Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA logoLink to Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
. 1994 Sep-Oct;1(5):361–371. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95153424

Costs and benefits of picture archiving and communication systems.

S H Becker 1, R L Arenson 1
PMCID: PMC116218  PMID: 7850560

Abstract

A picture archiving and communication system (PACS) is an electronic and ideally filmless information system for acquiring, sorting, transporting, storing, and electronically displaying medical images. PACS have developed rapidly and are in operation in a number of hospitals. Before widespread adoption of PACSs can occur, however, their cost-effectiveness must be proven. This article introduces the basic components of a PACS. The current PACS cost-analysis literature is reviewed. Some authors conclude that the PACS would pay for itself, while others find the PACS much more expensive. Explanations for these differences are explored. Almost all of these studies focus on direct costs and ignore indirect costs and benefits. The literature characterizing the indirect costs of PACS is reviewed. The authors conclude that there is a need for uniform, well-defined criteria for the calculation of the costs and savings of PACSs.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arenson R. L., Chakraborty D. P., Seshadri S. B., Kundel H. L. The digital imaging workstation. Radiology. 1990 Aug;176(2):303–315. doi: 10.1148/radiology.176.2.2367643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arenson R. L., Seshadri S. B., Kundel H. L., DeSimone D., Van der Voorde F., Gefter W. B., Epstein D. M., Miller W. T., Aronchick J. M., Simson M. B. Clinical evaluation of a medical image management system for chest images. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988 Jan;150(1):55–59. doi: 10.2214/ajr.150.1.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakker A. R. HIS, RIS, and PACS. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1991 May-Jun;15(3):157–160. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-76566-7_18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beard D., Parrish D., Stevenson D. A cost analysis of film image management and four PACS based on different network protocols. J Digit Imaging. 1990 May;3(2):108–118. doi: 10.1007/BF03170570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cho P. S., Huang H. K., Tillisch J., Kangarloo H. Clinical evaluation of a radiologic picture archiving and communication system for a coronary care unit. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988 Oct;151(4):823–827. doi: 10.2214/ajr.151.4.823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crowe B. L. Overview of some methodological problems in assessment of PACS. Int J Biomed Comput. 1992 May;30(3-4):181–186. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(92)90019-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. De Simone D. N., Kundel H. L., Arenson R. L., Seshadri S. B., Brikman I. S., Khalsa S. S., Davey M. J., Brisbon N. E. Effect of a digital imaging network on physician behavior in an intensive care unit. Radiology. 1988 Oct;169(1):41–44. doi: 10.1148/radiology.169.1.3420281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Giribona P., Bravar D., Stacul F., Ukovich W. PACS experiences in Trieste. Int J Biomed Comput. 1992 May;30(3-4):285–293. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(92)90037-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hilsenrath P. E., Smith W. L., Berbaum K. S., Franken E. A., Owen D. A. Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of PACS. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Jan;156(1):177–180. doi: 10.2214/ajr.156.1.1898556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hindel R. PACS cost justification: an industry perspective. Med Inform (Lond) 1990 Jan-Mar;15(1):77–82. doi: 10.3109/14639239009025257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ho B. K., Ratib O., Horii S. C. PACS workstation design. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1991 May-Jun;15(3):147–155. doi: 10.1016/0895-6111(91)90003-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Horii S. C., Mun S. K., Levine B., Lo B., Garra B. S., Zeman R. K., Freedman M., Leftridge C., Schellinger D., Keyes J. PACS clinical experience at Georgetown University. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1991 May-Jun;15(3):183–190. doi: 10.1016/0895-6111(91)90008-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Irie G., Miyasaka K. Clinical experience--16 months of HU-PACS. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1991 May-Jun;15(3):191–195. doi: 10.1016/0895-6111(91)90009-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kangarloo H. PACS--clinical experience at UCLA. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1991 May-Jun;15(3):201–203. doi: 10.1016/0895-6111(91)90011-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kundel H. L., Seshadri S. B., Arenson R. L. Clinical experience with PACS at the University of Pennsylvania. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1991 May-Jun;15(3):197–200. doi: 10.1016/0895-6111(91)90010-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lou S. L., Huang H. K. Assessment of a neuroradiology picture archiving and communication system in clinical practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992 Dec;159(6):1321–1327. doi: 10.2214/ajr.159.6.1442409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stewart B. K., Honeyman J. C., Dwyer S. J., 3rd Picture archiving and communication system (PACS) networking: three implementation strategies. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1991 May-Jun;15(3):161–169. doi: 10.1016/0895-6111(91)90005-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Straub W. H., Gur D. The hidden costs of delayed access to diagnostic imaging information: impact on PACS implementation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Sep;155(3):613–616. doi: 10.2214/ajr.155.3.2117364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Warburton R. N. Digital imaging at a community hospital: implications for hospital stays and teleradiology. Int J Biomed Comput. 1991 Jul-Aug;28(3):169–180. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(91)90053-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Warburton R. N. Evaluation of PACS-induced organizational change. Int J Biomed Comput. 1992 May;30(3-4):243–248. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(92)90028-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Warburton R. N., Fisher P. D., Nosil J., Brauer G. W., Lawrence W. J., Ritchie G. W. Digital diagnostic imaging with a comprehensive PACS: hypothetical economic evaluation at a large community hospital. J Digit Imaging. 1990 May;3(2):101–107. doi: 10.1007/BF03170569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. van Gennip E. M., Bakker A. R., Greberman M. Do the benefits outweigh the costs of PACS? The results of an International Workshop on Technology Assessment of PACS. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1992 May;37(4):265–271. doi: 10.1016/0169-2607(92)90037-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. van Gennip E. M., Heiska K., Kemerink G. J., Ratib O., Rechid R., van den Broeck R., van Erning L. J., van Poppel B. M., Verra W. J., Warburton R. Overview of CAPACITY data. Int J Biomed Comput. 1992 May;30(3-4):173–180. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(92)90018-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. van Poppel B. M., Bakker A. R., Wilmink J. B. A package for cost and critical analysis of picture archiving and communication indicating its true yield (CAPACITY). Med Inform (Lond) 1990 Jan-Mar;15(1):67–75. doi: 10.3109/14639239009025256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. van der Loo R. P., van Gennip E. M. Evaluation of personnel savings through PACS: a modelling approach. Int J Biomed Comput. 1992 May;30(3-4):235–241. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(92)90027-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES