME, Bernardi L, Puccio G, Smirne N, Muraca MG, Curcio SAM, et al. Homozygous carriers of APP A713T mutation in an autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease family. Neurology. 2015;84: 2266–2273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Abbatemarco JR, Jones SE, Larvie M, Bekris LM, Khrestian ME, Krishnan K, et al. Amyloid Precursor Protein Variant, E665D, Associated With Unique Clinical and Biomarker Phenotype. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2021;36: 1533317520981225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Peacock ML, Murman DL, Sima AA, Warren JT Jr, Roses AD, Fink JK. Novel amyloid precursor protein gene mutation (codon 665Asp) in a patient with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 1994;35: 432–438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hsu S, Pimenova AA, Hayes K, Villa JA, Rosene MJ, Jere M, et al. Systematic validation of variants of unknown significance in APP, PSEN1 and PSEN2. Neurobiol Dis. 2020;139: 104817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Koprivica V, Stone DL, Park JK, Callahan M, Frisch A, Cohen IJ, et al. Analysis and classification of 304 mutant alleles in patients with type 1 and type 3 Gaucher disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66: 1777–1786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Arndt S, Heitner R, Lane A, Ramsay M. Glucocerebrosidase gene mutations in black South Africans with Gaucher disease. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2009;43: 129–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jeong S-Y, Park S-J, Kim HJ. Clinical and genetic characteristics of Korean patients with Gaucher disease. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2011;46: 11–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Beutler E, Gelbart T, Kuhl W, Zimran A, West C. Mutations in Jewish patients with Gaucher disease. Blood. 1992;79: 1662–1666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hong CM, Ohashi T, Yu XJ, Weiler S, Barranger JA. Sequence of two alleles responsible for Gaucher disease. DNA Cell Biol. 1990;9: 233–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tammachote R, Tongkobpetch S, Srichomthong C, Phipatthanananti K, Pungkanon S, Wattanasirichaigoon D, et al. A common and two novel GBA mutations in Thai patients with Gaucher disease. J Hum Genet. 2013;58: 594–599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kurolap A, Del Toro M, Spiegel R, Gutstein A, Shafir G, Cohen IJ, et al. Gaucher disease type 3c: New patients with unique presentations and review of the literature. Mol Genet Metab. 2019;127: 138–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Beutler E, Gelbart T, Scott CR. Hematologically important mutations: Gaucher disease. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2005;35: 355–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Amaral O, Lacerda L, Marcão A, Pinto E, Tamagnini G, Sá Miranda MC. Homozygosity for two mild glucocerebrosidase mutations of probable Iberian origin. Clin Genet. 1999;56: 100–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Montfort M, Chabás A, Vilageliu L, Grinberg D. Functional analysis of 13 GBA mutant alleles identified in Gaucher disease patients: Pathogenic changes and “modifier” polymorphisms. Hum Mutat. 2004;23: 567–575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Alfonso P, Aznarez S, Giralt M, Pocovi M, Giraldo P, Spanish Gaucher’s Disease Registry. Mutation analysis and genotype/phenotype relationships of Gaucher disease patients in Spain. J Hum Genet. 2007;52: 391–396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sheth J, Bhavsar R, Mistri M, Pancholi D, Bavdekar A, Dalal A, et al. Gaucher disease: single gene molecular characterization of one-hundred Indian patients reveals novel variants and the most prevalent mutation. BMC Med Genet. 2019;20: 31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Malini E, Grossi S, Deganuto M, Rosano C, Parini R, Dominisini S, et al. Functional analysis of 11 novel GBA alleles. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22: 511–516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kim JW, Liou BB, Lai MY, Ponce E, Grabowski GA. Gaucher disease: identification of three new mutations in the Korean and Chinese (Taiwanese) populations. Hum Mutat. 1996;7: 214–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Beutler E, Gelbart T, Demina A, Zimran A, LeCoutre P. Five new Gaucher disease mutations. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 1995;21: 20–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zampieri S, Cattarossi S, Bembi B, Dardis A. GBA Analysis in Next-Generation Era: Pitfalls, Challenges, and Possible Solutions. J Mol Diagn. 2017;19: 733–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Baker M, Mackenzie IR, Pickering-Brown SM, Gass J, Rademakers R, Lindholm C, et al. Mutations in progranulin cause tau-negative frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17. Nature. 2006;442: 916–919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bit-Ivan EN, Suh E, Shim H-S, Weintraub S, Hyman BT, Arnold SE, et al. A novel GRN mutation (GRN c.708+6_+9delTGAG) in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43positive inclusions: clinicopathologic report of 6 cases. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2014;73: 467–473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chiang H-H, Forsell C, Lilius L, Öijerstedt L, Thordardottir S, Shanmugarajan K, et al. Novel progranulin mutations with reduced serum-progranulin levels in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21: 1260–1265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Rademakers R, Baker M, Gass J, Adamson J, Huey ED, Momeni P, et al. Phenotypic variability associated with progranulin haploinsufficiency in patients with the common 1477C-->T (Arg493X) mutation: an international initiative. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6: 857–868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Orme T, Hernandez D, Ross OA, Kun-Rodrigues C, Darwent L, Shepherd CE, et al. Analysis of neurodegenerative disease-causing genes in dementia with Lewy bodies. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2020;8: 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.McKeith IG, Dickson DW, Lowe J, Emre M, O’Brien JT, Feldman H, et al. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: third report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology. 2005;65: 1863–1872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Vega IE, Cabrera LY, Wygant CM, Velez-Ortiz D, Counts SE. Alzheimer’s Disease in the Latino Community: Intersection of Genetics and Social Determinants of Health. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;58: 979–992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lee JH, Kahn A, Cheng R, Reitz C, Vardarajan B, Lantigua R, et al. Disease-related mutations among Caribbean Hispanics with familial dementia. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2014;2: 430–437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Masellis M, Momeni P, Meschino W, Heffner R Jr, Elder J, Sato C, et al. Novel splicing mutation in the progranulin gene causing familial corticobasal syndrome. Brain. 2006;129: 3115–3123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Steele NZ, Bright AR, Lee SE, Fong JC, Bonham LW, Karydas A, et al. Frequency of frontotemporal dementia gene variants in C9ORF72, MAPT, and GRN in academic versus commercial laboratory cohorts. Adv Genomics Genet. 2018;8: 23–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gass J, Cannon A, Mackenzie IR, Boeve B, Baker M, Adamson J, et al. Mutations in progranulin are a major cause of ubiquitin-positive frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15: 2988–3001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Gómez-Isla T, Wasco W, Pettingell WP, Gurubhagavatula S, Schmidt SD, Jondro PD, et al. A novel presenilin-1 mutation: increased beta-amyloid and neurofibrillary changes. Ann Neurol. 1997;41: 809–813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jiao B, Liu H, Guo L, Xiao X, Liao X, Zhou Y, et al. The role of genetics in neurodegenerative dementia: a large cohort study in South China. NPJ Genom Med. 2021;6: 69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Larner AJ, Ray PS, Doran M. The R269H mutation in presenilin-1 presenting as late-onset autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Sci. 2007;252: 173–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Cohn-Hokke PE, Wong TH, Rizzu P, Breedveld G, van der Flier WM, Scheltens P, et al. Mutation frequency of PRKAR1B and the major familial dementia genes in a Dutch early onset dementia cohort. J Neurol. 2014;261: 2085–2092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mann DM, Pickering-Brown SM, Takeuchi A, Iwatsubo T, Members of the Familial Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology Study Group. Amyloid angiopathy and variability in amyloid beta deposition is determined by mutation position in presenilin-1-linked Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Pathol. 2001;158: 2165–2175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ryan NS, Nicholas JM, Weston PSJ, Liang Y, Lashley T, Guerreiro R, et al. Clinical phenotype and genetic associations in autosomal dominant familial Alzheimer’s disease: a case series. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15: 1326–1335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Saito Y, Geyer A, Sasaki R, Kuzuhara S, Nanba E, Miyasaka T, et al. Early-onset, rapidly progressive familial tauopathy with R406W mutation. Neurology. 2002;58: 811–813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lindquist SG, Holm IE, Schwartz M, Law I, Stokholm J, Batbayli M, et al. Alzheimer disease-like clinical phenotype in a family with FTDP-17 caused by a MAPT R406W mutation. Eur J Neurol. 2008;15: 377–385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wojtas A, Heggeli KA, Finch N, Baker M, Dejesus-Hernandez M, Younkin SG, et al. C9ORF72 repeat expansions and other FTD gene mutations in a clinical AD patient series from Mayo Clinic. Am J Neurodegener Dis. 2012;1: 107–118. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.van Duijn CM, Hendriks L, Cruts M, Hardy JA, Hofman A, Van Broeckhoven C. Amyloid precursor protein gene mutation in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 1991;337: 978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Karlinsky H, Vaula G, Haines JL, Ridgley J, Bergeron C, Mortilla M, et al. Molecular and prospective phenotypic characterization of a pedigree with familial Alzheimer’s disease and a missense mutation in codon 717 of the beta-amyloid precursor protein gene. Neurology. 1992;42: 1445–1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Alcalay RN, Caccappolo E, Mejia-Santana H, Tang MX, Rosado L, Ross BM, et al. Frequency of known mutations in early-onset Parkinson disease: implication for genetic counseling: the consortium on risk for early onset Parkinson disease study. Arch Neurol. 2010;67: 1116–1122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kapasi A, Brosch JR, Nudelman KN, Agrawal S, Foroud TM, Schneider JA. A novel SNCA E83Q mutation in a case of dementia with Lewy bodies and atypical frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neuropathology. 2020;40: 620–626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lake J, Warly Solsberg C, Kim JJ, Acosta-Uribe J, Makarious MB, Li Z, et al. Multiancestry meta-analysis and fine-mapping in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28: 3121–3132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Belloy ME, Andrews SJ, Le Guen Y, Cuccaro M, Farrer LA, Napolioni V, et al. APOE Genotype and Alzheimer Disease Risk Across Age, Sex, and Population Ancestry. JAMA Neurol. 2023;80: 1284–1294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Lumsden AL, Mulugeta A, Zhou A, Hyppönen E. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotypeassociated disease risks: a phenome-wide, registry-based, case-control study utilising the UK Biobank. EBioMedicine. 2020;59: 102954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Sevigny J, Uspenskaya O, Heckman LD, Wong LC, Hatch DA, Tewari A, et al. Progranulin AAV gene therapy for frontotemporal dementia: translational studies and phase 1/2 trial interim results. Nat Med. 2024;30: 1406–1415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1

Supplementary Figure 1- PCA plots in (A) All of Us, (B) UKB, (C) ADSP, (D) AMP PD, and (E) 100 KGP.

media-1.pdf (476.2KB, pdf)
Supplement 2

Supplementary Figure 2- Heatmaps showing the frequencies of all identified variants in the discovery and replication phases across all ancestries in each biobank.

media-2.pdf (468.2KB, pdf)
Supplement 3

Supplementary Figure 3- Proportion of APOE genotypes in (A) Alzheimer’s disease, (B) related dementias, and (C) controls across 11 genetic ancestries.

Unknown genotypes and those absent across all ancestries were excluded from the analysis. Genotypes and ancestries not available in the 100KGP were also excluded.

media-3.pdf (723KB, pdf)
Supplement 4

Supplementary Figure 4- Proportions of individuals carrying both APOE ε4/ε4 genotypes and protective or disease-modifying variants across 11 genetic ancestries in Alzheimer’s disease, related dementias, and controls in all datasets.

Supplementary Figures 4A and 4C represent SNP distribution within each cohort, and Supplementary Figures 4B and 4D represent SNP distribution between cohorts. The total populations of each ancestry were used to generate 4A and 4B, while the total numbers of ε4/ε4 carriers for each ancestry were used to generate 4C and 4D. Supplementary Figures 4B and 4D show allele frequency ratios (AD-to-Control, left; Related dementias-to-Control, right) among APOE ε4/ε4 carriers for each of the candidate protective or disease-modifying variant, per ancestry. Warmer colors represent higher frequencies in cases versus controls, while cooler colors represent higher frequencies in controls versus cases, with dark blue (N/A) representing variants not present in either cases or controls.

media-4.pdf (322.5KB, pdf)
Supplement 5
media-5.pdf (87KB, pdf)
Supplement 6
media-6.pdf (1.8MB, pdf)
Supplement 7
media-7.pdf (594KB, pdf)
Supplement 8
media-8.pdf (571.4KB, pdf)
Supplement 9
media-9.pdf (608.7KB, pdf)
Supplement 10
media-10.pdf (842.8KB, pdf)
Supplement 11
media-11.pdf (147.5KB, pdf)
Supplement 12
media-12.pdf (836.4KB, pdf)
Supplement 13
media-13.pdf (143.1KB, pdf)
Supplement 14

Supplementary Table 1- Discovery phase: Multi-ancestry summary of all variants identified in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia cases in AoU

media-14.xlsx (42.9KB, xlsx)
Supplement 15

Supplementary Table 2- Discovery phase: Multi-ancestry summary of all variants identified in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia cases in UKB

media-15.xlsx (150.2KB, xlsx)
Supplement 16

Supplementary Table 3- Discovery phase: Multi-ancestry summary of all variants identified in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia cases in 100KGP

media-16.xlsx (11.9KB, xlsx)
Supplement 17

Supplementary Table 4- Multi-ancestry summary of variants previously reported as potential disease-causing but identified in controls in multiple databases in this study

media-17.xlsx (12.9KB, xlsx)
Supplement 18

Supplementary Table 5- Phenotypic data for all individuals carrying known and novel potential disease-causing variants in the discovery phase

media-18.xlsx (29.3KB, xlsx)
Supplement 19

Supplementary Table 6- Phenotypic data for all individuals carrying known and novel potential disease-causing variants in the replication phase

media-19.xlsx (114.8KB, xlsx)
Supplement 20

Supplementary Table 7- Multi-ancestry summary of individuals carrying both APOE genotypes and protective or disease-modifying variants in patients and controls in AoU

media-20.xlsx (60.1KB, xlsx)
Supplement 21

Supplementary Table 8- Multi-ancestry summary of individuals carrying both APOE genotypes and protective or disease-modifying variants in patients and controls in ADSP

media-21.xlsx (53.7KB, xlsx)
Supplement 22

Supplementary Table 9- Multi-ancestry summary of individuals carrying both APOE genotypes and protective or disease-modifying variants in patients and controls in AMP PD

media-22.xlsx (39.4KB, xlsx)
Supplement 23

Supplementary Table 10- Multi-ancestry summary of individuals carrying both APOE genotypes and protective or disease-modifying variants in patients and controls in 100KGP

media-23.xlsx (22.3KB, xlsx)
Supplement 24

Supplementary Table 11- Multi-ancestry summary of individuals carrying both APOE genotypes and protective or disease-modifying variants in patients and controls in UKB

media-24.xlsx (56.4KB, xlsx)
Supplement 25

Supplementary Table 12- Combined results of data for individuals carrying both APOE genotypes and protective or disease-modifying variants in patients and controls across AoU, UKB, ADSP, 100KGP, and AMP PD

media-25.xlsx (24.3KB, xlsx)
Supplement 26

Supplementary Table 13- Assessment of the protective model in ADSP

media-26.xlsx (17.7KB, xlsx)
Supplement 27

Supplementary Table 14- Assessment of the conditional model for APOE ε4 carriers in ADSP

media-27.xlsx (17.7KB, xlsx)
Supplement 28

Supplementary Table 15- Assessment of the conditional model for APOE ε4/ε4 genotype in ADSP

media-28.xlsx (17.7KB, xlsx)
Supplement 29

Supplementary Table 16- Assessment of the correlation model for APOE ε4 carriers in ADSP

media-29.xlsx (79.7KB, xlsx)
Supplement 30

Supplementary Table 17- Assessment of the correlation model for APOE ε4/ε4 genotype in ADSP

media-30.xlsx (18.8KB, xlsx)
Supplement 31

Supplementary Table 18- Assessment of the interaction model for APOE ε4 carriers in ADSP

media-31.xlsx (19.8KB, xlsx)
Supplement 32

Supplementary Table 19- Assessment of the interaction model for APOE ε4/ε4 genotype in ADSP

media-32.xlsx (19KB, xlsx)
Supplement 33

Supplementary Table 20- Assessment of the conditional model for APOE ε3/ε3 genotype in ADSP

media-33.xlsx (17.7KB, xlsx)
Supplement 34

Supplementary Table 21- Assessment of the correlation model for APOE ε3/ε3 genotype in ADSP

media-34.xlsx (19.1KB, xlsx)
Supplement 35

Supplementary Table 22- Assessment of the interaction model for APOE ε3/ε3 genotype in ADSP

media-35.xlsx (19.8KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The code used in this study can be found online at https://github.com/NIH-CARD/ADRD-GeneticDiversity-Biobanks,10.5281/zenodo.13363465.


Articles from medRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES