Skip to main content
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA logoLink to Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
. 1994 May-Jun;1(3):207–217. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95236153

Toward a medical-concept representation language. The Canon Group.

D A Evans 1, J J Cimino 1, W R Hersh 1, S M Huff 1, D S Bell 1
PMCID: PMC116200  PMID: 7719804

Abstract

The Canon Group is an informal organization of medical informatics researchers who are working on the problem of developing a "deeper" representation formalism for use in exchanging data and developing applications. Individuals in the group represent experts in such areas as knowledge representation and computational linguistics, as well as in a variety of medical subdisciplines. All share the view that current mechanisms for the characterization of medical phenomena are either inadequate (limited or rigid) or idiosyncratic (useful for a specific application but incapable of being generalized or extended). The Group proposes to focus on the design of a general schema for medical-language representation including the specification of the resources and associated procedures required to map language (including standard terminologies) into representations that make all implicit relations "visible," reveal "hidden attributes," and generally resolve ambiguous or vague references. The Group is proceeding by examining large numbers of texts (records) in medical sub-domains to identify candidate "concepts" and by attempting to develop general rules and representations for elements such as attributes and values so that all concepts may be expressed uniformly.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dunham G. S., Henson D. E., Pacak M. G. Three solutions to problems of categorized medical nomenclatures. Methods Inf Med. 1984 Apr;23(2):87–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Evans D. A., Hersh W. R., Monarch I. A., Lefferts R. G., Handerson S. K. Automatic indexing of abstracts via natural-language processing using a simple thesaurus. Med Decis Making. 1991 Oct-Dec;11(4 Suppl):S108–S115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Friedman C., Alderson P. O., Austin J. H., Cimino J. J., Johnson S. B. A general natural-language text processor for clinical radiology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994 Mar-Apr;1(2):161–174. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95236146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gabrieli E. R. A new electronic medical nomenclature. J Med Syst. 1989 Dec;13(6):355–373. doi: 10.1007/BF00995672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Masarie F. E., Jr, Miller R. A., Bouhaddou O., Giuse N. B., Warner H. R. An interlingua for electronic interchange of medical information: using frames to map between clinical vocabularies. Comput Biomed Res. 1991 Aug;24(4):379–400. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(91)90035-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McCray A. T., Aronson A. R., Browne A. C., Rindflesch T. C., Razi A., Srinivasan S. UMLS knowledge for biomedical language processing. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1993 Apr;81(2):184–194. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McMahon L. F., Jr, Smits H. L. Can Medicare prospective payment survive the ICD-9-CM disease classification system? Ann Intern Med. 1986 Apr;104(4):562–566. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-4-562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rector A. L., Nowlan W. A., Glowinski A. Goals for concept representation in the GALEN project. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993:414–418. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Saint-Yves I. F. The Read Clinical Classification. Health Bull (Edinb) 1992 Nov;50(6):422–427. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES