ABSTRACT
Background
Skin aging is characterized by an imbalance between the generation and degradation of extracellular matrix molecules (ECM). Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are the primary enzymes responsible for ECM breakdown. Intrinsic and extrinsic stimuli can induce different MMPs. However, there is limited literature especially on the summary of skin MMPs and potential inhibitors.
Objective
We aim to focus on the upregulation of MMP expression or activity in skin cells following exposure to UV radiation. We also would like to offer valuable insights into potential clinical applications of MMP inhibitors for mitigating skin aging.
Methods
This article presents the summary of prior research, which involved an extensive literature search across diverse academic databases including Web of Science and PubMed.
Results
Our findings offer a comprehensive insight into the effects of MMPs on skin aging after UV irradiation, including their substrate preferences and distinct roles in this process. Additionally, a comprehensive list of natural plant and animal extracts, proteins, polypeptides, amino acids, as well as natural and synthetic compounds that serve as inhibitors for MMPs is compiled.
Conclusion
Skin aging is a complex process influenced by environmental factors and MMPs. Research focuses on UV‐induced skin damage and the formation of Advanced Glycosylation End Products (AGEs), leading to wrinkles and impaired functionality. Inhibiting MMPs is crucial for maintaining youthful skin. Natural sources of MMP inhibitor substances, such as extracts from plants and animals, offer a safer approach to obtain inhibitors through dietary supplements. Studying isolated active ingredients can contribute to developing targeted MMP inhibitors.
Keywords: extracellular matrix breakdown, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP), MMP inhibitors, skin aging
1. Introduction
The skin, which consists of the outermost layer known as the epidermis, the thicker and more elastic middle layer called the dermis, and the inner layer of subcutaneous tissue, serves as the body's largest organ that facilitates our interaction with the environment [1]. The process of skin aging is a consequence of the combined effects of intrinsic and extrinsic factors, encompassing exposure to solar radiation, air pollution, tobacco consumption, inadequate nutritional intake, and inappropriate use of cosmetics [2]. Light plays a pivotal role in sustaining life and exhibits a close association with skin health. In 1969, the initial hypothesis proposed that sun exposure could potentially result in skin damage and accelerate aging [3]. Sun exposure encompasses ultraviolet (UV) radiation, which can elicit cutaneous heat stress.
The extracellular matrix (ECM), which fills intercellular spaces and acts as a communication conduit between cells and organisms, encompasses a multitude of molecules within the skin, including proteoglycans, glycosaminoglycans, structural proteins (such as collagen and elastin), adhesion proteins (such as fibronectin and laminin), along with proteases such as matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) [4]. Imbalance in ECM components is commonly associated with skin aging. The restoration of ECM levels to their normal state has been widely acknowledged as an effective approach for mitigating the process of skin aging. Strategies encompass the inhibition of MMP function, along with the stimulation of collagen and elastin secretion.
MMPs play a pivotal role in the regulation of ECM, and elevated expressions and/or activities of MMPs are frequently associated with skin aging. This review comprehensively examines the roles of MMPs in skin aging, provides an extensive list of substances capable of inhibiting MMP activity to decelerate skin aging, reviews specific targeted MMPs along with their potential signaling pathways, and discusses the prospects of these substances as food, medicine, or skincare products for mitigating skin aging.
2. Collagen and Elastin are the Most Important Components of Skin ECM
Collagen and elastin are the primary constituents of the ECM that provide structural support to the skin. Collagen accounts for 30% of the total ECM proteins in our bodies, imparting strength and stability to various tissues including skin, muscles, bones, and connective tissues. Type I and type III collagens are predominantly localized in the skin, with type I representing approximately 90% of body collagen content. The dermis, comprising around 70%–80% collagen composition, confers remarkable structural integrity to the skin. Moreover, collagen fibrils possess unique properties such as sliding and realignment capabilities that ensure maintenance of skin integrity while allowing deformation without causing damage [5]. Elastin, despite being a minor constituent, plays a crucial role in endowing the skin with elasticity by facilitating its capacity to revert to its original state following external forces [5].
Skin aging is intricately associated with the dysregulation between the accumulation and degradation of ECM components, which provide structural and functional support to the skin tissue. In this review, we consider ECM degradation as an indicator of collagen and elastin fiber breakdown. In youthful, healthy skin, collagen synthesis occurs continuously while damaged or excessive collagen undergoes degradation. However, during the process of aging, there is a decline in collagen synthesis capacity leading to gradual loss of collagen content. This highlights the significance of maintaining a balanced turnover of ECM in delaying skin aging.
3. The Proteases that Degrade the ECM
The degradation of the ECM is primarily mediated by three types of proteases, namely MMPs, plasmin, and cathepsins. Among these proteases, MMPs exert significant influence on ECM degradation.
MMPs are zinc‐dependent enzymes initially discovered in the tails of tadpoles [6]. MMPs play a pivotal role in maintaining the homeostasis of the ECM in the skin by effectively degrading collagen and potentially facilitating elastin degradation. Furthermore, they actively participate in diverse biological and physiological processes including embryogenesis, morphogenesis, angiogenesis, and wound healing [4]. Dysregulated MMP activity is implicated in a myriad of pathological conditions, encompassing inflammation, tissue damage, fibrosis, aberrant angiogenesis, matrix destabilization, microglial activation, autoimmune diseases, and carcinogenesis [7].
MMPs are synthesized by a variety of skin cell types, including fibroblasts, keratinocytes, macrophages, endothelial cells, mast cells, and eosinophils [8]. In humans, there are 25 distinct MMPs that can be categorized based on their substrate specificity or cellular localization: collagenases (MMP‐1, MMP‐8, MMP‐13, and MMP‐18), gelatinases (MMP‐2 and MMP‐9), stromelysins (MMP‐3 and MMP‐10), matrilysins (MMP‐7 and MMP‐26), furin‐containing secreted MMPs (MMP‐11, MMP‐21, and MMP‐28), membrane‐type I MT‐MMPs (MMP‐14, MMP‐15, MMP‐16, and MMP‐24), GPI anchored MT‐MMP (MMP‐17 and MMP‐25), and type II MT‐MMP like the case of MMP‐23 [9], as well as other miscellaneous forms of MMP (MMP‐12, MMP‐19, MMP‐20, MMP‐22, and MMP‐27).
The proteolytic enzyme plasmin plays a crucial role in the dissolution of blood clots by specifically degrading fibrin within the body. Moreover, plasmin has been reported to exhibit its capability of degrading various basement membrane proteins, such as laminin and fibronectin, both of which are components of the skin ECM [10, 11]. The activation of MMPs, including MMP‐1, MMP‐2, MMP‐3, MMP‐9, MMP‐13, and MMP‐14, is also facilitated by plasmin‐mediated degradation of the ECM [12]. Additionally, specific members within the cathepsin family have been identified as degraders of ECM proteins, specifically targeting type I collagen, type IV collagen, fibronectin, and laminin [13, 14]. In this review, our primary focus will be on discussing MMPs, with no further discussion of plasmin and cathepsins.
4. Exposure to UV Radiation Induces the Expression of MMPs
Ultraviolet exposure, extensively researched, is an integral facet of daily life and demands our attention. The ultraviolet radiation reaching the earth's surface encompasses both short and long wavelengths; UVA (320–400 nm) and UVB (280–320 nm) are the two most extensively investigated types. UVA represents the predominant UV ray that reaches the Earth's surface, while UVB exhibits higher intensity. Exposure to UV radiation can lead to sunburn, DNA damage, and suppression of the immune system. Prolonged exposure to UV induces molecular and cellular damage to normal skin structure, resulting in premature skin aging (photoaging), as well as the development of skin cancers such as melanoma, basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) [15, 16].
UV radiation is widely acknowledged as the primary determinant of skin photoaging, characterized by epidermal thickening, textural coarseness, pronounced wrinkles, and dyspigmentation patterns [3]. The involvement of UV radiation in the upregulation of MMPs in fibroblasts has been hypothesized, with both UVA and UVB radiations capable of inducing the expression and secretion of MMPs [17, 18], and enhanced MMP activity is considered a pivotal factor contributing to age‐related skin aging. Moreover, UV radiation induces an excessive generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which bind to cytokine receptors on the cell membrane and activate mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) family proteins, including extracellular signal‐regulated kinases (ERK). ERK stimulates the expression of c‐Fos, which forms AP‐1 with c‐Jun and binds to MMP promoters for transcriptional regulation [19, 20, 21]. Additionally, UVB irradiation can induce the upregulation of a membrane‐bound metalloprotease known as neutral endopeptidase (NEP), or neprilysin, which is involved in the degradation and disruption of elastin's three‐dimensional structure, ultimately resulting in skin wrinkling or sagging [22, 23].
Studies have demonstrated that MMPs exhibit distinct responses to different wavelengths of UV radiation, particularly in relation to specific types of skin cells. Specifically, it has been found that UVB rays (280–320 nm) more readily induce MMP‐1, MMP‐3, and MMP‐10 compared to UVA1 rays (long UVA 340–400 nm). Both UVB and UVA1 were observed to similarly induce MMP‐9; however, it is noteworthy that UVA1 exhibited potent induction of MMP‐12 [24]. Interestingly, exposure of human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK) cells to UVA radiation at a dose of 30 J/cm2 resulted in the significant inhibition of both MMP‐2 and MMP‐9 activities [15], which contrasts with the response observed in fibroblasts.
Sun exposure not only results in the presence of UV radiation but also induces an elevation in skin temperature, thereby causing thermal stimulation. Previous studies have demonstrated that heat shock triggers the activation of MMP‐1 and MMP‐3 (but not MMP‐2) in cultured dermal human fibroblasts through ERK and JNK signaling pathways, along with autocrine IL‐6 expression [25]. Additionally, it has been observed that thermal stimulation induces the generation of ROS in epidermal cells, thereby promoting the upregulation of tropoelastin expression while concurrently increasing fibrillin‐1 expression; however, a reduction in fibrillin‐1 expression is noted specifically in dermal cells [26]. Downstream signaling upon UV radiations and the events upon MMP activations are briefly summarized in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1.

UV‐induced MMP activation and photoaging.
5. The Role of MMPs in Skin Aging
MMPs exhibit distinct preferences for various types of collagens. MMP‐1, MMP‐8, and MMP‐13 possess the capability to degrade fibrillar collagen. In contrast, MMP‐2 and MMP‐9 exhibit the ability to digest collagen types I and IV. However, it is noteworthy that MMP‐3, MMP‐10, and MMP‐11 lack the capacity to cleave collagen type I; instead, they may function as activators for other forms of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Moreover, both MMP‐7 and MMP‐26 are capable of degrading collagen type IV with the former also demonstrating elastin breakdown capabilities. Lastly, MT‐MMPs such as MMP‐14 and MMP‐16 specifically target fibrillar collagen type I as their substrate [27].
Typically, MMPs exhibit distinct tissue‐specific expression patterns and substrate specificities; however, compensatory mechanisms can be observed among certain MMP isoforms [28].
5.1. The Collagenases
The collagenases comprise MMP‐1, MMP‐8, MMP‐13, and MMP‐18. Notably, the pivotal role of MMP‐1 in photoaging is attributed to its ability to induce UV radiation‐mediated expression and subsequent cleavage of type I and type III collagen. Moreover, stromelysins such as MMP‐3 and MMP‐9 further degrade the cleaved collagen [29]. Following UV irradiation, there was a threefold increase in the degradation of collagen within 24 h in the skin. Moreover, IL‐6 secretion from UVA‐exposed keratinocytes could enhance UVA‐induced upregulation of MMP‐1 activity in dermal fibroblasts [30].
Although MMP‐1, MMP‐8, and MMP‐13 exhibit the ability to degrade native fibrillar type I and type III collagen, recent studies have revealed that in UV‐mediated skin collagen damage, there is no significant disparity between the roles of MMP‐8 and MMP‐1. While UV light induces a slight increase in the expression of MMP‐8, another collagenase known as MMP‐13 does not demonstrate substantial upregulation in UV‐exposed skin compared to control [31]. The basal expression of MMP‐13 is typically low or undetectable in normal adult tissues; however, its expression is upregulated in response to tissue repair. TGF‐β can induce the expression of MMP‐13 while concurrently suppressing the expressions of both MMP‐1 and MMP‐3 [32]. Studies have demonstrated that while MMP‐1 and MMP‐8 primarily degrade type I and III collagens, respectively, MMP‐13 exhibits a predominant affinity for type II collagen, displaying an enhanced degradation efficiency 5–10 times greater than that of MMP‐1 [33]. Collectively, these findings suggest that MMP‐1 may serve as the primary enzyme responsible for collagen damage in human skin during photoaging processes associated with UV exposure.
5.2. The Gelatinases
Two members, MMP‐2 and MMP‐9, which belong to the gelatinase group, have been implicated in human skin aging. Studies have demonstrated that exposure to pollutants increases the expression level of MMP‐2 in both young and aged animals; however, only UV‐treated aged animals showed detectable levels of MMP‐9 [34]. The transcriptional regulation of most MMPs involves a complex interplay of stimulatory and suppressive factors that modulate multiple signaling pathways. Emerging evidence suggests that MMP‐2 may exhibit constitutive expression at the protein level [35]. Additionally, co‐expression of MMP‐2 and MMP‐9 in conjunction with MMP‐3 can induce the degradation of non‐collagenous constituents within the skin, including glycoproteins and proteoglycans present in the basement membrane [36, 37]. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that MMP‐9 exhibits the ability to enzymatically cleave collagen types I and III [38]. Although there is established evidence supporting MMP‐2's ability to cleave type I collagen, the extent of its collagenolytic activity remains a subject of controversy [39].
5.3. The Stromelysins
The members of the stromelysin family include MMP‐3, also known as stromelysin‐1, and MMP‐10, alternatively referred to as stromelysin‐2. MMP‐3 is expressed by various cell types including keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and chondrocytes both in culture and in vivo. It is primarily secreted by fibroblasts and epithelial cells along with MMP‐10 [40, 41]. Although MMP‐3 lacks the ability to cleave native type I collagen, it demonstrates a propensity for degrading other ECM proteins such as E‐cadherin, laminins, and type IV collagen. Additionally, MMP‐3 can activate collagenases and gelatinases including MMP‐1, MMP‐8, MMP‐13, and MMP‐9 [42], thereby playing a crucial role in the generation of fully active MMPs.
The pleiotropic cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α plays a pivotal role as an inflammatory mediator in cutaneous tissues. In fibroblasts, TNF‐α is implicated in the degradation of dermal collagen induced by photoaging [43]. Accumulating evidence suggests that TNF‐α facilitates collagen degradation by means of MMP‐1 and MMP‐3, with the potential involvement of MMP‐3 in activating MMP‐1 [44]. Notably, MMP‐3 also cleaves the precursor of TNF‐α to generate active TNF‐α, which subsequently induces the expression of MMP‐9 [45]. The induction of apoptosis by TNF‐a is significantly attenuated in mice with MMP‐3 deficiency specifically in their skin [46, 47], leading to a dramatic decrease in collagen degradation [48]. These findings suggest that while MMP‐3 does not directly degrade type I collagen, it can indirectly modulate its degradation by influencing the activity of other MMPs. Limited investigations have been conducted on the association between MMP‐10 and skin aging; however, previous research has linked it to processes such as wound healing and cell migration [49].
5.4. The Matrilysins
MMP‐7 and MMP‐26 are members of the matrylisin family of proteinases. The biological functions of MMP‐7 primarily involve ECM remodeling and regulation of the immune system. Active MMP‐7 cleaves ECM and basement membrane proteins, thereby activating collagenases [50]. Moreover, MMP‐7 exhibits the ability to cleave ECM substrates and augment the activities of pro‐MMP‐2 and pro‐MMP‐9. Furthermore, upon exposure to UV radiation, MMP‐7 can effectively degrade elastin [34]. In contrast, MMP‐26, also referred to as matrilysin‐2, exhibits hydrolytic activity toward collagen type IV, fibronectin, fibrinogen, and gelatin while displaying no degradation of laminin or elastin [51]. However, it is capable of activating MMP‐9 [52].
5.5. The Furin‐Containing MMPs
MMP‐11, MMP‐21, and MMP‐28 belong to the furin‐containing MMP group. Specifically, MMP‐11 is referred to as stromelysin‐3 and is primarily secreted by fibroblasts under both normal and pathological conditions. Interestingly, unlike other members of the MMP family, MMP‐11 exhibits an unconventional anti‐apoptotic function. Conversely, downregulation of MMP‐28 has been observed in epidermal wounds, suggesting its potential involvement in epidermal maturation [53]. To date, no reports have been published regarding the correlation between skin aging and MMP‐21.
5.6. The Membrane‐Type MMPs
The membrane‐type MMPs comprise a group of enzymes, namely MMP‐14, MMP‐15, MMP‐16, MMP‐24, MMP‐17, MMP‐25, and MMP‐23. Specifically, the enzymatic activity of MMP‐14 involves the cleavage of collagen types I, II, and III as well as fibronectin, vitronectin, and laminins 111 and 332. Additionally, it also cleaves fibrin molecules along with proteoglycans [54]. However, the precise identification of the key enzyme involved in skin aging remains elusive within any biological context. Remarkably, mice with MMP‐14 deletion have exhibited a severe phenotype characterized by progressive fibrosis of soft tissues [55, 56]. The mice also exhibited premature mortality, while the surviving adult mice demonstrated increased dermal thickness and tissue rigidity [55]. Importantly, this effect was confined to the skin without exerting any impact on other organs such as the kidney, liver, and lungs [57], suggesting that MMP‐14 may play a crucial role in the maintenance of collagen I in the skin. However, additional MMP‐14‐deficient mice exhibited cardiovascular anomalies and concomitant robust accumulation of type I collagen in cardiac tissues. Furthermore, researchers observed heightened senescence‐associated beta‐galactosidase (SA‐β‐Gal) activity in fibroblasts from these MMP‐14‐deficient mice, along with elevated levels of aging markers such as Hp1γ, p16INK4α, and p21CIP1/WAF1 in various tissues, indicating the presence of a senescence process. Notably, the absence of MMP‐14 also resulted in significant inflammatory response and aberrations in nuclear envelope structure within fibroblasts lacking this protein [58]. Moreover, MMP‐14 was observed to induce the activation of both MMP‐2 and MMP‐13, leading to their collaborative degradation of the ECM [59].
Currently, the specific enzyme responsible for skin aging and its associated cascade of interactions within any biological context remains unidentified. However, compelling evidence suggests that mice lacking MMP‐14 exhibit a pronounced phenotype characterized by progressive fibrosis of soft tissues in the skin [55, 56]. Mice deficient in MMP‐14 exhibit premature mortality, while adult survivors demonstrate augmented dermal thickness and tissue rigidity [55]. The observed effect is specifically confined to the skin and does not exhibit in other organs such as the kidney, liver, and lungs [57], indicating a crucial role for MMP‐14 in maintaining collagen I levels specifically within the skin. Conversely, MMP‐14‐deficient mice exhibit cardiovascular defects and significant accumulation of type I collagen in their hearts. Moreover, fibroblasts from these mice display higher SA‐β‐Gal activity and elevated expression of aging markers including Hp1γ, p16INK4α, and p21CIP1/WAF1 across various tissues—indicating an ongoing senescence process. Additionally, MMP‐14 deficiency leads to pronounced inflammatory response alongside nuclear envelope aberrations observed in fibroblasts [58]. Furthermore, MMP‐14 has been demonstrated to induce the activation of both MMP‐2 and MMP‐13, leading to their collaborative degradation of the ECM [59].
To date, there is a lack of evidence demonstrating the UV‐dependent modulation of another membrane‐type MMP‐MMP‐15 in human fibroblasts. We investigated the expression levels of MMP‐1, MMP‐2, MMP‐3, MMP‐9, MMP‐13, and MMP‐15 in human skin fibroblasts after exposure to UVA irradiation. Our observations revealed a significant upregulation of expressions for MMP‐2, MMP‐3, and MMP‐15 upon irradiation when compared with untreated control samples. Nevertheless, the degree of upregulation observed for MMP‐l was less prominent than that seen for these three specific MMPs in our study. In contrast, UVA irradiation did not exert a substantial influence on the levels of investigated MMPs, namely, MMP‐g and MMP‐i3, which may be due to their comparatively lower baseline expression levels in fibroblasts [60].
5.7. The Other MMPs
The other group of MMPs includes MMP‐12, MMP‐19, MMP‐20, MMP‐22, and MMP‐27. In addition to collagen degradation in the skin, alterations in elastin levels also play a pivotal role in the process of photoaging. Despite constituting only 2%–4% of the total protein content of the skin, elastin serves as the primary component responsible for rebounding and restoring functionality. Evidence indicates that macrophage MMP‐12 is the most crucial MMP involved in elastin degradation. Given that photoaging involves both fiber destruction and repair along with new fiber synthesis, mid‐product tropoelastin is more susceptible to degradation by MMP‐12 compared to insoluble elastin. Consequently, not only does MMP‐12 contribute to elastic fiber destruction but it also disrupts the repair process by degrading expressed tropoelastin. Macrophages and fibroblasts secrete MMP‐12 during acute UV‐induced skin injury [26, 61]; meanwhile, detectable levels of this enzyme have been observed in regions displaying significant elastic damage [62]. In addition to its direct involvement in elastin degradation, MMP‐12 also functions as an activator of other pro‐MMPs including pro‐MMP‐1, MMP‐2, MMP‐3, and MMP‐9 [33, 63].
6. MMP Inhibitors as a Promising Therapy for Skin Aging
MMPs play a pivotal role in the degradation of ECM, thereby exerting influence on both physiological and pathological processes associated with skin aging. Consequently, the development of MMP inhibitors holds immense potential for mitigating skin aging. Therefore, it is imperative to design MMP inhibitors that specifically target mechanisms related to skin aging. The initial generation of MMP inhibitors, such as Ilomastat (GM6001), Marimastat, and CGS‐27023A, exhibited limited specificity toward MMPs. Most of these first‐generation inhibitors were hydroxamic acid‐based compounds that demonstrated poor oral bioavailability and released toxic hydroxylamine during human metabolic reactions [64]. In contrast, a plethora of plants and plant extracts exhibit diverse biological activities with fewer associated side effects compared to synthetic preparations [65]. Researchers are actively investigating safer and more natural alternatives to inhibit MMPs in order to counteract skin aging caused by environmental stressors such as ultraviolet radiation or oxidative stress. Here, we present a compilation of natural substances renowned for their ability to suppress both the expression and activity of MMPs.
6.1. The Plant Extract, Animal Oil, and Probiotics that Inhibit MMPs
Certain bioactive compounds derived from botanical, zoological sources, and probiotics demonstrate inhibitory effects on MMP expression, attenuate levels of ROS, and stimulate collagen synthesis, thereby retarding the process of cutaneous aging.
a. Leontopodium alpinum, a perennial herb belonging to the family Asteraceae, thrives in harsh weather conditions and is renowned for its bacteriostatic [66], antioxidant [67], blood‐lipid‐regulating [68], anti‐inflammatory [69], and analgesic [70] properties, making it a valuable source of raw material with diverse pharmacological effects. Recent research has demonstrated that the extract derived from L. alpinum callus culture effectively mitigates blue‐light‐induced damage in human foreskin fibroblast cells by inhibiting the OPN3‐calcium pathway. Moreover, application of this extract promotes COL1 secretion while reducing levels of ROS and MMP‐1 [71].
b. The ginseng (Panax ginseng Meyer) is a medicinal and natural tonic plant belonging to the Araliaceae family. Ginsenosides are considered the primary bioactive constituents of ginseng. While previous studies have primarily focused on the therapeutic effects of ginseng root, recent research has revealed that ginseng leaves contain a higher concentration of ginsenosides, particularly Rg3 and Rk1. These specific compounds have demonstrated their ability to protect human keratinocytes from UVB‐induced damage. Importantly, oral administration of ginseng leaves has been shown to effectively mitigate photoaging in hairless mice by reducing levels of MMP‐2, MMP‐9, IL‐6, and cyclooxygenase‐2 in the skin, thereby diminishing wrinkle formation [72].
c. Caragana sinica, a deciduous shrub, has been previously investigated for its potential therapeutic applications in neuralgia, arthritis, and hypertension. It is recognized as a phytoestrogen possessing antibacterial, anti‐inflammatory, neuroprotective, and antioxidant properties [73, 74]. The flower extract of C. sinica exerts a positive influence on human keratinocytes (HaCaT cells) by promoting their proliferation and migration through the enhancement of phosphorylation in three conventional MAPK family members (ERK1/2, p38 MAPK, and JNK). These members have been reported to play crucial roles in HaCaT cell proliferation and migration [75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81]. Moreover, the flower extract also activates the AKT signaling pathway, which is implicated in keratinocyte migration and proliferation [77, 78, 82]. Additionally, it enhances the synthesis of collagen types I and IV while inhibiting the activities of MMP‐2 and MMP‐9. Moreover, there is an upregulation in levels of hyaluronic acid (HA) accompanied by elevated HA synthase‐2 expression [83].
d. The species Chamaecyparis obtusa (C. obtuse) is extensively cultivated for its high‐quality timber, while the oil derived from C. obtuse has been documented to possess antibacterial, anti‐inflammatory, and antioxidant properties [84, 85, 86]. Moreover, an ethanol extract derived from C. obtusa exhibited remarkable antioxidant activity and effectively attenuated UVA‐induced fibroblast apoptosis by suppressing the expression levels of MMP‐1, MMP‐3, TNF‐α, and IL‐6 genes. Furthermore, it upregulated mRNA levels of collagen type I and superoxide dismutase [87].
e. The cultivation of Phaseolus angularis L. is widely practiced due to the seeds' abundant protein and starch content, as well as their potential in mitigating edema, ameliorating inflammation, and counteracting poisoning [88]. Furthermore, it has been discovered that the extract derived from P. angularis L. seeds effectively inhibits the expression of MMP‐1 and MMP‐3, thereby preventing photoaging. This mechanism involves reducing the phosphorylation of p38 and JNK, as well as impeding the nuclear translocation of phosphorylated c‐Fos and c‐Jun upon UVB exposure. Additionally, treatment with P. angularis L. seed extract demonstrates reparative properties against UVB‐induced damage while stimulating procollagen type I production [89].
f. The Cosmos caudatus Kunth belongs to the Asteracecae family and is cultivated in Malaysia. Its leaves and stems are frequently consumed raw as a salad called Ulam Raja or “King's Salad.” In Malaysia, it has become popular due to local beliefs associating regular consumption of C. caudatus Kunth with maintaining youthful skin. Extensive research has been conducted on this plant regarding its antioxidant, antidiabetic, anti‐inflammatory, antihypertensive, anti‐obesity, anti‐osteoporotic, and antimicrobial properties [90, 91]. The recent research has demonstrated that extracts derived from C. caudatus Kunth exhibit the potential to enhance collagen production by effectively inhibiting collagenase activity. Moreover, it effectively suppresses the expression of MMP‐1 and MMP‐3 while also demonstrating inhibitory effects on NF‐κB activation in CCD‐966SK cells, thereby highlighting its promising role as a potent anti‐aging agent [92].
g. Goji berry (Lycium barbarum), a dried fruit of the tree belonging to the Solanaceae family, exhibits anticancer properties [93], enhances immunity [94], improves liver function [95], and inhibits glycation [96]. The fig (Ficus carica L.), a member of the Moraceae family, is renowned for its antibacterial, antioxidant, anticancer, antipyretic, emollient, and cholesterol‐lowering properties [97]. Agastache rugosa Kuntze, a perennial plant belonging to the Labiate family and commonly known as Kwakhyang, Bang‐a or Korean mint, has been found to possess extracts that play a pivotal role in the anti‐photoaging and antioxidative processes of UVB‐irradiated human skin cells and hairless mice [98, 99]. The product known as AGEs Blocker (AB) comprises a blend of goji berry extract, fig extract, and Korean mint extract. Research indicates that AB exerts anti‐aging effects by inhibiting glycation. In hairless mice models treated with AB, there was an observed augmentation in antioxidative enzyme activity accompanied by reduced levels of inflammatory cytokines; downregulation of MMP‐9 expression; elevation in collagen and hyaluronic acid levels resulting in diminished skin wrinkles, improved elasticity, and enhanced hydration [100]. Oral administration of AB in UVB‐irradiated hairless mice effectively attenuated UVB‐induced erythema while simultaneously restoring skin elasticity and reducing wrinkles caused by UVB exposure through upregulation of genes involved in hyaluronic acid synthesis as well as collagen synthesis. Furthermore, AB exhibited inhibitory effects on MMP‐1 and MMP‐9 expressions by suppressing MAPK/AP‐1(c‐fos) activation induced by UVB irradiation [101].
h. Krill oil (KO), derived from Euphausia superba, contains unique phospholipids absent in fish oil and constitutes 30%–65% of KO's composition [102]. In addition to its application in human health improvement, krill oil has exhibited potential as a natural marine‐derived ingredient for enhancing skin health. Experimental evidence suggests that krill oil effectively attenuates UVB‐induced skin photoaging by suppressing MMP‐1 production, promoting hyaluronan and collagen synthesis, and inhibiting elastase activity [103].
i. Probiotics, as live microorganisms, have the potential to enhance gut health in humans upon ingestion. Numerous studies have demonstrated their ability to exert systemic effects by modulating the gut environment [104, 105]. Oral administration of Latilactobacillus sakei wikim0066 in UVB‐exposed HR‐1 mice led to a reduction in wrinkle formation and epidermal thickness while concurrently promoting procollagen type I synthesis through the regulation of MMP‐1 and MMP‐3, the MAPK signaling pathway, AP‐1 transcription factor, and NF‐κB [106].
j. Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 7469 is a probiotic strain that confers numerous benefits for enhancing human health. In studies conducted on mouse skin fibroblast cells, it was observed that this strain exerted protective effects against UVB‐induced DNA damage by downregulating the expressions of MMP‐1, MMP‐2, and MMP‐3 while upregulating the expression of COL1A1. Furthermore, in human epidermal melanocytes, L. rhamnosus ATCC 7469 was found to attenuate ROS levels through the Nrf2/Sirt3/SOD2 signaling pathway and inhibit tyrosinase activity via the PKA/CREB/MITF signaling pathway, thereby exhibiting an inhibitory effect on melanin production [107].
In addition to complex natural extracts from plants and animals, there are certain single‐ingredient natural compounds derived from plants that demonstrate inhibitory effects on MMPs.
k. The Aconitum carmichaelii, an indigenous plant of East Asia and East Russia, exhibits medicinal properties in terms of fever reduction, asthma alleviation, and sedation [108, 109]. Higenamine, derived from the roots of Aconitum, has been employed in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders [110]. Recent investigations have indicated that higenamine, a natural plant alkaloid, may exhibit protective effects against skin aging induced by fine particulate matter in human keratinocytes (HaCaT cells). This compound effectively reduces the production of ROS and mitigates MMP‐1 expression resulting from exposure to fine particulate matter. Moreover, higenamine can interfere with AP1 and NF‐κB activities—two factors closely associated with MMP‐1 transcription [111].
l. The application of hyaluronan as a cosmetic ingredient is extensive, and a novel hyaluronan complex has been developed by combining 30 kDa sodium hyaluronate with its acetylated derivatives. This hyaluronan complex effectively suppressed the expression of MMP‐1 while simultaneously enhancing the expression of type I collagen and dermal–epidermal junction proteins in human dermal fibroblasts [112].
m. The herbaceous plant Salvia plebeia R. Br (SP) is abundant in flavonoids and possesses potent anti‐inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Its primary bioactive constituent, homoplantaginin (HP), has been found to exert a protective effect against UVB‐induced damage by attenuating the generation of ROS and malondialdehyde (MDA). Additionally, SP and HP suppress SA‐β‐Gal activity, inhibit the MAPK signaling pathway to reduce MMP‐1 and IL‐6 secretion, as well as activate the TGF‐β/Smad pathway to enhance type I procollagen synthesis [113].
n. The photosensitizer chlorine 6 can be activated by a specific wavelength of light, making it a commonly employed agent in photodynamic therapy (PDT) for targeted cell destruction during tumor treatment [114]. Curcumin, a polyphenolic compound derived from the rhizome of Curcuma longa (turmeric), has been extensively investigated for its potential role in UVA and UVB‐induced photoaging [115, 116]. The coadministration of curcumin and chlorine 6 has been documented to augment the efficacy of chlorine 6 photodynamic therapy (PDT) [117]. Recently, three novel derivatives of chlorine 6‐curcumin (Ce6‐propane‐curcumin, Ce6‐hexane‐curcumin, and Ce6‐diPEG‐curcumin) have demonstrated their potential in mitigating photoaging in human skin fibroblasts (Hs68) and mouse embryonic fibroblasts (BALB/c 3T3) cells by modulating the levels of MMP‐1 and MMP‐2. Moreover, these compounds exhibit anti‐inflammatory properties and facilitate collagen synthesis [118].
o. Cycloastragenol (CAG), a triterpene aglycone derived from astragaloside IV extracted from Astragalus membranaceus root, exhibits diverse pharmacological effects including enhancement of telomerase activity [119] and involvement in age‐related diseases [120]. The evidence demonstrates that CAG effectively suppresses the expression of MMP‐1, MMP‐9, MMP‐13, and ROS induced by UVB and H2O2 while simultaneously restoring collagen type I levels. Furthermore, CAG significantly enhances the production of hyaluronic acid as well as crucial hydration factors such as filaggrin and serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT) [121].
p. Hesperidin, a flavanone glycoside, and its aglycone hesperetin are primarily present in bitter oranges (Citrus aurantium), peppermint, and select other plants. These compounds have been reported as effective agents in the process of anti‐photoaging [122, 123]. Rhamnose, a monosaccharide found in rutinose, exerts a beneficial role in the process of skin regeneration [124]. When applied to human dermal fibroblasts in combination, hesperidin, hesperetin, rutinose, and rhamnose were observed to attenuate cellular senescence. Hesperidin and hesperetin exhibited inhibitory effects on elastase and hyaluronidase activity, while all four substances tested reduced MMP‐1 and MMP‐2 levels. Moreover, the application of rhamnose and rutinose promoted collagen type I synthesis [125].
6.2. The Proteins, Polypeptides, and Amino Acids that Inhibit MMPs
The anti‐aging properties of collagen, whether applied topically or consumed orally, are widely recognized. Furthermore, recent research has revealed the potential of specific proteins, peptides, and amino acids in inhibiting MMP activation and prolonging skin's youthful appearance.
a. The leucine‐rich alpha‐2‐glycoprotein 1 (LRG1) is a member of the leucine‐rich repeat protein family and functions as a secreted glycoprotein. Within the dermal tissue, LRG1 exhibits expression in fibroblasts, keratinocytes, and endothelial cells [126]. Purified recombinant human Leucine‐rich alpha‐2‐glycoprotein 1 (LRG1) has been shown to augment the secretion of collagen type I and suppress the secretion of matrix metalloproteinase‐1 by activating the transforming growth factor‐beta (TGF‐β) signaling pathway. Additionally, a decline in LRG1 mRNA and protein expression has been observed in aged human skin fibroblasts [127]. The SPARC protein is capable of inducing activation of the TGF‐β signaling pathway in human fibroblasts, resulting in enhanced synthesis of collagen type I and reduced secretion of MMP‐1 [128].
b. The photosynthetic protein C‐phycocyanin (C‐PC), derived from Spirulina, demonstrates anti‐photoaging properties. Application of topical C‐PC on UVB‐exposed mouse skin resulted in a reduction in sagging and coarse wrinkling, prevention of dermal collagen fiber loosening, enhancement of antioxidant enzyme activity, decrease in expression levels of inflammatory factors, as well as downregulation of MMP‐3 and MMP‐9 [129].
c. The collagen peptide Gly‐Pro‐Val‐Gly‐Pro‐Ser derived from Oreochromis niloticus fish exhibited protective effects on photoaging mimic models by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activities and reducing pro‐inflammatory factors both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, this peptide upregulated transforming growth factor‐β receptor I, collagen type I, and procollagen type I while downregulating c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase expression. Additionally, it increased hyaluronic acid levels and decreased the protein expressions of ceramide synthase 4 as well as MMP‐1, ‐2, and ‐9. Consequently, it demonstrated efficacy against UVB‐induced skin photoaging [130].
d. γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA), a non‐protein amino acid endogenously synthesized in the human body [131], plays a crucial role in various skin‐related processes [132, 133]. Substantiated evidence demonstrates the effective inhibition of UVB‐induced MMP‐1 expression by GABA. Moreover, compelling in vivo experiments have demonstrated that supplementation with GABA restores the adverse effects of UVB exposure, including increased skin wrinkles, reduced epidermal thickness, and compromised skin moisture and elasticity [134].
6.3. MMP Inhibitors in the Clinical Application
a. The composition of caviar oil includes Candida Bombicola/Glucose/Methyl Rapeseedate ferment, Macadamia ternifolia seed oil, and caviar extract. It is abundant in docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), amino acids, vitamins, and minerals [135]. The application of caviar oil demonstrates potential anti‐aging effects through the downregulation of MMP‐1, MMP‐2, and MMP‐9 expression levels while simultaneously promoting elastin and collagen I, III synthesis in human skin tissues. In a clinical study involving a formulation containing 15% caviar oil, significant improvements were observed across various skin parameters including reduction in forehead wrinkles, glabellar lines, nasolabial folds, marionette lines as well as enhancement in water retention capacity, skin hydration levels, elasticity enhancement, clarity improvement, increased dermal density, and overall skin tightening relief [135].
b. Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a renowned and iconic cosmetic ingredient recognized for its anti‐aging properties through the promotion of skin hydration. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the skin penetration ability of HA is contingent upon its molecular weight [136]. In comparison to high molecular weight, intermediate (300 kDa) and low (20–50 kDa) molecular weights of HA demonstrate enhanced dermal penetration [137]. To address the issue of rapid degradation by hyaluronidase in the skin, researchers have developed acetylated HA with enhanced resistance to hyaluronidase degradation and improved deep dermal penetration. Clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of acetylated HA in reducing crow's feet and wrinkles in the nasogenian area. Additionally, acetylated HA exhibits inhibitory effects on MMP‐1, MMP‐3, and MMP‐9 expression while attenuating H2O2‐induced degradation of type I collagen [138].
c. Numerous species of Rosa exist, cultivated as horticultural crops for their edible and medicinal petals. A clinical trial demonstrated the efficacy of a formulation containing Rosa gallica petals in suppressing MMP‐1 expression, thereby exhibiting anti‐wrinkle and skin whitening properties. In vivo experiments further validated the MMP‐1 inhibiting function of the formulation with Rosa gallica petals [139].
d. The rhizomes of Anemarrhena asphodeloides Bunge (Liliaceae) have long been utilized in traditional medicine for their antidiabetic, antipyretic, and antidepressant properties, as well as their efficacy in the treatment of febrile diseases [140, 141]. Timosaponin A‐III (TA‐III), identified as the primary chemical constituent of Anemarrhena asphodeloides Bunge, has been found to effectively reduce wrinkles in a 12‐week clinical trial involving female subjects aged 43–55 years. Additionally, TA‐III demonstrated inhibitory effects on the upregulation of MMP‐1 expression and pro‐inflammatory cytokines in HaCaT cells exposed to UVB irradiation [142].
e. Autologous serum platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) has been employed for skin rejuvenation in individuals exhibiting wrinkles and signs of aging. A clinical trial conducted on a cohort of healthy female subjects demonstrated the efficacy of PRP treatment in reducing wrinkle appearance, enhancing skin texture, and minimizing pore size. In an experimental setting utilizing a human organotypic skin model, PRP treatment followed by UVB irradiation resulted in diminished expression levels of MMP‐1 and tyrosinase. Moreover, exposure to UVB radiation restored the expression of fibrillin and tropoelastin [143].
f. HDF injections: In the context of aging human skin, the secretion of collagen by dermal fibroblasts diminishes; nevertheless, autologous transdermis injection of human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) has gained FDA approval as a strategy to impede skin aging. When compared to monolayer culture of HDFs, three‐dimensional spheroids augment the expression of procollagen type I and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases‐1 (TIMP‐1), thereby suppressing MMP‐1 expression [144]. The clinical application of HDFs appears to present a safer alternative compared to other small molecular MMP inhibitors.
7. Conclusion
Skin aging is a complex process influenced by multiple factors. Extrinsic skin aging can be triggered by environmental elements such as smoking, wind exposure, exposure to harmful chemicals, and an unhealthy diet. Current research predominantly focuses on the role of MMPs in UV‐induced skin damage, with limited attention given to other factors impacting MMPs and skin aging. Recently, investigating the susceptibility of skin to sugar has gained traction as a research endeavor. The formation of AGEs (Advanced Glycation End Products) through protein‐sugar reactions significantly alters the physical, biomechanical, and biological properties of the skin. Accumulation of AGEs in the skin leads to wrinkles, loss of elasticity, dullness, and impaired functionality—one of the primary mechanisms underlying skin aging. Studies have demonstrated that culturing fibroblasts with AGEs upregulates mRNA expression levels of MMP‐8 and MMP‐9 [145]. In a 3D system containing glycated collagen, fibroblasts exhibited reduced quantities but suppressed activity levels of pro‐MMP‐2 [146]. Given the escalating skincare challenges we face, it is imperative to acquire further insights into emerging factors that contribute to disruptions in MMP regulation.
Photoaging is a complex and protracted process involving the continuous degradation, repair, and synthesis of damaged fibers over an extended duration. Therefore, the inhibition of MMPs should be regarded as an ongoing imperative throughout daily life. Table 1 summarizes the natural extracts, protein, and amino acids that could inhibit MMPs as well as the MMP inhibitors in the clinical trials. However, there have been numerous challenges in the clinical application of synthetic small‐molecule inhibitors. As previously mentioned, first‐generation MMP inhibitors exhibit suboptimal safety profiles due to their inadequate pharmacokinetics and lower selectivity. Presently, only periostat (containing doxycycline hydrochloride) has received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an MMP inhibitor for periodontitis treatment [147]. Most MMP inhibitors exhibit noticeable side effects primarily due to inadequate specificity in inhibitor selection [148, 149]. Moreover, MMPs represent promising therapeutic targets in a wide range of pathological conditions including malignancies, osteoarthritis, neurodegenerative disorders, infectious diseases, and cardiovascular ailments [150, 151, 152, 153, 154]. Moreover, MMPs represent promising therapeutic targets in a wide range of pathological conditions including malignancies, osteoarthritis, neurodegenerative disorders, infectious diseases, and cardiovascular ailments [155, 156, 157, 158]. Consequently, the development of selective MMP inhibitors is imperative rather than employing non‐specific ones.
TABLE 1.
The inhibitors of MMPs.
| Compound | Target | Biological activity | System | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1. Natural substance extract | ||||
| Leontopodium alpinum callus culture extract | MMP‐1 |
Blue‐light‐damage↓ COL‐1 production↑ ROS↓ OPN3 secretion↓ |
Human foreskin fibroblast cells | Meng, X. et al. 2023 |
| Ginseng leaves |
MMP‐2 MMP‐9 |
Anti‐photoaging↑ Skin wrinkles↓ IL‐6 and cyclooxygenase‐2↓ |
Human keratinocytes (HaCat) HR‐1 hairless mouse |
Son, E. et al. 2023 |
| Caragana sinica flower extract |
MMP‐2 MMP‐9 |
HaCat cell proliferation and migration↑ Hyaluronic acid↑ Collagen type I and IV syntheses↑ |
HaCaT cells | Kim, M.J. et al. 2023 |
| Chamaecyparis obtusa (C. obtuse) extract |
MMP‐1 MMP‐3 |
Fibroblast death↓ Collagen type I mRNA superoxide dismutase mRNA↑ |
Human dermal fibroblast cells | Jang, Y.‐A. et al. 2023 |
| Phaseolus angularis L. seed extract |
MMP‐1 MMP‐3 |
Anti‐photoaging↑ Antioxidant activities↓ Procollagen type I production↓ |
HaCaT cells | Oh, S. et al. 2023 |
| Cosmos caudatus Kunth extract |
MMP‐1 MMP‐3 |
Anti‐aging↓ Collagenase activity↑ NF‐κB activation↑ |
CCD‐966SK cells | Loo, Y.C. et al. 2023 |
|
AGEs Blocker (Goji berry, Fig, and Korean mint mixed extract) |
MMP‐1 MMP‐9 |
Skin aging↑ Antioxidative enzymes↑ AGEs↓ Collagen and hyaluronic acid↑ Inflammatory cytokines↓ |
Mouse, Hs68 fibroblasts, HaCaT cells |
Yoo, J.H. et al. 2023 Jung, J. et al. 2023 |
| Krill oil | MMP‐1 |
Oxidative stress↓ Wrinkles↓ Collagen and hyaluronic synthesis↑ |
DF, HaCaT, and B16/F10 cells Hairless mouse |
Kim, J. et al. 2023 |
| Latilactobacillus sakei Wikim0066 |
MMP‐1 MMP‐3 |
Wrinkle formation↓ Type I procollagen↑ MAPK, AP‐1, and NF‐κB expression↓ |
Hs68 cells, HR‐1 mice | Park, J.‐Y. et al. 2023 |
| Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 7469 |
MMP‐1 MMP‐2 MMP‐3 |
DNA damage↓ COL1A1 expression↑ ROS content↓ Tyrosinase activity↓ |
Mouse skin fibroblast, human epidermal melanocytes | Zhang, X. et al. 2023 |
| Higenamine | MMP‐1 |
Fine‐dust‐induced skin aging↓ ROS production↓ AP‐1 and NF‐κB activation↓ |
Human HaCaT cells | Kim, D. et al. 2023 |
| Hyaluronan | MMP‐1 |
Collagen type I expression↑ Dermal–epidermal junction protein expression↑ |
Human dermal fibroblasts | Chen, F. et al. 2023 |
| Salvia plebeia R. Br (SP) and homoplantaginin (HP) | MMP‐1 |
ROS, MDA, SA‐β‐Gal, and IL‐6↓ MAPK signaling pathway↓ TGF‐β/Smad pathway↑ Collagen degradation↓ |
HaCaT cells, mouse | Guo, Y. et al. 2023 |
| Chlorin e6‐Curcumin |
MMP‐1 MMP‐2 |
Photoaging↓ Skin inflammation↓ Collagen synthesis↑ |
Human skin fibroblasts (Hs68), mouse embryonic fibroblasts (BALB/c 3T3) cells | Thapa Magar, T.B. et al. 2023 |
| Cycloastragenol |
MMP‐1 MMP‐9 MMP‐13 |
ROS generation↓ Collagen type I↑ Hyaluronic acid↑ |
Human HaCaT cells | Yang, M.H. et al. 2023 |
| Hesperidin, Hesperetin, Rutinose, Rhamnose |
MMP‐1 MMP‐2 |
Elastase, hyaluronidase, and collagenase activity Collagen I production↑ |
Human dermal fibroblasts | Novotná, R. et al. 2023 |
| 2. Protein and amino acids | ||||
| Human leucine‐rich alpha‐2‐glycoprotein 1 | MMP‐1 |
Collagen type I secretion↑ TGF‐β signaling pathway↑ |
Human skin fibroblasts | Park, H.N. et al. 2023 |
| SPARC protein | MMP‐1 |
Collagen type I secretion↑ TGF‐β signaling pathway↑ |
Human fibroblasts | Ham, S.M. et al. 2023 |
| C‐phycocyanin | MMP‐3 MMP‐9 |
Photoaging↓ Collagen fibers loose↑ Antioxidant enzymes activity inflammatory factors↓ |
Mouse skin | Zhou, Y. et al. 2023 |
| Gly‐Pro‐Val‐Gly‐Pro‐Ser fish collagen peptide |
MMP‐1 MMP‐2 MMP‐9 |
Photoaging↓ Antioxidant enzymes activity↑ Hyaluronic acid↑ c‐Fos, c‐Jun↓ Transforming growth factor‐β receptor I↑ Collagen type I↑ |
HaCaT cells, mouse | Cho, W. et al. 2023 |
| γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) | MMP‐1 |
Skin wrinkle↓ Epidermal thickness↓ Skin moisture and elasticity↑ |
In vivo intake by mice | Zhao, H. et al. 2023 |
| 3. MMP inhibitors in the clinical trials | ||||
| Caviar oil |
MMP‐1 MMP‐2 MMP‐9 |
Aging↓ Elastin production↑ Collagen types I and III↑ Wrinkle↓ |
Human skin clinical trial Human 3T3‐L1 cells |
Le, L.T.T. et al. 2023 |
| Acetylated HA |
MMP‐1 MMP‐3 MMP‐9 |
Anti‐wrinkle↑ Type I collagen degradation |
Human skin clinical trial Human skin explants Human dermal fibroblasts |
Meunier, M. et al. 2022 |
| Rosa gallica petals containing formulation | MMP‐1 |
Anti‐wrinkle↑ Skin brightness↑ AP‐1 and MAPKs signaling↑ Pathways ↓ |
Clinical trial in human skin Human skin tissue samples |
Song, Y.‐R. et al. 2020 |
| Timosaponin A‐III | MMP‐1 |
Wrinkle↓ Photoaging↓ Pro‐inflammatory cytokines expression↓ TIMP expression↑ |
Human skin clinical trial HaCat cells |
Im, A.R., et al. 2020 |
| Autologous serum platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) | MMP‐1 |
Wrinkles, texture and pores↓ Tyrosinase↓ Fibrillin expression↑ Tropoelastin expression↑ |
Human skin clinical trial Human organotypic skin model |
Du, R. and Lei, T. 2020 |
| Autologous transdermis injection of human dermal fibroblasts | MMP‐1 |
Procollagen type I↑ TIMP expression↑ |
Human skin clinical trial | Hu, S., et al. 2019 |
Due to the necessity for enhanced security measures, there is a growing inclination toward investigating natural sources of MMP inhibitor substances. The extraction of MMP inhibitors from plants and animals offers the potential to obtain these inhibitors through dietary supplements rather than pharmaceutical interventions, thereby presenting a safer approach to inhibiting MMPs in skin aging and maintaining youthful skin. As previously mentioned, numerous natural substances have demonstrated their ability to inhibit MMPs. Although certain plant extracts have been observed to reduce the expression of MMPs, the specific active ingredients responsible for this effect remain unidentified. It is plausible that by harnessing the known active ingredients found in food, drugs, and cosmetics, it may be possible to enhance the inhibitory effects on MMPs. Additionally, studying isolated individual active ingredients can significantly contribute toward developing targeted MMP inhibitors.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: Chunyue Zhao, Xianglong Chen, Xiuqing Yin, and Yanfei Jiang; Investigation: Chao Feng, Xianglong Chen, and Xiuqing Yin; Writing – Original Draft: Chao Feng and Chunyue Zhao; Writing – Review & Editing: Chao Feng and Chunyue Zhao; Supervision: Yanfei Jiang.
Ethics Statement
It is not applicable because this study is based exclusively on published literature.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
The figure is created with BioGDP.com.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Contributor Information
Yanfei Jiang, Email: jiangjun@mail.fivedoctors.cn.
Chunyue Zhao, Email: zhaochunyue@mail.fivedoctors.cn.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
- 1. Silver F. H., Siperko L. M., and Seehra G. P., “Mechanobiology of Force Transduction in Dermal Tissue,” Skin Research and Technology 9, no. 1 (2003): 3–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Krutmann J., Bouloc A., Sore G., Bernard B. A., and Passeron T., “The Skin Aging Exposome,” Journal of Dermatological Science 85, no. 3 (2017): 152–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kligman A. M., “Early Destructive Effect of Sunlight on Human Skin,” JAMA 210, no. 13 (1969): 2377–2380. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Cui N., Hu M., and Khalil R. A., “Biochemical and Biological Attributes of Matrix Metalloproteinases,” Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science 147 (2017): 1–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Silver F. H., Kato Y. P., Ohno M., and Wasserman A. J., “Analysis of Mammalian Connective Tissue: Relationship Between Hierarchical Structures and Mechanical Properties,” Journal of Long‐Term Effects of Medical Implants 2, no. 2–3 (1992): 165–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Gross J. and Lapiere C. M., “Collagenolytic Activity in Amphibian Tissues: A Tissue Culture Assay,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 48, no. 6 (1962): 1014–1022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Amălinei C., Căruntu I. D., Giuşcă S. E., and Bălan R. A., “Matrix Metalloproteinases Involvement in Pathologic Conditions,” Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology 51, no. 2 (2010): 215–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kähäri V. M. and Saarialho‐Kere U., “Matrix Metalloproteinases in Skin,” Experimental Dermatology 6, no. 5 (1997): 199–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wang X. and Khalil R. A., “Matrix Metalloproteinases, Vascular Remodeling, and Vascular Disease,” Advances in Pharmacology 81 (2018): 241–330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Nakagami Y., Abe K., Nishiyama N., and Matsuki N., “Laminin Degradation by Plasmin Regulates Long‐Term Potentiation,” Journal of Neuroscience 20, no. 5 (2000): 2003–2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Uemura A., Nakamura M., Kachi S., et al., “Effect of Plasmin on Laminin and Fibronectin During Plasmin‐Assisted Vitrectomy,” Archives of Ophthalmology 123, no. 2 (2005): 209–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Deryugina E. I. and Quigley J. P., “Cell Surface Remodeling by Plasmin: A New Function for an Old Enzyme,” Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 2012 (2012): 1–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Tu C., Ortega‐Cava C. F., Chen G., et al., “Lysosomal Cathepsin B Participates in the Podosome‐Mediated Extracellular Matrix Degradation and Invasion via Secreted Lysosomes in v‐Src Fibroblasts,” Cancer Research 68, no. 22 (2008): 9147–9156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Jevnikar Z., Mirković B., Fonović U. P., Zidar N., Švajger U., and Kos J., “Three‐Dimensional Invasion of Macrophages Is Mediated by Cysteine Cathepsins in Protrusive Podosomes,” European Journal of Immunology 42, no. 12 (2012): 3429–3441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Steinbrenner H., Ramos M. C., Stuhlmann D., Sies H., and Brenneisen P., “UVA‐Mediated Downregulation of MMP‐2 and MMP‐9 in Human Epidermal Keratinocytes,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 308, no. 3 (2003): 486–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Vicentini F. T., He T., Shao Y., et al., “Quercetin Inhibits UV Irradiation‐Induced Inflammatory Cytokine Production in Primary Human Keratinocytes by Suppressing NF‐κB Pathway,” Journal of Dermatological Science 61, no. 3 (2011): 162–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Petersen M. J., Hansen C., and Craig S., “Ultraviolet A Irradiation Stimulates Collagenase Production in Cultured Human Fibroblasts,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 99, no. 4 (1992): 440–444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Brenneisen P., Oh J., Wlaschek M., et al., “Ultraviolet B Wavelength Dependence for the Regulation of Two Major Matrix‐Metalloproteinases and Their Inhibitor TIMP‐1 in Human Dermal Fibroblasts,” Photochemistry and Photobiology 64, no. 4 (1996): 649–657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kim J., Lee C. W., Kim E. K., et al., “Inhibition Effect of Gynura Procumbens Extract on UV‐B‐Induced Matrix‐Metalloproteinase Expression in Human Dermal Fibroblasts,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 137, no. 1 (2011): 427–433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Chiang H.‐M., Chen H. C., Chiu H. H., Chen C. W., Wang S. M., and Wen K. C., “ Neonauclea reticulata (Havil.) Merr Stimulates Skin Regeneration After UVB Exposure via ROS Scavenging and Modulation of the MAPK/MMPs/Collagen Pathway,” Evidence‐Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2013 (2013): 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Park J. E., Pyun H. B., Woo S. W., Jeong J. H., and Hwang J. K., “The Protective Effect of K Aempferia Parviflora Extract on UVB‐Induced Skin Photoaging in Hairless Mice,” Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine 30, no. 5 (2014): 237–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Imokawa G. and Ishida K., “Biological Mechanisms Underlying the Ultraviolet Radiation‐Induced Formation of Skin Wrinkling and Sagging I: Reduced Skin Elasticity, Highly Associated With Enhanced Dermal Elastase Activity, Triggers Wrinkling and Sagging,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16, no. 4 (2015): 7753–7775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Nakajima H., Ezaki Y., Nagai T., Yoshioka R., and Imokawa G., “Epithelial–Mesenchymal Interaction During UVB‐Induced Up‐Regulation of Neutral Endopeptidase,” Biochemical Journal 443, no. 1 (2012): 297–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Tewari A., Grys K., Kollet J., Sarkany R., and Young A. R., “Upregulation of MMP12 and Its Activity by UVA1 in Human Skin: Potential Implications for Photoaging,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 134, no. 10 (2014): 2598–2609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Park C.