Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0309378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309378

Gendered narratives and cultural shifts: A qualitative study on decadal changes in community alcohol consumption

Ming Gui Tan 1, Walton Wider 2, Nicholas Tze Ping Pang 3, Helen Benedict Lasimbang 3, Wendy Diana Shoesmith 3,4, Corine Rosapane M Tangau 1, Leilei Jiang 5, Natchana Bhutasang 6,*
Editor: Gabriel Caluzzi7
PMCID: PMC11611190  PMID: 39621663

Abstract

Alcohol consumption has been a central practice in Sabah, Malaysia. However, this region has witnessed a nuanced shift in drinking habits over the last decade, raising concerns about the health, economic, and social implications of alcohol use within the community in Sabah. This study explores the impact of gender narratives and cultural transformations on alcohol consumption within Sabah over the last decade. The objectives of this research include 1) assessing the shifts in alcohol consumption patterns over the last 10 years, 2) understand the role of gender differences in shaping these patterns, and 3) identify the economic consequences resulting from the changes. Employing a qualitative approach, we conducted focus group interviews with members of the native community, each group consisting of up to 7 participants. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes pertaining to gender roles, cultural practices, and socioeconomic influences of alcohol consumption. The data were then contextualized using Bronfenbrenner’s social-ecological model and social role theory. The study reveals a significant shift in drinking habits. Historically, alcohol was mostly consumed by men, but now more women are drinking, changing long-standing gender roles related to alcohol use. Children often copy their parents’ drinking behaviors, and with alcohol being more easily available, more people are drinking than before. Our findings also expose the complex consequences of alcohol use, which extend to health concerns, familial tension, and economic hardship. Despite the entrenched cultural status of alcohol, these negative outcomes are exacerbated by a lack of supportive healthcare services. In light of these insights, the study suggests the need for intervention plans that respect the cultural background of Sabah and account for gender dynamics while tackling the current issues of alcohol misuse. The research adds to the wider conversation about managing alcohol in different cultural settings and also recommended strategies based on the findings, such as cultural and gender sensitive community programs, youth centered programs, community-based healthcare services, employment support and training and development of laws and policies.

Introduction

Sabah, a state that exhibits notable cultural and economic differences from West Malaysia, is recognized as one of the leading regions in the country with a significantly elevated prevalence of alcohol consumption [1]. Reflecting a broader global trend, recent studies indicate a narrowing gender gap in alcohol use, with an increasing number of women engaging in alcohol consumption [2, 3]. This change is particularly relevant in Sabah, where its distinctive sociocultural dynamics, shaped by the Kadazandusun community, play a significant role in alcohol consumption patterns [4]. Within this context, it is worth noting the significant prevalence of alcohol misuse, which is a pattern of alcohol consumption that leads to adverse health and social consequences [5, 6]. In the traditional celebrations of Sabah, alcohol consumption has been deeply ingrained throughout history [7]. This is especially true during the harvest festival known as the Kaamatan festival. This annual harvest ceremony holds great significance among the Kadazandusun community [8]. In this context, it is observed that the consumption of traditional home-brewed alcoholic beverages such as tapai and montoku holds significance, as they have been historically associated with various ceremonial occasions including the New Year, Christmas, birthdays, and routine social gatherings [911]. This paradoxical relationship between deep-rooted cultural practice and rising alcohol-related problems illustrates the lack of insight to the underlying driving forces.

However, while traditional and ceremonial practices celebrate alcohol as part of the cultural heritage, consumption patterns show a shift towards misuse. The consumption of alcohol is closely associated with cultural practices, particularly within indigenous communities [1]. For example, the Kadazandusun community is acknowledged for its distinctive patterns of alcohol consumption and ceremonies involving alcoholic beverages [12]. Despite the cultural emphasis on moderation, societal engagement, and spiritual obligations [4], the rising incidence of alcohol-related issues such as domestic violence, absenteeism, motor accidents, and physical confrontations remains concerning [6, 13]. Approximately 23.6% of alcohol consumption in Sabah can be classified as "risky," indicating the significant nature of this matter [14]. This paradox between the cultural practice and rising problems related to alcohol consumption highlights the insufficient understanding of sociocultural factors driving these changes.

Therefore, our study aims to unveil the complex relationship between tradition and alcohol-related issues, thereby laying down a strong foundation for future work to create culturally sensitive interventions. Firstly, we provide a literature review to give background on the role of alcohol in the history, and culture of Sabah and the theoretical framework employed throughout the study. We then detail our methods, focusing on how we used focus group discussions and thematic analysis to understand alcohol use. The findings section reveals the influence of gender and culture on how people in Sabah view and use alcohol. The objectives of this study include: 1) assessing the shifts in alcohol consumption patterns over the last 10 years, 2) understanding the role of gender differences in shaping these patterns, and 3) identifying the economic consequences resulting from these changes.

The importance of this study is twofold. On one hand, it offers insights to potential stakeholders to develop culturally appropriate programs in managing problems with alcohol misuse. On the other hand, this study contributes to the scientific community by offering a broader and more comprehensive understanding of how cultural and gender influence alcohol consumption patterns.

Literature review

Sociocultural, economic, and demographic factors are closely linked to the patterns of alcohol consumption in Sabah, Malaysia. In order to enhance our comprehension of these patterns, it is crucial to provide further details on the particular studies mentioned and critically evaluate their impacts on the field. Joseph et al. [10] highlighted the contrasting effects of alcohol by examining its influence on various aspects such as health, behavior, social dynamics, economy, and psychology. This study was utilized for its extensive analysis of the impacts of alcohol, which served as a basis for comprehending the complex aspects of alcohol consumption in Sabah. The authors demonstrated that moderate alcohol consumption can yield beneficial effects on both individuals and communities. However, while their research offers insights into the impact of alcohol consumption on the quality of life, the sample population may not be able to reflect the unique cultural landscape of Sabah. Furthermore, the study does not adequately consider the deep-seated cultural beliefs about alcohol that are prevalent in Sabah, which could significantly influence alcohol consumption patterns.

Alcohol plays a crucial role in the cultural and traditional practices of the indigenous communities in Sabah, serving as an essential component deeply woven into their social structure. In their study, Abd Rashid et al. [5] have identified a significant association between sex, religion, and obsessive-compulsive disorder with alcohol consumption in the background of increasing prevalence of alcohol use in several regions of Sabah. However, the study focuses narrowly on the role of religion without fully exploring the role of other cultural perspectives that may not be driven by religion, such as alcohol use in ceremonies and community norms about drinking.

Looking at other studies that address interventions in reducing alcohol-related problems, some studies like the one Shoesmith et al. [15] emphasized economic factors, such as taxation, as a primary approach to curb alcohol use. While this focus on regulatory measures through taxation may be helpful, it risks overlooking the cultural significance of alcohol in indigenous communities, which can backfire by fostering resistance among them. Moreover, Robert Lourdes et al. [1] and Mutalip et al. [14] included important demographic determinants such as gender, age, education, employment, and smoking habit in their analysis of alcohol consumption across Malaysia. Although they provide valuable insights into the general trends of alcohol consumption, the applicability of their findings to Sabah may be limited due to the diverse cultural perspectives on alcohol across different Malaysian states. Additionally, both groups of authors explore the cultural dynamics that influence alcohol consumption, which is a central element of our research. Regarding the general trend of alcohol consumption, Manickam et al. [16] and Mutalip et al. [17] have laid a good foundation by establishing the prevalence of alcohol use among young individuals. That being said, there remains a need to explore the factors motivating young people to consume alcohol, and whether these factors differ from those influencing adults.

As for the theoretical framework, this study employs Bronfenbrenner’s social-ecological model alongside the social role theory. Bronfenbrenner’s model provides a clear lens to view the pattern of alcohol use in Sabah across different levels–from the individual to broader societal impacts, including historical changes, which further facilitates the conceptualization of potential interventions [18]. Meanwhile, the social role theory helps to explore the narrowing gender gap in alcohol use as well as offering insights into the differing perceptions and behaviors between genders regarding alcohol consumption [19].

Collectively, these studies highlight a range of factors influencing alcohol consumption in Sabah but leave behind a common gap–the cultural and gender dynamics underlying the observations made by these studies are not thoroughly explored.

Methodology

Participants

The western coast is the focal point of the alcohol abuse epidemic due to cultural dynamics. However, due to the ongoing movement restriction in Malaysia amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, our target areas were confined to regions accessible from Kota Kinabalu. We engaged with village heads through networking to identify zones that agreed for interviews. Consequently, four zones, namely Kota Kinabalu (KK), Kudat, Penampang, and Kiulu, were selected as our target study areas, covering a vast geographical spread of 160km, thereby offering a diverse range of perspectives. The recruitment period started from 1 July 2020 to 31 August 2021.

Volunteer sampling was employed in recruiting participants, where anyone who was interested in discussing the alcohol consumption situation in the village and was at least 12 years of age was recruited. The age of 12 was used as a cutoff to strike a balance between the capacity to engage in extensive discussions and diversity of view. Participants less than 18 years old needed permission from their legal guardians to join the focus groups. They were also given reimbursement after completing the interview to incentivize participation.

One or more focus groups were formed in each target study area, each group consisting of 6 to 7 study participants. The youngest participant was 14 years old whereas the oldest was 81 years old. Our study involved 7 focus group discussions, comprising 6 to 7 members each.

Procedure

Each focus group was supervised by a research associate accompanied by a facilitator. The facilitator helped to ensure clarity and cultural relevance using the local dialect on an as-needed basis. Additionally, the facilitator was responsible for recruiting participants and recording the sessions. At the start of each session, the objectives of the study and confidentiality protocols were clearly explained to participants, who then provided signed informed consent forms. For participants below 18 years of age, consent was obtained from their legal guardians. The group discussions took place in a community hall or similar common gathering area, ensuring privacy by not allowing unrelated personnel to be present.

Interviews were primarily conducted in Bahasa Malaysia, the nation’s official language. However, the local dialect was occasionally employed to facilitate a deeper comprehension. Interviews typically lasted about 1.5 hours and were guided by questions developed through collaborative discussions with peers and stakeholders, which were:

  1. How has alcohol consumption in your community evolved over the past decade?

  2. How do gender and culture affect alcohol consumption in your community?

The facilitation process was designed to encourage open and honest dialogue, ensuring that all participants felt comfortable and valued by adopting a non-judgmental stance. Throughout the interview, efforts were made to encourage the expression of ideas and more extensive explanations. The facilitator also actively identified participants who may have been marginalized during the interview process and made attempts to ensure all participants were given an equal opportunity to voice their opinions.

Once the interviews concluded, participants were granted reimbursements in diverse forms such as food supplies, T-shirts, and face masks prepared in goodie bags. Participants who report alcohol use indicative of dependence or harmful patterns, or those exhibiting signs of potential mental health issues will be advised to seek evaluation at the nearest health clinics. Whereas for participants under 18 years old, their legal guardians will be notified and encouraged to facilitate an assessment.

Reflexivity

Several characteristics of the main researcher may color his view on this topic. The main researcher, a healthcare practitioner specializing in psychiatry with an urban background, and having influenced by Buddhist philosophy, initially approached the study of alcohol consumption primarily as a coping mechanism. This perspective was challenged during the research, especially when encountering the perceived paradox of the intertwining "good" and "bad" aspects of alcohol, such as its recreational use (bad) as part of family bonding (good).

Throughout the coding process, the main researcher noticed an initial tendency to focus extensively on the negative impacts of alcohol. Reflecting on this bias, deliberate efforts were made to reconsider how the role of alcohol was conceptualized. This involved iterative revisions of the coding framework to ensure a more balanced representation of the impact of alcohol use. Regular discussions and debates with peers during the coding and theme formation stages also helped to enhance the neutrality of the conceptualization.

Interpersonally, the dynamics within the interview settings also required careful navigation. Firstly, the researcher acknowledged the potential power imbalance between the researchers and participants, which might lead them to provide responses they thought were expected. Furthermore, variations in religious beliefs, age, and gender among participants may have influenced the power dynamics within the group, especially during discussions on controversial topics such as underage drinking. It was challenging to balance between having a diverse group which could introduce complex power dynamics that might hinder open discussions, and having a homogenous group (such as same gender or similar age range) which risked creating an echo chamber. Some of the strategies used to address these challenges include maintaining reflective diaries to document and manage potential biases, particularly during the coding phase. Regular discussions with supervisors provided external perspectives, ensuring a broader and neutral interpretation of the data.

Ethical considerations

During our qualitative research, we recognized that the close-knit nature of the village communities may lead to participants withholding information due to the presence of other community members, affecting the depth of their responses. To address these concerns and ensure the accuracy of our data, we implemented strict measures to protect participants’ identities and the confidentiality of the discussions. Data anonymization procedures included the use of pseudonyms for participants and the removal of identifiable information from transcripts. We used alphabetical codes (A to G) and group numbers (1 to 7). Specific details about locations or other identifying information were intentionally left out. By taking these measures, we aimed to build trust and ensure participants felt comfortable sharing their genuine experiences. All data were stored securely on password-protected devices to ensure confidentiality. After transcribing and verifying the accuracies of the audio recordings, they were destroyed from all devices.

Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the Universiti Malaysia Sabah.

Data analysis

Following the six-phase process proposed by Braun and Clarke [20], our thematic analysis began with the transcription of audio recordings from participant interviews. A third-party assistant with specialized training handled this transcription, aiming for both precision and an impartial reflection of participants’ statements to minimize potential biases at the outset. Upon acquiring the transcribed data, our analysis proceeded through manual thematic analysis, supported by ChatGPT for efficient data organization.

The researcher began by listening to the audio recordings and repeatedly reading through the transcriptions to become deeply familiar with the content. This phase involved noting inflections, breaks, and other nuances to fully understand the data.

During the code development phase, a hybrid model of coding (inductive and deductive) was employed. Initially, some codes such as "pandemic" and "tradition" were predefined. As the analysis progressed, additional codes like "selection" emerged from the data. ChatGPT was utilized to identify and tag contextually relevant keywords corresponding to these codes, facilitating the retrieval process and allowing the researcher to efficiently highlight relevant quotations within the transcripts.

Once coding was completed, the focus shifted to developing themes by interpreting and organizing codes into meaningful groups. For instance, the codes “motivating,” initially defined as “factors or reasons that encourage the initiation or continuation of drinking,” and “embrace,” defined as “views that acknowledge both positive and negative aspects of alcohol,” were merged into a single code-named “motivating factors.” This new code encompassed factors, reasons, and views that support the initiation or continuation of drinking.

Through iterative discussions within the research team, patterns were identified, and candidate themes were actively constructed to address the research questions. These themes were refined and finalized after a thorough review process. An expert review process was integral to evaluating the themes, involving feedback from seasoned researchers and representatives of the studied community.

In the conceptualization phase, themes were examined through the lens of Bronfenbrenner’s social-ecological model and social role theory. This approach explored the immediate social contexts of alcohol use (microsystem) and extended implications such as community norms (exosystem). The social role theory provided insight into how participants’ views and behaviors are shaped by their social roles, with a focus on the relationship between gender roles and drinking behaviors.

Finally, all themes were consolidated and examined through the theoretical lens, and a report was put together to clearly describe our findings. The tagging and retrieval capabilities of ChatGPT ensured that the analysis was efficient and thorough, allowing for detailed quotations to be identified and discussed to maintain objectivity and neutrality. ChatGPT provides leverage in managing large volume of data quickly. However, we recognise its limitations such as the potential for misinterpretation of certain context, figure of speech and nuances in human language. Therefore, peer debriefing sessions and peer discussions provided an additional layer of scrutiny, reinforcing the reliability and credibility of our findings.

Results

Based on all the responses gathered, four themes emerged.

Tradition and the shifting role of alcohol

The consumption of alcohol in our community is deeply entangled with traditions and changing perceptions. Throughout history, alcohol has played a pivotal role in celebrations and rites of passage, a sentiment echoed by a respondent who remarked on the inescapability of tradition, "…cannot escape tradition…" (B6). However, contemporary narratives suggest a shift from these traditional moorings. One respondent captured this evolution, stating, "It feels like the traditional meaning has been lost now. People used to drink to celebrate, but now it’s more to run away from problems." (F1). This indicates a profound change in the role and significance of alcohol within the community—from a symbol of joy and communal bonding to a means of escape from personal and societal issues. The entrenched status of alcohol within their culture is further demonstrated by the prevailing sense of disappointment over the waning tradition of alcohol brewing. For example, the Kaamatan festival that is traditionally associated with religious celebration has seen shifts from traditional tapai consumption to a more commercialized and less ritualistic drinking pattern.

The COVID-19 pandemic has further complicated the prevalence of alcohol use, exerting dual effects influenced by various factors. While movement restrictions imposed by the local government might have limited access to alcohol, thereby reducing consumption for some, the accompanying economic decline and increased social isolation have conversely led to an increase in alcohol consumption for others. A participant explained, “The use of alcohol has changed from the past because there was no COVID-19 pandemic before; people spent time going to work to earn a living. Now, many are out of work, many don’t know what to do, and they drink alcohol to kill time” (F1). This reflection not only demonstrates the impact of the pandemic on daily life and employment but also highlights the transition of alcohol use towards the role of a coping mechanism.

Moreover, the analysis revealed a concerning trend of underage drinking. Although participants under 18 denied consuming alcohol, adults recalled their first experiences with alcohol at ages as young as 8 or 9. Traditionally, alcohol consumption in the community served ritualistic purposes. However, recent trends indicate a shift toward non-ceremonial drinking at increasingly younger ages. A significant factor contributing to early exposure to alcohol is parental influence. Although typically, parents act as deterrents to early alcohol use, from our observation, we notice that parents could also introduce their children to alcohol. For instance, one participant recalled, “I started drinking as young as 10 when I followed my parents to neighbours’ houses” (D4). Additionally, there appears to be a relaxation in the traditional supervisory roles of parents, reflected by a participant narrating how he used to drink behind his parents’ backs. This phenomenon reflects not only a change in family dynamics and supervision, but also a shift of the role of alcohol from regulated use in ceremonies to a more casual use in other common situations.

The double-edged sword of visibility and accessibility

The alcohol availability in our community has experienced substantial changes, as highlighted by a respondent’s observation: "In this place, there are no obstacles or prohibitions to buying alcohol" (E2), illustrating the ease with which alcohol can now be purchased. This ease of access extends beyond commercially sold alcohol to include local homebrewing. As one participant described, “Here, we used to make our alcohol using rice and medicine, and it had to be made for a week before it could be consumed” (A3). This traditional homebrewing process, while requiring specific ingredients and significant time, contrasts with the readily available commercial alcohol, which offers consistent year-round availability. Through this deeply rooted cultural tradition, the mood of pride and self-reliance could be observed. Nevertheless, in some regions, traditional brews remain the preferred choice due to the ease of storing ingredients and alcohol. This preference is especially noticed in rural areas where commercial alcohol is less accessible. A participant reported, “…every house must have a stock of alcohol, especially in village areas, because this alcohol can last for several months…” (A1). Furthermore, “…tapai is easily available because it is made from ingredients like cassava or rice. Modern canned drinks are hard to find now unless you go to the city…” (A1). These observations reveal a seemingly contradictory yet fundamentally similar theme–accessibility, where each phenomenon ultimately caters to the need for accessible alcohol.

The transition from scarcity to abundance is further reflected by another respondent, who noted, "It used to be hard to find stores that sold alcohol. Now they are almost on every corner" (A2). This change points to a dramatic increase in the physical visibility of alcohol, making it a commonplace feature in the Sabahan community. Echoing this sentiment, another respondent adds, "Alcohol is cheaper and easier to find compared to ten years ago" (F7), indicating not only increased availability but also affordability over time. The ubiquity of alcohol is captured in the routine experiences of community members, as one person remarked, "…we often go into Speedmart 99. When we go in, we see it there." (E6). These statements reflect how alcohol has seamlessly integrated into daily life and consumer habits.

Collectively, the increasing accessibility and affordability of alcohol may lead to higher rates of misuse and dependence within the community. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining alcohol, combined with existing behavioral reinforcements such as peer influence and stress relief, raises concerns about promoting alcohol consumption among younger individuals below 18 years old. This trend is particularly alarming as underage drinking is not only prevalent but often occurs in contexts where alcohol is seen as an acceptable part of social interactions. For example, young people may start drinking under the guise of cultural traditions, which can obscure the severity of early alcohol exposure.

Social influences and evolving gender norms in alcohol consumption

The patterns of alcohol consumption in our community are greatly influenced by peer pressure and changing gender norms, which demonstrate the interaction of social constructs. One respondent encapsulated the peer pressure phenomenon among the youth, stating, "Sometimes, when consumed among teenagers, it is referred to as ’psycho’, wanting to show oneself as someone strong" (G1). This desire to show their bravado illustrates how young individuals use alcohol to conform to peer expectations. The pressure to conform extends to adults as well, another participant added, "…if we don’t drink, they will ignore us" (A2), it is obvious that there can be social consequences for abstaining. Beyond peer influence, there is also a strong cultural pressure stemming from longstanding traditions to partake in alcohol consumption. This cultural expectation is so ingrained that refusing to drink can sometimes be seen as going against communal norms.

Family influence also plays a pivotal role in shaping attitudes and behaviors toward alcohol. The narrative, "If parents drink, it’s highly likely their children will also drink" (A2), points to the generational transmission of drinking habits, underscoring the impact of parental behavior on children. This notion of familial legacy in alcohol consumption is further supported by another participant, who observed, "…it’s been from long ago, from parents, grandparents, they indeed drank. So, our generation now, follow in their footsteps" (E3). Such observations highlight how family traditions contribute to the continuity of alcohol consumption across generation, which not only sustains traditional practices, but also perpetuates potentially harmful behaviors associated with alcohol use.

A significant shift in gender dynamics shows increasing active participation from women in alcohol consumption, traditionally dominated by men. "I remember before only men drank. Now, I see many women also drinking" (A4), one respondent remarked, as well as "Before, I thought only men could make alcohol at home. Now, I see many women also trying to make it themselves" (C4). Despite these advancements, societal judgments persist, with a discernible bias in how male and female drinkers are perceived, "There’s a difference in our society. If a man drinks, people say he’s strong. But if a woman drinks, they look down on her" (B4). This dichotomy suggests that while progress has been made, deep-seated cultural norms still influence the acceptance of female alcohol consumption. Furthermore, according to one of the participants, “…because when her husband drinks, the woman automatically takes care of him, especially if he is around 40 or 50 years old…” (B5), suggests that the traditional supportive role of women had contributed to male dominance in alcohol consumption.

The multifaceted impact of alcohol consumption

The consumption of alcohol has wide-ranging repercussions, ranging from health, relationships, work, to financial stability. Often beginning with experimentation in youth, the journey into long-term alcohol use can bring about negative implications. One participant reflected, “I used to drink to forget my problems. But now I realize it only adds to the problems” (D2), indicating a recognition of the detrimental effects of alcohol use later in life and the ineffectiveness of alcohol consumption as a coping mechanism.

On a personal level, health deterioration due to the direct and indirect effects of longstanding alcohol use is a significant concern elicited from the group discussions. As stated by a respondent, “I try to stop drinking because I feel it affects my health” (D2), this demonstrates a conscious decision to reduce health risks by decreasing alcohol intake. Imbalanced food intake during intoxication and an increased speed of aging are some health concerns reflected by participants. Addiction, ranging from dependence to severe misuse, is another crucial topic throughout all target zones. On a lesser level, some individuals were willing to spend more on obtaining alcohol than on any other necessities in life. However, in extreme cases, people have brought physical harm to themselves while intoxicated, including ingesting poison due to exacerbated despair and involvement in road traffic accidents.

The negative effects of alcohol extend beyond personal health to interpersonal relationships. Alcohol consumption has strained family bonds, as encapsulated by one participant, “I feel drinking alcohol can damage health and family relationships” (D7). Marital conflicts often arise with the use of alcohol, either through exacerbating pre-existing tensions or creating new conflicts: “…they would bring up old matters and quarrel about that when they are drunk…” (A2). These marital conflicts are not limited to the couples but also affect their children, leading to emotional trauma and physical displacement from home until the dispute is resolved. Additionally, interracial tensions can be heightened through alcohol-mediated disinhibition, contributing to physical fights.

The workplace is also affected by alcohol use, evidenced by accounts of job losses attributable to drinking, “…lost their job because they got drunk at work…” (F1). This phenomenon, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic facilitating alcohol use, could have a double negative effect on occupational settings. Furthermore, financial strain is another concern related to alcohol use. The shift from spending on alcohol to prioritizing family finances is evident in the reflection of one participant: “I used to spend a lot of money on alcohol. Now I try to save that money for my family” (D7). This shift in perspective demonstrates a growing awareness of the financial toll of excessive alcohol consumption.

While these personal experiences highlight the negative consequences of alcohol on health, relationships, employment, and finances, it is essential to explore the broader societal factors contributing to these impacts. Determinants such as socioeconomic disparities, access to healthcare, cultural norms, alcohol marketing practices, regulatory policies, and healthcare interventions play a significant role in influencing consumption patterns and outcomes.

Discussion

Previous studies mentioned in the literature review section have succinctly demonstrated the prevalence of alcohol consumption and patterns of consumption, examined how religion and culture affect alcohol use, and explored how economic factors like taxation can influence alcohol consumption. While the findings of this study align with existing literature on the significant role of cultural traditions and social pressures in shaping alcohol consumption patterns, they shed light on the complex interplay of underpinning sociocultural and gender-related dynamics.

Historically, alcohol has been deeply ingrained in the cultural fabric of this community, playing a central role in ceremonies and celebrations, akin to many indigenous societies globally [21]. Traditional alcoholic beverages like tapai, lihing, tumpung, and bahar have symbolized communal unity and ancestral customs, though their significance has evolved over time, with alcohol now serving as a coping mechanism for some individuals amidst life’s challenges [22, 23]. This transition from traditional to more problematic uses of alcohol challenges the notion that cultural traditions solely act as a protective factor against alcohol misuse [5].

The effects of global events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent Movement Control Order (MCO) on consumption patterns were seemingly contradictory. While urban areas experienced a reduction in alcohol consumption due to restrictions on mass gatherings, rural regions witnessed a continuation of traditional drinking habits, indicating a geographical shift in consumption patterns [24]. These changes reflect broader global trends where societal stressors drive individuals towards substance use [24, 25]. This relates to our findings, which show how accessibility to urban areas and availability of alcohol production mediate the impact of the pandemic on consumption patterns. Our study supports the findings by Shoesmith et al. [15] that economic limitations are closely associated with alcohol use. Furthermore, the availability and accessibility of alcohol highlighted in our research coincides with the findings of Robert Lourdes et al. [1].

The discussion also highlights the influence of age, urbanization, and beverage preferences on alcohol consumption. Older generations in rural areas tend to favor traditional homemade beverages, whereas younger demographics in urban settings lean towards commercially available alcoholic drinks [26]. Youth involvement in alcohol consumption is concerning, with peer influence and societal pressures driving premature and potentially hazardous drinking habits [27]. Family dynamics and community regulations also shape alcohol-related behaviors, with parental attitudes towards alcohol influencing offspring in complex ways [28]. For instance, the intergenerational transmission of drinking habits through cultural ceremonies highlights the significance of alcohol in maintaining social cohesion. Although unique local traditions, such as the brewing and consumption of tapai and lihing, continue to influence drinking patterns, they coexist with the convenience and affordability of commercially available alcohol, reflecting a blend of old and new approaches to maintaining the cultural heritage. Additionally, the socioeconomic disparities brought about by urbanization, such as financial hardship and employment instability, play a significant role in shaping alcohol consumption as a coping mechanism. These findings echo the findings of the research by Joseph [29] that highlighted the role of family influence in the continuation of drinking habits.

Furthermore, the evolving gender dynamics in alcohol consumption reveal a transition towards increased active participation of women, reflecting broader shifts in gender roles [5]. This shift can be attributed to several driving factors, including increased socioeconomic and educational opportunities for women, empowering women to depart from their passive roles in a community. Despite these changes, we observed the lingering presence of gender biases and societal judgments that continue to challenge the transitioning role of women. This uncovers the ongoing tension between traditional norms and contemporary practices. These findings illustrate the complex gender dynamics in alcohol consumption and emphasize the need for targeted interventions to promote gender equality and cultural acceptance.

The detrimental effects of alcohol on health, interpersonal relationships, and risky behaviors shows the need for more comprehensive interventions, including educational counselling services on moderate alcohol use [30, 31]. Despite the inadequacy of health services related to alcohol, initiatives driven by religious affiliations have dominated legislative discussions, indicating a gap in addressing core issues [31]. Our results further reinforce the findings of previous studies by demonstrating the combined impact of traditional and modern alcohol consumption practices on health issues. [1, 14] Overall, the discussion emphasizes the multifaceted nature of alcohol consumption within the Sabah community and the need for tailored interventions to address its cultural, social, and health-related dimensions.

In terms of theoretical framework, Bronfenbrenner’s social-ecological model sheds light on how different social contexts, from individual experiences to broader societal influences, influence alcohol consumption patterns. It allows us to view the layers of influence that shape drinking habits, namely the microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem and chronosystem. The microsystem denotes the immediate environment of the individual, including family and peer influence. Our study highlights the effects of parental drinking on younger individuals, and also pointed out the role of peer pressure in early exposure to alcohol use. The interactions between family, peer groups and the community forms the mesosystem that changes an individual’s approach to alcohol use, such as community activities that reinforce drinking habits at home. As for the exosystem, the accessibility of alcohol, especially in rural areas where homebrewing is common, as well as local policies on alcohol sales play a crucial role in maintaining drinking habits. Simultaneously, economic hardships exacerbated by the pandemic also led to a heterogenous pattern of alcohol use to individuals from different communities. Cultural traditions that are deeply ingrained in the Sabahan community make up the macrosystem, which are also ever evolving and in the downstream altering social acceptance and patterns of alcohol use. The macrosystem also consists of evolving gender dynamics that reflect broader changes, with increased active participation of women in alcohol use, challenging traditional gender roles. Lastly, the chronosystem, representing changes over time, is reflected through the shifts driven by the COVID-19 pandemic and generational shifts.

Besides the social-ecological model, the study is also viewed through the lens of social role theory to explain how changing gender roles in the community affect both drinking patterns and perceptions towards alcohol use. In our study, we observe a significant shift in the traditional roles of women. Although driving force behind this shift was not explored, one hypothesis is that there is increased socioeconomic and educational opportunities for women, allowing them to step away from their passive roles within the community. Nevertheless, despite these advancements, societal judgments persist, in particularly how the drinking behaviors of men and women are interpreted within the community. This ongoing tension between traditional societal norms and contemporary changes illustrates the complex gender dynamics in alcohol consumption. By using social role theory, we are able to elucidate how evolving gender roles reshape alcohol consumption patterns and perceptions within the Sabahan community.

Limitations and recommendations for future research

The research presented primarily focuses on the western coast of the Sabah community, which might not capture the entirety of practices and perspectives prevalent in other regions within Sabah. This geographical focus presents a limitation in understanding the full depth and breadth of alcohol consumption patterns within the broader Sabah community. Moreover, the data captured in the study is up to the present time, therefore, given the fluid nature of societal perspectives and practices, the findings might not encapsulate potential future shifts.

Another significant consideration is the background of the researcher, both as a healthcare staff member and in terms of religious beliefs. These may have introduced a potential bias in the way participants responded, as they might have provided answers they deemed ’acceptable’ or ’expected’ within a healthcare context. This could particularly influence responses related to alcohol consumption patterns and their consequences.

Additionally, while the study emphasizes the historical and cultural importance of alcohol to the community, there might be limitations in the depth of exploration concerning specific rites, rituals, and traditions surrounding its use. Addressing the sensitive aspects of the research, especially around gender dynamics might also have been influenced by reporting biases. Furthermore, the exploration of the impacts of alcohol was not comprehensive, potentially limiting the depth of understanding regarding the full scope of alcohol-related consequences in the community.

For a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship of the Sabah community with alcohol, it would be beneficial to expand the geographical scope of future studies. This would ensure a richer understanding by capturing diverse views within Sabah. A longitudinal approach could provide invaluable insights into the evolving patterns of alcohol consumption and its broader implications.

Given the potential bias introduced by the researcher’s background, future studies should involve a diverse team of researchers and implement more rigorous peer discussions to ensure a neutral data collection process. This approach could alleviate participants’ concerns and encourage more candid responses.

A dedicated focus on the specific cultural and ceremonial uses of alcohol might offer a deeper dive into its traditional significance. Collaborating across disciplines with anthropologists, sociologists, and health professionals can paint a more holistic picture.

Lastly, the alarming trends among the youth that have been highlighted in the findings suggest a need for more in-depth studies targeting this demographic.

Conclusion

The narratives from the Sabah community reveal a complex interplay in the dynamics of alcohol consumption. While the cultural significance of alcohol consumption remains undeniable, seismic shifts are observed in the relationship of consumption with perceptions, evolving gender roles, and global events. As these influences intersect with local traditions, the emerging challenges are complex and require approaches that respect deep-rooted traditions, account for gender dynamics, and address contemporary issues.

Based on our findings in the study, we recommend a multifaceted approach to address the issues surrounding alcohol consumption in the Sabah community, which includes:

Cultural and gender sensitive community programs

These campaigns should be tailored to the cultural context of Sabah and leverage on local languages and cultural narratives to tackle alcohol misuse in a more relatable manner. Stories and testimonies of the harm of alcohol misuse and success of handling alcohol-related issues could be incorporated into these programs on top of didactic teachings to personalize the message. We also recommend promoting awareness about the negative implications of alcohol consumption through health programs, focusing on moderation instead of total abstinence from alcohol. These programs could be developed in collaboration with local non-governmental organizations, utilizing locals to approach their communities and thereby reducing resistance from villagers. Additionally, addressing the gender dynamics uncovered in this study calls for more gender-sensitive interventions, focusing on both the empowerment and protection of women against societal judgments.

Youth centered programs

Establish and reinforce pre-existing programs in schools and community centers aimed at preventing underage drinking. Strategies like engaging parents and caregivers in workshops to educate them on the impact of adult drinking behaviors on their children should also be considered. We also recommend engaging with youth in a wider variety of community-based programs to potentially replace alcohol misuse as a coping mechanism and social cohesion amongst peers.

Community-based healthcare services

As for the role of healthcare services, interventions for alcohol misuse should be prioritized, particularly in rural areas. These interventions should focus on managing alcohol dependence, addressing alcohol-related mental and physical health issues, and providing family-centered programs aimed at breaking the cycle of intergenerational transmission of drinking habits.

Employment support and training

Supported employment has been an essential component in the treatment of people with mental illness, there is an existing guideline on implementation supported employment programs in Malaysia. In managing individuals with alcohol misuse, job training and economic support programs may be employed to address the financial hardships that drive their drinking patterns, which could potentially reduce the reliance on alcohol as a coping mechanism.

Development of laws and policies

Regulations on the sale of alcohol should be reviewed and strengthened, particularly in rural areas where homebrewing is prevalent. The existing laws regarding the sale of alcohol to minors should also see increased enforcement to reduce accessibility and availability of alcohol to minors. At the policy development level, it is important to implement stricter regulations targeting high-risk groups, such as youth, while adopting a more relaxed approach for adults, aiming to reduce the prevalence of underage drinking while recognizing the autonomy of adults to drink in moderation.

While our study has explored the complexities of alcohol consumption patterns and sociocultural factors, there remains a need for future research to delve into the specific patterns identified. Future studies can build on our findings and contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of alcohol consumption patterns, such as through longitudinal studies to track the shifts we have observed or by investigating the impact of gender dynamics, including domestic violence. These efforts will enhance both the effectiveness of interventions and the well-being of the Sabahan community.

Data Availability

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10813061.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Robert Lourdes TG, Abd Hamid HA, Riyadzi MR, Rodzlan Hasani WS, Abdul Mutalip MH, Abdul Jabbar N, et al. Findings from a nationwide study on alcohol consumption patterns in an upper middle-income country. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(14):8851. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.White A. Gender differences in the epidemiology of alcohol use and related harms in the United States. Alcohol Res 40: 01. 2020. doi: 10.35946/arcr.v40.2.01 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McCaul ME, Roach D, Hasin DS, Weisner C, Chang G, Sinha R. Alcohol and women: A brief overview. Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research. 2019;43(5):774. doi: 10.1111/acer.13985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wider W, Suki NM, Lott ML, Nelson LJ, Low SK, Cosmas G. Examining criteria for adulthood among young people in sabah (East Malaysia). Journal of Adult Development. 2021;28(3):194–206. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Abd Rashid RB, Mohd Daud MNB, Guad RM, Gan SH, Wan Husin WAIB, Giloi N, et al. Prevalence and risk factors associated with alcohol consumption among indigenous people in Sabah Borneo Island. Australian Journal of Rural Health. 2021;29(3):464–72. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lasimbang HB, Shoesmith W, Mohd Daud MNB, Kaur N, Jin MCP, Singh J, et al. Private troubles to public issue: empowering communities to reduce alcohol-related harm in Sabah, Malaysia. Health promotion international. 2017;32(1):122–9. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dav090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Geraldine A. Sabah govt respects right of non-Muslims to consume alcohol. New Straits Time. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Annuar SNS, Dawayan CR. Kaamatan Goes Virtual: Utilizing Social Media in Promoting Tourism Event. Digital Transformation and Innovation in Tourism Events: Routledge; 2022. p. 60–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gimbad E. Cultivating Rice and Identity: An Ethnography of the Dusun People in Sabah, Malaysia [Master’s Thesis]: Western Sydney Universitiy; 2020.
  • 10.Joseph A, Lasimbang HB, James S, Seok CB. Effects of alcohol towards quality of life in the indigenous groups of the West Coast Division, Sabah, Malaysia. Borneo Journal of Medical Sciences (BJMS). 2020;14(2):19–. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tangit TM. Ethnic Labels and Identity among Kadazans in Penampang, Sabah (Malaysian Borneo) [Doctoral Dissertation]: The Australian National University; 2017.
  • 12.Omar R, Ilmiyah C, Robinson F, a karim H. Qualitative Study of Barriers in Adopting a Healthy Diet and Lifestyle Among Kadazandusun Community with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Sabah. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2022;12:507–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pang N, Lee G, Tseu M, Joss JI, Honey HA, Shoesmith W, et al. Validation of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT)–Dusun version in alcohol users in Sabahan Borneo. Archives of Psychiatry Research: An International Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences. 2020;56(2):129–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mutalip MHBA Kamarudin RB, Manickam M Abd Hamid HAB, Saari RB. Alcohol consumption and risky drinking patterns in Malaysia: findings from NHMS 2011. Alcohol and alcoholism. 2014;49(5):593–9. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agu042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shoesmith WD, Oo Tha N, Naing KS, Abbas RBH, Abdullah AF. Unrecorded alcohol and alcohol-related harm in rural Sabah, Malaysia: A socio-economically deprived region with expensive beer and cheap local spirits. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2016;51(6):741–6. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agw005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Manickam MA, Abdul Mutalip MHB, Hamid HABA, Bt Kamaruddin R, Sabtu MYB. Prevalence, comorbidities, and cofactors associated with alcohol consumption among school-going adolescents in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health. 2014;26(5_suppl):91S–9S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mutalip MHBA Naidu BBM, Kamaruddin RB Ab Hamid HAB, Ali NB Ahmad NAB, et al. How Severe is Binge Drinking in Malaysia and Who are at Risk? Journal of Alcoholism & Drug Dependence. 2013;1(6):1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ornstein MT, Caruso CC. The Social Ecology of Caregiving: Applying the Social–Ecological Model across the Life Course. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024;21(1):119. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Eagly AH, Wood W. Social role theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology. 2012;2:458–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pérez RL. Fiesta as tradition, fiesta as change: ritual, alcohol and violence in a Mexican community. Addiction. 2000;95(3):365–73. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.9533657.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Corbin WR, Farmer NM, Nolen-Hoekesma S. Relations among stress, coping strategies, coping motives, alcohol consumption and related problems: A mediated moderation model. Addictive Behaviors. 2013;38(4):1912–9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hasking P, Lyvers M, Carlopio C. The relationship between coping strategies, alcohol expectancies, drinking motives and drinking behaviour. Addictive behaviors. 2011;36(5):479–87. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kilian C, O’Donnell A, Potapova N, López‐Pelayo H, Schulte B, Miquel L, et al. Changes in alcohol use during the COVID‐19 pandemic in Europe: A meta‐analysis of observational studies. Drug and alcohol review. 2022;41(4):918–31. doi: 10.1111/dar.13446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pollard MS, Tucker JS, Green HD. Changes in adult alcohol use and consequences during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. JAMA network open. 2020;3(9):e2022942-e. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22942 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nordfjærn T, Brunborg GS. Associations between human values and alcohol consumption among Norwegians in the second half of life. Substance use & misuse. 2015;50(10):1284–93. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2014.998237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jernigan D, Noel J, Landon J, Thornton N, Lobstein T. Alcohol marketing and youth alcohol consumption: a systematic review of longitudinal studies published since 2008. Addiction. 2017;112:7–20. doi: 10.1111/add.13591 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ryan SM, Jorm AF, Lubman DI. Parenting factors associated with reduced adolescent alcohol use: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2010;44(9):774–83. doi: 10.1080/00048674.2010.501759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Joseph A. The Effect of Drinking Style on Alcohol-related Harm and Readiness to Change among the Indigenous Communities of Sabah. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Brisibe S, Ordinioha B, Dienye PO. Intersection between alcohol abuse and intimate partner’s violence in a rural Ijaw community in Bayelsa State, South-South Nigeria. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2012;27(3):513–22. doi: 10.1177/0886260511421676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kaur R, Garg S. Domestic violence against women: A qualitative study in a rural community. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health. 2010;22(2):242–51. doi: 10.1177/1010539509343949 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Annesha Sil

22 Feb 2024

PONE-D-23-38278Gendered narratives and cultural shifts: a qualitative study on decadal changes in community alcohol consumptionPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Tan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. The manuscript has been assessed by 2 reviewers and their comments are available below. The reviewers have raised some major concerns. They feel the manuscript would benefit from greater structure and detail in the abstract, stronger literature review and study rationale and elaboration of methodology and data analysis and discussion. Could you please carefully revise the manuscript to address all comments raised?

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 06 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Annesha Sil, PhD

Associate Editor, PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

2. We note that you have indicated that there are restrictions to data sharing for this study. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions

Before we proceed with your manuscript, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., a Research Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board, etc.). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories. You also have the option of uploading the data as Supporting Information files, but we would recommend depositing data directly to a data repository if possible.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

3. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well. 

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: My only comment is that you review the form of citation of the document, since they must be surnames and in some citations they have names, just verify according to the editorial guidelines. It is a good article and of great importance for theoretical bases of this problem.

Reviewer #2: This manuscript on gendered narratives and cultural shifts in alcohol consumption in the Sabah community has some potential. However, I found it wasn’t guided by a clear research question and was, at times, a little hard to follow. I’m also not sure this is the most appropriate journal for it (perhaps a journal more oriented sociological/cultural studies and substance use). Below I’ve listed some of the more substantial issues I found with the paper:

• I found the abstract difficult to follow – it jumped around without contextualising Sabah or providing a clear research question. More detail is needed here, and I would suggest a more structured abstract based off the introduction, methods, results and conclusion might be helpful.

• The structure of the paper needs to be outlined much earlier in the introduction, which I think will help. While the information is there, the current structure doesn’t always flow very coherently between topics and ideas

• You state the “study seeks to examine the trajectory of alcohol consumption within the Sabah community over the years” but I’m not sure you can do this with a study of only one timepoint. Perhaps it might be better to phrase this as reflections of cultural and gender shifts in alcohol consumption in Sabah

• The studies raised in the literature need elaboration – what did the studies do and why did you draw on them? Some of the studies seem to be focused on Sabah but others are drawn from Malaysia more broadly. What can/can’t these studies tell us? Where is the research gap you are filling?

• The methods are generally ok, but going through the COREQ checklist may help clarify some things. Importantly, the “Data Analysis” section is very underdone. How was the data “processed manually”? Was thematic analysis used? If so, how was it used? I’m also a little unsure about the use of ChatGPT as a tool to assist with analysis given the potential for bias/inaccuracies

• I found many of the themes too brief to provide substantial analysis and interpretation. Lots of words were used up writing out both translations of quotes (authors should decide if this is worth the wordcount used) and I didn’t feel like the themes told enough of a coherent story. I would consider collapsing themes if/where possible, but also using a reformulating the themes so they don’t read like lists of quotes from participants

• I felt the discussion spent a lot of time reviewing the literature, but didn’t incorporate the findings to draw out comparisons/differences from previous research. A stronger discussion that draws on both relevant literature alongside your findings would provide clearer implications/conclusions for the paper.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0309378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309378.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


11 Apr 2024

Reviewer 1:

My only comment is that you review the form of citation of the document, since they must be surnames and in some citations they have names, just verify according to the editorial guidelines. It is a good article and of great importance for theoretical bases of this problem.

Response: Thank you for the comments. We have revised accordingly.

Reviewer 2:

This manuscript on gendered narratives and cultural shifts in alcohol consumption in the Sabah community has some potential. However, I found it wasn’t guided by a clear research question

Response: We have made amendments and came up with a stronger research question.

I’m also not sure this is the most appropriate journal for it (perhaps a journal more oriented sociological/cultural studies and substance use)

Response: We feel that PLOS One is a suitable journal, as alcohol use is a very interdimensional and intertextual disorder that cuts across medicine, psychology, sociology and gender, hence we do not want to limit the scope by sending it to a very specific journal, but rather to a broad based journal.

I found the abstract difficult to follow – it jumped around without contextualising Sabah or providing a clear research question. More detail is needed here, and I would suggest a more structured abstract based off the introduction, methods, results and conclusion might be helpful.

Response: We have made necessary amendments according to this comment.

The structure of the paper needs to be outlined much earlier in the introduction, which I think will help. While the information is there, the current structure doesn’t always flow very coherently between topics and ideas

Response: We have restructured the introduction to present the outline clearly.

You state the “study seeks to examine the trajectory of alcohol consumption within the Sabah community over the years” but I’m not sure you can do this with a study of only one timepoint. Perhaps it might be better to phrase this as reflections of cultural and gender shifts in alcohol consumption in Sabah

Response: This has been amended.

The studies raised in the literature need elaboration – what did the studies do and why did you draw on them? Some of the studies seem to be focused on Sabah but others are drawn from Malaysia more broadly. What can/can’t these studies tell us? Where is the research gap you are filling?

Response: We've revised the paper to provide more details on cited studies, clarified their distinctions, and emphasized our contribution to filling the research gap

The methods are generally ok, but going through the COREQ checklist may help clarify some things. Importantly, the “Data Analysis” section is very underdone. How was the data “processed manually”? Was thematic analysis used? If so, how was it used? I’m also a little unsure about the use of ChatGPT as a tool to assist with analysis given the potential for bias/inaccuracies

Response: We reviewed the COREQ checklist to ensure clarity in our methods. We acknowledged the need for further detail in the "Data Analysis" section and elaborated on how the data was processed manually through thematic analysis. Regarding the use of ChatGPT, we understood your concerns about bias and inaccuracies and provided additional justification for its inclusion or considered alternative methods.

I found many of the themes too brief to provide substantial analysis and interpretation. Lots of words were used up writing out both translations of quotes (authors should decide if this is worth the wordcount used) and I didn’t feel like the themes told enough of a coherent story. I would consider collapsing themes if/where possible, but also using a reformulating the themes so they don’t read like lists of quotes from participants

Response: Thank you for your feedback. We have reviewed the themes and acknowledged the brevity you mentioned. We reconsidered the use of wordcount on translations of quotes and made adjustments. We collapsed themes where possible and reformulated them to ensure they provide a more coherent narrative, rather than reading like lists of participant quotes.

I felt the discussion spent a lot of time reviewing the literature, but didn’t incorporate the findings to draw out comparisons/differences from previous research. A stronger discussion that draws on both relevant literature alongside your findings would provide clearer implications/conclusions for the paper.

Response: We have revised the discussion so that it is now more concise now and draws out comparisons/differences from previous research.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0309378.s001.docx (16.1KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Gabriel Caluzzi

1 May 2024

PONE-D-23-38278R1Gendered narratives and cultural shifts: a qualitative study on decadal changes in community alcohol consumptionPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Bhutasang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 15 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Gabriel Caluzzi

Guest Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments:

The reviewers (who I note are new to the manuscript and reviewing it for the first time) are largely supportive, and have suggested a number of specific and general areas for revision. This includes suggestions for synthesis of the literature are some more detail in the analysis, discussion, and methodology sections.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

Reviewer #4: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #3: Partly

Reviewer #4: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #3: I Don't Know

Reviewer #4: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #3: 1.In the abstract, start off with a brief introduction to the background of the topic and pain points first. This will then give a good low towards how the research question came about and what the research aims to achieve. The objectives has to be made clearer.

2.I would suggest to highlight the increased alcohol consumption among women in the introduction as well because exploring the shifts in gender role is one of the main objectives that your study is set out to achieve.

3. What is the conceptual framework used to guide this study?

4. How was the topic guide developed?

5. Mention the type of reimbursement offered

6. Mention where did the study attain its ethical approval from.

7. Mention how was consent taken from those aged 18 years and below and was there any intervention suggested or given to minors who admitted to consuming alcohol.

Reviewer #4: Abstract:

Given the multifaceted nature of alcohol consumption in the Sabah community, I suggest the authors incorporate Bronfenbrenner's social-ecological model as a theoretical lens. This model can comprehensively capture the influences on behavior from individual to societal levels. By adopting this approach, the research can systematically analyze how factors like personal values, gender roles, family dynamics, societal perceptions, and community regulations intersect to shape alcohol consumption patterns. This comprehensive understanding will inform the development of community-centric solutions addressing multiple levels of influence, thus enhancing the effectiveness of interventions.

Introduction:

The introduction provides a thorough overview of the cultural significance and prevalence of alcohol consumption in Sabah, particularly within the Kadazandusun community. However, one major weakness is the lack of clear delineation between the historical context of alcohol use in ceremonial practices and the contemporary issues of alcohol misuse. While the introduction acknowledges the problematic implications of alcohol consumption, it does not sufficiently connect these issues to the broader socio-cultural dynamics of Sabah. Additionally, the introduction could benefit from a clearer articulation of the research gap or question that the study aims to address. Establishing this gap would provide a clearer context for the significance of the research and guide the reader towards the study's objectives.

Literature Review:

The literature review presents a broad overview of existing studies on alcohol consumption patterns in Sabah, Malaysia. However, it lacks critical engagement and synthesis of the literature, which diminishes its effectiveness. While summarizing the findings of various studies, the review fails to analyze the strengths and limitations of each study or to identify potential gaps or contradictions in the literature. A more critical approach would involve evaluating the methodological rigor of the studies, discussing the implications of their findings, and synthesizing the literature to highlight areas where further research is needed. Additionally, the review would benefit from a clearer articulation of how each study contributes to understanding alcohol consumption in Sabah specifically. I suggest the authors revise the literature review to provide a more in-depth analysis of existing research, critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each study, and identify gaps in the literature that their study aims to address. This will enhance the overall quality and relevance of the literature review to the current study's objectives.

Participants:

The major weakness of this section lies in the lack of detail regarding the selection criteria for participants and the rationale behind choosing the specific study areas. The section would benefit from providing more information on why these four zones were selected and how they represent the broader population of the western coast in terms of cultural dynamics and alcohol abuse. Additionally, while the age range of participants is mentioned, there is no explanation of how participants were recruited within this age range or whether any specific criteria were used to ensure diverse perspectives. To improve this section, the authors could provide a clearer rationale for the selection of study areas and participants, outline any specific inclusion criteria, and detail the recruitment process to ensure transparency and rigor in participant selection. Furthermore, including information on any efforts made to ensure diversity within the focus groups, such as considering gender, socioeconomic status, or ethnicity, would strengthen the overall methodology.

Procedure:

The major weakness of this section lies in its brevity and lack of detail regarding the procedure followed during the focus group discussions. While it outlines the general setup and duration of the interviews, it lacks specific information on the facilitation process, the structure of the discussions, and any measures taken to ensure the validity and reliability of the data collected. Additionally, there is no mention of any efforts made to address potential biases or power dynamics within the focus groups, such as ensuring equal participation among all participants or mitigating social desirability bias. To improve this section, the authors could provide a more comprehensive description of the facilitation process, including how the facilitator encouraged open dialogue and ensured all voices were heard. They should also detail any strategies used to maintain confidentiality and obtain informed consent from participants. Furthermore, discussing how the interview questions were developed and piloted could enhance the transparency and credibility of the research methodology. Finally, including information on how the data were analyzed, such as through thematic analysis or qualitative coding, would provide insight into the rigor of the research process.

Reflexivity:

This section on reflexivity effectively acknowledges potential biases and challenges inherent in the research process, such as the urban-centric perspective and the researcher's background. It demonstrates a thoughtful approach to addressing these issues through the use of reflective diaries and regular discussions with supervisors. These measures aim to enhance the credibility of the study by minimizing the impact of biases on data interpretation. Overall, the section appears well-considered and does not necessarily require revision. However, if the authors wish to provide additional detail on how reflexivity was integrated throughout the research process or how specific biases were identified and addressed, they could consider expanding this section for greater clarity and transparency.

Ethical consideration:

This section effectively addresses the ethical considerations related to participant confidentiality and the potential for community backlash. It outlines the measures taken to protect participants' identities, such as using alphabetical codes and omitting specific details about locations. By implementing these strict measures, the researchers aimed to build trust and create a safe environment for participants to share their experiences openly. Overall, the section appears well-written and does not necessarily require revision. However, if the authors wish to provide additional detail on how participant confidentiality was maintained throughout the research process or how participants were informed about these measures, they could consider expanding this section for further clarity.

Data analysis:

Strengths:

• Rigorous Transcription Process: The use of a third-party assistant with specialized training for accurate verbatim transcription minimizes potential biases and ensures the reliability of the data.

• Comprehensive Analytical Approach: The combination of manual thematic analysis and the utilization of ChatGPT for data organization demonstrates a thorough and systematic approach to data analysis.

• Iterative Code Development: The collaborative effort within the research team to develop and refine codes ensures that the analysis is grounded in the data and reflects the complexity of participants' experiences.

• Expert Review Process: Seeking feedback from seasoned researchers and community representatives enhances the credibility of the analysis and strengthens the validity of the findings.

Weaknesses:

• Lack of Detail on Analytical Techniques: While the section outlines the general analytical process, it could benefit from providing more explicit details on the specific techniques used during thematic analysis and how ChatGPT was employed to support the manual analysis.

• Limited Explanation of Peer Debriefing Sessions: Although mentioned, the section does not elaborate on how peer debriefing sessions were conducted or how they contributed to the analytical process.

Suggestions for Improvement:

• Provide More Detail on Analytical Techniques: The authors can enhance this section by explicitly outlining the steps involved in thematic analysis, including how themes were identified, coded, and refined. Additionally, they should explain in more detail how ChatGPT was utilized to support the manual analysis process.

• Elaborate on Peer Debriefing Sessions: The authors should provide a more detailed description of how peer debriefing sessions were conducted, including who participated, the frequency of sessions, and how feedback was incorporated into the analysis. This will strengthen the transparency and credibility of the analytical process.

Result

The Cultural Backbone and Its Evolution:

While the analysis under this theme adequately acknowledges the historical significance of alcohol and its evolving role within the community, it falls short in providing a deeper exploration of the underlying drivers behind the observed shifts in consumption patterns. The narrative touches upon the impact of external factors like the COVID-19 pandemic but lacks a comprehensive examination of the socio-economic, cultural, and psychological forces influencing these changes. Furthermore, there is a notable oversight in the analysis of underage drinking, with insufficient exploration of the factors contributing to its normalization and the potential repercussions for individuals and the community at large. Addressing these shortcomings would enhance the depth and criticality of the analysis, offering a more nuanced understanding of the complex dynamics surrounding alcohol consumption within the Sabah community.

The Double-Edged Sword of Visibility and Accessibility:

The analysis of findings under this theme adequately portrays the shift in alcohol availability and accessibility within the community, highlighting the ease with which alcohol can now be obtained compared to previous years. However, there is a lack of critical examination regarding the implications of this increased accessibility on alcohol-related behaviors and societal norms. The analysis fails to delve into the potential consequences of widespread alcohol availability, such as increased rates of alcohol misuse, underage drinking, or alcohol-related harm. Furthermore, while the narrative touches upon the affordability of alcohol, there is limited exploration of how changes in pricing may impact consumption patterns and socioeconomic disparities within the community. By addressing these gaps, the analysis could offer a more comprehensive understanding of the complex dynamics surrounding alcohol accessibility and its implications for community well-being.

Navigating Social Influences and Evolving Gender Norms in Alcohol Consumption:

The analysis of findings under this theme effectively highlights the influence of social constructs, such as peer pressure and evolving gender norms, on alcohol consumption patterns within the community. However, there is a notable absence of deeper exploration into the underlying reasons for these shifts in social dynamics and their broader implications. For instance, while the narrative touches upon the increasing participation of women in alcohol consumption and production, there is limited discussion on the societal factors driving this change or the potential consequences for gender equality and social norms. Additionally, while family influence is acknowledged, the analysis could benefit from a more nuanced examination of how intergenerational transmission of drinking habits intersects with broader social and cultural factors to shape attitudes and behaviors toward alcohol. By addressing these gaps, the analysis could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the complex interplay between social influences and alcohol consumption within the community.

The Multifaceted Impact of Alcohol on Life's Dimensions:

The analysis of findings under this theme effectively captures the multifaceted impact of alcohol consumption on various dimensions of life, including health, relationships, work, and financial stability. However, there is a potential weakness in the analysis concerning the depth of exploration into the underlying factors contributing to these impacts and the complexities of their interplay. While the narratives provide valuable insights into individuals' experiences and perceptions, there is a lack of discussion on broader societal factors that may exacerbate or mitigate these effects. For example, the analysis could delve deeper into the structural determinants of alcohol-related harm, such as socioeconomic disparities, access to healthcare, and cultural norms surrounding alcohol use. Additionally, while individual anecdotes shed light on the personal consequences of alcohol consumption, there is limited examination of systemic issues, such as alcohol marketing practices, regulatory policies, and healthcare interventions, which may influence patterns of consumption and associated outcomes. By incorporating a more comprehensive analysis of these contextual factors, the discussion could offer a richer understanding of the complex dynamics underlying the impact of alcohol on individuals and communities.

Discussion:

While the discussion effectively synthesizes the findings of the study with existing literature, it falls short in explicitly demonstrating the uniqueness of the findings compared to previous studies. Although it references broader trends and insights from prior research, it lacks a clear delineation of how the current study's findings diverge or contribute novel insights to the existing body of knowledge. To strengthen the discussion, it would be beneficial to explicitly highlight any novel findings or unique aspects uncovered by the study that distinguish it from previous research. This could involve identifying specific nuances or patterns in alcohol consumption behaviors within the Sabah community that have not been extensively documented in prior studies. By emphasizing the distinctiveness of the findings, the discussion could further underscore the significance of the study and its contribution to advancing understanding in the field of alcohol consumption research.

Conclusion:

The conclusion effectively summarizes the key findings and emphasizes the need for a holistic approach to addressing the complex dynamics of alcohol consumption in the Sabah community. However, one potential weakness is the lack of specific recommendations or actionable steps for addressing the identified challenges. While the conclusion highlights the importance of community-based solutions and awareness-raising efforts, it would be strengthened by providing more concrete suggestions for interventions or policies that could be implemented to address the evolving patterns of alcohol consumption. Additionally, the conclusion could benefit from a brief reflection on the implications of the study's findings for future research or practice in the field of alcohol misuse prevention and intervention. By incorporating these elements, the conclusion would offer a more comprehensive and actionable framework for addressing the complexities of alcohol consumption in the Sabah community.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #3: Yes: Kishwen Kanna Yoga Ratnam

Reviewer #4: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: with comments PONE-D-23-38278_R1_reviewer.pdf

pone.0309378.s002.pdf (1.1MB, pdf)
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0309378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309378.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


25 May 2024

The response to reviewers have been compiled and uploaded with the manuscript

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reviewer Comment Checklist 2.docx

pone.0309378.s003.docx (20.9KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Gabriel Caluzzi

16 Jul 2024

PONE-D-23-38278R2Gendered narratives and cultural shifts: a qualitative study on decadal changes in community alcohol consumptionPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Bhutasang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 30 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Gabriel Caluzzi

Guest Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Reviewer 1 has offered useful comments to improve this manuscript. These include increasing clarity; cohesiveness between literature, findings and conclusions; and clearly highlighted implications. I hope the authors can incorporate these without much restructuring of the paper.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #4: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #4: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #4: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #4: Abstract Revision Suggestions:

Clearly articulate specific gendered narratives and cultural shifts in alcohol consumption.

Provide examples from qualitative data to illustrate these narratives.

Detail cultural transformations influencing drinking habits.

Explain how these shifts interact with gender dynamics.

Describe the analytical framework used for interpreting data.

Discuss economic consequences linked to gender and cultural contexts.

Highlight implications for gender-sensitive and culturally appropriate public health interventions.

Mention the theoretical framework used to engage readers.

Introduction Revision Guidance:

Define key terms and theories related to gender differences, cultural dynamics, and alcohol misuse.

Emphasize decadal changes in alcohol consumption patterns.

Clearly state specific research objectives.

Literature Review Enhancements:

Synthesize findings across studies to develop a cohesive narrative.

Explore unique cultural beliefs influencing alcohol consumption.

Critique methodological approaches and biases.

Explicitly connect research objectives to identified gaps.

Focus on gender dynamics in alcohol use within Sabah.

Methodology Section Improvements:

Diversify sampling methods for better representation.

Justify age range selection for relevance.

Detail management of dialectal variations in data collection.

Expand on strategies for minimizing researcher bias.

Discuss ethical considerations and confidentiality measures.

Provide deeper insights into ChatGPT’s role in data analysis.

Results Section Refinements:

Enhance transitions between themes for clarity.

Provide comprehensive analysis across all themes.

Integrate participant quotes evenly to support findings.

Discussion Section Strengthening:

Link findings explicitly to relevant literature and theories.

Analyze the impact of COVID-19 on alcohol consumption.

Contextualize findings within broader Malaysian or global contexts.

Offer specific recommendations for policy interventions.

Conclusion Section Enhancement:

Summarize key findings and their implications succinctly.

Clarify connections between findings and recommendations.

Reinforce relevance to academic discourse and practical applications.

By addressing these areas, each section can be strengthened to improve coherence, clarity, and scholarly rigor in discussing alcohol consumption in Sabah, Malaysia.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #4: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: review comments.pdf

pone.0309378.s004.pdf (126.7KB, pdf)

Decision Letter 3

Gabriel Caluzzi

12 Aug 2024

Gendered narratives and cultural shifts: a qualitative study on decadal changes in community alcohol consumption

PONE-D-23-38278R3

Dear Dr. Wider,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Gabriel Caluzzi

Guest Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Gabriel Caluzzi

3 Sep 2024

PONE-D-23-38278R3

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Wider,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Gabriel Caluzzi

Guest Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0309378.s001.docx (16.1KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: with comments PONE-D-23-38278_R1_reviewer.pdf

    pone.0309378.s002.pdf (1.1MB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewer Comment Checklist 2.docx

    pone.0309378.s003.docx (20.9KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: review comments.pdf

    pone.0309378.s004.pdf (126.7KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewer Comment Checklist 3.docx

    pone.0309378.s005.docx (20.1KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10813061.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES