Abstract
Inositol pyrophosphates (PP-InsPs) are nutrient messengers whose cellular levels are precisely regulated. Diphosphoinositol pentakisphosphate kinases (PPIP5Ks) generate the active signaling molecule 1,5-InsP8. PPIP5Ks harbor phosphatase domains that hydrolyze PP-InsPs. Plant and Fungi Atypical Dual Specificity Phosphatases (PFA-DSPs) and NUDIX phosphatases (NUDTs) are also involved in PP-InsP degradation. Here, we analyze the relative contributions of the three different phosphatase families to plant PP-InsP catabolism. We report the biochemical characterization of inositol pyrophosphate phosphatases from Arabidopsis and Marchantia polymorpha. Overexpression of different PFA-DSP and NUDT enzymes affects PP-InsP levels and leads to stunted growth phenotypes in Arabidopsis. nudt17/18/21 knock-out mutants have altered PP-InsP pools and gene expression patterns, but no apparent growth defects. In contrast, Marchantia polymorpha Mppfa-dsp1ge, Mpnudt1ge and Mpvip1ge mutants display severe growth and developmental phenotypes and associated changes in cellular PP-InsP levels. Analysis of Mppfa-dsp1geand Mpvip1ge mutants supports a role for PP-InsPs in Marchantia phosphate signaling, and additional functions in nitrate homeostasis and cell wall biogenesis. Simultaneous elimination of two phosphatase activities enhanced the observed growth phenotypes. Taken together, PPIP5K, PFA-DSP and NUDT inositol pyrophosphate phosphatases regulate growth and development by collectively shaping plant PP-InsP pools.
Author summary
Organisms must maintain adequate levels of nutrients in their cells and tissues. One such nutrient is phosphorus, an essential building block of cell membranes, nucleic acids and energy metabolites. Plants take up phosphorus in the form of inorganic phosphate and require adequate phosphate levels to support their growth and development. It has been shown that plants and other eukaryotic organisms "measure" cellular phosphate levels using inositol pyrophosphate signaling molecules. The concentration of inositol pyrophosphates serves as a proxy for the cellular concentration of inorganic phosphate, and therefore inositol pyrophosphate synthesis and degradation must be tightly regulated. Here, we report that three different families of enzymes contribute to the degradation of inositol pyrophosphates in plants. Taken together, the different phosphatases shape cellular inositol pyrophosphate pools to regulate inorganic phosphate levels. Loss-of-function mutants of the different enzymes show altered nitrate levels and changes in cell wall architecture, suggesting that inositol pyrophosphates may regulate cellular processes beyond phosphate homeostasis.
Introduction
Inositol pyrophosphates (PP-InsPs) are small molecule nutrient messengers consisting of a densely phosphorylated myo-inositol ring and either one or more pyrophosphate groups [1]. PP-InsPs are ubiquitous in eukaryotes where they perform diverse signaling functions. Their central role in cellular inorganic phosphate (Pi) / polyphosphate (polyP) homeostasis is conserved among fungi [2–5], protozoa [6], algae [7], plants [8–13] and animals [14–17].
In plants grown under Pi-sufficient conditions, the PP-InsP isomer 1,5-InsP8 accumulates in cells and binds to SPX (Syg1 Pho81 XPR1) receptor proteins [10,12,11,3]. The ligand-bound receptor undergoes conformational changes [3,18], for example, allowing for the interaction with a family of PHOSPHATE STARVATION RESPONSE (PHR) transcription factors [19–23,3]. The coiled-coil oligomerization and Myb DNA-binding domains wrap around the SPX receptor, preventing PHRs from interacting with their target promoters. Under Pi starvation conditions, 1,5-InsP8 levels decrease, SPX–PHR complexes dissociate and the released transcription factors can oligomerize, bind promoters and regulate Pi starvation-induced (PSI) gene expression [11,24,13].
Cellular Pi homeostasis and 1,5-InsP8 levels are mechanistically linked. Therefore, understanding the regulation of PP-InsP biosynthesis and catabolism is of fundamental and of biotechnological importance. In plants, PP-InsPs are generated from phytic acid (InsP6) through a series of pyrophosphorylation steps catalyzed by inositol 1,3,4-trisphosphate 5/6-kinases (ITPKs) [12,25] and by the diphosphoinositol pentakisphosphate kinases (PPIP5K) VIH1/2 (also called VIP1/2) [26,27,9,10]. Consistent with the function of 1,5-InsP8 as a nutrient messenger in Pi homeostasis and starvation responses, deletion of enzymes that disrupt the biosynthesis of InsP6 (IPK1 and IPK2β), 5-InsP7 (ITPK1) or 1,5-InsP8 (VIH1/VIH2), results in altered Pi starvation responses in Arabidopsis [8,28,29,9,10,12]. vih1 vih2 loss-of-function mutants lack 1,5-InsP8, display constitutive Pi starvation responses and a severe seedling lethal phenotype, which can be partially rescued by additional deletion of PHR1 and its paralog PHL1 [9].
PP-InsP catabolic enzymes have been identified in the C-terminus of PPIP5Ks [30], and as stand-alone enzymes in the plant and fungal atypical dual specificity phosphatase (PFA-DSPs) [31] and the NUDIX (NUcleoside DIphosphates associated to moiety-X) hydrolase families (hereafter NUDT) [32–34] families. Fission yeast PPIP5K Asp1 has been characterized as an inositol 1-pyrophosphate phosphatase that releases 5-InsP7 from 1,5-InsP8 and InsP6 from 1-InsP7 [35,36].
The fungal PFA-DSPs ScSiw14 and SpSiw14 are metal-independent cysteine phosphatases capable of hydrolyzing 1-InsP7, 5-InsP7 and 1,5-InsP8 with a preference for 5-InsP7 [31,37,38]. The preferred substrate of the five PFA-DSPs in Arabidopsis is 5-InsP7 in the presence of Mg2+ ions [39] in vitro [40,41].
NUDIX hydrolases form a large family of enzymes that share a common fold and broad substrate specificity [42,43]. NUDT enzymes of the diadenosine and diphosphoinositol polyphosphate phosphohydrolase subfamily have been characterized as inositol pyrophosphate phosphatases: fungal Ddp1 [33] (YOR162w) and Aps1 [32,34] are able to hydrolyze different polyphosphate substrates, such as polyP, diadenosine polyphosphates (ApnA) and inositol pyrophosphates, with a moderate substrate preference for 1-InsP7 [32,34,44–48]. Among the 28 NUDIX enzymes present in Arabidopsis [42], AtNUDT13 has been characterized as an Ap6A phosphohydrolase [49].
PPIP5K, PFA-DSP and NUDT phosphatase mutants have been reported in fungi and in plants. Mutation of the catalytic histidine in the phosphatase domain of fission yeast PPIP5K Asp1 altered microtubule dynamics and vacuolar morphology [50,36]. Severe growth phenotypes have been reported for missense alleles leading to early stop mutations in the phosphatase domain of Asp1 [51]. In Arabidopsis, complementation of the seedling lethal phenotype of vih1-2 vih2-4 mutant plants with the full-length PPIP5K VIH2 containing a catalytically inactive phosphatase domain restored growth back to wild-type levels with only minor Pi accumulation defects [9]. Baker’s yeast PFA-DSP siw14Δ strains showed enhanced environmental stress responses [52] and elevated 5-InsP7 levels [4]. T-DNA insertion lines in the pfa-dsp1 locus had no apparent phenotypes and wild-type-like cellular PP-InsP levels [41]. Overexpression of AtPFA-DSP1 in Arabidopsis or in Nicotiana benthamiana reduced InsP7 pools [41]. Overexpression of AtPFA-DSP4, or of rice OsPFA-DSP1 and OsPFA-DSP2 resulted in altered drought and pathogen responses [53,54].
Genetic interaction studies between PPIP5Ks, PFA-DSPs and NUDIX enzymes have been performed in fungi. In baker’s yeast, siw14Δ vip1Δ and siw14Δ ddp1Δ contained higher cellular InsP7 levels when compared to the respective single mutants [31]. In fission yeast, neither the Asp1, Aps1 nor the Siw14 phosphatase activities were required for vegetative growth [37]. Importantly, aps1Δ asp1-H297A double mutants are lethal and this phenotype is dependent on 1,5-InsP8 synthesis by the PPIP5K Asp1 [55]. Similarly, aps1Δ siw14-C189S mutants are lethal, suggesting that combined 1-InsP7 and 5-InsP7 catabolism is essential in fission yeast [37].
The relative contributions of PPIP5K, PFA-DSP and NUDT inositol pyrophosphate phosphatases to plant PP-InsP catabolism remain to be characterized. Here, using a PP-InsP affinity reagent previously developed to identify PP-InsP interacting proteins in yeast [56] and in human cells [57], we isolate three PFA-DSP and three NUDT inositol pyrophosphate phosphatases from Arabidopsis and characterize their in vitro enzymatic properties and in planta gain- and loss-of-function phenotypes. Translating our findings to Marchantia polymorpha, we define loss-of-function phenotypes for PFA-DSP, NUDT and PPIP5K phosphatases and investigate their genetic interaction.
Results
AtPFA-DSP1 and AtNUDT17 are inositol pyrophosphate phosphatases
To identify putative inositol pyrophosphate phosphatases in Arabidopsis we prepared protein extracts from 2-week-old seedlings grown under Pi-sufficient or Pi starvation conditions and performed affinity pull-downs with resin-immobilized 5PCP-InsP5, a non-hydrolyzable PP-InsP analog [56] (S1A Fig, see Methods). Different InsP/PP-InsP kinases including ITPK1/2 [25] and VIH1/2 [27,26,9,10] specifically bound to 5PCP-InsP5 but not to Pi control beads (S1B Fig). Six putative PP-InsP phosphatases were recovered, including AtPFA-DSP1, AtPFA-DSP2 and AtPFA-DSP4 as well as AtNUDT17, AtNUDT18 and AtNUDT21 (S1B Fig). We excluded several purple acid phosphatases from further analysis (S1B Fig), because they are likely cell wall-resident enzymes involved in Pi foraging [58]. Samples from Pi-starved and Pi-sufficient conditions all contained the different PP-InsP metabolizing enzymes, but their protein abundance was overall increased under Pi starvation.
We next tested whether AtPFA-DSP1/2/4 and AtNUDT17/18/21 are inositol pyrophosphate phosphatases in vitro (S1C Fig). Therefore, we expressed and purified recombinant AtPFA-DSP1 (residues 1–216) and AtNUDT17 (residues 23–163) and characterized their enzyme activities (see Methods, S2 Fig). We found that both AtPFA-DSP1 and AtNUDT17 are inositol pyrophosphate phosphatases. 5-InsP7 is the preferred substrate for both enzymes in vitro (see below, Figs 1A, 1B, and S2). Both enzymes do not require a metal co-factor for catalysis [31,45]. However, the conformational equilibrium of PP-InsPs can be modulated by metal cations [39] and hence we performed enzyme assays in the presence and absence of MgCl2 (Fig 1A and 1B). Taken together, AtPFA-DSP1 and AtNUDT17 are bona fide inositol pyrophosphate phosphatases.
Overexpression of AtPFA-DSPs or AtNUDTs results in stunted growth and altered PP-InsP pools
Arabidopsis AtPFA-DSP1/2/4 and AtNUDT17/18/21 group with their respective Siw14 and Ddp1 orthologs from yeast in phylogenetic trees, respectively (S1D–S1G Fig). We next used clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR/Cas9) gene editing [59] to generate nudt17/18/21 triple loss-of-function mutants (S3 Fig), and AtNUDT17, AtNUDT18 and AtNUDT21 overexpression (OX) lines (Figs 1C, S4A, and S4B). We also generated ubiquitin 10 promoter-driven AtPFA-DSP1, AtPFA-DSP2 and AtPFA-DSP4 OX lines, but were unable to isolate higher order pfa-dsp1/2/4 mutants (Figs 1C, S4A, and S4B). nudt17/18/21 loss-of-function mutants and AtNUDT17, AtNUDT18 or AtNUDT21 OX lines showed no severe growth phenotypes (Figs 1A and S4A). Overexpression of either AtPFA-DSP1, AtPFA-DSP2 or AtPFA-DSP4 resulted in stunted growth phenotypes (Figs 1C, S4A, and S4B). AtPFA-DSP2 OX and AtNUDT17 OX lines both exhibited reduced rosette areas, which positively correlated with the protein expression level in the respective independent T3 line (Fig 1D and 1E). Overexpression of AtPFA-DSP1 in Arabidopsis has previously been associated with a reduction in cellular InsP7 pools [41]. We therefore quantified cellular PP-InsP levels by capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry in our different transgenic lines [60,61]. We found InsP6 levels in AtPFA-DSP2 OX and AtNUDT17 OX to be similar to wild type, while nudt17/18/21 plants had twice as much InsP6 (Fig 1F). AtPFA-DSP2 OX lines showed reduced levels of 5-InsP7 and 1,5-InsP8, in agreement with the inositol 5-pyrophosphate phosphatase activity of this enzyme in vitro (Fig 1A, 1B and 1F). Consistent with our biochemical assays, AtNUDT17 OX lines also showed reduced 5-InsP7 and 1,5-InsP8 levels (Fig 1A, 1B and 1F). Elevated levels of 1-InsP7 were observed in nudt17/18/21 plants (Fig 1F). With the exception of inositol pentakisphosphate (InsP5), which was higher in AtPFA-DSP2 OX and AtNUDT17 OX compared to wild type, the pools of other inositol phosphates were largely unchanged in our different genotypes (S5 Fig). AtNUDT17, AtNUDT18 and AtNUDT21 are expressed at seedling stage as concluded from the analysis of promoter::β-glucuronidase (GUS) fusions (Fig 2A).
Our reporter lines showed that expression of all three NUDT genes as well as AtPFA-DSP2 and AtPFA-DSP4 is up-regulated under Pi starvation conditions (Fig 2A). Consistent with this, RNA-seq experiments comparing 2-week-old Col-0 seedlings grown in Pi sufficient vs. starvation conditions showed elevated transcript levels for AtPFA-DSP1/2/4 and for AtNUDT17 under Pi starvation (Fig 2B). We therefore quantified cellular Pi levels in our transgenic lines and found that similar to previously reported vih1 vih2 [9] loss-of-function and constitutively active PHR1 [11] alleles, AtPFA-DSP2 OX and AtNUDT17 OX but not nudt17/18/21 plants overaccumulate Pi in phosphate-sufficient growth conditions, when compared to the Col-0 control (Fig 2C). We hypothesized that Pi overaccumulation in AtPFA-DSP2 OX and in AtNUDT17 OX may be caused by reduced 1,5-InsP8 pools (Fig 1F), which in turn may lead to a constitutive activation of PHR1/PHL1 transcription factors [3,9,11,13]. We performed additional RNA-seq analyses and found that several conserved PSI marker genes such as AtPPsPase1 (AT1G73010), AtSPX1 (AT5G20150), AtSPX3 (AT2G45130), AtIPS1 (AT3G09922) and AtPHT1;5 (AT2G32830) were strongly up-regulated in AtPFA-DSP2 OX and to a lesser extent in AtNUDT17 OX lines (Fig 2D and 2E). Several PSI marker genes are repressed in the nudt17/18/21 knock-out line (Fig 2E). Notably, we also observed induction of nitrate transporters in AtPFA-DSP2 OX and in AtNUDT17 OX plants (Fig 2E). Taken together, AtPFA-DSP1/2/4 or AtNUDT17/18/21 overexpression can alter PP-InsP pools and Pi starvation responses.
Identification of PFA-DSP and NUDT inositol pyrophosphate phosphatases in Marchantia
Characterization of our nudt17/18/21 triple mutant revealed no obvious visual or molecular phenotypes (Fig 1), suggesting that other members of the large Arabidopsis NUDIX gene family [42] may have redundant inositol pyrophosphate phosphatase activities. Indeed, biochemical analysis of AtNUDT13 (residues 1–202), which was previously characterized as an Ap6A phosphohydrolase [49], revealed robust inositol 1- and 5-pyrophosphate phosphatase activity, that exceeded that observed for AtNUDT17 (S2B and S2C Fig).
To overcome the potential genetic redundancies within the Arabidopsis PFA-DSP and NUDIX enzyme families, we sought to identify bona fide inositol pyrophosphate phosphatases in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. Using phylogenetic trees derived from multiple sequence alignments, we identified Mp3g10950 (https://marchantia.info, hereafter MpPFA-DSP1) in the subtree containing the Arabidopsis PFA-DSPs and ScSiw14 (S1D Fig). Similarly, Mp5g06600 (MpNUDT1) clusters with AtNUDT17, AtNUDT18, AtNUDT21 and with yeast Ddp1 (S1E Fig). We expressed and purified recombinant M. polymorpha MpPFA-DSP1 (residues 4–171) and MpNUDT1 (18–169) and evaluated their inositol pyrophosphate phosphatase activities (S6 Fig). MpPFA-DSP1 is a specific inositol 5-pyrophosphate phosphatase with a substrate preference for 5-InsP7 over 1,5-InsP8 (Figs 3A, 3B, and S6). Mutation of the catalytic Cys105 to alanine rendered MpPFA-DSP1 inactive (Figs 3B and S6). In contrast to AtNUDT17 or AtNUDT13 (Figs 1B and S2C), MpNUDT1 is an inositol 1-pyrophosphate phosphatase that cleaves 1-InsP7, an activity that depends on the catalytic Glu79 (Figs 3A, 3B, and S6). In conclusion, MpPFA-DSP1 and MpNUDT1 are specific inositol pyrophosphate phosphatases in Marchantia.
Deletion of MpPFA-DSP1, MpNUDT1 or MpVIP1 alters cellular PP-InsP level, growth and development
Next, we generated Mppfa-dsp1ge (nomenclature according to [62]) and Mpnudt1ge knockout mutants using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in M. polymorpha Tak-1 (Takaragaike-1) background (S7 Fig). For comparison, we also generated a Mpvip1ge (Mp8g06840) loss-of-function mutant, targeting the only PPIP5K gene in M. polymorpha (S7 Fig). 4-week-old Mppfa-dsp1ge plants grown from gemmae exhibited a vertical thallus growth phenotype, a decreased thallus surface area, increased rhizoid mass and reduced number of gemma cups, when compared to Tak-1 (Fig 3C and 3D). Mpvip1ge mutants displayed similar phenotypes, while two independent CRISPR/Cas9 knockout alleles of Mpnudt1ge (S7 Fig) had only mild growth phenotypes (Fig 3C and 3D). In time course experiments, Mppfa-dsp1ge, Mpnudt1ge and Mpvip1ge showed significantly reduced thallus surface areas (Fig 3E). Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpvip1ge but not Mpnudt1ge mutants had a strongly reduced number of gemma cups (Fig 3F). Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpvip1ge mutants showed increased rhizoid mass compared to Tak-1 (Fig 3D). Taken together, deletion of MpPFA-DSP1, MpNUDT1 or MpVIP1 affects growth and development in M. polymorpha, with the Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpvip1ge mutants having rather similar phenotypes.
Quantification of PP-InsP levels in Tak-1 revealed that M. polymorpha contains levels of 1-InsP7, 5-InsP7, 1,5-InsP8 comparable to those found in Arabidopsis (Figs 3G and 1F), as well as the recently reported 4/6-InsP7 isomer [12] (Fig 3G). Deletion of the PPIP5K MpVIP1 increases cellular 5-InsP7 pools, while decreasing 1,5-InsP8 levels, consistent with the enzymatic properties of the PPIP5K kinase domain [63] (Fig 3G). Mppfa-dsp1ge mutants show elevated 5-InsP7 pools and wild-type-like 1,5-InsP8 levels (Fig 3G). Mpnudt1ge lines show an increase for 1-InsP7 consistent with the preferred in vitro substrate of MpNUDT1 (Fig 3A, 3B and 3G). 1,5-InsP8 levels are higher in Mpnudt1ge when compared to Tak-1 (Fig 3G). None of the mutants affected the levels of 4/6-InsP7, suggesting that its biosynthesis/catabolism may not be catalyzed by MpVIP1, MpPFA-DSP1 or MpNUDT1 in M. polymorpha (Fig 3G). All mutants contained somewhat reduced levels of InsP6 (Fig 3G). InsP3 levels were reduced in Mppfa-dsp1ge, while the pools of other inositol phosphates were similar to Tak-1 (S8A Fig). Combined, Marchantia VIP1, PFA-DSP1 and NUDT1 are bona fide PP-InsP metabolizing enzymes in vitro and their genetic deletion alters PP-InsP pools in planta.
MpPFA-DSP1, MpNUDT1 and MpVIP1 contribute to Pi homeostasis in Marchantia
Arabidopsis vih1 vih2 mutants with reduced 1,5-InsP8 pools overaccumulate cellular Pi [9,11]. Consistently, Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpnudt1ge plants with elevated 1,5-InsP8 levels (Fig 3G) have associated lower Pi pools (Fig 4A). Our Mpvip1ge mutant has lower 1,5-InsP8 concentrations (Fig 3G) but Pi levels were not significantly different from the Tak-1 control (Fig 4A). RNA-seq analysis comparing Tak-1 plants grown under Pi-sufficient vs. Pi-starved conditions revealed that only MpNUDT1 expression is repressed under Pi starvation (Fig 4B). We could not detect proMpPFA-DSP1 or proMpNUDT1 promoter activity in promoter::GUS fusions, whereas proMpVIP1 showed a robust signal under both Pi-sufficient and Pi starvation conditions (S9 Fig). We compared Tak-1 plants grown under Pi-sufficient and Pi-starved conditions by RNA-seq to define PSI marker genes (Fig 4C), some of which are orthologs of the known PSI genes in Arabidopsis and in other plant species [64]. Next, we analyzed PSI marker gene transcript levels in our Mppfa-dsp1ge, Mpnudt1ge and Mpvip1ge mutants with Tak-1 grown under Pi sufficient conditions. We found that MpSPX (Mp1g27550) transcript levels were decreased in Mppfa-dsp1ge and in Mpvip1ge. MpPHO1;H4 (Mp4g19710) levels were decreased in Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpvip1ge and increased in Mpnudt1ge (Fig 4D). Pi transporter MpPHT1;4 (Mp2g20620) transcript levels are higher in our Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpvip1ge mutants when compared to Tak-1 (Fig 4D). Taken together, these experiments support a function for PP-InsPs in M. polymorpha Pi homeostasis, with the Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpvip1ge mutants showing similar gene expression patterns (Fig 4E). However, manually curated gene ontology analyses of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) revealed that PSI genes only represent a small pool of the total DEGs (Fig 4E).
Cell wall composition is altered in Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpvip1ge mutants
The large number of DEGs unrelated to Pi homeostasis prompted us to investigate other pathways potentially affected by the altered PP-InsP levels in Mppfa-dsp1ge, Mpnudt1ge and Mpvip1ge. We selected metal ion and cell wall homeostasis for further analysis (Fig 4E). Several metal ion transporters, metallothioneins and oxidoreductases are differentially expressed in our PP-InsP enzyme mutants (S10A Fig), but we did not observe unique, ion-specific differences in the ionomic profiles of Mppfa-dsp1ge, Mpnudt1ge and Mpvip1ge mutants compared to Tak-1 (S10B and S10C Fig). Rather, Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpvip1ge appear to contain slightly elevated concentrations of various mono- and divalent cations, including potassium, magnesium, calcium, zinc and molybdenum (S10B and S10C Fig).
The largest set of DEGs in our Marchantia RNA-seq experiments maps to cell wall related genes, particularly to a large number of class III peroxidases (Fig 5A) [65]. Notably, AtPFA-DSP2 OX lines also show altered gene expression patterns for many cell wall related genes, including peroxidases (Fig 5B). High peroxidase activity has been previously reported from M. polymorpha cell wall fractions [66], and therefore we investigated cell wall related phenotypes in our different mutants. Ruthenium red-stained transverse cross sections of 3-week-old thalli revealed increased staining in the dorsal and ventral epidermides of Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpvip1ge mutants, when compared to Tak-1 (Fig 5C and 5D), indicating increased acidic pectin levels in these two mutants. Fluorol yellow staining for lipidic compounds such as suberin or cutin also showed strong signals in the dorsal and ventral epidermal layers, while nile red staining showed a reduced signal in the parenchymatous cells (Fig 5D), suggesting that the Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpvip1ge mutants may contain higher levels of polyester cell wall polymers in the epidermis. In contrast, Renaissance SR2200 (which stains cellulose, hemicellulose and callose) revealed a uniform staining pattern across all mutants analyzed (Fig 5D), indicating that only specific cell wall components are altered in our Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpvip1ge lines. Taken together, our transcriptomic and histological analyses reveal cell wall composition changes in the Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpvip1ge epidermal layers.
Deletion of the VIP1 phosphatase domain in Mppfa-dsp1ge affects plant growth and nitrogen accumulation
Based on the similar growth phenotypes, PP-InsP pools, gene expression changes and cell wall defects of our Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpvip1ge mutants, we next performed genetic interaction studies between MpPFA-DSP1 and MpVIP1. Since MpVIP1 is a bifunctional enzyme with both PP-InsP kinase and phosphatase activity, we targeted the C-terminal histidine acid phosphatase domain (PD) in MpVIP1 by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing. The resulting Mpvip1Δpdge mutant lacks the C-terminal phosphatase domain while retaining the N-terminal PPIP5K kinase domain (Figs 6A and S7). We also isolated a Mppfa-dsp1ge Mpvip1Δpdge double mutant (Fig 6A). Notably, we could not recover Mpnudt1ge Mppfa-dsp1ge or Mpnudt1ge Mpvip1Δpdge double mutants, potentially indicating that these mutant combinations are not viable, as in yeast [37,55]. 4-week-old Mpvip1Δpdge plants grown from gemmae had reduced thallus surface areas when compared to Tak-1 (Fig 6B). Thallus size is reduced further in the Mppfa-dsp1ge Mpvip1Δpdge double mutant, suggesting that inositol 1- and 5-pyrophosphate phosphatase activities are required for M. polymorpha growth and development (Fig 6A and 6B). Mppfa-dsp1ge Mpvip1Δpdge plants displayed a large increase in rhizoid mass and failed to develop gemma cups (Fig 6C and 6D).
It has been previously reported that SPX domains are regulators of nitrate signaling in rice and in Arabidopsis [67–69]. Therefore, we quantified nitrate levels in 4-week-old plants grown on regular B5 medium (see Methods). Under these nitrate-sufficient growth conditions, Mppfa-dsp1ge, Mpnudt1ge and Mppfa-dsp1ge Mpvip1Δpdge accumulate nitrate to higher levels compared to Tak-1, with the double mutant having the strongest effect (Fig 6E). This suggests, that PP-InsPs may affect nitrate homeostasis in M. polymorpha, although it is unclear which PP-InsP isomer may be involved (Figs 3G and 6E). Notably, the Mppfa-dsp1ge, Mpnudt1ge and Mppfa-dsp1ge Mpvip1Δpdge mutants accumulate less Pi compared to Tak-1, when grown under Pi sufficient conditions (Fig 6F, compare Fig 4A). Taken together, the Mppfa-dsp1ge Mpvip1Δpdge double mutant phenotypes suggests that inositol 1- and 5-pyrophosphate phosphatase activities regulate M. polymorpha growth and development.
Discussion
Important physiological functions for inositol pyrophosphates in Arabidopsis have been highlighted by analysis of ITPK and PPIP5K loss-of-function mutants [9,10,12,25,27]. Genetic, quantitative biochemical and structural evidence support a role for the 1,5-InsP8 isomer as an essential nutrient messenger in Arabidopsis Pi homeostasis [3,9–11,13], similar to that described in yeast [4] and human [15]. Under Pi sufficient growth conditions, high cellular ATP/ADP ratios favor 1,5-InsP8 biosynthesis by activating the PPIP5K kinase domain [14,9]. At the same time, cellular Pi acts as an inhibitor of the PPIP5K histidine acid phosphatase domain, resulting in a net accumulation of the 1,5-InsP8 nutrient messenger [14,9]. Under Pi starvation conditions, ATP and Pi levels decrease, inhibiting the kinase and stimulating the inositol 1-pyrophosphate phosphatase activity of PPIP5Ks [14,9]. However, plants expressing kinase-active and phosphatase-dead versions of AtVIH2 did not show Pi homeostasis-related phenotypes [9], suggesting that other PP-InsP phosphatases may be involved in 1,5-InsP8 catabolism in Arabidopsis.
Here, we characterize three PFA-DSP-type and three NUDIX-type enzymes as inositol pyrophosphate phosphatases in Arabidopsis. Previous studies [40,41] and our biochemical analysis reveal AtPFA-DSPs as specific inositol 5-pyrophosphate phosphatases. As in the case of yeast Siw14 [31], 5-InsP7 is the preferred in vitro substrate for AtPFA-DSP1 in the presence and absence of Mg2+ ions [40] (Figs 1A, 1B, and S2). The MpPFA-DSP1 ortholog shares the substrate specificity and overall activity with the Arabidopsis enzyme (Figs 3B and S6). The specific activities are ~1400 nmol min-1 mg-1 and ~2600 nmol min-1 mg-1 for AtPFA-DSP1 and MpPFA-DSP1, respectively (Fig 1B and 3B). The specific activities for the phosphorylation of 5-InsP7 to 1,5-InsP8 by AtVIH2 and HsPPIKP2 were estimated to be ~ 400 nmol min-1 mg-1 [9,63]. ITPK1 generates 5-InsP7 from InsP6 with a specific activity of ~20 nmol min-1 mg-1 [12]. This suggests that in tissues expressing AtPFA-DSP1, or AtPFA-DSP2/4 (Fig 2A), 5-InsP7 catabolism may impact 1,5-InsP8 biosynthesis.
We found that 5-InsP7 is the preferred in vitro substrate for AtNUDT17 (Figs 1A, 1B, and S2). However, the enzyme is much less active compared to AtPFA-DSP1 (Fig 1A and 1B). In contrast to AtNUDT17, MpNUDT1 strongly prefers 1-InsP7 as substrate in vitro and in vivo (Fig 3A, 3B and 3G). A preference for different pyrophosphorylated substrates has been previously described for yeast and human NUDIX enzymes [47,48]. The fact that AtNUDT13 can also hydrolyze 1- and 5-InsP7 (S2B Fig) suggests that we could recover some but not all PP-InsP phosphatases in our 5PCP-InsP5 interaction screen (S1A and S1B Fig) [56,57].
Overexpression of AtPFA-DSP1, AtPFA-DSP2 or AtPFA-DSP4 resulted in stunted growth phenotypes associated with a reduction in 5-InsP7 and 1,5-InsP8 levels (Figs 1C–1F and S4). Pi levels are elevated in AtPFA-DSP2 OX lines and PSI gene expression is strongly upregulated (Fig 2C and 2E). Since AtPFA-DSP1 and AtNUDT17 have a similar substrate preference in vitro and in vivo (Fig 1B and 1F), we speculate that the weaker overexpression effects in our AtNUDT17 OX lines (Figs 1C and S4) are related to the lower enzyme activity of AtNUDT17 (Fig 1B). Consistent with our study, overexpression of AtPFA-DSP1 in tobacco and in Arabidopsis resulted in reduced InsP7 pools [41]. (Fig 1F).
Our nudt17/18/21 loss-of-function mutants are indistinguishable from wild type and show only minor changes in PP-InsP accumulation and repression of PSI gene expression (Figs 1C, 1F, 2D and 2E). Since all three NUDT enzymes are expressed at seedling stage (Fig 2A), we speculate that other NUDT family members such as AtNUDT13 (S2B and S2C Fig) may act redundantly with AtNUDT17/18/21 in PP-InsP catabolism. Although no loss-of-function phenotypes for NUDT enzymes were observed, their induction under Pi starvation conditions suggests that these PP-InsP phosphatases may contribute to Pi homeostasis in Arabidopsis (Fig 2A and 2B).
M. polymorpha contains 9 PFA-DSP and 20 NUDT genes. We were able to define loss-of-function phenotypes for Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpnudt1ge single mutants. Overall, both Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpnudt1ge show reduced thallus growth rates in time course experiments (Fig 3C and 3E). To our surprise, Mpvip1ge plants (originally generated as a control) shared the vertical thallus growth phenotype, a smaller thallus surface area, increased rhizoid mass, and reduced number of gemma cups with Mppfa-dsp1ge (Fig 3C–3F). Similar phenotypes have been reported previously for PIN auxin transporter overexpression lines, and for auxin response factor loss-of-function mutants in M. polymorpha [70,71]. Notably, loss-of-function mutants of the 5-InsP7 synthesizing ITPK1 kinase show altered auxin responses in Arabidopsis [72]. A InsP6 binding site has been previously identified in the auxin receptor AtTIR1 [73]. AtTIR1 has recently been shown to interact with AtITPK1, and thus may bind the AtITPK1 reaction product 5-InsP7 in planta [72]. Notably, 5-InsP7 levels are increased in our Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpvip1ge plants, which in turn may alter TIR1-mediated auxin responses (Fig 3G). However, our RNA-seq analyses did not reveal any major changes in the expression of auxin-regulated genes (Fig 4E). Changes in PP-InsP levels alter Pi homeostasis in Arabidopsis [9,12,41], and therefore we characterized PP-InsP concentrations and Pi starvation-related phenotypes in our different phosphatase loss-of-function mutants. 1- and 5-InsP7 levels are increased in Mppfa-dsp1ge mutants compared to Tak-1, while 1,5-InsP8 concentrations are only slightly increased (Fig 3G). Both Mpnudt1ge alleles overaccumulate 1-InsP7 and 1,5-InsP8 (Fig 3G). It is noteworthy, that not only PP-InsP levels, but also InsP6 pools are affected in some of our genotypes (Figs 1F and 3G). The overaccumulation of InsP6 in nudt17/18/21 plants (Fig 1F), or the reduced InsP6 levels in Mpvip1ge (Fig 3G), cannot be explained by altered PP-InsP catabolism or biosynthesis in these mutants alone, given the much higher levels of InsP6 compared to 1-InsP7, 5-InsP7 or 1,5-InsP8. How PP-InsP may affect InsP6 biosynthesis, transport or vacuolar storage remains to be investigated. Taken together, PFA-DSP and NUDT enzymes in Marchantia and in Arabidopsis contribute to PP-InsP catabolism.
We observed that in contrast to the Arabidopsis vih1 vih2 mutant [9], Mpvip1ge plants are viable (Fig 3C) and do not overaccumulate phosphate under Pi-sufficient growth conditions (Figs 4A and 6F). To our knowledge, MpVIP1 is a single-copy gene in M. polymorpha. The Mpvip1ge mutant contains lower levels of 1,5-InsP8 when compared to Tak-1 (Fig 3G). However, for several PSI marker genes identified in our RNA-seq experiments (Fig 4C, see also ref. [74]), we observed gene repression rather than constitutive activation in Mpvip1ge plants (Fig 4D). Consistent with this, Mpvip1ge phenocopies the Mppfa-dsp1ge mutant, which also has higher 5-InsP7 levels but wild type-like 1,5-InsP8 pools (Fig 3G), associated with PSI marker gene repression (Fig 4D). Deletion of the C-terminal histidine acid phosphatase in MpVIP1 (Mpvip1Δpdge) resulted in a reduced thallus size, similar to the Mpvip1ge and Mppfa-dsp1ge mutants (Fig 6A). This suggests that both the PPIP5K kinase and the histidine acid phosphatase activities contribute to this phenotype. In line with this, thallus size is further reduced in Mppfa-dsp1ge Mpvip1Δpdge double mutants (Fig 6A and 6B), suggesting that inositol 1- and 5-pyrophosphate phosphatase activities are required for normal growth and development in M. polymorpha. The Mpvip1ge and Mpvip1Δpdge mutants have wild-type-like Pi levels (Figs 4A and 6F). Therefore, our data do not support an isolated function for MpVIP1 as master regulator of Marchantia Pi homeostasis, unlike what has been reported in Arabidopsis [9,10]. We speculate that M. polymorpha may contain a second, sequence-divergent PP-InsP kinase able to synthesize 1,5-InsP8. In line with this, vip1Δ (the single PPIP5K in baker’s yeast) mutants still contain detectable levels of 1,5-InsP8 [4]. Linking Mppfa-dsp1ge, Mpnudt1ge or Mpvip1ge mutant phenotypes to isomer-specific PP-InsP level changes is complicated by compensatory changes in gene expression for other PP-InsP metabolizing enzymes, as indicated by our RNA-seq experiments (S8B Fig). Importantly, other PFA-DSP and NUDT-type inositol pyrophosphate phosphatases may exist in M. polymorpha.
Based on our RNA-seq analyses (Fig 4E), we additionally quantified cell wall-related phenotypes in the different mutant backgrounds (Fig 5C and 5D). Indeed, gene expression changes for many cell wall and carbohydrate-active enzymes could be associated with changes in cell wall composition in the Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpvip1ge mutants (Fig 5A and 5D). It has been previously reported that Pi starvation induces cellulose synthesis [75], and that ectopic overexpression of wheat VIH2 in Arabidopsis resulted in higher cellulose, arabinoxylan and arabinogalactan levels [76]. Similarly, extracellular Pi sensing has been associated with callose deposition in the root tip [77,78]. Our work suggests that altered PP-InsP levels in the Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpvip1ge mutants can induce changes in Marchantia cell wall composition.
In addition, our Mppfa-dsp1ge, Mpnudt1ge and Mppfa-dsp1ge Mpvip1Δpdge mutants show increased nitrate levels (Fig 6E). Consistent with this, nitrogen homeostasis-related genes are differentially expressed in Mppfa-dsp1ga, Mpnudt1ge and Mpvip1ge (Fig 4E), and nitrate transporters are induced in our AtPFA-DSP2 OX and in AtNUDT17 OX lines (Fig 2E). SPX inositol pyrophosphate receptors [3] have previously been implicated in nitrogen sensing and signaling [67–69,79,80]. A genetic interaction between VIP1 and nitrogen starvation has been reported in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [7]. Our PP-InsP catabolic mutants now link cellular PP-InsP pools to nitrate homeostasis (Figs 3G and 6D). Interestingly, alterations in nitrogen supply can affect cell wall organization and composition in several plant species [81–83], providing an alternative rationale for the cell wall defects observed in our Mppfa-dsp1ge and Mpvip1ge mutants (Fig 5). Future studies will elucidate the molecular mechanisms linking PP-InsPs with plant nitrogen homeostasis, and with cell wall architecture.
In conclusion, all three families of inositol pyrophosphate phosphatases present in plants contribute to the control of cellular PP-InsP pools, and changes in these pools regulate growth as well as phosphate, nitrogen and cell wall homeostasis in Marchantia.
Methods
Generation of stable trangenic A. thaliana lines
The nudt17/18/21 loss-of-function mutant was generated using clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR/Cas9) gene editing [59]. Guide-RNAs (gRNAs) were designed using the CRISPR-P v2 website (http://crispr.hzau.edu.cn/CRISPR2/) [84] (S1 Table). The final plasmid contained three gRNAs targeting AtNUDT17 (TAIR ID AT2G01670, https://www.arabidopsis.org/), AtNUDT18 (TAIR ID AT1G14860) and AtNUDT21 (TAIR ID AT1G73540) and Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 [59].
Overexpression from the ubiquitin10 (Ubi10, TAIR ID AT4G05320) promoter was achieved by cloning the coding sequences of AtNUDT17, AtNUDT18, AtNUD21, AtPFA-DSP1, AtPFA-DSP2, and AtPFA-DSP4 amplified from cDNA (using PCR primers shown in S1 Table) with either C-terminal Flag or enhanced GFP (eGFP) tags using Golden Gate cloning: Ubi10::AtNUDT17-Flag (AtNUDT17 OX), Ubi10::AtNUDT18-eGFP (AtNUDT18 OX), Ubi10::AtNUDT21-eGFP (AtNUDT21 OX), Ubi10::AtPFADSP1-eGFP (AtPFA-DSP1 OX), Ubi10::AtPFADSP2-Flag (AtPFA-DSP2 OX) and Ubi10::AtPFADSP4-eGFP (AtPFA-DSP4 OX).
Promoter::β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter genes were constructed by Golden Gate cloning. The corresponding promoter sequences (2kbp upstream of the ATG for proAtPFA-DSP1, proAtPFA-DSP4, proAtPFA-DSP4 and proAtNUDT17, 1.7 kbp for proAtNUDT18 and 1.3 kbp for proAtNUDT21) were synthesized by Twist Bioscience (https://www.twistbioscience.com). Constructs were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain pGV2260 and A. thaliana plants were transformed via floral dipping [85]. Transformed seedlings were selected by their Kanamycin resistance. Positive seedlings were transferred to soil and identified as unique transformation events. In the T2 generation, resistance to Kanamycine was tested again to ensure the single transgene insertion in the genome. In T3 generation, lines were tested to ensure that they were all homozygous. All analyses were performed using homozygous T3 lines.
Generation of stable transgenic M. polymorpha lines
Mppfa-dsp1ge, Mpnudt1ge, Mpvip1ge and Mpvip1Δpdge loss-of-function mutants were generated by CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. gRNAs were designed using Casfinder (https://marchantia.info/tools/casfinder/). Two target sequences were selected each and primers were synthesized (S1 Table). Primers included forward 5’ CTCG- 3’ and reverse 5’ AAAC- 3’ overhangs, respectively. Annealed primers were cloned into a pMpGE_En03 (Addgene #71535), plasmid digested with BsaI using T4 ligase (NEB). The gRNAs were subcloned into binary vector pMpGE010 (Addgene #71536) containing the Cas9 enzyme and a Hygromycin resistance gene as selection marker by Gatway Cloning, as desribed [86]. The final plasmids were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3001 and plant transformations were done using the regenerated thallus protocol [87]. Transgenic lines were genotyped by PCR using KOD polymerase (Merck) and Sanger sequencing, using primers flanking the target regions. We selected lines bearing insertions or deletions that lead to frame shifts and early stop codons. The Mppfa-dsp1ge Mpvip1Δpdge double mutant was generated by retransforming Mppfa-dsp1ge with the gRNAS used to generate the Mpvip1Δpdge in plasmid pMpGE011 (Addgene #71537) providing a Chlorsulfuron resistance marker.
Plant material
Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Col-0, nudt17/18/21, AtPFA-DSP1, 2 or 4 OX, and AtNUDT17, 18 or 21 OX lines, and the previously reported phr1 phl1 [20], vih1 vih2 phr1 phl1 [9], and pho2-1 [88] lines were gas sterilized, and after 2 d of stratification on ½MS (1.4 g/L MS basal salt mixture, 0.1 g/L MES, pH 5.7, plant agar = 8 g/L) grown for one week at 22°C and in 18 h / 6h light / dark cycles. Seedlings were transferred to soil and for rosette size quantification images were taken from 3-week-old plants. Wild type and CRISPR/Cas9-gene edited Marchantia polymorpha plants were Takaragaike-1 (Tak-1) males [87]. Plants were asexually maintained and propagated through gemmae growth on ½ Gamborg B5 medium (Sigma) adjusted to pH 5.5 with KOH, under constant LED-source white light (60 μmol/m2/s) at 22°C on 90 mm square Petri dishes (Greiner) containing 0.8% (w/v) plant cell culture agar (Huber lab).
5PCP-InsP5 pull-down assay
Pull-down assays were performed with either resin-immobilized 5PCP-InsP5 or Pi, as previously described [56]. Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Col-0 seeds were germinated in 1/2MS agar plates for 5 d and transferred to liquid ½MS medium (containing 1% [w/v] sucrose) in the presence of 0.2 μM (-Pi) or 1 mM (+Pi) K2HPO4/KH2PO4 (pH 5.7) for 10 d (S1A Fig). Seedlings were collected, pat dry, frozen and ground to a fine powder in liquid N2. For each sample, 6–10 g of fresh tissue were incubated for 1 h on ice with a 1:3 ratio of extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10% [v/v] glycerol, 5 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 0.5% [v/v] IGEPAL CA-630, 1 tablet of plant protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche] and 1 mM PMSF), with gentle shaking. Samples were then centrifuged at 16,000 x g for 20 min at 4°C, the supernatants were then filtered using Miracloth (Merck) and transferred to new Eppendorf tubes. Protein concentrations were measured using the Bradford assay and samples were diluted to a final concentration of 5 mg/mL. For each sample, 150 μL of beads slurry [56] was added to a new tube. Beads were pulled down by brief centrifugation at 100 x g and at 4°C and then washed twice with cold extraction buffer. The washed beads were then added to the protein extracts and incubated for 3 h in the cold room with gentle shaking. Eppendorf tubes were centrifuged at 100 x g for 30 s at 4°C, washed three times with extraction buffer, and eluted in 30 μL of elution buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10% [v/v] glycerol, 5 mM DTT and 20 mM InsP6) for 30 min in cold room with gentle shaking. Tubes were centrifuged and the supernatant was collected. A second elution was performed with an incubation of 30 μL of elution buffer overnight in the cold room with gentle shaking. The supernatant of this elution was collected and the two elutions were pooled. The remaining beads present in the eluate were removed by passing it through a Micro Bio-Spin chromatography column (Bio-Rad). 20 μL of 4x Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad) was added, and samples were incubated at 95°C for 5 min. 10 μL of each sample was analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by silver staining, the remaining sample was loaded on a 12% mini polyacrylamide gel, migrated about 2 cm and stained by Coomassie. Gel lanes between 15–300 kDa were excised into 5–6 pieces and digested with sequencing-grade trypsin [89]. Extracted tryptic peptides were dried and resuspended in 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid, 2% (v/v) acetonitrile.
Data-dependent LC-MS/MS analyses of samples were carried out on a Fusion Tribrid Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) interfaced through a nano-electrospray ion source to an Ultimate 3000 RSLCnano HPLC system (Dionex). Peptides were separated on a reversed-phase custom packed 45 cm C18 column (75 μm ID, 100Å, Reprosil Pur 1.9 um particles, Dr. Maisch, Germany) with a 4–76% acetonitrile gradient in 0.1% formic acid (total time was 65 min). Full MS survey scans were performed at 120’000 resolution. A data-dependent acquisition method controlled by Xcalibur software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used that optimized the number of precursors selected (“top speed”) of charge 2+ to 5+ while maintaining a fixed scan cycle of 1.5 or 3.0 s. Peptides were fragmented by higher energy collision dissociation (HCD) with a normalized energy of 32%. The precursor isolation window used was 1.6 Th, and the MS2 scans were done in the ion trap. The m/z of fragmented precursors was then dynamically excluded from selection during 60 s.
MS data were analyzed using Mascot 2.6 (Matrix Science, London, UK) set up to search the Arabidopsis thaliana Araport11 database (version of July 1st, 2015, containing 50’164 sequences, downloaded from https://araport.org), and a custom contaminant database containing the most usual environmental contaminants and enzymes used for digestion (keratins, trypsin, etc). Trypsin (cleavage at K, R) was used as the enzyme definition, allowing 2 missed cleavages. Mascot was searched with a parent ion tolerance of 10 ppm and a fragment ion mass tolerance of 0.5 Da. Carbamidomethylation of cysteine was specified in Mascot as a fixed modification. Protein N-terminal acetylation and methionine oxidation were specified as variable modifications. Scaffold (version Scaffold 4.8.4, Proteome Software Inc., Portland, OR) was used to validate MS/MS based peptide and protein identifications. Peptide identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 90.0% probability by the Scaffold Local FDR algorithm. Protein identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 95.0% probability and contained at least 2 identified peptides. Protein probabilities were assigned by the Protein Prophet algorithm [90]. Proteins that contained similar peptides and could not be differentiated based on MS/MS analysis alone were grouped to satisfy the principles of parsimony. Proteins sharing significant peptide evidence were grouped into clusters.
Phylogenetic analysis
Protein multiple sequence alignments were generated with Clustal Omega [91], and phylogenetic trees were created using the neighbor-joining method [92] as implemented in SeaView [93].
Protein expression and purification
AtPFA-DSP11-215 (UniProt, https://www.uniprot.org/ ID Q9ZVN4), AtNUDT131-202 (UniProt ID Q52K88), AtNUDT1723-163 (UniProt ID Q9ZU95) and MpPFA-DSP14-171 (UniProt ID A0A2R6X497) expression constructs were amplified from cDNA. A synthetic gene for MpNUDT118-169 (UniProt ID A0A2R6W2U8) codon-optimized for expression in E. coli was obtained from Twist Bioscience. AtPFA-DSP11-215 was cloned into plasmid pMH-MBP, which provides tobacco etch virus protease (TEV) cleavable N-terminal 6xHis and maltose binding protein tags. AtNUDT131-202, AtNUDT1723-163 and MpPFA-DSP14-171 were cloned into pMH-HT, providing a TEV-cleavable N-terminal 6xHis tag. MpNUDT118-169 was cloned into plasmid pMH-HC, providing a non-cleavable C-terminal 6xHis tag. Plasmids were transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) RIL cells. For protein expression, cells were grown in terrific broth medium at 37°C until an OD600 nm ~ 0.6 and induced with 0.5 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and grown at 16°C for ~16 h. For AtPFA-DSP1, AtNUDT13 and AtNUDT17, protein expression was achieved by autoinduction. Cells were grown in terrific broth medium supplemented with lactose at 37°C until OD600 nm ~ 0.6–0.8 and then at 16°C for 24 h. All cell pellets were harvested by centrifugation at 4,500 x g for 45 min at 4°C. AtPFA-DSP1, AtNUDT13 and AtNUDT17 were resuspended in buffer A (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, Dnase I and cOmplete™ protease inhibitor cocktail [Merck]), MpPFA-DSP1 and MpNUDT1 were resuspended in buffer B (50 mM K2HPO4/KH2PO4 pH 7.8, 500 mM NaCl, 0.4% tween, 10 mM imidazole, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol [BME], cOmplete™ protease inhibitor cocktail [Merck]) and disrupted by sonication. Cell suspension was centrifuged at 16,000 x g for 1 h at 4°C, the supernatant was filtered through a 0.45 μm PVDF filter (Millipore) and then loaded onto an Ni2+ affinity column (HisTrap HP 5 mL; Cytvia) pre-equilibrated in buffer A. The column was washed with 5 column volumes of buffer A or B, respectively and fusion proteins were eluted with buffer A or B supplemented with 500 mM imidazole pH 8.0. Cleavage of the tag was performed, where applicable, by overnight incubation with TEV (1:50 ratio) at 4°C during dialysis in buffer C (20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl and 2 mM BME). The 6xHis-tagged TEV and the cleaved affinity tag were removed by a second Ni2+ affinity step (HisTrapExcel 5 mL; Cytvia). All samples were purified to homogeneity by size exclusion chromatography in buffer C (20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl and 2 mM BME), on a Superdex 200 pg HR16/60 column (Cytvia) in the case of AtPFA-DSP1, AtNUDT13 and AtNUDT17, on a Superdex 200 pg HR10/30 (Cytvia) in the case of MpPFA-DSP1 and on a Superdex 75 pg HR26/60 (Cytvia) in the case of MpNUDT1. Purified proteins were snap frozen in liquid N2 and used for biochemical assays. Mutations were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis and the mutant proteins were purified as described for the wild type.
Enzyme activity assays
PP-InsP phosphatase assays were performed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR). Reactions containing 100 μM of the respective [13C6]-labeled PP-InsP in 50 mM HEPES pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl, 1mM DTT, 0.2 mg/mL BSA and D2O to a total volume of 600 μL were prepared. Reactions were supplemented with 0.5 mM MgCl2 where indicated. Reaction mixtures were pre-incubated at 37°C and the reaction was started by adding the respective amount of enzyme; AtPFA-DSP1 (20 nM final concentration for 1-InsP7, 7 nM for 5-InsP7, 10 nM for 1,5-InsP8), 1 μM of AtNUDT17, 50 nM of AtNUDT13, MpPFA-DSP1 (350 nM for 1-InsP7, 200 nM for 5-InsP7, 250 nM for 1,5-InsP8), 2 μM for MpPFA-DSP1C105A, MpNUDT1 (250 nM for 1-InsP7, 100 nM for 5-InsP7, 250 nM for 1,5-InsP8) or 2 μM MpNUDT1E79A. Reactions were monitored continuously at 37°C using a NMR pseudo-2D spin-echo difference experiment. The relative intensity changes of the C2 peaks of the respective PP-InsPs as a function of reaction time were used for quantification [9,94]. To the raw data trend lines were added, following either a linear regression model or the first derivative of the equation of the one phase decay, normalized by the enzyme’s mass concentration.
Western blotting
~50 mg of leaf sample was harvested from A. thaliana plants and frozen into liquid N2 in a 2 mL Eppendorf tube with a metal bead. Samples were homogenized in a tissue lyzer (MM400, Retsch) for 30 s at a frequency of 30 Hz. Then, 50 μL of extraction buffer (100 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% [v/v] glycerol, 10 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM Sigma protease inhibitor and 1% [v/v] IPEGAL CA-630) were added to the tissue. Samples were mixed by vortexing, incubated for 20 min on ice and pelleted for 10 min at 20,000 x g at 4°C. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube. Protein concentrations were measured in triplicate using the Bradford protein assay in 96 well plates with 150 μL Bradford solution (Applied Chem.) and 2.5 μL of 10 times dilution of protein sample. Bovine Serum Albumine standards (0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1 mg/mL) were used as reference. After a 5 min incubation at room temperature (RT) in the dark, the absorbance was measured at 595 nm in a plate reader (Tecan Spark). Samples concentrations were then equalized, samples were boiled at 95°C for 5 min in SDS sample buffer, and 40 μg of protein were loaded to each lane of a 10% SDS-PAGE tris-glycine gel. Proteins were then transferred on a nitrocellulose membrane (0.45 μm, Cytiva) for 1 h and 100 V. After blocking for 1 h with TBS-T (Tris Buffer Saline with 0.1% Tween 20) containing 5% (w/v) milk powder (Roth) at RT, nitrocellulose membranes were incubated at RT for 2 h with anti-GFP (Miltenyi 130-091-833) or anti-Flag (Sigma A8592) antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase in TBS-T at 1:5,000 dilution. Finally, after 2 washes of 5 min with TBS-T, and one wash of 5 min with TBS, blots were detected using either SuperSignal™ West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Scientific) or BM Chemiluminescence western blotting substrate (POD; Merck) and photographic films (CL-XPosure Film, ThermoFisher). As loading control, RuBisCO was visualized using Ponceau red staining (0.1% [w/v] Ponceau red powder (Sigma) in 5% [v/v] acetic acid).
Rosette size and thallus size quantification
In the case of Arabidopsis, seedling were germinated and grown on 1/2MS plates for 1 week and then transferred to soil for an additional 2 weeks. 15 plants per genotype (1 plant per pot) were randomized on trays. Their rosette surface areas were extracted from vertically taken images using a machine-learning approach (Ilastik, https://www.ilastik.org/) to recognize the rosette leaves. Images were segmented in Ilastik and then analyzed with Fiji [95].
In the case of Marchantia, thallus surface areas were quantified from single plants grown from gemmae (1 gemmae per one round 90 mm petri dish) grown in ½B5 medium in time course experiments defined in the respective figure legend. Image analysis was performed as described for Arabidopsis.
PP-InsP quantification by CE-ESI-MS
Arabidopsis seedlings were grown on 1/2MS plates for 2 weeks and 150 mg of pooled seedling were prepared per genotype and technical replicate. Marchantia plants were grown as described above for 3 weeks and ~500 mg of fresh weight tissue was collected for each genotype and replicate. TiO2 beads (Titansphere Bulk Material Titansphere 5 μm, GL Sciences; 5 mg per sample) where washed with 1 mL ddH2O and pelleted at 3,500 x g for 1 min at 4°C. Beads were then washed in 1 mL of perchloric acid, pelleted again and then resuspended in 50 μL perchloric acid. Plant samples were snap frozen in liquid N2, homogenized by bead beating (4 mm steel beads in a tissue lyzer, MM400, Retsch), and immediately resuspended in 1 mL 1 M ice-cold perchloric acid. Samples were rotated for 15 min at 4°C and pelleted at 21,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C, the resulting supernatants were added to eppendorf tubes containing the TiO2 beads and mixed by vortexing. Samples were then rotated for 15 min at 4°C and pelleted at 21,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C. Beads were washed twice by resuspending in 500 μL cold 1 M perchloric acid, followed by centrifugation at 3,500 x g for 1 min at 4°C. For InsPs/PP-InsPs elution, beads were resuspended in twice 200 μL ~2.8% ammonium hydroxide, mixed by vortexing, rotated for 5 min and pelleted at 3,500 x g for 1 min. The two elution fractions were pooled, centrifuged at 21,000 x g for 5 min at 4°C and the supernatants were transferred to fresh tubes, and dried under vacuum evaporation for 70 min at 45–60°C. InsP/PP-InsP quantification was done utilizing an Agilent CE-QQQ system, comprising an Agilent 7100 CE, an Agilent 6495C Triple Quadrupole, and an Agilent Jet Stream electrospray ionization source, integrated with an Agilent CE-ESI-MS interface. A consistent flow rate of 10 μL/min for the sheath liquid (composed of a 50:50 mixture of isopropanol and H2O) was maintained using an isocratic Agilent 1200 LC pump, delivered via a splitter. Separation occurred within a fused silica capillary, 100 cm in length, with an internal diameter of 50 μm and an outside diameter of 365 μm. The background electrolyte (BGE) consisted of 40 mM ammonium acetate, adjusted to pH 9.08 with ammonium hydroxide. Before each sample run, the capillary underwent a flush with BGE for 400 seconds. Samples were injected for 15 seconds under a pressure of 100 mbar (equivalent to 30 nL). MS source parameters included a gas temperature set at 150°C, a flow rate of 11 L/min, a nebulizer pressure of 8 psi, a sheath gas temperature of 175°C, a capillary voltage of -2000V, and a nozzle voltage of 2000V. Additionally, negative high-pressure radio frequency (RF) and negative low-pressure RF were maintained at 70 and 40 V, respectively. The setting for multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) were as shown in S5B Fig. For the preparation of the internal standard (IS) stock solution, specific concentrations were employed: 8 μM [13C6] 2-OH-InsP5, 40 μM [13C6] InsP6, 2 μM [13C6] 1-InsP7, 2 μM [13C6] 5-InsP7, 1 μM [18O2] 4-InsP7 (specifically for the assignment of 4/6-InsP7), and 2 μM [13C6] 1,5-InsP8 [60,61,96]. These IS compounds were introduced into the samples to facilitate isomer assignment and quantification of InsPs and PP-InsPs. Each sample was supplemented with 5 μL of the IS stock solution, thoroughly mixed with 5 μL of the sample. Quantification of InsP8, 5-InsP7, 4/6-InsP7, 1-InsP7, InsP6, InsP5, InsP4 and InsP3 was carried out by spiking known amounts of corresponding heavy isotopic references into the samples. For InsP₃ and InsP4 isomers, the [13C₆] InsP₃ and [13C₆] InsP4 reference was prepared by incubating [13C₆] InsP₆ in ultrapure water at 100°C for 5 h. The assignment of InsP₃ isomers follows the method described by [97]. For normalization of lower InsPs, InsP5 was quantified using [13C₆] 2-OH InsP5 as the standard, based on 1-OH InsP5; for InsP4 [13C₆] InsP6 was used as standard, considering all isomers; and for InsP3 [13C₆] InsP6 was used as standard, accounting for Ins(1,2,3)P₃, Ins(1,2,6)P₃, and Ins(4,5,6)P₃. Note that absolute levels should not be compared directly. Following spiking, the final concentrations within the samples were as follows: 4 μM [13C6] 2-OH-InsP5, 20 μM [13C6] InsP6, 1 μM [13C6] 5-InsP7, 1 μM [13C6] 1-InsP7, 1 μM [18O2] 4-InsP7, and 0.5 μM [13C6] 1,5-InsP8 [94].
β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter assay
The β-glucuronidase (GUS) gene was used as a reporter of gene expression fused to promoters of AtPFA-DSP1, 2 and 4; AtNUDT17, 18 and 21, and MpDSP1, MpNUDT1 or MpVIP1. The previously reported proAtVIH1::GUS and proAtVIH2::GUS lines were used as controls [9]. 1.5–2 kbp regions upstream of the ATG were considered promoter sequences. Arabdiopsis seedling were germinated on ½MS medium (containing 1% [w/v] sucrose) and transferred after 1 week to ½MS plates containing 1% sucrose and either 0 (-Pi) or 1 mM (+Pi) K2HPO4/KH2PO4 (pH 5.7). 2-week-old seedlings were submerged in ice-cold 90% acetone solution for 20 min and rinsed with 0.5 mM K4Fe(CN)6, 0.5 mM K3Fe(CN)6, and 50 mM NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4 buffer pH 7.0. Samples were then incubated in staining solution (0.5 mM K4Fe(CN)6, 0.5 mM K3Fe(CN)6, 10 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mM X-Gluc, and 100 mM NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4 buffer pH 7.0) and vacuum infiltrated for 15 min. Samples were placed at 37°C for the period indicated in the respective figure legend. To stop the reaction, the staining solution was replaced with aqueous solution containing increasing amounts of ethanol (15, 30, 50, 70, 100% [v/v]) for 10 min each. Finally, the ethanol was gradually replaced by glycerol to a final concentration of 30% (v/v) before recording images in a binocular (Nikon SMZ18 equipped with a DS-Fi3 CMOS camera). In the case of Marchantia, plants from single gemmae were grown for 1 week on 1/2B5 medium and transferred to plates containing either 0 (-Pi) or 0.5 mM (+Pi) K2HPO4/KH2PO4 (pH 5.5). The same staining protocol was used as described for Arabidopsis.
RNA-seq analyses
2-week-old Arabdiopsis and Marchantia plants grown under Pi-sufficient or Pi-starvation conditions (as described in the β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter assay section). For each biological replicate, 3–4 plants were pooled and RNA was extracted using the RNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen). 100 ng of total RNA per sample determined using a Qubit fluorometer (Thermofisher). RNA quality control using 2100 Bioanalyzer system (Agilent Technologies), library preparation and sequencing were performed by the iGE3 Genomic Platform at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva (https://ige3.genomics.unige.ch/). Sequencing was performed with Novaseq 6000 machine from Illumina with 100 bp single-read output. Quality control of the reads and adaptor trimming were done with MultiQC [98]. Genomic and transcript annotation files of the Arabidopsis thaliana TAIR10 reference genome were downloaded from the TAIR database (https://www.arabidopsis.org/). In the case of Marchantia polymorpha, the v6.1 reference genome and annotation were downloaded from MarpolBase (https://marchantia.info/download/MpTak_v6.1/). For mapping the reads, HISAT2 [99] (v2.2.1 with only the -dta option in extra) and StringTie [100] (v2.2.1 with default options) were used. Ballgown [100] was used to re-assemble the different output files into a single tab-delimited file. Prior to further statistical analysis, counts were filtered to have at least 10 counts per gene in at least one sample. DESeq2 [101] (v3.17) with default options has been used in Rstudio (https://posit.co/download/rstudio-desktop/) to make pairwise comparison of the different genotype and growth conditions vs. the Col-0 (Arabidopsis) or Tak-1 (Marchantia) references, respectively. Gene ontology enrichment analyses were performed in Panther (https://www.pantherdb.org/), data visualization was done in R [102] packages ggplot2, dplyr, reshape2 and EnhancedVolcano.
Phosphate and nitrate quantification
Arabidopsis seedlings were germinated on ½MS supplemented with 1% (w/v) sucrose for one week and then transferred to ½MS agar plates supplemented with 1% (w/v) sucrose, containing either 0 mM Pi (-Pi), 1 mM KH2PO4/K2HPO4 (pH 5.7) or 2 mM Pi (+Pi). At 2 weeks, four seedlings were pooled, weighed, resuspended in 400 μL miliQ H2O in an Eppendorf tube and snap-frozen in liquid N2. Plants were homogenized using a tissue lyzer (MM400, Retsch) and then samples were thawed at 85°C for 15 min with orbital shaking and snap frozen again in liquid N2. Samples were thawed again at 85°C for 1 h with orbital shaking. Free inorganic phosphate concentrations were determined by a colorimetric molybdate assay [103]. The master mix for each sample contained 72 μL of ammonium molybdate solution (0.0044% [w/v] of ammonium molybdate tetra hydrate, 0.23% [v/v] of 18 M H2SO4), 16 μL of 10% (w/v) acetic acid and 12 μL of miliQ H2O. For each sample, 100 μL of the mix was incubated with 20 μL of each sample in a 96-wells plate. Standard curves obtained by diluting 100 mM Na2HPO4 solution to final concentrations of 2, 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.16 and 0.08 mM. Technical triplicates were done for the standards and duplicates for all samples. Plates were incubated for 1 h at 37°C and absorbance at 820 nm was measured using a Spark plate reader (Tecan).
In the case of Marchantia, plants were grown from gemmae for 1 week on ½B5 medium. Plants were then transferred to plates containing either 0 mM Pi (-Pi) or 0.5 mM KH2PO4/K2HPO4 (pH 5.5) (+Pi). One plant represents one biological replicate, samples were processed as described for Arabidopsis above.
Nitrate quantification were based on the Miranda colorimetric assay [104]. Marchantia plants were grown on ½B5 medium and processed as described above. Miranda solution (0.25% [w/v] vanadium III chloride, 0.1% [w/v] sulfanilamide and 0.1% [w/v] N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine in 0.5 M HCl) was prepared and 200 μL of the solution was mixed with 5 μL for each sample in a 96-wells plate. Standards were prepared by diluting KNO3 to final concentrations of 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.12 and 0.06 mM. Technical triplicates were done for standards and duplicate for all samples. Plates were incubated at 65°C for 2 h and the absorbance at 540 nm was measured using a Spark plate reader (Tecan).
Elemental quantifications
Plants were grown from gemmae as described above for 3 weeks on ½B5 medium. ~ 8 g of plant material was harvested for each genotype, rinsed in aqueous solution containing 10 mM EDTA for 10 min with gentle shaking. Samples were rinsed 3 times with milQ H2O for 5 min and dried at 65°C for 2 d. For the different ion quantifications samples were then split into 20 mg batches. Each batch was incubated overnight with 750 μL of nitric acid (65% [v/v]) and 250 μL of hydrogen peroxide (30% [v/v]). Next, samples were mineralized at 85°C for 24 h. Finally, milliQ H2O was added to each sample and the elemental quantifications were done using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES 5800, Agilent Technologies).
Marchantia histology
The portion of interest of the plant was sectioned and fixed in phosphate buffer pH 7.2 with 4% (w/v) formaldehyde, 0.25% (w/v) glutaraldehyde and 0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100; the fixation was done overnight at 4°C under agitation, after vacuum infiltration. Samples were then washed with phosphate buffer (2x15 min) and with H2O (2x10 min) before undergoing dehydration in a graded ethanol series (ethanol 30%, 50%, 70%, 90% and 100% with incubations respectively of 30 min, 2x30 min, 3x20 min, 2x30 min, 2x30 min and overnight at 4°C in the last bath of ethanol 100%). Technovit 7100 was prepared according to the manufacturer’s indications by supplementing it with Hardener I (product from the kit), and samples were progressively infiltrated by incubations in 3:1, 1:1 and 1:3 mixes ethanol:Technovit 7100 (each time 2 h under agitation at room temperature), before finally incubating in 100% Technovit 7100 for 2 h at room temperature (after vacuum infiltration) and for another 40 h at 4°C. Embedding was done in Technovit 7100 supplemented with 1/15 Hardener II and 1/25 polyethylene glycol 400; polymerization was done for 30 min at room temperature followed by 30 min at 60°C. Sectioning was performed with a Histocore AUTOCUT microtome (Leica) using disposable R35 blades and sections of 4 μm were deposited on SuperFrost slides.
For the ruthenium red staining, sections were incubated 1 min in 0.05% (w/v) ruthenium red in distilled H2O, extensively rinsed with distilled H2O, then incubated 1 minute in xylene and mounted in Pertex. For the fluorol yellow staining, sections were incubated 5 min in 0.01% (w/v) fluorol yellow in 50% ethanol, extensively rinsed with distilled H2O, washed with distilled H2O during 1 h with agitation and mounted in 50% (v/v) glycerol. For the Renaissance SR2200 staining, sections were incubated 1 min in 0.05% (v/v) Renaissance SR2200, extensively rinsed with distilled H2O, washed with distilled H2O during 1 h with agitation and mounted in phosphate buffer saline pH 7.4 (PBS) supplemented with 50% (v/v) glycerol. For the nile red staining, sections were incubated 3 min in 1 μg/ml nile red in PBS, washed 3 times for 5 min in H2O and mounted in 50% (v/v) glycerol.
Sections stained with ruthenium red were observed with a Leica DM6B widefield microscope equipped with a DMC5400 CMOS camera (used with binning 2x2) and a 20x Fluotar NA 0.55 air objective. Sections stained with fluorol yellow and Renaissance SR2200 were observed with a Leica TCS SP8 confocal system mounted on a DMi8 inverted microscope and in the following configuration: objective HC PL APO CS2 20x NA 0.75 IMM used with water immersion; sampling speed 400 Hz (fluorol yellow and Renaissance SR2200) or 600 Hz (nile red); pixel size 190 nm; pinhole 1.0 Airy units (fluorol yellow), 1.3 Airy units (nile red) or 1.5 Airy units (Renaissance SR2200); frame averaging 3 (fluorol yellow and Renaissance SR2200) or 2 (nile red). Fluorol yellow, nile red and Renaissance SR 2200 were excited at 488 nm, 552 nm and 405 nm respectively, and their fluorescence was collected by a HyD detector at gain 50% (fluorol yellow and Renaissance SR2200) or 10% (nile red) between 507 nm and 550 nm (fluorol yellow), between 610 nm and 670 nm (nile red) or between 420 nm and 480 nm (Renaissance SR2200). For a given dye, all images were acquired and post-processed identically.
Image processing was done using Fiji [95]. For ruthenium red pictures, tiling and stitching was done using the Leica LAS X Navigator tool. For fluorol yellow and nile red pictures, a Gaussian blur of radius 1 pixel (fluorol yellow) or 0.6 pixel (nile red) was applied, the images were downscaled using bicubic interpolation (from 4096x4096 to 1024x1024) and finally a rolling ball background subtraction was applied with a radius of 50 pixels; the look-up table NanoJ-Orange was used to display the images. For Renaissance SR2200 pictures, a Gaussian blur of radius 0.6 pixel was applied and the images were downscaled using bicubic interpolation. The look-up table NanoJ-Orange (fluorol yellow) and Green Fire Blue (nile red) was used to display the images.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank D. Furkert for providing the 5PCP-InsP5 resin, J. Santiago, M. Barberon and P. Rieu for critical reading of the manuscript, B. Petit and M. Docquier from the iGE3 Genomic Platform at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva for performing the different RNA-seq experiments, and the Service d’Analyses Multi-Elementaires (SAME) from the University of Montpellier, INRAE, CNRS, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France for elemental quantifications.
Data Availability
Raw data are available in Supporting Information, raw RNA-seq reads have been deposited with the NCBI sequence read archive (SRA; https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/subs/sra/), with identifiers PRJNA1090032, PRJNA1088982, PRJNA1089142 and PRJNA1090651.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council consolidator grant 818696 INSPIRE (to M.H.), by Swiss National Science Foundation Sinergia grant CRSII5_209412 (to M.H. and D.F.), by the International Research Scholar Award 55008733 by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (to M.H.), and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy CIBSS, EXC-2189, Project ID 390939984 (to H.J.J.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Shears SB. Intimate connections: Inositol pyrophosphates at the interface of metabolic regulation and cell signaling. Journal Cellular Physiology. 2018;233: 1897–1912. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Azevedo C, Saiardi A. Eukaryotic Phosphate Homeostasis: The Inositol Pyrophosphate Perspective. Trends Biochem Sci. 2017;42: 219–231. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wild R, Gerasimaite R, Jung J-Y, Truffault V, Pavlovic I, Schmidt A, et al. Control of eukaryotic phosphate homeostasis by inositol polyphosphate sensor domains. Science. 2016;352: 986–990. doi: 10.1126/science.aad9858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chabert V, Kim G-D, Qiu D, Liu G, Michaillat Mayer L, Jamsheer K M, et al. Inositol pyrophosphate dynamics reveals control of the yeast phosphate starvation program through 1,5-IP8 and the SPX domain of Pho81. Elife. 2023;12: RP87956. doi: 10.7554/eLife.87956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Guan Z, Chen J, Liu R, Chen Y, Xing Q, Du Z, et al. The cytoplasmic synthesis and coupled membrane translocation of eukaryotic polyphosphate by signal-activated VTC complex. Nat Commun. 2023;14: 718. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36466-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cordeiro CD, Saiardi A, Docampo R. The inositol pyrophosphate synthesis pathway in Trypanosoma brucei is linked to polyphosphate synthesis in acidocalcisomes. Mol Microbiol. 2017;106: 319–333. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Couso I, Evans BS, Li J, Liu Y, Ma F, Diamond S, et al. Synergism between Inositol Polyphosphates and TOR Kinase Signaling in Nutrient Sensing, Growth Control, and Lipid Metabolism in Chlamydomonas. Plant Cell. 2016;28: 2026–2042. doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stevenson-Paulik J, Bastidas RJ, Chiou S-T, Frye RA, York JD. Generation of phytate-free seeds in Arabidopsis through disruption of inositol polyphosphate kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102: 12612–12617. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504172102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhu J, Lau K, Puschmann R, Harmel RK, Zhang Y, Pries V, et al. Two bifunctional inositol pyrophosphate kinases/phosphatases control plant phosphate homeostasis. eLife. 2019;8: e43582. doi: 10.7554/eLife.43582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dong J, Ma G, Sui L, Wei M, Satheesh V, Zhang R, et al. Inositol Pyrophosphate InsP8 Acts as an Intracellular Phosphate Signal in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant. 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ried MK, Wild R, Zhu J, Pipercevic J, Sturm K, Broger L, et al. Inositol pyrophosphates promote the interaction of SPX domains with the coiled-coil motif of PHR transcription factors to regulate plant phosphate homeostasis. Nature Communications. 2021;12: 384. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20681-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Riemer E, Qiu D, Laha D, Harmel RK, Gaugler P, Gaugler V, et al. ITPK1 is an InsP6/ADP phosphotransferase that controls phosphate signaling in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant. 2021;14: 1864–1880. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2021.07.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Guan Z, Zhang Q, Zhang Z, Zuo J, Chen J, Liu R, et al. Mechanistic insights into the regulation of plant phosphate homeostasis by the rice SPX2—PHR2 complex. Nat Commun. 2022;13: 1581. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29275-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gu C, Nguyen H-N, Hofer A, Jessen HJ, Dai X, Wang H, et al. The Significance of the Bifunctional Kinase/Phosphatase Activities of PPIP5Ks for Coupling Inositol Pyrophosphate Cell-Signaling to Cellular Phosphate Homeostasis. J Biol Chem. 2017; jbc.M116.765743. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.765743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li X, Gu C, Hostachy S, Sahu S, Wittwer C, Jessen HJ, et al. Control of XPR1-dependent cellular phosphate efflux by InsP8 is an exemplar for functionally-exclusive inositol pyrophosphate signaling. PNAS. 2020;117: 3568–3574. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908830117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang Z, Jork N, Bittner T, Wang H, Jessen HJ, Shears SB. Rapid stimulation of cellular Pi uptake by the inositol pyrophosphate InsP 8 induced by its photothermal release from lipid nanocarriers using a near infra-red light-emitting diode. Chem Sci. 2020;11: 10265–10278. doi: 10.1039/d0sc02144j [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Haykir B, Moser SO, Pastor-Arroyo EM, Schnitzbauer U, Radvanyi Z, Prucker I, et al. The Ip6k1 and Ip6k2 Kinases Are Critical for Normal Renal Tubular Function. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024;35: 441–455. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pipercevic J, Kohl B, Gerasimaite R, Comte-Miserez V, Hostachy S, Müntener T, et al. Inositol pyrophosphates activate the vacuolar transport chaperone complex in yeast by disrupting a homotypic SPX domain interaction. Nat Commun. 2023;14: 2645. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38315-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rubio V, Linhares F, Solano R, Martín AC, Iglesias J, Leyva A, et al. A conserved MYB transcription factor involved in phosphate starvation signaling both in vascular plants and in unicellular algae. Genes and Development. 2001. doi: 10.1101/gad.204401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bustos R, Castrillo G, Linhares F, Puga MI, Rubio V, Pérez-Pérez J, et al. A Central Regulatory System Largely Controls Transcriptional Activation and Repression Responses to Phosphate Starvation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2010;6: e1001102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lv Q, Zhong Y, Wang Y, Wang Z, Zhang L, Shi J, et al. SPX4 Negatively Regulates Phosphate Signaling and Homeostasis through Its Interaction with PHR2 in Rice. Plant Cell. 2014;26: 1586–1597. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.123208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Puga MI, Mateos I, Charukesi R, Wang Z, Franco-Zorrilla JM, de Lorenzo L, et al. SPX1 is a phosphate-dependent inhibitor of Phosphate Starvation Response 1 in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111: 14947–14952. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404654111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang Z, Ruan W, Shi J, Zhang L, Xiang D, Yang C, et al. Rice SPX1 and SPX2 inhibit phosphate starvation responses through interacting with PHR2 in a phosphate-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111: 14953–14958. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404680111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhou J, Hu Q, Xiao X, Yao D, Ge S, Ye J, et al. Mechanism of phosphate sensing and signaling revealed by rice SPX1-PHR2 complex structure. Nat Commun. 2021;12: 7040. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27391-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Laha D, Parvin N, Hofer A, Giehl RFH, Fernandez-Rebollo N, von Wirén N, et al. Arabidopsis ITPK1 and ITPK2 Have an Evolutionarily Conserved Phytic Acid Kinase Activity. ACS Chem Biol. 2019;14: 2127–2133. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.9b00423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Desai M, Rangarajan P, Donahue JL, Williams SP, Land ES, Mandal MK, et al. Two inositol hexakisphosphate kinases drive inositol pyrophosphate synthesis in plants. Plant J. 2014;80: 642–653. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Laha D, Johnen P, Azevedo C, Dynowski M, Weiß M, Capolicchio S, et al. VIH2 Regulates the Synthesis of Inositol Pyrophosphate InsP8 and Jasmonate-Dependent Defenses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2015;27: 1082–1097. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.135160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kuo H-F, Chang T-Y, Chiang S-F, Wang W-D, Charng Y, Chiou T-J. Arabidopsis inositol pentakisphosphate 2-kinase, AtIPK1, is required for growth and modulates phosphate homeostasis at the transcriptional level. Plant J. 2014;80: 503–515. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kuo H-F, Hsu Y-Y, Lin W-C, Chen K-Y, Munnik T, Brearley CA, et al. Arabidopsis inositol phosphate kinases IPK1 and ITPK1 constitute a metabolic pathway in maintaining phosphate homeostasis. The Plant Journal. 2018;95: 613–630. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13974 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mulugu S, Bai W, Fridy PC, Bastidas RJ, Otto JC, Dollins DE, et al. A Conserved Family of Enzymes That Phosphorylate Inositol Hexakisphosphate. Science. 2007;316: 106–109. doi: 10.1126/science.1139099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Steidle EA, Chong LS, Wu M, Crooke E, Fiedler D, Resnick AC, et al. A Novel Inositol Pyrophosphate Phosphatase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2016;291: 6772–6783. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.714907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ingram SW, Stratemann SA, Barnes LD. Schizosaccharomyces pombe Aps1, a Diadenosine 5‘,5‘ ”-P1,P6-Hexaphosphate Hydrolase That Is a Member of the Nudix (MutT) Family of Hydrolases: Cloning of the Gene and Characterization of the Purified Enzyme,. Biochemistry. 1999;38: 3649–3655. doi: 10.1021/bi982951j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cartwright JL, McLennan AG. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae YOR163w Gene Encodes a Diadenosine 5′,5‴-P 1,P 6-Hexaphosphate (Ap6A) Hydrolase Member of the MutT Motif (Nudix Hydrolase) Family *. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1999;274: 8604–8610. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.13.8604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Safrany ST, Ingram SW, Cartwright JL, Falck JR, McLennan AG, Barnes LD, et al. The Diadenosine Hexaphosphate Hydrolases fromSchizosaccharomyces pombe and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Are Homologues of the Human Diphosphoinositol Polyphosphate Phosphohydrolase. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1999;274: 21735–21740. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.31.21735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pöhlmann J, Risse C, Seidel C, Pohlmann T, Jakopec V, Walla E, et al. The Vip1 inositol polyphosphate kinase family regulates polarized growth and modulates the microtubule cytoskeleton in fungi. PLoS Genet. 2014;10: e1004586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dollins DE, Bai W, Fridy PC, Otto JC, Neubauer JL, Gattis SG, et al. Vip1 is a kinase and pyrophosphatase switch that regulates inositol diphosphate signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020;117: 9356–9364. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908875117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sanchez AM, Schwer B, Jork N, Jessen HJ, Shuman S. Activities, substrate specificity, and genetic interactions of fission yeast Siw14, a cysteinyl-phosphatase-type inositol pyrophosphatase. Winston FM, editor. mBio. 2023;14: e02056–23. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02056-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wang H, Gu C, Rolfes RJ, Jessen HJ, Shears SB. Structural and biochemical characterization of Siw14: A protein-tyrosine phosphatase fold that metabolizes inositol pyrophosphates. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2018;293: 6905–6914. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kurz L, Schmieder P, Veiga N, Fiedler D. One Scaffold, Two Conformations: The Ring-Flip of the Messenger InsP8 Occurs under Cytosolic Conditions. Biomolecules. 2023;13: 645. doi: 10.3390/biom13040645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang H, Perera L, Jork N, Zong G, Riley AM, Potter BVL, et al. A structural exposé of noncanonical molecular reactivity within the protein tyrosine phosphatase WPD loop. Nat Commun. 2022;13: 2231. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29673-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gaugler P, Schneider R, Liu G, Qiu D, Weber J, Schmid J, et al. Arabidopsis PFA-DSP-Type Phosphohydrolases Target Specific Inositol Pyrophosphate Messengers. Biochemistry. 2022;61: 1213–1227. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.2c00145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yoshimura K, Shigeoka S. Versatile physiological functions of the Nudix hydrolase family in Arabidopsis. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry. 2015;79: 354–366. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2014.987207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Carreras-Puigvert J, Zitnik M, Jemth A-S, Carter M, Unterlass JE, Hallström B, et al. A comprehensive structural, biochemical and biological profiling of the human NUDIX hydrolase family. Nat Commun. 2017;8: 1541. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01642-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Garza JA, Ilangovan U, Hinck AP, Barnes LD. Kinetic, Dynamic, Ligand Binding Properties, and Structural Models of a Dual-Substrate Specific Nudix Hydrolase from Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Biochemistry. 2009;48: 6224–6239. doi: 10.1021/bi802266g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lonetti A, Szijgyarto Z, Bosch D, Loss O, Azevedo C, Saiardi A. Identification of an evolutionarily conserved family of inorganic polyphosphate endopolyphosphatases. J Biol Chem. 2011;286: 31966–31974. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.266320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kilari RS, Weaver JD, Shears SB, Safrany ST. Understanding inositol pyrophosphate metabolism and function: kinetic characterization of the DIPPs. FEBS Lett. 2013;587. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.08.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Márquez-Moñino MÁ, Ortega-García R, Shipton ML, Franco-Echevarría E, Riley AM, Sanz-Aparicio J, et al. Multiple substrate recognition by yeast diadenosine and diphosphoinositol polyphosphate phosphohydrolase through phosphate clamping. Sci Adv. 2021;7: eabf6744. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf6744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zong G, Jork N, Hostachy S, Fiedler D, Jessen HJ, Shears SB, et al. New structural insights reveal an expanded reaction cycle for inositol pyrophosphate hydrolysis by human DIPP1. The FASEB Journal. 2021;35: e21275. doi: 10.1096/fj.202001489R [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Olejnik K, Murcha MW, Whelan J, Kraszewska E. Cloning and characterization of AtNUDT13, a novel mitochondrial Arabidopsis thaliana Nudix hydrolase specific for long-chain diadenosine polyphosphates. The FEBS Journal. 2007;274: 4877–4885. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.06009.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Pascual-Ortiz M, Saiardi A, Walla E, Jakopec V, Künzel NA, Span I, et al. Asp1 Bifunctional Activity Modulates Spindle Function via Controlling Cellular Inositol Pyrophosphate Levels in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Cell Biol. 2018;38: pii: e00047-18. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00047-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Garg A, Shuman S, Schwer B. A genetic screen for suppressors of hyper-repression of the fission yeast PHO regulon by Pol2 CTD mutation T4A implicates inositol 1-pyrophosphates as agonists of precocious lncRNA transcription termination. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48: 10739–10752. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Steidle EA, Morrissette VA, Fujimaki K, Chong L, Resnick AC, Capaldi AP, et al. The InsP7 phosphatase Siw14 regulates inositol pyrophosphate levels to control localization of the general stress response transcription factor Msn2. J Biol Chem. 2020;295: 2043–2056. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.012148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.He H, Su J, Shu S, Zhang Y, Ao Y, Liu B, et al. Two Homologous Putative Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases, OsPFA-DSP2 and AtPFA-DSP4, Negatively Regulate the Pathogen Response in Transgenic Plants. PLOS ONE. 2012;7: e34995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Liu B, Fan J, Zhang Y, Mu P, Wang P, Su J, et al. OsPFA-DSP1, a rice protein tyrosine phosphatase, negatively regulates drought stress responses in transgenic tobacco and rice plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2012;31: 1021–1032. doi: 10.1007/s00299-011-1220-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sanchez AM, Garg A, Shuman S, Schwer B. Inositol pyrophosphates impact phosphate homeostasis via modulation of RNA 3’ processing and transcription termination. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47: 8452–8469. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wu M, Chong LS, Perlman DH, Resnick AC, Fiedler D. Inositol polyphosphates intersect with signaling and metabolic networks via two distinct mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113: E6757–E6765. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606853113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Furkert D, Hostachy S, Nadler-Holly M, Fiedler D. Triplexed Affinity Reagents to Sample the Mammalian Inositol Pyrophosphate Interactome. Cell Chem Biol. 2020;27: 1097–1108.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2020.07.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Del Vecchio HA, Ying S, Park J, Knowles VL, Kanno S, Tanoi K, et al. The cell wall-targeted purple acid phosphatase AtPAP25 is critical for acclimation of Arabidopsis thaliana to nutritional phosphorus deprivation. Plant J. 2014;80: 569–581. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12663 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012;337: 816–821. doi: 10.1126/science.1225829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Qiu D, Wilson MS, Eisenbeis VB, Harmel RK, Riemer E, Haas TM, et al. Analysis of inositol phosphate metabolism by capillary electrophoresis electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Nat Commun. 2020;11: 6035. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19928-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Qiu D, Gu C, Liu G, Ritter K, Eisenbeis VB, Bittner T, et al. Capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry identifies new isomers of inositol pyrophosphates in mammalian tissues. Chem Sci. 2023;14: 658–667. doi: 10.1039/d2sc05147h [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bowman JL, Araki T, Arteaga-Vazquez MA, Berger F, Dolan L, Haseloff J, et al. The Naming of Names: Guidelines for Gene Nomenclature in Marchantia. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016;57: 257–261. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcv193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wang H, Falck JR, Hall TMT, Shears SB. Structural basis for an inositol pyrophosphate kinase surmounting phosphate crowding. Nat Chem Biol. 2012;8: 111–116. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Cuyas L, David P, de Craieye D, Ng S, Arkoun M, Plassard C, et al. Identification and interest of molecular markers to monitor plant Pi status. BMC Plant Biol. 2023;23: 401. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04411-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Almagro L, Gómez Ros LV, Belchi-Navarro S, Bru R, Ros Barceló A, Pedreño MA. Class III peroxidases in plant defence reactions. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2009;60: 377–390. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ishida A, Ono K, Matsusaka T. Cell wall-associated peroxidase in cultured cells of liverwort, Marchantia polymorpha L. Changes of peroxidase level and its localization in the cell wall. Plant Cell Reports. 1985;4: 54–57. doi: 10.1007/BF00269205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hu B, Jiang Z, Wang W, Qiu Y, Zhang Z, Liu Y, et al. Nitrate–NRT1.1B–SPX4 cascade integrates nitrogen and phosphorus signalling networks in plants. Nature Plants. 2019;5: 401. doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0384-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zhang Z, Li Z, Wang W, Jiang Z, Guo L, Wang X, et al. Modulation of nitrate-induced phosphate response by the MYB transcription factor RLI1/HINGE1 in the nucleus. Mol Plant. 2021;14: 517–529. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ueda Y, Kiba T, Yanagisawa S. Nitrate-inducible NIGT1 proteins modulate phosphate uptake and starvation signalling via transcriptional regulation of SPX genes. The Plant Journal. 2020;102: 448–466. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14637 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Tang H, Lu K-J, Zhang Y, Cheng Y-L, Tu S-L, Friml J. Divergence of trafficking and polarization mechanisms for PIN auxin transporters during land plant evolution. Plant Communications. 2024;5: 100669. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100669 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kato H, Kouno M, Takeda M, Suzuki H, Ishizaki K, Nishihama R, et al. The Roles of the Sole Activator-Type Auxin Response Factor in Pattern Formation of Marchantia polymorpha. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2017;58: 1642–1651. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcx095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Laha NP, Giehl RFH, Riemer E, Qiu D, Pullagurla NJ, Schneider R, et al. INOSITOL (1,3,4) TRIPHOSPHATE 5/6 KINASE1-dependent inositol polyphosphates regulate auxin responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2022;190: 2722–2738. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Tan X, Calderon-Villalobos LIA, Sharon M, Zheng C, Robinson CV, Estelle M, et al. Mechanism of auxin perception by the TIR1 ubiquitin ligase. Nature. 2007;446: 640–645. doi: 10.1038/nature05731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Rico-Reséndiz F, Cervantes-Pérez SA, Espinal-Centeno A, Dipp-Álvarez M, Oropeza-Aburto A, Hurtado-Bautista E, et al. Transcriptional and Morpho-Physiological Responses of Marchantia polymorpha upon Phosphate Starvation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21: 8354. doi: 10.3390/ijms21218354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Khan GA, Dutta A, van de Meene A, Frandsen KEH, Ogden M, Whelan J, et al. Phosphate starvation regulates cellulose synthesis to modify root growth. Plant Physiol. 2024;194: 1204–1217. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Shukla A, Kaur M, Kanwar S, Kaur G, Sharma S, Ganguli S, et al. Wheat inositol pyrophosphate kinase TaVIH2-3B modulates cell-wall composition and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. BMC Biol. 2021;19: 261. doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01198-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Müller J, Toev T, Heisters M, Teller J, Moore KL, Hause G, et al. Iron-Dependent Callose Deposition Adjusts Root Meristem Maintenance to Phosphate Availability. Developmental Cell. 2015;33: 216–230. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Balzergue C, Dartevelle T, Godon C, Laugier E, Meisrimler C, Teulon J-M, et al. Low phosphate activates STOP1-ALMT1 to rapidly inhibit root cell elongation. Nature Communications. 2017;8: 15300. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kant S, Peng M, Rothstein SJ. Genetic Regulation by NLA and MicroRNA827 for Maintaining Nitrate-Dependent Phosphate Homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Qu L-J, editor. PLoS Genetics. 2011;7: e1002021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Liu W, Sun Q, Wang K, Du Q, Li W-X. Nitrogen Limitation Adaptation (NLA) is involved in source-to-sink remobilization of nitrate by mediating the degradation of NRT1.7 in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2017;214: 734–744. doi: 10.1111/nph.14396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Fernandes JC, García-Angulo P, Goulao LF, Acebes JL, Amâncio S. Mineral stress affects the cell wall composition of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) callus. Plant Sci. 2013;205–206: 111–120. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.01.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Rivai RR, Miyamoto T, Awano T, Takada R, Tobimatsu Y, Umezawa T, et al. Nitrogen deficiency results in changes to cell wall composition of sorghum seedlings. Sci Rep. 2021;11: 23309. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02570-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Głazowska S, Baldwin L, Mravec J, Bukh C, Fangel JU, Willats WG, et al. The source of inorganic nitrogen has distinct effects on cell wall composition in Brachypodium distachyon. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2019;70: 6461–6473. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Lei Y, Lu L, Liu H-Y, Li S, Xing F, Chen L-L. CRISPR-P: A Web Tool for Synthetic Single-Guide RNA Design of CRISPR-System in Plants. Molecular Plant. 2014;7: 1494–1496. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssu044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal. 1998;16: 735–743. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Sugano SS, Nishihama R, Shirakawa M, Takagi J, Matsuda Y, Ishida S, et al. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing and its application to conditional genetic analysis in Marchantia polymorpha. PLOS ONE. 2018;13: e0205117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Ishizaki K, Chiyoda S, Yamato KT, Kohchi T. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the haploid liverwort Marchantia polymorpha L., an emerging model for plant biology. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008;49: 1084–1091. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcn085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Delhaize E, Randall PJ. Characterization of a Phosphate-Accumulator Mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1995;107: 207–213. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.1.207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Shevchenko A, Tomas H, Havlis J, Olsen JV, Mann M. In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nat Protoc. 2006;1: 2856–2860. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Nesvizhskii AI, Keller A, Kolker E, Aebersold R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2003;75: 4646–4658. doi: 10.1021/ac0341261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7: 539. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 1987; 406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O. SeaView version 4: A multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27: 221–224. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Harmel RK, Puschmann R, Nguyen Trung M, Saiardi A, Schmieder P, Fiedler D. Harnessing 13C-labeled myo-inositol to interrogate inositol phosphate messengers by NMR. Chem Sci. 2019;10: 5267–5274. doi: 10.1039/c9sc00151d [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9: 676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Haas TM, Mundinger S, Qiu D, Jork N, Ritter K, Dürr-Mayer T, et al. Stable Isotope Phosphate Labelling of Diverse Metabolites is Enabled by a Family of 18O-Phosphoramidites**. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2022;61: e202112457. doi: 10.1002/anie.202112457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Liu G, Riemer E, Schneider R, Cabuzu D, Bonny O, Wagner CA, et al. The phytase RipBL1 enables the assignment of a specific inositol phosphate isomer as a structural component of human kidney stones. RSC Chem Biol. 2023;4: 300–309. doi: 10.1039/d2cb00235c [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, Käller M. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32: 3047–3048. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37: 907–915. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Pertea M, Kim D, Pertea GM, Leek JT, Salzberg SL. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat Protoc. 2016;11: 1650–1667. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology. 2014;15: 550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2013. ISBN 3-900051-07-0; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 103.Ames B. Assay of inorganic phosphate, total phosphate and phosphatases. Methods Enzymol. 1966;8: 115–118. [Google Scholar]
- 104.Miranda KM, Espey MG, Wink DA. A Rapid, Simple Spectrophotometric Method for Simultaneous Detection of Nitrate and Nitrite. Nitric Oxide. 2001;5: 62–71. doi: 10.1006/niox.2000.0319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Dunnett CW. A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a Control. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1955;50: 1096–1121. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1955.10501294 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J. 2008;50: 346–363. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200810425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Tukey JW, Ciminera JL, Heyse JF. Testing the statistical certainty of a response to increasing doses of a drug. Biometrics. 1985;41: 295–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]