‐H., Lee M. J., Ahn J., et al., “Heat Shock‐Induced Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP)‐1 and MMP‐3 Are Mediated Through ERK and JNK Activation and via an Autocrine Interleukin‐6 Loop,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 123, no. 6 (2004): 1012–1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Chen Z., Seo J. Y., Kim Y. K., et al., “Heat Modulation of Tropoelastin, Fibrillin‐1, and Matrix Metalloproteinase‐12 in Human Skin In Vivo,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 124, no. 1 (2005): 70–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Pittayapruek P., Meephansan J., Prapapan O., Komine M., and Ohtsuki M., “Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Photoaging and Photocarcinogenesis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17, no. 6 (2016): 868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Nagase H., Visse R., and Murphy G., “Structure and Function of Matrix Metalloproteinases and TIMPs,” Cardiovascular Research 69, no. 3 (2006): 562–573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Sternlicht M. D. and Werb Z., “How Matrix Metalloproteinases Regulate Cell Behavior,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 17, no. 1 (2001): 463–516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Imokawa G., Nakajima H., and Ishida K., “Biological Mechanisms Underlying the Ultraviolet Radiation‐Induced Formation of Skin Wrinkling and Sagging II: Over‐Expression of Neprilysin Plays an Essential Role,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16, no. 4 (2015): 7776–7795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Brennan M., Bhatti H., Nerusu K. C., et al., “Matrix Metalloproteinase‐1 Is the Major Collagenolytic Enzyme Responsible for Collagen Damage in UV‐Irradiated Human Skin,” Photochemistry and Photobiology 78, no. 1 (2003): 43–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Uría J. A., Jiménez M. G., Balbín M., Freije J. M. P., and López‐Otín C., “Differential Effects of Transforming Growth Factor‐β on the Expression of Collagenase‐1 and Collagenase‐3 in Human Fibroblasts,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 273, no. 16 (1998): 9769–9777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Sbardella D., Fasciglione G. F., Gioia M., et al., “Human Matrix Metalloproteinases: An Ubiquitarian Class of Enzymes Involved in Several Pathological Processes,” Molecular Aspects of Medicine 33, no. 2 (2012): 119–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Fortino V., Maioli E., Torricelli C., Davis P., and Valacchi G., “Cutaneous MMPs Are Differently Modulated by Environmental Stressors in Old and Young Mice,” Toxicology Letters 173, no. 2 (2007): 73–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Strongin A. Y., Collier I., Bannikov G., Marmer B. L., Grant G. A., and Goldberg G. I., “Mechanism of Cell Surface Activation of 72‐kDa Type IV Collagenase: Isolation of the Activated Form of the Membrane Metalloprotease,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 270, no. 10 (1995): 5331–5338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Wong V. W., Garg R. K., Sorkin M., et al., “Loss of Keratinocyte Focal Adhesion Kinase Stimulates Dermal Proteolysis Through Upregulation of MMP9 in Wound Healing,” Annals of Surgery 260, no. 6 (2014): 1138–1146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Xue S.‐n., Lei J., Lin D. Z., Yang C., and Yan L., “Changes in Biological Behaviors of Rat Dermal Fibroblasts Induced by High Expression of MMP9,” World Journal of Emergency Medicine 5, no. 2 (2014): 139–143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Bigg H. F., Rowan A. D., Barker M. D., and Cawston T. E., “Activity of Matrix Metalloproteinase‐9 Against Native Collagen Types I and III,” FEBS Journal 274, no. 5 (2007): 1246–1255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Collier I. E., Legant W., Marmer B., et al., “Diffusion of MMPs on the Surface of Collagen Fibrils: The Mobile Cell Surface–Collagen Substratum Interface,” PLoS One 6, no. 9 (2011): e24029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Sternlicht M. D., Lochter A., Sympson C. J., et al., “The Stromal Proteinase MMP3/Stromelysin‐1 Promotes Mammary Carcinogenesis,” Cell 98, no. 2 (1999): 137–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Visse R. and Nagase H., “Matrix Metalloproteinases and Tissue Inhibitors of Metalloproteinases: Structure, Function, and Biochemistry,” Circulation Research 92, no. 8 (2003): 827–839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Piperi C. and Papavassiliou A. G., “Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Matrix Metalloproteinases,” Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry 12, no. 10 (2012): 1095–1112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Bashir M., Sharma M., and Werth V., “TNF‐α Production in the Skin,” Archives of Dermatological Research 301 (2009): 87–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Ågren M. S., Schnabel R., Christensen L. H., and Mirastschijski U., “Tumor Necrosis Factor‐α‐Accelerated Degradation of Type I Collagen in Human Skin Is Associated With Elevated Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP)‐1 and MMP‐3 Ex Vivo,” European Journal of Cell Biology 94, no. 1 (2015): 12–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Steenport M., Khan K. M. F., du B., Barnhard S. E., Dannenberg A. J., and Falcone D. J., “Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP)‐1 and MMP‐3 Induce Macrophage MMP‐9: Evidence for the Role of TNF‐α and Cyclooxygenase‐2,” Journal of Immunology 183, no. 12 (2009): 8119–8127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Wielockx B., Lannoy K., Shapiro S. D., et al., “Inhibition of Matrix Metalloproteinases Blocks Lethal Hepatitis and Apoptosis Induced by Tumor Necrosis Factor and Allows Safe Antitumor Therapy,” Nature Medicine 7, no. 11 (2001): 1202–1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Witty J. P., Wright J. H., and Matrisian L. M., “Matrix Metalloproteinases Are Expressed During Ductal and Alveolar Mammary Morphogenesis, and Misregulation of Stromelysin‐1 in Transgenic Mice Induces Unscheduled Alveolar Development,” Molecular Biology of the Cell 6, no. 10 (1995): 1287–1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Mirastschijski U., Lupše B., Maedler K., et al., “Matrix Metalloproteinase‐3 Is Key Effector of TNF‐α‐Induced Collagen Degradation in Skin,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 20 (2019): 5234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Madlener M. and Werner S., “cDNA Cloning and Expression of the Gene Encoding Murine Stromelysin‐2 (MMP‐10),” Gene 202, no. 1–2 (1997): 75–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Quantin B., Murphy G., and Breathnach R., “Pump‐1 cDNA Codes for a Protein With Characteristics Similar to Those of Classical Collagenase Family Members,” Biochemistry 28, no. 13 (1989): 5327–5334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Park H. I., Ni J., Gerkema F. E., Liu D., Belozerov V. E., and Sang Q. X. A., “Identification and Characterization of Human Endometase (Matrix Metalloproteinase‐26) From Endometrial Tumor,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 275, no. 27 (2000): 20540–20544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Uría J. A. and López‐Otín C., “Matrilysin‐2, a New Matrix Metalloproteinase Expressed in Human Tumors and Showing the Minimal Domain Organization Required for Secretion, Latency, and Activity,” Cancer Research 60, no. 17 (2000): 4745–4751. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Ågren M. S., Litman T., Eriksen J. O., Schjerling P., Bzorek M., and Gjerdrum L. M. R., “Gene Expression Linked to Reepithelialization of Human Skin Wounds,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 24 (2022): 15746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Seiki M., “Membrane‐Type 1 Matrix Metalloproteinase: A Key Enzyme for Tumor Invasion,” Cancer Letters 194, no. 1 (2003): 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Zigrino P., Brinckmann J., Niehoff A., et al., “Fibroblast‐Derived MMP‐14 Regulates Collagen Homeostasis in Adult Skin,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 136, no. 8 (2016): 1575–1583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Sabeh F., Ota I., Holmbeck K., et al., “Tumor Cell Traffic Through the Extracellular Matrix Is Controlled by the Membrane‐Anchored Collagenase MT1‐MMP,” Journal of Cell Biology 167, no. 4 (2004): 769–781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Zheng B., Zhang Z., Black C. M., de Crombrugghe B., and Denton C. P., “Ligand‐Dependent Genetic Recombination in Fibroblasts: A Potentially Powerful Technique for Investigating Gene Function in Fibrosis,” American Journal of Pathology 160, no. 5 (2002): 1609–1617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Gutierrez‐Fernandez A., Soria‐Valles C., Osorio F. G., et al., “Loss of MT1‐MMP Causes Cell Senescence and Nuclear Defects Which Can be Reversed by Retinoic Acid,” EMBO Journal 34, no. 14 (2015): 1875–1888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Itoh Y. and Seiki M., “MT1‐MMP: A Potent Modifier of Pericellular Microenvironment,” Journal of Cellular Physiology 206, no. 1 (2006): 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Ivanova I., Kurz B., Lang K., Maisch T., Berneburg M., and Kamenisch Y., “Investigation of the HelioVital Filter Foil Revealed Protective Effects Against UVA1 Irradiation‐Induced DNA Damage and Against UVA1‐Induced Expression of Matrixmetalloproteinases (MMP) MMP1, MMP2, MMP3 and MMP15,” Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences 21, no. 3 (2022): 361–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Taddese S., Weiss A. S., Jahreis G., Neubert R. H. H., and Schmelzer C. E. H., “In Vitro Degradation of Human Tropoelastin by MMP‐12 and the Generation of Matrikines From Domain 24,” Matrix Biology 28, no. 2 (2009): 84–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Chung J. H., Seo J. Y., Lee M. K., et al., “Ultraviolet Modulation of Human Macrophage Metalloelastase in Human Skin In Vivo,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 119, no. 2 (2002): 507–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Taddese S., Weiss A. S., Neubert R. H. H., and Schmelzer C. E. H., “Mapping of Macrophage Elastase Cleavage Sites in Insoluble Human Skin Elastin,” Matrix Biology 27, no. 5 (2008): 420–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Lenci E., Cosottini L., and Trabocchi A., “Novel Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors: An Updated Patent Review (2014–2020),” Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents 31, no. 6 (2021): 509–523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Yuan H., Ma Q., Ye L., and Piao G., “The Traditional Medicine and Modern Medicine From Natural Products,” Molecules 21, no. 5 (2016): 559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Costa S., Schwaiger S., Cervellati R., Stuppner H., Speroni E., and Guerra M. C., “In Vitro Evaluation of the Chemoprotective Action Mechanisms of Leontopodic Acid Against Aflatoxin B1 and Deoxynivalenol‐Induced Cell Damage,” Journal of Applied Toxicology 29, no. 1 (2009): 7–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Pralea I.‐E., Moldovan R. C., Țigu A. B., et al., “Profiling of Polyphenolic Compounds of Leontopodium Alpinum Cass Callus Cultures Using UPLC/IM‐HRMS and Screening of In Vitro Effects,” Plants 11, no. 1 (2021): 100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Reisinger U., Schwaiger S., Zeller I., et al., “Leoligin, the Major Lignan From Edelweiss, Inhibits Intimal Hyperplasia of Venous Bypass Grafts,” Cardiovascular Research 82, no. 3 (2009): 542–549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Dobner M. J., Sosa S., Schwaiger S., et al., “Anti‐Inflammatory Activity of Leontopodium alpinum and Its Constituents,” Planta Medica 70, no. 06 (2004): 502–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Speroni E., Schwaiger S., Egger P., et al., “In Vivo Efficacy of Different Extracts of Edelweiss (Leontopodium alpinum Cass.) in Animal Models,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 105, no. 3 (2006): 421–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Meng X., Guo M., Geng Z., et al., “Effects and Mechanism of the Leontopodium alpinum Callus Culture Extract on Blue Light Damage in Human Foreskin Fibroblasts,” Molecules 28, no. 5 (2023): 2172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Son E., Lee Y. M., Kim S. H., and Kim D. S., “Photoprotective Effects of Processed Ginseng Leaf Administration Against UVB‐Induced Skin Damage in Hairless Mice,” Molecules 28, no. 18 (2023): 6734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Meng Q., Niu Y., Niu X., Roubin R. H., and Hanrahan J. R., “Ethnobotany, Phytochemistry and Pharmacology of the Genus Caragana Used in Traditional Chinese Medicine,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 124, no. 3 (2009): 350–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Lee S. R., Kwak J. H., Kim H. J., and Pyo S., “Neuroprotective Effects of Kobophenol Against the Withdrawal of Tropic Support, Nitrosative Stress, and Mitochondrial Damage in SH‐SY5Y Neuroblastoma Cells,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 17, no. 7 (2007): 1879–1882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Zhao B., Liu J. Q., Zheng Z., et al., “Human Amniotic Epithelial Stem Cells Promote Wound Healing by Facilitating Migration and Proliferation of Keratinocytes via ERK, JNK and AKT Signaling Pathways,” Cell and Tissue Research 365 (2016): 85–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Kim M.‐S., Kim Y. K., Eun H. C., Cho K. H., and Chung J. H., “All‐Trans Retinoic Acid Antagonizes UV‐Induced VEGF Production and Angiogenesis via the Inhibition of ERK Activation in Human Skin Keratinocytes,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 126, no. 12 (2006): 2697–2706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Kim H.‐E., Cho H., Ishihara A., Kim B., and Kim O., “Cell Proliferation and Migration Mechanism of Caffeoylserotonin and Serotonin via Serotonin 2B Receptor in Human Keratinocyte HaCaT Cells,” BMB Reports 51, no. 4 (2018): 188–193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Kang J., Chen W., Xia J., et al., “Extracellular Matrix Secreted by Senescent Fibroblasts Induced by UVB Promotes Cell Proliferation in HaCaT Cells Through PI3K/AKT and ERK Signaling Pathways,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine 21, no. 6 (2008): 777–784. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Su L., Fu L., Li X., et al., “Loss of CAR Promotes Migration and Proliferation of HaCaT Cells and Accelerates Wound Healing in Rats via Src‐p38 MAPK Pathway,” Scientific Reports 6, no. 1 (2016): 19735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Zhang J., Li L., Zhang Q., et al., “Microtubule‐Associated Protein 4 Phosphorylation Regulates Epidermal Keratinocyte Migration and Proliferation,” International Journal of Biological Sciences 15, no. 9 (2019): 1962–1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Gazel A., Nijhawan R. I., Walsh R., and Blumenberg M., “Transcriptional Profiling Defines the Roles of ERK and p38 Kinases in Epidermal Keratinocytes,” Journal of Cellular Physiology 215, no. 2 (2008): 292–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Schüppel M., Kürschner U., Kleuser U., Schäfer‐Korting M., and Kleuser B., “Sphingosine 1‐Phosphate Restrains Insulin‐Mediated Keratinocyte Proliferation via Inhibition of Akt Through the S1P2 Receptor Subtype,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 128, no. 7 (2008): 1747–1756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Kim M. J., Won K. J., Kim D. Y., et al., “Skin Wound Healing and Anti‐Wrinkle‐Promoting In Vitro Biological Activities of Caragana sinica Flower Absolute and Its Chemical Composition,” Pharmaceuticals 16, no. 2 (2023): 235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Jeong E. J., Hwang L., Lee M., Lee K. Y., Ahn M. J., and Sung S. H., “Neuroprotective Biflavonoids of Chamaecyparis obtusa Leaves Against Glutamate‐Induced Oxidative Stress in HT22 Hippocampal Cells,” Food and Chemical Toxicology 64 (2014): 397–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Madhuri K. and Naik P. R., “Ameliorative Effect of Borneol, a Natural Bicyclic Monoterpene Against Hyperglycemia, Hyperlipidemia and Oxidative Stress in Streptozotocin‐Induced Diabetic Wistar Rats,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 96 (2017): 336–347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Park C. M. and Yoon H. S., “Anti‐Bacterial Effects of Lavender and Peppermint Oils on Streptococcus mutans ,” Journal of Korean Academy of Oral Health 42, no. 4 (2018): 210–215. [Google Scholar]
- 87. Jang Y.‐A., Kim S. G., Kim H. K., and Lee J. T., “Biological Activity and Component Analyses of Chamaecyparis obtusa Leaf Extract: Evaluation of Antiwrinkle and Cell Protection Effects in UVA‐Irradiated Cells,” Medicina 59, no. 4 (2023): 755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Choi J. M., Lee S. I., and Cho E. J., “Effect of Vigna angularis on High‐Fat Diet‐Induced Memory and Cognitive Impairments,” Journal of Medicinal Food 23, no. 11 (2020): 1155–1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Oh S., Zheng S., Fang M., et al., “Anti‐Photoaging Effect of Phaseolus angularis L. Extract on UVB‐Exposed HaCaT Keratinocytes and Possibilities as Cosmetic Materials,” Molecules 28, no. 3 (2023): 1407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Bunawan H., Baharum S. N., Bunawan S. N., Amin N. M., and Noor N. M., “ Cosmos caudatus Kunth: A Traditional Medicinal Herb,” Global Journal of Pharmacology 8, no. 3 (2014): 420–426. [Google Scholar]
- 91. Cheng S.‐H., Barakatun‐Nisak M. Y., Anthony J., and Ismail A., “Potential Medicinal Benefits of Cosmos caudatus (Ulam Raja): A Scoping Review,” Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: The Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 20, no. 10 (2015): 1000–1006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Loo Y. C., Hu H. C., Yu S. Y., et al., “Development on Potential Skin Anti‐Aging Agents of Cosmos caudatus Kunth via Inhibition of Collagenase, MMP‐1 and MMP‐3 Activities,” Phytomedicine 110 (2023): 154643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Park Y.‐J., Kim M., and Bae S.‐J., “Enhancement of Anticarcinogenic Effect by Combination of Lycii fructus With Vitamin C,” Journal‐Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition 31, no. 1 (2002): 143–148. [Google Scholar]
- 94. Park J.‐S., Park J. D., Lee B. C., Choi K.‐J., Ra S.‐W., and Chang K.‐W., “Effects of Extracts From Various Parts of Lycium chinense Mill. on the Proliferation of Mouse Spleen Cells,” Korean Journal of Medicinal Crop Science 8, no. 4 (2000): 291–296. [Google Scholar]
- 95. Kang K.‐I., Jung J.‐Y., Koh K.‐H., and Lee C.‐H., “Hepatoprotective Effects of Lycium chinense Mill. Fruit Extracts and Fresh Fruit Juice,” Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology 38, no. 1 (2006): 99–103. [Google Scholar]
- 96. Deng H.‐B., Cui D. P., Jiang J. M., Feng Y. C., Cai N. S., and Li D. D., “Inhibiting Effects of Achyranthes bidentata Polysaccharide and Lycium barbarum Polysaccharide on Nonenzyme Glycation in D‐Galactose Induced Mouse Aging Model,” Biomedical and Environmental Sciences: BES 16, no. 3 (2003): 267–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Debib A., Dueñas M., Boumediene M., Mothana R. A., Latifa A., and Tir‐Touil M. A., “Synergetic Hepatoprotective Effect of Phenolic Fractions Obtained From Ficus carica Dried Fruit and Extra Virgin Olive Oil on CCL4‐Induced Oxidative Stress and Hepatotoxicity in Rats,” Journal of Food Biochemistry 40, no. 4 (2016): 507–516. [Google Scholar]
- 98. Seo H., Kim C., Kim M. B., and Hwang J. K., “Anti‐Photoaging Effect of Korean Mint (Agastache rugosa Kuntze) Extract on UVB‐Irradiated Human Dermal Fibroblasts,” Preventive Nutrition and Food Science 24, no. 4 (2019): 442–448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Yun M.‐S., Kim C., and Hwang J.‐K., “ Agastache rugosa Kuntze Attenuates UVB‐Induced Photoaging in Hairless Mice Through the Regulation of MAPK/AP‐1 and TGF‐β/Smad Pathways,” Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 29, no. 9 (2019): 1349–1360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Yoo J. H., Lee J. S., Jang J. H., Jung J. I., Kim E. J., and Choi S. Y., “AGEs Blocker™(Goji Berry, fig, and Korean Mint Mixed Extract) Inhibits Skin Aging Caused by Streptozotocin‐Induced Glycation in Hairless Mice,” Preventive Nutrition and Food Science 28, no. 2 (2023): 134–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Jung J., Choi Y. J., Yoo J. H., Choi S. Y., and Kim E. J., “Antiphotoaging Effect of AGEs Blocker™ in UVB‐Irradiated Cells and Skh: HR‐1 Hairless Mice,” Current Issues in Molecular Biology 45, no. 5 (2023): 4181–4199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Ulven S. M., Kirkhus B., Lamglait A., et al., “Metabolic Effects of Krill Oil Are Essentially Similar to Those of Fish Oil but at Lower Dose of EPA and DHA, in Healthy Volunteers,” Lipids 46, no. 1 (2011): 37–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Kim J., Lee N., Chun Y. S., Lee S. H., and Ku S. K., “Krill Oil's Protective Benefits Against Ultraviolet B‐Induced Skin Photoaging in Hairless Mice and In Vitro Experiments,” Marine Drugs 21, no. 9 (2023): 479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Patel B. K., Patel K. H., Huang R. Y., Lee C. N., and Moochhala S. M., “The Gut‐Skin Microbiota Axis and Its Role in Diabetic Wound Healing—A Review Based on Current Literature,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 4 (2022): 2375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Lee S.‐Y., Lee E., Park Y. M., and Hong S. J., “Microbiome in the Gut‐Skin Axis in Atopic Dermatitis,” Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research 10, no. 4 (2018): 354–362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Park J.‐Y., Lee J. Y., Kim Y. G., and Kang C. H., “ Latilactobacillus sakei Wikim0066 Protects Skin Through MMP Regulation on UVB‐Irradiated In Vitro and In Vivo Model,” Nutrients 15, no. 3 (2023): 726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Zhang X., Xu J., Ma M., et al., “Heat‐Killed Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 7469 Improved UVB‐Induced Photoaging via Antiwrinkle and Antimelanogenesis Impacts,” Photochemistry and Photobiology 99 (2023): 1318–1331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Hamayun M., Khan S. A., EunYoung S., EunYoung S., and InJung L. I. J. L., “Folk Medicinal Knowledge and Conservation Status of Some Economically Valued Medicinal Plants of District Swat, Pakistan,” Lyonia 11, no. 2 (2006): 101–113. [Google Scholar]
- 109. Hamayun M., “Ethnobotanical Studies of Some Useful Shrubs and Trees of District Buner, NWFP, Pakistan,” Ethnobotanical Leaflets 2003, no. 1 (2003): 12. [Google Scholar]
- 110. Cohen P. A., Travis J. C., Keizers P. H. J., Boyer F. E., and Venhuis B. J., “The Stimulant Higenamine in Weight Loss and Sports Supplements,” Clinical Toxicology 57, no. 2 (2019): 125–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Kim D., Yun J. H., Roh E., Shin H. S., and Kim J. E., “Higenamine Reduces Fine‐Dust‐Induced Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP)‐1 in Human Keratinocytes,” Plants 12, no. 13 (2023): 2479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Chen F., Guo X., and Wu Y., “Skin Antiaging Effects of a Multiple Mechanisms Hyaluronan Complex,” Skin Research and Technology 29, no. 6 (2023): e13350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Guo Y., Zhang Y., Wang Y. S., Ma L. Y., Liu H., and Gao W., “Protective Effect of Salvia plebeia R. Br Ethanol Extract on UVB‐Induced Skin Photoaging In Vitro and In Vivo,” Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine 39 (2023): 466–477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Pandey R. K., Goswami L. N., Chen Y., et al., “Nature: A Rich Source for Developing Multifunctional Agents. Tumor‐Imaging and Photodynamic Therapy,” Lasers in Surgery and Medicine: The Official Journal of the American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery 38, no. 5 (2006): 445–467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Liu X., Zhang R., Shi H., et al., “Protective Effect of Curcumin Against Ultraviolet A Irradiation‐Induced Photoaging in Human Dermal Fibroblasts,” Molecular Medicine Reports 17, no. 5 (2018): 7227–7237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Zhang L., Gan J. Q., and Wang H., “Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Mathematical Giftedness: A Literature Review,” Applied Neuropsychology: Child 6, no. 1 (2017): 79–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Jalde S. S., Chauhan A. K., Lee J. H., Chaturvedi P. K., Park J. S., and Kim Y. W., “Synthesis of Novel Chlorin e6‐Curcumin Conjugates as Photosensitizers for Photodynamic Therapy Against Pancreatic Carcinoma,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 147 (2018): 66–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Thapa Magar T. B., Mallik S. K., Gurung P., et al., “Chlorin E6‐Curcumin‐Mediated Photodynamic Therapy Promotes an Anti‐Photoaging Effect in UVB‐Irradiated Fibroblasts,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 17 (2023): 13468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Ip F. C., Ng Y. P., An H. J., et al., “Cycloastragenol Is a Potent Telomerase Activator in Neuronal Cells: Implications for Depression Management,” Neurosignals 22, no. 1 (2014): 52–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Yu Y., Zhou L., Yang Y., and Liu Y., “Cycloastragenol: An Exciting Novel Candidate for Age‐Associated Diseases,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 16, no. 3 (2018): 2175–2182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Yang M. H., Hwang S. T., Um J. Y., and Ahn K. S., “Cycloastragenol Exerts Protective Effects Against UVB Irradiation in Human Dermal Fibroblasts and HaCaT Keratinocytes,” Journal of Dermatological Science 111, no. 2 (2023): 60–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Lee H. J., Im A. R., Kim S. M., Kang H. S., Lee J. D., and Chae S., “The Flavonoid Hesperidin Exerts Anti‐Photoaging Effect by Downregulating Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP)‐9 Expression via Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK)‐Dependent Signaling Pathways,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 18 (2018): 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Sheen Y. S., Huang H. Y., and Liao Y. H., “The Efficacy and Safety of an Antiaging Topical Serum Containing Hesperetin and Sodium Cyclic Lysophosphatidic Acid: A Single‐Center Clinical Trial,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 20, no. 12 (2021): 3960–3967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Pageon H., Azouaoui A., Zucchi H., Ricois S., Tran C., and Asselineau D., “Potentially Beneficial Effects of Rhamnose on Skin Ageing: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study,” International Journal of Cosmetic Science 41, no. 3 (2019): 213–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Novotná R., Škařupová D., Hanyk J., et al., “Hesperidin, Hesperetin, Rutinose, and Rhamnose Act as Skin Anti‐Aging Agents,” Molecules 28, no. 4 (2023): 1728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Hong Q., Wang S., Liu S., Chen X., and Cai G., “LRG1 May Accelerate the Progression of ccRCC via the TGF‐β Pathway,” BioMed Research International 2020 (2020): 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Park H. N., Song M. J., Choi Y. E., Lee D. H., Chung J. H., and Lee S. T., “LRG1 Promotes ECM Integrity by Activating the TGF‐β Signaling Pathway in Fibroblasts,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 15 (2023): 12445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Ham S. M., Song M. J., Yoon H. S., Lee D. H., Chung J. H., and Lee S. T., “SPARC Is Highly Expressed in Young Skin and Promotes Extracellular Matrix Integrity in Fibroblasts via the TGF‐β Signaling Pathway,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 15 (2023): 12179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Zhou Y., Bai R., Huang Y., et al., “The Anti‐Photoaging Effect of C‐Phycocyanin on Ultraviolet B‐Irradiated BALB/c‐Nu Mouse Skin,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 11 (2023): 1229387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Cho W., Park J., Lee M., et al., “Gly‐Pro‐Val‐Gly‐Pro‐Ser Peptide Fish Collagen Improves Skin Moisture and Wrinkles With Ameliorated the Oxidative Stress and Pro‐Inflammatory Factors in Skin Photoaging Mimic Models,” Preventive Nutrition and Food Science 28, no. 1 (2023): 50–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Olsen R. and DeLorey T., “GABA and Glycine,” in Basic Neurochemistry: Molecular, Cellular and Medical Aspects, eds. Siegel G. J., Agranoff B. W., Albers R. W., Fisher S. K., and Uhler M. D. (Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 1999), 335–346. [Google Scholar]
- 132. Warskulat U., Reinen A., Grether‐Beck S., Krutmann J., and Häussinger D., “The Osmolyte Strategy of Normal Human Keratinocytes in Maintaining Cell Homeostasis,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 123, no. 3 (2004): 516–521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Ito K., Tanaka K., Nishibe Y., Hasegawa J., and Ueno H., “GABA‐Synthesizing Enzyme, GAD67, From Dermal Fibroblasts: Evidence for a New Skin Function,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—General Subjects 1770, no. 2 (2007): 291–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Zhao H., Park B., Kim M. J., et al., “The Effect of γ‐Aminobutyric Acid Intake on UVB‐Induced Skin Damage in Hairless Mice,” Biomolecules & Therapeutics 31, no. 6 (2023): 640–647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Le L. T. T., Kim B. K., Chien P. N., et al., “Investigating the Anti‐Aging Effects of Caviar Oil on Human Skin,” In Vivo 37, no. 5 (2023): 2078–2091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Essendoubi M., Gobinet C., Reynaud R., Angiboust J. F., Manfait M., and Piot O., “Human Skin Penetration of Hyaluronic Acid of Different Molecular Weights as Probed by Raman Spectroscopy,” Skin Research and Technology 22, no. 1 (2016): 55–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Gariboldi S., Palazzo M., Zanobbio L., et al., “Low Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid Increases the Self‐Defense of Skin Epithelium by Induction of β‐Defensin 2 via TLR2 and TLR4,” Journal of Immunology 181, no. 3 (2008): 2103–2110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Meunier M., Scandolera A., Chapuis E., et al., “The Anti‐Wrinkles Properties of Sodium Acetylated Hyaluronate,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 21, no. 7 (2022): 2749–2762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Song Y.‐R., Lim W. C., Han A., et al., “Rose Petal Extract (Rosa gallica) Exerts Skin Whitening and Anti‐Skin Wrinkle Effects,” Journal of Medicinal Food 23, no. 8 (2020): 870–878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Miura T., Ichiki H., Iwamoto N., et al., “Antidiabetic Activity of the Rhizoma of Anemarrhena Asphodeloides and Active Components, Mangiferin and Its Glucoside,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 24, no. 9 (2001): 1009–1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Wang Y., Dan Y., Yang D., et al., “The Genus Anemarrhena Bunge: A Review on Ethnopharmacology, Phytochemistry and Pharmacology,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 153, no. 1 (2014): 42–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Im A. R., Seo Y. K., Cho S. H., O K. H., Kim K. M., and Chae S., “Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of a Timosaponin A‐III‐Based Antiwrinkle Agent Against Skin Aging,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 19, no. 2 (2020): 423–436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Du R. and Lei T., “Effects of Autologous Platelet‐Rich Plasma Injections on Facial Skin Rejuvenation,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 19, no. 4 (2020): 3024–3030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Hu S., Li Z., Cores J., et al., “Needle‐Free Injection of Exosomes Derived From Human Dermal Fibroblast Spheroids Ameliorates Skin Photoaging,” ACS Nano 13, no. 10 (2019): 11273–11282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Molinari J., Ruszova E., Velebny V., and Robert L., “Effect of Advanced Glycation Endproducts on Gene Expression Profiles of Human Dermal Fibroblasts,” Biogerontology 9 (2008): 177–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Rittié L., Berton A., Monboisse J. C., Hornebeck W., and Gillery P., “Decreased Contraction of Glycated Collagen Lattices Coincides With Impaired Matrix Metalloproteinase Production,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 264, no. 2 (1999): 488–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Fields G. B., “The Rebirth of Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors: Moving Beyond the Dogma,” Cells 8, no. 9 (2019): 984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Hadler‐Olsen E., Winberg J.‐O., and Uhlin‐Hansen L., “Matrix Metalloproteinases in Cancer: Their Value as Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers and Therapeutic Targets,” Tumor Biology 34 (2013): 2041–2051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Butler G. S. and Overall C. M., “Updated Biological Roles for Matrix Metalloproteinases and New “Intracellular” Substrates Revealed by Degradomics,” Biochemistry 48, no. 46 (2009): 10830–10845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Beckett R. P. and Whittaker M., “Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors 1998,” Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents 8, no. 3 (1998): 259–282. [Google Scholar]
- 151. Whittaker M., Floyd C. D., Brown P., and Gearing A. J. H., “Design and Therapeutic Application of Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors. (Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2735–2776. Published on the Web September 8, 1999),” Chemical Reviews 101, no. 7 (2001): 2205–2206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Martel‐Pelletier J., Welsch D. J., and Pelletier J.‐P., “Metalloproteases and Inhibitors in Arthritic Diseases,” Best Practice & Research. Clinical Rheumatology 15, no. 5 (2001): 805–829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Burrage P. and Brinckerhoff C., “Molecular Targets in Osteoarthritis: Metalloproteinases and Their Inhibitors,” Current Drug Targets 8, no. 2 (2007): 293–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Chopra S., Overall C. M., and Dufour A., “Matrix Metalloproteinases in the CNS: Interferons Get Nervous,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 76, no. 16 (2019): 3083–3095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Khokha R., Murthy A., and Weiss A., “Metalloproteinases and Their Natural Inhibitors in Inflammation and Immunity,” Nature Reviews Immunology 13, no. 9 (2013): 649–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Gao M., Nguyen T. T., Suckow M. A., et al., “Acceleration of Diabetic Wound Healing Using a Novel Protease–Anti‐Protease Combination Therapy,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, no. 49 (2015): 15226–15231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Caley M. P., Martins V. L., and O'Toole E. A., “Metalloproteinases and Wound Healing,” Advances in Wound Care 4, no. 4 (2015): 225–234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Fields G. B., “Mechanisms of Action of Novel Drugs Targeting Angiogenesis‐Promoting Matrix Metalloproteinases,” Frontiers in Immunology 10 (2019): 1278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
