Abstract
Adjusting for risk factors, severity of illness, and complexity of care is important when comparing and interpreting outcomes. Current and future approaches for examining risk factors, severity of illness, and complexity of care are described within the contexts of administrative, economic, and clinical outcomes. Reasons why the current standardized instruments, computerized severity systems, and workload/intensity measurements, when used alone, are inadequate for outcomes monitoring are proposed. A more comprehensive model for outcomes monitoring is required, one that adjusts outcomes for risk factors, severity of illness, and complexity of care.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (791.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bachrach M. K., Ballesteros P., Black A. N., Clark G. M., Dolley P., Garrick E., Pilotte J., McKinnon H. Q. Using patient outcomes to define nursing practice. Nurs Adm Q. 1988 Winter;12(2):45–51. doi: 10.1097/00006216-198801220-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bond S., Thomas L. H. Issues in measuring outcomes of nursing. J Adv Nurs. 1991 Dec;16(12):1492–1502. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1991.tb01598.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Credé W. B., Hierholzer W. J., Jr Mortality rates as a quality indicator: a simple answer to a complex question. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988 Jul;9(7):330–332. doi: 10.1086/645865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Donabedian A. The role of outcomes in quality assessment and assurance. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992 Nov;18(11):356–360. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30560-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ellwood P. M. Shattuck lecture--outcomes management. A technology of patient experience. N Engl J Med. 1988 Jun 9;318(23):1549–1556. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198806093182327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gonnella J. S., Louis D. Z., McCord J. J. The staging concept--an approach to the assessment of outcome of ambulatory care. Med Care. 1976 Jan;14(1):13–21. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197601000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hays B. J. Nursing care requirements and resource consumption in home health care. Nurs Res. 1992 May-Jun;41(3):138–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hegyvary S. T. Issues in outcomes research. J Nurs Qual Assur. 1991 Jan;5(2):1–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly K. C., Huber D. G., Johnson M., McCloskey J. C., Maas M. The Medical Outcomes Study: a nursing perspective. J Prof Nurs. 1994 Jul-Aug;10(4):209–216. doi: 10.1016/8755-7223(94)90022-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knaus W. A., Zimmerman J. E., Wagner D. P., Draper E. A., Lawrence D. E. APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med. 1981 Aug;9(8):591–597. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198108000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lohr K. N. Outcome measurement: concepts and questions. Inquiry. 1988 Spring;25(1):37–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacKenzie T. A., Reynolds D., Greenaway-Coates A. Hospital reimbursement in Alberta: outcomes management is on the way. Healthc Manage Forum. 1992 Winter;5(4):21–27. doi: 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)61314-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCormick K. A. Future data needs for quality of care monitoring, DRG considerations, reimbursement and outcome measurement. Image J Nurs Sch. 1991 Spring;23(1):29–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1991.tb00631.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prescott P. A. DRG prospective reimbursement: the nursing intensity factor. Nurs Manage. 1986 Jan;17(1):43–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wagner D. P., Draper E. A. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) and Medicare reimbursement. Health Care Financ Rev. 1984;Suppl:91–105. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]