Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA logoLink to Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
. 1995 Nov-Dec;2(6):365–373. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1995.96157829

Evaluation of reporting based on descriptional knowledge.

P W Moorman 1, A M van Ginneken 1, P D Siersema 1, J van der Lei 1, J H van Bemmel 1
PMCID: PMC116279  PMID: 8581552

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In an attempt to enhance the completeness and clarity of clinical narratives, the authors developed a general formalism for the entry of structured data. The objective of this study was to gain insight into the expressive power of the formalism through its use for reporting in endoscopy. DESIGN: Each of ten endoscopists reported twice about eight endoscopy videotapes. They produced free-text reports first, and then structured reports using this formalism. Statements in the resulting reports were compared. RESULTS: In total, 6.8% of the endoscopists' statements could not be expressed in structured options. Most of these statements were not due to limitations of the formalism itself. Topics mentioned in the free-text reports were described more frequently in the structured reports and, in addition, the structured reports included a greater variety of topics. Overall, increases of 83% for topics not related to abnormal findings (366 in free-text reports and 671 in structured reports) and 45% for features of abnormal findings (406 in free-text reports and 586 in structured reports) were observed. Although there was an overall information gain, features of abnormal findings were, on average, described by only half of the endoscopists. CONCLUSION: The expressive power of this formalism is promising, but general, multipurpose usage of the acquired data requires that topics be described by a larger percentage of physicians. Since this formalism led to more complete and more uniform data, additional research is justified to study how spontaneous reporting can be augmented further. The few subjects that occurred less often in structured reports suggest a possible negligence effect of structured reporting.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (957.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barnett G. O. The application of computer-based medical-record systems in ambulatory practice. N Engl J Med. 1984 Jun 21;310(25):1643–1650. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198406213102506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell D. S., Greenes R. A. Evaluation of UltraSTAR: performance of a collaborative structured data entry system. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:216–222. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gouveia-Oliveira A., Raposo V. D., Salgado N. C., Almeida I., Nobre-Leitão C., de Melo F. G. Longitudinal comparative study on the influence of computers on reporting of clinical data. Endoscopy. 1991 Nov;23(6):334–337. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1010710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kent D. L., Shortliffe E. H., Carlson R. W., Bischoff M. B., Jacobs C. D. Improvements in data collection through physician use of a computer-based chemotherapy treatment consultant. J Clin Oncol. 1985 Oct;3(10):1409–1417. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1985.3.10.1409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kuhn K., Gaus W., Wechsler J. G., Janowitz P., Tudyka J., Kratzer W., Swobodnik W., Ditschuneit H. Structured reporting of medical findings: evaluation of a system in gastroenterology. Methods Inf Med. 1992 Nov;31(4):268–274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McDonald C. J., Tierney W. M., Overhage J. M., Martin D. K., Wilson G. A. The Regenstrief Medical Record System: 20 years of experience in hospitals, clinics, and neighborhood health centers. MD Comput. 1992 Jul-Aug;9(4):206–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Moorman P. W., van Ginneken A. M., van der Lei J., Siersema P. D., van Blankenstein M., Wilson J. H. The contents of free-text endoscopy reports: an inventory and evaluation by peers. Endoscopy. 1994 Aug;26(6):531–538. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1009029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Moorman P. W., van Ginneken A. M., van der Lei J., van Bemmel J. H. A model for structured data entry based on explicit descriptional knowledge. Methods Inf Med. 1994 Dec;33(5):454–463. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stead W. W., Hammond W. E. Computer-based medical records: the centerpiece of TMR. MD Comput. 1988 Sep-Oct;5(5):48–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wrenn K., Rodewald L., Lumb E., Slovis C. The use of structured, complaint-specific patient encounter forms in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1993 May;22(5):805–812. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)80796-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. van Ginneken A. M., Stam H., Moorman P. W. A multi-strategy approach for medical records of specialists. Medinfo. 1995;8(Pt 1):290–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. van der Lei J., Duisterhout J. S., Westerhof H. P., van der Does E., Cromme P. V., Boon W. M., van Bemmel J. H. The introduction of computer-based patient records in The Netherlands. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Nov 15;119(10):1036–1041. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-10-199311150-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. van der Lei J., Duisterhout J. S., Westerhof H. P., van der Does E., Cromme P. V., Boon W. M., van Bemmel J. H. The introduction of computer-based patient records in The Netherlands. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Nov 15;119(10):1036–1041. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-10-199311150-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES