Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 Dec 2;14:29978. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76179-2

Associations between pesticide use and rheumatoid arthritis among older farmers in the Agricultural Health Study

Christine G Parks 1,, Darya Leyzarovich 2, Ghassan B Hamra 2, Karen H Costenbader 3, Dazhe Chen 1, Jonathan N Hofmann 4, Laura E Beane Freeman 4, Dale P Sandler 1
PMCID: PMC11611918  PMID: 39622868

Abstract

Pesticides and farming have been associated with increased rheumatoid arthritis (RA) risk, but the role of specific pesticides remains unknown. We examined RA risk among licensed pesticide applicators (97% white male farmers), from North Carolina and Iowa, in the Agricultural Health Study, in relation to lifetime use of 45 pesticides reported at enrollment (1993–1997, updated 1999–2003). In 22,642 applicators ages ≥ 67 years with ≥ 24 months Fee for Service Medicare data (1999–2016), we identified 161 (0.7%) incident cases with ≥ 2 RA claims (including ≥ 1 by a rheumatologist), ≥ 30 days apart, after ≥ 12 months without RA claims. Relative risks (RR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated using log-binomial models adjusted for age, state, education, smoking, and correlated pesticides. Risk was elevated (RR > 1.5 or lower CI > 0.95) for use of nine pesticides: four insecticides [malathion (RR = 1.77;95%CI = 1.14–2.73), phorate (1.40;0.96–2.04), carbaryl (1.65;1.10–2.46), carbofuran (1.41;0.99–2.01)], four herbicides [alachlor (RR = 1.40;95%CI 0.99–1.98), metolachlor (1.57;1.11–2.23), S-Ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate (1.57;1.00-2.44), metribuzin (1.45; 1.01, 2.08)], and one fungicide [benomyl (1.56;0.99–2.44)]. Exposure-response was seen for greater intensity-weighted lifetime days use of malathion and carbofuran (p-trends = 0.03 and 0.05). Some specific pesticides, including several currently approved and commonly used in agricultural, public health, or residential settings may increase RA risk among older adults.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-76179-2.

Subject terms: Rheumatoid arthritis, Environmental sciences, Rheumatology, Risk factors

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) characterized by inflammation in the joints and effects in multiple organ systems, leading to long-term damage and disability1. Risk of RA is higher in older adults, and rates may be increasing worldwide, indicating a potential role of environmental factors2,3. Family history and genetics, cigarette smoking, and occupational exposure to respirable silica dust are the best-established environmental risk factors4,5. Farming occupation has been associated with RA in many but not all populations examined610, and some studies report associations with general pesticide use or classes of pesticides7,1113. Pesticides include diverse active ingredients used as insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, and fumigants with varying mechanisms of action, and the role of specific pesticides in the development of RA remains unknown.

In the Agricultural Health Study (AHS), a prospective cohort of ~ 89,000 licensed pesticide applicators (mostly farmers) and spouses from North Carolina and Iowa enrolled in 1993–1997, previous research suggested some specific pesticides could be associated with self-reported RA14,15. In over 26,000 male private applicators completing at least one follow-up questionnaire (1999–2015; ~50% of those enrolled), 220 (0.8%) incident self-reported RA cases were identified and confirmed as probable cases based on use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic medication and a limited number of medical records. Results showed associations of RA with the use of five specific pesticides reported at AHS enrollment, including 3 insecticides (toxaphene, fonofos, and carbary) and 2 herbicides (atrazine, and chlorimuron ethyl) with notable findings for two pesticides with widespread use, including a significant trend for increasing cumulative days mixing or applying atrazine, an agricultural herbicide, and a suggestive trend for carbaryl, an insecticide with residential and agricultural applications. Interpretation of these findings was limited by lack of specificity of self-reported RA16, and low participation in follow-up and disease validation14.

Here, we investigate the association of pesticides with RA risk in a sub-cohort of older AHS participants (ages ≥ 65 years, 1999–2016) linked to Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) administrative healthcare data17. These data provide an improved assessment of RA cases (including those who did not complete active follow-up) and identification of cases based on multiple medical claims for RA and specialist care by a rheumatologist. The study also updates data on pesticide use (prior to RA diagnosis) through 2003, and explores associations stratified by smoking, an established risk factor for RA18.

Results

Sample and case characteristics

Over a median of 8.5 (IQR 4.5–13.4) years of continuous FFS coverage we identified 22,084 participants without claims for RA, and 319 incident cases with ≥ 2 claims for RA ≥ 30 days apart, of which 161 were confirmed by specialist claims [median 4.4 (IQR1.8, 8.4) and 4.3 (1.9, 8.8) years to diagnosis, respectively Table 1]. Median age at the first RA claim was 73.7 (IQR 70.0, 77.9) and 72.9 (69.1, 76.9) years, respectively among overall and specialist-confirmed cases. Cases were older at AHS enrollment [median ages 61 (IQR 56, 67) overall, and 60 (IQR 55, 64) years specialist-confirmed), than non-cases [median 57 (IQR 51–64) years], were more often from North Carolina (54.9% overall, 54.0% specialist-confirmed, versus 40.8% non-cases), and fewer had a post-secondary education (21.9% overall and 26.1% specialist-confirmed, versus 31.7% non-cases). Cases were more likely to have smoked (overall, 60.2% and specialist-confirmed, 59.6%, versus 54.0% non-cases); median pack-years ranged from 0.5 (IQR 0.0, 15.0) in non-cases to 3.1 (0.0-22.5) in overall and 2.5 (0.0, 18.8) in specialist-confirmed cases. Overall cases had a similar lifetime days of general pesticide use (median 225; IQR = 64, 457) versus non-cases (225; 88–508); specialist-confirmed cases had fewer median days of use (179), but a similar IQR to overall and non-cases (64, 457). Main analyses were performed using specialist-confirmed cases, with ancillary analyses of overall cases, given differential access to specialist care among older participants in a rural environment19.

Table 1.

Characteristics of AHS applicators with ≥ 24 months continuous Medicare-FFS: non-cases, possible and specialist-confirmed cases with incident rheumatoid arthritis

Sample characteristics 1 Cases
Non-cases Overall2 Specialist-Confirmed3
N = 22,084 N = 319 N = 161
Continuous FFS years (median, IQR) 8.5 (4.5, 13.4) 4.4 (1.8, 8.4) 4.3 (1.9, 8.8)
Diagnosis age (median, IQR) --- 73.7 (70.0, 77.9) 72.9 (69.1, 76.9)
Enrollment
Age years (median, IQR) 57 (51, 64) 61 (56, 67) 60 (55, 64)
State (n, %)
Iowa 13,063 (59.2%) 144 (45.1%) 74 (46.0%)
North Carolina 9021 (40.8%) 175 (54.9%) 87 (54.0%)
Education (n, %)
≤High school 14,005 (63.4%) 230 (72.1%) 108 (67.1%)
> High school 6995 (31.7%) 70 (21.9%) 42 (26.1%)
Missing 1084 (4.9%) 19 (6.0%) 11 (6.8%)
Smoking (n, %)
Ever 12,060 (54.0%) 194 (60.2%) 96 (59.6%)
Past 9360 (41.9%) 163 (50.6%) 77 (48.4%)
Current 2700 (12.1%) 31 (9.6%) 19 (11.8%)
Pack-years (median, IQR) 0.5 (0.0, 15.0) 3.1 (0.0, 22.5) 2.5 (0.0, 18.8)
Lifetime days mixed or applied pesticides (median, IQR) 225 (88, 508) 225 (64, 457) 179 (64, 457)

FFS, Fee for Service; IQR, cut-points for first and 3rd quartiles.

1Sample includes about 97% white males. The number of female and non-white cases, non-smokers, and missing smoking data are not shown, due to Ns < 11 or derivatives that may reveal number < 11 cases. Greater than high school education includes at least some college, associates, or 4-year college degree.

2Among participants with ≥ 24 months continuous FFS coverage (Parts A and B, without Part C), including an initial ≥ 12-month clean period with no claims for rheumatoid arthritis.

3Specialist-confirmed cases had ≥ 2 claims for RA ≥ 30 days apart plus ≥ 1 claims from a rheumatologist. Overall cases included all incident RA.

Ever use of specific pesticides

Table 2 shows the frequency of 45 specific pesticides and results of log binomial regression models adjusted for age, state, education, smoking pack-years, and correlated pesticides (R2 > 0.35; Supplementary Table 1). Results showed 9 pesticides with elevated risk (i.e., RRs ≥ 1.5 and/or lower CIs ≥ 0.95): 4 insecticides [malathion (RR = 1.77;95%CI = 1.14–2.73), phorate (1.40;0.96–2.04), carbaryl (1.65;1.10–2.46), carbofuran (1.41;0.99–2.01)], 4 herbicides [alachlor (RR = 1.40;95%CI 0.99–1.98), metolachlor (1.57;1.11–2.23), S-Ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate (EPTC) (1.57;1.00-2.44), metribuzin (1.45; 1.01, 2.08)], and 1 fungicide [benomyl (1.56;0.99–2.44)].

Table 2.

Ever use of specific pesticides and risk of specialist-confirmed RA among AHS applicators with ≥ 24 months continuous Medicare-FFS (1999–2016)

Ever-used1 Non-cases (N = 22,084) Cases2 (N = 161) Relative Risk (95% CI)3
N (%) N (%)
Insecticides
Organochlorines
Aldrin 6502 (33) 46 (33) 1.07 (0.73–1.55)
Chlordane 7065 (36) 51 (36) 0.93 (0.66–1.32)
DDT 8906 (45) 72 (51) 1.05 (0.75–1.48)
Dieldrin 2295 (12) 14 (10) 0.85 (0.48–1.49)
Heptachlor 5178 (26) 33 (24) 0.98 (0.64–1.50)
Lindane 4674 (24) 33 (24) 1.09 (0.73–1.62)
Toxaphene 4169 (21) 40 (29) 1.31 (0.90–1.90)
Organophosphates
Chlorpyrifos 8203 (41) 57 (40) 1.05 (0.75–1.48)
Diazinon 7059 (36) 53 (38) 0.99 (0.70–1.41)
Dichlorvos 2064 (11) 14 (10) 1.16 (0.66–2.04)
Fonofos 4328 (22) 31 (23) 1.37 (0.89–2.12)
Malathion 14,493 (73) 115 (82) 1.77 (1.14–2.73)
Parathion 3681 (19) 37 (26) 1.32 (0.90–1.94)
Phorate 7447 (38) 55 (39) 1.40 (0.96–2.04)
Terbufos 7122 (37) 50 (37) 1.25 (0.87–1.81)
Carbamates
Aldicarb 2000 (10) 18 (13) 0.82 (0.47–1.45)
Carbaryl 12,247 (62) 106 (75) 1.65 (1.10–2.46)
Carbofuran 5917 (30) 49 (37) 1.41 (0.99–2.01)
Pyrethroids
Permethrin - crops 2184 (11) 17 (13) 1.18 (0.71–1.96)
Permethrin - animals 1950 (10) 12 (9) 1.11 (0.61–2.03)
Herbicides
Anilids/anilines
Alachlor 10,517 (54) 81 (59) 1.40 (0.99–1.98)
Metolachlor 8647 (44) 70 (51) 1.57 (1.11–2.23)
Pendimethalin 8606 (44) 58 (41) 0.97 (0.69–1.36)
Trifluralin 10,103 (52) 70 (52) 1.29 (0.89–1.86)
Phenoxy
2,4-D 15,885 (79) 109 (77) 1.08 (0.72–1.63)
2,4,5-T 6317 (32) 38 (27) 0.80 (0.54–1.17)
2,4,5-TP 2504 (13) 13 (9) 0.70 (0.40–1.25)
Thiocarbamate
Butylate 6456 (34) 49 (36) 1.17 (0.79–1.74)
EPTC 3288 (17) 27 (20) 1.57 (1.00-2.44)
Triazine/Triazinone
Atrazine 14,409 (74) 107 (78) 1.36 (0.88–2.12)
Cyanazine 7912 (41) 53 (38) 1.24 (0.84–1.82)
Metribuzin 8963 (46) 66 (47) 1.45 (1.01–2.08)
Other
Chlorimuron Ethyl 6623 (34) 48 (34) 1.16 (0.82–1.66)
Dicamba 9581 (49) 60 (43) 1.12 (0.74–1.68)
Glyphosate 15,985 (80) 113 (80) 0.99 (0.65–1.50)
Imazethapyr 7492 (39) 44 (32) 1.07 (0.69–1.65)
Paraquat 4661 (24) 41 (29) 1.12 (0.77–1.65)
Petroleum Oil 8918 (46) 65 (46) 1.22 (0.86–1.72)
Fungicides/Fumigants
Benomyl 2294 (12) 28 (20) 1.56 (0.99–2.44)
Captan 2054 (11) 16 (12) 1.15 (0.68–1.94)
Chlorothalonil 1583 (8) 20 (14) 1.32 (0.74–2.34)
Carbon tetrachloride/disulfide 1741 (9) 12 (9) 0.98 (0.54–1.78)
Maneb 2226 (11) 20 (14) 0.98 (0.59–1.62)
Metalaxyl 4547 (23) 44 (32) 1.25 (0.84–1.85)
Methyl bromide 3233 (16) 31 (22) 1.05 (0.67–1.65)

1Lifetime history ever used specific pesticides at enrollment (1993–1997) or first follow-up (1999–2003) prior to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosis.

2Among participants with ≥ 24 months continuous fee for service (FFS) coverage (Parts A and B without Part C), including an initial ≥ 12-month clean period with no claims for RA, specialist-confirmed cases had ≥ 2 claims for RA ≥ 30 days apart plus ≥ 1 claim from a rheumatologist.

3Relative Risk and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated using log binomial regression in covariate-adjusted models. Models adjust for categorical age at enrollment (40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70+), state (NC, IA), education (≤ high school, > high school) and smoking pack-years, and correlated pesticides: aldicarb (chlorothalonil and benomyl), chlorothalonil (aldicarb and benomyl), atrazine (alachlor), butylate (cyanazine and metribuzin).

Cumulative exposure-response

For 18 pesticides with ≥ 30% of cases exposed (i.e., 6 insecticides and 12 herbicides), we evaluated exposure-response trends for greater cumulative intensity-weighted lifetime days (i.e., IWLD: Tertiles, T1-3, and median split, M1-2, versus no use; in which T3 > T1 or M2 > M1; Table 3). Among the insecticides, we saw an exposure-response trend for malathion, in which the largest RR was seen for the top IWLD tertile (T1, 1.67;0.95–2.94, ptrend=0.03)]. For carbaryl, the largest RR was seen for the lowest IWLD tertile (T1, 1.75; 0.97–3.16]. while for carbofuran, the largest RR was seen above the median IWLD (M2, 1.53; 0.99, 2.37; ptrend=0.05). Among the herbicides, we saw no evidence of significant exposure-response trends. For alachlor, the largest RR was seen for the middle tertile of IWLD (T2 1.45; 0.91–2.30); and, while the trend p-value was 0.04 for metolachlor, RR were elevated for both the lowest and highest tertiles [(T1, 1.87;1.17-3.00) and (T3, 1.60;0.98–2.59)]. We saw an elevated RR for higher levels of butylate, but not a significant trend (M2, 1.74; 0.97,3.11; ptrend=0.16). Atrazine showed no evidence of exposure-response (range of RRs Q1, 1.20 to Q4, 1.33; ptrend=0.31), while the larger RR for metribuzin was below the median IWLD (M1, 1.82; 1.03–3.21).

Table 3.

Intensity weighted lifetime days of pesticide use and risk of specialist-confirmed RA among AHS applicators with ≥ 24 months continuous FFS Medicare coverage (1999–2016).

IWLD categories 1 Non-cases Cases2 Relative Risk
(N = 22,084)
N (%)
(N = 161)
N (%)
(95% CI) 3
Insecticides
Organochlorine
DDT*
None 6161 (63) 46 (60) Reference
M1 1784 (18) 16 (21) 1.01 (0.57–1.80)
M2 1796 (18) 15 (19) 0.85 (0.47–1.54)
p-trend 0.63
Organophosphate
Chlorpyrifos
None 10,333 (56) 72 (56) Reference
M1 3999 (22) 24 (19) 0.92 (0.58–1.45)
M2 3990 (22) 32 (25) 1.23 (0.81–1.86)
p-trend 0.42
Malathion*
None 3193 (31) 22 (*) Reference
T1 2418 (23) < 11 0.55 (0.25–1.25)
T2 2370 (23) 18 (*) 1.19 (0.64–2.24)
T3 2378 (23) 28 (*) 1.67 (0.95–2.94)
p-trend 0.03
Terbufos
None 10,886 (61) 75 (63) Reference
M1 3437 (19) 18 (15) 0.97 (0.57–1.64)
M2 3429 (19) 27 (23) 1.39 (0.89–2.18)
p-trend 0.19
Carbamates
Carbaryl*
None 5205 (49) 31 (38) Reference
T1 1803 (17) 18 (22) 1.75 (0.97–3.16)
T2 1810 (17) 15 (18) 1.35 (0.71–2.58)
T3 1802 (17) 18 (22) 1.36 (0.69–2.69)
p-trend 0.34
Carbofuran
None 11,958 (68) 75 (61) Reference
M1 2827 (16) 20 (16) 1.26 (0.77–2.08)
M2 2824 (16) 27 (22) 1.53 (0.99–2.37)
p-trend 0.05
Herbicides
Anilids/anilines
Alachlor
None 7700 (43) 51 (41) Reference
T1 3334 (19) 22 (18) 1.18 (0.71–1.96)
T2 3346 (19) 28 (23) 1.45 (0.91–2.30)
T3 3342 (19) 23 (19) 1.11 (0.68–1.81)
p-trend 0.38
Metolachlor
None 9493 (54) 59 (46) Reference
T1 2742 (15) 26 (20) 1.87 (1.17-3.00)
T2 2747 (16) 19 (15) 1.38 (0.82–2.33)
T3 2725 (15) 23 (18) 1.60 (0.98–2.59)
p-trend 0.04
Pendimethalin*
None 6270 (61) 52 (*) Reference
M1 1996 (19) < 11 0.47 (0.21–1.04)
M2 1991 (19) 19 (*) 1.18 (0.70-2.00)
p-trend 0.92
Trifluralin
None 8003 (45) 56 (46) Reference
T1 3237 (18) 19 (16) 1.06 (0.62–1.80)
T2 3214 (18) 21 (17) 1.27 (0.75–2.14)
T3 3240 (18) 25 (21) 1.46 (0.89–2.38)
p-trend 0.12
Phenoxy
2,4-D
None 4034 (21) 32 (23) Reference
Q1 3870 (20) 29 (21) 1.07 (0.65–1.78)
Q2 3878 (20) 23 (17) 0.92 (0.53–1.60)
Q3 3878 (20) 23 (17) 0.92 (0.53–1.61)
Q4 3866 (20) 30 (22) 1.19 (0.71-2.00)
p-trend 0.71
Thiocarbamate
Butylate*
None 7051 (73) 54 (*) Reference
M1 1327 (14) < 11 0.52 (0.20–1.33)
M2 1315 (14) 17 (*) 1.74 (0.97–3.11)
p-trend 0.16
Triazine/Triazinone
Atrazine
None 5027 (26) 31 (23) Reference
Q1 3506 (18) 23 (17) 1.20 (0.69–2.11)
Q2 3513 (18) 26 (20) 1.34 (0.77–2.33)
Q3 3507 (18) 25 (19) 1.30 (0.74–2.28)
Q4 3506 (18) 27 (20) 1.33 (0.76–2.32)
p-trend 0.31
Cyanazine
None 10,157 (57) 77 (61) Reference
M1 3827 (21) 25 (20) 1.18 (0.73–1.92)
M2 3825 (21) 25 (20) 1.19 (0.74–1.94)
p-trend 0.43
Metribuzin*
None 6061 (61) 48 (*) Reference
M1 1926 (19) 20 (*) 1.82 (1.03–3.21)
M2 1946 (20) < 11 0.89 (0.44–1.80)
p-trend 0.83
Other
Dicamba
None 8472 (48) 72 (56) Reference
T1 3069 (17) 22 (17) 1.21 (0.71–2.06)
T2 3055 (17) 19 (15) 1.06 (0.61–1.86)
T3 3067 (17) 16 (12) 0.89 (0.49–1.60)
p-trend 0.75
Glyphosate
None 4031 (21) 30 (21) Reference
Q1 3857 (20) 24 (17) 0.84 (0.49–1.45)
Q2 3856 (20) 22 (16) 0.77 (0.44–1.34)
Q3 3857 (20) 28 (20) 0.99 (0.59–1.67)
Q4 3844 (20) 37 (26) 1.27 (0.77–2.08)
p-trend 0.25
Imazethapyr
None 10,811 (60) 83 (66) Reference
M1 3645 (20) 25 (20) 1.27 (0.75–2.13)
M2 3648 (20) 17 (14) 0.92 (0.51–1.64)
p-trend 0.92

1As reported in 1993-97 and updated 1999–2003. Scores are grouped based on percent exposed cases: median (30 < 50%), tertiles (50 < 70%), or quartiles (≥ 70%) as intensity-weighted lifetime days (IWLD) use of specific pesticides up through enrollment (1993–1997) or first follow-up (1999–2003) prior to RA diagnosis; *Enrollment IWLD based on the take home questionnaire.

2Among participants with ≥ 24 months continuous fee for service (FFS) coverage (Parts A and B without Part C), including an initial ≥ 12-month clean period with no RA claims; specialist-confirmed cases had ≥ 2 claims for RA ≥ 30 days apart, plus ≥ 1 claim from a rheumatologist. Asterix (*) indicates percent not shown if number or percent not shown due to < 11 in a cell or ability to infer the count of groups with < 11 exposed cases.

3Relative Risk (RR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) calculated using log binomial regression. Models adjust for categorical age at enrollment (40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70+), state (NC, IA) state, (NC, IA)-education (≤ high school, > high school), smoking pack years, and correlated pesticides (R2 > 0.350) [aldicarb (chlorothalonil and benomyl)-chlorothalonil (aldicarb and benomyl)-atrazine (alachlor)-butylate (cyanazine and metribuzin)].

Smoking stratified analyses

For 39 pesticides with ≥ 11 exposed cases in both smokers and non-smokers (Table 4), we explored possible differences in smoking-stratified models. Among smokers, we observed associations (i.e., RRs ≥ 1.5 and/or lower CI ≥ 0.95) for 11 pesticides (phorate, carbaryl, carbofuran, alachlor, metolachlor, trifluralin, EPTC, atrazine, cyanazine, chlorimuron ethyl, and benomyl) and 3 among non-smokers (malathion, carbaryl, benomyl). Most interactions were not significant (p < 0.10), except for carbofuran [(RR = 1.74;95%CI 1.13–2.71) smokers, (0.89;0.49–1.62) non-smokers; intp=0.07)] and alachlor [(1.84;1.19–2.87) smokers, (0.96;0.55–1.67 non-smokers; intp=0.08)]. Among non-smokers, the RR for malathion was greater (RR 2.41;1.13, 5.18) than among smokers (1.36;0.82, 2.27), but the interaction was not significant (intp=0.28).

Table 4.

Specific pesticide use in AHS applicators with ≥24 months continuous FFS Medicare coverage (1999-2016): risk of specialist-confirmed RA, stratified by smoking history (ever).

Ever used1: % exposed cases2 Relative Risk (95% Confidence Intervals)3
Smokers / Non-smokers Smokers Non-smokers
Insecticides
Organochlorines
Aldrin4 35 / 28 1.30 (0.82–2.08) 0.75 (0.40–1.41)
Chlordane 34 / 37 0.82 (0.53–1.28) 1.07 (0.61–1.88)
DDT 54 / 48 1.02 (0.67–1.56) 1.06 (0.61–1.85)
Heptachlor 25 / 22 1.20 (0.70–2.06) 0.77 (0.39–1.53)
Lindane 22 / 22 1.08 (0.65–1.80) 0.94 (0.49–1.81)
Toxaphene 31 / 24 1.36 (0.86–2.14) 1.19 (0.64–2.24)
Organophosphates
Chlorpyrifos 43 / 40 1.20 (0.79–1.83) 1.05 (0.61–1.82)
Diazinon 40 / 34 1.02 (0.66–1.58) 0.93 (0.52–1.67)
Fonofos 21 / 25 1.38 (0.78–2.44) 1.27 (0.65–2.48)
Malathion 78 / 85 1.36 (0.82–2.27) 2.41 (1.13–5.18)
Parathion 27 / 24 1.19 (0.74–1.92) 1.43 (0.75–2.73)
Phorate 42 / 39 1.80 (1.13–2.89) 1.12 (0.62–2.03)
Terbufos 36 / 38 1.30 (0.82–2.07) 1.13 (0.63–2.03)
Carbamates
Aldicarb 16 / * 0.89 (0.46–1.72) 0.77 (0.27–2.19)
Carbaryl 77 / 72 1.53 (0.92–2.55) 1.77 (0.95–3.31)
Carbofuran4 40 / 28 1.75 (1.13–2.71) 0.89 (0.49–1.62)
Herbicides
Analids/analines
Alachlor4 64 / 42 1.84 (1.19–2.87) 0.96 (0.55–1.67)
Metolachlor 49 / 50 1.58 (1.02–2.45) 1.37 (0.79–2.38)
Pendimethalin 46 / 37 1.13 (0.74–1.72) 0.84 (0.48–1.47)
Trifluralin 53 / 47 1.50 (0.95–2.38) 0.90 (0.51–1.62)
Phenoxy
2,4-D 39 / 30 1.26 (0.75–2.14) 0.83 (0.44–1.57)
2,4,5-T 28 / 24 0.84 (0.53–1.36) 0.66 (0.35–1.26)
Thiocarbamate
Butylate4 39 / 30 1.42 (0.87–2.30) 0.84 (0.44–1.60)
EPTC 20 / * 1.70 (0.97–2.98) 1.31 (0.64–2.68)
Triazine/Triazinone
Atrazine4 81 / 73 1.64 (0.93–2.92) 1.04 (0.52–2.06)
Cyanazine 40 / 38 1.54 (0.95–2.51) 0.97 (0.52–1.79)
Metribuzin 45 / 50 1.43 (0.90–2.26) 1.44 (0.81–2.57)
Other
Chlorimuron Ethyl4 39 / 28 1.46 (0.95–2.25) 0.82 (0.45–1.49)
Dicamba 39 / 49 1.03 (0.61–1.73) 1.12 (0.59–2.11)
Glyphosate 81 / 78 1.00 (0.59–1.71) 0.94 (0.50–1.77)
Imazethapyr 30 / 41 1.10 (0.62–1.94) 1.09 (0.56–2.11)
Paraquat 31 / 24 1.11 (0.70–1.78) 1.01 (0.52–1.95)
Petroleum oil/distillates 44 / 46 1.13 (0.73–1.75) 1.36 (0.78–2.36)
Fungicides/Fumigants
Benomyl 21 / * 1.52 (0.88–2.62) 1.75 (0.82–3.75)
Captan 13 / 11 1.29 (0.69–2.44) 0.72 (0.26–1.99)
Chlorothalonil 17 / * 1.49 (0.76–2.94) 0.85 (0.29–2.51)
Maneb 15 / * 0.85 (0.46–1.58) 1.44 (0.63–3.27)
Metalaxyl 38 / 23 1.42 (0.88–2.29) 1.05 (0.52–2.09)
Methylbromide 22 / 20 0.85 (0.49–1.48) 1.47 (0.68–3.19)

1Lifetime history ever used specific pesticides at enrollment (1993-1997) or first follow-up (1999-2003) prior to RA diagnosis.

2Among participants with ≥24 months continuous fee for service (FFS) coverage (Parts A and B coverage without Part C), including initial ≥12-month clean period with no claims for rheumatoid arthritis; specialist-confirmed cases had ≥2 claims for RA ≥30 days apart plus ≥1 claim(s) from a rheumatologist. Asterix (*) indicates percent not shown if number or percent not shown due to <11 in a cell or ability to infer the count of groups with <11 exposed cases in conjunction with other data presented.

3Relative Risk estimates calculated using log binomial regression, adjusted for categorical age (40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70+), state (NC, IA), education (≤high school, >high school), and correlated pesticides (R2>0.35): [aldicarb (chlorothalonil and benomyl), chlorothalonil (aldicarb and benomyl), atrazine (alachlor), butylate (cyanazine and metribuzin)].

4Interaction p-values <0.20 for following pesticides by smoking (ever/never): aldrin (intp=0.18), carbofuran (intp =0.07), alachlor (intp=0.08), butylate (intp=0.19), atrazine (intp=0.14), chlorimuron ethyl (intp=0.13).

Additional analyses

Given their frequent application together as product or tank-mixtures, we explored patterns of atrazine, alachlor and metolachlor use in relation to RA (Table 5). Both alachlor and metolachlor were frequently used by those who also used atrazine; 58% of non-cases used atrazine and either alachlor and/or metolachlor, 16% used only atrazine, and 8% used only alachlor and/or metalochlor, while 19% used none of these 3 herbicides. Altogether, compared to non-users, the risk of RA was elevated only among those who used atrazine as well as alachlor and/or metalochlor (1.84; 1.11–3.04).

Table 5.

Risk of RA in relation to combined atrazine with alachlor and/or metolachlor use.

Ever used1: Non-cases2 Specialist-confirmed cases2 Relative Risk1
(N = 22,320) (N = 161) (95% CI)
N (%) N (%)
Atrazine + alachlor and/or metolachlor
None of these 3552 (18) 21 (15) Reference
Alachlor and/or metolachlor, not atrazine 1534 (8) < 11 (*) 1.39 (0.65–2.96)
Atrazine, not metolachlor or alachlor 3056 (16) 20 (15) 1.29 (0.70–2.39)
Atrazine, and alachlor and/or metolachlor 11,269 (58) 88 (63) 1.84 (1.11–3.04)

1Lifetime history ever used specific pesticides at enrollment (1993–1997) or first follow-up (1999–2003) prior to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosis.

2Among participants with ≥ 24 months continuous fee for service (FFS) coverage (Parts A and B coverage without Part C), including an initial ≥ 12-month clean period with no claims for rheumatoid arthritis; specialist-confirmed cases had ≥ 2 claims for RA ≥ 30 days apart plus claims from a rheumatologist. Asterix (*) indicates percent not shown if number or percent not shown due to < 11 in a cell or ability to infer the count of groups with < 11 exposed cases in conjunction with other data presented.

3Relative Risk estimates calculated using log binomial regression, adjusted for categorical age (40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70+), state (NC, IA), education (≤ high school, > high school), and smoking pack year.

In ancillary analyses of overall cases, several associations with ever-use of specific pesticides were upheld (Supplementary Table 2), though the strength of effect estimates were somewhat attenuated, e.g., malathion (RR = 1.43; 95% CI 1.08–1.91), carbofuran (1.34; 1.04–1.72), metolachlor (1.32; 1.03–1.68), and benomyl (1.49; 1.08–2.06). In exposure-response models for cumulative IWLD (Supplementary Table 3), the trend for malathion was completely attenuated (RRs 0.76–1.04, ptrend=0.70), while elevated RRs remained for lower or middle levels of carbofuran (M1 1.40; 1.00-1.97), alachlor (1.38;0.98–1.94), metolachlor (T1 1.56;1.11–2.20), and higher levels of butylate (M2 1.47;1.01–2.43). A new exposure-response was seen for turbufos [(M2 1.37;0.99–1.89) and (M1 1.12;0.77–1.61); ptrend=0.06].

Finally, in a sensitivity analysis using a more stringent definition of incidence (i.e., ≥ 36 months complete continuous FFS coverage, including a clean period of 24 months; N = 14,916 total, 110 specialist confirmed cases), characteristics of incident RA cases were similar to the main analysis sample (Supplementary Table 4), except for lower median days mixed or applied pesticides among both overall and specialist-confirmed cases (though IQRs largely overlapped). In this smaller sample, we saw similar RR (though less precise CI) for specialist-confirmed RA and specific insecticides (Supplementary Table 5): malathion (RR 1.66;95%CI 1.03–2.70), phorate (1.48; 0.98–2.24), and carbaryl (1.51; 0.97–2.36), but decreases in magnitude (> 10%) for the two herbicides, alachlor (1.25; 0.85–1.84) and metolachlor (1.29; 0.87–1.91), while the RR for benomyl was increased by 21% (1.75; 1.05–2.90).

Discussion

This study is the first to investigate use of specific pesticides and the development of specialist-confirmed RA using Medicare claims data linked to AHS participants. In analyses of data from licensed pesticide applicators, we report novel associations with several pesticides not seen in our prior work in male applicators based on self-reported RA questionnaire data with low follow-up response rates14. Our findings include dose-response associations with use of malathion and phorate, two commonly used organophosphate insecticides. We also report associations with two related carbamate insecticides, carbaryl and carbofuran, with a trend for greater IWLD use of carbofuran (but not carbaryl). Our current findings indicate a more complex relationship of RA and the herbicide atrazine than previously reported14, with no trend for overall atrazine use after adjusting for alachlor; but at the same time observed associations of RA with alachlor and metolachlor occurred largely among those who also used atrazine. Finally, we saw a new association of RA risk with the fungicide benomyl. Taken together, these results extend our prior findings in older AHS applicators.

Associations of RA with malathion and carbaryl are notable, as these are the two most commonly used insecticides in the cohort (reported by 73% and 62% of non-cases, and 81% and 75% of cases) and continue to be approved and are commonly used in the U.S. in agriculture and other settings. Although previous results did not indicate an overall association of self-reported RA with malathion, stratified analyses suggested an association (OR 1.55; 95%CI 0.89, 2.69) among those ages ≥ 50 years at AHS enrollment14. The observed exposure-response relationship showing greater risk of specialist-confirmed RA with increasing cumulative IWLD of malathion use supports these results, but this exposure-response was not observed when all cases were included (i.e., also including those with no RA specialist claims); this could suggest the association was specific to rheumatologist treated cases, maybe a more severe phenotype (or the more stringent case definition). The association of RA with ever use of carbaryl was consistent in various sensitivity and ancillary analyses, however we did not confirm prior suggestive findings of exposure-response in self-reported RA14, instead seeing the strongest association among those with lower IWLDs of use. Other evidence of immune- effects of these pesticides in AHS applicators includes an exposure-response association of malathion with shingles risk (including those without a prior RA, other SARD, or leukemia/lymphoma)20. Two highly toxic insecticides, phorate and carbofuran, were also associated with RA in the current study. Phorate could not be evaluated for exposure-response due to small numbers. Carbofuran has not been associated with self-reported RA, other SARD, or shingles in prior AHS investigations; however, in a small study of AHS applicators carbofuran was strongly associated with rare disease-specific extractable nuclear antibodies among those with anti-nuclear antibodies14,2022.

We identified an association of RA with the fungicide benomyl. Although benomyl was not previously associated with self-reported RA14, it was associated with elevated shingles risk among AHS applicators without SARD or leukemia/lymphoma20. Though generally considered of low acute toxicity to mammals, benomyl is no longer used in the U.S. and other countries due to potential risks associated with chronic exposures23, possibly due to its metabolism to carbendazim, which remains widely used as a fungicide in global settings and associated with toxicity in animal models, including developmental, reproductive, endocrine, and hematological effects24. In prior analyses of female spouses, RA was associated with the fungicide maneb15. Both benomyl and maneb are carbamate fungicides, which is notable given associations in this study with other carbamate pesticides, such as carbaryl and carbofuran.

We observed associations of RA with two anilid/aniline herbicides, alachlor and metolachlor, however neither showed a clear exposure-response relationship. We did not confirm an independent association of atrazine with RA; previous results showed a significant trend for lifetime days of atrazine use and RA among male applicators, but these analyses did not adjust for exposure intensity weights or alachlor use14. In the current investigation, associations were most apparent among those using both atrazine and alachlor or metolachlor (commonly used together in product or tank mixtures)., This combined use was not evaluated in our prior analyses. Immune effects of alachlor in the AHS include an exposure-response association with self-reported shingles risk, and alachlor was among the top two pesticides involved in high pesticide exposure events associated with Medicare claims for shingles20,25. Another triazinone herbicide, metribuzin, was associated with RA, albeit at lower IWLD of use. Metribuzin is also used in combination with alachlor and metolachlor and results are consistent with suggestive findings for other immune endpoints in the AHS, including SARD and shingles20,22. Taken together, our results illustrate the importance of considering the combined effects of pesticides that are often used together or substituted over time. Further research is needed to understand risks associated with these herbicides, and the related herbicide acetochlor, approved for use by the Environmental Protection Agency in 1994 and first reported in later phases of AHS follow-up.

Smoking is the best-known environmental risk factor for RA; smoking-associated RA risk may be higher in older adults and males, those with genetic risk factors, and/or occupational exposure to silica and other inhaled substances in the development of RA13,2628. We saw few differences in analyses stratified by history of cigarette smoking (ever versus never), nor evidence of effect modification of pesticide associations with RA by smoking except for two possible interactions (p< 0.10) with carbofuran and alachlor, both showing stronger associations in smokers. Cases who smoked also had a higher percentage who used carbofuran and alachlor, which could indicate an elevated risk profile. Some herbicide associations were also more apparent among smokers (e.g., butylate, atrazine, and another triazine herbicide, cyanazine), while other associations were similar or somewhat more apparent among non-smokers (e.g., malathion, carbaryl, metolachlor, benomyl). Although smoking increases RA risk, we did not hypothesize a particular direction of effect modification. Smoking could be the dominant risk factor in some individuals, perhaps a sufficient cause in the presence of certain genetic risk factors or other respiratory exposures, in which case pesticide associations could be more apparent among individuals developing RA through alternative causal pathways. Conversely, some pesticides may contribute to RA regardless of smoking, or perhaps increase susceptibility for immune dysregulation and autoimmunity together with smoking, genetic risk factors, or other occupational or respiratory exposures. Characterization of genetic risk factors and RA phenotype, and more precise data on the timing of exposures, are needed to better understand the role of pesticides, which might also be addressed by including pesticides in experimental studies of inflammatory arthritis2931.The development of RA may begin years prior to clinical manifestations, with exposures impacting pre-clinical and clinical pathology at different stages in initiation of autoantibodies, epitope spreading, and inflammation32,33. The pesticides identified in the current study have a diverse range of potential non-cancer toxicities, with oral reference doses varying by orders of magnitude (ranging from 1 × 10 −1 for carbaryl, to 5 × 10 −4 for phorate, Supplementary Table 6). Many have neurotoxic effects and permanent or reversible acetylcholinesterase inhibition, and most have endocrine disrupting effects, though affected systems vary. Several pesticides associated with RA in this study may contribute to epigenetic changes and long-term effects on immunity relevant to RA3437. Other pathways may include direct or indirect immunotoxicity resulting in immune dysregulation, inflammation, susceptibility to infections, or dysbiosis of the gut microbiota38,39. Malathion has clear evidence of immunosuppressive effects in experimental studies4042; while exact mechanisms are not always apparent, both organophosphate and carbamate insecticides could manifest as neuroendocrine or immune effects through inhibition of the enzyme acetylcholinesterase43. Other indirect pathways may include impacts on synovitis through actions of carbamate insecticides on the melatonin receptor or other immune effects4446. In addition to impacting neurotransmitters, various types of carbamate pesticides may exert direct and indirect effects on immunity by other pathways44. The lack of exposure-response observed for some pesticides could reflect a variety of scenarios, including low-dose effects (e.g., seen with some endocrine disrupting compounds), competing pathways, or the possibility that exposure intensity or timing relative to different stages of disease pathogenesis may be more important than duration or chronicity of use, or perhaps patterns of combined or substituted use of different pesticides over time. As these relationships are difficult to ascertain in observational human studies, experimental studies can help to address these possibilities. For example, combined atrazine and metolachlor exposure in an amphibian model led to greater thymic damage than either of the chemicals alone47. Further research is needed in experimental models of inflammatory arthritis and autoimmune pathologies.

Strengths of the AHS includes its large sample size of licensed pesticide applicators, prospective design, detailed pesticide data collected prior to RA diagnosis, and exposure-response data including an adjustment for intensity weights based on application methods and the use of personal protective equipment. Self-reported pesticide use in the AHS has been shown to be reliable48. Since exposure is impacted by application methods and use of protective equipment, an algorithm was applied to estimate cumulative IWLD of use, supported by measurement studies49. Complete data on lifetime ILWD at AHS enrollment was available on 22 pesticides (including carbofuran, atrazine, alachlor, metolachlor), while data on 28 others (including malathion, carbaryl, butylate, and metribuzin) were limited to applicators who completed the supplemental take-home questionnaire. The current analyses integrated data on additional pesticide use from the first follow-up survey (1999–2003), but ongoing and new pesticide use is plausible for many applicators who were still farming during follow-up and prior to RA diagnosis. Given ambiguous exposure timing relative to various stages of susceptibility and preclinical disease etiology, it is difficult to predict how misclassification could bias our findings. We limited examination of mixtures to the combination of atrazine with alachlor and/or metolachlor given prior findings of an association of RA with atrazine14. Results showed a stronger association for those who used atrazine together with alachlor and/or metolachlor, and further found that only 8% of non-cases used these herbicides but not atrazine, highlighting the potential influence of sparse data in models of atrazine adjusting for these correlated pesticides. Applicators routinely use more than one pesticide per crop and over time, and future studies may wish to examine other common mixtures and pesticides with similar modes of action, for example the insecticide malathion associated with RA for the first time in this analysis together the insecticide carbaryl, previously found to be associated with RA14. Farmers have higher occupational exposure to most pesticides, so these findings may not be generalized to the population. However, many pesticides associated with RA in this sample are currently approved for general residential or public health uses in the U.S. (e.g., malathion, carbaryl), and thus broadly impact the general population through direct (e.g., personal use) and indirect exposures (e.g., as food residues). Others, including atrazine and metolachlor may also be found in ground water, albeit at low concentrations50,51.

While some of the current findings are consistent with our prior work14, direct comparisons are limited by different study samples and case ascertainment methods. Previously cases were identified by self-reported diagnosis and DMARD use among those completing active follow-up and case confirmation surveys, and a small number with medical-records or validation by their physician. Age is an established risk factor for RA3,4, and the current study sample was older than the prior study sample. Besides being older at AHS enrollment and RA diagnosis, cases based on Medicare claims data in the current analysis were more likely to be from North Carolina (54% versus 43% in the prior study) and were less likely have an education beyond high school (22% vs. 38%) or to be current smokers (12% vs. 21%). Some pesticides were more prevalent in the current study, e.g., carbaryl was used by 75% of Medicare-based cases versus 57% of self-reported cases, which may reflect the inclusion of updated pesticide use data in the first follow-up and the older age of participants. This could yield different exposure distributions and observed exposure-response. Benomyl use, which was associated with RA in the current, and not the prior study, was also more common in Medicare-based cases (20% vs. 7% of self-reported cases). Very few applicators in the current study were female (not shown), while the prior study was limited to males. Altogether, a variety of factors may contribute to divergent results.

Use of Medicare claims data in the current study enabled more complete cohort follow-up and identification of cases based on visits for RA and specialist care. Claims-based algorithms restricting to 2 or more visits can accurately identify RA patients, with enhanced specificity for cases receiving specialist care52,53. We did not use DMARD-prescription data to further validate cases using Part D data, which covers only a fraction of cases starting in 2006; however, care by a rheumatologist is associated with DMARD use54. Our sample lacked those with Part A or Part C-only coverage, so participants could have changed coverage prior to RA diagnosis which might have influenced our findings if they were more or less likely to stay or become enrolled in FFS. In a sample limited to those with at least 36 months continuous FFS, using a stricter definition for incidence, results were not substantially changed. We performed ancillary analyses in overall cases, since some older patients in a rural environment may be less likely to access specialist care19; while most results did not markedly differ, some were attenuated. RA cases in the current study were almost entirely identified using ICD-9 codes, which provide no information on seropositive RA (e.g., based on rheumatoid factor (RF) or anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA)), only recently distinguished in by ICD-10 codes available in Medicare starting October 2015. Given strong associations and interaction of smoking with genetic factors and RF or ACPA-positive RA26, smoking stratified models may reflect possible phenotypic differences.

Compared to baseline models adjusting for age, state, and correlated pesticides, we saw limited evidence of additional confounding by education and smoking. However, residual confounding may occur due to time-varying or passive smoking exposures, for example in childhood. RA risk has also been associated with infections, diet, alcohol use, and body mass index3,4. The latter two factors were not included in final models due to no association with RA in exploratory baseline models, while the former were not evaluated in the current study. Infections linked to RA could exist on the causal pathway, to the extent that the immune response may be modified by acute or chronic pesticides exposures20,25. Farmers experience other immune modifying exposures, such as inorganic and organic dusts, solvents, and UV exposure. Our prior research has shown associations of self-reported RA with applying fertilizers, solvents, or painting55. Other studies suggest a role for diverse inhaled exposures in risk of RA6,13,56. Future studies should explore the interaction of pesticides with associated exposures, e.g., work with animals, and exposures to organic and inorganic (e.g., soil) dusts and potential contaminants57.

In sum, our findings support the hypothesis that specific pesticides may contribute to RA risk. In the AHS-Medicare linked cohort, several pesticides, including some currently approved and commonly used in agricultural, public health, or residential settingsmay increase RA risk among older adults. Replication of these findings in other populations and experimental studies is needed, given the potential implications for other autoimmune diseases and millions of tons of pesticide active ingredients produced and used in the U.S. and globally.

Methods

Population and sample

The study sample was drawn from the Agricultural Health Study (AHS), a prospective cohort of ~ 89,000 licensed pesticide applicators and spouses enrolled from 1993 to 1997 in North Carolina (NC) and Iowa (IA). Details of the enrollment protocol and population characteristics have been previously described58. Applicators enrolled in the cohort when they completed a questionnaire at the time they sought or renewed their pesticide application license (80% response). Enrolled applicators (N = 52,394 private applicators) were given a supplemental questionnaire to complete at home (44% response). Data were collected on demographics, pesticide use, and medical history (http://aghealth.nih.gov/collaboration/questionnaires.html). The current study also updated pesticide use information from the first follow-up survey 1999–2003 (64% response) for those with data on new or ongoing use prior to any RA claims. The study was approved by the institutional review boards of participating institutes (the National Cancer Institution and National Institution of Environmental Health Sciences and is currently approved under continuing review by the National Institutes of Health Institutional Review Board FWA000058, IRB IDOH93NCN013 / MODCR001011). The linkage to claims data was also approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (RSCH 2018–52174, DUA 52174). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all participants following procedures approved by the Institutional Review Board at enrollment and follow-up.

Linkage of the AHS to Medicare administrative healthcare data was completed for 28,057 private applicators, 98% of the Medicare- eligible participants ages ≥ 65 years between 1999 and 201617. Sample derivation for analyses of incident RA is shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. After excluding 5,654 individuals [(20%; 5,415 with < 24 months continuous FFS coverage (i.e., Medicare Parts A and B without Part C managed care insurance), 200 with prevalent RA and 39 with equivocal RA], the eligible study sample included 22,403 applicators. Of these, 319 were identified overall as incident RA cases, including 161 who were confirmed by specialist claims and were the focus of our primary analysis (described below). For statistical modeling, the analysis also excluded 1,968 participants with missing covariates (as listed below; 20,435 remaining).

Case ascertainment

Claims for RA diagnosis included ICD9 7140, 7141, 7142, 71,481 or ICD10 M069, M0500, M0530, M0560, and M0510. Incident cases were identified following ≥ 12 months continuous FFS with no claims for RA and ≥ 12 additional months of continuous FFS. Both prevalent and incident cases were identified based on having ≥ 2 claims for RA ≥ 30 days apart; among these, we enumerated a subset of cases based on having at least one specialist claim for RA (CMS Specialist code 66, i.e., “specialist-confirmed cases”) to increase specificity of this claims-based algorithm52,53. Prevalent cases were identified if they had ≥ 2 claims for RA ≥ 30 days apart during the first 12 months of FFS coverage, while equivocal cases were identified if they had 1 claim for RA (or 2 within 30 days) in the first 12 months, but no additional claims for RA during follow-up.

Pesticide exposure and covariate data

At enrollment applicators were asked about ever-use of 50 pesticides; for 22 of these, further questions asked about categorical frequency (days per year) and duration (years) of use. A supplemental questionnaire asked about duration and frequency for the remaining 28 pesticides. Updated use of all 50 pesticides in the first follow-up survey (1999–2003) was incorporated into exposure data for those completing the survey and who had follow-up time (as cases or non-cases) after the age at completion. Intensity-weighted lifetime days of use (IWLD) was calculated using category midpoints for years and days per year, multiplied by an intensity score incorporating data on factors impacting personal exposures (e.g., personal protective equipment and different application methods)49. We derived categories of IWLD for exploration of exposure response (median split, tertiles, and quartiles) versus never-use based on the percent exposed cases (i.e., median split for 30 < 50%, tertiles for 50 < 70%, and quartiles for ≥ 70% exposed). We did not evaluate exposure-response if the prevalence of use was < 30%.

Covariates included in primary analyses are age at enrollment (40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70+), state (Iowa vs. North Carolina), education (high school or less vs. higher education), and smoking pack-years, and correlated pesticides as described below. Those missing data on state, education, or smoking were excluded from modeling. We included total lifetime days mixed or applied pesticides in Table 5 to provide readers a sense of the distribution of general pesticide use, but they were not considered as potential confounders. Body mass index and current alcohol use showed no association with RA in exploratory models, so were not included as covariates.

Analyses

Our analyses focused on history of ever using of 44 specific pesticide active ingredients with ≥ 11 exposed specialist-confirmed RA cases. We conducted log binomial regression to calculate relative risks (RR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). Models adjusted for age, state, education, and smoking pack-years; for a subset of pesticides, we adjusted for any correlated pesticides with R2 > 0.35 and an effect estimate obtained prior to co-exposure adjustment was 1.20 or greater. Analyses used data releases P1REL201701.00, P2REL201701.00, P3REL201809.00, AHSREL201706.00, and were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).

Exposure response was assessed through visual examination of stepwise increasing RR across increasing categories of IWLD for pesticides (described above). Trend tests used an ordinal variable based on the midpoint of each IWLD category, with never-use as the lowest category. We also explored potential differences in specific pesticide associations (ever use) with RA stratified by smoking history (ever vs. never). Effect measure modification was assessed for descriptive purposes by inclusion of an interaction term of smoking by pesticide use.

We conducted several additional analyses. First, we considered combined herbicide use for atrazine and alachlor or metolachlor, given their frequent use together. In ancillary analyses, we also examined associations in the larger sample of cases (i.e., overall incident cases) regardless of specialist claims. Finally, we conducted an analysis that required continuous FFS coverage (without gaps in available claims data due to lack of insurance or having periods of Part A-only (hospitalization) or Part C/managed care insurance), as well as ≥ 36 months of FFS coverage, following a 24-month clean period, as cases in remission may receive less regular care.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Material 1. (83.3KB, docx)

Author contributions

D.P. and L.B.F. Funded the StudyC.P. and D.S. Conceived of the Study and Wrote the ProposalC.P., D.S., K.C., L.B.F., J.H. Revised and Approved ProposalC.P., D.S., D.L., G.H. Developed the analysis planD.L., G.H. Performed the analysesC.P., D.S., K.C., L.B.F., J.H. Interpreted resultsC.P. Wrote the manuscript text and prepared the tablesC.P., D.S., K.C, L.B.F., J.H., G.H, and D.L Reviewed and revised the paperAll authors approved the manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding provided by the National Institutes of Health

Data availability

The datasets used during these analyses are not publicly available due to policies protecting administrative healthcare claims data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) linked to the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) cohort. Requests to analyze these data can be directed to the corresponding author, and may be granted following study policies, including AHS Executive Committee review (https://aghealth.nih.gov/collaboration/process.html) and a data use agreement approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

This work was supported in part by the intramural research program of the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z01-ES049030) and National Cancer Institute (Z01-CP010119).

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Sparks, J. A. Rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Intern. Med.170 (1), Itc1–itc16 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Safiri, S. et al. Global, regional and national burden of rheumatoid arthritis 1990–2017: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study 2017. Ann. Rheum. Dis.78 (11), 1463–1471 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Finckh, A. et al. Global epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol.18 (10), 591–602 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Klareskog, L., Rönnelid, J., Saevarsdottir, S., Padyukov, L. & Alfredsson, L. The importance of differences; on environment and its interactions with genes and immunity in the causation of rheumatoid arthritis. J. Intern. Med.287 (5), 514–533 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Morotti, A. et al. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on the Association of Occupational Exposure to free crystalline silica and rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol.62 (2), 333–345 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Prisco, L. C., Martin, L. W. & Sparks, J. A. Inhalants other than personal cigarette smoking and risk for developing rheumatoid arthritis. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol.32 (3), 279–288 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gold, L. S., Ward, M. H., Dosemeci, M. & De Roos, A. J. Systemic autoimmune disease mortality and occupational exposures. Arthritis Rheum.56 (10), 3189–3201 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li, X., Sundquist, J. & Sundquist, K. Socioeconomic and occupational risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis: a nationwide study based on hospitalizations in Sweden. J. Rhuematol.35 (6), 986–991 (2008). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lundberg, I. et al. Occupation, occupational exposure to chemicals and rheumatological disease. A register based cohort study. Scand. J. Rheumatol.23 (6), 305–310 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Olsson, A. R., Skogh, T., Axelson, O. & Wingren, G. Occupations and exposures in the work environment as determinants for rheumatoid arthritis. Occup. Environ. Med.61 (3), 233–238 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Parks, C. G., D’Aloisio, A. A. & Sandler, D. P. Childhood residential and agricultural pesticide exposures in relation to adult-onset rheumatoid arthritis in women. Am. J. Epidemiol.187 (2), 214–223 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Parks, C. G. et al. Insecticide use and risk of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus in the women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. Arthritis Care Res.63 (2), 184–194 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tang, B. et al. Occupational inhalable agents constitute major risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis, particularly in the context of genetic predisposition and smoking. Ann. Rheum. Dis.82 (3), 316–323 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Meyer, A., Sandler, D. P., Beane Freeman, L. E., Hofmann, J. N. & Parks, C. G. Pesticide exposure and risk of Rheumatoid Arthritis among Licensed Male Pesticide Applicators in the Agricultural Health Study. Environ. Health Perspect.125 (7), 077010 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Parks, C. G. et al. Rheumatoid arthritis in Agricultural Health Study spouses: associations with pesticides and Other Farm exposures. Environ. Health Perspect.124 (11), 1728–1734 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Walitt, B. T. et al. Validation of self-report of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus: the women’s Health Initiative. J. Rhuematol.35 (5), 811–818 (2008). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Parks, C. G. et al. Completeness of cohort-linked U.S. Medicare data: an example from the Agricultural Health Study (1999–2016). Prev. Med. Rep.27, 101766 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu, X. et al. Impact and timing of Smoking Cessation on reducing risk of rheumatoid arthritis among women in the nurses’ Health studies. Arthritis Care Res.71 (7), 914–924 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Polinski, J. M. et al. Relationships between driving distance, rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drug receipt. Arthritis Care Res.66 (11), 1634–1643 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Parks, C. G., Hofmann, J. N., Beane Freeman, L. E. & Sandler, D. P. Agricultural pesticides and shingles risk in a prospective cohort of licensed Pesticide Applicators. Environ. Health Perspect.129 (7), 77005 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Parks, C. G. et al. Lifetime pesticide use and antinuclear antibodies in male farmers from the Agricultural Health Study. Front. Immunol.10, 1476 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Parks, C. G. et al. Pesticide use and risk of systemic autoimmune diseases in the Agricultural Health Study. Environ. Res.209, 112862 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pearson M.A. MGW. Benomyl. In: P. W, editor. Encyclopedia of Toxicology. Acad. Pres. 411-2 (20214).
  • 24.Zhou, T. et al. Ecological risks, toxicities, degradation pathways and potential risks to human health. Chemosphere. 314, 137723 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Parks, C. G. et al. High pesticide exposures events, pesticide poisoning, and shingles: a medicare-linked study of pesticide applicators in the agricultural health study. Environ. Int.181, 108251 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Källberg, H. et al. Smoking is a major preventable risk factor for rheumatoid arthritis: estimations of risks after various exposures to cigarette smoke. Ann. Rheum. Dis.70 (3), 508–511 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Stolt, P. et al. Silica exposure among male current smokers is associated with a high risk of developing ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis.69 (6), 1072–1076 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Scott, I. C. et al. Predicting the risk of rheumatoid arthritis and its age of onset through modelling genetic risk variants with smoking. PLoS Genet.9 (9), e1003808 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vassallo, R. et al. Cellular and humoral immunity in arthritis are profoundly influenced by the interaction between cigarette smoke effects and host HLA-DR and DQ genes. Clin. Immunol.152 (1–2), 25–35 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Donate, P. B. et al. Cigarette smoke induces miR-132 in Th17 cells that enhance osteoclastogenesis in inflammatory arthritis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A118(1), e2017120118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 31.Fu, J. et al. Shared epitope-aryl hydrocarbon receptor crosstalk underlies the mechanism of gene-environment interaction in autoimmune arthritis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 115 (18), 4755–4760 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sokolove, J. et al. Autoantibody epitope spreading in the pre-clinical phase predicts progression to rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One. 7 (5), e35296 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sparks, J. A. & Karlson, E. W. The roles of cigarette smoking and the lung in the transitions between phases of preclinical rheumatoid arthritis. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep.18 (3), 15 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hoang, T. T. et al. Epigenome-wide DNA methylation and Pesticide Use in the Agricultural Lung Health Study. Environ. Health Perspect.129 (9), 97008 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Navarrete-Meneses, M. D. P. et al. Exposure to Insecticides Modifies Gene Expression and DNA Methylation in Hematopoietic Tissues In Vitro. Int J Mol Sci. 26;24(7), 6259 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 36.Alexander, M. et al. Pesticide use and LINE-1 methylation among male private pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study. Environ. Epigenet. 3 (2), dvx005 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Glossop, J. R. et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling in rheumatoid arthritis identifies disease-associated methylation changes that are distinct to individual T- and B-lymphocyte populations. Epigenetics. 9 (9), 1228–1237 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Clemente, J. C., Manasson, J. & Scher, J. U. The role of the gut microbiome in systemic inflammatory disease. Bmj. 360, j5145 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Giambò, F., Teodoro, M., Costa, C. & Fenga, C. Toxicology and Microbiota: How Do Pesticides Influence Gut Microbiota? A Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 21;18(11), 5510(2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 40.Banerjee, B. D., Pasha, S. T., Hussain, Q. Z., Koner, B. C. & Ray, A. A comparative evaluation of immunotoxicity of malathion after subchronic exposure in experimental animals. Indian J. Exp. Biol.36 (3), 273–282 (1998). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Galloway, T. & Handy, R. Immunotoxicity of organophosphorous pesticides. Ecotoxicol. (London England). 12 (1–4), 345–363 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nain, S., Bour, A., Chalmers, C. & Smits, J. E. Immunotoxicity and disease resistance in Japanese quail (corturnix coturnix japonica) exposed to malathion. Ecotoxicol. (London England). 20 (4), 892–900 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cox, M. A. et al. Beyond neurotransmission: acetylcholine in immunity and inflammation. J. Intern. Med.287 (2), 120–133 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dhouib, I. et al. From immunotoxicity to carcinogenicity: the effects of carbamate pesticides on the immune system. Environ. Sci. Pollut Res. Int.23 (10), 9448–9458 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Popovska-Gorevski, M., Dubocovich, M. L. & Rajnarayanan, R. V. Carbamate insecticides Target Human Melatonin receptors. Chem. Res. Toxicol.30 (2), 574–582 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cutolo, M., Straub, R. H. & Bijlsma, J. W. Neuroendocrine-immune interactions in synovitis. Nat. Clin. Pract. Rheumatol.3 (11), 627–634 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hayes, T. B. et al. Pesticide mixtures, endocrine disruption, and amphibian declines: are we underestimating the impact?. Environ. Health Perspect.114(Suppl 1(Suppl 1)), 40–50 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hoppin, J. A., Yucel, F., Dosemeci, M. & Sandler, D. P. Accuracy of self-reported pesticide use duration information from licensed pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study. J. Expo Anal. Environ. Epidemiol.12 (5), 313–318 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Coble, J. et al. An updated algorithm for estimation of pesticide exposure intensity in the agricultural health study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 8 (12), 4608–4622 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Smalling, K. L. et al. Environmental and anthropogenic drivers of contaminants in agricultural watersheds with implications for land management. Sci. Total Environ.774, 145687 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bexfield, L. M., Belitz, K., Lindsey, B. D., Toccalino, P. L. & Nowell, L. H. Pesticides and Pesticide degradates in Groundwater used for Public Supply across the United States: occurrence and human-health context. Environ. Sci. Technol.55 (1), 362–372 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chung, C. P., Rohan, P., Krishnaswami, S. & McPheeters, M. L. A systematic review of validated methods for identifying patients with rheumatoid arthritis using administrative or claims data. Vaccine. 31 (Suppl 10), K41–61 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kim, S. Y. et al. Validation of rheumatoid arthritis diagnoses in health care utilization data. Arthritis Res. Ther.13 (1), R32 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bonafede, M. M., Fox, K. M., Johnson, B. H., Watson, C. & Gandra, S. R. Factors associated with the initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective claims database study. Clin. Ther.34 (2), 457–467 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Parks, C. G., Meyer, A., Beane Freeman, L. E., Hofmann, J. N. & Sandler, D. P. Farming tasks and the development of rheumatoid arthritis in the agricultural health study. Occup. Environ. Med.76 (4), 243–249 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Luedders, B. A., Mikuls, T. R., Thiele, G. M., Poole, J. A. & England, B. R. Inhalant and additional mucosal-related environmental risks for rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum. Dis. Clin. North. Am.48 (4), 781–798 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lupolt, S. N. et al. A qualitative characterization of meso-activity factors to estimate soil exposure for agricultural workers. J. Expo Sci. Environ. Epidemiol.33 (1), 140–154 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Alavanja, M. C. et al. The Agricultural Health Study. Environ. Health Perspect.104 (4), 362–369 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1. (83.3KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used during these analyses are not publicly available due to policies protecting administrative healthcare claims data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) linked to the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) cohort. Requests to analyze these data can be directed to the corresponding author, and may be granted following study policies, including AHS Executive Committee review (https://aghealth.nih.gov/collaboration/process.html) and a data use agreement approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES