Skip to main content
PLOS Global Public Health logoLink to PLOS Global Public Health
. 2024 Dec 2;4(12):e0003980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003980

A qualitative description of HIV testing and healthcare experiences among trans women in Ghanaian urban slums BSGH-012

Henry Delali Dakpui 1, Osman Wumpini Shamrock 1,2,*, Gloria Aidoo-Frimpong 3,4, Edem Yaw Zigah 1,2, George Rudolph Kofi Agbemedu 1, Abdallah Ahmed 5, Umar Osman 3, Aliyu Haruna 2, Gamji Rabiu Abu-Ba’are 1,2,5,6
Editor: Julia Robinson7
PMCID: PMC11611076  PMID: 39621619

Abstract

Achieving the UNAIDS 90–90–90 targets hinges on identifying and engaging individuals with HIV in care, requiring 90% of those infected to be diagnosed, initiated on ART, and achieving viral suppression. Despite this imperative, HIV testing services as well as research in Ghana often overlook the unique experiences of transgender women in urban slums, impacting their engagement with care. Using the gender affirmative model lens, this study reports the HIV testing experiences of trans women in Ghanaian slums, highlighting how the healthcare environment, counseling, and healthcare provider attitudes shape these experiences. The study used a qualitative descriptive interview design with 20 trans women aged 18 to 31 from urban slums in Greater Accra Metropolitan Area, Ghana. Participants were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling. Data were collected via face-to-face interviews, transcribed, and analyzed using NVivo, with results presented in categories and subcategories. Two main categories emerged from our data analysis: 1) Positive Experiences with HIV Testing, and 2) Negative Experiences with HIV Testing. Positive experiences with HIV testing among trans women in Ghanaian slums included a welcoming environment at healthcare facilities, supportive counseling, and relatability with HIV-positive nurses. Negative experiences were characterized by fear and anxiety during testing, often intensified by healthcare worker attitudes, including unwelcoming behaviors and judgmental body language, especially in facilities that are not key population friendly. These categories provided a framework for understanding the varied experiences of trans women in Ghanaian slums regarding HIV testing. The study highlights the urgent need for Ghanaian slum healthcare facilities to address discrimination against trans women by creating inclusive, supportive environments. It stresses the importance of using a gender-affirmative approach to improve HIV testing and health outcomes for trans women. Policymakers and healthcare providers must focus on training, inclusive care, and cultural competence to reduce health disparities for this population.

Introduction

In low- to middle-income countries, transgender women (TGW) are 77.5 times more likely to have HIV than cisgender women [1]. Ghana, a lower-middle-income country in West Africa, faces a concentrated HIV epidemic among key populations [2]. In 2017, an estimated 28.1% of TGW in Ghana were living with HIV, a prevalence rate exceeding that of all other key populations in the country and far surpassing the national average of 1.7% [3].

While HIV testing has been firmly established as a key and critical step in curbing the epidemic, the existing HIV testing coverage and frequency pose a barrier [411]. In low-and middle-income countries, less than half of people living with HIV are aware of their status [12]. In Ghana, despite a national increase in HIV status awareness from 43% in 2014 to 72% in 2023, key populations, of which TGW are a part, continue to experience low rates of HIV testing due to pervasive stigma and discrimination that permeate various aspects of their lives [3, 7, 8, 1326].

Within the sub-Saharan region of Africa, TGW continue to face severe societal stigmatization, reinforced by both cultural norms and legal structures [27, 28]. Cultural norms in many sub-Saharan African societies often dictate rigid gender roles and expectations, leading to the marginalization of individuals whose gender identity do not conform to the dominant traditional norms [29, 30]. Similar to other African nations, Ghana is deeply religious, which correlates with widespread anti-LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) sentiment [20]. Many Ghanaians perceive non-heteronormative sexual orientations and gender identities as "un-African" or as Western imports, rather than recognizing them as human rights issues [31]. As a result, physical and violent homophobic attacks against LGBT individuals are frequent and often endorsed by the media, as well as religious and political figures [22, 32].

Additionally, legal structures in several sub-Saharan African countries, including Ghana, criminalize same-sex relationships and behaviors, contributing to the reinforcement of stigma against transgender individuals [33, 34]. In Ghana, a recently passed anti-LGBT bill by parliament is pending presidential assent to become law, with significant international and domestic pressure urging the president to reject this discriminatory legislation [35]. The bill, otherwise known as the "Promotion of proper human sexual rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill," imposes prison sentences for identifying as LGBT and forming or funding LGBT groups, with penalties of up to three years for individuals and up to five years for groups [35, 36]. The bill also proposes harsh measures like jail terms of up to 10 years for LGBT advocacy campaigns aimed at children and encourages the public to report LGBT individuals to authorities for action. These legal frameworks not only seemingly perpetuate discrimination but also create barriers to accessing essential healthcare services and support for TGW. The criminalization of homosexuality in Ghana further intensifies societal prejudices and biases against LGBT individuals, including TGW [33, 34].

Moreover, within the Ghanaian context, HIV stigma remains profoundly ingrained and fueled by misconceptions, fear, limited knowledge, and the association of HIV with sin and death [37]. Persons living with HIV often endure rejection, insults, violence, and sometimes denial of health care, resulting in social isolation, restricted healthcare access, and reluctance to seek treatment, ultimately exacerbating the HIV epidemic [37].

In healthcare settings, pervasive stigma and discrimination against TGW in Ghana persist, attributed to factors such as a lack of cultural competence among healthcare workers, absence of LGBTQI-specific training in the healthcare sector, and ingrained societal prejudices [20, 38]. Many healthcare providers in sub-Saharan Africa lack the understanding and sensitivity required to address the unique health needs of TGW, often leading to discriminatory practices or reluctance to provide appropriate care [7, 39]. For instance, research across Kenya, Malawi, and South Africa revealed that nearly half (45.3%) of the men who have sex with men (MSM) and TGW reported at least one healthcare-related stigma experience [40]. In South Africa, transgender individuals encountered stigma while accessing reproductive healthcare, while other transfeminine and gender-diverse women faced discrimination due to their gender identity and expression [41]. They described hostile health services, with unrelated health issues often linked to gender or sexual identity, causing discomfort. In Uganda, TGW experienced various forms of stigma, including police and client violence, workplace and familial discrimination, and a lack of tailored health services [42].

These challenges faced by key populations are exacerbated, especially for those residing in urban areas, particularly within slum communities [14, 43], as residing in these areas, further increases the risk of HIV infection among this population [14, 44]. Urban slums are informal settlement and pose a multitude of social and structural challenges that amplify vulnerability to HIV, which include crowded living conditions, discrimination, poverty, limited HIV knowledge, high rates of transactional sex, and limited healthcare access [45]. Notably, certain slum areas within Ghana’s capital, Accra, such as Agbogboloshie (5%), Okai Koi North (8%), and Madina (7%), report a higher HIV prevalence, averaging 7% compared to the national prevalence of 1.7% [13, 46]. TGW in these areas are likely to have low HIV testing rates due to poor access to services, low HIV risk perception, lower education levels, and poverty [47, 48].

Additionally, in low-resource settings, the impact of stigma on healthcare access is even more pronounced, presenting a significant barrier to service utilization compared to other contexts [49]. Healthcare-related stigma not only leads to avoidance of healthcare services but also adds discomfort and stress, adversely affecting health outcomes [14, 50]. For instance, in Ghana, intersectional stigma and discrimination experienced by key populations not only deters them from seeking healthcare services, resulting in delayed diagnosis and treatment of physical health conditions, but also contributes to increased rates of depression, anxiety, and other mental health issues, as well as social exclusion and isolation [15, 51]. Furthermore, stigma and discrimination experienced by transgender individuals in other low-income settings have been linked to adverse health effects, including depressive symptoms, anxiety, suicidality, substance abuse, condomless sex and increased HIV transmission [52].

Research specifically focused on TGW, especially those living in slum communities, in Ghana is limited, with most studies focusing on gay, bisexual, other men who have sex with men, and female sex workers [14, 15]. This paper seeks to address this knowledge gap by offering a qualitative exploration of HIV testing and care experiences within the context of TGW living in Ghanaian urban slums, which can have significant implications for public health interventions and policy development. Identifying the unique challenges and barriers encountered by TGW can contribute to the design of more inclusive and practical strategies to combat the spread of HIV in this vulnerable population.

Grounded in the gender-affirmative model, this study aims to explore the nuanced landscape of HIV testing experiences among TGW living in Ghanaian slums, emphasizing both the supportive and challenging aspects of their experiences [53]. The gender-affirmative model prioritizes the affirmation of gender identity, empowerment, and the mitigation of stigma and discrimination. By applying this framework, we emphasize both the supportive and challenging aspects of HIV testing for TGW, aiming to understand how these experiences influence their access to healthcare [54]. This framework is particularly relevant to our objective of expanding access to HIV testing services. By understanding the facilitators and barriers TGW face, we aim to provide insights that can help policymakers, healthcare providers, and community organizations design services that are not only more accessible but also more welcoming and affirming of TGW’s identities. The ultimate goal is to ensure that HIV testing services are tailored to meet the specific needs of TGW, thereby improving their healthcare outcomes in Ghanaian slums.

Methods

Research design

We employed a qualitative descriptive interview design to explore HIV testing and healthcare experiences among 20 TGW living in urban slums in the Greater Accra Metropolitan Area of Ghana. This design was selected for its suitability in capturing the complex, nuanced experiences of TGW in urban slums—a population whose voices are seldom heard in traditional research [55].

Sampling and recruitment procedure

Participants were recruited using purposive and snowball sampling techniques, leveraging existing relationships with key populations. Research assistants from our partner community organization, who had established connections within the TGW community, initiated the process. A map of existing slum communities in Accra was used to identify three different slums from which the initial participants were recruited.

Four TGW from these communities were initially identified and recruited. Each of these initial participants then referred additional TGW from their social networks, leading to a snowball effect: the first four referred six, those six referred one each, and another six were subsequently referred. In total, 22 TGW were recruited, but only 20 met the inclusion criteria after completing a prior questionnaire designed to confirm their eligibility. Participants were compensated GHC 200 ($17) to cover transportation costs.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Eligibility criteria for participation required TGW to reside in an urban slum in Accra, self-identify as transgender, be aged 18 or older and have engaged in sexual activity with a male within the past year. Individuals not biologically born male or residing outside urban slum communities in the Greater Accra Metropolitan Area were excluded from the study.

Data collection procedure

Data collection involved face-to-face interviews with TGW participants, and were collected between 30th May 2023 and 30th June 2023. Before the interviews, eligible individuals were provided with information sheets detailing the study and given a choice to sign consent forms, with research assistants offering additional clarification and reminders about consent during the process. All interviews occurred in secure community partner locations, with nine out of 20 conducted in Twi, a local Ghanaian language, and the remainder in English. The sample size of 20 participants was determined to be sufficient for this qualitative study as data saturation was achieved, indicating that no new significant themes was identified after the 15th interview, thus ensuring comprehensive coverage of the experiences within the target population [56].

Nature of questions

To ensure a comprehensive exploration of HIV testing experiences among TGW in urban slums, an interview guide was developed collaboratively with experts in urban slum communities research, healthcare practice, and transgender engagement. The guide included open-ended questions and prompts aimed at eliciting narratives about positive and negative experiences encountered during HIV testing. Sample questions included: When last did you test for HIV in your community? What were your experiences like during your last HIV test? What positive experiences have you had at HIV testing sites in your community? Could you describe any challenges or negative experiences you’ve faced while seeking HIV testing services in your community? In addition to the questions, the guide also included a semi-structured script designed to support the interviewers. This script provided standardized introductory statements, instructions, and closing remarks, ensuring consistency across interviews.

Analytical strategy

Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim by research assistants, with translations from Twi to English undertaken by experienced team members who had previously performed such translations in prior studies [14]. Data analysis was conducted using NVivo, employing a systematic approach to ensure the rigor of the findings. Initially, a team of six research assistants developed a comprehensive codebook, which was refined collaboratively, and the first five transcripts were coded collectively. Subsequently, the remaining transcripts were divided, with two team members independently coding each transcript to ensure inter-coder reliability and capture nuances in the data. Coding comparisons were utilized to maintain consistency and validate decisions, with any discrepancies resolved through team discussions. This iterative process ensured the reliability and validity of the analytical findings. Throughout, diligent efforts were made to de-identify the data during transcription to adhere to ethical guidelines. After careful data comparison in NVivo, key themes representing main patterns and significant findings were identified. All monetary amounts quoted were converted using the prevailing exchange rate at the time of data collection (US$1 = GH₵12).

Ethical approval and informed consent

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Research Subjects Review Board (RSRB) at the University of Rochester University (STUDY00008151) and the Ghana Health Service Ethics Review Committee (GHS-ERC:002/03/23). In addressing the ethical considerations specific to the vulnerable population of TGW in urban slums, our study implemented several protective measures. Recognizing the heightened risks of stigma and discrimination, we ensured that all participant interactions, from recruitment through interviews, were conducted with utmost confidentiality and respect. Inform consent was sort from all participant before data collection commenced. We also employed stringent data de-identification techniques and secure data handling practices to safeguard participant identities. Interviews were held in secure, private locations chosen by participants to ensure their comfort and safety. Additionally, research assistants were specially trained in sensitive communication and handling potentially distressing topics, ensuring that discussions did not exacerbate participants’ vulnerabilities. These measures collectively aimed to uphold the dignity and safety of participants while collecting vital data on their HIV testing experiences.

Results

Description of participants

The participants in our study consisted of 20 TGW with a mean age of 20 years, ranging from 18 to 31. Educational backgrounds varied, with 10 participants having completed secondary education, four with tertiary education, five with primary education, and one without any formal education. All were employed, earning an average monthly income of GH₵830.15 ($69.2), with incomes ranging from GH₵200 ($16.7) to GH₵2003 ($166.91). In terms of religious affiliation, the majority were religious: 15 identified as Christians, four were non-religious, and one practiced Islam. A reflection of the high religiosity in the Ghana [5759]. Regarding sexual behavior, 19 participants reported having exclusively male sexual partners over the past year, and one reported having partners of both sexes. Although the study did not explicitly inquire about HIV status to avoid potential stigma, three participants voluntarily disclosed that they were living with HIV.

Description of categories and subcategories

As shown in Table 1, two main categories emerged: Positive Experiences with HIV Testing, and Negative Experiences with HIV Testing. Under Positive Experiences, subcategories included; Welcoming Environment at healthcare facilities, Counseling and Relatability with HIV-positive nurses, and Inclusive, Informative, and Supportive Counseling. Negative Experiences encompassed Fear and Anxiety in HIV Testing and Negative Health Worker Attitude. These categories provide a framework for understanding the varied experiences of TGW in Ghanaian slums regarding HIV testing.

Table 1. Summary of positive and negative HIV testing experiences reported by trans women in Ghanaian slums.

Category Subcategory Description
Positive Experiences with HIV Testing Welcoming Environment at Healthcare Facilities Participants felt welcomed and cared for by healthcare staff.
Counseling and Relatability with HIV-Positive Nurses Nurses provided personalized counseling, shared their own experiences, and reduced stigma.
Inclusive, Informative, and Supportive Counseling Nurses engaged in comprehensive discussions, covering HIV, PrEP, and safe sexual practices.
Negative Experiences with HIV Testing Fear and Anxiety in HIV Testing Participants experienced fear and anxiety, particularly during delays or multiple retests.
Negative Health Worker Attitude Participants encountered unwelcoming behaviors and judgmental attitudes from healthcare workers.

Positive experiences with HIV testing

Welcoming environment at healthcare facilities

Some participants reported feeling welcomed and cared for by healthcare staff during HIV testing. One participant highlighted the reassuring presence of a nurse who provided counseling while waiting for test results. The nurse’s supportive words, delivered by a white nurse as noted by the participant, significantly alleviated the participant’s anxiety and instilled confidence in managing a potential reactive outcome.

They are so welcoming. They are so nice. Yeah. And they are good too. Like they take time to take care of us. When you go there, they have patience. I met this nurse. She’s White though. And then she was very welcoming. She started counseling with me while my results were pending. I was nervous and scared. But when I walked in, she was like, baby keep calm, relax, there’s nothing to be afraid of. When you’re reactive, there are ways to go by to live as long as you’re supposed to live. And so, like her words actually calm me down and like, I am in for this and I’m okay.

—Participant 6 (23, Christian)

Counseling and relatability with HIV positive nurse

Another participant shared an encounter with a nurse who went beyond standard testing procedure by discussing the importance of medication adherence and a healthy lifestyle. The nurse even disclosed her own HIV-positive status, aiming to reduce stigma and emphasize that with proper care, individuals with HIV can lead fulfilling lives.

Before I began my medications, they conducted the tests again. One of the nurses took me to a different room and told me that for HIV, if you take your medications, it won’t progress. Make sure to take your medications on time, eat healthy, and drink lots of water. This is what will keep you healthy. If you miss your medications or fail to eat well, it can bring your system down. She asked if I would believe her if she told me she had HIV, and I said no. What shows she has HIV? She revealed her status as positive to me, but I didn’t believe it because she looked very fine. She is a very nice woman without any visible signs of HIV. So, when it was time to check the viral load, she did it on herself before and her results were positive. This calmed me down greatly as I realized that if you have HIV, you are not rejected in society because HIV is better than some diseases. As long as you take your medications, no one would know.

—Participant 2 (19, Christian)

Inclusive, informative and supportive counseling

Participants shared experiences where nurses engaged in comprehensive discussions that went beyond the technical aspects of HIV testing. This included education on HIV, PrEP, and safe sexual practices, providing a holistic approach to healthcare

I went there. I met a nurse and then she asked me my sexual orientation, my gender identity, and then she educated me on HIV and PrEP and then told me the outcome… um, whatever was going to come. So, we did the testing and while waiting for the results, she engaged me in conversations about safe sexual relationships. So, the results came and then I was fine.

—Participant 7 (26, Christian)

Another participant shared a positive account of their HIV testing experience at the health facility. The participant expressed that the atmosphere during the HIV test was serene and comfortable. The participant recounted the supportive response they received upon learning of their positive test result. The nurse provided consolation and supportive counseling, establishing a human connection beyond the clinical aspects of the test.

When I went to test for HIV It was serene it was okay the nurse was cool with me, they did not do anything to make me feel like not going there again. because they took me through counseling first, after they counseled me and then like, we had a friendly chat. And then I did the test and after the test came out positive the nurse consoled me, and we still talk because he took my number then he will be checking on me and then when the time is due for me to take my medication, they let me know then I go for it. As for me I see them to open their door for us to come in whilst to get to check our health status without any problem.

—Participant 4 (22, Christian)

Negative experiences with HIV testing

Fear, and anxiety in HIV testing

Fear and anxiety were prevalent among participants, especially when faced with delays or the need for multiple retests. These encounters led them to speculate about receiving a positive diagnosis, intensifying their apprehension.

I was very terrified. We were there, they took the test and my result wasn’t coming. It was delayed and they said I had to redo the test. They did it and they were like they were not getting the result, so I had to do it again for the third time and at that point, I was scared the test was positive, and the health workers didn’t want to tell me the truth. At that point, I was like, okay, let me accept the fact that I am positive till the result came out that they wanted to confirm because the first one wasn’t successful, the second one was negative and they wanted to confirm it was negative so that is why they did the third one.

—Participant 3 (18, Christian)

Participants also cited the influence of witnessing others’ emotional reactions to positive diagnoses as a source of communal anxiety. This communal anxiety heightened their own apprehension about undergoing testing, as expressed by another participant.

My experience was with the people around. Some were scared of being tested. I was also scared of being tested. Because you know, when someone has it, they come out and then cry. It’s very sad, but you can’t do anything about it, it has happened. So, all you need is to console the person and say something sensible to the person so that the person will be okay.

—Participant 1 (26, Christian)

Additionally, participants pointed out that interactions with healthcare providers, including intrusive questioning, often contributed to the fear and apprehension they felt during the testing process.

In the health facilities, sometimes they put fear in you. The nurses put fear in you. Like, ask you what have you been doing and all that. So, when the test is run, sometimes you sit down to think about the people you have sex with, looking at their bodies and wondering if they might be having HIV

—Participant 8 (31, Christian)

Negative health worker attitude

Participants highlighted instances of encountering negative attitudes from healthcare staff, especially in facilities that were less inclusive of key populations. Trans women often felt unwelcome due to their feminine appearance, encountering unwelcoming behaviors such as awkward stares and negative body language. In these unwelcoming hospitals, nurses would sometimes gossip and judge them, leading to a hostile environment.

Mostly when I visit a health facility which is not key population oriented for testing, the workers there make you feel like you shouldn’t be attended to because of the way you appear looking feminine. Sometimes too, their body language, you know, when you are at the facility, they can look at you from top to bottom. Without saying anything, their body language is speaking to you negatively.

—Participant 12 (24, Christian)

Despite the usual process of receiving care in the Outpatient Department, these participants had to assert themselves to be attended to.

There was an instance when I went to the hospital that was not key population friendly for testing, and all of a sudden, everyone was looking at me, because of the way I dressed. Everyone was looking. The nurses started gossiping. I sat there for about one hour until I approach them to tell them why I was there. But on a normal basis, you know, you go through the Out Patient Department, and a nurses will attend to you. In my case no one wanted to attend to me due to how I looked and identified myself. I had to approach them before I was attended to.

—Participant 10 (25, Muslim).

Discussion

The findings of this study offer valuable insights into the experiences of TGW in Ghanaian slums regarding HIV testing, contextualized within the gender-affirmative model [54]. Our findings resonate with the principles of the gender-affirmative model, emphasizing the significance of the healthcare environment, counseling, and healthcare provider attitudes in shaping the HIV testing experiences of TGW.

Consistent with existing literature and the principles of the gender-affirmative model, which emphasizes affirmation of gender identity, empowerment, and mitigation of stigma and discrimination, our findings highlight the importance of creating a welcoming environment within healthcare settings [54, 60, 61]. A welcoming environment serves as a practical application of these principles by affirming and validating the gender identities of TGW, alleviating anxiety, building confidence, and fostering trust during the HIV testing process, thereby encouraging regular healthcare engagement, which is essential for continuous HIV prevention and treatment [62, 63]. The presence of supportive and empathetic healthcare providers, as mentioned by some TGW in this study has also been shown to foster trust and encourage individuals to seek HIV testing, thereby promoting HIV prevention and care [62, 64].

The significance of counseling and peer support in healthcare settings has been widely recognized in the literature as a key factor in enhancing the HIV testing experiences of TGW and MSM [65]. Our findings corroborate this, emphasizing the importance of counseling and relatability in reducing stigma, providing emotional support, and promoting positive health outcomes. Sharing personal experiences, as demonstrated by the HIV-positive nurse in our study, can be a valuable strategy for reducing the social stigma surrounding HIV and promoting medication adherence and healthy lifestyle choices among people living with HIV. By integrating counseling and peer support within a gender-affirmative framework, healthcare providers can create a supportive and affirming environment that addresses the unique needs and challenges faced by TGW in the context of HIV testing and care. This approach not only enhances the accessibility and acceptability of HIV testing services but also contributes to improving health outcomes and reducing health disparities among this population.

Our findings further highlight the value of inclusive, informative, and supportive counseling in creating a positive healthcare experience among TGW in Ghanaian slums. By fostering an environment that prioritizes affirmation of gender identity, empowerment, and the mitigation of stigma and discrimination, healthcare providers who engage in comprehensive discussions about sexual orientation, gender identity, and provide education on HIV and PrEP contribute to a more positive and empowering HIV testing experience for TGW [66, 67]. This approach creates trust, builds rapport, and encourages open communication, promoting improved health outcomes and reducing health disparities in this population [54]. In contrast to studies conducted in other parts of Africa, where TGW often face significant barriers and negative experiences in healthcare settings, our findings suggest that a supportive and affirming approach can lead to more positive experiences [68].

In this study, we also found that fear and anxiety during HIV testing process, negative attitudes, and discriminatory practices of nurses were prevalent factors characterizing the negative experiences of TGW in Ghanaian slums. Fear and anxiety during the HIV testing process, as reported by the participants in our study, have been identified in previous research as common experiences across various populations and found to be significant barriers to HIV testing [68, 69]. These findings underscore the need for healthcare facilities to improve their testing procedures and communication strategies to minimize anxiety and fear. Effective communication, transparency about the testing process, and timely delivery of results are essential to alleviate anxiety and promote a more positive testing experience [69].

Furthermore, negative attitudes and discriminatory practices within healthcare settings have been consistently reported by TGW and are considered a significant barrier to accessing healthcare services, including HIV testing, among TGW [70, 71]. These negative experiences can lead to avoidance of healthcare services, delayed HIV testing, and reduced engagement in HIV care, which ultimately contribute to health disparities and poorer health outcomes among TGW [71, 72]. In line with the gender affirmative model, these findings highlight the urgent need for healthcare facilities to address and eliminate discriminatory practices and attitudes toward TGW [54]. Healthcare providers must receive comprehensive training on key population health issues, cultural competence, and respectful communication to ensure equitable and inclusive care and promote a more positive and welcoming healthcare experience for TGW.

Notably, participants in our study reported experiencing negative attitudes and discrimination specifically within non-key population (KP) inclusive facilities. These findings suggest that the type of facility—whether it is KP-inclusive or not—can significantly influence the quality of care received. KP-friendly healthcare facilities are extremely limited in Ghana and mostly private owned. Private facilities like the West Africa AIDS Foundation (WAAF) and the International Health Clinic Center (IHCC) have been recognized for their KP-inclusive approaches, which contrast sharply with the negative experiences reported in more general healthcare settings [73]. These facilities provide a model of care that could be emulated by public healthcare facilities across Ghana to improve the inclusivity and quality of care for not just TGW but key population in general [73].

Furthermore, the advent of HIV self-testing (HIVST) and its introduction in Ghana presents a promising solution for addressing some of the barriers identified [74]. HIVST allows individuals to perform an HIV test in the privacy of their own homes, reducing the immediate need to engage with potentially discriminatory healthcare settings [75]. This approach can help mitigate the impact of negative attitudes and discriminatory practices by offering a less stigmatizing and more confidential testing option. HIVST can empower TGW by providing them with greater control over their testing experience and reducing the reliance on healthcare settings where they might face stigma. By improving access to testing while avoiding direct interaction with healthcare staff who may hold negative attitudes, HIVST aligns with the principles of the gender-affirmative model by enhancing empowerment and reducing stigma [59]. Additionally, as awareness and accessibility of HIVST increase, it could encourage more TGW to seek testing and engage with healthcare services, ultimately leading to better health outcomes and reduced health disparities.

Strengths and limitations

This study notably contributes to the field by focusing on the often-underrepresented HIV testing experiences of TGW in urban slums within Ghana, employing the gender-affirmative model to validate and respect gender identities. The qualitative interview approach allowed for an in-depth exploration of the personal and social nuances associated with HIV testing, which quantitative methods might fail to capture. Additionally, the collaboration with local community organizations not only facilitated access to this hard-to-reach population but also ensured that our methodology was culturally sensitive and tailored to the specific needs of the participants. However, the study has limitations. It does not fully explore the intersectional factors such as ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education level that might influence HIV testing experiences and outcomes. To address this, we acknowledge these gaps and recommend them as focal points for future research, and we have initiated discussions with community partners to integrate some of these considerations in ongoing programs. The geographical scope is also limited to the Greater Accra Metropolitan Area, which may restrict the generalizability of the findings. Future research should aim to include other regions to enhance the breadth of data and applicability of the findings. Additionally, the use of snowball sampling and a relatively small sample size may introduce selection bias and limit the diversity within the sample. Despite these potential biases, we utilized rigorous qualitative methods to ensure the reliability of our findings and plan to employ more diverse sampling techniques in future studies to improve the representativeness of the sample.

Conclusion

This study contributes to the literature on the HIV testing experiences of TGW in Ghanaian slums and highlights the need for healthcare facilities to address discriminatory practices and attitudes towards TGW and create a welcoming and affirming environment within healthcare settings to enhance HIV testing experiences and promote improved health outcomes and reduced health disparities in this population. Enhancing the accessibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of HIV testing services for TGW in Ghanaian slums requires a multifaceted approach that integrates the principles of the gender-affirmative model. These approaches include comprehensive training for healthcare providers, the creation of inclusive and affirming healthcare environments, and the provision of culturally competent, respectful care that addresses the unique needs and challenges faced by TGW. By adopting these strategies, policymakers, healthcare providers, and community organizations can contribute to reducing health disparities and improving the overall wellbeing of TGW in Ghanaian slums.

Supporting information

S1 Data. Dataset of participant responses in the study on HIV testing experiences among transgender women in Ghanaian urban slums.

This dataset includes anonymized data on positive and negative experiences, healthcare interactions, and demographic details, collected during face-to-face interviews.

(DOCX)

pgph.0003980.s001.docx (17.4KB, docx)

Data Availability

All data can be found in the manuscript and Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Baral SD, Poteat T, Strömdahl S, Wirtz AL, Guadamuz TE, Beyrer C. Worldwide burden of HIV in transgender women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2013;13(3). doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70315-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ali H, Amoyaw F, Baden D, Durand L, Bronson M, Kim A, et al. Ghana’s HIV epidemic and PEPFAR’s contribution towards epidemic control. Ghana Medical Journal. 2019;53(1):59-. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v53i1.9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ghana Aids C. Ghana men’s study II 2017: Mapping and population size estimation (MPSE) and integrated bio-behavioral surveillance survey (IBBSS) amongst men who have sex with men (MSM) in Ghana (Round II). Accra: 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pan African Health O. PAHO urges testing as the first step towards preventing HIV and halting the AIDS epidemic. https://wwwpahoorg/en/news/30-11-2018-paho-urges-testing-first-step-towards-preventing-hiv-and-halting-aids-epidemic2018.
  • 5.Boyd DT, Martinez O, Mammadli T, Shamrock OW, Abu-Ba’are GR, Dyer TV. Intersecting Epidemics: Examining the Impact of Internalized Homophobia and Depression Symptoms on HIV Testing Through a Suicide Syndemic Among Young Black Men Who Have Sex with Men. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. 2024. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02225-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nyblade L, Stockton MA, Saalim K, Rabiu Abu-Ba’are G, Clay S, Chonta M, et al. Using a mixed-methods approach to adapt an HIV stigma reduction to address intersectional stigma faced by men who have sex with men in Ghana. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2022;25(S1). doi: 10.1002/JIA2.25908/FULL [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Abubakari GMR, Owusu-Dampare F, Ogunbajo A, Gyasi J, Adu M, Appiah P, et al. HIV Education, Empathy, and Empowerment (HIVE3): A Peer Support Intervention for Reducing Intersectional Stigma as a Barrier to HIV Testing among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Ghana. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(24):13103-. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Abubakari GMR, Turner DA, Ni Z, Conserve DF, Dada D, Otchere A, et al. Community-Based Interventions as Opportunities to Increase HIV Self-Testing and Linkage to Care Among Men Who Have Sex With Men–Lessons From Ghana, West Africa. Frontiers in Public Health. 2021;9. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.660256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Girault P, Green K, Clement NF, Rahman YAA, Adams B, Wambugu S. Piloting a Social Networks Strategy to Increase HIV Testing and Counseling Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Greater Accra and Ashanti Region, Ghana. AIDS and Behavior. 2015;19(11). doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1069-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gyamerah AO, Taylor KD, Atuahene K, Anarfi JK, Fletcher M, Raymond HF, et al. Stigma, discrimination, violence, and HIV testing among men who have sex with men in four major cities in Ghana. AIDS Care. 2020;32(8):1036–44. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2020.1757020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Parker W, Schubert J, Owusu-Ansah S, Asante-Afari K, Edem Assisi S, Adiku ED, et al. Addressing community-level stigma toward key populations: communication insights from action research in Ghana. African Journal of AIDS Research. 2020;19(2). doi: 10.2989/16085906.2020.1743727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Marsh K, Eaton JW, Mahy M, Sabin K, Autenrieth CS, Wanyeki I, et al. Global, regional and country-level 90-90-90 estimates for 2018: Assessing progress towards the 2020 target. AIDS. 2019;33. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ghana AC. Ghana AIDS Commission (2016). National HIV/AIDS strategic plan (2016–2020).http://www.ghanaids.gov.gh/gac1/pubs/COMPREHENSIVE%20NSP%202016-2020.pdf [Ref list]. 2016.
  • 14.Zigah EY, Abu-Ba’are GR, Shamrock OW, Dakpui HD, Apreku A, Boyd DT, et al. “For my safety and wellbeing, I always travel to seek health care in a distant facility”—the role of place and stigma in HIV testing decisions among GBMSM–BSGH 002. Health & Place. 2023;83:103076-. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shamrock OW, Abu-Ba’are GR, Zigah EY, Dakpui HD, Adjaka G, LeBlanc NM, et al. Community stigma, victimization, and coping strategies among gay, bisexual, and other cis-gender men who have sex with men in slum communities in Ghana. BSGH-003. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):966-. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18242-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Abu-Ba’are GR, Shamrock OW, Apreku A, Agbemedu GRK, Zigah EY, Ezechi OC, et al. Awareness and Willingness to use Condoms and Preexposure Prophylaxis among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Cisgendered Men who Have sex with men in Slum Communities in Ghana. BSGH-004. Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC). 2023;22:23259582231209649-. doi: 10.1177/23259582231209649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Abu-Ba’are GR, Shamrock OW, Zigah EY, Ogunbajo A, Dakpui HD, Agbemedu GRK, et al. Qualitative description of interpersonal HIV stigma and motivations for HIV testing among gays, bisexuals, and men who have sex with men in Ghana’s slums—BSGH-005. PLOS ONE. 2024;19(6):e0289905–e. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289905 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Abu-Ba’are GR, Torpey K, Guure C, Nelson LE, Jeon S, McMahon J, et al. Status-neutral community-based multilevel intervention to address intersectional stigma and discrimination, and increase HIV testing, PrEP, and ART uptake among YGBMSM in Ghanaian Slums: A clustered randomized control trial protocol. 2024.
  • 19.Abu-Ba’are GR, Torpey K, Nelson L, Conserve D, Jeon S, McMahon J, et al. Adaptation and feasibility of Many Men Many Voices (3MV), an HIV prevention intervention to reduce intersectional stigma and increase HIVST among YSMM residing in Ghanaian slums–A clustered pre-post pilot trial protocol. 2024. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4313437/v1. [DOI]
  • 20.Osman Wumpini S, Henry Delali D, George Rudolph Kofi A, Donte TB, Kharul I, Ibrahim Wunpini M, et al. “I’m scared of the nurses telling other people I am a transwoman”: Disclosure and nondisclosure of gender identity among trans women in Ghana’s urban slums–BSGH010. 2024.
  • 21.Shamrock OW, Guure C, Reeves J, Ni Z, Turner D, Haruna A, et al. A qualitative study of the ecology of stigma experiences-An application of the ecological model to stigma experiences of trans-women from Ghana. BSGH019. 2024. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4945585/v1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kushwaha S, Lalani Y, Maina G, Ogunbajo A, Wilton L, Agyarko-Poku T, et al. "but the moment they find out that you are MSM ": a qualitative investigation of HIV prevention experiences among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Ghana’s health care system. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1). doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4799-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Abubakari GMR, Turner D, Nelson LE, Odhiambo AJ, Boakye F, Manu A, et al. An application of the ADAPT-ITT model to an evidence-based behavioral HIV prevention intervention for men who have sex with men in Ghana. International Health Trends and Perspectives. 2021;1(1). doi: 10.32920/ihtp.v1i1.1412 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nelson LRE, Nyblade L, Torpey K, Logie CH, Qian HZ, Manu A, et al. Multi-level intersectional stigma reduction intervention to increase HIV testing among men who have sex with men in Ghana: Protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(11 November). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Leblanc NM, Andes KL. An Exploration of Men’s Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions of HIV, HIV Risk, and Willingness to Test for HIV in Yendi District, Northern Ghana. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care. 2015;26(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2014.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Abu-Ba’are GR, Shamrock OW, Agbemedu GRK, Dakpui HD. "How will I know the results if I self-test at home?"–At-home HIV self-testing vs. at-clinic HIV testing preference among trans-women in Ghana’s Slums. BSGH-015. 2024.
  • 27.Mehta SD, Otieno FO, Kimani J, Wahome E, Okal D, Roy A, et al. Transgender women in Kenya experience greater stigma, depressive symptoms, alcohol and drug use and risky sexual practices than cis-gendered men who have sex with men. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1). doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16348-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shabalala SB, Campbell MM. The complexities of trans women’s access to healthcare in South Africa: moving health systems beyond the gender binary towards gender equity. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2023;22(1). doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02039-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Muwanguzi PA, Otiku PK, Nabunya R, Gausi B. Implementation and effectiveness of transgender stigma reduction interventions in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review. Journal of Global Health Reports. 2023;7. doi: 10.29392/001c.72080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Banks W. Queering Ghana: sexuality, community, and the struggle for cultural belonging in an African nation. Wayne State University Dissertations2013.
  • 31.Dulani B, Sambo G, Dionne KY. Good neighbours? Africans express high levels of tolerance for many, but not for all. 2016.
  • 32.Odoi A. Homophobic Violence in Ghana: When and Where It Counts. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. 2022;19(4). doi: 10.1007/s13178-021-00655-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Government of G. Criminal Code. https://home.gis.gov.gh/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Criminal-Offences-Act-1960-Act-29.pdf; 1960.
  • 34.Lyons CE, Twahirwa Rwema JO, Makofane K, Diouf D, Mfochive Njindam I, Ba I, et al. Associations between punitive policies and legal barriers to consensual same-sex sexual acts and HIV among gay men and other men who have sex with men in sub-Saharan Africa: a multicountry, respondent-driven sampling survey. The Lancet HIV. 2023;10(3). doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00336-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Coleman TE, Ako EY, Kyeremateng JG. A human rights critique of Ghana’s Anti-LGBTIQ+ Bill of 2021. African Human Rights Law Journal. 2023;23(1). doi: 10.17159/1996-2096/2023/v23n1a5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Avagah R. Analysis of the Anti Gay Bill Captioned ’The Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill’ in Light of Kwame Nkrumah’s Philosophical Consciencism–LGQBTI Versus the African (Ghanaian) Culture. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2023.
  • 37.Armstrong-Mensah E, Ofori E, Alema-Mensah E, Agyarko-Poku T. HIV destigmatization: perspectives of people living with HIV in the Kumasi Metropolis in Ghana. Frontiers in Reproductive Health. 2023;5. doi: 10.3389/frph.2023.1169216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gyamerah AO, Kinzer E, Aidoo-Frimpong G, Sorensen G, Mensah MD, Taylor KD, et al. PrEP knowledge, acceptability, and implementation in Ghana: Perspectives of HIV service providers and MSM, trans women, and gender diverse individuals living with HIV. PLOS Global Public Health. 2023;3(6). doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.James P, Hayfron-Benjamine A, Abdulai M, Lasim O, Yvonne N, Obiri-Yeboah D. Predictors of HIV stigma among health workers in the cape coast metropolis, Ghana. Journal of Public Health in Africa. 2020;11(1). doi: 10.4081/jphia.2020.1020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mbeda C, Ogendo A, Lando R, Schnabel D, Gust DA, Guo X, et al. Healthcare-related stigma among men who have sex with men and transgender women in sub-Saharan Africa participating in HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 075 study. AIDS Care—Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV. 2020;32(8). doi: 10.1080/09540121.2020.1776824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Luvuno ZPB, Ncama B, McHunu G. Transgender population’s experiences with regard to accessing reproductive health care in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa: A qualitative study. African Journal of Primary Health Care and Family Medicine. 2019;11(1). doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v11i1.1933 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ssekamatte T, Isunju JB, Naume M, Buregyeya E, Mugambe RK, Wanyenze RK, Bukenya JN. Barriers to access and utilisation of HIV/STIs prevention and care services among trans-women sex workers in the greater Kampala metropolitan area, Uganda. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2020;20(1). doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05649-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shamrock Osman W, Abu-Ba’are GRANDZEYANDAAANDAGRKAND. Family rejection of non-hetero sexuality–Sexual orientation and behavior anonymity among sexual minority men in slum communities-BSGH 001. PLOS Global Public Health. 2023;3(12):1–18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Madise N J., Ziraba AK, Inungu J, Khamadi SA, Ezeh A, Zulu EM, et al. Are slum dwellers at heightened risk of HIV infection than other urban residents? Evidence from population-based HIV prevalence surveys in Kenya. Health and Place. 2012;18(5). doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.04.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jennings L, Mathai M, Linnemayr S, Trujillo A, Mak’anyengo M, Montgomery BEE, Kerrigan DL. Economic Context and HIV Vulnerability in Adolescents and Young Adults Living in Urban Slums in Kenya: A Qualitative Analysis Based on Scarcity Theory. AIDS and Behavior. 2017;21(9). doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1676-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cassels S, Jenness SM, Biney AAE, Ampofo WK, Nii-Amoo Dodoo F. Migration, sexual networks, and HIV in Agbogbloshie, Ghana. Demographic Research. 2014;31(1). doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.28 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kaibarta S, Mandal S, Mandal P, Bhattacharya S, Paul S. Multidimensional poverty in slums: an empirical study from urban India. GeoJournal. 2022;87. doi: 10.1007/s10708-021-10571-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Owusu-Ansah FE, Tagbor H, Togbe MA. Access to health in city slum dwellers: The case of Sodom and Gomorrah in Accra, Ghana. African Journal of Primary Health Care and Family Medicine. 2016;8(1). doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v8i1.822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mekonen T, Chan GCK, Belete T, Menberu M, Davidson L, Hides L, Leung J. Mental health service utilization in a low resource setting: A qualitative study on perspectives of health professionals in Northwest Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(11 November). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shamrock OW, Dakpui HD, Agbemedu GRK, Boyd DT, Islam K, Mashoud IW, et al. “I’m scared of the nurses telling other people I am a transwoman”: Disclosure and nondisclosure of gender identity among trans women in Ghana’s urban slums–BSGH010. 2024.
  • 51.Abu-Ba’are GR, Aidoo-Frimpong G, Stockton M, Zigah EY, Amuah S, Amu-Adu P, et al. "I told myself, be bold and go and test": Motivators and barriers to HIV testing among gay, bisexual, and other cis-gender men who have sex with men in Ghana ‒ West Africa. PLOS Global Public Health. 2024;4(1):e0002231–e. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lin Y, Xie H, Huang Z, Zhang Q, Wilson A, Hou J, et al. The mental health of transgender and gender non-conforming people in China: a systematic review. The Lancet Public Health. 2021;6(12):e954–e69. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00236-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Edwards-Leeper L, Leibowitz S, Sangganjanavanich VF. Affirmative practice with transgender and gender nonconforming youth: Expanding the model. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity. 2016;3(2). doi: 10.1037/sgd0000167 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sevelius J, Chakravarty D, Neilands TB, Keatley JA, Shade SB, Johnson MO, Rebchook G. Evidence for the Model of Gender Affirmation: The Role of Gender Affirmation and Healthcare Empowerment in Viral Suppression Among Transgender Women of Color Living with HIV. AIDS and Behavior. 2021;25. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02544-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. part 1: Introduction. European Journal of General Practice. 2017;23(1). doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality and Quantity. 2018;52(4). doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Shamrock OW. Disability, Religion and Work among Vulnerable Populations: An Inquiry of Women Experiences and Perspectives. 2022.
  • 58.Adua JY. Religion and Homosexuality in Ghana: Assessing the Factors Constraining the Legalisation of Homosexuality in Ghana: A Study of the Klottey Korle Sub-Metropolitan Area. of Accra. 2018.
  • 59.Religion Tweneboah S. International Human Rights Standards, and the Politicisation of Homosexuality in Ghana. African Journal of gender and religion. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF GENDER AND RELIGION. 2018;24(2). doi: 10.14426/ajgr.v24i2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Keo-Meier CE, Ehrensaft DE. Introduction to the gender affirmative model. The gender affirmative model: An interdisciplinary approach to supporting transgender and gender expansive children2018.
  • 61.Fauk NK, Hawke K, Mwanri L, Ward PR. Stigma and discrimination towards people living with hiv in the context of families, communities, and healthcare settings: A qualitative study in indonesia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(10). doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kwame A, Petrucka PM. A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: barriers, facilitators, and the way forward. BMC Nursing2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 63.Fauk NK, Merry MS, Putra S, Sigilipoe MA, Crutzen R, Mwanri L. Perceptions among transgender women of factors associated with the access to HIV/ AIDS-related health services in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Gu J, Lau JTF, Wang Z, Wu AMS, Tan X. Perceived empathy of service providers mediates the association between perceived discrimination and behavioral intention to take up HIV antibody testing again among men who have sex with men. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(2). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Chen S, Fang Y, Shing-Fong Chan P, Kawuki J, Mo P, Wang Z. Counseling Supporting HIV Self-Testing and Linkage to Care Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 66.McAuliffe M, Baker D, D’Aoust R. Improving healthcare quality for transgender patients in the perioperative setting: The patient’s perspective. Journal of Perioperative Practice. 2023;33(6). doi: 10.1177/17504589221133937 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bass B, Nagy H. Cultural Competence in the Care of LGBTQ Patients2021. [PubMed]
  • 68.Jessani A, Berry-Moreau T, Parmar R, Athanasakos A, Prodger JL, Mujugira A. Healthcare access and barriers to utilization among transgender and gender diverse people in Africa: a systematic review. BMC Global and Public Health. 2024;2(1):44-. doi: 10.1186/s44263-024-00073-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kobrak P, Remien RH, Myers JE, Salcuni P, Edelstein Z, Tsoi B, Sandfort T. Motivations and Barriers to Routine HIV Testing Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in New York City. AIDS and Behavior. 2022;26(11). doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03679-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Clark KD, Lunn MR, Bosse JD, Sevelius JM, Dawson-Rose C, Weiss SJ, et al. Societal stigma and mistreatment in healthcare among gender minority people: a cross-sectional study. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2023;22(1). doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01975-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Skuban-Eiseler T, Orzechowski M, Steger F. Why do transgender individuals experience discrimination in healthcare and thereby limited access to healthcare? An interview study exploring the perspective of German transgender individuals. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2023;22(1). doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02023-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Boonyapisomparn N, Manojai N, Srikummoon P, Bunyatisai W, Traisathit P, Homkham N. Healthcare discrimination and factors associated with gender-affirming healthcare avoidance by transgender women and transgender men in Thailand: findings from a cross-sectional online-survey study. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2023;22(1). doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01843-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Karolina Linton W. Strategies for Addressing HIV/AIDS Stigma within a Humanitarian Context: A Case Study of the West Africa AIDS Foundation and International Health Care Centers work in Ghana. Stockholm, Sweden2024.
  • 74.Ghana Health Services National ASTICP. HIV testing implementation guide. Accra: 2022.
  • 75.Abubakari GMR, Nelson LRE, Ogunbajo A, Boakye F, Appiah P, Odhiambo A, et al. Implementation and evaluation of a culturally grounded group-based HIV prevention programme for men who have sex with men in Ghana. Global Public Health. 2021;16(7). doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1832555 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003980.r001

Decision Letter 0

Marianne Clemence

19 Aug 2024

PGPH-D-24-01260

A qualitative description of HIV testing and healthcare experiences among trans women in Ghanaian urban slums BSGH-011

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr. Shamrock,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Your submission has been assessed by two reviewers, and their comments are available below. The main requests are to provide additional information about the study setting and the gender-affirmative model, as well as to enhance the Methods and Results reporting, particularly with respect to details of recruitment. Could you please also be sure to provide a copy of the interview guide?

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 30 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Marianne Clemence

Staff Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

1. Please include a complete copy of PLOS’ questionnaire on inclusivity in global research in your revised manuscript. Our policy for research in this area aims to improve transparency in the reporting of research performed outside of researchers’ own country or community. The policy applies to researchers who have travelled to a different country to conduct research, research with Indigenous populations or their lands, and research on cultural artefacts. The questionnaire can also be requested at the journal’s discretion for any other submissions, even if these conditions are not met.  Please find more information on the policy and a link to download a blank copy of the questionnaire here: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/s/best-practices-in-research-reporting. Please upload a completed version of your questionnaire as Supporting Information when you resubmit your manuscript.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Review

PLOS Global Public Health - A qualitative description of HIV testing and healthcare experiences among trans women in Ghanaian urban slums BSGH-011

The study addresses a very important topic for public health, since identifying barriers to accessing HIV testing among trans women can contribute to reducing the high prevalence of HIV found in this population. However, I forward some suggestions for its improvement, with a view to future publication.

Minor issues

• The version that was submitted still had some edits to the text marked by the word change control. As this is the first submission, this should not have happened, as it could confuse the reviewer.

• To distinguish the titles of each section from the subtitles, I suggest that they be presented in capital letters in bold (INTRODUCTION, METHODS, RESULTS, DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION) and the subtitles remain in lower case letters in bold. Or, leave the subtitles in italics and without bold. I recommend checking whether the magazine's instructions have specific guidance regarding this. Otherwise, check the articles already published in this magazine to see how the titles and subtitles of each section are presented.

• I suggest including the term ‘transgender women’ in the first paragraph of the introduction, along with the acronym (TGW). This acronym only appears on page 2 (third paragraph). If you prefer not to use an acronym, I suggest standardizing the term ‘trans women’ throughout the manuscript.

• The same suggestion applies to the acronym LGBT – spell it out the first time it appears and standardize the same acronym throughout the text. It currently appears in two forms: LBGT | LGBTQ+.

• Men who have sex with men appears in full in the Discussion when an acronym for this term (MSM) has already been included in previous sections.

INTRODUCTION

It is well described and linked, however, to make the scenario related to the study population in Ghana more evident to the reader, it would be interesting to inform:

• Is there demographic data on the number of trans people living in the country?

• Are there more up-to-date epidemiological data to insert to replace reference number 2, which is from 2019? Is there a notification system to register new HIV cases, according to gender identity? Does the Ghanaian Ministry of Health prepare and make available epidemiological bulletins on HIV, which include the trans population?

• How are health services distributed in Ghana? Are they public or proven? In what type of health service is it possible to carry out an HIV test in the country? Is there a specific network of services to provide Comprehensive Health for Trans People? Are these services characterized by being trans-friendly based on any specific training of health professionals? ‘Not trans-friendly’ health services are mentioned – what criteria are used for this definition?

• As for the subtitle 'Theoretical framework', I think it could be removed, however when mentioning the gender-affirmative model, it would be interesting to provide more information about it and how its principles connect with the objective of expanding the search for health services for testing of HIV.

METHODS

• Research design – I suggest inserting the bibliographic reference on qualitative research.

• Sampling and Recruitment procedure – the use of the snowball sampling approach was mentioned. It is necessary to better explain how this technique was applied in practice. Was a map of existing slums in Accra used? Were participants from different favelas or just one? Was there already a previous connection between them and the researchers? Was a prior questionnaire administered to confirm the eligibility criteria? Inform whether the participants received financial compensation to cover transportation and food costs and what was the amount?

• Data collection procedure – insert bibliographic references when mentioning the saturation issue to define the number of participants.

• Nature of questions - Inform the content of the Guide prepared and whether there was a script to support the interviewers and which questions made up this script, in addition to the examples cited.

• Analytical strategy – explain more about the ‘meticulous approach’ and insert bibliographic references.

RESULTS

• The findings are very interesting and their description would benefit if an additional synthetic table was presented with the identified categories and subcategories.

• The first paragraph of the subitems Positive and Negative - Experiences with HIV Testing are unnecessary, as they are already included in the Description of Categories and Subcategories.

• In relation to the three people who already had HIV, it would be important to know how long ago they became aware of their status, as the quality of care in the health services used may have changed during this period. In this sense, would it be appropriate to address issues relating to access barriers and quality of care separately for these participants? I suggest saying something about it in the Discussion section.

• When presenting excerpts of the speeches, it is not necessary to identify each of them as trans women, as this does not distinguish them. Only one was identified as a ‘Muslim’, wouldn’t that make her identification easier? There are also two Christian participants aged 26, they are also indistinguishable. It would be necessary to create another form of identification.

DISCUSSION

The main findings were discussed in light of the literature and compared with the results of other research. Many points of similarity were found. There are some results that emerged in contrast to the literature. If so, it would be important to highlight it as an additional contribution of this study.

However, I missed discussing these data considering the reality of health services in terms of management. Are there government initiatives that are already underway and that involve health services? Are there government publications that explain what has been planned or is already underway to reduce the problems identified?

Every time the gender affirmation model is cited, its respective reference must be inserted. It would also be necessary to insert bibliographic references in the fourth paragraph (open communication).

Strengths and Limitations – should come before the Conclusion section

Reviewer #2: This is a well-written paper about barriers and facilitators to HIV testing among transgender women who reside in slums in the greater Accra area. The paper is interesting and informative, and I appreciate the opportunity to review it. I have only a few recommendations for improvement:

The Introduction is very comprehensive and well-written. The authors may wish to include somewhere in the introduction or in the results a Figure depicting the gender affirmative model and how it was used to guide the theoretical framework for this paper. It could be a good addition for readers to have a visual of how each facilitator and barrier identified fit into this model, if you agree this makes sense.

On page 9, it seems there is a quote missing or some editing that needs to happen as the sentence ends with “states.” For both the sections on Inclusive, Informative and Supportive Counseling and the section on Fear and Anxiety, it would be useful to break up the descriptive paragraphs and put each sentence before the corresponding quote. I think this would make the sections read more smoothly.

The main addition that could greatly improve the paper is if the authors included more information about the testing sites (not sure if this information was gathered, but if so, it would be very useful). For example, at testing sites where participants had positive experiences, was there anything they had in common contrasted with those where participants had negative experiences? One participant makes reference to the different care she received at an Outpatient unit. I am wondering if people go to a local community testing center versus a larger hospital, etc if the care they receive is different. This could also inform policies and guidelines for testing based on type of facility.

Finally, I wonder about the availability of self-testing in Ghana. Is it available at all? If so, could that be another option for those who describe that the atmosphere of testing sites and witnessing others get their results increases fear and anxiety?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Katia Cristina Bassichetto

Reviewer #2: Yes: Rebecca Giguere

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003980.r003

Decision Letter 1

Julia Robinson

7 Nov 2024

A qualitative description of HIV testing and healthcare experiences among trans women in Ghanaian urban slums BSGH-012

PGPH-D-24-01260R1

Dear Dr Shamrock,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'A qualitative description of HIV testing and healthcare experiences among trans women in Ghanaian urban slums BSGH-012' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Global Public Health.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact globalpubhealth@plos.org.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Global Public Health.

Best regards,

Julia Robinson

Executive Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: I don't know

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I reviewed the submitted version and consider that all suggestions were accepted in the current version. As my only observation, I missed the mention of table 1 in the text. Correct the term, it is not table but chart.

Reviewer #2: Thank you for your work on this revision. The paper is much improved.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Rebecca Giguere

**********

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data. Dataset of participant responses in the study on HIV testing experiences among transgender women in Ghanaian urban slums.

    This dataset includes anonymized data on positive and negative experiences, healthcare interactions, and demographic details, collected during face-to-face interviews.

    (DOCX)

    pgph.0003980.s001.docx (17.4KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_HDD (1).docx

    pgph.0003980.s002.docx (26.3KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All data can be found in the manuscript and Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLOS Global Public Health are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES