Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1996 Dec 15;497(Pt 3):825–835. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021813

Invariance of the pattern electroretinogram evoked by psychophysically equivalent stimuli in human ageing.

J A Muir 1, H L Barlow 1, J D Morrison 1
PMCID: PMC1160978  PMID: 9003567

Abstract

1. The aim of this study was to assess the contribution of retinal ganglion cells to the decline in contrast sensitivity during human ageing. 2. After determination of the appropriate refraction for each subject, younger subjects were arranged to be exposed to a display luminance which was suprathreshold by the same amount as in older subjects wearing a 4.0 mm diameter artificial pupil with a neutral density filter. 3. In fifty-four subjects, aged 20-99 years, contrast sensitivities measured in response to phase-reversed grating patterns of 2, 5 and 8 cycles per degree declined significantly with increasing age at each spatial frequency studied. 4. Subjects were made psychophysically equivalent by setting the display contrast at x5 and x10 contrast threshold for each subject. The pattern electroretinogram (PERG) was recorded with a sterile silver thread (DLT) electrode placed in the lower canthus of one eye, with the indifferent electrode on the temple and the earth on the forehead. 5. For each contrast multiple at each spatial frequency, the PERG implicit time showed no significant change with age, indicating equivalence of the response across the age range. 6. Control experiments with two young and two elderly subjects established that the PERG implicit time decreased appreciably with increasing contrast, over a range of x2 to x20 contrast threshold. 7. Since the psychophysically equivalent stimulus displays had generated equivalent PERGs in terms of implicit time in young and elderly subjects, this was consistent with the equivalence of retinal ganglion cell function under these conditions. 8. Adverse changes within the retina were therefore inferred to play a major role in the decline in contrast sensitivity with age.

Full text

PDF
825

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arden G. B., Vaegan Electroretinograms evoked in man by local uniform or patterned stimulation. J Physiol. 1983 Aug;341:85–104. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell F. W., Green D. G. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol. 1965 Dec;181(3):576–593. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Celesia G. G., Kaufman D., Cone S. Effects of age and sex on pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987 May;68(3):161–171. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(87)90023-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dawson W. W., Trick G. L., Litzkow C. A. Improved electrode for electroretinography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1979 Sep;18(9):988–991. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Derefeldt G., Lennerstrand G., Lundh B. Age variations in normal human contrast sensitivity. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1979 Aug;57(4):679–690. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1979.tb00517.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Elliott D. B. Contrast sensitivity decline with ageing: a neural or optical phenomenon? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1987;7(4):415–419. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hull B. M., Drasdo N. The influence of age on the pattern-reversal electroretinogram. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1990 Jan;10(1):49–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jay J. L., Mammo R. B., Allan D. Effect of age on visual acuity after cataract extraction. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987 Feb;71(2):112–115. doi: 10.1136/bjo.71.2.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lorenz R., Dodt E., Heider W. Pattern electroretinogram peak times as a clinical means of discriminating retinal from optic nerve disease. Doc Ophthalmol. 1989 Mar;71(3):307–320. doi: 10.1007/BF00170979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mafei L., Fiorentini A. Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings before and after section of the optic nerve. Science. 1981 Feb 27;211(4485):953–955. doi: 10.1126/science.7466369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Maffei L., Fiorentini A., Bisti S., Holländer H. Pattern ERG in the monkey after section of the optic nerve. Exp Brain Res. 1985;59(2):423–425. doi: 10.1007/BF00230925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McGrath C., Morrison J. D. The effects of age on spatial frequency perception in human subjects. Q J Exp Physiol. 1981 Jul;66(3):253–261. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1981.sp002554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Morrison J. D., McGrath C. Assessment of the optical contributions to the age-related deterioration in vision. Q J Exp Physiol. 1985 Apr;70(2):249–269. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1985.sp002907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Morrison J. D., Reilly J. The pattern visual evoked cortical response in human ageing. Q J Exp Physiol. 1989 May;74(3):311–328. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1989.sp003274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Owsley C., Gardner T., Sekuler R., Lieberman H. Role of the crystalline lens in the spatial vision loss of the elderly. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985 Aug;26(8):1165–1170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Owsley C., Sekuler R., Siemsen D. Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood. Vision Res. 1983;23(7):689–699. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90210-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Porciatti V., Burr D. C., Morrone M. C., Fiorentini A. The effects of aging on the pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked potential in humans. Vision Res. 1992 Jul;32(7):1199–1209. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90214-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Porciatti V., Falsini B., Scalia G., Fadda A., Fontanesi G. The pattern electroretinogram by skin electrodes: effect of spatial frequency and age. Doc Ophthalmol. 1988 Sep;70(1):117–122. doi: 10.1007/BF00154742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ross J. E., Clarke D. D., Bron A. J. Effect of age on contrast sensitivity function: uniocular and binocular findings. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985 Jan;69(1):51–56. doi: 10.1136/bjo.69.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Thompson D. A., Drasdo N. Computation of the luminance and pattern components of the bar pattern electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol. 1987 Jun;66(3):233–244. doi: 10.1007/BF00145237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tobimatsu S., Celesia G. G., Cone S., Gujrati M. Electroretinograms to checkerboard pattern reversal in cats: physiological characteristics and effect of retrograde degeneration of ganglion cells. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Oct;73(4):341–352. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90112-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tomoda H., Celesia G. G., Brigell M. G., Toleikis S. The effects of age on steady-state pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol. 1991;77(3):201–211. doi: 10.1007/BF00161368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Trick G. L., Nesher R., Cooper D. G., Shields S. M. The human pattern ERG: alteration of response properties with aging. Optom Vis Sci. 1992 Feb;69(2):122–128. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199202000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Trick G. L., Trick L. R., Haywood K. M. Altered pattern evoked retinal and cortical potentials associated with human senescence. Curr Eye Res. 1986 Oct;5(10):717–724. doi: 10.3109/02713688609000011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Vaegan, Halliday B. L. A forced-choice test improves clinical contrast sensitivity testing. Br J Ophthalmol. 1982 Aug;66(8):477–491. doi: 10.1136/bjo.66.8.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Weale R. A. Senile changes in visual acuity. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1975 Apr;95(1):36–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Weale R. A. Transparency and power of post-mortem human lenses: variation with age and sex. Exp Eye Res. 1983 May;36(5):731–741. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(83)90110-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. van den Berg T. J., Boltjes B., Spekreijse H. Pattern electroretinogram can be more than the sum of local luminance responses. Doc Ophthalmol. 1988 Jul;69(3):307–314. doi: 10.1007/BF00154411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES