Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the performances of online and compact-disc (CD-ROM) versions of the National Library of Medicine's (NLM) MEDLINE database. DESIGN: Analytic survey. INTERVENTION: Clinical questions were drawn from 18 searches originally conducted spontaneously by clinicians from wards and clinics who had used Grateful Med Version 4.0. Clinicians' search strategies were translated to meet the specific requirements of 13 online and 14 CD-ROM MEDLINE systems. A senior librarian and vendors' representatives constructed independent searches from the clinicians' questions. The librarian and clinician searches were run through each system, in command mode for the librarian and menu mode for clinicians, when available. Vendor searches were run through the vendors' own systems only. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Numbers of relevant and irrelevant citations retrieved, cost (for online systems only), and time. RESULTS: Systems varied substantially for all searches, and for librarian and clinician searches separately, with respect to the numbers of relevant and irrelevant citations retrieved (p < 0.001 for both) and the cost per relevant citation (p = 0.012), but not with respect to the time per search. Based on combined rankings for the highest number of relevant and the lowest number of irrelevant citations retrieved, the SilverPlatter CD-ROM MEDLINE clinical journal subset performed best for librarian searches, while the PaperChase online system worked best for clinician searches. For cost per relevant citation retrieved, Dialog's Knowledge Index performed best for both librarian and clinician searches. CONCLUSIONS: There were substantial differences in the performances of competing MEDLINE systems, and performance was affected by search strategy, which was conceived by a librarian or by clinicians.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cahan M. A. GRATEFUL MED: a tool for studying searching behavior. Med Ref Serv Q. 1989 Winter;8(4):61–79. doi: 10.1300/J115v08n01_07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haynes R. B., McKibbon K. A., Walker C. J., Mousseau J., Baker L. M., Fitzgerald D., Guyatt G., Norman G. R. Computer searching of the medical literature. An evaluation of MEDLINE searching systems. Ann Intern Med. 1985 Nov;103(5):812–816. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-103-5-812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haynes R. B., McKibbon K. A., Walker C. J., Ryan N., Fitzgerald D., Ramsden M. F. Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings. A study of use and usefulness. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jan 1;112(1):78–84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-112-1-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haynes R. B., Ramsden M. F., McKibbon K. A., Walker C. J. Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings: impact of user fees. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1991 Oct;79(4):377–381. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McKibbon K. A., Haynes R. B., Dilks C. J., Ramsden M. F., Ryan N. C., Baker L., Flemming T., Fitzgerald D. How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? A comparative study of clinical end-user and librarian searches. Comput Biomed Res. 1990 Dec;23(6):583–593. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(90)90042-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Porter D., Wigton R. S., Reidelbach M. A., Bleich H. L., Slack W. V. Self-service computerized bibliographic retrieval: a comparison of Colleague and PaperChase, programs that search the MEDLINE data base. Comput Biomed Res. 1988 Oct;21(5):488–501. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(88)90007-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stead W. W., Haynes R. B., Fuller S., Friedman C. P., Travis L. E., Beck J. R., Fenichel C. H., Chandrasekaran B., Buchanan B. G., Abola E. E. Designing medical informatics research and library--resource projects to increase what is learned. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994 Jan-Feb;1(1):28–33. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95236134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walker C. J., McKibbon K. A., Haynes R. B., Johnston M. E. Performance appraisal of online MEDLINE access routes. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992:483–487. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilczynski N. L., Walker C. J., McKibbon K. A., Haynes R. B. Assessment of methodologic search filters in MEDLINE. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993:601–605. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]