Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2024 Oct 18;12:304. Originally published 2023 Mar 20. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.130364.2

Knowledge and Attitude of self-medication with leftover antibiotics in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study

Bader Al-Mehmadi 1,a, Saad Alsubaie 2, Omar Al-Morikhi 2, Fawaz Alqahtani 2, Waad Almutairi 2, Maryam Al-Mutairi 2, Mohammed Alotaibi 2, Saud Alenazi 2, Khalid Alanazi 2
PMCID: PMC11607477  PMID: 39618514

Version Changes

Revised. Amendments from Version 1

We have thoroughly improved the article. The content now has been reduced. Introduction is much smaller than the previous version. We also revised the discussion section of manuscript and compared our results with latest published articles.

Abstract

Background

Antimicrobial resistance is increasing at an alarming rate. The use of antibiotics without a prescription by a patient or other family members and their inappropriate storage have caused serious health issues as it would lead to antibiotic resistance and exposure to the risk of harmful adverse effects unnecessarily. Therefore, the study aimed to evaluate the current behaviour of antibiotic usage, storage, re-usage and misuse among the residents of Saudi Arabia.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study. Our target study population was the residents of Saudi Arabia. Data were collected by an online questionnaire and analysed by SPSS.

Results

A total of 738 participants answered the online questionnaire from all ages, genders, nationalities, and socioeconomic backgrounds residing in different regions across the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 76.42% knew that an antibiotic is a chemical substance used to treat infections. The participants were questioned about when they started using antibiotics, to which 95.66% (n=706) responded after consulting a physician, 3.25% (n=24) said when they felt ill for any reason, and 1.08% (n=8) replied after first attempting herbal medicine. A total of 147 participants admitted that they store excess pills of antibiotics after being prescribed for an infection and reuse them later on for symptoms like sore throat and fever.

Conclusions

The results indicated that nearly half of the participants used leftover antibiotics. Participants having children in their homes significantly reuse antibiotics. However, one-third of the participants didn’t complete the antibiotics course. A large portion of the population, regardless of age, level of education, or professional background, have continued to store leftover antibiotics after an infection treatment and reuse them once they think they need them for new symptoms. This advice further revises the current measures to fill those gaps and reduce this habit.

Keywords: Leftover antibiotics, self-medication, antimicrobial resistance

Introduction

Recently, an alarming issue in human health has come to light: the misuse of leftover antibiotics. Antibiotics are potent drugs used to treat bacterial infections, but improper administration or storage can cause bacteria to develop resistance. 1 The primary risk associated with the misuse of leftover antibiotics is the development of drug-resistant bacteria. If bacteria are repeatedly exposed to a particular antibiotic, they will develop resistance over time. In addition, if left untreated, this could lead to additional, more difficult diseases that may also be resistant to other drugs, ultimately leaving the infected significantly worse off than before they took the antibiotics. 2

Antibiotic resistance can frequently be traced directly to leftover or unfinished medications that have been hidden in homes or sold illegally online without a valid prescription. To combat this issue, it is crucial that governments around the world implement appropriate regulation systems so that appropriate safety precautions are taken whenever possible. 1 Self-medication with antibiotics (SMA) is a prevalent manifestation of antibiotic misuse that can result in a number of harmful consequences, including antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Antibiotic storage at home raises the risk of SMA.

For instance, a study reported that most of the participants believe that antibiotics can be used to treat influenza and the common cold, and antibiotics should be kept at home and used when a family member becomes ill. 3 Similarly a study conducted in Kuwait revealed that 50% of the self-medicated respondents indicated that they had given an antibiotic to another person without a doctor’s prescription. 4 A study was conducted to determine the prevalence of antibiotic self-medication in Saudi Arabia. More than one-third of respondents (43.4%) indicated that they sometimes self-medicate with antibiotics. The most common source of antibiotic self-medication was a previous prescription (36.6%). 5 According to a study conducted in China, 48.1% of participants kept antibiotics at home for their children. Regarding the origins of antibiotics, 63.1% of participants who kept antibiotics at home obtained them through a previous prescription, whereas 35.3% reported purchasing their antibiotics from pharmacies. 6

Likewise, a study conducted in Qatar found that nearly half of participants believed antibiotics could be used to treat viral illness. 7 This study also found that 82% of participants used antibiotics without a prescription, 37% used antibiotics prescribed for another family member, and 27% used antibiotics prescribed to them for a similar condition. 7

According to research conducted in Saudi Arabia, certain risk factors may be more prevalent in Saudi Arabia than in other countries. As presented by a Riyadh hospital, one of the risk factors is the misuse of antibiotics. Unoptimized antibiotic dosage is another risk factor for the development of bacterial resistance. In addition, one of the most significant risk factors is travel to Saudi Arabia’s holy cities, which presents an opportunity for the spread of infectious diseases. 8 Several factors have been linked to increase in antibiotic resistance, including self-medication, cultural factors, behavioral factors, lack of health education, socioeconomic. 9 The use of antibiotics without a prescription by a patient or other family members and their inappropriate storage have caused serious health issues as it would lead to antibiotic resistance and exposure to risk of harmful adverse effects unnecessarily. It is evident from the above literature that antimicrobial resistance and misuse of antibiotics has been increasing around the world. Studies conducted in Saudi Arabia about the use of antibiotics have been published around 3-8 years old. Furthermore, Saudi Ministry of Health (MOH) implemented a restriction policy for antibiotics use in 2018. 10 Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the current behaviour of antibiotic usage, storage, re-usage and misuses among the residents of Saudi Arabia. Exploring the causes behind their storage in homes and reuse will help us identify the problem in depth and help in recommending effective solutions.

Methods

Study design and study area

The study design was a cross-sectional online survey, 11 and was distributed through different social media platforms to the residents of Saudi Arabia in different regions. A link to google form has been distributed through email, Facebook, and WhatsApp to the residents of Saudi Arabia. More than 1000 forms have been received. Missing information, incomplete forms and those who were less than 18 years were excluded and a total of 738 participants were included in the study.

Study time period

The study was conducted after the ethical approval was taken. The data collection was started on 29 July 2022 and completed on 31 December 2022.

Target population

The study included participants that were currently residing in Saudi Arabia; male and female both were included, and those who were ≥18 years of age.

Sample size and sampling technique

As this electronic survey was conducted in all regions of Saudi Arabia, a cluster sampling technique was used to collect the data from 738 participants. The minimum required sample size of 700 was calculated using the level of precision formula by placing the following values

n=Z2×p×qd2×DE,

where (Z=1.96, p=0.50, q=0.50, d=0.05, DE =2).

Instrument of data collection and patient consent

A self-prepared questionnaire was used to collect data from the participants. The questionnaire was sent to expert to check its content validity. The questionnaire was then edited based on expert opinion. The final draft was face validated which was deemed reasonable. The questionnaire had three sections. Section one contained questions about the demographic data, section two contained questions about the knowledge of antibiotics, and section three contained questions about solutions. Informed consent was the part of online questionnaire and only participants who were voluntarily willing to participate filled the questionnaire.

Data analysis

The data was entered and analyzed using SPSS 26.0 (v.26.0, IBM Corporation, New York, USA) (RRID:SCR_002865). Mean and standard deviation will be given for quantitative variables. Frequencies and percentages were given for qualitative variables. Knowledge scores were calculated by counting the correct answers, which were then converted to percentage to see whether the participants had poor, good or excellent knowledge. Pearson-Chi-Squared/Fisher Exact tests were applied to observe associations between qualitative variables. A p-value of <0.05 will be considered as statistically significant.

Results

The participants of all ages, genders, nationalities, and socioeconomic backgrounds, residing in various regions of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia participated in the study, and 738 responded to the online questionnaire (see Table 1). 12 Majority of the respondents (76.42%) knew that an antibiotic was a chemical substance used to treat infections, 14.09% (n=104) thought it was used to relieve pain, 3.25% (n=24) thought it was used to reduce fever, and 6.23% (n=46) had no idea. “When asked when they begin using antibiotics”, 95.66% (n=706) of the participants responded that “after consulting a physician”, whereas 3.25% and 1.08% practiced self-medication with reasons of onset of illness and after failed herbal treatment. When asked for which symptoms people most frequently use antibiotics, the following responses were provided: 38.08% (n=281) reported a sore throat, 32.11 (n=237) a fever, 27.10% (n=200) a cold, and 2.71% (n=20) a cough. Around less than one-third of the respondents, (28.32%) selected allergy as the most common side effect of antibiotics, followed by 21.82% (n=161) who selected stomachache, 7.87% (n=58) selected rash, and 5.01% (n=37) selected difficulty breathing. The remaining participants chose multiple adverse effects. When asked to define antibiotic resistance, 68.43% (n=505) of respondents said it is a microorganism’s adaptability against antibiotics, 3.6% (n=27) said it is a decrease in antibiotic efficacy due to manufacturing errors, and 27.19% (n=206) said they had no idea.

Table 1. Demographics and characteristics of study participants.

Variable n (%)
Preferred Answering Language
Arabic 707 (95.8%)
English 31 (4.2%)
Age
Less than 20 85 (11.52%)
20-30 377 (51.08%)
30-40 131 (17.5%)
More than 40 145 (19.65%)
Marital Status
Single 448 (60.7%)
Married 273 (36.99%)
Divorced 11 (1.49%)
Widow 6 (0.81%)
Do you have children?
Yes 256 (34.69%)
No 482 (65.31%)
Number of children
1 or 2 74 (25.52%)
3 or 4 82 (28.28%)
More than 4 100 (34.48%)
Nationality
Saudi 700 (94.85%)
Non-Saudi 38 (5.51%)
Place of Residence
Central region 566 (76.69%)
Eastern region 67 (9.08%)
Western region 52 (7.05%)
Northern region 17 (2.3%)
Southern region 36 (4.88%)
Level of education
Bachelor degree or higher 549 (74.39%)
High school degree or less 189 (25.61%)
Occupation
Healthcare worker 268 (36.31%)
Non-healthcare worker 470 (63.69%)
Average monthly income
< 10,000 Saudi Riyals (<2660 USD) 427 (63.96%)
≥ 10,000 Saudi Riyals (≥2660 USD) 266 (36.04%)
Do you have any chronic illness?
Yes 613 (83.06%)
No 125 (16.94%)

When asked if they take antibiotics when experiencing any new non-specific symptom, the following responses were given by the participants: 46.07% (n=340) strongly disagreed, 29.95% (n=221) disagreed, 12.47% (n=92) were neutral, 7.32% (n=54) agreed, and 4.2% (n=31) strongly agreed. When asked if they only use antibiotics with a prescription, 71.54% of the participants strongly agreed, 20% agreed, 4.61% were neutral, 1.76% disagreed, and 1.90% (n=14) strongly disagreed. The majority of participants, 71.41% (n=527) responded with strong agreement to the question if they complete the course of prescribed antibiotics, 21% (n=155) with agreement, 4.61% (n=34) with a neutral response, 2.44% (n=18) with disagreement, and 0.54% (n=4) with strong disagreement. When asked if they stored the antibiotics according to the label’s instructions, 91.19% (n=673) said yes, while 8.8% (n=65%) said no.

When asked if limiting antibiotic prescriptions was a good idea, 91.33% (674 of 674) of participants agreed, while 8.67% (n=64) disagreed. When asked whether prescribing antibiotics encourages their misuse, 82.79% of the respondents (n=611) said “yes,” while 17.21% said “no.” When asked what they believed could be done to reduce antibiotic resistance, 35.64 % (n=263) said antibiotics should only be taken when prescribed by a doctor, 18.56% (n=137) said living a healthy lifestyle would increase immunity, lower the risk of infection, and reduce the need for antibiotics, and 11.92% (n=88) said antibiotics should only be used in life-threatening situations. Only 20.05% (n=148) of the respondents have participated in an antibiotics campaign, but 88.08% (n=650) believe that antibiotics campaigns can alter community habits.

There is no correlation between average household income and the storage and reuse of antibiotics (p>0.30). A statistically significant correlation existed between age and the use of unused antibiotics (p=0.0019). The remaining 311 participants did not use any leftover antibiotics: 33 (22.4%) were under 20 years of age, 77 (52.38%) were 20—29 years of age, 18 (12.24%) were 30—40 years of age, and 19 (12.93%) were older than 40 years of age. There was no statistically significant correlation between gender and the use of leftover antibiotics (p>0.05); among the 147 participants who used leftover antibiotics, 79 were male (53.74%) and 68 were female (46.26%). There was a statistically significant correlation between having children and reusing antibiotics; among the 147 participants who reused antibiotics, 30 (20.41%) had children, while 117 (79.59%) did not. There was no statistically significant correlation between the number of children and the use of leftover antibiotics. Eight (26.67%) of the 30 participants who used leftover antibiotics and had one or two children, nine (30%) had three or four children, and 13 (43.33%) had more than four children. There was no statistically significant correlation between the level of education and the use of unused antibiotics. Among the 147 participants who used leftover antibiotics, 102 (69.39%) had a college degree or higher, while 45 (30.61%) did not complete high school. There was no statistically significant correlation between occupation and the use of leftover antibiotics; 45 (30.61%) of the 147 participants who used leftover antibiotics were healthcare workers, while 102 (69.39%) were non-healthcare workers. We also found no statistical significance between chronic illness and knowledge of antibiotics or attitude toward unused antibiotics. Additional answers are depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Knowledge about the Antibiotics.

Figure 1.

Discussion

When asked what antibiotics are and when they should be used, we found that having 738 participants from all regions of Saudi Arabia helped us better understand the participants’ various backgrounds and educational levels. Providing an analysis of the impact of media and awareness campaigns, when asked when they typically begin using antibiotics, 95.66% (n=706) of respondents said after consulting with a physician. This majority may indicate a high level of awareness, but it may also suggest that the health ministry is effectively implementing and monitoring the restrictive system. Another study in Saudi Arabia in 2021 revealed that 82% of participants who could obtain antibiotics did so without a prescription. 13 One reason for this high percentage is that the study was conducted among healthcare students. The studies conducted before the MOH restriction on antibiotics showed a much higher percentage of antibiotic usage without a prescription. 5 , 14 , 15

In our study, most participants took antibiotics after consulting a physician, while others practised self-medication with antibiotics. On the other hand, a study conducted in Kuwait revealed that 27.5% of the study population had taken antibiotics without a prescription. Most (51.9%) of the self-medicated respondents reported giving an antibiotic to another individual. In Kuwait, 59 (31.6%) of self-medicated respondents purchased antibiotics directly from private pharmacies. 4 Likewise, in another study, most of those surveyed (92%) acknowledged using antibiotics that weren’t prescribed after receiving advice from a pharmacist. 16 Antibiotics were provided without a prescription in 77.6% of cases, and the patient’s request in 95% of cases, according to a study that polled 327 pharmacists. 17 Despite Saudi Arabian government legislation stating that antibiotics can only be prescribed by doctors, pharmacies and the general people often disregard this. 18

A study revealed that 81.4% of the respondents believed that antibiotic resistance occurs when the body develops a resistance to antibiotics and ceases to function properly. 19 When asked what they believe could be done to decrease antibiotic resistance, 88.08% (n=650) of respondents believe that antibiotic campaigns can alter community habits. Community-wide attitude shifts can be easily implemented with campaigns, resulting in a decline in antibiotic resistance. There was a statistically significant correlation between participant age and the misuse of antibiotics (p=0.0019). We can attribute the increase in the use of leftover antibiotics in the 20—29 age group to multiple factors, including the high proportion of participants in this age group (51.08%). Numerous perspectives on antibiotic use (n=377) resulted in unregulated use. A recent study conducted in the Aseer region of southern Saudi Arabia revealed that the general populace there lacked understanding about the usage of antibiotics and stressed the significance of raising community awareness while working under the guidance of doctors. 20

There was a statistically significant relationship between having children and reusing antibiotics. This statistic indicates that participants with children were more hesitant than those not having any, either because they feared the side effects of reusing antibiotics or because they were more cautious when it came to their children. A 2022 cross-sectional study revealed that 79% of 183 parents were unaware that antibiotics are ineffective against viral illnesses. 21

Studies have yielded variable results when addressing the decision to stop antibiotics once the patient is symptom-free; however, 71.1% of patients did not complete their antibiotic treatment because they felt better. 14 A 2018 survey revealed that 11.6% of respondents believed antibiotics should be discontinued as soon as symptoms subside. While our research yielded similar results to the first study, with 71.41% (n=527) of respondents stating that they completed the course as instructed, the first study had a larger sample size. 22 The presence of expired pharmaceuticals in the home can increase the risk of toxicity, suicide, and accidental poisoning of children. 19 In contrast, unused antibiotics indicate antibiotic misuse and may increase the likelihood of antibiotic resistance. 23

A study determined the prevalence of antibiotic self-medication in Saudi Arabia. Over one-third of respondents, or 43.4% reported that they self-medicate with antibiotics on occasion. 5 While our study demonstrates that the majority of participants only used antibiotics when prescribed, some participants used antibiotics off-label. Tonsillitis and pharyngitis account for 76.7% of all instances of antibiotic self-medication. 5 Our study reveals that 38.08% of individuals who self-medicate with leftover antibiotics do so for sore throat, 32.11% for fever, 27.10% for the common cold, and 2.71% for cough. Another study assessed the knowledge and attitudes of the general population in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, regarding the use of antibiotics. Nearly half of antibiotic users obtained them without a prescription from a retail pharmacy (63.9%), a private clinic (15.3%), or someone else’s supply (20%). This study was published in 2018, before the 2019 announcement of penalties for violating Saudi Arabia’s restrictive regulations. 10 The regulations, announced for the first time in 2015, stipulated that pharmacists who sell antibiotics without a written prescription will be subject to a 100,000 SAR fine, license revocation, or six months in jail. In addition, they discovered that fever, pain, or inflammation were the most common reasons for taking antibiotics (58.2%), followed by respiratory illnesses (21.2%). 15 In a study conducted in Saudi Arabia to evaluate the knowledge of health science students regarding antibiotics, 50% of participants believed antibiotics could be used without consulting a doctor. 13 Most of the participants in our study believed antibiotics should only be used when prescribed, with 48% (n=204) of these respondents being healthcare professionals.

Conclusions

The study indicated that nearly half of the participants used leftover antibiotics. Participants having children in their homes significantly reuse antibiotics. However, one-third of the participants didn’t complete the antibiotics course. While it is understandable that people may believe storing leftover antibiotics will be useful in the event of an emergency, there are numerous risks associated with doing so. Although the Saudi Ministry of Health has implemented stringent measures to reduce antimicrobial resistance caused by antibiotic misuse by restricting the dispensing of antibiotics from pharmacies without a prescription, a sizeable proportion (20%) of our sample participants, regardless of age, level of education, or profession, have continued to store leftover antibiotic pills after an infection treatment and reuse them. This calls for further revision of the current measures to fill those gaps and reduce this practice, such as selling/distributing the exact number of pills required to treat the current infection per prescription and increasing awareness of the consequences of using antibiotics excessively without consulting a doctor. This may also have an economic benefit, as more antibiotic pills will be available for additional prescriptions.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was received from the institutional review board of The Majmaah University for research committee (MUREC) (HA-01-R-088) with the ethical number MUREC-f uly.28/COM-2022/1O-2. Information from the questionnaire will be kept confidential and only used for statistical purposes.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 2; peer review: 1 approved

Data availability

Underlying data

Due to confidentiality of our participants and our university ethical consideration, our data cannot be shared widely/openly. The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request after an Ethical Committee approval (Name: Bader Almehmadi, Assistant professor of medicine, rheumatology consultant; email: b.almehmadi@mu.edu.sa; Article type Research article). The access to the data can be shared/granted for research process only and after the approval involving ethics committee and corresponding author.

Extended data

Figshare: Influence of leftover antibiotics on self-medication in Saudi Arabia أثر بقايا المضادات الحيوية في المنازل على سلوك المعالجة الذاتية في المملكة العربية السعودية .pdf. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22001894.v1 12

This project contains the following extended data:

  • Influence of leftover antibiotics on self-medication in Saudi Arabia أثر بقايا المضادات الحيوية في المنازل على سلوك المعالجة الذاتية في المملكة العربية السعودية .pdf (Questionnaire).

Reporting guidelines

Figshare: STROBE checklist for ‘Influence of leftover antibiotics on self-medication in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study’. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22001603.v1. 11

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

References

  • 1. Awadh AM, Raja AK, Mahdi AI: Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice regarding antibiotics misuse among the public in Saudi Arabia. Egypt. J. Hosp. Med. 2017;69(5):2405–2411. 10.12816/0041684 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Al-Ahmadi S, Yosra A-H: Investigating the appropriateness of antibiotic usage and misuse for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) in the clinics at King Abdul-Aziz Hospital (KAH) in Makkah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Med. Sci. 2020;24(105):3485–3493. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Alhomaidan HT, Shariq A, Almoziraei AM, et al. : Use of Antibiotics among general population of Buraidah, the capital of Qassim Region of Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Med. Dev. Ctries. 2021;5:663–668. 10.24911/IJMDC.51-1609368026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Awad AI, Aboud EA: Knowledge, attitude and practice towards antibiotic use among the public in Kuwait. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0117910. 10.1371/journal.pone.0117910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Alghadeer S, Aljuaydi K, Babelghaith S, et al. : Self-medication with antibiotics in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Pharm. J. 2018;26(5):719–724. 10.1016/j.jsps.2018.02.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Sun C, Hu YJ, Wang X, et al. : Influence of leftover antibiotics on self-medication with antibiotics for children: a cross-sectional study from three Chinese provinces. BMJ Open. 2019;9(12):e033679. 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Aljayyousi GF, Abdel-Rahman ME, El-Heneidy A, et al. : Public practices on antibiotic use: A cross-sectional study among Qatar University students and their family members. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0225499. 10.1371/journal.pone.0225499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Zowawi HM: Antimicrobial resistance in Saudi Arabia: An urgent call for an immediate action. Saudi Med. J. 2016;37(9):935–940. 10.15537/smj.2016.9.16139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Alanazi AM, Alenezi FSG, Alanazi TDM, et al. : Knowledge, attitude and practice of antibiotic use and misuse among adults attending Primary health care in Arar city, Saudi Arabia. Arabia. 2021;25(111):1173–1182. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. MOH : Ministry of health warns against selling antibiotics without prescription. 2018. Reference Source
  • 11. Bader A-M: STROBE checklist for ‘[Influence of leftover antibiotics on self-medication in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study]. figshare.[Dataset]. Online resource. 2023. 10.6084/m9.figshare.22001603.v1 [DOI]
  • 12. Bader A-M: Influence of leftover antibiotics on self-medication in Saudi Arabia أثر بقايا المضادات الحيوية في المنازل على سلوك المعالجة الذاتية في المملكة العربية السعودية.pdf. figshare.[Dataset]. Journal contribution. 2023. 10.6084/m9.figshare.22001894.v1 [DOI]
  • 13. Akbar Z, Alquwez N, Alsolais A, et al. : Knowledge about antibiotics and antibiotic resistance among health-related students in a Saudi University. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2021;15(07):925–933. 10.3855/jidc.12329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. El Zowalaty ME, Belkina T, Bahashwan SA, et al. : Knowledge, awareness, and attitudes toward antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance among Saudi population. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 2016;38(5):1261–1268. 10.1007/s11096-016-0362-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Zaidi SF, Baroom MW, Ibrahim Hanbashi A, et al. : Cross-sectional survey among general population regarding knowledge and attitude toward antibiotic usage in Western Saudi Arabia. Pharmacy. 2021;9(2):98. 10.3390/pharmacy9020098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Nafisah SB, Nafesa SB, Alamery AH, et al. : Over-the-counter antibiotics in Saudi Arabia, an urgent call for policy makers. J. Infect. Public Health. 2017;10(5):522–526. 10.1016/j.jiph.2016.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Bin Abdulhak AA, Al Tannir MA, Almansor MA, et al. : Non prescribed sale of antibiotics in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kurdi S, Faran A, Eareeni E, et al. : Assessment of knowledge and attitude toward the new antibiotic dispensing law and its effect on antibiotic use in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Pharm. J. 2020;28(1):58–67. 10.1016/j.jsps.2019.11.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Eltom EH, Alanazi AL, Alenezi JF, et al. : Self-medication with antibiotics and awareness of antibiotic resistance among population in Arar city, Saudi Arabia. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2022;16(11):1762–1767. 10.3855/jidc.16853 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Al Saleh MM, Alhayyani RM, Assiri YM, et al. : Knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning self-medication with antibiotics among the public in Aseer region, Saudi Arabia. Middle East J. Fam. Med. 2021;7(10):25. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Paredes JL, Navarro R, Watanabe T, et al. : Knowledge, attitudes and practices of parents towards antibiotic use in rural communities in Peru: a cross-sectional multicentre study. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1–9. 10.1186/s12889-022-12855-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Makeen HA, Albarraq AA, Banji OJ, et al. : Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward self-medication in a rural population in South-Western Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Health Sci. 2019;8(1):54. 10.4103/sjhs.sjhs_9_19 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Al-Shareef F, El-Asrar SA, Al-Bakr L, et al. : Investigating the disposal of expired and unused medication in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 2016;38(4):822–828. 10.1007/s11096-016-0287-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2024 Nov 29. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.173086.r333403

Reviewer response for version 2

Anas Ali Alhur 1

1- Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes, based on my observations all other it current and recent citations used and strongly align with the paper. 

2- Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

 Yes, this designed used for the paper is very good to study nature.

3- Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

No, they should provide more info regarding the instance methods the distribution terms, and the names of questionnaire items.

4-If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly, because no advanced analysis was incorporated to enrich the findings.

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes, BUT:

There is room for improvement, and you should avoid reporting the statistics. The study's limitations and future dictions (recommendations) needed to be discussed.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

No

Reviewer Expertise:

Public Health, Health Informatics, Health Information Management, Information seeeking behaviours

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

References

  • 1. : Knowledge and Attitude of self-medication with leftover antibiotics in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. F1000Research .2024;12: 10.12688/f1000research.130364.2 10.12688/f1000research.130364.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2024 Oct 31. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.173086.r332959

Reviewer response for version 2

Vitus Silago 1

The authors have sufficiently addressed my comments. I recommend this manuscript for indexed.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

NA

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2023 Nov 28. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.143118.r219360

Reviewer response for version 1

Vitus Silago 1

Abstract

The conclusion does not reflect what the authors investigated, for instance, the authors investigated individual behavior on how they use antibiotics they were prescribed and not that dispensers at community pharmacies are dispensing without prescriptions. I recommend rephrasing this section to reflect what was done and recommend based on specific findings. The interesting finding is people are not completing their doses, they are misusing antibiotics (one among main drivers of antimicrobial resistance). Therefore, authors may recommend something on proper antibiotics use at community levels.

Introduction

The first paragraph: …..the misuse of unused antibiotics…., what did Authors mean by “unused” antibiotics? If they meant for “left-over” antibiotics then the term (unused antibiotics) is not proper and if the term (unused) antibiotics are not for “left-over” it is important that the Authors define what they mean by “unused antibiotics”

“Left-over” antibiotic indicates that an individual did not complete the full course and the next individual, who may be the same or different person to use the “left-over” antibiotic, will not complete the full course as well. Therefore, from this general knowledge, Authors should add one or two sentences explaining how bacteria develops (or acquires) resistance from incomplete course or left-over

I suggest that Authors shorten the Introduction section particularly by referring few and up-to-date studies on “left-over” and “self-medication”

The last paragraph of Introduction section should cover gap, problem statement and main objective of the study.

Methods

What social media were used to distribute online questionnaires?

How many questionnaires were returned and how many passed to final data analysis after quality check? What were the reasons (e.g., incompleteness, age limits, e.t.c) for dropping out some responses/questionnaires?

The last sentence of “Target population” section is not important, it can be deleted

“Patient consent” and “Instrument of data collection” section may be merged together because they present more similar information

Results

Authors should avoid starting a sentence with numerals

When asked when they begin using antibiotics,

……95.66% (n=706) of the participants responded, after consulting a physician, 3.25 % (n=24) said when they felt ill for any reason, and 1.08% (n=8) replied after first attempting herbal medicine. This sentence is not clear, those 3.25% and 1.08% practiced self-medication with reasons of onset of illness and after failed herbal treatment?

Refer to this sentence “71.41% (n=527) of participants responded with strong agreement to the question, 21% (n=155) with agreement, 4.61% (n=34) with a neutral response, 2.44% (n=18) with disagreement, and 0.54% (n=4) with strong disagreement”, which question did Authors referred to?

Paragraph 4 (last paragraph of Results section): it is important to perform sub-analysis (if data is available) on the proportion of participants with left-over antibiotics at their homes. This will highlight on the burden of incomplete antibiotic use (and most important the risk of using left-overs) among studied population before reporting factors driving for incomplete antibiotic use

Discussion

First paragraph, last sentence: a study from 2021 is contradicting with the findings of the current study and Authors should clearly state this. The previous study shows that 82% of participants obtained antibiotics without prescriptions indicating poor practice among community dispensers (most likely) while the current study shows that 95.66% of respondents obtained antibiotics after medical consultation hence with prescriptions. What could be the possible reason(s) if any for this significant change?

Second paragraph, second sentence: Authors wrote that, “97 (51.9%) of the self-medicated respondents reported giving an antibiotic to another individual without a prescription”. For my opinion, if an individual self-medicate him/herself, use incomplete course, and then hand-over the left-over antibiotic to the next person it is obvious that no prescription will be required or provided. Therefore, it is not important to end the sentence with “without a prescription”.

General comment on Discussion section: Authors kept on repeating their results instead of discussing them.

Conclusion

It should be revised. For example, measures implemented by the Ministry of Health (Saudi Arabia) notably limiting community access to antibiotics from community pharmacies without prescription has nothing to do with people’s behavior of using incomplete antibiotic use and storing them for future use. Moreover, it should be noted that it is not “excess” antibiotics (excess sounds like they were prescribed extra antibiotics from actual course they were supposed to be prescribed), this needs correction.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Antimicrobial Resistance and Molecular Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2024 Oct 6.
Bader Almehmadi 1

Dear Reviewer, 

Thank you for the suggestion, changes have been done accordingly throughout the manuscript.

F1000Res. 2023 Nov 27. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.143118.r209852

Reviewer response for version 1

Mohamad Al-Tannir 1

  1. Title and objective do not perfectly align.

  2. The Introduction is written as a literature review of a proposal rather than an introduction of a manuscript.

  3. Methods section lacks important information about the questionnaire and its validity, and the sample size seems underestimated. IRB name and Log should be provided.

  4. Results section is written inappropriately.

  5. Discussion section should follow the rule of 7 paragraphs of a discussion of a scientific manuscript.

  6. English proofreading is a must.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

No

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

No

Reviewer Expertise:

Public health, multidisciplinary clinical research and clinical trials.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2024 Oct 6.
Bader Almehmadi 1

  1. Title and objective do not perfectly align.

    response: changes have been made

  2. The Introduction is written as a literature review of a proposal rather than an introduction of a manuscript.

      response: Introduction has been thoroughly edited as per the reviewer suggestions

  3. Methods section lacks important information about the questionnaire and its validity, and the sample size seems underestimated. IRB name and Log should be provided.

    response: changes have been made. IRB details and log is provided in the end of study.

  4. Results section is written inappropriately.

    response:  changes have been made

  5. Discussion section should follow the rule of 7 paragraphs of a discussion of a scientific manuscript.

      response:  changes have been made

  6. English proofreading is a must.  response:  changes have been made

F1000Res. 2023 Sep 29. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.143118.r205470

Reviewer response for version 1

Juan Manuel Vazquez-Lago 1

Thank you very much for allowing me to review this work. It is an interesting work, focused on a major public health problem, the use of antibiotics. However, the article, from my point of view, needs improvement to be published in this journal.

Formal aspects: The text does not present line numbering, which makes it difficult to prepare a review report.

Abstract:

  1. Methods: The methods reflected in the abstract are scarce. Is the questionnaire used a validated questionnaire?

  2.  Results: Part of the results are methodology. "from all ages...of Saudi Arabia", since they are inclusion criteria (they do not contribute anything to the results section. The response rate to the questionnaire, the distribution of the sample in terms of sex and age (mean and SD). Where "147 participants..." is reported, it does not provide much information to the results (a relative value is better).

  3. Conclusions: The conclusions expressed in the abstract are not supported by the results. It must be rewritten.

Introduction:

  1. It must be reduced. It is difficult to read. The introduction should be structured in 3 paragraphs: (1) describe the topic within which the text is framed; (2) report the gap or lack of knowledge that the text attempts to resolve; (3) propose the questions or objectives that guide the text

Methodology: this section is very brief. It should be improved.

  1. The questionnaire is not provided. It should be contributed to be able to value it. Has this questionnaire been validated on the target population? If not validated, all results are largely compromised. This possible weakness should also be discussed.

  2. Has the questionnaire only been distributed through social networks? People who do not use social networks did not have the opportunity to complete the questionnaire? This is a very important selection bias, as well as an information bias, since access to social networks can be influenced, for example, by social class, educational level, etc., sex...

  3. It is not necessary to include the sample size calculation formula in the text.

Results:

  1. It should be stated how many were sent the questionnaire and how many of them responded. At no time is the response rate reported.

  2. The distribution by sex and age must always be reported in the text.

Discussion:

  1. Poorly structured. It should be reviewed.

  2. In the first paragraph the most notable result of the investigation should always be reported. What does this research contribute new to the scientific world?

  3. There are no references, or at least I have not been able to objectify them, to the limitations and strengths of the design.

  4. You can discuss the results obtained with other recently published articles, in order to increase the external validity of your work. (Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Mar 11;12(3):558. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030558.) (Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Feb 24;12(3):457. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030457.)

Conclusions:

  1. The paragraph that refers to the conclusions is more a part of the discussion. Conclusions should be written in 2-3 short sentences strongly supported by the results.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

No

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

No

Reviewer Expertise:

Antibiotics

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.

References

  • 1. : Knowledge, Perceptions, and Perspectives of Medical Students Regarding the Use of Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance: A Qualitative Research in Galicia, Spain. Antibiotics (Basel) .2023;12(3) : 10.3390/antibiotics12030558 10.3390/antibiotics12030558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. : Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice Regarding Antibiotic Prescription by Medical Interns: A Qualitative Study in Spain. Antibiotics (Basel) .2023;12(3) : 10.3390/antibiotics12030457 10.3390/antibiotics12030457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Bader A-M: STROBE checklist for ‘[Influence of leftover antibiotics on self-medication in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study]. figshare.[Dataset]. Online resource. 2023. 10.6084/m9.figshare.22001603.v1 [DOI]
    2. Bader A-M: Influence of leftover antibiotics on self-medication in Saudi Arabia أثر بقايا المضادات الحيوية في المنازل على سلوك المعالجة الذاتية في المملكة العربية السعودية.pdf. figshare.[Dataset]. Journal contribution. 2023. 10.6084/m9.figshare.22001894.v1 [DOI]

    Data Availability Statement

    Underlying data

    Due to confidentiality of our participants and our university ethical consideration, our data cannot be shared widely/openly. The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request after an Ethical Committee approval (Name: Bader Almehmadi, Assistant professor of medicine, rheumatology consultant; email: b.almehmadi@mu.edu.sa; Article type Research article). The access to the data can be shared/granted for research process only and after the approval involving ethics committee and corresponding author.

    Extended data

    Figshare: Influence of leftover antibiotics on self-medication in Saudi Arabia أثر بقايا المضادات الحيوية في المنازل على سلوك المعالجة الذاتية في المملكة العربية السعودية .pdf. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22001894.v1 12

    This project contains the following extended data:

    • Influence of leftover antibiotics on self-medication in Saudi Arabia أثر بقايا المضادات الحيوية في المنازل على سلوك المعالجة الذاتية في المملكة العربية السعودية .pdf (Questionnaire).

    Reporting guidelines

    Figshare: STROBE checklist for ‘Influence of leftover antibiotics on self-medication in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study’. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22001603.v1. 11

    Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES