Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA logoLink to Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
. 1994 Jan-Feb;1(1):61–74. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95236137

Terms used by nurses to describe patient problems: can SNOMED III represent nursing concepts in the patient record?

S B Henry 1, W L Holzemer 1, C A Reilly 1, K E Campbell 1
PMCID: PMC116185  PMID: 7719788

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the terms used by nurses in a variety of data sources and to test the feasibility of using SNOMED III to represent nursing terms. DESIGN: Prospective research design with manual matching of terms to the SNOMED III vocabulary. MEASUREMENTS: The terms used by nurses to describe patient problems during 485 episodes of care for 201 patients hospitalized for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia were identified. Problems from four data sources (nurse interview, intershift report, nursing care plan, and nurse progress note/flowsheet) were classified based on the substantive area of the problem and on the terminology used to describe the problem. A test subset of the 25 most frequently used terms from the two written data sources (nursing care plan and nurse progress note/flowsheet) were manually matched to SNOMED III terms to test the feasibility of using that existing vocabulary to represent nursing terms. RESULTS: Nurses most frequently described patient problems as signs/symptoms in the verbal nurse interview and intershift report. In the written data sources, problems were recorded as North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) terms and signs/symptoms with similar frequencies. Of the nursing terms in the test subset, 69% were represented using one or more SNOMED III terms.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bulechek G. M., McCloskey J. C. Nursing interventions: what they are and how to choose them. Holist Nurs Pract. 1987 May;1(3):36–44. doi: 10.1097/00004650-198705000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell J. R., Kallenberg G. A., Sherrick R. C. The clinical utility of META: an analysis for hypertension. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992:397–401. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cimino J. J. Representation of clinical laboratory terminology in the Unified Medical Language System. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991:199–203. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark J., Lang N. Nursing's next advance: an internal classification for nursing practice. Int Nurs Rev. 1992 Jul-Aug;39(4):109-11, 128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fries J. F. The chronic disease data bank model: a conceptual framework for the computer-based medical record. Comput Biomed Res. 1992 Dec;25(6):586–601. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(92)90012-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Graves J. R., Corcoran S. The study of nursing informatics. Image J Nurs Sch. 1989 Winter;21(4):227–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1989.tb00148.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Henry S. B., Holzemer W. L., Reilly C. A. Nurses' perspectives on problems of hospitalized PCP patients: implications for the development of a nursing taxonomy. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991:177–181. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Holzemer W. L., Henry S. B., Stewart A., Janson-Bjerklie S. The HIV quality audit marker (HIV-QAM): an outcome measure for hospitalized AIDS patients. Qual Life Res. 1993 Apr;2(2):99–107. doi: 10.1007/BF00435729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lang N. M., Marek K. D. The classification of patient outcomes. J Prof Nurs. 1990 May-Jun;6(3):158–163. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(05)80146-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lang N. M., Marek K. D. The policy and politics of patient outcomes. J Nurs Qual Assur. 1991 Jan;5(2):7–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Marek K. D. Outcome measurement in nursing. J Nurs Qual Assur. 1989 Nov;4(1):1–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sato L., McClure R. C., Rouse R. L., Schatz C. A., Greenes R. A. Enhancing the Metathesaurus with clinically relevant concepts: anatomic representations. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992:388–391. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stewart A. L., Hays R. D., Ware J. E., Jr The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care. 1988 Jul;26(7):724–735. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198807000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wilson H. S., Skodol A. E. DSM-III-R: introduction and overview of changes. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 1988 Apr;2(2):87–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zielstorff R. D., Cimino C., Barnett G. O., Hassan L., Blewett D. R. Representation of nursing terminology in the UMLS Metathesaurus: a pilot study. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992:392–396. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES