Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2024 Nov 27;18(11):e0012674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012674

Vision guides the twilight search for oviposition sites of the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus

Si Yu Zhao 1,#, Hong Kai Liu 1,#, Zhen Sheng Xie 1,#, Yi Ming Wu 1, Pei Lin Wu 1, Tong Liu 1, Wen Qiang Yang 1, Jing Wu 1, JunYu Fu 1, Chun Mei Wang 1, Anthony A James 2,3, Xiao-Guang Chen 1,*
Editor: Joshua B Benoit4
PMCID: PMC11602101  PMID: 39602395

Abstract

Background

Oviposition site selection is an important component of vector mosquito reproductive biology. The Asian Tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus, is a major and important vector of arboviruses including Dengue. Previous studies documented the preference of gravid females for small, dark-colored water containers as oviposition sites, which they sought during the twilight period (dusk) of their locomotor activity. Vision plays an important role in this behavior, and factors such as the shape, size, and color of the container, light intensity, polarization, spectrum, and other visual cues guide the search for suitable oviposition sites, but the mechanistic factors driving this behavior are unclear.

Methodology/Principal findings

We blindfolded adult female compound eyes and observed the effects of a lack of vision on the ability to discriminate and utilize preferred oviposition sites. Furthermore, the transcriptomes of blindfolded mosquitoes were screened to identify genes with vision-sensitive expression profiles and gene-editing was used to create non-functional mutations in two of them, rhodopsin-like (mutation designated ‘rho-l△807’) and kynurenine hydroxylase (mutation designated ‘khw’). Behavioral tests of both mutant and control strains revealed that the rho-l△807 mutant mosquitoes had a significant decrease in their ability to search for preferred oviposition sites that correlated with a reduced ability to recognize long-wavelength red light. The khw mutant mosquitoes also had a reduced ability to identify preferred oviposition sites that correlated with reductions in their ability to respond to variations in daily brightness and their ability to discriminate among different color options of the containers and background monochromatic light.

Conclusions/Significance

This study underscores the importance of visual cues in the oviposition site selection behavior of adult female Ae. albopictus. We demonstrate that wild-type rho-l and kh gene products play a crucial role in this behavior, as mutants exhibit altered sensitivity or recognition of light intensity and substrate colors.

Author summary

Aedes albopictus (Asian Tiger mosquito) relies on vision to select oviposition sites, favoring small, dark containers during twilight hours. To understand the underlying mechanisms, we blindfolded female mosquitoes and screened their transcriptomes, identifying rho-l and kh genes as potential vision-related factors. Gene editing experiments provided crucial insights into the roles of rho-l and kh in Ae. albopictus oviposition behavior. Mutants lacking functional rho-l (rho-l△807) exhibited a significant decrease in their sensitivity to long-wavelength red light, leading to a reduced ability to locate preferred oviposition sites. Similarly, khw mutants displayed a decreased ability to respond to variations in daily brightness, as well as a reduced capacity to discriminate between different colors. This impaired color discrimination and sensitivity to brightness changes directly affected their ability to identify preferred oviposition sites. These findings highlight the crucial role of rho-l and kh in mosquito visual-mediated oviposition site selection, providing valuable insights into mosquito behavior and potential targets for vector control.

Introduction

Aedes albopictus is an important vector of arboviruses, transmitting diseases such as dengue fever, Zika virus disease, and chikungunya fever, highlighting the urgent need for effective vector control strategies to mitigate these significant public health threats [13]. This mosquito also is one of the most invasive species in the world, having spread in less than 50 years from its original habitat in Asia to all parts of the globe except Antarctica. Different mosquitoes prefer different oviposition sites and Aedes sp. mosquitoes prefer to lay eggs in small containers of standing water (e.g. pots, cans, tires, [47]). Three-quarters of the growth and development of mosquitoes, including eggs, larvae, and pupae, are completed in the water in the oviposition site [8], and the adult insects disperse following emergence. Therefore, the oviposition sites are a crucial location for mosquito control. Various mosquito sensory organs play an important role in the search for oviposition sites [9,10]. Previous studies showed that mosquitoes use their olfactory capabilities to detect the presence of suitable oviposition sites that are characterized by the moisture level and specific odors emitted by microorganisms in the water [8,1113].Additionally, visual cues, such as the shape, size, and color of the container, as well as light intensity, polarization, and spectrum, also play a crucial role in guiding mosquitoes to appropriate oviposition sites [5,1421].The main visual organ of an adult mosquito is the compound eye, which is made up of many individual ommatidia. Each of these ommatidia can see a small part of the field of view individually, and the field of view of all the ommatidia is combined to form a complete visual image of the mosquito [22,23]. Ommatidia exhibit uniform morphology, each comprising a cornea, crystalline cone, retinal cells, pigment cells, and a basement membrane. Each ommatidium houses eight photoreceptor cells, designated R1-R8, with the majority of opsins localized to these retinal cells [24]. Several opsins have been identified in mosquitoes [21,25,26], of which 10 have been identified in Ae. albopictus [27]. Different opsins can sense different wavelengths of light [28]. The photoreceptor pathway converts the light signal into electrical and chemical signals that are transmitted to the nerve cells in the brain [29,30].

Previous studies showed that Aedes sp. mosquitoes prefer to find oviposition sites at dusk during the twilight period of their locomotor activity, and prefer dark containers with small amounts of water [17,31,32].The specific visual cues and molecular mechanisms for this significant reproductive behavior are unclear, and in this study, we used black acrylic pigment applied to the compound eyes of Ae. albopictus (blindfolding) to block the visual pathway [27,33] to assess whether the oviposition site searching behavior was affected by vision. The transcriptome sequencing of samples from both the blindfolded compound eye treatment and the control groups identified differentially-expressed vision-related genes. This approach allows for further exploration of the role and mechanisms associated with the search for oviposition sites.

Materials and methods

Mosquito strains and breeding

The Ae. albopictus Foshan strain was donated by the Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention and was raised in the laboratory under the following conditions: temperature 27±1°C, relative humidity (RH) 65±10%, light for 14 hours, darkness for 10 hours. The mosquitoes used in the experiment all emerged within 1 week. The blindfolded test used mosquitoes 2 days after the blood-feeding, while the search test used mosquitoes 3 days after the blood-feeding.

Compound eye blindfolded test

Mosquito compound eyes are the principle organs that receive light, and as such, have an important role in both circadian and responsive activities [34,35]. Female mosquitoes were selected two days after a full bloodmeal, and the compound eyes were blindfolded with opaque, black water-soluble acrylic pigment (793, Marie’s) with a brush (0000# drawing pen, Xie DeTang) [27,33]. The pigment has no pungent odor and has been used previously in Ae. albopictus [27]. The pigment was blended on a slide with deionized water and tested with a photometer (model OHSP-350C, Hangzhou Rainbow Spectrum) to ensure light transmittance of less than 0.1%. The mosquitoes were allowed to recover for 24 hours under blind conditions before proceeding with the experiments. Each mosquito was treated with 100 μL of soluble acrylic pigment.

Compound eye blindfolded effect detection

In order to test the shading effect of blindfolding, shadow selection experiments were carried out between blindfolded female mosquitoes and control female mosquitoes three days after blood-feeding and mating. Female mosquitoes were anesthetized with carbon dioxide and 20 of them per trial are placed into a plexiglass cylindrical container measuring 600mm in length, with an outer diameter of 80mm, an inner diameter of 74mm, and a wall thickness of 3mm. The two ends of the container are fixed and closed with gauze, and the two sides are covered with black cloth. Organic containers are placed horizontally. After 1 hour, the number of female mosquitoes distributed on both sides are counted and the shadow index is calculated as the number of mosquitoes in black environment—number of mosquitoes in light environment)/total number. The shadow index was used as a measurement with the higher the index, the stronger the orientation of the mosquitoes towards darkness. This experiment was conducted on both control and blindfolded groups with nine replicates each for statistical robustness.

Mosquito oviposition site search experiments

Three-hole Mosq-ovitrap is a common container for monitoring mosquito density in breeding sites, which consists of a transparent cylindrical plastic jar with a concave bottom and a black top with three tapered holes [36]. Two three-hole Mosq-ovitrap were placed diagonally in a 1 m3 mosquito cage with temperature maintained at 28~30° C and humidity at 40~50%. A total of 100ml of dechlorinated water was added to one and the other was left empty.

Twenty gravid mosquitoes were put into mosquito cages after 3 days after a bloodmeal, and the number of gravid mosquitoes in the three-hole Mosq-ovitrap was recorded six hours later (12:00pm-18:00pm). The search index is the number of mosquitoes in the water-filled three-hole Mosq-ovitrap /total mosquito numbers. The search indices of compound eye blindfolded and control mosquitoes were measured and the experiments repeated six times for each group.

Transcriptome sequencing

We compared the expression of visual genes associated with the phototransduction pathway during oviposition site selection in mosquitoes with and without blindfolded compound eyes. Test group: One hundred of female mosquitoes were blindfolded on their compound eyes 48 hours after blood feeding, then released into a 1m3 mosquito net. Two three-hole oviposition traps were placed diagonally in the net, one containing 100 ml of deionized water and the other empty. Heads of female mosquitoes that flew into the three-hole Mosq-ovitrap with water were collected and stored in TRIZOL, then 30 individuals were pooled for sequencing. Control group: One hundred of female mosquitoes without compound eye blindfolded treatment were kept in the same rearing environment and batch as the test group. They were released into a 1m3 mosquito net 72 hours after blood feeding. Two three-hole oviposition traps were placed diagonally in the net, one containing 100 ml of deionized water and the other empty. Heads of female mosquitoes that flew into the three-hole Mosq-ovitrap with water were collected and stored in TRIZOL, then 30 individuals were pooled for sequencing. A total of three biological replicates. The samples were sent to Beijing Novogene Sequencing Company for transcriptome sequencing. Transcriptome sequencing was repeated three times in both experimental and control groups. RNA integrity and total volume was measured accurately using the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer. Qualified libraries were pooled and Illumina sequencing carried out to generate 150 base-paired (bp) end read. Raw data was filtered to remove reads with adapters, those containing N (indicating that base information cannot be determined) and low-quality reads (Qphred<-20 base number accounts for more than 50% of the entire read length), and at the same time, the Q20, Q30 and GC content of the clean data were calculated. All subsequent analyses are conducted with the high-quality clean data. This filtration procedure resulted in clean reads suitable for subsequent bioinformatics analysis (see: https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/all/GCF/006/496/715/GCF_006496715.2_Aalbo_primary.1/).

Differential expression analysis between the two comparison groups was performed using the DESeq2 software (version 1.20.0). DESeq2 provides statistical procedures to identify differentially expressed genes in digital gene expression data using a model based on the negative binomial distribution. The resulting p-values were adjusted using the Benjamini-Hochberg method to control the false discovery rate. Genes with an adjusted P< 0.05 were considered differentially expressed as identified by DESeq2.Visually relevant genes were identified among the differentially accumulated transcripts based on their functional annotation and gene description. The NCBI Blastn tool was used to validate the accuracy of gene sequencing and naming. Here we focused on the down regulated genes and identified 6 genes related to opsin synthesis in the head: opsin-1 (LOC10942179), opsin-2 (LOC109399710), opsin-3-like (LOC115260659), opsin-1-like (LOC109422560), rhodopsin-like (LOC115254593), kynurenine 3-monooxygenase (LOC109403230). We defined genes with a fold change (FC) of more than 1-fold (log2FC≥0) and a P< 0.05 as significantly differentially expressed genes, and the remaining list of differentially-expressed genes was included in the S4 Table.

Reverse Transcription-Quantitative Real-time PCR detection of rho-l and kh gene transcripts

Two-day post-blood-fed mosquitoes were treated with the acrylic pigment and allowed to recover for 24 hours. The head was removed and pools of five represented one biological replicate. A total of three biological replicates were performed. Control mosquitoes were treated similarly except for the application of the acrylic paint. The same sample sizes and replicates were collected and analyzed. Although there are five genes associated with opsin in the head transcriptome, we selected the rhodopsin-like gene with the differential fold, which is not a gene in opsin 1–10 identified in Ae. albopictus [27]. Under normal circumstances, opsins in compound eyes can bind with G proteins and initiate downstream phototransduction pathways [37,38].

We have discovered that the rhodopsin-like gene has an amino acid structure similar to that of opsins, leading us to hypothesize that this gene also has a photosensitive function, thereby influencing mosquitoes’ behavior in seeking breeding sites through visual pathways. Meanwhile, Kynurenine 3-monooxygenase is an expressed product of KMO (LOC109403230), a member of the kynurenine metabolic pathway and has been shown to be an important monooxygenase in the tryptophan pathway [39]. Deletion mutations in the KMO gene and the resulting phenotypic changes were first identified in Aedes aegypti. The gene encoding this enzyme is called kynurenine hydroxylase (kh) and the mutant allele producing white eyes is called khw [40]. kynurenine-3-monooxygenase is associated with tryptophan metabolism and synthesis in pigment cells, which regulate the amount of light entering and shield stray light [41,42], and are also analyzed by RT-qPCR. We anticipate that the decreased level of light entering the compound eye will result in a decrease in the accumulation of transcripts from light-sensitive genes [26].

The dissected tissues were transferred into 1.5 ml RNase-free EP tubes containing 50 μL of Trizol (Ambion, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, United States). Total RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer’s protocol with Trizol reagent and dissolved in 20 μL of RNase-free water or DEPC-treated water. RNA was used for quantitative analysis using a Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Technologies, the USA), and the concentration and 260/280 ratio were recorded. A 4ul volume of RNA was retained, and the rest was stored at -80°C. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from DNaseI-treated total RNA using an oligo-(dT) primer and GoScript Reverse Transcription System kit (Promega Corporation, Madison WI, USA). RT-qPCR was performed at 95°C for 10s and 60°C for 15s, 72°C, for 20s with a total of 40 cycles. Relative expression levels of kh(LOC109403230) and rho-l (LOC115254593) transcripts were calculated as 2−ΔΔCt and normalized to the actin-5C reference gene (LOC109405344) transcript levels in the same cDNA samples. The primers used for gene expression analysis are shown in S2 Table.

CRISPR/Cas9 editing experiments of rho-l and kh genes

Gene editing is a powerful tool for functional analysis. Following identification of target genes through transcriptome data screening and validation with RT-qPCR, we performed knockout experiments for the rho-l and kh genes. A dual sgRNA knockout strategy was used to produce a large deletion in the genome using the online tool, CRISPOR (http://crispor.tefor.net) to identify appropriate guide RNAs (sgRNAs) specifically targeting 20 bp of the site.

The injection mixes contained 300 ng/ul Cas9 Protein (Thermos Fisher Scientific), 100 ng/ul purified sgRNA1 and 100 ng/ul purified sgRNA2 added to RNase-free water. Two sgRNAs targeting the first and second exons were included with the Cas9 endonuclease in an injection mixture and this was microinjected into embryos at 1h after egg deposition. The injection mixtures were incubated for 15 min at 37°C to reconstitute active ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) and then injected into phenotypically wild-type Foshan strain embryos using described procedures [4345]. Interbreeding allowed the recovery of a homozygous line of a single mutant type by the G3 generation. The nucleotide sequence of the deletion mutation was obtained from a commercial sequencing company. To initiate the process, retrieve the protein sequence of rho-l. Subsequently, access the Swiss-Model website(https://swissmodel.expasy.org/) and select the automated modeling option to automatically generate a protein structure model. The amino acid structure of rho-l was mapped based on the results of the protein model.

The kh gene CRISPR/Cas9 edited strain, khw is derived from a previously-constructed gene knockout strain [44].

Color bidirectional selection experiments

We were intrigued by the observation that Ae. albopictus mosquitoes preferentially seek out black oviposition containers during the twilight hours. Based on the characteristics of twilight and the mosquitoes’ preference for black oviposition containers, we conducted an oviposition preference experiment comparing black containers with those of other colors. The two egg-laying cups (black or white, black or blue, black or green, black or yellow, black or red) were placed in a 1m3 mosquito cage and 100ml of dechlorinated water was added to each. Ten gravid females were released into each cage, and the number of eggs deposited into each oviposition cup was recorded 24 hours later. Oviposition activity index (OVI) = (Number of eggs in non-black control cups–Number of eggs in black cups) / Total number of eggs laid in the experiment. The calculation of each data is based on the comparison of the number of eggs in black or other-colored cups in one experiment. The more the oviposition activity index tends to -1, the more the gravid mosquito prefer the black oviposition cup. The oviposition activity index was calculated for a total of 6–8 repeats. For a clear visual representation of the experimental process, a flowchart is presented in S3 Fig.

Mosquito attraction to different brightness levels of light

Brightness is not constant throughout the day and the light intensities at noon, dusk and night can vary greatly [46]. Twilight is characterized by varying light intensities. To investigate this, we conducted attraction experiments under three different light conditions. A three-hole Mosq-ovitrap with 100ml dechlorinated water was placed in a 23cm×20cm×20cm mosquito cage, and the brightness of an LED lamp above the mosquito cage was adjusted to 0 lux (dark), 130 lux (twilight) or 1600 lux (daylight) [47]. Brightness is measured by an illuminance measuring instrument (Model OHSP-350C, Hangzhou Rainbow Spectrum). Thirty 3-day post-blooded females were placed into the cage, and the numbers of mosquitoes flying into the three-hole oviposition trap were recorded one hour later. A total of nine repetitions were performed.

Mosquito attraction to different monochromatic light

Behavioral experiments with different light intensities (illuminance), colors of oviposition containers, and monochromatic light exposure were carried out to determine the role of the wild-type rho-l gene product in oviposition site choice. A three-hole oviposition trap containing 100ml of deionized water was placed in a 23cm×20cm×20cm mosquito cage under blue (460nm), green (520nm) or red (630nm) light wavelengths. Thirty 3-day post-blooded females were put into the mosquito cage, and the numbers of mosquitoes flying into the three-hole oviposition trap were recorded one hour later. A total of six replicates were performed for each group.

Locomotor Activity analysis of the rho-l mutant strain of Aedes albopictus

Ae. albopictus wild-type strain and rho-lΔ807 strain were reared in a standardized mosquito rearing room until adult mosquitoes, anaesthetized with CO2, and then fully mated females of 3–5 days old were selected and placed on a Locomotor Activity Monitoring System (TriKinetics, LAM25) for activity monitoring. Activity monitoring is a routine method of assessing the capacity of insects, and Drosophila ‘(Diptera)’ is more commonly used, measured by the number of flights through the infrared detection window. At present, Drosophila activity monitor has been widely used in mosquito activity monitoring [4851].

The activity monitor was placed in a climatic chamber with the following conditions: temperature 27±1°C, humidity 75%, light cycle LD = 12h:12h, with the light on time ZT0 (9:00am) and off time ZT12 (21:00pm), and monitored continuously for 7 days under the LD light conditions. The first three days of the LD phase are an adaptation period, while the subsequent four days are the formal monitoring period.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics). All data were tested first to determine if they followed a normal distribution using a Shapiro-Wilk normality test (α = 0.05). The independent sample t-test was used for comparison of the search index, mRNA relative expression levels of rho-l and kh genes, oviposition activity indices, mosquito numbers trapped by different brightness, mosquito numbers trapped by different monochromic light regimens, activity monitoring. One-way ANOVA was used to compare oviposition indices across multiple groups. A value of P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The relevant statistics are already available in S5 Table.

Results

The adult compound eye of female Aedes albopictus plays an important role during the search for small water containers as oviposition sites

We blindfolded adult female mosquitoes with acrylic pigment to test if vision affects their ability to search oviposition sites (Fig 1A).

Fig 1. Compound eye blindfolding and its effect on the search for oviposition sites.

Fig 1

(a) Compound eye blindfolding and pattern diagram. The top images are a photo (left) and schematic representation (right) of the control eyes and the bottom images show a blindfolded specimen. The scale size is 0.1mm. (b) Two three-hole egg traps are placed inside the 1m3 tent, one with water and one blank. Effect of compound eye blindfolding on oviposition sites of gravid mosquitoes (t-test, ***, P<0.001). (c) Compound eye blindfolding results in differential expression of vision-related genes. (d) RT-qPCR detection of rho-l and kh gene transcripts after blindfolding compound eyes (t-test, *, P<0.05). Data in (b) and (d) are represented as means ± SEM. CE- Normal means compound eye normal, and CE-blindfolded means compound eye blindfolded.

The shadow index of control mosquitoes was 0.31±0.04 while that of blindfolded insects, -0.21±0.09, was significantly lower (S1 Fig, t = 5.06, df = 16, P<0.05), indicating that the pigment application effectively blocked or lowered the level of incoming light and hindered light perception.

We built a model to record the search index (Fig 1B). The results showed that the search index was 0.51±0.04 for the compound eye blindfolded group and 0.70±0.03 for the mosquitoes in the normal compound eye group, and the difference between the two was statistically significant (Fig 1B, t = 3.215, df = 10, P<0. 01), indicating that compound eye blindfolded mosquitoes had a reduced ability to search for small pools of water in the container type compared to normal mosquitoes and suggesting that compound eye blindfolding affected the ability of Ae. albopictus to search for oviposition sites.

A comparative analysis of the transcriptomes of the blindfolded and control groups showed that six genes related to vision were regulated differentially with five showing reduced and one showing increased accumulation using |log2FoldChange|≥0 and p value <0.05 as the screening criteria (Fig 1C). The rhodopsin-encoding gene, rho-l (gene ID 115254593), showed significant reductions in transcript accumulation (S4 Table; log2FC = -1.81) compared with controls (Negative binomial distribution, P <0.001). Furthermore, RT-qPCR detection also showed that the relative expression of rho-l transcripts decreased significantly with blindfolding (Fig 1D, t = 3.345, df = 4, P <0.001), supporting the conclusion that the gene may be involved in compound eye-mediated light detection.

Transcriptomic data and RT-qPCR analyses show that the accumulation of kh transcripts decreased significantly in blindfolded mosquitoes compared to controls (S4 Table and Fig 1C and 1D). The combined results support the conclusion that the rho-l and kh genes are responsive to light levels and we posit that they may have a role in the compound eye in the search for oviposition sites.

The rho-l gene product is essential for detecting long-wavelength red light during oviposition site searches

The rho-l gene transcript was reduced the most of all vision-related gene products in blindfolded mosquitoes compared to controls in the RNA-seq analyses (S4 Table). RT-qPCR results confirmed this reduction in accumulation and therefore we used CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology to generate mutant mosquitoes with an ablation of the rho-l gene and analyze its function. The rho-l has two exons and a single intron and produces a transcript with a total length of 1632 base-pairs (bp) (Fig 2A).

Fig 2. Functional analysis of a rho-l ablation mutation.

Fig 2

(a) Schematic diagram of the rho-l gene mutation. (b) rho-l protein structure: “outside” means extracellular, “inside” means intracellular, “delete” means the transmembrane domain is deleted. (c) Comparison of mRNA accumulation levels between wild-type control and rho-l△807 mutant lines during development. “3d Female” represents the female mosquito three days after emerging, “3d Male” represents male mosquitoes three days after emerging. (d) Comparison of search indices between wild-type control and rho-l△807 (***P <0.001). (e) Comparison between the numbers of wild type and rho-l△807 mosquitoes in the traps under the brightness conditions of 0, 130 and 1600 lux (**P<0.01 and ***P<0.001, n = 9). (f) Bidirectional selection on two-color oviposition cups. Comparison of egg-inducing index between wild-type control and rho-l△807 on black-white, black-green, black-yellow, black-blue, and black-red oviposition cups (**P<0.01, NS. P>0.05, n = 6). Oviposition activity index = (Number of eggs in non-black control cups–Number of eggs in black cups) / Total number of eggs laid in the experiment. (g) Comparison of the number of by wild type control and rho-l△807 mosquitoes attracted under red (center wavelength 630nm), blue (center wavelength 460nm) and green (center wavelength 520nm) light (**P<0.01 and NS. P>0.05, n = 6). Data in (d), (e), (f) and (g) are represented as means ± SEM, and Student’s t test was used (NS. P>0.05, *, P<0.05, **, P<0.01, ***, P<0.001).

Based on the results of this analysis, we created a structural diagram of the amino acids in rho-l (Fig 2B). Rho-l mutations were found in the resulting G0 adult mosquitoes, with four mutant adults identified from a total of 340 injected embryos (S3 Table). A homozygous mutant line with an 807 bp deletion was identified in the G3 generation (Fig 2A and S1 Table). The rho-l△807 product has only two of the seven transmembrane domains resulting in deletions of the conserved retinal binding and G-protein coupling sites (Fig 2B) [52]. Analysis of the expression profiles of mutant mosquito larvae, pupae, and 3-day post-eclosion adults showed that the rho-l△807 mRNA was not expressed (Fig 2C). As an important opsin, the expression level of this gene in controls increased gradually from larval to pupal stage to adult stage, indicating that the main physiological function stage of this gene was required in the adult stage. Behavioral experiments showed that the search index of wild-type gravid mosquitoes flying into the three-hole Mosq-ovitrap was 0.70±0.02, while that of rho-l△807 mutant strain, 0.47±0.02, was significantly lower (Fig 2D, t = 6.26, df = 10, P <0.001). The reduced ability of the rho-l△807 mutant strain to find oviposition sites supports the conclusion that the wild-type product plays an important role in the visual process of oviposition site searching.

Behavioral experiments with different light intensities (illuminance), colors of oviposition containers, and monochromatic light exposure were carried out to determine the role of the wild-type rho-l gene product in oviposition site. The trapping results of control wild-type gravid mosquitoes differed under the three conditions. The maximum numbers of mosquitoes caught at 0 (night), 130 (dusk), and 1600 lux (day) were 5.10±0.92, 23.00±0.71 and 16.73±1.62 respectively (Fig 2E). Ae. albopictus females require a certain illuminance to search for oviposition sites, and the 130 lux near the dusk stage is optimal. The trapping numbers, 1.11±0.20, 11.44±0.81, and 8.89±0.96, of the rho-l△807 strain at 0, 130, and 1600 lux, respectively, were significantly lower than those of the wild type (Fig 2E, t = 4.22, df = 9.8, P<0.001; t = 10.68, df = 16, P<0.001; t = 4.16, df = 16; P<0.01), indicating that the product of the rho-l gene has a role in the perception of light intensity and deletion of the gene will affect recognition of light intensity and the ensuing search for oviposition sites. Regarding the decreased searching ability of the rho-l strain in a dark environment, one reason is the impact on its activity. We monitored the activity of the rho-l△807 strain under LD light conditions (S2 Fig). Ae. albopictus wild-type and rho-l△807 strain both showed a clear bimodal activity pattern with a morning peak around lights on and an evening peak around lights off (S2A Fig). Compared with the wild-type, the activity of rho-l△807 strain was significantly weakened during both daytime and nighttime (S2B Fig, t = 2.91, df = 6, P<0.05; t = 5.3, df = 6, P<0.01), and its flight activity was indeed affected. Another potential reason for the reduced searching ability could be that the rho-l△807 strain relies on light recognition, and it may need a longer time to adapt to changes in the light-dark environment. Our experimental trapping period was only 1 hour, which might not have been sufficient for this adaptation. These data support the conclusion that rho-l gene products are one of the visual determinants for Ae. albopictus oviposition site searching.

The oviposition activity index of wild-type controls was 0.53±0.11, -0.60±0.08, -0.74±0.08, -0.47±0.08 and -0.38±0.33 in black-white, black-blue, black-green, black-yellow and black-red choices, respectively (Fig 2F). While the results show that the wild-type mosquitoes all preferred black oviposition containers, the differences were not statistically significant (Fig 2F, F = 2.62, P >0.05). The black and red results here do not show that the rho-l strain of mosquito has an increased tendency towards red containers, but rather an inability to recognize red containers. While there were no statistically-significant differences in the rho- l△807 oviposition numbers for the black-white, black-blue, black-green, and black-yellow choices compared with the controls (Fig 2F, t = 0.85, df = 11; t = 0.38, df = 13; t = -1.85, df = 12; t = 0.86, df = 11; P >0.05), the oviposition index of the black-red choice was significantly-different from that of the wild type (Fig 2F, t = -2.61, df = 12, P <0.01). These data support the conclusion that wild-type rho-l gene products have a significant role in the recognition of red containers, and deletion of the gene will significantly affect the oviposition site choice between red containers and the surrounding environment, thus affecting the identification and localization of oviposition sites.

We used red, green, and blue LEDs to study the role of light spectra in oviposition site choice and the phenotypic differences in the rho-l△807 strain. The mean numbers of gravid mosquitoes trapped with blue light were 7.33±1.08 for the control wild-type and 9.5±1.06 for the mutant strains and these were not statistically significant (Fig 2G; t = -1.43, df = 10, P = 0.183). Similarly, no significant differences were found under green light conditions with the mean numbers of 6.14±0.82 and 8.33±0.61 for control and mutant mosquitoes, respectively (Fig 2G; t = -2.06, df = 10, P = 0.064). In contrast, the mean numbers of mosquitoes trapped were significantly different in the red-light environment with 9.67±0.49 and 4.50±0.43 for control and mutant mosquitoes, respectively (Fig 2G; t = 7.9, df = 10, P <0.001).

The kh gene products have a critical role in oviposition site searching by regulating the quantity and quality of light

The pigment in the cells regulates the amount of light entering and forms different color patterns. Three primary colors usually make up a variety of patterns. The kh gene plays a crucial role in pigment synthesis by catalyzing a late stage in production of ommochromes [41]. The comparative analysis of the transcriptomes of the blindfolded and control groups revealed a lower level of accumulation of kh transcription products in the experimental group and this was confirmed further by RT-qPCR results (Fig 1E). This supports the hypothesis that kh gene products might be involved in the light-pathway reaction mediated by the compound eye.

A kh gene knockout strain was obtained from previous work (Fig 3A) [44], and like many in the broader family of mosquitoes, homozygous khw have a white-eye phenotype (Fig 3B).

Fig 3. Functional analysis of a khw mutant mosquitoes.

Fig 3

(a) Schematic diagram of the mutant, khw, gene knockout structure [44]. (b) Phenotype comparison of khw knockout lines and wild-type compound eyes. The scale size is 0.1mm. (c) Comparison of khw strains and wild-type search index (***P < 0.001, n = 6). (d) Comparisons of the numbers of khw and wild-type controls recorded under the brightness conditions of 0 lux, 130 lux, 1600 lux (**P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001, n = 9). (e) Comparisons of bidirectional egg-trapping indices of gravid wild-type and khw mutants in black-white, black-green, black-yellow, black-blue, and black-red oviposition cups. Oviposition activity index = (Number of eggs in non-black control cups–Number of eggs in black cups) / Total number of eggs laid in the experiment. (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and NS. P>0.05, n = 6–8). (f) Comparison of the numbers of wild-type control and khw mosquitoes attracted by red (center wavelength 630nm), blue (center wavelength 460nm), and green (center wavelength 520nm) lights (***P < 0. 001.n = 6–7). Data in (c), (d), (e) and (f) are represented as means ± SEM, and Student’s t test was used (NS. P>0.05, *P < 0.05, **P<0.01, and ***P<0.001).

Behavioral experiments showed that the search index of the khw strain was 0.13±0.02, significantly lower than that of wild mosquitoes (Fig 3C; 0.70±0.02, t = 16.37, df = 10, P <0.001), indicating that the kh gene knockout affected oviposition site searching behavior. The mean trapping numbers of the khw strain under 0, 130, and 1600 lux were 1±0.86, 1.22±0.97 and 0.88±0.78, respectively, with controls having the previously reported respective values of 5.10±0.92, 23.00±0.71 and 16.73±1.54 (Fig 3D), with the latter two values being statistically significance (Fig 3D, t = 4.23, df = 10.73, P<0.001; t = 28.0, df = 16, P<0.001; t = 9.66, df = 10.52, P<0.001). Consequently, the results could be similar to those seen in the rho-l mutant strain. These results support the interpretation that the deletion of the kh gene and loss of its products affected the search and location of oviposition sites. The results of testing the khw strain in the bidirectional selection of different color oviposition cups showed that the oviposition indices of the black-white and black-green groups were 0.18±0.13 and -0.35±0.16, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant compared with control wild-type mosquitoes (Fig 3E, t = -4.08, df = 11, P<0.01; t = -2.20, df = 12, P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the khw strain and controls with the black-blue, black-yellow and black-red groups (Fig 3E, t = -2.13, df = 12; t = -1.56, df = 8.71; t = -1.99, df = 12; P>0.05)

The mean values of khw strains flying into the three-hole Mosq-ovitrap under blue, green, and red lights were 0.33±0.21, 0.67±0.42 and 0.33±0.21, respectively, significantly differing from those of the control wild type (Fig 3F, t = 6.33, df = 5.38, P<0.001; t = 5.89, df = 11, P<0.001; t = 17.36, df = 6.76, P<0.001). The decreased number of mosquito traps khw to tricolor light suggested that kh was involved in the recognition of red, blue, and green monochromatic light or was related to the pattern formation of these three kinds of light.

Discussion

This study reveals a pivotal role of compound eye-mediated vision in the search for oviposition sites using blindfolded and control mosquitoes. Additionally, the screening of differential genes related to vision and their functional analysis demonstrated that the rho-l and kh genes are crucial visual genes in the oviposition site searches of Ae. albopictus. These findings establish a foundation for the scientific control of Ae. albopictus breeding sites.

The ommatidium is the unit that makes up the compound eye and contains eight light-sensitive cells called retinular cells. The spectral sensitivity of these cells depends primarily on the opsin in each photoreceptor cell [53,54]. Opsins are generally divided into long wavelength-sensitive opsins, medium wavelength-sensitive opsins, and short wavelength-sensitive opsins [55].

This study shows that the expression of the long-wavelength opsin rho-l differs between the compound eye blindfolded group and the control group. The mosquito’s perception of red light was reduced significantly after the ablation of rho-l, demonstrating that mosquitoes perceive long-wavelength light in dim light through the rho-l opsin, guiding them to search and locate suitable sites for oviposition. Results supports the interpretation that the rho-l gene is involved in the recognition of red light, which is consistent with the previous results of the two-color selection of the black-red containers, and that red light (most likely reflected in natural conditions) is important for oviposition site detection and selection [56]. Given the diversity of the opsin family, the co-expression of multiple opsins in the same photoreceptor cell enhances the sensitivity of photoreceptor cells to the light spectrum [57,58]. Hence, other long-wavelength opsins also may play a role in Ae. albopictus’ search for egg-laying sites. At the same time, more than one opsin-related gene was screened in our transcriptome data, which can be further functionally analyzed.

Furthermore, pigment derived from tryptophan metabolism can regulate the luminous flux of compound eyes, form different color patterns, and absorb free radicals, thereby participating in cell homeostasis.The mosquito KMO gene was first identified in 1997 [59], and its metabolic pathway was determined by expression profiling and chemical reactions and suggested to be associated with ocular pigmentation in adult mosquitoes [60]. The kh gene encodes kynurenine hydroxylase, which hydrolyzes kynurenine to 3-HK (3-hydroxy-kynurenine), which is transferred to the compound eye to participate in the synthesis of pigment cells and protects the integrity of the retina by reducing the intensity of light reaching the photoreceptor and removing oxidants [41]. If the pigment cells are damaged, the retinular cells cannot discern the intensity of light and this may result in damage to them [61]. Our experimental findings support the interpretation that the kh mutant strain exhibited a significantly diminished regulation of light intensity and was unable to perceive blue, green, and red light simultaneously.

The difference in oviposition activity index between the black-white and black-green groups supports the hypothesis that the pigment synthesized by kh gene might be involved in the recognition and permeability of green and white colors, and a kh knockout significantly enhanced the contrast between the white and green containers and the surrounding background, thus improving the recognition and selection of white and green oviposition containers. This study provides the initial evidence that the Ae. albopictus kh gene impacts adult female oviposition site selection. Furthermore, this functional defect may influence other physiological behaviors regulated by light pathways, such as host localization, mating, oviposition, and circadian rhythm. Considering that the kh gene serves as a common genetic marker for gene editing in insects [44,62,63], the fitness cost associated with khw mutant strains, including visual impairment, warrants attention.

Blindfolding affected the ability of mosquitoes to identify preferred oviposition containers, but did not block completely their ability to do so. It is clear from a number of studies that olfactory cues also play a significant role in this behavior [8,11,12]. The results presented here show that although the rho-l and kh strains were significantly impaired in this behavior compared to wild-type controls in low-light conditions (0 lux), some mosquitoes had other senses, most likely, olfaction, guiding their behavior. Furthermore, the mutation of kh and rho-l genes also may lead to a decrease in locomotor activity, and this may account for the reduced numbers of mosquitoes trapped in the dark when compared to wild-type controls. The reduced searching ability of the khw in dark environments may be due, in part, to its impact on mobility. Previous literature has reported that kh mutations in insects lead to motor dysfunction [64,65], which encompasses a range of behaviors, including flight. This is one possible explanation, another potential reason is that the kh gene may be involved in light recognition, requiring more time to adapt to changes in darkness-light transitions.

The observation that adult female Ae. albopictus prefer to find oviposition sites at dusk may indicate that twilight has specific attractive characteristics [46]. For example, this is a time when yellow light wavelengths are selectively absorbed by atmospheric ozone and the blue and red wavelengths will increase relative to each other, known as the "Chappuis effect" [66]. Additionally, longer red and orange light wavelengths are not easily scattered by the atmosphere, while shorter blue and violet light wavelengths are. As the sun approaches the horizon, atmospheric scattering by water vapor and dust becomes more pronounced, resulting in more scattering of blue and violet light and retention of red light. Consequently, the twilight spectrum is dominated by long wavelength red light, accompanied by low light intensity [67,68]. This study provided evidence that the rho-l gene product in the Ae. albopictus photoreceptor cells was sensitive to long wavelength red light, and the kh in the pigment cells was more adaptive to regulating the low light intensity at dusk and easily discerning the patterns formed by red light. This visual ability assists accurate identification of suitable oviposition sites at twilight.

The primary reason that Ae. albopictus females prefer to deposit their eggs in small black containers of stagnant water is that the black objects essentially do not reflect the spectrum, leading to decreased surface brightness, thus forming a strong contrast with the surrounding environment that attracts the mosquitoes [69,70]. The kh gene products result in the production of pigments that mainly mediate brightness perception. Mosquitoes with a mutant kh gene have a decreased ability to perceive brightness, resulting in increased visual contrast between white and green containers and their surroundings, thereby enhancing their recognition of these colored oviposition sites. However, kh knockout mutants may not perceive significant differences in brightness for containers of other colors. Therefore, decreasing the amount of light that reaches the surface of the oviposition containers and increasing the visual contrast between the oviposition container and its surroundings may be an effective method for enhancing the induction of mosquito egg laying.

Large water bodies absorb more long wavelengths of light and reflect short wavelengths such as blue and green, while small water bodies reflect more long wavelength red light [71]. As a result, the red light emitted from small water bodies is more readily detected by the rho-l gene product in the photoreceptor cells and the kh downstream metabolites in pigment cells. This visual distinction may form the basis for the female’s preference for depositing her eggs in small pools of water.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates a role for vision in the oviposition site selection behaviour of adult female Ae. albopictus. It also provides evidence of a mechanistic role of the wild-type rho-l and kh gene products in this behavior with mutants exhibiting differential sensitivity or recognition of light intensity and substrate colors. This work may provide the basis for novel management practices for controlling Ae. albopictus abundance by manipulating oviposition sites.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Comparison of the shadow index of blindfolded compound eyes with wild-type gravid mosquitoes.

Comparison of the shadow index of applied compound eyes with wild-type gravid mosquitoes. CE-blindfolded is the use of acrylic paint to apply mosquito compound eyes. shadow index = (number of mosquitoes in black environment—number of mosquitoes in light environment)/total. (t-test, t = 5.039, ***P<0.001, n = 9, Error bar represent mean ± SEM).

(TIF)

pntd.0012674.s001.tif (63.8KB, tif)
S2 Fig. Activity monitoring of wild-type and rho-l mutant strains of Aedes albopictus.

(a) Line graphs of mean activity of Aedes albopictus wild-type strain and rho-1Δ807 strain under LD light conditions for 4 consecutive days (days 4 to 7), white bars represent daytime and black bars represent nighttime; (b) Comparison of daytime and nighttime activity of Aedes albopictus wild-type strain and rho-1Δ807 strain under LD light conditions, Aedes albopictus wild-type, n = 29. rho-1Δ 807 strain, n = 28. (t-test, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, Error bar represent mean ± SEM).

(TIF)

pntd.0012674.s002.tif (110.6KB, tif)
S3 Fig. Experimental Design Flowchart.

(TIF)

pntd.0012674.s003.tif (89KB, tif)
S1 Table. Amino acid sequences and base sequences of wild-type mosquitoes and mutant strains.

(DOCX)

pntd.0012674.s004.docx (16.2KB, docx)
S2 Table. List and sequence of oligonucleotide primers used in this study.

(DOCX)

pntd.0012674.s005.docx (16.3KB, docx)
S3 Table. Statistics of mutation rates of G0 adults in Ae. albopictus.

(DOCX)

pntd.0012674.s006.docx (15KB, docx)
S4 Table. Reads of all detected genes in transcriptome sequencing.

(XLS)

pntd.0012674.s007.xls (1.6MB, xls)
S5 Table. The statistical data of the partial graph.

(XLSX)

pntd.0012674.s008.xlsx (24.3KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention for providing the Ae. albopictus Foshan strain and other colleagues from Southern Medical University for their advice and assistance in this study.

Data Availability

All data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2022B1111030002) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (31830087, 82261128003/2022YFML1001), and the National Institutes of Health, USA (AI136850) to X-G.C. AAJ is a Donald Bren Professor at UCI.The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Liu T, Xu Y, Wang XM, Gu JB, Yan GY, Chen XG. Antiviral systems in vector mosquitoes. Developmental and comparative immunology. 2018;83:34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2017.12.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mondet B, da Rosa AP, Vasconcelos PF. [The risk of urban yellow fever outbreaks in Brazil by dengue vectors. Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus]. Bulletin de la Societe de pathologie exotique (1990). 1996;89(2):107–13; discussion 14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kauffman EB, Kramer LD. Zika Virus Mosquito Vectors: Competence, Biology, and Vector Control. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2017;216(suppl_10):S976-s90. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Agyapong J, Chabi J, Ablorde A, Kartey WD, Osei JH, de Souza DK, et al. Ovipositional Behavior of Anopheles gambiae Mosquitoes. Trop Med Health. 2014;42(4):187–90. doi: 10.2149/tmh.2014-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Parker AT, McGill K, Allan BF. Container Type Affects Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) Oviposition Choice. Journal of medical entomology. 2020;57(5):1459–67. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjaa045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Allgood DW, Yee DA. Oviposition preference and offspring performance in container breeding mosquitoes: evaluating the effects of organic compounds and laboratory colonisation. Ecological entomology. 2017;42(4):506–16. doi: 10.1111/een.12412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yee DA, Skiff JF. Interspecific competition of a new invasive mosquito, Culex coronator, and two container mosquitoes, Aedes albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae), across different detritus environments. Journal of medical entomology. 2014;51(1):89–96. doi: 10.1603/me13182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bentley MD, Day JF. Chemical ecology and behavioral aspects of mosquito oviposition. Annual review of entomology. 1989;34:401–21. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.34.010189.002153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Davis EE. Olfactory control of mosquito behaviour. Ciba Foundation symposium. 1996;200:48–53. doi: 10.1002/9780470514948.ch5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mwingira V, Mboera LEG, Dicke M, Takken W. Exploiting the chemical ecology of mosquito oviposition behavior in mosquito surveillance and control: a review. Journal of vector ecology: journal of the Society for Vector Ecology. 2020;45(2):155–79. doi: 10.1111/jvec.12387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mosquera KD, Khan Z, Wondwosen B, Alsanius B, Hill SR, Ignell R, et al. Odor-mediated response of gravid Aedes aegypti to mosquito-associated symbiotic bacteria. Acta tropica. 2023;237:106730. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Girard M, Martin E, Vallon L, Raquin V, Bellet C, Rozier Y, et al. Microorganisms Associated with Mosquito Oviposition Sites: Implications for Habitat Selection and Insect Life Histories. Microorganisms. 2021;9(8). doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9081589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhao S, Liu H, Wu Y, Wu P, Fu J, Yang H, et al. The odorant-binding protein genes obp67 and obp56d-like encode products that guide oviposition site selection in the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus. Insect Sci. 2024. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.13430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jung SH, Kim D, Jung KS, Lee DK. Color Preference for Host-Seeking Activity of Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of medical entomology. 2021;58(6):2446–52. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjab100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bernath B, Horvath G, Gal J, Fekete G, Meyer-Rochow VB. Polarized light and oviposition site selection in the yellow fever mosquito: No evidence for positive polarotaxis in Aedes aegypti. Vision Res. 2008;48(13):1449–55. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ortiz-Perea N, Gander R, Abbey O, Callaghan A. The effect of pond dyes on oviposition and survival in wild UK Culex mosquitoes. PloS one. 2018;13(3):e0193847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Reiskind MH, Zarrabi AA. Water surface area and depth determine oviposition choice in Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of medical entomology. 2012;49(1):71–6. doi: 10.1603/me10270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Harrington LC, Ponlawat A, Edman JD, Scott TW, Vermeylen F. Influence of container size, location, and time of day on oviposition patterns of the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti, in Thailand. Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, NY). 2008;8(3):415–23. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2007.0203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bernáth B, Horváth G, Meyer-Rochow VB. Polarotaxis in egg-laying yellow fever mosquitoes Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti is masked due to infochemicals. Journal of insect physiology. 2012;58(7):1000–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gunathilaka N, Ranathunge T, Udayanga L, Wijegunawardena A, Abeyewickreme W. Oviposition preferences of dengue vectors; Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Sri Lanka under laboratory settings. Bull Entomol Res. 2018;108(4):442–50. doi: 10.1017/S0007485317000955 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhan Y, Alonso San Alberto D, Rusch C, Riffell JA, Montell C. Elimination of vision-guided target attraction in Aedes aegypti using CRISPR. Curr Biol. 2021;31(18):4180–7.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Borst A. Drosophila’s view on insect vision. Curr Biol. 2009;19(1):R36–47. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Paulk A, Millard SS, van Swinderen B. Vision in Drosophila: seeing the world through a model’s eyes. Annual review of entomology. 2013;58:313–32. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brammer JD, Clarin B. Changes in volume of the rhabdom in the compound eye of Aedes aegypti L. The Journal of experimental zoology. 1976;195(1):33–9. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401950104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Giraldo-Calderón GI, Zanis MJ, Hill CA. Retention of duplicated long-wavelength opsins in mosquito lineages by positive selection and differential expression. BMC evolutionary biology. 2017;17(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12862-017-0910-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hu X, Leming MT, Metoxen AJ, Whaley MA, O’Tousa JE. Light-mediated control of rhodopsin movement in mosquito photoreceptors. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2012;32(40):13661–7. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.1816-12.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liu X, Yang S, Yao Y, Wu S, Wu P, Zhai Z. Opsin1 regulates light-evoked avoidance behavior in Aedes albopictus. BMC Biol. 2022;20(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01308-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sharkey CR, Blanco J, Leibowitz MM, Pinto-Benito D, Wardill TJ. The spectral sensitivity of Drosophila photoreceptors. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):18242. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74742-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Muir LE, Thorne MJ, Kay BH. Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) vision: spectral sensitivity and other perceptual parameters of the female eye. J Med Entomol. 1992;29(2):278–81. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/29.2.278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shichida Y, Matsuyama T. Evolution of opsins and phototransduction. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological sciences. 2009;364(1531):2881–95. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hoel DF, Obenauer PJ, Clark M, Smith R, Hughes TH, Larson RT, et al. Efficacy of ovitrap colors and patterns for attracting Aedes albopictus at suburban field sites in north-central Florida. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 2011;27(3):245–51. doi: 10.2987/11-6121.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tsunoda T, Nguyen DT, Quynh TV. Effects of Color and Perforated Lid on Ovitrap Preference of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 2020;36(4):240–4. doi: 10.2987/20-6948.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Velez MM, Wernet MF, Clark DA, Clandinin TR. Walking Drosophila align with the e-vector of linearly polarized light through directed modulation of angular acceleration. Journal of comparative physiology A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology. 2014;200(6):603–14. doi: 10.1007/s00359-014-0910-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Saint-Charles A, Michard-Vanhée C, Alejevski F, Chélot E, Boivin A, Rouyer F. Four of the six Drosophila rhodopsin-expressing photoreceptors can mediate circadian entrainment in low light. The Journal of comparative neurology. 2016;524(14):2828–44. doi: 10.1002/cne.23994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tomioka K. The Compound Eye Regulates Free-Running Period and Stability of the Circadian Locomotor Rhythm in the Cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Zoological science. 2023;40(4):300–7. doi: 10.2108/zs230005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lin L, Lu W, Cai S, Duan J, Yi J, Deng F, et al. The design and efficacy observation of new mosq—ovitrap for monitoring of vector of dengue fever. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control. 2005;16(1):26–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hardie RC, Juusola M. Phototransduction in Drosophila. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015;34:37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Montell C. Drosophila visual transduction. Trends in neurosciences. 2012;35(6):356–63. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2012.03.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zwilling D, Huang SY, Sathyasaikumar KV, Notarangelo FM, Guidetti P, Wu HQ, et al. Kynurenine 3-monooxygenase inhibition in blood ameliorates neurodegeneration. Cell. 2011;145(6):863–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.05.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Han Q, Calvo E, Marinotti O, Fang J, Rizzi M, James AA, et al. Analysis of the wild-type and mutant genes encoding the enzyme kynurenine monooxygenase of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Insect molecular biology. 2003;12(5):483–90. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2003.00433.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Figon F, Casas J. Ommochromes in invertebrates: biochemistry and cell biology. Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 2019;94(1):156–83. doi: 10.1111/brv.12441 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Stavenga DG. Colour in the eyes of insects. Journal of comparative physiology A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology. 2002;188(5):337–48. doi: 10.1007/s00359-002-0307-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Liu P, Jin B, Li X, Zhao Y, Gu J, Biedler JK, et al. Nix is a male-determining factor in the Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus. Insect biochemistry and molecular biology. 2020;118:103311. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2019.103311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liu T, Yang WQ, Xie YG, Liu PW, Xie LH, Lin F, et al. Construction of an efficient genomic editing system with CRISPR/Cas9 in the vector mosquito Aedes albopictus. Insect Sci. 2019;26(6):1045–54. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Guo Y, Zhou J, Zhao Y, Deng J, Su X, Tang J, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated F1534S substitution in the voltage-gated sodium channel reveals its necessity and sufficiency for deltamethrin resistance in Aedes albopictus. Journal of Pest Science. 2022;96:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10340-022-01557-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Spitschan M, Lucas RJ, Brown TM. Chromatic clocks: Color opponency in non-image-forming visual function. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. 2017;78:24–33. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wilson R, Cooper CEC, Meah RJ, Wakefield A, Roberts NW, Jones G. The spectral composition of a white light influences its attractiveness to Culex pipiens mosquitoes. Ecology and evolution. 2023;13(1):e9714. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Araripe LO, Bezerra JRA, Rivas G, Bruno RV. Locomotor activity in males of Aedes aegypti can shift in response to females’ presence. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2635-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Duffield GE, Acri DJ, George GF, Sheppard AD, Beebe NW, Ritchie SA, et al. Diel flight activity of wild-caught Anopheles farauti (s.s.) and An. hinesorum malaria mosquitoes from northern Queensland, Australia. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3271-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rund SS, Lee SJ, Bush BR, Duffield GE. Strain- and sex-specific differences in daily flight activity and the circadian clock of Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. J Insect Physiol. 2012;58(12):1609–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ajayi OM, Marlman JM, Gleitz LA, Smith ES, Piller BD, Krupa JA, et al. Behavioral and postural analyses establish sleep-like states for mosquitoes that can impact host landing and blood feeding. The Journal of experimental biology. 2022;225(11). doi: 10.1242/jeb.244032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.McCulloch KJ, Macias-Muñoz A, Briscoe AD. Insect opsins and evo-devo: what have we learned in 25 years? Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological sciences. 2022;377(1862):20210288. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Peach DAH, Blake AJ. Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) Vision and Associated Electrophysiological Techniques. Cold Spring Harbor protocols. 2023;2023(10):pdb.top107671. doi: 10.1101/pdb.top107671 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hu X, England JH, Lani AC, Tung JJ, Ward NJ, Adams SM, et al. Patterned rhodopsin expression in R7 photoreceptors of mosquito retina: Implications for species-specific behavior. The Journal of comparative neurology. 2009;516(4):334–42. doi: 10.1002/cne.22114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Guignard Q, Allison JD, Slippers B. The evolution of insect visual opsin genes with specific consideration of the influence of ocelli and life history traits. BMC ecology and evolution. 2022;22(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12862-022-01960-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Alonso San Alberto D, Rusch C, Zhan Y, Straw AD, Montell C, Riffell JA. The olfactory gating of visual preferences to human skin and visible spectra in mosquitoes. Nature communications. 2022;13(1):555. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28195-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dalton BE, Loew ER, Cronin TW, Carleton KL. Spectral tuning by opsin coexpression in retinal regions that view different parts of the visual field. Proceedings Biological sciences. 2014;281(1797). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.McCulloch KJ, Macias-Muñoz A, Mortazavi A, Briscoe AD. Multiple Mechanisms of Photoreceptor Spectral Tuning in Heliconius Butterflies. Mol Biol Evol. 2022;39(4). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msac067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Li J, Li G. Transamination of 3-hydroxykynurenine to produce xanthurenic acid: a major branch pathway of tryptophan metabolism in the mosquito, Aedes aegypti, during larval development. Insect biochemistry and molecular biology. 1997;27(10):859–67. doi: 10.1016/s0965-1748(97)00068-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Li J, Beerntsen BT, James AA. Oxidation of 3-hydroxykynurenine to produce xanthommatin for eye pigmentation: a major branch pathway of tryptophan catabolism during pupal development in the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Insect biochemistry and molecular biology. 1999;29(4):329–38. doi: 10.1016/s0965-1748(99)00007-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhao Y, Shen Y. Light-Induced Retinal Ganglion Cell Damage and the Relevant Mechanisms. Cellular and molecular neurobiology. 2020;40(8):1243–52. doi: 10.1007/s10571-020-00819-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Aryan A, Anderson MA, Myles KM, Adelman ZN. TALEN-based gene disruption in the dengue vector Aedes aegypti. PloS one. 2013;8(3):e60082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Quan GX, Kim I, Kômoto N, Sezutsu H, Ote M, Shimada T, et al. Characterization of the kynurenine 3-monooxygenase gene corresponding to the white egg 1 mutant in the silkworm Bombyx mori. Molecular genetics and genomics: MGG. 2002;267(1):1–9. doi: 10.1007/s00438-001-0629-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Cerstiaens A, Huybrechts J, Kotanen S, Lebeau I, Meylaers K, De Loof A, et al. Neurotoxic and neurobehavioral effects of kynurenines in adult insects. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2003;312(4):1171–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.11.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Popov AV, Peresleni AI, Savvateeva-Popova EV, Riederer P. [Effect of mutation-induced excess brain concentration of intermediates of the kynurenine pathway of tryptophan metabolism on stress resistance and courtship behavior and communicative sound production in male Drosophila melanogaster]. Genetika. 2008;44(9):1216–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cohen JH, Last KS, Charpentier CL, Cottier F, Daase M, Hobbs L, et al. Photophysiological cycles in Arctic krill are entrained by weak midday twilight during the Polar Night. PLoS biology. 2021;19(10):e3001413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lee RL, Mollner DC. Tropospheric haze and colors of the clear twilight sky. Applied optics. 2017;56(19):G179–g87. doi: 10.1364/AO.56.00G179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bohren CF. Understanding colors in nature. Pigment cell research. 1988;1(4):214–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0749.1988.tb00419.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.van Breugel F, Riffell J, Fairhall A, Dickinson MH. Mosquitoes Use Vision to Associate Odor Plumes with Thermal Targets. Curr Biol. 2015;25(16):2123–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Liu MZ, Vosshall LB. General Visual and Contingent Thermal Cues Interact to Elicit Attraction in Female Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes. Curr Biol. 2019;29(13):2250–7.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Stomp M, Huisman J, Stal LJ, Matthijs HC. Colorful niches of phototrophic microorganisms shaped by vibrations of the water molecule. The ISME journal. 2007;1(4):271–82. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2007.59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012674.r001

Decision Letter 0

Amy C Morrison, Joshua B Benoit

17 Sep 2024

Dear Professor Chen,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Vision guides the twilight search for oviposition sites of the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

The reviewers indicated that your paper was interesting, but had some suggestions for improvement. After these are addressed, two or the reviewers requested to review that paper once more.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Joshua B. Benoit

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Amy Morrison

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

The reviewers indicated that your paper was interesting, but had some suggestions for improvement. After these are addressed, two or the reviewers requested to review that paper once more.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: The objectives of the study clearly articulated, and the study design was appropriate.

Reviewer #2: No problems for the methods section.

Reviewer #3: The only methodological modification I am suggesting is the inclusion of other controls for the RNA-seq experiments i.e. blindfolded compounded eyes not flying into the three-hole Mosq-ovitrap and unblindfolded compound eyes not flying into the three-hole Mosq-ovitrap.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: Statistical analysis was clear, and results were completely presented.

Reviewer #2: Confident results are presented.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: The conclusion supported by the results presented. the discussion was helpful.

Reviewer #2: A clear conclusion is drawn.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Minor revision.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: The authors attempted to prove that mosquito’s vision is important in their search for oviposition habitats, and they used novel methods proved that some visual-related genes control the mosquito oviposition habitat search behavior. The experimental designs are appropriate, and the results are very interesting.

Major comment

The major issue is the mix-up of results with methods and discussions. The authors described in several places the “purposes and methods” in the “result” section; whereas, in the “methods” section, the authors did not describe the purpose of each experiment. Similarly, after describing the results, the authors discussed them in the “results” section, which should be discussed in the “discussion” section.

Specific comments

1. Transcriptome sequencing, the purpose of this is not clear, to identify differentially expressed visual–related genes or to examine odor-related genes? The purpose of this experiment will determine the control and test groups. The purpose of this experiment needs to be clarified.

2. Transcriptome sequencing: “Mosquitoes with blindfolded compound eyes flying into the three-hole Mosq-ovitrap will be the test group, while those with unblindfolded eyes flying into the three-hole Mosq-ovitrap device will be the control group”, is this correct? Or should it be “Mosquitoes with blindfolded compound eyes (no visual cue) did not fly into the traps will be the test group, while those with unblindfolded eyes (has visual cue) flying into the traps will be the control group” if testing for visual-related genes?

3. Similarly, the authors should describe the purpose of “CRISPR/Cas9 editing experiments of rho-l and kh genes” and for “Color bidirectional selection experiments”, so that readers have a better understanding of the context and to determine if the methods used are appropriate. In fact, the best way to do is to draw a flowchart to describe the flows of experimental design and the purpose of each experiments, although most studies lack this.

4. Line 254: “The oviposition activity index is the number of eggs of other-colored oviposition mosquitoes - number of black oviposition mosquitoes)/ (number of eggs of other colored oviposition mosquitoes + number of black oviposition mosquitoes)”, why not simply use number of eggs of other-colored oviposition mosquitoes vs. number of black oviposition mosquitoes?

5. Line 301: “Statistical analysis”, “T-test” should be “t-test”, because usually “T-test” is used for “Holling T-test”

6. Lines 311-317: This section should move to “Method” section, this describes the purpose of the method used especially the authors include the references here. In the “Result” section, only describe the results. Lines 331-332 may also be moved to “Method” section.

7. In line 327, please use (b) and (d) instead of “b and d”.

8. Lines 333-334: A statistical test result should be added here to describe the significance.

9. Lines 337-345: Similarly, this part should be described in the “Method” section, i.e., the purpose of each method.

10. Line 348: need a degree of freedom for the t-test. This occurred in many places in the results, please check all t-test results in the text, please use “t=???, d.f. = ?, P-value”, all tests need a degree of freedom.

11. Lines 357-359: Please move this sentence to “Method” section.

12. Line 362: Need test method, statistical value, degree of freedom.

13. Lines 367-373: Please move this section to “Methods” section.

14. Line 408: Fig 2, please use “(d), (e), (f), and (g)”.

15. Lines 411-425: Should this part be moved to method? It described the method rather than results.

16. Lines 435-443: Please move this part to “Methods” section.

17. Lines 469-476: Please move this part to " Methods” section.

18. Lines 494-500: Please move this part to " Methods” section.

19. Lines 509-518: This section should be described in the “Discussion” section.

20. Lines 512-526: This belongs to the “Method” section.

21. Lines 572-580: This section should be described in the “Discussion” section.

22. Lines 588-592: This is the conclusion of the study, should be described at the end of the paper.

Reviewer #2: The work is of high scientific value and rigor.

1. The authors say they used a brush to coat the mosquito's compound eyes with a black water-soluble pigment, but they don't say how much was used. This should be specified.

2. Line 103 needs more literature support.

3.Line 358, change “should result in” to “will result in”.

4. Line 525, change “forms different color patterns” to “and forms different color patterns”.

5. Line 657 needs more literature support.

Reviewer #3: The manuscript entitled; “Vision guides the twilight search for oviposition sites of the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus” provides a robust investigation into the understanding of the roles of visual cues in mosquito reproductive biology. The authors through a series of experiments ranging from behavioral, RNA-seq to gene-editing assays have been able to dive into some of the mechanistic factors influencing oviposition site selection in Aedes albopictus. The results here are important since the manipulation of oviposition sites can be leveraged for mosquito control. The paper is well written except for some minor editing and paragraphing issues which I will be highlighting subsequently. The results are well described and the appropriate tests were selected accordingly. The only big limitation in this work is the inability of the authors to conduct specific experiments where the influence of olfaction cues is disentangled from visual cues.

Introduction:

~ Lines 76-78: The sentence here seems incomplete if the public health importance of these diseases are not emphasized.

~ Lines 98-102: To improve readability, this sentence can be broken into two sentences.

Methods:

~ Generally, apart from the locomotor activity section, no information was given on the age of the mosquitoes when they were used for the experiments. The only thing close was the days after blood-feeding that the mosquitoes were selected. Age seems to play a very significant role on several aspects of mosquito biology, so it would be important if the age of the mosquitoes were mentioned.

~ For the RNA-seq experiments (lines 168-170), was there any reason these controls were not considered?: (a) blindfolded compound eyes not flying into the three-hole Mosq-ovitrap and (b) unblindfolded compound eyes not flying into the three-hole Mosq-ovitrap device.

~ Lines 254-258 - The equation is not easily comprehensible.

~ Lines 289-290 - The activity monitoring system has also been used in mosquitoes recently in the last five years: Ajayi et al 2022 (https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.244032).

~ To address the issue of olfaction obscuring the effect of visual cues, the authors can do well by running specific experiments with mosquitoes showing mutations in olfactory responses (orco mutants etc).

Results:

~ SWISS-MODEL was mentioned once and there is was prior description about it. It will be helpful if you can provide details about the model whether in the methods or results section.

Discussion:

~ Lines 638-640 seems to be too short to be a paragraph.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012674.r003

Decision Letter 1

Amy C Morrison, Joshua B Benoit

4 Nov 2024

Dear Professor Chen,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Vision guides the twilight search for oviposition sites of the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Joshua B. Benoit

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Amy Morrison

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

orcid.org/0000-0003-4304-636XX

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

orcid.org/0000-0003-1765-0002

***********************************************************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: The authors have sufficiently provided clarifications to all my concerns.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012674.r004

Acceptance letter

Amy C Morrison, Joshua B Benoit

11 Nov 2024

Dear Professor Chen,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Vision guides the twilight search for oviposition sites of the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Comparison of the shadow index of blindfolded compound eyes with wild-type gravid mosquitoes.

    Comparison of the shadow index of applied compound eyes with wild-type gravid mosquitoes. CE-blindfolded is the use of acrylic paint to apply mosquito compound eyes. shadow index = (number of mosquitoes in black environment—number of mosquitoes in light environment)/total. (t-test, t = 5.039, ***P<0.001, n = 9, Error bar represent mean ± SEM).

    (TIF)

    pntd.0012674.s001.tif (63.8KB, tif)
    S2 Fig. Activity monitoring of wild-type and rho-l mutant strains of Aedes albopictus.

    (a) Line graphs of mean activity of Aedes albopictus wild-type strain and rho-1Δ807 strain under LD light conditions for 4 consecutive days (days 4 to 7), white bars represent daytime and black bars represent nighttime; (b) Comparison of daytime and nighttime activity of Aedes albopictus wild-type strain and rho-1Δ807 strain under LD light conditions, Aedes albopictus wild-type, n = 29. rho-1Δ 807 strain, n = 28. (t-test, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, Error bar represent mean ± SEM).

    (TIF)

    pntd.0012674.s002.tif (110.6KB, tif)
    S3 Fig. Experimental Design Flowchart.

    (TIF)

    pntd.0012674.s003.tif (89KB, tif)
    S1 Table. Amino acid sequences and base sequences of wild-type mosquitoes and mutant strains.

    (DOCX)

    pntd.0012674.s004.docx (16.2KB, docx)
    S2 Table. List and sequence of oligonucleotide primers used in this study.

    (DOCX)

    pntd.0012674.s005.docx (16.3KB, docx)
    S3 Table. Statistics of mutation rates of G0 adults in Ae. albopictus.

    (DOCX)

    pntd.0012674.s006.docx (15KB, docx)
    S4 Table. Reads of all detected genes in transcriptome sequencing.

    (XLS)

    pntd.0012674.s007.xls (1.6MB, xls)
    S5 Table. The statistical data of the partial graph.

    (XLSX)

    pntd.0012674.s008.xlsx (24.3KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 20241004 edited_Responses to reviewers 2.1.docx

    pntd.0012674.s009.docx (35.9KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials.


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES