Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2024 Nov 1;16(11):e72835. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72835

Unlocking the Cervix: Biological Mechanisms and Research Gaps in Preterm Birth

Joana Félix 1,2,✉, Carla Bartosch 3, Alexandra Matias 4
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC11608575  PMID: 39618778

Abstract

Preterm birth (PTB), defined by the WHO as delivery before 37 completed weeks of gestation, remains a significant global health challenge and the leading cause of neonatal mortality. Despite extensive efforts to prevent PTB, rates have remained stable, largely due to an incomplete understanding of its underlying pathophysiology. While research has traditionally focused on the myometrium and foetal membranes, the cervix's critical role in maintaining pregnancy and initiating labour is increasingly recognized but still often underexplored. This review aims to consolidate current knowledge on cervical function and remodelling during pregnancy and labour while identifying key research gaps and potential intervention strategies. A comprehensive literature review spanning 50 years was conducted using PubMed, identifying 114 studies that met the inclusion criteria. These studies examined cervical function during labour, spontaneous PTB, and the molecular mechanisms involved in cervical remodelling (CR). The review highlights significant molecular differences in cervical remodelling between term and preterm births. Critical processes such as extracellular matrix (ECM) remodelling, immune cell activity, and genetic predispositions vary depending on the specific triggers and gestational age at the onset of labour. Inflammatory responses are especially heightened in preterm births, particularly those driven by infections. However, much of the current data are derived from animal models, which may not accurately represent human physiology. In conclusion, a deeper understanding of the complex molecular mechanisms driving cervical remodelling is crucial to addressing PTB. Future research should prioritize human tissue studies to bridge the gap between animal models and human physiology. Developing targeted interventions that address cervical insufficiency and improve pregnancy outcomes is essential for reducing PTB rates.

Keywords: cervical extracellular matrix, inflammatory response, labour genetic predisposition, molecular mechanism of cervical remodelling, preterm labour

Introduction and background

Background

Preterm birth (PTB) is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as birth before 37 completed weeks of gestation or fewer than 259 days from the first day of a woman’s last menstrual period [1]. The global prevalence of PTB is estimated at around 9.9%, with significant regional variations and a higher burden in low- and middle-income countries [2-4].

PTB is a major concern due to its severe impact on neonatal mortality and long-term health complications, resulting in approximately 3.1 million neonatal deaths annually. It is associated with acute conditions such as respiratory distress syndrome and necrotizing enterocolitis, as well as chronic disorders, including cardiovascular and neuropsychiatric issues [5-8]. Beyond immediate neonatal care, PTB imposes substantial economic and healthcare costs and perpetuates a generational cycle of preterm births [6,9,10].

While global health initiatives, including the Millennium Development Goals, have aimed to reduce preterm birth rates, progress has been limited [11,12]. PTB is a multifactorial syndrome with many underlying causes, such as infections, maternal health conditions, and genetic factors, which makes it difficult to address with a single approach. Additionally, the aetiology of PTB is still not fully understood, which hinders the development of effective screening methods and therapeutic interventions. Ongoing research is crucial to better understand the diverse mechanisms behind PTB and to develop targeted, successful strategies.

Addressing PTB is challenging due to its multifaceted causes [13]. Research from the 1990s identified premature cervical remodelling (CR) as a key factor in PTB risk [14]. Romero et al. highlighted cervical ripening as a hallmark of "premature parturition syndrome," emphasizing CR as a primary molecular event in PTB [15]. This underscores the cervix’s crucial role in PTB development and suggests that targeting CR could be a promising approach for screening and intervention strategies. This review aims to summarize current knowledge of cervical function in both normal and premature labour and its role in triggering PTB, while identifying critical gaps for future research.

Review

Methods

Our literature review examined clinical studies, systematic reviews, and literature reviews on the role of the cervix in labour, particularly premature labour. We searched the PubMed database for full-text studies published in English or Portuguese over the past 50 years, using the search terms: "role of cervix in spontaneous preterm birth," "cervix in labour," "cervical biopsies in labour," and "cervical biopsies in preterm labour."

The inclusion criteria encompassed studies investigating the function of the cervix during labour, research addressing the role of the cervix in spontaneous preterm birth, animal studies exploring cervical roles in preterm birth, and studies utilizing cervical biopsies to examine molecular and cellular processes during cervical remodelling in labour. In contrast, we excluded articles focused on multiple pregnancies, research on induced preterm birth, studies investigating preterm birth with known causes (e.g., infection, hydramnios, foetal malformation), and biopsy studies primarily aimed at detecting cervical lesions.

Initially, 467 articles met the inclusion criteria and underwent abstract review. After applying the exclusion criteria, the final number of articles included in the review was 114 (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Study flowchart (PRISMA).

Figure 1

Cervical function, structure, and remodelling during pregnancy

The cervix acts as a vital mechanical barrier throughout pregnancy, remaining closed until term and undergoing substantial remodelling for successful delivery. Understanding CR is crucial, as deviations from normal patterns increase the risk of PTB. Despite extensive research, knowledge of cervical tissue mechanics remains limited due to the challenges of studying cervix samples during pregnancy, a period often considered a "protected state." Advances in animal studies, imaging technologies, and molecular biology have offered valuable insights into these processes and their implications for pregnancy outcomes.

The cervix is composed of multiple tissue layers, each with a specific function. Its epithelial outer surface, facing the vagina, is lined with stratified squamous epithelium, which protects it from physical trauma and infections. The inner epithelial portion, the endocervix, is lined with columnar epithelial cells that secrete mucus, which plays a key role in fertility by controlling the passage of sperm [16,17]. Beneath these epithelial layers lies the stroma, a structure made up of dense extracellular matrix (ECM) and various cell types. The ECM, consisting of fibrillar collagens, elastin fibres, proteoglycans, glycosaminoglycan’s (GAGs), and matricellular proteins, is essential for the cervix's mechanical properties and structural integrity [18-20]. Cells such as fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells, immune cells, glandular cells, and vascular cells each play specialized roles in matrix production, tone regulation, and immune response [16,21]. Additionally, the cervix is highly vascularized and innervated, ensuring adequate blood flow and sensory function. Notably, unlike the rest of the uterus, the cervix exhibits increased innervation throughout pregnancy [22]. 

Traditionally, the cervix has been viewed as a homogeneous structure, with the ECM comprising 85-90% of its content and cells contributing only 10-15% [20,23,24]. However, recent research has revealed a more intricate and heterogeneous architecture, with regional variations in collagen dynamics and cellular composition [23-25]. Optical coherence tomography has highlighted the presence of circumferential collagen fibres in the middle stroma, which are crucial for maintaining cervical integrity and resisting dilation [22]. Additionally, differences in collagen cross-linking and smooth muscle distribution, especially at the internal os, suggest specialized functions and higher contractility in these regions [25-29]. This evidence underscores the need to recognize location-specific differences in cervical architecture and cell distribution, as these significantly influence the cervix’s role during pregnancy and labour [20].

During pregnancy, the cervix serves a dual function: it acts as a formidable barrier against microbial invasion and mechanical stress from the expanding uterus while also undergoing a controlled softening and dilation process to facilitate childbirth. This delicate balance is essential for ensuring a healthy pregnancy and safe delivery [17,29-31]. Cervical remodelling during pregnancy occurs in four overlapping phases: softening, ripening, dilation, and postpartum repair. Softening increases the cervix’s pliability, followed by ripening, which enhances its compliance in preparation for dilation. After childbirth, the cervix undergoes postpartum repair to restore its function for future pregnancies [22,31-33]. Effective cervical remodelling is vital for delivery, as uterine contractions alone cannot facilitate labour if the cervix remains rigid [17,23,26,33-37].

Cervical softening is the initial phase of this transformation, marked by changes in tissue properties, such as reduced stiffness and increased compliance, while maintaining tissue integrity [18,25]. Early signs of softening, driven by cellular proliferation and matrix remodelling involving fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and epithelial cells, can appear as early as one month after conception [17,18,27,32]. Recent research has explored several biomarkers and imaging methods for detecting early cervical changes linked to preterm birth risk. Biomarkers like foetal fibronectin (fFN), IL-6, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) show promise as early indicators due to their association with cervical remodelling and inflammation [19,38,39].

For imaging, transvaginal ultrasound remains the primary non-invasive tool for assessing cervical length (CL), a key predictor of preterm birth. Also, elastography has emerged as a promising technique for assessing cervical stiffness, detecting early softening before significant shortening occurs [40,41].

At this stage, architectural changes in the ECM are characterized by increased collagen turnover and reduced cross-linking. As pregnancy progresses and matures, cross-linked collagen is gradually replaced by less cross-linked forms, facilitating cervical softening while maintaining structural integrity [20,25-27]. During this process, collagen type I fibres evolve from long, thin structures to thicker, curved forms, though the overall content of collagen type I remains stable [20,21,25-27,29,30]. Additionally, cervical epithelial cells play a critical role in providing immunoprotection and maintaining the barrier to safeguard the stroma during ECM remodelling [21].

Following softening, cervical ripening is critical for preparing the cervix for dilation. This phase involves structural changes such as an elevated Bishop Score and a reduced ability of the cervix to maintain closure as a load-bearing organ [18,42-44]. ECM changes during ripening include altered collagen cross-linking, increased fibre diameter, and shifting from straight to wavy fibres [20,21]. GAGs, particularly hyaluronic acid (HA), play critical roles in collagen packing and tissue hydration, with HA levels rising due to oestrogen-driven upregulation of hyaluronan synthase (Has) 2 [17,21,32,42,45,46]. This increase in HA solubilizes collagen, triggering an inflammatory response that is crucial for ripening. Elevated proteoglycans also regulate ECM organization, influencing cellular adhesion and proliferation [17,47].

In the 1980s, Mont Liggins proposed that immune cell infiltration during cervical ripening leads to ECM degradation and remodelling. However, this idea has since been challenged, as it was based on studies using postpartum biopsy samples, which more likely reflect tissue repair mechanisms after childbirth rather than the pre-labour ripening process [21,29,42,48,49]. Recent research suggests that inflammatory cells and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) primarily aid in active dilation and postpartum repair rather than initiating ripening [17,21,29,42,47,48,50-53]. Current evidence indicates that cervical ripening is mainly driven by collagen reorganization through increased GAG synthesis rather than an inflammatory response [17].

Epithelial cells also contribute to ripening by providing barrier protection and facilitating enzymatic activity [54,55]. This process involves controlled adjustments in barrier properties, hydration levels, and intercellular communication [56-58]. Reversible epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and its counterpart, mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET), regulate cellular remodelling in both the amnion and cervix, driven by steroid hormones during gestation [21,31]. Research suggests that oestrogen promotes EMT, cellular migration, and cervical inflammation, while progesterone supports tissue repair and counteracts infection or inflammation in the cervix [59-64].

The final stage, dilation, is often difficult to distinguish from ripening, as the two phases overlap [17,18,21,32,42]. At term, increased macrophage and neutrophil densities and higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines are associated with cervical dilation [16,17,29,32,65]. Structural changes such as collagen degradation and altered cell density further characterize this phase [29].

Premature cervical remodelling as a contributing factor to preterm birth

Recent research by Romero et al. has highlighted cervical ripening as a critical component of what is termed “premature parturition syndrome.” They noted that PTB frequently involves early changes in gestational tissues occurring weeks before labour onset. Specifically, signs of cervical ripening-such as cervical shortening and internal os patency-can be detected through vaginal examinations and ultrasound imaging weeks before a spontaneous preterm labour [17,33,34,37,66-76]. Understanding early cervical changes provides a crucial opportunity for preventing preterm birth by enabling the identification of high-risk patients through biomarkers or advanced imaging techniques. Early detection allows clinicians to intervene before the cervix reaches a critical stage of ripening, offering the chance for timely interventions, such as progesterone or cervical cerclage. This knowledge also highlights a sequence of physiological events that could be targeted for screening and intervention, potentially improving pregnancy outcomes [15,33].

Initially described as "precocious cervical ripening" by Papiernik et al. in 1986, the phenomenon has evolved into the concept now recognized as "premature cervical remodeling." This term encompasses a range of processes, including softening, shortening, and dilation of the cervix [34,77]. Research demonstrates an inverse relationship between CL and gestational age at birth, which challenges the traditional view of cervical incompetence (CI) as a binary condition [34,37,67-72,78-80]. Recognizing and monitoring these early cervical changes can provide a crucial window for screening and identifying women at increased risk of preterm labour. However, to devise effective interventions, further exploration into the underlying pathophysiology of premature cervical remodelling and the implications of a shortened cervix is essential [15,81].

A multitude of factors have been associated with a short cervix, including the cessation of progesterone action, congenital cervical hypoplasia, history of previous cervical surgeries, and infections. Despite these associations, the precise mechanisms contributing to cervical "failure" and the resulting development of a sonographically short cervix remain poorly understood [80,82-86]. Key challenges in elucidating cervical “failure” include the lack of consistent definitions, the scarcity of robust human data, and methodological discrepancies in research. These discrepancies may arise from variations in biopsy locations, timing, and the presence of inadequate control groups [22,87]. This review aims to address these critical issues by synthesizing and examining evidence from both animal models and human studies. Through this approach, we hope to clarify the known mechanisms underlying premature cervical remodelling while identifying gaps in knowledge. This will enable us to design studies that enhance our understanding and explore novel screening methods and treatment strategies that could be implemented to improve outcomes for at-risk populations.

Molecular mechanisms linked to premature cervical remodelling: insights from animal studies

Much of our understanding of labour, both physiological and premature, has been derived from animal models due to the challenges in obtaining human cervical samples during pregnancy. Research utilizing these models has provided valuable insights into the mechanisms of labour, bridging theoretical knowledge with practical applications in human obstetrics. However, while animal models offer valuable insights into the biological mechanisms underlying cervical changes, their findings may not fully translate to human physiology. For example, in mice, labour is linked to a decline in progesterone levels, a phenomenon that is not observed in humans. It is essential to recognize the significant differences in reproductive anatomy, hormonal regulation, and gestational timelines. Therefore, caution is warranted when extrapolating findings from animal models to human contexts. A thorough understanding of both the similarities and differences between species is crucial before drawing direct correlations (Table 1) [66,88-93].

Table 1. Advantages and limitations of animal models in cervical remodelling and preterm birth research.

Animal model Advantages Limitations
Rodents Cost-effective, can study large sample sizes, short gestation period, with rapid data collection and genetic manipulation tools available. Significant anatomical and hormonal differences from humans
Sheep Similar cervical structure and reproductive physiology to human, larger size facilitates surgical interventions and tissue collection. Higher cost, complex management, and fewer tools for genetic modifications.
Non-human Primates Closest to human reproductive biology High cost of maintenance and ethical considerations; fewer animals available for studies.
Guinea pigs Similar cervical changes to humans Longer gestation periods than rodents; different reproductive physiology
Rabbits Accessible and cost-effective Differences in cervical structure and remodelling

ECM changes of the cervix can manifest through various processes, depending on the triggers that lead to ripening. For instance, RU486 (mifepristone) models show accelerated cervical ripening, with pronounced matrix disorganization and partially activating pro-inflammatory and repair processes akin to postpartum changes through mechanisms distinct from term ripening [21,94,95]. In contrast, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatment induces cervical changes and labour within hours of exposure with architectural alterations of the collagen matrix that resemble those seen in term ripening [21,95]. Additionally, the expression of matrix synthases differs under these conditions, with HAs two genes increasing near term, while Has1 expression rises in preterm scenarios [17,32,95].

Prostaglandin expression plays a critical role in cervical remodelling, as they reduce cervical resistance by reorganizing collagen fibrils [96]. In models of premature parturition, the expression of prostaglandin-cyclooxygenase-endoperoxide synthase (Ptgs) is upregulated, with Ptgs1 levels heightened in RU486-induced ripening and Ptgs2 activated in LPS models [95]. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which inhibit prostaglandin production, have been shown to effectively reduce both term and preterm labour in animal studies. Research indicates that cyclooxygenase (COX) 1 activity is essential for timely term labour in mice, whereas COX 2 expression is induced during inflammation-mediated preterm labour [97,98].

Cellular responses vary significantly depending on the trigger that induces labour. In the context of term cervical ripening, neutrophil depletion does not affect the timing or success of parturition, and general inflammatory responses typically begin only after labour has commenced [29,50]. In a transgenic mouse model, cervical ripening did not occur despite the infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages, suggesting that neutrophil activation is not essential for term cervical ripening and that merely having inflammatory cells may not be sufficient to initiate this process [99]. In contrast, RU486-induced premature cervical ripening is associated with a marked increase in tissue monocytes and eosinophils compared to term conditions, while LPS-induced ripening is characterized by elevated neutrophil levels without corresponding changes in monocyte or eosinophil counts [95]. The precise role of eosinophils remains unclear; however, in rodents, an increase in eotaxin-1 transcripts is followed by a rise in eosinophils on the day of birth, indicating that eosinophils may facilitate the differentiation of monocytes into alternatively activated macrophages during postpartum repair [21,42].

Cytokine expression also varies between term and preterm births. In terms of labour, cytokines tend to increase postpartum rather than during labour itself [58]. Conversely, in preterm models, there is a significant rise in the gene expression of neutrophil chemoattractant Cxcl2 and other pro-inflammatory cytokines, with LPS-induced inflammation showing a greater increase than that induced by RU486 [95,100].

Complement activation also seems to play a significant role in labour. Two mouse models of PTB have highlighted the importance of complement activation in CR and the onset of PTB. Findings from these models demonstrated increased deposition of cervical complement component (C) 3 and elevated levels of C5a in PTB cases compared to gestational age-matched controls. Furthermore, C5a receptor (C5aR)-deficient mice failed to exhibit cervical remodelling or experience PTB in response to treatments with LPS or mifepristone. This strongly suggests that C5aR is essential for the cervical remodelling process that precedes preterm birth [44,101].

Hormonal influence plays a pivotal role in the processes associated with labour and cervical remodelling. In rodent models, the onset of labour is characterized by a significant decline in maternal progesterone levels, indicating its crucial role in parturition [102-104]. Conversely, multiple animals and in vitro studies have underscored the potential of oestrogen in facilitating cervical ripening, labour, and delivery [105,106]. Increased expression levels of oestrogen receptor α in the cervix have been associated with spontaneous preterm labour and delivery, highlighting oestrogen influence in this context [105-109].

Epithelial cell lesions and disruptions in barrier protection are also associated with premature cervical remodelling. A study utilizing a mouse model demonstrated that the combination of vaginal bacteria and mild cervical injury from a spermicide, which causes cellular damage, led to higher rates of preterm birth compared to exposure to bacteria alone. In contrast, the administration of vaginal progesterone modified the junctional proteins of the cervical epithelium and significantly reduced LPS-induced preterm birth [110-112]. This highlights the critical role of the cervical epithelium in maintaining barrier function against infections and underscores its importance in preventing preterm birth.

Neuromodulation and sensory nerve activity significantly influence reproductive tissue dynamics and cervical remodelling. When stimulated by microorganisms or toxins, sensory nerves in rats release neurotransmitters, initiating local inflammatory responses known as neurogenic inflammation [113,114]. Moreover, oestrogen can stimulate the production of neuropeptides from cervical sensory neurones, which are increased in the cervix during pregnancy, highlighting the intricate interaction between the endocrine and nervous systems [115].

Mechanical forces have recently emerged as a crucial factor in the intricate process of cervical remodelling. Research highlights a strong correlation between mechanical stimuli and biochemical signals, which can lead to significant changes in cellular behaviour and the extracellular matrix. Utilizing proteome-wide technology, studies have investigated the mechano-related signalling molecules present in the mouse cervix, providing valuable insights into how physical forces influence cervical modifications during pregnancy. These investigations have identified an increase in various cytoskeletal components and signalling molecules that correlate with the escalating gravitational forces exerted by the growing foetus on the cervix. This finding underscores the notion that foetal size and weight are not merely passive characteristics; rather, they may play a pivotal role in cervical remodelling through mechano-transduction processes [31].

Molecular mechanism linked to premature cervical remodelling: what we know?

The process of labour is inherently complex and multifactorial, involving a myriad of physiological and biochemical interactions. Given this complexity, it is not surprising that multiple molecular processes may lead to premature CR and subsequently contribute to the risk of PTB. Understanding the molecular mechanisms behind premature CR is crucial for addressing this critical risk factor. Disruptions at both cellular and molecular levels can compromise cervical integrity and trigger preterm labour, influenced by factors such as cellular dysfunction, inflammation, environmental influences, and genetic predispositions.

Cervical epithelial dysfunction compromises the essential barrier that prevents microorganisms from ascending from the vaginal canal to the uterine cavity. Maintaining this barrier is vital during CR, as any compromise can significantly elevate the risk of PTB. Various factors, including cervical surgeries, infections, inflammation, genetic predispositions, and chemical exposure, disrupt this protective barrier, ultimately leading to PTB [16,66,81,110,111].

Reversible EMT, along with its counterpart, MET, orchestrates cellular remodelling in both the amnion and cervix, contributing to the dynamic changes observed during gestation [62,116]. This cyclic remodelling process is intricately regulated by steroid hormones: oestrogen promotes EMT and cervical inflammation, while progesterone supports tissue repair and mitigates adverse effects [59-62]. Disruption of this cycle, triggered by infections or other stressors, can lead to a non-reversible state of EMT, resulting in chronic inflammation and degradation of the cervical matrix. This, in turn, compromises cervical integrity and accelerates premature remodelling [16,29,31,45,47,62-64,116]. These findings underscore the importance of EMT and epithelial functions in maintaining barrier properties and immune surveillance [42,81,116].

Inflammation at the maternal-foetal interface is a critical and common factor associated with PTB. Prolonged cervical inflammation can lead to significant tissue damage, resulting in cervical insufficiency and shortening, which frequently culminates in PTB [110,117-119]. Women diagnosed with cervical insufficiency often exhibit elevated levels of interleukin (IL)-6 in the amniotic fluid, suggesting a strong inflammatory component in these cases [120]. Inflammation can be triggered by both infectious and non-infectious stimuli. Approximately 40% of PTBs are linked to intrauterine infections, which typically originate from ascending bacteria; however, this review does not explore the specifics of these infections in detail [91,110,111,121]. On the other hand, non-infectious stimuli, such as toxic exposure, can also induce a sterile inflammatory response that leads to cervical extracellular matrix remodelling [110,117,122]. Inflammatory processes triggered by infections or non-infectious factors play a crucial role in prematurely remodelling cervical tissues.

Numerous endogenous and exogenous factors contribute to the complex phenomenon of premature CR, yet our understanding of these processes remains incomplete. One significant factor is oxidative stress, which can arise from various sources, including environmental pollutants such as cigarette smoke. A delicate balance between reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidants is essential for maintaining tissue integrity and ensuring optimal maternal-foetal health. When this balance is disrupted, it can lead to premature cellular senescence, chronic inflammation, and an elevated risk of PTB. The specific role of oxidative stress in conditions such as cervical incompetence and short cervix remains somewhat inconsistent, warranting further investigation [117,122]. Cervical trauma and anatomical malformations have also been implicated in the risk of preterm birth [85,123-126]. Endocrine factors, particularly the balance between progesterone and oestrogen, also affect the cervix function [21,31,62]. Furthermore, mechanical factors, including foetal weight and the presence of mechano-sensitive molecules, contribute to the processes of premature cervical remodelling [31]. Understanding how these diverse factors interact and the respective pathways leading to premature cervical remodelling is crucial for developing effective prevention strategies against preterm birth.

Genetic predisposition is another critical element in cervical remodelling. While cervical trauma and inflammation contribute to CI, genetic predispositions explain why only some women with these exposures develop CI and subsequent PTB [123]. Specific polymorphisms in genes involved in connective tissue metabolism and inflammatory responses, such as collagen 1A1, transforming growth factor beta, and the interleukin-10 gene, have been associated with an increased risk of PTB due to their role in disrupting connective tissue regulation [21,78,123,127]. Furthermore, genetic anomalies that affect collagen and elastin synthesis, as observed in conditions like Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and Marfan syndrome, further elevate susceptibility to CI [21,128].

Biomarkers reflect physiological changes and offer valuable insights into the pathways leading to preterm birth [19]. Extensive research has been conducted on various biological fluids to identify effective indicators. Extracellular matrix degradation-related biomarkers, such as fFN, have shown particular promise. The presence of fFN in cervicovaginal fluid after the 24th week of pregnancy indicates matrix disruption and an increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB). In clinical practice, fFN is recognized for its high negative predictive value (NPV), making it a valuable tool in predicting preterm labour [129,130]. Inflammatory markers also play a significant role in cervical changes and can serve as potential screening tools for PTB. For instance, IL-6 is associated with cervical remodelling, while other markers like IL-8 and C-reactive protein (CRP) have demonstrated promise in predicting PTB [19,131,132]. Despite the various biomarkers studied, their relevance to early cervical changes necessitates further investigation.

The interplay between endogenous and exogenous factors such as infections, chemical exposures, mechanical damage, oxidative stress, and endocrine disruptions intersects genetic predispositions to influence premature cervical remodeling. This multifactorial nature of PTB emphasizes that CR involves various pathways influenced by different triggers. Notably, the molecular mechanisms governing CR vary significantly between preterm and term births, as well as among different causes of PTB (Table 2). Understanding both normal and abnormal CR processes is crucial for identifying individuals at risk and developing targeted interventions to mitigate preterm birth linked to cervical insufficiency.

Table 2. Molecular mechanisms linked to premature cervical remodelling.

CR: cervical remodelling; EMT: epithelial-mesenchymal transition; MMP: matrix metalloproteinases; GAG: glycosaminoglycan.

Molecular mechanism Impact on premature cervical remodelling
Cervical epithelial dysfunction Compromises the cervix’s barrier function, increasing susceptibility to infections and inflammation.
Inflammation Involves immune response activation and cytokine release. Chronic inflammation accelerates CR, causing cervical shortening and insufficient cervix.
Oxidative stress The imbalance between reactive oxygen species and antioxidants contributes to premature CR by inducing cellular senescence and sterile inflammation.
Hormonal disruption Hormonal imbalances can precipitate the disruption of normal softening and ripening processes. Oestrogen enhances EMT, cellular migration, and cervical inflammation.
Genetic predisposition Genetic variations in genes related to connective tissue metabolism (e.g., TGF-β, IL-10) increase sensibility to environmental factors.
Matrix metalloproteinases Altered MMP activity can lead to abnormal matrix remodelling and premature CR.
Glycosaminoglycan Changes in GAG composition and metabolism affect matrix hydration and collagen organization and CR.
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition Persistent EMT can disrupt cervical barrier function and stimulate inflammations, promoting early remodelling
Complement activation Increased complement activation enhances inflammatory responses and matrix remodelling and can accelerate CR.
Prostaglandins (PGs) Upregulation of prostaglandins can enhance cervical matrix remodelling and inflammation, leading to premature CR.
Mechanical forces Mechanical stress can induce CR by activating mechano-sensing pathways in cervical tissues.

Clinical implications and future directions

Recent animal studies have highlighted key differences in cervical remodelling between term and preterm births. Term remodelling is primarily characterized by collagen disorganization, while preterm remodelling involves an influx of inflammatory cells, such as neutrophils and mononuclear cells. This distinction is critical, as it suggests that different molecular and cellular pathways may be at play depending on the timing and triggers of labour [29,32,95]. However, significant gaps remain in our understanding of the biological mechanisms of labour, particularly due to the scarcity of human cervical tissue evaluations in affected women, with much of the available data based on animal models [22,32]. Additionally, many studies rely on cervical biopsies obtained postpartum, focusing more on the tissue repair phase than the active remodelling phase. Furthermore, these studies often lack adequately matched control groups in terms of gestational age or use samples from non-pregnant women, limiting the applicability of their findings.

Identifying markers for premature cervical remodelling is crucial for developing effective screening methods. Future research should focus on elucidating the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying cervical changes, including EMT, inflammation triggers beyond infection, the effects of endocrine imbalance, the influence of toxic and exogenous factors, and the role of genetic polymorphisms. Integrating clinical and molecular insights will significantly enhance our understanding of cervical remodelling, ultimately leading to more targeted and personalized interventions for women at risk of preterm birth.

Advancements in non-invasive imaging technologies and biomarker identification present promising avenues for improving screening and monitoring capabilities. However, there is a pressing need for increased research utilizing human cervical tissue to gain deeper insights into the mechanisms of cervical remodelling and develop targeted therapies. For example, molecular studies on the behaviour of inflammatory cells, such as neutrophils and mononuclear cells, in triggering labour could help clarify how inflammation leads to preterm birth and inform the development of targeted interventions. Moreover, tracking cervical changes in high-risk populations throughout pregnancy will help identify early biomarkers that can predict premature cervical remodelling and preterm birth. It is also vital to investigate the impact of environmental exposures, lifestyle factors, and maternal health on cervical remodelling.

The main methodological limitation of this study is the use of a single research database. Additionally, the reliance on animal models and the scarcity of robust human data may limit the generalizability of the findings to human populations.

Finally, integrating the fields of obstetrics, molecular biology, genetics, and bioengineering will facilitate innovative research and clinical applications, making this research fundamental for advancing our knowledge and improving outcomes for at-risk pregnancies.

Conclusions

The cervix plays a critical role in maintaining a healthy pregnancy, undergoing intricate remodelling processes that are essential for successful delivery. Throughout pregnancy, the cervix adapts structurally and functionally, with distinct differences observed between term and preterm birth scenarios. This remodelling is influenced by a multitude of factors, including hormonal changes, mechanical stress, and cellular interactions, all of which contribute to the cervix's ability to function effectively during labour.

Despite the progress made in understanding cervical remodelling, significant gaps persist in our knowledge, particularly regarding the specific mechanisms that govern these processes and their direct implications for preterm birth. Addressing these gaps is crucial for developing targeted interventions to prevent preterm labour. By deepening our understanding of cervical dynamics, we can enhance screening and treatment options, ultimately improving outcomes for women at risk of preterm birth.

Appendices

Search strategy

Objective

To explore cervical function in both normal and premature labour and its role in triggering PTB

Databases Searched

PubMed

Search Terms: 

The following keywords and phrases were used to conduct the literature search:

"role of cervix in spontaneous preterm birth"

"cervix in labour"

"cervical biopsies in labour"

"cervical biopsies in preterm labour"

Inclusion Criteria

  Study Types

     Peer-reviewed original research articles

     Review articles

     Clinical trials

     Meta-analyses

     Animal studies

  Population

     Pregnant women at risk of preterm birth

     Animal models relevant to cervical remodelling and preterm birth

  Language

     English language publications

  Publication Date

     Studies published in the last 50 years to ensure current relevance, with particular emphasis on recent findings.

Exclusion Criteria

Multiple pregnancies

Studies focusing on non-pregnant populations or studies primarily aimed at detecting cervical lesions.

Studies investigating preterm birth with known causes (e.g., infection, hydramnios, foetal malformation

Research lacking a focus on cervical remodelling or preterm birth mechanisms.

Data Extraction

Abstracts and full-text articles were reviewed to extract relevant data concerning the molecular mechanisms, hormonal influences, inflammatory processes, and genetic predispositions linked to premature cervical remodelling.

Key findings related to biomarkers and potential intervention strategies were also noted.

Disclosures

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Joana Félix, Alexandra Matias, Carla Bartosch

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Joana Félix, Alexandra Matias, Carla Bartosch

Drafting of the manuscript:  Joana Félix

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Joana Félix, Alexandra Matias, Carla Bartosch

References

  • 1.Preterm birth. Accessed: 08/01/2024. 2024. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth
  • 2.National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, et al. Lancet. 2012;379:2162–2172. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Chawanpaiboon S, Vogel JP, Moller AB, et al. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7:0–46. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30451-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.National, regional, and global estimates of preterm birth in 2020, with trends from 2010: a systematic analysis. Ohuma EO, Moller AB, Bradley E, et al. Lancet. 2023;402:1261–1271. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00878-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Born too soon: the global action report on preterm birth. [ Oct; 2024 ]. 2012. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241503433 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241503433
  • 6.Outcomes in preterm infants. Platt MJ. Public Health. 2014;128:399–403. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Preterm birth and mortality in adulthood: a systematic review. Crump C. J Perinatol. 2020;40:833–843. doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0563-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.An overview of adult health outcomes after preterm birth. Crump C. Early Hum Dev. 2020;150:105187. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Preterm birth lifetime costs in the United States in 2016: An update. Waitzman NJ, Jalali A, Grosse SD. Semin Perinatol. 2021;45:151390. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Born too soon: preterm birth matters. Howson CP, Kinney MV, McDougall L, Lawn JE. Reprod Health. 2013;10 Suppl 1:0. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-S1-S1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sustainable development goal 3: ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. Sustainable Development Goal 3: ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. [ Sep; 2024 ]. 2022. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal3 https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal3
  • 12.Setting research priorities to improve global newborn health and prevent stillbirths by 2025. Yoshida S, Martines J, Lawn JE, et al. J Glob Health. 2016;6:10508. doi: 10.7189/jogh.06.010508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes. Romero R, Dey SK, Fisher SJ. Science. 2014;345:760–765. doi: 10.1126/science.1251816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Andersen HF, Nugent CE, Wanty SD, Hayashi RH. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:859–867. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91084-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.The preterm parturition syndrome. Romero R, Espinoza J, Kusanovic JP, et al. BJOG. 2006;113 Suppl 3:17–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01120.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Organ-on-chip of the cervical epithelial layer: a platform to study normal and pathological cellular remodeling of the cervix. Tantengco OA, Richardson LS, Medina PM, Han A, Menon R. FASEB J. 2021;35:0. doi: 10.1096/fj.202002590RRR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dynamics of cervical remodeling during pregnancy and parturition: mechanisms and current concepts. Word RA, Li XH, Hnat M, Carrick K. Semin Reprod Med. 2007;25:69–79. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-956777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Relationships between mechanical properties and extracellular matrix constituents of the cervical stroma during pregnancy. House M, Kaplan DL, Socrate S. Semin Perinatol. 2009;33:300–307. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Biomarkers for the prediction of preterm delivery. Vogel I, Thorsen P, Curry A, Sandager P, Uldbjerg N. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84:516–525. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00771.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cervical etiology of spontaneous preterm birth. Vink J, Feltovich H. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21:106–112. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2015.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cervical remodeling in term and preterm birth: insights from an animal model. Mahendroo M. Reproduction. 2012;143:429–438. doi: 10.1530/REP-11-0466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.The pathophysiology of human premature cervical remodeling resulting in spontaneous preterm birth: Where are we now? Vink J, Mourad M. Semin Perinatol. 2017;41:427–437. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.The fibrous nature of the human cervix and its relation to the isthmic segment in gravid and nongravid uteri. Danforth DN. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20287330/ Proc Inst Med Chic. 1947;16:295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.The morphology of the human cervix. Danforth DN. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1983;26:7–13. doi: 10.1097/00003081-198303000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.A systematic evaluation of collagen cross-links in the human cervix. Zork NM, Myers KM, Yoshida K, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:321–328. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.09.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Quantitative evaluation of collagen crosslinks and corresponding tensile mechanical properties in mouse cervical tissue during normal pregnancy. Yoshida K, Jiang H, Kim M, et al. PLoS One. 2014;9:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cervical softening during pregnancy: regulated changes in collagen cross-linking and composition of matricellular proteins in the mouse. Akins ML, Luby-Phelps K, Bank RA, Mahendroo M. Biol Reprod. 2011;84:1053–1062. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.089599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Activity of the human cervix and corpus uteri. Their response to drugs in early pregnancy. Schild HO, Fitzpatrick RJ, Nixon WC. Lancet. 1951;1:250–253. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(51)93313-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Immunobiology of cervix ripening. Yellon SM. Front Immunol. 2019;10:3156. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.03156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Contributions to the dynamics of cervix remodeling prior to term and preterm birth. Yellon SM. Biol Reprod. 2017;96:13–23. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.116.142844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mechanobiology of mice cervix: expression profile of mechano-related molecules during pregnancy. Gordon J, Mowa CN. Cell Tissue Res. 2019;376:443–456. doi: 10.1007/s00441-018-02983-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dynamic changes in cervical glycosaminoglycan composition during normal pregnancy and preterm birth. Akgul Y, Holt R, Mummert M, Word A, Mahendroo M. Endocrinology. 2012;153:3493–3503. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-1950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Overview of spontaneous preterm birth: a complex and multifactorial phenotype. Esplin MS. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57:518–530. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Precocious cervical ripening and preterm labor. Papiernik E, Bouyer J, Collin D, Winisdoerffer G, Dreyfus J. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67:238–242. doi: 10.1097/00006250-198602000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Inflammation and preterm birth: a systematic review. Areia AL, Mota-Pinto A. Reprod Med. 2022;3:101–111. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Inflammatory amplification: a central tenet of uterine transition for Labor. Leimert KB, Xu W, Princ MM, Chemtob S, Olson DM. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:660983. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.660983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:567–572. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199602293340904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Interleukin-6 and its receptors: a highly regulated and dynamic system. Wolf J, Rose-John S, Garbers C. Cytokine. 2014;70:11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2014.05.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fetal fibronectin as a short-term predictor of preterm birth in symptomatic patients: a meta-analysis. Sanchez-Ramos L, Delke I, Zamora J, Kaunitz AM. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:631–640. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b47217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Predictive value of cervical length by ultrasound and cervical strain elastography in labor induction at term. Zhou Y, Jin N, Chen Q, et al. J Int Med Res. 2021;49:300060520985338. doi: 10.1177/0300060520985338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.The role of noninvasive diagnostic imaging in monitoring pregnancy and detecting patients at risk for preterm birth: a review of quantitative approaches. Helmi H, Siddiqui A, Yan Y, et al. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35:568–591. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1722099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cervical remodeling during pregnancy and parturition. Timmons B, Akins M, Mahendroo M. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010;21:353–361. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2010.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Increased level of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 in the ripening process of the human cervix. Stygar D, Wang H, Vladic YS, Ekman G, Eriksson H, Sahlin L. Biol Reprod. 2002;67:889–894. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.005116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Complement activation triggers metalloproteinases release inducing cervical remodeling and preterm birth in mice. Gonzalez JM, Franzke CW, Yang F, Romero R, Girardi G. Am J Pathol. 2011;179:838–849. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.04.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mechanics of cervical remodelling: insights from rodent models of pregnancy. Yoshida K, Jayyosi C, Lee N, Mahendroo M, Myers KM. Interface Focus. 2019;9:20190026. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2019.0026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Regulation of hyaluronan expression during cervical ripening. Straach KJ, Shelton JM, Richardson JA, Hascall VC, Mahendroo MS. Glycobiology. 2005;15:55–65. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwh137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.The transcriptome of cervical ripening in human pregnancy before the onset of labor at term: identification of novel molecular functions involved in this process. Hassan SS, Romero R, Tarca AL, et al. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22:1183–1193. doi: 10.3109/14767050903353216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Macrophages and not granulocytes are involved in cervical ripening. Sakamoto Y, Moran P, Bulmer JN, Searle RF, Robson SC. J Reprod Immunol. 2005;66:161–173. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2005.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Macrophage gene expression associated with remodeling of the prepartum rat cervix: microarray and pathway analyses. Dobyns AE, Goyal R, Carpenter LG, Freeman TC, Longo LD, Yellon SM. PLoS One. 2015;10:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Timing of neutrophil activation and expression of proinflammatory markers do not support a role for neutrophils in cervical ripening in the mouse. Timmons BC, Mahendroo MS. Biol Reprod. 2006;74:236–245. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.105.044891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Interleukin-8 is involved in cervical dilatation but not in prelabour cervical ripening. Sakamoto Y, Moran P, Searle RF, Bulmer JN, Robson SC. Clin Exp Immunol. 2004;138:151–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02584.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.The transcriptome of the uterine cervix before and after spontaneous term parturition. Hassan SS, Romero R, Haddad R, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:778–786. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Physical and biomechanical characteristics of rat cervical ripening are not consistent with increased collagenase activity. Buhimschi IA, Dussably L, Buhimschi CS, Ahmed A, Weiner CP. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1695–1704. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.The extent to which relaxin promotes proliferation and inhibits apoptosis of cervical epithelial and stromal cells is greatest during late pregnancy in rats. Lee HY, Zhao S, Fields PA, Sherwood OD. Endocrinology. 2005;146:511–518. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-0796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.The parturition defect in steroid 5alpha-reductase type 1 knockout mice is due to impaired cervical ripening. Mahendroo MS, Porter A, Russell DW, Word RA. Mol Endocrinol. 1999;13:981–992. doi: 10.1210/mend.13.6.0307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Utilization of different aquaporin water channels in the mouse cervix during pregnancy and parturition and in models of preterm and delayed cervical ripening. Anderson J, Brown N, Mahendroo MS, Reese J. Endocrinology. 2006;147:130–140. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-0896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Processes regulating cervical ripening differ from cervical dilation and postpartum repair: insights from gene expression studies. Timmons BC, Mahendroo M. Reprod Sci. 2007;14:53–62. doi: 10.1177/1933719107309587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Preterm and term cervical ripening in CD1 Mice (Mus musculus): similar or divergent molecular mechanisms? Gonzalez JM, Xu H, Chai J, Ofori E, Elovitz MA. Biol Reprod. 2009;81:1226–1232. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.075309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Estradiol promotes EMT in endometriosis via MALAT1/miR200s sponge function. Du Y, Zhang Z, Xiong W, et al. Reproduction. 2019;157:179–188. doi: 10.1530/REP-18-0424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Estrogen receptor silencing induces epithelial to mesenchymal transition in human breast cancer cells. Al Saleh S, Al Mulla F, Luqmani YA. PLoS One. 2011;6:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Estrogen-related receptor alpha induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition through cancer-stromal interactions in endometrial cancer. Yoriki K, Mori T, Kokabu T, Matsushima H, Umemura S, Tarumi Y, Kitawaki J. Sci Rep. 2019;9:6697. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43261-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Effects of a gestational level of estradiol on cellular transition, migration, and inflammation in cervical epithelial and stromal cells. Tantengco OA, Richardson LS, Menon R. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2021;85:0. doi: 10.1111/aji.13370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and pathologies. Thiery JP. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2003;15:740–746. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2003.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Reversible EMT and MET mediate amnion remodeling during pregnancy and labor. Richardson LS, Taylor RN, Menon R. Sci Signal. 2020;13 doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aay1486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Vaginal progesterone prophylaxis for preterm birth (the OPPTIMUM study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial. Norman JE, Marlow N, Messow CM, et al. Lancet. 2016;387:2106–2116. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00350-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Understanding spontaneous preterm birth: from underlying mechanisms to predictive and preventive interventions. Voltolini C, Torricelli M, Conti N, Vellucci FL, Severi FM, Petraglia F. Reprod Sci. 2013;20:1274–1292. doi: 10.1177/1933719113477496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery. Berghella V, Baxter JK, Hendrix NW. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013:0. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007235.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Clinical practice. Prevention of preterm parturition. Iams JD. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:254–261. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1103640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Impact of cervical length on preterm birth in northern China: a prospective cohort study. Yan H, Gao S, Li N, et al. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33:3209–3214. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1570116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, Elisseou A, Nicolaides KH. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12:312–317. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12050312.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Cervical length for the prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Tommaso M, Berghella V. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2013;8:345–355. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Cervical competence as a continuum: a study of ultrasonographic cervical length and obstetric performance. Iams JD, Johnson FF, Sonek J, Sachs L, Gebauer C, Samuels P. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:1097–1103. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91469-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Cervical funneling: sonographic criteria predictive of preterm delivery. Berghella V, Kuhlman K, Weiner S, Texeira L, Wapner RJ. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;10:161–166. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10030161.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Cervical length at 16-22 weeks' gestation and risk for preterm delivery. Hibbard JU, Tart M, Moawad AH. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:972–978. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01074-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Transvaginal sonographic evaluation of the cervix in asymptomatic singleton pregnancy and management options in short cervix. Arisoy R, Yayla M. J Pregnancy. 2012;2012:201628. doi: 10.1155/2012/201628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Accuracy of cervical transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm birth: a systematic review. Honest H, Bachmann LM, Coomarasamy A, Gupta JK, Kleijnen J, Khan KS. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22:305–322. doi: 10.1002/uog.202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Cervical pessary use and preterm birth: how little we know. Caritis SN, Simhan H. Lancet. 2012;379:1769–1770. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60116-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Genetics of the cervix in relation to preterm birth. Warren JE, Silver RM. Semin Perinatol. 2009;33:308–311. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Short cervix syndrome: current knowledge from etiology to the control. Guimarães Filho HA, Araujo Júnior E, Pires CR, Nardozza LM, Moron AF. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287:621–628. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2740-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Is sonographic assessment of the cervix necessary and helpful? Larma JD, Iams JD. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55:324–335. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182487e96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Inflammation promotes a cytokine response and disrupts the cervical epithelial barrier: a possible mechanism of premature cervical remodeling and preterm birth. Nold C, Anton L, Brown A, Elovitz M. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:208–207. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.A blueprint for the prevention of preterm birth: vaginal progesterone in women with a short cervix. Romero R, Yeo L, Miranda J, Hassan SS, Conde-Agudelo A, Chaiworapongsa T. J Perinat Med. 2013;41:27–44. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2012-0272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: universal cervical length assessment and vaginal progesterone in women with a short cervix: time for action! Campbell S. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:151–158. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Prediction of preterm delivery by sonographic estimation of cervical length. Botsis D, Papagianni V, Vitoratos N, Makrakis E, Aravantinos L, Creatsas G. Biol Neonate. 2005;88:42–45. doi: 10.1159/000084457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis. Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Paraskevaidi M, et al. BMJ. 2016;354:0. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.A sonographic short cervix as the only clinical manifestation of intra-amniotic infection. Hassan S, Romero R, Hendler I, et al. J Perinat Med. 2006;34:13–19. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2006.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Distinct cervical microRNA profiles are present in women destined to have a preterm birth. Elovitz MA, Brown AG, Anton L, Gilstrop M, Heiser L, Bastek J. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:221–211. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.12.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Mechanisms responsible for parturition: the use of experimental models. Jenkin G, Young IR. Anim Reprod Sci. 2004;82-83:567–581. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Endocrine and paracrine regulation of birth at term and preterm. Challis JR, Matthews SG, Gibb W, Lye SJ. Endocr Rev. 2000;21:514–550. doi: 10.1210/edrv.21.5.0407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Preterm birth: an overview. Khandre V, Potdar J, Keerti A. Cureus. 2022;14:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Lancet. 2008;371:75–84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Mifepristone and induction of labour in second half of pregnancy. Padayachi T, Norman RJ, Moodley J, Heyns A. Lancet. 1988;1:647. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91445-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Immunology of term and preterm labor. Peltier MR. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003;1:122. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-1-122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Second harmonic generation imaging as a potential tool for staging pregnancy and predicting preterm birth. Akins ML, Luby-Phelps K, Mahendroo M. J Biomed Opt. 2010;15:26020. doi: 10.1117/1.3381184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.The molecular mechanisms of cervical ripening differ between term and preterm birth. Holt R, Timmons BC, Akgul Y, Akins ML, Mahendroo M. Endocrinology. 2011;152:1036–1046. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-1105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Prostaglandin E2-regulated cervical ripening: analysis of proteoglycan expression in the rat cervix. Ji H, Dailey TL, Long V, Chien EK. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:536–537. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Opposing actions of prostaglandins and oxytocin determine the onset of murine labor. Gross GA, Imamura T, Luedke C, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:11875–11879. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.20.11875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 prevents inflammation-mediated preterm labor in the mouse. Gross G, Imamura T, Vogt SK, Wozniak DF, Nelson DM, Sadovsky Y, Muglia LJ. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2000;278:0–23. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.2000.278.6.R1415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Transgene insertion on mouse chromosome 6 impairs function of the uterine cervix and causes failure of parturition. Word RA, Landrum CP, Timmons BC, Young SG, Mahendroo MS. Biol Reprod. 2005;73:1046–1056. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.105.042663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Signaling via the type I IL-1 and TNF receptors is necessary for bacterially induced preterm labor in a murine model. Hirsch E, Filipovich Y, Mahendroo M. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:1334–1340. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Essential role of complement in pregnancy: from implantation to parturition and beyond. Girardi G, Lingo JJ, Fleming SD, Regal JF. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1681. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Progesterone withdrawal and estrogen activation in human parturition are coordinated by progesterone receptor A expression in the myometrium. Mesiano S, Chan EC, Fitter JT, Kwek K, Yeo G, Smith R. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:2924–2930. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.6.8609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Loss of progesterone receptor-mediated actions induce preterm cellular and structural remodeling of the cervix and premature birth. Yellon SM, Dobyns AE, Beck HL, Kurtzman JT, Garfield RE, Kirby MA. PLoS One. 2013;8:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Progesterone receptor expression declines in the guinea pig uterus during functional progesterone withdrawal and in response to prostaglandins. Welsh TN, Hirst JJ, Palliser H, Zakar T. PLoS One. 2014;9:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Local paracrine effects of estradiol are central to parturition in the rhesus monkey. Nathanielsz PW, Jenkins SL, Tame JD, Winter JA, Guller S, Giussani DA. Nat Med. 1998;4:456–459. doi: 10.1038/nm0498-456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.The role of prostaglandins in the mechanism of lipopolysaccharide-induced proMMP9 secretion from human placenta and fetal membrane cells. Li W, Unlugedik E, Bocking AD, Challis JR. Biol Reprod. 2007;76:654–659. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.106.057034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Cellular turnover in the rat uterine cervix and its relationship to estrogen and progesterone receptor dynamics. Ramos JG, Varayoud J, Bosquiazzo VL, Luque EH, Muñoz-de-Toro M. Biol Reprod. 2002;67:735–742. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.101.002402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Role of sex hormones in cervical changes in a cervical excision-related preterm delivery mouse model. Ahn KH, Kim HY, Cho GJ, Hong SC, Oh MJ, Kim HJ. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;41:138–146. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2020.1727868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Nuclear progesterone receptors in the human pregnancy myometrium: evidence that parturition involves functional progesterone withdrawal mediated by increased expression of progesterone receptor-A. Merlino AA, Welsh TN, Tan H, Yi LJ, Cannon V, Mercer BM, Mesiano S. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:1927–1933. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-0077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Breaking down the barrier: the role of cervical infection and inflammation in preterm birth. Tantengco OA, Menon R. Front Glob Womens Health. 2021;2:777643. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.777643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Cervical epithelial damage promotes Ureaplasma parvum ascending infection, intrauterine inflammation and preterm birth induction in mice. Pavlidis I, Spiller OB, Sammut Demarco G, MacPherson H, Howie SE, Norman JE, Stock SJ. Nat Commun. 2020;11:199. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14089-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Replens prevents preterm birth by decreasing type I interferon strengthening the cervical epithelial barrier. Nold C, Jensen T, O'Hara K, Stone J, Yellon SM, Vella AT. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2020;83:0. doi: 10.1111/aji.13192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Spinal and vagal influences on the responses of rat solitary nucleus neurons to stimulation of uterus, cervix and vagina. Hubscher CH, Berkley KJ. Brain Res. 1995;702:251–254. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)01121-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Sensory nerves and neuropeptides in uterine cervical ripening. Collins JJ, Usip S, McCarson KE, Papka RE. Peptides. 2002;23:167–183. doi: 10.1016/s0196-9781(01)00593-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.The role of sensory neurons in cervical ripening: effects of estrogen and neuropeptides. Mowa CN, Papka RE. J Histochem Cytochem. 2004;52:1249–1258. doi: 10.1177/002215540405201001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Progesterone alters human cervical epithelial and stromal cell transition and migration: Implications in cervical remodeling during pregnancy and parturition. Tantengco OA, Richardson LS, Vink J, Kechichian T, Medina PM, Pyles RB, Menon R. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2021;529:111276. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2021.111276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Oxidative stress promotes cellular damages in the cervix: implications for normal and pathologic cervical function in human pregnancy†. Tantengco OA, Vink J, Medina PM, Menon R. Biol Reprod. 2021;105:204–216. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioab058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Inflammation and pregnancy. Challis JR, Lockwood CJ, Myatt L, Norman JE, Strauss JF 3rd, Petraglia F. Reprod Sci. 2009;16:206–215. doi: 10.1177/1933719108329095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Residency and activation of myeloid cells during remodeling of the prepartum murine cervix. Payne KJ, Clyde LA, Weldon AJ, Milford TA, Yellon SM. Biol Reprod. 2012;87:106. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.112.101840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Interleukin-6, but not relaxin, predicts outcome of rescue cerclage in women with cervical incompetence. Lee KY, Jun HA, Kim HB, Kang SW. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:784–789. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Intrauterine infection and preterm delivery. Goldenberg RL, Hauth JC, Andrews WW. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1500–1507. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Impact of oxidative stress on molecular mechanisms of cervical ripening in pregnant women. Socha MW, Flis W, Wartęga M, Stankiewicz M. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23 doi: 10.3390/ijms232112780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Polymorphisms in the promoter region of the interleukin-10 (IL-10) gene in women with cervical insufficiency. Warren JE, Nelson LM, Stoddard GJ, Esplin MS, Varner MW, Silver RM. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:372–375. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Risk factors for preterm birth: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies. Mitrogiannis I, Evangelou E, Efthymiou A, Kanavos T, Birbas E, Makrydimas G, Papatheodorou S. BMC Med. 2023;21:494. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03171-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Uterine septum and reproductive outcome. From diagnosis to treatment. How, why, when? Daniilidis A, Papandreou P, Grimbizis GF. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2022;14:31–36. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.14.1.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.A short cervix in women with preterm labor and intact membranes: a risk factor for microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. Gomez R, Romero R, Nien JK, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:678–689. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Collagen 1Alpha1 and transforming growth factor-beta polymorphisms in women with cervical insufficiency. Warren JE, Silver RM, Dalton J, Nelson LT, Branch DW, Porter TF. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:619–624. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000277261.92756.1a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Connective tissue and related disorders and preterm birth: clues to genes contributing to prematurity. Anum EA, Hill LD, Pandya A, Strauss JF 3rd. Placenta. 2009;30:207–215. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2008.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Fetal fibronectin in cervical and vaginal secretions as a predictor of preterm delivery. Lockwood CJ, Senyei AE, Dische MR, et al. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:669–674. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199109053251001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Accuracy of cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin test in predicting risk of spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review. Honest H, Bachmann LM, Gupta JK, Kleijnen J, Khan KS. BMJ. 2002;325:301. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7359.301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Early pregnancy biomarker discovery study for spontaneous preterm birth. Beernink RH, Schuitemaker JH, Zwertbroek EF, Scherjon SA, Cremers TI. Placenta. 2023;139:112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2023.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Amniotic fluid interleukin 6 in preterm labor. Association with infection. Romero R, Avila C, Santhanam U, Sehgal PB. J Clin Invest. 1990;85:1392–1400. doi: 10.1172/JCI114583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES