Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

medRxiv logoLink to medRxiv
[Preprint]. 2024 Dec 7:2024.11.13.24316066. Originally published 2024 Nov 13. [Version 2] doi: 10.1101/2024.11.13.24316066

Diagnostic-avoiding Chlamydia trachomatis variants detected in cervical and endometrial specimens from women during 16S microbiome profiling

Sangmi Jeong, Tammy Tollison, Hayden Brochu, Hsuan Chou, Tammy Yu, Priyanka Baghaie, Kacy S Yount, Toni Darville, Harold C Wiesenfeld, Sharon L Hillier, Xinxia Peng, Catherine M O'Connell
PMCID: PMC11601777  PMID: 39606371

Abstract

Background: Performance of a 16S rRNA analysis of the cervicovaginal microbiome of 220 participants recruited into the T Cell Response against Chlamydia (TRAC) cohort between February 2011 and August 2014 in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania USA detected DNA encoding chlamydial 16S rRNA in samples from seven participants whose tests were negative for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and DNA encoding gonococcal 16S rRNA from five participants whose tests were negative for Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infection with the Aptima Combo2 assay (Hologic). Methods: We used targeted PCR amplification followed by sequencing to characterize the chlamydial 23S rRNA locus and qPCR to detect gonococcal DNA in residual diagnostic swab eluates or DNA used to generate 16S rRNA libraries. Results: Discrepant specimens that contained chlamydial DNA carried a diagnostic-avoidant, G1526A variant in the 23S rRNA locus identical to variants previously detected in Finland, Denmark, and the UK. PCR validation of gonococcal DNA was confirmed for all participants whose tests were negative, with stochastic effects consistent with infection levels close to the limit of detection by the diagnostic assay. Conclusions: These data indicate that this probe-avoidant CT mutant, and possibly others, were circulating in the northeastern US prior to their detection and characterization in 2019. Although infrequent, documentation of false negative results for CT indicates a need for clinicians to consider performance of a second test that uses alternate PCR targets if patients have persistent symptoms or have known contact to an infected sex partner and their initial NAAT is negative.

Full Text Availability

The license terms selected by the author(s) for this preprint version do not permit archiving in PMC. The full text is available from the preprint server.


Articles from medRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES