Skip to main content
Plant Biotechnology Journal logoLink to Plant Biotechnology Journal
. 2024 Aug 16;22(12):3342–3344. doi: 10.1111/pbi.14452

Ustilaginoidea virens secreted effector UvSec117 hijacks OsWRKY31‐OsAOC module to suppress jasmonic acid‐mediated immunity in rice

Yuhang Duan 1,2, , Guogen Yang 1, , Jintian Tang 3, , Yuan Fang 1, Hailin Wang 1, Zhaoyun Wang 1, Hao Liu 2, Xiaolin Chen 2, Junbin Huang 2, Jing Chen 1, Qiutao Xu 4,, Lu Zheng 2,, Xiaoyang Chen 1,
PMCID: PMC11606405  PMID: 39151038

Rice false smut (RFS) caused by Ustilaginoidea virens is one of the most important disease in rice (Oryza sativa)‐growing regions worldwide. RFS not only causes rice yield losses but also potentially threatens human and animal health by producing cyclopeptide mycotoxins (Sun et al., 2020). Introducing genetically encoded resistance is an environmentally friendly, economical approach to controlling plant diseases (Yu et al., 2023). However, at present, the varieties and gene resources of resistance to RFS are still extremely scarce, and it is difficult to identify major resistance genes against RFS. Uncovering the functions of the U. virens effectors and molecular mechanism of the rice, U. virens interaction can help to identify molecular probes for discovering disease resistance‐related genes (Wang and Kawano, 2022).

In previous studies, we identified UvSec117 as a key virulence effector in U. virens, and found rice transcription factor OsWRKY31 in a screen for proteins that interact with UvSec117 (Chen et al., 2022). WRKY transcription factors have many regulatory roles in development and response to biotic/abiotic stresses in plants (Wang et al., 2023). However, little is known about the regulatory functions of WRKY genes in the plant resistance to grain‐infecting pathogens. In this work, we confirmed interactions between UvSec117 and OsWRKY31 in a directed yeast two‐hybrid assay (Figure 1a; Data S1). In a co‐immunoprecipitation (Co‐IP) assay by rice protoplasts transiently co‐expressing OsWRKY31‐Flag and UvSec117‐GFP constructs, UvSec117 was immunoprecipitated by OsWRKY31 (Figure 1b). In a pull‐down assay using recombinant OsWRKY31‐GST and UvSec117‐His purified from Escherichia coli, OsWRKY31‐GST was pulled down by His beads coated with UvSec117‐His (Figure 1c). We also validated the interaction between UvSec117 and OsWRKY31 by a luciferase complementation imaging (LCI) assay in N. benthamiana leaves (Figure 1d). When we transiently co‐expressed UvSec117‐cYFP and OsWRKY31‐nYFP constructs in rice protoplasts and performed a bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assay, we detected YFP (yellow fluorescent protein) fluorescence in the nucleus (Figure 1e). Collectively, these results suggest that UvSec117 interacts with OsWRKY31 in vivo and in vitro.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

UvSec117 hijacks OsWRKY31‐OsAOC module to suppress jasmonic acid mediated immunity in rice. (a) Yeast two‐hybrid analysis of the interaction between UvSec117 and OsWRKY31. (b) Co‐IP showing that UvSec117 interacts with OsWRKY31 in vivo. (c) GST pull‐down assay to detect the interaction between UvSec117‐His and OsWRKY31‐GST. (d) LCI assay of the interaction between UvSec117‐nLUC and OsWRKY31‐cLUC in N. benthamiana epidermal cells. (e) BiFC assay of the interaction between UvSec117 and OsWRKY31; scale bar, 5 μm. (f) Resistance of NPB, OsWRKY31‐OE and wrky31 plants against U. virens HWD‐2 at 21 dpi. (g) Disease symptoms and lesion lengths of NPB, OsWRKY31‐OE, and wrky31 plants at 14 dpi with Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae strain PXO99 when inoculated via the scissor‐clipping method; scale bar, 1 cm. (h) Disease symptoms and leaf lesion areas of NPB, OsWRKY31‐OE and wrky31 plants at 14 dpi following spot inoculation with Magnaporthe oryzae strain ZB25; scale bar, 1 cm. (i) Disease symptoms and leaf lesions of NPB, OsWRKY31‐OE and wrky31 plants at 3 dpi with Rhizoctonia solani strain HG81; scale bar, 1 cm. (j) OsWRKY31‐binding sites were shown in the genome of rice. (k) Top three OsWRKY31 binding motifs identified using MEME. (l) Representative GO pathways of OsWRKY31‐target genes. (m) RT‐qPCR and ChIP‐qPCR of OsAOC expression in NPB and wrky31‐1 plants. (n) Resistance of NPB and OsAOC mutant plants against U. virens HWD‐2 at 21 dpi. (o) UvSec117 inhibits OsWRKY31‐activated OsAOCpro‐LUC transcription. OsAOCpro‐LUC was infiltrated alone, or together with OsWRKY31 and UvSec117. (p) Yeast one‐hybrid analysis indicated OsWRKY31 can bind to the promoter of OsAOC. (q) UvSec117 inhibits the DNA‐binding activity of OsWRKY31. OsWRKY31‐His was incubated with a biotin‐labelled probe within the OsAOC promoter and subjected to EMSA. Unlabelled probe was used as the competitor (100×). UvSec117‐His was preincubated with OsWRKY31‐GST for EMSA. (r) JA concentrations in NPB and wrky31‐1, EV and HE‐1 rice spikelets. Phytohormones were analysed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. (s) A working model illustrating how UvSec117 manipulates OsWRKY31 to suppress rice immunity during U. virens infection. Data are means ± SD (n = 3 unless otherwise indicated). The P‐values were determined by unpaired t‐tests and Tukey's multiple comparisons test.

To explore the role of OsWRKY31 in resistance against RFS fungus or other rice pathogens, we generated OsWRKY31 knockout mutant plants (wrky31) (Figure S1a) and OsWRKY31‐overexpressing transgenic rice lines (OsWRKY31‐OE) (Figure S1b). The agronomic traits of wrky31 and OsWRKY31‐OE plants were similar to those of wild‐type Nipponbare (NPB) (Figure S1c,d). Following inoculation with different rice pathogens, OsWRKY31‐OE plants were less susceptible and wrky31 plants were more susceptible to the RFS, bacterial blight, rice blast and sheath blight than NPB plants (Figure 1f–i), indicating that OsWRKY31 positively regulates the resistance of rice to multiple diseases.

To identify global targets of the transcription factor OsWRKY31, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by deep sequencing (ChIP‐seq) using OsWRKY31‐OE plants with an anti‐Flag antibody. In total, we identified 4626 peaks (1054 target genes, Data S2). A significant majority (> 60%) of these peaks are located within genic regions, with the modifications being highly enriched at the promoters of protein‐coding genes (Figure 1j). MEME (Multiple EM for Motif Elicitation) analysis revealed that most OsWRKY31‐bound DNA motifs contained the sequence TTGTACTT, GGGCCCAC or CCCCTTTT (Figure 1k). Gene ontology (GO) analysis revealed that the target genes were enriched for induced systemic resistance and salicylic acid (SA)/jasmonic acid (JA)‐mediated signalling pathways (Figure 1l). RT‐qPCR showed that the key JA biosynthesis gene OsAOC (ALLENE OXIDE CYCLASE) is significantly downregulated in wrky31‐1 plants, and ChIP‐qPCR confirmed that OsWRKY31 binds to the OsAOC promoter (Figure 1m). Knockout of OsAOC in rice enhances its susceptibility to RFS (Figure 1n). OsWRKY31 expression in N. benthamiana significantly enhanced firefly luciferase (LUC) activity derived from the OsAOCproLUC reporter. Co‐infiltration of UvSec117 with OsAOCproLUC inhibited OsWRKY31‐induced LUC activity, whereas co‐infiltration of GFP, did not (Figure 1o). Yeast one‐hybrid results showed that OsWRKY31 can bind the promoter of OsAOC (Figure 1p). In an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) assay, OsWRKY31‐His specifically bound to the OsAOC promoter; addition of unlabelled competitive probe decreased this binding. Preincubation with UvSec117 reduced the DNA‐binding activity of OsWRKY31 (Figure 1q), indicating that UvSec117 directly inhibits the DNA‐binding activity of OsWRKY31. Moreover, the contents of JA were significantly lower in wrky31‐1 than in NPB rice spikelets; in HE‐1 (Heterologous expression of UvSec117 transgenic plants) relative to EV (empty vector transgenic plants) rice spikelets (Figure 1r). These results indicate that OsWRKY31 regulating the JA‐mediated defence was suppressed by UvSec117.

In this study, we found that the transcription factor OsWRKY31 functions as a key positive regulator to broad‐spectrum disease resistance. Here, we provide a comprehensive genome‐wide binding map of OsWRKY31 and its regulatory network, and further describe a previously unknown regulatory role where OsWRKY31 mediates the JA‐mediated signalling pathway to regulate plant immunity. Collectively, this study unveils a pivotal virulence strategy employed by U. virens, the secretory effector UvSec117 inhibits OsWRKY31 binding to target gene promoters like OsAOC, thereby suppressing JA‐mediated defence (Figure 1s). Moreover, this investigation highlights the critical role of OsWRKY31 as a crucial component in orchestrating multi‐pathogen resistance, further underscoring its significance in plant defence mechanisms. The OsWRKY31‐OE lines generated in this study may provide valuable germplasm resources for rice disease resistance breeding, which has important theoretical and practical value.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author contributions

Y.D. J.T. and G.Y. performed most of the experiments. Q.X. performed the data analyses. L.Z., H.L., H.W., Z.W., Y.F., J.H., J.C. and X‐L.C. provided technical support. X‐Y.C. and L.Z. wrote and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Supporting information

Data S1 Materials and methods.

PBI-22-3342-s003.doc (97.7KB, doc)

Data S2 ChIP‐seq data statistics of the OsWRKY31.

PBI-22-3342-s001.xlsx (880.7KB, xlsx)

Figure S1 OsWRKY31 transgenic rice plants were achieved without adverse effects on plant growth or yield. (a) Mutations identified within sgRNA target sites of OsWRKY31 in rice generated by CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated genome editing. (b) RT‐qPCR of OsWRKY31 expression in NPB and OsWRKY31‐OE transgenic rice plants. (c, d) Morphology and agronomic traits of mature wild‐type NPB, OsWRKY31‐OE and wrky31 plants grown in the field. Data are means ± SD (n = 3 unless otherwise indicated). The P‐values were determined by Tukey's multiple comparison tests compared to NPB.

PBI-22-3342-s002.docx (116.7KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32100465, 32302302 and 32172372) and the ‘Pioneer’ and ‘Leading Goose’ R&D Program of Zhejiang (2023C02018).

Contributor Information

Qiutao Xu, Email: qtxu@gxu.edu.cn.

Lu Zheng, Email: luzheng@mail.hzau.edu.cn.

Xiaoyang Chen, Email: cxy084@ahau.edu.cn.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

References

  1. Chen, X.Y. , Duan, Y.H. , Qiao, F.G. , Liu, H. , Huang, J.B. , Luo, C.X. , Chen, X.L. et al. (2022) A secreted fungal effector suppresses rice immunity through host histone hypoacetylation. New Phytol. 235, 1977–1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sun, W.X. , Fan, J. , Fang, A.F. , Li, Y.J. , Tariqjaveed, M. , Li, D.Y. , Hu, D.W. et al. (2020) Ustilaginoidea virens: Insights into an emerging rice pathogen. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 58, 3.1–3.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang, Q. and Kawano, Y. (2022) Improving disease resistance to rice false smut without yield penalty by manipulating the expression of effector target. Mol. Plant 15, 1834–1837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang, S. , Han, S. , Zhou, X. , Zhao, C. , Guo, L. , Zhang, J. , Liu, F. et al. (2023) Phosphorylation and ubiquitination of OsWRKY31 are integral to OsMKK10‐2‐mediated defense responses in rice. Plant Cell 35, 2391–2412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Yu, S. , Liu, P. , Wang, J. , Li, D. , Zhao, D. , Yang, C. , Shi, D. et al. (2023) Molecular mechanisms of Ustilaginoidea virens pathogenicity and their utilization in disease control. Phytopathol. Res. 5, 16. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data S1 Materials and methods.

PBI-22-3342-s003.doc (97.7KB, doc)

Data S2 ChIP‐seq data statistics of the OsWRKY31.

PBI-22-3342-s001.xlsx (880.7KB, xlsx)

Figure S1 OsWRKY31 transgenic rice plants were achieved without adverse effects on plant growth or yield. (a) Mutations identified within sgRNA target sites of OsWRKY31 in rice generated by CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated genome editing. (b) RT‐qPCR of OsWRKY31 expression in NPB and OsWRKY31‐OE transgenic rice plants. (c, d) Morphology and agronomic traits of mature wild‐type NPB, OsWRKY31‐OE and wrky31 plants grown in the field. Data are means ± SD (n = 3 unless otherwise indicated). The P‐values were determined by Tukey's multiple comparison tests compared to NPB.

PBI-22-3342-s002.docx (116.7KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.


Articles from Plant Biotechnology Journal are provided here courtesy of Society for Experimental Biology (SEB) and the Association of Applied Biologists (AAB) and John Wiley and Sons, Ltd

RESOURCES