Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA logoLink to Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
. 1996 Jan-Feb;3(1):42–55. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1996.96342648

Implementation of physician order entry: user satisfaction and self-reported usage patterns.

F Lee 1, J M Teich 1, C D Spurr 1, D W Bates 1
PMCID: PMC116286  PMID: 8750389

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate user satisfaction, correlates of satisfaction, and self-reported usage patterns regarding physician order entry (POE) in one hospital. DESIGN: Surveys were sent to physician and nurse POE users from medical and surgical services. RESULTS: The users were generally satisfied with POE (mean = 5.07 on a 1 to 7 scale). The physicians were more satisfied than the nurses, and the medical staff were more satisfied than the surgical staff; satisfaction levels were acceptable (more than 3.50) even in the less satisfied groups. Satisfaction was highly correlated with perceptions about POE's effects on productivity, ease of use, and speed. POE features directed at improving the quality of care were less strongly correlated with satisfaction. The physicians valued POE's off-floor accessibility most, and the nurses valued legibility and accuracy of POE orders most. Some features, such as off-floor ordering, were perceived to be highly useful and reported to be frequently used by the physicians; while other features, such as "quick mode'' ordering and personal order sets, received little self-reported use. CONCLUSIONS: Survey of POE users showed that satisfaction with POE was good. Satisfaction was more correlated with perceptions about POE's effect on productivity than with POE's effect on quality of care. Physicians and nurses constitute two very different types of users, underscoring the importance of involving both physicians and nonphysicians in POE development. The results suggest that development efforts should focus on improving system speed, adding on-line help, and emphasizing quality benefits of POE.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bates D. W., Boyle D. L., Teich J. M. Impact of computerized physician order entry on physician time. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:996–996. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates D. W., Cullen D. J., Laird N., Petersen L. A., Small S. D., Servi D., Laffel G., Sweitzer B. J., Shea B. F., Hallisey R. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1995 Jul 5;274(1):29–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates D. W., Kuperman G., Teich J. M. Computerized physician order entry and quality of care. Qual Manag Health Care. 1994 Summer;2(4):18–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates D. W., O'Neil A. C., Boyle D., Teich J., Chertow G. M., Komaroff A. L., Brennan T. A. Potential identifiability and preventability of adverse events using information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994 Sep-Oct;1(5):404–411. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95153428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gardner R. M., Lundsgaarde H. P. Evaluation of user acceptance of a clinical expert system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994 Nov-Dec;1(6):428–438. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95153432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Johnston M. E., Langton K. B., Haynes R. B., Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jan 15;120(2):135–142. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-2-199401150-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Leape L. L., Bates D. W., Cullen D. J., Cooper J., Demonaco H. J., Gallivan T., Hallisey R., Ives J., Laird N., Laffel G. Systems analysis of adverse drug events. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1995 Jul 5;274(1):35–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Massaro T. A. Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: I. Impact on organizational culture and behavior. Acad Med. 1993 Jan;68(1):20–25. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199301000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Massaro T. A. Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: II. Impact on medical education. Acad Med. 1993 Jan;68(1):25–30. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199301000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shortliffe E. H. Medical expert systems--knowledge tools for physicians. West J Med. 1986 Dec;145(6):830–839. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sittig D. F., Stead W. W. Computer-based physician order entry: the state of the art. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994 Mar-Apr;1(2):108–123. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95236142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Teich J. M., Hurley J. F., Beckley R. F., Aranow M. Design of an easy-to-use physician order entry system with support for nursing and ancillary departments. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992:99–103. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Teich J. M., Spurr C. D., Flammini S. J., Schmiz J., Beckley R. F., Hurley J. F., Aranow M., Glaser J. P. Response to a trial of physician-based inpatient order entry. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993:316–320. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Teich J. M., Spurr C. D., Schmiz J. L., O'Connell E. M., Thomas D. Enhancement of clinician workflow with computer order entry. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995:459–463. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tierney W. M., Miller M. E., Overhage J. M., McDonald C. J. Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Effects on resource utilization. JAMA. 1993 Jan 20;269(3):379–383. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES