Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 1981 Jun 1;195(3):723–734. doi: 10.1042/bj1950723

Divergence, differential methylation and interspersion of melon satellite DNA sequences.

R Shmookler Reis, J N Timmis, J Ingle
PMCID: PMC1162945  PMID: 6172117

Abstract

Melon (Cucumis melo) satellite DNA consists of two components, Q and S, each with a buoyant density in CsCl of 1.707 g/ml, but differing by 9 degrees C in "melting" temperature. These physical properties appear to be in contradiction, since both depend on G + C content. In order to resolve this anomaly, base compositions were directly determined for isolated fractions. the low-"melting" component S contains 41.8% G + C, with 6% of C present as 5-methylcytosine, whereas Q DNA contains 54% G + C, with 41% of C methylated. Analyses of restriction site loss agreed well with the direct determinations of methylation and divergence, and indicated some clustering of methylated sites in Q DNA. Analysis of restricted main-band DNA by hydridization with RNA complementary to Q satellite DNA ("Southern transfer") showed satellite Q tandem arrays interspersed in DNA of main-band density. Sequence divergence and extent of methylation did not appear to depend on whether a repeat array was present as satellite or interspersed in main-band DNA. Hydridization in situ indicated considerable heterogeneity in the genomic proportion of the Q-DNA sequences in melon fruit nuclei, implying over- and under-representation consistent with extensive unequal recombination in satellite Q tandem arrays. The cucumber, Cucumis sativus, contains less than 8% as much Q-homologous DNA per genome as the melon, suggesting rapid evolutionary gain or loss of these tandem repeat sequences.

Full text

PDF
723

Images in this article

726Fig. 2.
on p.726
728-1PLATE 1
on p.728-1
728Fig. 4.
on p.728
731Fig. 10.
on p.731

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baetcke K. P., Sparrow A. H., Nauman C. H., Schwemmer S. S. The relationship of DNA content to nuclear and chromosome volumes and to radiosensitivity (LD50). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Aug;58(2):533–540. doi: 10.1073/pnas.58.2.533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bendich A. J., Anderson R. S. Novel properties of satellite DNA from muskmelon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Apr;71(4):1511–1515. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bendich A. J., Taylor W. C. Sequence arrangement in satellite DNA from the muskmelon. Plant Physiol. 1977 Apr;59(4):604–609. doi: 10.1104/pp.59.4.604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bird A. P., Southern E. M. Use of restriction enzymes to study eukaryotic DNA methylation: I. The methylation pattern in ribosomal DNA from Xenopus laevis. J Mol Biol. 1978 Jan 5;118(1):27–47. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90242-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bond H. E., Flamm W. G., Burr H. E., Bond S. B. Mouse satellite DNA. Further studies on its biological and physical characteristics and its intracellular localization. J Mol Biol. 1967 Jul 28;27(2):289–302. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(67)90021-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Corneo G., Ginelli E., Soave C., Bernardi G. Isolation and characterization of mouse and guinea pig satellite deoxyribonucleic acids. Biochemistry. 1968 Dec;7(12):4373–4379. doi: 10.1021/bi00852a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gall J. G., Atherton D. D. Satellite DNA sequences in Drosophila virilis. J Mol Biol. 1974 Jan 5;85(4):633–664. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90321-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ingle J., Pearson G. G., Sinclair J. Species distribution and properties of nuclear satellite DNA in higher plants. Nat New Biol. 1973 Apr 18;242(120):193–197. doi: 10.1038/newbio242193a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kirk J. T. Effect of methylation of cytosine residues on the buoyant density of DNA in caesium chloride solution. J Mol Biol. 1967 Aug 28;28(1):171–172. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(67)80087-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MARMUR J., DOTY P. Determination of the base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid from its thermal denaturation temperature. J Mol Biol. 1962 Jul;5:109–118. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(62)80066-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Moore G. P., Scheller R. H., Davidson E. H., Britten R. J. Evolutionary change in the repetition frequency of sea urchin DNA sequences. Cell. 1978 Oct;15(2):649–660. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90033-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Roy P. H., Smith H. O. DNA methylases of Hemophilus influenzae Rd. II. Partial recognition site base sequences. J Mol Biol. 1973 Dec 25;81(4):445–459. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90516-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. SCHILDKRAUT C. L., MARMUR J., DOTY P. Determination of the base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid from its buoyant density in CsCl. J Mol Biol. 1962 Jun;4:430–443. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(62)80100-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shmookler Reis R. J., Biro P. A. Sequence and evolution of mouse satellite DNA. J Mol Biol. 1978 May 25;121(3):357–374. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90369-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shmookler Reis R. J., Goldstein S. Loss of reiterated DNA sequences during serial passage of human diploid fibroblasts. Cell. 1980 Oct;21(3):739–749. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90437-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sinclair J., Wells R., Deumling B., Ingle J. The complexity of satellite deoxyribonucleic acid in a higher plant. Biochem J. 1975 Jul;149(1):31–38. doi: 10.1042/bj1490031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Slack J. M. The interpretation of oligonucleotide maps. A theoretical study of nucleic acid digests with special reference to repeated diverged sequences. Biopolymers. 1974 Nov;13(11):2241–2264. doi: 10.1002/bip.1974.360131107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Smith G. P. Evolution of repeated DNA sequences by unequal crossover. Science. 1976 Feb 13;191(4227):528–535. doi: 10.1126/science.1251186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith G. P. Unequal crossover and the evolution of multigene families. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1974;38:507–513. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1974.038.01.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Southern E. M. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol. 1975 Nov 5;98(3):503–517. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80083-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Southern E. M. Long range periodicities in mouse satellite DNA. J Mol Biol. 1975 May 5;94(1):51–69. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(75)90404-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tartof K. D. Unequal mitotic sister chromatid exchange and disproportionate replication as mechanisms regulating ribosomal RNA gene redundancy. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1974;38:491–500. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1974.038.01.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Timmis J. N., Deumling B., Ingle J. Localisation of satellite DNA sequences in nuclei and chromosomes of two plants. Nature. 1975 Sep 11;257(5522):152–155. doi: 10.1038/257152a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Timmis J. N., Ingle J. Variation in satellite DNA from some higher plants. Biochem Genet. 1977 Dec;15(11-12):1159–1173. doi: 10.1007/BF00484506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Walker P. M. "Repetitive" DNA in higher organisms. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1971;23:145–190. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(71)90019-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES