Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1996 Jul 15;494(Pt 2):377–387. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021499

Slow gating charge immobilization in the human potassium channel Kv1.5 and its prevention by 4-aminopyridine.

D Fedida 1, R Bouchard 1, F S Chen 1
PMCID: PMC1160641  PMID: 8841998

Abstract

1. The relationship between ionic current inactivation and immobilization of 'off'-gating charge in human Kv1.5 channels expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells was studied using 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) and tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA-Cl). 2. The charge transferred during short (< 10 ms) depolarizations (Q(on)) was conserved on repolarization (Q(off)) although peak off-gating current (off-Ig) was reduced and the time course prolonged (tau decay increased from 0.4 to > 1.2 ms). For +80 mV pulses longer than 50 ms, Q(off) at 20 ms was less than Q(on) (Q(off)/Q(on) ratio was 0.26 +/- 0.06 at 450 ms). We attribute this to a relative 'immobilization' of gating charge during long depolarizations. 3. 4-AP (0.1-1 mM) prevented slowing of off-Ig, allowing saturation of peak off-Ig. 4-AP also completely prevented immobilization of off-Ig after long depolarizations. In 1 mM 4-AP, off-Ig waveforms decayed rapidly and the charge ratio Q(off)/Q(on) remained at 1.0. 4. In addition to its effects on Ig, 1 mM 4-AP prevented the slow inactivation of ionic current seen during strong depolarizations. An initial block was caused by 4-AP or 1 mM intracellular TEA internally applied. However, only 4-AP prevented the slower, later development of C-type inactivation. 5. We suggest that slow current inactivation is accompanied by a gating charge immobilization in Kv1.5. 4-AP potently inhibits the changes in Q(off)/Q(on0, off-Ig, and ionic currents that underlie slow inactivation. Some actions of 4-AP appear independent of its properties as a blocker of open K+ channels, and are not mimicked by internal TEA.

Full text

PDF
377

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armstrong C. M., Bezanilla F. Currents related to movement of the gating particles of the sodium channels. Nature. 1973 Apr 13;242(5398):459–461. doi: 10.1038/242459a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baukrowitz T., Yellen G. Modulation of K+ current by frequency and external [K+]: a tale of two inactivation mechanisms. Neuron. 1995 Oct;15(4):951–960. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90185-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bezanilla F., Perozo E., Papazian D. M., Stefani E. Molecular basis of gating charge immobilization in Shaker potassium channels. Science. 1991 Nov 1;254(5032):679–683. doi: 10.1126/science.1948047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bezanilla F., Perozo E., Stefani E. Gating of Shaker K+ channels: II. The components of gating currents and a model of channel activation. Biophys J. 1994 Apr;66(4):1011–1021. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80882-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bouchard R., Fedida D. Closed- and open-state binding of 4-aminopyridine to the cloned human potassium channel Kv1.5. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995 Nov;275(2):864–876. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Castle N. A., Fadous S. R., Logothetis D. E., Wang G. K. 4-Aminopyridine binding and slow inactivation are mutually exclusive in rat Kv1.1 and Shaker potassium channels. Mol Pharmacol. 1994 Dec;46(6):1175–1181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Choi K. L., Aldrich R. W., Yellen G. Tetraethylammonium blockade distinguishes two inactivation mechanisms in voltage-activated K+ channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jun 15;88(12):5092–5095. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.12.5092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Choquet D., Korn H. Mechanism of 4-aminopyridine action on voltage-gated potassium channels in lymphocytes. J Gen Physiol. 1992 Feb;99(2):217–240. doi: 10.1085/jgp.99.2.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fedida D., Wible B., Wang Z., Fermini B., Faust F., Nattel S., Brown A. M. Identity of a novel delayed rectifier current from human heart with a cloned K+ channel current. Circ Res. 1993 Jul;73(1):210–216. doi: 10.1161/01.res.73.1.210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grissmer S., Cahalan M. TEA prevents inactivation while blocking open K+ channels in human T lymphocytes. Biophys J. 1989 Jan;55(1):203–206. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82793-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hoshi T., Zagotta W. N., Aldrich R. W. Two types of inactivation in Shaker K+ channels: effects of alterations in the carboxy-terminal region. Neuron. 1991 Oct;7(4):547–556. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90367-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ikeda S. R., Korn S. J. Influence of permeating ions on potassium channel block by external tetraethylammonium. J Physiol. 1995 Jul 15;486(Pt 2):267–272. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kirsch G. E., Drewe J. A. Gating-dependent mechanism of 4-aminopyridine block in two related potassium channels. J Gen Physiol. 1993 Nov;102(5):797–816. doi: 10.1085/jgp.102.5.797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kirsch G. E., Shieh C. C., Drewe J. A., Vener D. F., Brown A. M. Segmental exchanges define 4-aminopyridine binding and the inner mouth of K+ pores. Neuron. 1993 Sep;11(3):503–512. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90154-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kukuljan M., Labarca P., Latorre R. Molecular determinants of ion conduction and inactivation in K+ channels. Am J Physiol. 1995 Mar;268(3 Pt 1):C535–C556. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1995.268.3.C535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. López-Barneo J., Hoshi T., Heinemann S. H., Aldrich R. W. Effects of external cations and mutations in the pore region on C-type inactivation of Shaker potassium channels. Receptors Channels. 1993;1(1):61–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McCormack K., Joiner W. J., Heinemann S. H. A characterization of the activating structural rearrangements in voltage-dependent Shaker K+ channels. Neuron. 1994 Feb;12(2):301–315. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90273-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ogielska E. M., Zagotta W. N., Hoshi T., Heinemann S. H., Haab J., Aldrich R. W. Cooperative subunit interactions in C-type inactivation of K channels. Biophys J. 1995 Dec;69(6):2449–2457. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80114-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Panyi G., Sheng Z., Deutsch C. C-type inactivation of a voltage-gated K+ channel occurs by a cooperative mechanism. Biophys J. 1995 Sep;69(3):896–903. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)79963-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Perozo E., Papazian D. M., Stefani E., Bezanilla F. Gating currents in Shaker K+ channels. Implications for activation and inactivation models. Biophys J. 1992 Apr;62(1):160–171. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81802-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shieh C. C., Kirsch G. E. Mutational analysis of ion conduction and drug binding sites in the inner mouth of voltage-gated K+ channels. Biophys J. 1994 Dec;67(6):2316–2325. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80718-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stühmer W., Conti F., Stocker M., Pongs O., Heinemann S. H. Gating currents of inactivating and non-inactivating potassium channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Pflugers Arch. 1991 May;418(4):423–429. doi: 10.1007/BF00550881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Taglialatela M., Stefani E. Gating currents of the cloned delayed-rectifier K+ channel DRK1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 May 15;90(10):4758–4762. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.10.4758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Yellen G., Sodickson D., Chen T. Y., Jurman M. E. An engineered cysteine in the external mouth of a K+ channel allows inactivation to be modulated by metal binding. Biophys J. 1994 Apr;66(4):1068–1075. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80888-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zagotta W. N., Aldrich R. W. Voltage-dependent gating of Shaker A-type potassium channels in Drosophila muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1990 Jan;95(1):29–60. doi: 10.1085/jgp.95.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES