Skip to main content
Engineering Microbiology logoLink to Engineering Microbiology
. 2024 Sep 24;4(4):100175. doi: 10.1016/j.engmic.2024.100175

The way to uncovering and utilizing marine microbial resources

Zhi-Feng Zhang 1, Meng Li 1,
PMCID: PMC11611021  PMID: 39628590

Abstract

Recently, Chen et al. published their breakthrough results on a marine microbial genomic catalog and genetic potentials in bioprospecting in Nature, providing unprecedented opportunities for development and utilization of genetic resources of marine microorganisms. To highlight this article, we summarized and highlighted their breakthroughs seriatim

Keywords: Metagenome, MAG, Global ocean microbiome genome catalogue, CRISPR-Cas9, Antimicrobial peptide, PETases

Graphical abstract

Image, graphical abstract


Oceans cover over 70 % of the Earth's surface, and constitute the largest microbial bank on Earth. It is estimated that there are as many as 1010 microbial species and 1029 microbial cells in the ocean [1,2]. Microorganisms survive throughout the entire ocean, including water, sediment, cold seep, hydrothermal vent, and even the trench and sub-seafloor biosphere. Due to the adaption to various habitats, they are characterized by high taxonomic and metabolic diversity, and are known as an important repository of genetic resources for industry, agriculture, and biomedicine [3,4].

With the rapid development of high-throughput sequencing and molecular biology, omics technology combined with synthetic biology has enabled us to explore and utilize the microbial dark matter without culturing from complex environments [5]. Indeed, recent surveys have greatly expanded the microbial phylogenetic diversity, and revealed that the functional diversity had not been captured previously, especially in the ocean, the largest ecosystem on Earth [3,4,[6], [7], [8]]. The potential of marine microbes as a reservoir of new enzymology and natural products for bioprospecting remains largely underestimated. Recently, Chen et al. [9] published their breakthrough results on a marine microbial genomic catalog and genetic potentials in bioprospecting in Nature, providing unprecedented opportunities for development and utilization of genetic resources of marine microorganisms.

Firstly, Chen and colleagues collected and reanalyzed ca. 237 Tb metagenomic data of marine microbiomes from diverse marine ecosystems, ranging from the Antarctic to the Arctic, from the coastal to the deep sea, and from the surface ocean to the ultra-deep abyss of 10,000 m, yielding over 43,100 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). Among them, >20,000 microorganisms are potentially newly discovered species, and nearly 10,000 microorganisms are first discovered in unique habitats such as the deep sea. Based on the generated genomic dataset as well as three additional databases, the authors constructed an integrated global ocean microbiome genome catalogue (GOMC), comprising 24,195 non-redundant genomes in species-level. GOMC is three times larger than the recently reported OMD [4] or OceanDNA [10] database of marine genomes. Furthermore, they constructed a global ocean microbiome protein catalogue (GOPC) by predicting open reading frames of the assembled contigs, yielding 2.458 billion unique genes. GOPC is 60 times larger than the protein sequence database of Tara Ocean [3], providing a more comprehensive resource for bioprospecting. By using well-established deep learning algorithms and molecular approaches in the laboratory, the authors then tested the activity, effectiveness and application potentials of candidate genes in GOMC.

  • 1.

    Genome-editing tools: cas9 is the most widely used and well-known genome-editing tool [11]. In the study, the team identified 36 new CRISPR-Cas9 genes, and tested the editing capability of Om1Cas9, one cas9 gene identified from the bacterial genome of Staphylococcus found in the Mediterranean Sea. They introduced the gene into a model bacterium and measured an editing efficiency of 94 % in vitro.

  • 2.

    Antimicrobial peptides: The authors identified 117 candidate antimicrobial peptides using a deep-learning approach, and successfully synthesized 63 of them by solid-phase peptide synthesis. Then, the authors examined the antimicrobial activities against five bacterial strains, including some human pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Vibrio vulnificus. Ten of the synthesized peptides exhibited antimicrobial activity against at least one of the five tested strains. Among them, cAMP_87, derived from a novel Salinibacteraceae genome, could inhibit the growth of all five microbial strains tested by damaging the bacterial membrane at low peptide concentrations.

  • 3.

    PETases: Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is an artificial polymer material that has become a common source of environmental pollution, due to the difficulty in degrading [12]. Here, the authors identified about 1600 homogenous genes similar to bacterial enzyme IsPETase encoding genes. Heterologous expression and in vitro biochemical characterization determined three halophilic PET hydrolases with superior catalytic activity against amorphous GfPET films from hadal trench and hydrothermal vents water. These three superior PETases displayed 11.8–44.3 times higher catalytic activity than IsPETase under optimal incubation condition. Especially, dsPETase05, the PETase derived from hydrothermal vents, achieved an 83 % depolymerization rate in three days, which is much higher than that of IsPETase.

Overall, Chen et al. [9] established a feasible way from the construction of a marine microbial genomic catalogue, identification of functional genes, to the detection and application evaluation of gene products in the laboratory (Fig. 1). By large-scale genomic data mining and three independent biotechnological explorations, the work provides us strong evidence for the potential of marine microorganisms and offers a valuable guide for exploring biotechnological and biomedical resources from the vast amount of genomic data.

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

The pipeline from microbial genomes to their function potentials. The dashed arrows in first section indicate steps that were not applied by Chen and his colleagues. GOMC: Global ocean microbiome genome catalogue; GOPC: Global ocean microbiome protein catalogue; MAGs: Metagenome-assembled genomes; AMPs: Antimicrobial peptides.

Although the number of microbial genomes from the planet's ecosystems are increasing rapidly in recent years [13], “how may microorganisms are there” is still one of the most fascinating questions. At this juncture, by systematic genome collection of marine microbiome, Chen and colleagues made a quantum leap toward parsing the diversity of earth microorganisms. This research marks a new milestone in the field of marine metagenomics, highlighting the crucial role of marine microbiomes in improving human well-being and promoting environmental sustainability. These findings not only open a new window for the sustainable exploration and utilization of ocean microbial resources, but also lay the foundation for future biotechnology and biomedical studies.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Zhi-Feng Zhang: Writing – original draft. Meng Li: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFA0912200), National Natural Science Foundation of China (32225003, 32393970, 32393971), Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research (2023B0303000017), Shenzhen Medical Research Fund (no. B2301005), Shenzhen University 2035 Program for Excellent Research (2022B002), and research funds from Key Laboratory of Marine Microbiome Engineering of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes and the Synthetic Biology Research Center of Shenzhen University.

References

  • 1.Locey K.J., Lennon J.T. Scaling laws predict global microbial diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2016;113:5970–5975. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521291113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stal L.J. In: The Marine Microbiome. Stal L.J., Cretoiu M.S., editors. Springer; Switzerland: 2022. A Sea of Microbes: what's So Special about Marine Microbiology. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sunagawa S., Coelho L.P., Chaffron S., Kultima J.R., Labadie K., Salazar G., Djahanschiri B., Zelle G., Mende D.R., Alberti A., Cornejo-Castillo F.M., Costea P.I., Cruaud C., D'ovidio F., Engelen S., Ferrera I., Gasol J.M., Guidi L., Hildebrand F., Kokoszka F., Lepoivre C., Lima-Mendez G., Poulain J., Poulos B.T., Royo-Llonch M., Sarmento H., Vieira-Silva S., Dimier C., Picheral M., Searson S., Kandels-Lewis S., Coordinators T.O., Bowler C., Vargas C.D., Gorsky G., Grimsley N., Hingamp P., Iudicone D., Jaillon O., Not F., Ogata H., Pesant S., Speich S., Stemmann L., Sullivan M.B., Weissenbach J., Wincker P., Karsenti E., Raes J., Acinas S.G., Bork P. Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science. 2015;348 doi: 10.1126/science.1261359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Paoli L., Ruscheweyh H.J., Forneris C.C., Hubrich F., Kautsar S., Bhushan A., Lotti A., Clayssen Q., Salazar G., Milanese A., Carlstrom C.I., Papadopoulou C., Gehrig D., Karasikov M., Mustafa H., Larralde M., Carroll L.M., Sanchez P., Zayed A.A., Cronin D.R., Acinas S.G., Bork P., Bowler C., Delmont T.O., Gasol J.M., Gossert A.D., Kahles A., Sullivan M.B., Wincker P., Zeller G., Robinson S.L., Piel J., Sunagawa S. Biosynthetic potential of the global ocean microbiome. Nature. 2022;607:111–118. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04862-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Medema M.H., de Rond T., Moore B.S. Mining genomes to illuminate the specialized chemistry of life. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2021;22:553–571. doi: 10.1038/s41576-021-00363-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liu Y., Makarova K.S., Huang W.C., Wolf Y.I., Nikolskaya A.N., Zhang X., Cai M., Zhang C.J., Xu W., Luo Z., Cheng L., Koonin E.V., Li M. Expanded diversity of Asgard archaea and their relationships with eukaryotes. Nature. 2021;593:553–557. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03494-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nayfach S., Roux S., Seshadri R., Udwary D., Varghese N., Schulz F., Wu D., Paez-Espino D., Chen I.M., Huntemann M., Palaniappan K., Ladau J., Mukherjee S., Reddy T.B.K., Nielsen T., Kirton E., Faria J.P., Edirisinghe J.N., Henry C.S., Jungbluth S.P., Chivian D., Dehal P., Wood-Charlson E.M., Arkin A.P., Tringe S.G., Visel A., Consortium I.M.D., Woyke T., Mouncey N.J., Ivanova N.N., Kyrpides N.C., Eloe-Fadrosh E.A. A genomic catalog of Earth's microbiomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2021;39:499–509. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0718-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang X., Liu Z., Xu W., Pan J., Huang Y., Cai M., Luo Z., Li M. Genomic insights into versatile lifestyle of three new bacterial candidate phyla. Sci. China Life Sci. 2022;65:1547–1562. doi: 10.1007/s11427-021-2037-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen J., Jia Y., Sun Y., Liu K., Zhou C., Liu C., Li D., Liu G., Zhang C., Yang T., Huang L., Zhuang Y., Wang D., Xu D., Zhong Q., Guo Y., Li A., Seim I., Jiang L., Wang L., Lee S.M.Y., Liu Y., Wang D., Zhang G., Liu S., Wei X., Yue Z., Zheng S., Shen X., Wang S., Qi C., Chen J., Ye C., Zhao F., Wang J., Fan J., Li B., Sun J., Jia X., Xia Z., Zhang H., Liu J., Zheng Y., Liu X., Wang J., Yang H., Kristiansen K., Xu X., Mock T., Li S., Zhang W., Fan G. Global marine microbial diversity and its potential in bioprospecting. Nature. 2024 doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07891-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nishimura Y., Yoshizawa S. The OceanDNA MAG catalog contains over 50,000 prokaryotic genomes originated from various marine environments. Sci. Data. 2022;9:305. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01392-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jiang F., Doudna J.A. CRISPR-Cas9 structures and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2017;46:505–529. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-062215-010822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yoshida S., Hiraga K., Takehana T., Taniguchi I., Yamaji H., Maeda Y., Toyohara K., Miyamoto K., Kimura Y., Oda K. A bacterium that degrades and assimilates poly (ethylene terephthalate) Science. 2016;351:1196–1199. doi: 10.1126/science.aad6359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schmidt T.S.B., Fullam A., Ferretti P., Orakov A., Maistrenko O.M., Ruscheweyh H.J., Letunic I., Duan Y., Van Rossum T., Sunagawa S., Mende D.R., Finn R.D., Kuhn M., Coelho L.P., Bork P. SPIRE: a searchable, planetary-scale mIcrobiome REsource. Nucl. Acid. Res. 2024;52:D777–D783. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Engineering Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Shandong University

RESOURCES