Skip to main content
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA logoLink to Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
. 1996 Mar-Apr;3(2):157–167. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1996.96236284

Retrieval feedback in MEDLINE.

P Srinivasan 1
PMCID: PMC116298  PMID: 8653452

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate a new approach for query expansion based on retrieval feedback. The first objective in this study was to examine alternative query-expansion methods within the same retrieval-feedback framework. The three alternatives proposed are: expansion on the MeSH query field alone, expansion on the free-text field alone, and expansion on both the MeSH and the free-text fields. The second objective was to gain further understanding of retrieval feedback by examining possible dependencies on relevant documents during the feedback cycle. DESIGN: Comparative study of retrieval effectiveness using the original unexpanded and the alternative expanded user queries on a MEDLINE test collection of 75 queries and 2,334 MEDLINE citations. MEASUREMENTS: Retrieval effectivenesses of the original unexpanded and the alternative expanded queries were compared using 11-point-average precision scores (11-AvgP). These are averages of precision scores obtained at 11 standard recall points. RESULTS: All three expansion strategies significantly improved the original queries in terms of retrieval effectiveness. Expansion on MeSH alone was equivalent to expansion on both MeSH and the free-text fields. Expansion on the free-text field alone improved the queries significantly less than did the other two strategies. The second part of the study indicated that retrieval-feedback-based expansion yields significant performance improvements independent of the availability of relevant documents for feedback information. CONCLUSIONS: Retrieval feedback offers a robust procedure for query expansion that is most effective for MEDLINE when applied to the MeSH field.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hersh W. R., Hickam D. H., Haynes R. B., McKibbon K. A. A performance and failure analysis of SAPHIRE with a MEDLINE test collection. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994 Jan-Feb;1(1):51–60. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95236136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Rindflesch T. C., Aronson A. R. Ambiguity resolution while mapping free text to the UMLS Metathesaurus. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:240–244. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Yang Y., Chute C. G. Words or concepts: the features of indexing units and their optimal use in information retrieval. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993:685–689. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES