Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Develop a prototype expert system for preterm birth risk assessment of pregnant women. Normal gestation involves a term of 40 weeks, but because 8-12% of the newborns in the United States are delivered prior to 37 weeks' gestation, problems associated with prematurity continue to plague individuals, families, and the health care system. DESIGN: A knowledge-base development methodology used machine learning, statistical analysis, and validation techniques to analyze three large datasets (18,890 subjects and 214 variables). The dependent (i.e., decision) variable studied was weeks of gestation at delivery, with dichotomous coding of preterm delivery (prior to 37 weeks) and full-term delivery (37+ weeks). RESULTS: Machine learning with a program named Learning from Examples using Rough Sets (LERS) induced 520 usable rules that were entered into a prototype expert system. The prototype expert system was 53-88% accurate in predicting preterm delivery for 9,419 patients. CONCLUSION: The prototype expert system was more accurate than traditional manual techniques in predicting preterm birth.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (920.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Alexander G. R., Weiss J., Hulsey T. C., Papiernik E. Preterm birth prevention: an evaluation of programs in the United States. Birth. 1991 Sep;18(3):160–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1991.tb00088.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fieschi M. Towards validation of expert systems as medical decision aids. Int J Biomed Comput. 1990 Jul;26(1-2):93–108. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(90)90022-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson P. E. What kind of expert should a system be? J Med Philos. 1983 Feb;8(1):77–97. doi: 10.1093/jmp/8.1.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lockwood C. J., Senyei A. E., Dische M. R., Casal D., Shah K. D., Thung S. N., Jones L., Deligdisch L., Garite T. J. Fetal fibronectin in cervical and vaginal secretions as a predictor of preterm delivery. N Engl J Med. 1991 Sep 5;325(10):669–674. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199109053251001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McGregor J. A., French J. I., Richter R., Franco-Buff A., Johnson A., Hillier S., Judson F. N., Todd J. K. Antenatal microbiologic and maternal risk factors associated with prematurity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Nov;163(5 Pt 1):1465–1473. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90607-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McLean M., Walters W. A., Smith R. Prediction and early diagnosis of preterm labor: a critical review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1993 Apr;48(4):209–225. doi: 10.1097/00006254-199304000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosen M. G., Merkatz I. R., Hill J. G. Caring for our future: a report by the expert panel on the content of prenatal care. Obstet Gynecol. 1991 May;77(5):782–787. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woolery L., Grzymala-Busse J., Summers S., Budihardjo A. The use of machine learning program LERS-LB 2.5 in knowledge acquisition for expert system development in nursing. Comput Nurs. 1991 Nov-Dec;9(6):227–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]