Skip to main content
BMJ Open logoLink to BMJ Open
. 2024 Dec 5;14(12):e089741. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089741

Prevalence of cataract and its associated factors among adults aged 40 years and above living in Durame town, Southern Ethiopia, 2023: a community-based cross-sectional study

Ashenafi Abebe Latebo 1, Natnael Lakachew Assefa 2, Tarekegn Wuletaw Ferede 3, Matiyas Mamo Bekele 2,, Ketemaw Zewdu Demilew 2
PMCID: PMC11624767  PMID: 39638584

Abstract

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to assess the prevalence of cataract and associated factors among adults aged 40 years and above in Durame town, Southern Ethiopia.

Design

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted using a systematic random sampling method.

Setting

The study was conducted in Durame town, Southern Ethiopia.

Participants

The study included 734 adults aged ≥40 years who lived in Durame town for more than 6 months.

Main outcome measures

Data were collected using face-to-face interviews completed by an interviewer and ophthalmic examinations.

Results

A total of 734 study participants aged 40 years and above were involved. The prevalence of cataract was 29.16% (95% CI: 25.89% to 32.59%). Factors associated with the prevalence of cataract were older age of 70–95 years (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=8.60, 95% CI: 3.09 to 23.90), being diabetic (AOR=2.27, 95% CI: 1.37 to 3.74), exposure to sunlight (AOR=2.83, 95% CI: 1.45 to 5.53), trauma to eye (AOR=2.39, 95% CI: 1.19 to 4.81), hypertension (AOR=1.86, 95% CI:1.16 to 2.99) and glaucoma (AOR=5.36,95% CI: 3.13 to 9.18).

Conclusion

The prevalence of cataract was lower than previous national survey results. Old age, known history of trauma to eye, hypertension, diabetes, exposure to sunlight and glaucoma had statistically significant association with cataract.

Keywords: Prevalence, Cataract and refractive surgery, Myopia


STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY.

  • This study provided up-to-date evidence on the magnitude and factors associated with cataract to reduce blindness in Southern Ethiopia.

  • This study demonstrates the temporal association between predictive factors and cataracts, not the actual causation.

  • Since the study mainly focuses on quantitative data, it provides limited information on the qualitative aspects and their impact relationship.

Introduction

Cataract is a condition where the eye’s lens becomes cloudy, leading to blurred vision and possibly blindness.1 Opacification occurring on or inside the lens can impede the amount of light entering the retina, causing a reduction in vision that correlates with the degree of opacification.2 Cataracts can be either congenital or acquired, with the latter resulting from various factors such as ageing, metabolic disorders, trauma, intraocular inflammation and ocular or systemic conditions.3 Cataracts are most common in elderly individuals, with age-related cataracts being the most prevalent.4

Globally, cataracts are the leading cause of blindness and the second-leading cause of moderate and severe visual impairment. Over 100 million people worldwide are affected by cataracts, with 17 million cases resulting in blindness.5 Nearly 70 million people worldwide experience bilateral blindness or moderate to severe visual impairment due to cataracts.6 As the ageing population grows, cataract-related blindness is increasing, putting more pressure on healthcare systems.7 The number of people who are blind due to cataracts is increasing as a result of population growth and longer lifespans.8 In 2020, there were an estimated 15.2 million blind people aged 50 and over, and an additional 78.8 million individuals with moderate and severe visual impairment due to cataracts worldwide.9 However, individuals living in low-income countries face a higher burden of cataracts due to limited access to cataract surgery.10

Cataract-related blindness is widespread in developing countries due to high service costs and limited access to surgery. We must act to ensure equal healthcare access for everyone.11 Access to relatively simple and cost-effective treatment for cataracts is limited in low-income and middle-income countries, where over 90% of people with visual impairment due to cataracts reside.12 Cataract surgery is currently the only treatment available that can effectively address all types of cataracts.13 Due to limited eye care facilities, high user fees and transportation costs, many people have poor access to eye care services.12

The prevalence of cataracts in people aged 40 and older ranges from 11.8% to 18.8%.10 Cataracts are a major public health concern in sub-Saharan Africa, accounting for over 46% of blindness cases, and 52.4% and 70.6% of moderate and severe visual impairments due to cataracts, respectively.14 The 2005/2006 national survey on blindness and low vision in Ethiopia identified cataracts as the leading cause of blindness (49.9%) and low vision (42.3%). Cataracts in adults over 40 can lead to secondary glaucoma and uveitis, increased dependency and decreased mobility, economic loss, mortality, decreased quality of life and increased risk of failure.15 16

Evidence has shown several risk factors associated with cataract, including smoking, marital status, educational status, diabetes, sunlight exposure, high body mass index, steroid use, increasing age and female gender.17

Cataract is currently the primary cause of blindness and visual impairment in Ethiopia.18 Despite existing studies on cataract prevalence in Ethiopia, most have been conducted in hospitals, with only one study being community based. This highlights a significant gap in research, particularly regarding the prevalence of cataracts in southern Ethiopia, including the study area. This study aims to address this gap by assessing the proportions of cataracts and the factors associated with them in patients aged 40 years and above. Understanding the prevalence of cataracts and the related factors in the population is crucial for preventing visual impairment and effectively implementing the VISION 2030 program in Ethiopia.

Method and materials

Study design, period and area

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Durame town, located in southeastern Ethiopia, between 25 April 2023 and 30 May 2023. Durame is the administrative centre of the Kembata Tembaro Zone and is situated 112 km away from Hawassa, the capital of Sidama regional state and 280 km away from Addis Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia. The town has a latitude and longitude of 7°14′N 37°53′E and an elevation of 2101 m above sea level. The average temperature in Durame ranges from 16.5°C to 29.8°C. According to the Durame town health office, the town has three kebeles, which are the smallest administrative units in Ethiopia: Lalo, Kasha and Zeraro. The current total population of Durame is 65 852, with 31 367 being males and 34 485 being females. Adults aged 40 years and above account for 21 257 of the total population. The town has 10 248 households distributed across the three kebeles. Despite the presence of enough health facilities in the town, there is only one eye-care centre that does not provide cataract surgery services (obtained from Durame town health office unpublished source).

Study population and eligibility criteria

All adults aged ≥40 years who lived in Durame town for more than 6 months and were available during the data collection period were included in the study. However, adults who have bilateral pseudophakia, Phthitic (enucleated) eyes and bilateral corneal opacity which prevent to visualise crystalline lens were excluded from the study.

Patient and public involvement

Patients and/or the public were not involved in the study design, conduct of the study or plan to disseminate the result of this study to the study participants.

Sample size determination and sampling procedures

The sample size was determined using the single population proportion formula n=(Zα/2)2×P(1P)d2 with the following consideration (n=sample size, Z=the value of z statistic at 95% confidence level=1.96, p=the estimated proportion of cataract from previous study=20.1%,19 d=margin of error of ±3% and 10% non-response rate. The final sample size was determined to be 755. There were three kebeles (the smallest administrative unit) found in Durame town. A systematic random sampling technique was applied to select the required study participants from those three kebeles. The households were selected after calculating the sampling interval (K-value). The calculated sampling interval was 13 (k=10 248/755=13.57). The first household was chosen using a simple random sampling method (lottery method). Then, one adult aged 40 years and above was recruited in every 13th household. If more than one adult of aged 40 years and above were found adults in one household, lottery method was used to select one. An immediate next-door household was included in the interview when there was no eligible person who fulfilled the inclusion criteria at the selected household.

Operational definitions

Cataract

A clouding or loss of transparency of the lens within the posterior capsule, nucleus and/or cortex of the eye is revealed with slit lamp examination of the crystalline lens.20

Cataracts

A nuclear cataract (NC) was identified with a Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS III) score greater than 4 for nuclear opalescence (NO) or greater than 4 for NC. Similarly, a cortical cataract (CC) was indicated by an LOCS III score greater than 2 for CC, while a significant posterior subcapsular cataract (PSC) was identified with an LOCS III score greater than 2.21

Visual impairment

Functional limitation of eyes or visual system due to visual disorder or disease that can result in a visual disability or a visual hand cap with a presenting visual acuity of <6/12.22

Cigarette smoking

Individuals are classified as smokers if they have smoked more than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime, and as non-smokers if they have smoked fewer than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime and have no current history of smoking.23

Sunlight exposure

Participants who are exposed to sunlight for 6 hours or more per day are considered exposed whereas those with sunlight exposure less than 6 hours per day are considered non-exposed.23

Sleeping duration

Participants who considered exposed if the individual slept for more than 6 hours and non-exposed if the individual slept for 6 hours or less per day.23

Diabetic mellitus

If the individual has/had a known diagnosed diabetic mellitus or undergoing antidiabetic therapy.24

Systemic hypertension

If the individual has/had a known diagnosed hypertension or undergoing antihypertensive therapy.25

Glaucoma

If the individual has/had known diagnosed glaucoma or undergoing antiglaucoma therapy.26

Myopia

If the individual has/had a known diagnosed myopia.27

Data collection tool and procedure

The eligible participants were interviewed through an interviewer-administered questionnaire after taking informed written consent. The questionnaire covered sociodemographics and other relevant variables. The questionnaire was adapted from various literature and administered by a trained ophthalmic nurse practitioner. Two optometrists conducted an examination using Snellen’s visual acuity chart, portable slit lamp biomicroscope and direct ophthalmoscopes. The data collection process was supervised by the principal investigator. The principal investigator provided 1 day of training to the data collectors on data collection techniques, instrument use and how to maintain ethical standards. A pretest was conducted on 5% (37) of the sample size in Angacha before the actual data collection to check for completeness, appropriateness and common understanding. Modifications were made accordingly. To ensure the quality of the data, the PI closely supervised the data collection procedure on a daily basis. A review was conducted in the field to check the completeness of the questionnaire, and any corrections were made in the field. The data were then coded for data management. Data cleaning and cross-checking were also done before data analysis.

Grading of lens images

Lens opacities were assessed using the LOCS III by experienced optometrists. After dilating the pupils with tropicamide eye-drops (1%), cataract grading was performed using a portable slit lamp biomicroscope while referencing LOCS III standard photographs. The examiner identified specific lens opacities and assigned a severity grade. The severity of lens opacities was categorised into four main groups: NO, NC, CC and PSC.

Statistical analysis

The data collected were exported to Stata V.14 for analysis. Descriptive statistics, such as frequency and percentage, were used to summarise the data. To check the multicollinearity of variables, the variance inflation factor and the tolerance test were used. To determine the factors associated with cataract, binary logistic regression was applied. Variables with a p<0.2 in the bivariable analysis were included in the multivariable regression analysis. The goodness of the model fit was tested using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Variables with a p<0.05 in the multivariable logistic regression analysis were considered statistically significant at the 95% CI.

Result

Sociodemographic data of study participants

A total of 734 study participants were involved in this study giving a response rate of 97.2%. The mean age of the study participants was 58.6 years with ±12.4 SD.

From the total study participants, 390 (53.13%) were males. About 484 (65.94%) were married. About 158 (21.53) were unable to read and write and 198 (26.98%) study participants were government employees (table 1).

Table 1. Sociodemographic and economic characteristics of study participants aged 40 years and above in Durame town, Southern Ethiopia, 2023 (n=734).

Variables Categories Frequency %
Age 40–49 174 23.71
50–59 229 31.20
60–69 205 27.93
70–95 years 126 17.16
Sex Male 390 53.13
Female 344 46.87
Marital status Never married 66 8.99
Married 484 65.94
Divorced or separated 48 6.54
Widowed 136 18.53
Educational status Unable to read and write 158 21.52
Primary school 115 15.67
Secondary school 253 34.47
College and above 208 28.34
Health insurance Yes 339 46.19
No 395 53.81
Monthly income (ETB) <2000 371 50.54
2000–5999 166 22.62
≥6000 197 26.84

ETBEthiopian birr

Health-related data of adult participants

About 143 (19.48%) of study participants had a family history of cataract, 171 (23.30%) had diabetes mellitus, 271 (36.92) had systemic hypertension and 156 (21.25%) had glaucoma (table 2).

Table 2. Health-related data of the study participants aged 40 years and above in Durame town, Southern Ethiopia, 2023 (n=734).

Variables Categories Frequency %
Family history of cataract Yes 143 19.48
No 591 80.52
Diabetes mellitus Yes 171 23.30
No 563 76.70
Systemic hypertension Yes 271 36.92
No 463 63.08
Glaucoma Yes 156 21.25
No 578 78.75
Myopia Yes 175 23.84
No 559 76.16
Steroid use Yes 139 18.94
No 595 81.06
Visual impairment Normal 377 51.36
Mild 85 11.58
Moderate 106 14.44
Severe 92 12.53

Health behaviour and environmental factors of participants

Of the total study participants, 37 (5.04%) were cigarette smokers and 156 (21.25%) had a history of eye trauma (table 3).

Table 3. Health behaviour/lifestyle and environmental factors among study participants aged 40 years and above in Durame town, Southern Ethiopia, 2023 (n=734).

Variables Categories Frequency %
Smoking cigarette Yes 37 5.04
No 697 94.96
Sleep duration Exposed 113 15.40
Non-exposed 621 84.60
Exposure to sunlight Non-exposed 147 20.03
exposed 587 79.97
Trauma Yes 156 21.25
No 578 78.75

nsample size

Prevalence of cataract

The prevalence of cataract among study participants of aged 40 years and above in Durame town was 29.16% (95% CI: 25.89% to 32.59%).

Prevalence of different type of lens opacity

Of the total number of participants, 8.86% had posterior subcapsular opacity, 0.27% had nuclear opacity, 11.99% had cortical opacity and the remaining had combination of the above.

Factors associated with cataract

In bivariable binary logistic regression factors: Age, marital status, educational status, monthly income, smoking, eye trauma, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, glaucoma, steroid medication, myopia and sunlight exposure were associated with cataract at a p§amp;lt;0.25. Then, multivariable binary logistic regression was used to assess the relative effect of the independent variables on the outcome variable. In multivariable analysis factors such as age, known history of trauma to the eye, diabetic mellitus, hypertension, exposure to sunlight and glaucoma had significant association with cataract.

The odds of having cataract among study participants aged 70–95 years was 8.60 (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=8.60, 95% CI: 3.09 to 23.90) times higher compared with participants aged 40–49 years. On the other hand, the odds of having cataract in adults aged 50–59 years was 2.74 (AOR=2.74, 95% CI: 1.16 to 6.48) times higher compared with aged 40–49 years.

The odds of having cataract was 2.27 (AOR=2.27, 95% CI: 1.37 to 3.74) times higher among diabetic participants when compared with participants who did not have diabetic mellitus. In adults who spend6 hours per day on average sunlight, the odds of having cataract was 2.83 (AOR=2.83, 95% CI: 1.45 to 5.53) times higher compared with those adults who spend less than 6 hours per day. The odds of having cataract in adults who had known history of trauma to the eye in their lifetime was 2.39 (AOR=2.39, 95% CI: 1.19 to 4.81) times higher compared with those who did not have a history of trauma to the eye in their lifetime.

The odds of having cataract in adults with systemic hypertension were 1.86 (AOR=1.86, 95% CI: 1.16 to 2.99) times higher than in adults who did not have systemic hypertension. In adults who had glaucoma, the odds of having cataract was 5.36 (AOR=5.36, 95% CI: 3.13 to 9.18) times higher when compared with adults without glaucoma history (table 4).

Table 4. Factors associated with cataract among study participants aged 40 years and above in Durame town, Southern Ethiopia, 2023 (n=734).

Variable Cataract
Yes No COR (95% CI) AOR (95%CI) P value
Age
 40–49 11 163 1 1
 50–59 40 189 3.14 (1.56 to 6.31) 2.74 (1.16 to 6.48) 0.022
 60–69 83 122 10.08 (5.15 to 19.73) 5.65 (2.37 to 13.46) <0.0001
 70–95 years 80 46 25.77 (12.67 to 52.43) 8.60 (3.09 to 23.90) <0.0001
Marital status
 Never married 5 61 1 1
 Married 135 349 4.72 (1.86 to 12.00) 0.64 (0.19 to 2.15) 0.475
 Divorced or separated 12 36 4.07 (1.32 to 12.48) 0.57 (0.13 to 2.42) 0.445
 Widowed 62 74 10.22 (3.87 to 27.02) 0.57 (0.15 to 2.13) 0.403
Education status
 Unable to read and write 83 75 1 1
 Primary school 40 75 0.48 (0.29 to 0.79) 0.81 (0.41 to 1.61) 0.548
 Secondary school 41 212 0.17 (0.11 to 0.28) 0.53 (0.24 to 1.18) 0.121
 College and above 50 158 0.29 (0.18 to 0.45) 1.05 (0.29 to 3.79) 0.938
Smoking cigarette
 No 205 492 1 1
 Yes 9 28 0.77 (0.36 to 1.66) 1.46 (0.54 to 3.95) 0.452
Eye trauma
 No 133 445 1 1
 Yes 81 75 3.61 (2.50 to 5.23) 2.39 (1.19 to 4.81) 0.014
Diabetes mellitus
 No 118 445 1 1
 Yes 96 75 4.83 (3.35 to 6.94) 2.27 (1.37 to 3.74) 0.001
Systemic hypertension
 No 84 379 1 1
 Yes 130 141 4.16 (2.97 to 5.82) 1.86 (1.16 to 2.99) 0.011
Glaucoma
 No 112 44 1 1
 Yes 102 476 11.88 (7.89 to 17.88) 5.36 (3.13 to 9.18) <0.0001
Steroid use
 No 176 419 1 1
 Yes 38 101 0.90 (0.59 to 1.35) 0.85 (0.40 to 1.81) 0.680
Myopia
 No 118 441 1 1
 Yes 96 79 3.01 (2.15 to 4.20) 1.52 (0.93 to 2.49) 0.093
Sunlight exposure
 Non-exposed 60 87 1 1
 Exposed 154 433 0.52 (0.35 to 0.75) 2.83 (1.45 to 5.53) 0.002
Monthly income (ETB)
 <2000 115 256 1.25 (0.85 to 1.84) 0.74 (0.23 to 2.38) 0.615
 2000–5999 47 119 1.10 (0.69 to 1.75) 1.27 (0.50 to 3.22) 0.619
 ≥6000 52 145 1 1

AORadjusted odds ratioCORcrude odds ratioETBEthiopian birrnsample size

Discussion

The finding of this study showed that prevalence of cataract among adults was 29.16% (95% CI: 25.89% to 32.59%) which was in line with the study conducted in Malaysia 26.8%.28 This might be due to similarities in study population which was done in older populations, study design and ocular examination of study participants.

However, this study finding was much lower than the studies conducted in Debre Markos 57%,20 Ghana 48.9%,29 South Africa 44%,30 Northern Indian31 and in Korea 87.8%.32 The differences in results may be attributed to variations in study settings, geographical locations and the characteristics of study populations among participants. For example, studies conducted in Debre Markos, Ethiopia20 and Ghana were institutional based, which may lead to an overestimation of cataract prevalence. Additionally, the populations in the studies from Northern India31 and Korea32 consisted of adults aged 50 years and older, which is older than the population in our study. Age is one of the most significant risk factors for cataracts, as indicated by various studies. Moreover, the research conducted in Northern India specifically focused on diabetic populations, contributing to a higher prevalence of cataracts in that study compared with ours.

The prevalence of cataract in this study was higher compared with studies conducted in Ethiopia 20.1%,19 Nigeria 19.8%,32 Southwestern Nigeria 2%,33 Poland 12.10%26 and Korea 25.2%.32 This discrepancy may stem from variations in sociodemographic characteristics of the study populations, as well as differences in study settings and the availability and accessibility of cataract surgical services in those areas.

In this study, older age was significantly associated with cataract. This finding was similar to studies conducted in Whagmira, Ethiopia,19 Ghana,29 Nigeria,32 India,34 China35 and Korea.15 As people age, the cell membranes, including the lens epithelial cells, which are responsible for maintaining the balance of ions and metabolism of the entire lens, may become damaged. This can lead to an accumulation of fluid inside the lens. Additionally, abnormal differentiation of lens fibres and the formation of protein aggregates can occur, both of which contribute to the development of cataracts.36

This study found a significant association between exposure to sunlight and cataract, which is consistent with a study done in Korea.15 This is because exposure to ultraviolet radiation can harm lens proteins and cells, leading to cataract formation due to oxidative stress damage.37

Having history of diabetic mellitus was significantly associated with cataract in this study. There was similar evidence in studies conducted in South Africa,30 Sankara Nethralayia India,38 Singapore28 and Poland.26 This could be due to high blood sugar (blood glucose) levels can create an imbalance of water content in the crystalline lens that can accelerate the development of cataracts.39

In this study, known systemic hypertension was associated with cataract. This result is consistent with findings of Korean study.15 Cataract development is closely related to systemic inflammation and hypertension. Inflammatory mechanism can lead to conformational changes in proteins in the lens capsules, exacerbating cataract formation. Certain antihypertensive medications can also induce cataracts.25

In this study, having a history of glaucoma was significantly associated with cataract. This similar association was observed in a study conducted in Lodz, Poland.26 There is no direct link between cataracts and glaucoma, although treatment of glaucoma can accelerate cataract formation in certain situations.40

History of trauma to the eye in the lifetime of the adult was significantly associated with cataract. This association is consistent with a study conducted in Whagmira, Ethiopia.19 The possible reason might be that trauma to the eye can disrupt the normal physiological condition of the crystalline lens. This can be caused by damage to the epithelial membrane, leading to an increase in fluid influx into the lens. As a result, the lens fibres become swollen and thickened, ultimately leading to the development of cataracts.41 If the trauma is caused by an electric shock, cataracts may result from the coagulation of proteins and osmotic changes that occur in the crystalline lens.42

Strengths and limitations of the study

This study provided up-to-date evidence on proportion and associated factors of cataract among adults aged 40 years and above living in Durame Town, Southern Ethiopia. This is important to raise awareness about cataracts and their risk factors among the population. Understanding these factors can lead to early detection and treatment, potentially reducing the burden of visual impairment in the community. Being a cross-sectional study, this study demonstrates the temporal association between predictive factors and cataracts, not the actual causation. Since the study mainly focuses on quantitative data, it provides limited information on the qualitative aspects and their impact relationship.

Conclusion

In this study, the prevalence of cataract was lower than previous national survey results. Besides, older age, known history of trauma to eye, hypertension, diabetes, exposure to sunlight and glaucoma had statistically significant association with cataract.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our appreciation to the study participants for their willingness to participate in this study. Authors would also like to acknowledge the dedicated data collectors.

Footnotes

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Prepublication history for this paper is available online. To view these files, please visit the journal online (https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089741).

Patient consent for publication: Not applicable.

Ethics approval: This study involves human participants. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee at University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital, and School of Medicine. A letter of support was provided by the administration of Durame town. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants after detailed explanation of the purpose of the study. Written informed consent was approved by the ethical review committee at University of Gondar, and the ethical approval number was 622/05/2023. All included participants were informed of their right to withdraw from the study at any time during the interview. No risk was taken for the selected study participants. Confidentiality was maintained by not using personal identifiers in the data collection tools and by password protecting the data on a computer. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Patient and public involvement: Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

Contributor Information

Ashenafi Abebe Latebo, Email: ashuabebe71@gmail.com.

Natnael Lakachew Assefa, Email: natiuog@gmail.com.

Tarekegn Wuletaw Ferede, Email: tarieeneye@gmail.com.

Matiyas Mamo Bekele, Email: matthiasm2013@gmail.com.

Ketemaw Zewdu Demilew, Email: zewdukt@gmail.com.

Data availability statement

All data are relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information

References

  • 1.Nizami AA, Gulani AC, Redmond SB. Cataract (nursing) 2021. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Grzybowski A, Markeviciute A, Zemaitiene R. A narrative review of intraocular lens opacifications: update 2020. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:1547. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Heidar K. Cataracts in children, congenital and acquired. American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Delbarre M, Froussart-Maille F. Signs, symptoms, and clinical forms of cataract in adults. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2020;43:653–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2019.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Burton MJ, Ramke J, Marques AP, et al. The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health: vision beyond 2020. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9:e489–551. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30488-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Correia M, Das T, Magno J, et al. Prevalence and causes of blindness, visual impairment, and cataract surgery in Timor-Leste. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:2125–2131. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S146901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mencucci R, Stefanini S, Favuzza E, et al. Beyond vision:Cataract and health status in old age, a narrative review. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023;10:1110383. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1110383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Arrigo A, Leveziel N, Briant PS, et al. Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by cataract: a meta-analysis from 2000 to 2020. Diabetes. 2024;5:9. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-02961-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pesudovs K, Lansingh VC, Kempen JH, et al. Cataract-related blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over time in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62:3523. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fang R, Yu Y-F, Li E-J, et al. Global, regional, national burden and gender disparity of cataract: findings from the global burden of disease study 2019. BMC Public Health. 2022;22:2068. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14491-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee CM, Afshari NA. The global state of cataract blindness. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017;28:98–103. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jolley E, Virendrakumar B, Pente V, et al. Evidence on cataract in low- and middle-income countries: an updated review of reviews using the evidence gap maps approach. Int Health. 2022;14:i68–83. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihab072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Anbesse DH, Bizuneh ZY, Girum W, et al. Vision Related Quality of Life among Cataract Patients Attending Cataract Surgery Campaigns in Ethiopia: A Dual Centre Study. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;13:1–6. doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S324267. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xulu-Kasaba ZN, Kalinda C. Prevalence of blindness and its major causes in sub-Saharan Africa in 2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Vis Impair. 2022;40:563–77. doi: 10.1177/02646196211055924. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Borges L de L, Santos FPV dos, Pagotto V, et al. Functional disability in community-dwelling elderly: the role of cataracts and contextual factors. Fisioter mov. 2014;27:189–200. doi: 10.1590/0103-5150.027.002.AO04. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fang Z, Chen X-Y, Lou L-X, et al. Socio-economic disparity in visual impairment from cataract. Int J Ophthalmol. 2021;14:1310–4. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.09.03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kulkarni A, Banait S. Through the Smoke: An In-Depth Review on Cigarette Smoking and Its Impact on Ocular Health. Cureus. 2023;15:e47779. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tegegn MT, Assaye AK, Belete GT, et al. Visually significant cataract and associated factors among older people attending a community ophthalmic service in central Gondar Zone, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. J Int Med Res. 2022;50:3000605221104761. doi: 10.1177/03000605221104761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ahmed M, Beletew B, Mengesha A, et al. Prevalence of cataract and its associated factors among adults aged 40 years and above in Waghimra zone, Amhara, Northeast Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study. 2020. [DOI]
  • 20.Wale MZ, Derbew M, Tilahun M, et al. Cataract and associated factors among adults visiting ophthalmic clinic at Debre Markos comprehensive specialized hospital, northwest Ethiopia, 2020. SAGE Open Med. 2021;9:2050312121989636. doi: 10.1177/2050312121989636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Singh S, Pardhan S, Kulothungan V, et al. The prevalence and risk factors for cataract in rural and urban India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019;67:477–83. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1127_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Organization WH . World report on vision. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Na K-S, Park Y-G, Han K, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for age-related and anterior polar cataracts in a Korean population. PLoS One. 2014;9:e96461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kiziltoprak H, Tekin K, Inanc M, et al. Cataract in diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes. 2019;10:140–53. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v10.i3.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yu X, Lyu D, Dong X, et al. Hypertension and risk of cataract: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e114012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nowak MS, Smigielski J. The Prevalence of Age-Related Eye Diseases and Cataract Surgery among Older Adults in the City of Lodz, Poland. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:605814. doi: 10.1155/2015/605814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Du Y, Meng J, He W, et al. Challenges of refractive cataract surgery in the era of myopia epidemic: a mini-review. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023;10:1128818. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1128818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yap JF, Ng QX, Wai YZ, et al. Prevalence of cataract and factors associated with cataract surgery uptake among older persons in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study from the National Eye Survey II. Trop Doct. 2022;52:325–30. doi: 10.1177/00494755221076649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yawson AE, Ackuaku-Dogbe EM, Seneadza NAH, et al. Self-reported cataracts in older adults in Ghana: sociodemographic and health related factors. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:949. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Khoza LB, Nunu WN, Tshivhase SE, et al. Survey on prevalence of cataract in selected communities in Limpopo Province of South Africa. Sci Afr. 2020;8:e00352. doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00352. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Vashist P, Tandon R, Murthy GVS, et al. Association of cataract and sun exposure in geographically diverse populations of India: The CASE study. First Report of the ICMR-EYE SEE Study Group. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0227868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mahdi AM, Rabiu M, Gilbert C, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for lens opacities in Nigeria: results of the national blindness and low vision survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:2642–51. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Phaswana-Mafuya N, Peltzer K, Crampin A, et al. Prevalence of Self-Reported Diagnosed Cataract and Associated Risk Factors among Elderly South Africans. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14:1523. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vashist P, Talwar B, Gogoi M, et al. Prevalence of Cataract in an Older Population in India. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:272–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.05.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tang Y, Ji Y, Ye X, et al. The Association of Outdoor Activity and Age-Related Cataract in a Rural Population of Taizhou Eye Study: Phase 1 Report. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0135870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wei Z, Gordon P, Hao C, et al. Aged Lens Epithelial Cells Suppress Proliferation and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition-Relevance for Posterior Capsule Opacification. Cells. 2022;11:2001. doi: 10.3390/cells11132001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.National Eye Institute New research sheds light on how UV rays may contribute to cataract. 2014
  • 38.Badrinath SS, Narayanan A, Hussaindeen JR, et al. The Sankara Nethralaya Community model - Technology and evidence based comprehensive quality eye care equally to all. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68:288–90. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_34_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Harahap J, Rania R. Cataracts Risk Factors and Comparison of Blood Glucose Levels in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients towards the Occurrence of Cataracts. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7:3359–62. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kyari F. Managing cataract surgery in patients with glaucoma. Community Eye Health. 2019;31:88–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Strenk LM, Guo S, Lu K, et al. Force of lifelong crystalline lens growth: chronic traumatic mechanical insult to the choroid. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48:342–8. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Khadka S, Byanju R, Ranabhat S. Cataract following electric shock - Case report. J Kath Med Coll. 2019;8:167–70. doi: 10.3126/jkmc.v8i3.29726. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    All data are relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information


    Articles from BMJ Open are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

    RESOURCES