Highlights
-
•
The concept of entropy engineering in inorganic non-metallic glasses is proposed.
-
•
The influence of entropy on glass formation behavior and physical properties of inorganic non-metallic glasses is discussed.
-
•
The opportunities and challenges for the development of novel functional non-metallic glass with the strategy of entropy engineering are presented.
Keywords: Entropy engineering, Inorganic non-metallic glass, Glass formation, Microstructure, Properties
Abstract
Advances in developing high entropy alloys and ceramics with improved physical properties have greatly broadened their application field from aerospace industry, public transportation to nuclear plants. In this review, we describe the concept of entropy engineering as applicable to inorganic non-metallic glasses, especially for tailoring and enhancing their mechanical, electrical, and optical properties. We also present opportunities and challenges in calculating entropy of inorganic non-metallic glass systems, correlating entropy to glass formation, and in developing functional inorganic non-metallic glasses via the entropy concept.
Graphical abstract

1. Introduction
Entropy is an extensive property of a thermodynamic system. It is associated with the confusion degree in a system, along with macroscopic thermodynamic quantities such as volume, pressure, and temperature. For a specific material system, entropy can be mainly of two origins: vibrational and configurational, representing the degree of disorder due to the vibration of molecules, atoms or ions and the diversification of the structural configurations, respectively. In recent years, the entropy engineering concept has been used as an effective way to tune the thermodynamic and physical properties of materials. This concept was proposed by Yeh et al. in 2004 [1] with the purpose to develop novel alloys. The core of the concept is to increase the configurational entropy of an alloy by mixing multiple equimolar or near-equimolar metal elements, thereby to improve its performance. Specially, the alloys with more than five equimolar or near-equimolar base elements are defined as “high entropy alloys” [1,2], which would form single-phase alloys rather than multi-phase mixture of intercrystalline compounds. Over the past seventeen years, the high entropy alloy has been extensively studied and a series of material systems with face-center [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], body-center cubic [9], [10], [11] and hexagonal close packed [12], [13], [14], [15] solid solution structure has been fabricated. In addition to high entropy crystalline alloys, high-entropy amorphous alloys (metallic glasses) [16], [17], [18], [19], [20] have also been developed by using the concept of entropy engineering. Benefitting from the unique structure, the high entropy alloys exhibit excellent mechanical properties such as high strength [12,21], high corrosion resistance [22] and exceptional fracture toughness [23], [24], [25]. Motivated by the substantial progress in the field of high entropy alloys, the entropy engineering concept was further employed to develop novel ceramics [26]. The high entropy ceramics, including oxides [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], carbides [32], [33], [34], [35], diborides [36], [37], [38], [39] and silicides [40,41], have been synthesized, which exhibit remarkable properties such as high hardness [42], high corrosion resistance [43,44], and low thermal conductivity [45,46] compared to conventional ceramics.
As illustrated in Fig. 1a-c, in contrast to metals and ceramics, multicomponent inorganic non-metallic glasses (e.g., oxide, chalcogenide, and fluoride glasses) feature a more complicated microstructure owing to the long-range disordered network consisting of various kinds of local-range and intermediate-range structural units [47]. For this reason, these glasses can be regarded as high entropy systems. The configurational entropy of glasses is higher than that of its crystalline counterpart since there is a larger fluctuation in both bond length and bond angles of the structural units. Furthermore, the entropy contributed from the diversity of composition in multicomponent glasses is believed to be greater than that in alloys and ceramics. The components of inorganic non-metallic glasses can be divided into network formers (e.g., SiO2, GeO2, P2O5, and B2O3), network modifiers (e.g., Li2O, Na2O, and K2O), and network intermediates (e.g., Al2O3, Ga2O3, and ZnO). Thus, we can introduce the concept of entropy engineering into the field of inorganic non-metallic glasses, and thereby design novel glasses with higher entropy. It should be noted that, to the best of our knowledge, the entropy engineering concept has not been purposely introduced and applied for investigating and developing inorganic non-metallic glasses.
Fig. 1.
Schematic illustration of the arrangement of component elements (as represented by the circles in different colors) in the (a) high entropy alloys, (b) high entropy ceramics, and (c) high entropy inorganic non-metallic glasses. (d) The entropy evolution during glass formation.
In this review, we establish the entropy engineering concept regarding inorganic non-metallic glasses. We describe the route to calculate the entropy of inorganic non-metallic glasses and provide insight into the influence of entropy on physical properties of inorganic non-metallic glasses. We describe the potential applications and challenges of the entropy engineering strategy for developing novel inorganic non-metallic glasses.
2. The concept of entropy in inorganic non-metallic glass
According to the definition proposed by Boltzmann, entropy S is usually considered as the measure of the system's disorder, which can be expressed as (at 0 K):
| (1) |
where k is the Boltzmann constant and Ω is the number of microstates. Clausius proposed that for a reversible process, the change in entropy (dS) is given by the second law of thermodynamics:
| (2) |
where Q is the heat supplied to the system and T is temperature. For a system of matter (e.g., alloys, ceramics, and glasses), the degree of the disorder can be described by both the configurational entropy (Sconf) and the vibrational entropy (Svib). Thus, the total entropy of a material system may be expressed as:
| (3) |
where Sconf is mainly determined by the number of components and the number of structural arrangements. An increase of these numbers could lead to higher Sconf. Svib is mainly determined by the intrinsic vibrational properties of the composed molecules, atoms, or ions. Both Sconf and Svib are temperature dependent in different fashions as discussed elsewhere [48,49]. For a solid state (such as alloys, ceramics, and glasses) system, Sconf is thought to dominate the total S of the system [50]. Thus, this article mainly focuses on the contribution of Sconf.
In recent years, the configurational entropy engineering strategy has been proposed with respect to alloy and ceramic materials through multicomponent mixing. The ΔSconf of a system (e.g., alloys and ceramics) due to multicomponent mixing is usually measured by mixed entropy (ΔSmix). In classical equilibrium thermodynamics, the ΔSmix is defined as the increase in the total entropy (ΔS) when several initially separated equilibrium systems with different components are mixed without chemical reaction to a new thermodynamic internal equilibrium system. For a typical equilibrium system (e.g., alloys and ceramics), the relation between ΔSconf and ΔSmix after n components mixing (ignoring the contribution of Svib) can be given as [1,15]:
| (4) |
Thus, Sconf is tuned via changing the component elements, and multicomponent mixing is expected to generate additional configurational entropy. As modelled for the ideal solid solution, ΔSconf in alloys and ceramics can be simply calculated through Eqs. 5 and 6, respectively [1,15,51]:
| (5) |
where R is the gas constant, which is the product of Avagadro constant NA and Boltzmann constant k, and ci is the molar fraction of the ith metal element.
| (6) |
where X and Y are total number of the ions occupying h and k sublattices, Nh and Nk are the number of species occupying h and k sites, and xih and xik are the molar fraction of the ith element that occupies h and k sites. According to Eqs. 5, 6, it can be shown that multicomponent system, especially equimolar mixed materials, would exhibit higher Sconf than the separated systems.
As for inorganic non-metallic glasses, which are the non-equilibrium systems, the ideal equilibrium solid solution model is not suitable for the estimation of ΔSconf. Taking the melt-quenched non-equilibrium glass system as the typical example, the evolution of Svib and Sconf in the whole process from melt state to solid state should be re-analyzed (Fig. 1d). During glass formation, Svib sharply decreases and its contribution to the total change of entropy in the glassy state can be neglected. Instead, Sconf dominates, and S approximately equals Sconf:
| (7) |
In principle, Sconf of an inorganic non-metallic glass system is regarded as the frozen Sconf from the super-cooled liquid at a certain fictive temperature [52]. In details, Sconf in inorganic non-metallic glasses would be related not only to its composition but also to its thermal history during transformation from the liquid melt to the glassy phase. There are two conflicting theoretical models for describing frozen Sconf [49,[53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60]]. According to the conventional view, all the Sconf would be frozen during glass transition and non-zero residual Sconf at 0 K would be observed. Alternatively, the kinetic view considers the occurrence of an entropy loss during the transition from the liquid to glass and the residual Sconf vanishes at 0 K. Both views agree that faster cooling rate during glass transition leads to higher Sconf in inorganic non-metallic glasses [52]. Thus, Sconf of inorganic non-metallic glasses is thermal history dependent [61]. For a certain thermal history, Sconf of inorganic non-metallic glasses can be expressed as [56]:
| (8) |
where pi is the density matrix of the ith microstate of total N of the system and Tr is its trace.
Thus, for mixed non-equilibrium system, such as inorganic non-metallic glasses, the change of the total entropy is caused by both the diversification of the components and the quenching process (the thermal history for inorganic glass). So, the change of total entropy can be calculated via:
| (9) |
where ΔS is the total entropy change, ΔSconf is the configurational entropy change, ΔSmix is the mixed entropy, ΔS′conf is the configurational entropy change due to quenching process for a non-equilibrium system.
Based on above description, it is reasonable that the configurational entropy engineering concept can be extended from the field of alloys and ceramics to that of inorganic non-metallic glasses. Like ceramics and alloys, multicomponent mixed glass system may exhibit higher Sconf than that of its subsystem due to the positive ΔSmix. However, Compared to the equilibrium systems such as ceramics and alloys, Sconf of the non-equilibrium inorganic non-metallic glasses can be adjusted through thermal history manipulation. Faster cooling rate during glass formation is another approach for raising Sconf due to the positive ΔS′conf. For instance, the hyperquenched glasses (cooling at a rate of 106 K/s) exhibit more disordered local microstructure and significantly higher frozen entropy compared with those of the glass cooled at the standard cooling rate of 0.1 K/s [61], [62], [63]. Thus, thermal history (e.g., controlling cooling rate) is another controlling factor for the configurational entropy (ΔS′conf) and physical properties of inorganic non-metallic glasses.
However, the precisely control of thermal history of inorganic non-metallic glasses is still a challenge. Here, the configurational entropy engineering for inorganic non-metallic glasses is discussed based on component diversification (ΔSmix design).
The crucial aspects of the entropy engineering concept, which is based on the component diversification, are demonstrated and compared for alloys, ceramics and inorganic non-metallic glasses as seen in Table 1. For alloys and ceramics, the final product of entropy engineering is a novel single-phase solid solution composed of various kinds of components. The diversification components, which are carefully selected to mitigate the enthalpic penalties, would occupy the specific Wyckoff site of the crystal cell units. The higher entropy solid solutions exhibit the same or similar crystal structure (e.g., space group) compared with their lower entropy subsystems, but with larger local disorder. The unique physical properties of high entropy ceramic and alloy mainly result from the local disorder. As for inorganic non-metallic glasses, entropy engineering would lead to different topological structures from that of its lower entropy subsystems. A prominent feature of glass is that the diversification components can be selected with fewer limits and they are supposed not to occupy a specific site.
Table 1.
The comparison of entropy engineering strategies by component diversification in alloys, ceramics and inorganic non-metallic glasses.
| Phase evolution | Diversified components | Component occupation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alloys | Single phase solid solution | Mainly the metal atoms | Specific Wyckoff site for metal atoms |
| Ceramics | Single phase solid solution | Cations or anions with the same or similar chemical valence | Specific Wyckoff site for cations or anions |
| Inorganic non-metallic glasses | Single phase | Cations or anions with fewer limits | Unspecific sites |
3. Mixed entropy design for control of glass formation
The process of materials synthesis is accompanied by the evolution of the Gibbs free energy of the system. According to the fundamental principles of statistical mechanics, the Gibbs free energy change of the system ∆Gsystem1→2 can be calculated through:
| (10) |
where ∆Hsystem1→2 is the system enthalpy change, T is the temperature and ∆Ssystem1→2 is the system entropy change. For high entropy alloys or ceramics, the Gibbs free energy difference ∆Gseparated→mix between the separated intercrystalline phases and mixed multicomponent high entropy phase would be expressed as:
| (11) |
where ∆Hmix is the mixed enthalpy. In comparison, at high temperature:
| (12) |
which indicates that ∆Gseparated→mix is negative and high entropy multicomponent ceramics and alloys exhibit lower Gibbs energy compared with that of the intercrystalline phases. The tendency of ordering and segregation would be lowered due to the entropy stabilized effect [15,26,64,65]. Thus, high entropy alloys or ceramics are more likely to form random mixed solid solution instead of intercrystalline phases during solidification.
Since the glass is a complicated non-equilibrium state that forms via the melt-quenching process (Fig. 2a), the contribution of ΔSmix to glass formation cannot be solely ascribed to the entropy stabilizing effect, in contrast to the cases in alloys and ceramics. In recent years, the contribution of ΔSmix to glass formation has been analyzed based on crystallization thermodynamics. Guided by the crystallography theory, the total Gibbs energy difference (∆Gl→c) between the liquid and crystalline phase can be expressed as [66,67]:
| (13) |
where ∆gv and σ are the free energy change (driving force) and the interface energy change during the formation of the nuclei from the super-cooled liquid, respectively, r is the radius of nucleus. The critical nucleus radius r* can be calculated by [68]:
| (14) |
and further:
| (15) |
Fig. 2.
Influence of entropy on glass formation. (a) Magnitude and phase profile of ΔGsystem in glass formation and crystallization process. (b) Schematic illustration of liquid phase and crystalline phase of low entropy system (top graph) and high entropy system (bottom graph).
The nucleus with r < r* is unstable, indicating that the larger r* may lead to higher glass formation ability. Making ∆gv less negative is the effective strategy to improve the glass formation ability. At constant pressure, ∆gv can be calculated by [69]:
| (16) |
where ∆Sl→c is the total entropy difference between liquid and crystalline phase at melting point, which is negative, Tm is the melting point, T is the actual temperature and ∆T = Tm-T is the super-cooling degree. According to Eq. (16), less negative ∆Sl→c corresponds to lower tendency for crystallization, and hence, to higher glass forming ability (Fig. 2b).
It is established that the multicomponent mixed system (with higher ΔSmix) exhibits less negative ∆Sl→c compared with that of the separated subsystem (with lower ΔSmix) [69]. That is to say, the high mixed entropy system would exhibit a greater tendency to glass formation. This mixed entropy design strategy was called the “confusion by design” principle for the formation of metallic glass and has become one of the important empirical rules for designing metallic glasses [70]. Although a series of metallic glasses have been designed and fabricated, the “confusion by design” principle has not yet been strictly demonstrated and further studies still need to be done.
In addition, the contribution of ΔSmix to the glass formation has also been analyzed based on crystallization kinetic theory. In crystallization kinetic theory, glass formation ability is governed by the viscosity of the super-cooled liquid. In highly viscous state, the diffusion of atoms (or ions) can be effectively reduced and thus the nucleation and growth of the crystalline phase would be suppressed, finally leading to glass formation. According to the Adams-Gibbs model, the relation between Sconf and viscosity (η) of liquid can be described by [60]:
| (17) |
where A is a constant. The Sconf of the liquid can be determined by the Mauro-Yue-Ellison-Gupta-Allan (MYEGA) equation [49]. The Adams-Gibbs model suggests that high Sconf is inversely correlated with the viscosity of the liquid.
According to Eq. 4, for equilibrium liquid phase, we have the expression:
| (18) |
Due to the positive ΔSmix, the multicomponent mixed system in equilibrium liquid state exhibits higher Sconf. Thus, based on crystallization kinetic theory, multicomponent glass systems with higher configurational entropy may accelerate crystallization and decrease the glass forming ability.
As for inorganic non-metallic glasses, the influence of entropy on glass stability is found to be three-fold. First, high entropy is beneficial to the formation of inorganic non-metallic glass in many cases. As a typical example, pure TeO2 cannot form glassy phase alone, due to its unstable network structure. Enhancement of ΔSmix via adding the network modifiers or intermediates such as Na2O, Nb2O5 and V2O5 can stabilize the unstable structure and highly transparent functional tellurite glasses can be fabricated [71], [72], [73], [74], [75]. This is consistent with above theoretical analysis. Second, the high entropy strategy is not always feasible for improving glass formation. For example, SiO2 is one of the best network formers. However, increasing the entropy of the system via diversifying the composition (e.g., adding Li2O) will decrease the viscosity of the glass melt, resulting in the enhancement of the glass crystallization tendency. Third, the rational control of Sconf via ΔSmix design also facilitates the densification during glass formation. As another typical example, B2O3 is a good glass former. However, it is unstable under ambient condition for long time due to its loose laminated network structure, i.e., it is easy to degrade. It has been demonstrated that the addition of Al2O3 and Na2O can promote the transformation of the loose laminated structure into the dense three-dimensional network structure, contributing to the formation of the stable borate glass system [76], [77], [78]. Thus, entropy engineering provides an effective avenue to tune glass formation and glass stability, and thus, high quality glass can be obtained by entropy engineering.
4. Entropy engineering for control of glass properties
For high entropy ceramics and alloys, besides the direct high entropy effect (entropy stabilized effect), entropy engineering also leads to indirect effects such as cocktail effect and sluggish kinetics, which are thought to be not related to entropy directly but the modification of local structure due to component diversification. These direct and indirect effects have been demonstrated to improve mechanical, electrical and magnetic properties of ceramics and alloys.
Although the high entropy effect of inorganic non-metallic glasses is yet to be established as a topic of glass science, various properties of inorganic non-metallic glasses have been found to be associated with Sconf or the resultant microstructure change due to component diversification. It is necessary to point out that the multicomponent glass systems account for a large proportion of commercial glass products. The established golden rule to tune the glass properties is based on component diversification. This strategy can be regarded as a cocktail effect or sluggish kinetics effect for inorganic non-metallic glass. In the following sections, several examples about the entropy-structure-property relation in various glass systems are highlighted.
4.1. Mechanical properties
As is well known, entropic elasticity is the typical property of rubber above its glass transition temperature, Tg, since rubber is composed of crosslinked carbon chains. Under tension, the orientation of carbon chain (-C-C-) results in the structural anisotropy as well as the decrease of entropy of the system: Sloading < Sorigin, which are the entropy under tension and in original state, respectively. After unloading, according to the second law of thermodynamics, the system should spontaneously evolve to the higher entropy state, and thus the oriented chains would shrink through micro-Brownian motion process. The crosslinking agent with the disulfide bonds that increases the inter-chain force can effectively suppress the macro-Brownian motion of the chains, thus allowing the chains to “memorize” the original position and finally the chains can recover to the initial state. This intriguing entropy-dominated process inspires us to propose a new question. That is, is it possible to gift rigid glass with entropic elasticity via entropy engineering? Based on the above analysis, the glass with structure like that of rubber, such as the metaphosphate glass that is composed of long P-O-P chains and alkali metal species as crosslink agent, might be a potential candidate for examining the entropy effect. Unfortunately, the entropic elasticity has never been observed in a simple glass composition e.g., the metaphosphate glass, 50Li2O-50P2O5 (mol%) [79].
In recent years, Hosono et al. proposed that entropic elasticity cannot be generated in the metaphosphate glass with single alkali metal ions [80]. Keeping this key point in mind, they tried to incorporate various types of alkali metal ions (Li, Na, K and Cs) into metaphosphate glass system to tune the entropy. They fabricated and studied four glass compositions (mol%): 50Li2O-50P2O5, 25Li2O-25Na2O-50P2O5, 16.6Li2O-16.6Na2O-16.6K2O-50P2O5 and 12.5Li2O-12.5Na2O-12.5K2O-12.5Cs2O-50P2O5, which have different entropy values. It was found that at the temperature above Tg the elastic shrinkage of the metaphosphate glasses were strongly composition dependent. Diversification of the components might help achieve higher ΔSmix glass systems with increased shrinkage. The underlying physical mechanism can be explained as follows. The increase in the types of alkali ions might potentially enhances ΔSmix, thus generating distinct inter-chain force. On one hand, the alkali metal ions with low field strength reduce inter-chain interaction, thus facilitating the micro-Brownian motion and the shrinkage of the stretched chains. On the other hand, alkali metal ions with high bond strength act as crosslinks among the chains. They can lock the relative position of the chains, thereby suppressing the macro-Brownian motion and allowing the chains to recover to their original states (Fig. 3a). Guided by this law, a high entropy glass system with the composition of 12.5Li2O-12.5Na2O-12.5K2O-12.5Cs2O-50P2O5 was developed, and it exhibited the highest degree of entropic elasticity. This system features considerably long P-O-P chains and the best chain flexibility (Fig. 3b). Remarkably, the unprecedented properties such as extremely large elastic shrinkage (> 40%), notable anisotropy and non-Newtonian flow after loading (Fig. 3c), high strength (> 1400 MPa), and improved Young's modulus (∼148 GPa) (Fig. 3d) can be realized in metaphosphate glass fibers [80], [81], [82]. The above-mentioned results indicate that entropy engineering is an effective approach to tune the mechanical properties such as the entropic elasticity of glass and can even help to develop new highly elastic glasses.
Fig. 3.
Entropy engineering for control of mechanical properties of glass [80,81]. (a) The model structure of multicomponent entropic elastic metaphosphate glass. (b) Structure features of the metaphosphate glass. Left: 31P MAS NMR (top graph) and Raman spectra (bottom graph) of metaphosphate glass with different ΔSmix values. Right: Intermolecular energies of organic polymers and metaphosphate glass (top graph) and SAXS profiles for metaphosphate glass (bottom graph). (c) Upper panel: Polarization images of high entropic metaphosphate glass fiber before (left graph) and after (right graph) relaxation at Tg. Lower panel: Shrinkage of the high entropic metaphosphate glass (left graph) and composition dependence of entropic shrinkage of metaphosphate glasses. (d) Strength (Upper graph) and Young's modulus (Lower graph) of high entropic metaphosphate glass fiber.
4.2. Electrical properties
The electrical properties such as electrical conductivity (opposite to resistivity) and dielectric loss of the material are strongly dependent on the mobility of charge carriers. For dielectric inorganic non-metallic glasses, the charge carriers are typically associated with relatively weakly bonded species, typically the monovalent alkali metal ions. The factors influencing the mobility of alkali ions may govern the electrical properties of such glasses.
Naturally, large ions are less mobile and thus exhibit lower electrical conductivity and dielectric loss compared to small ions. However, single alkali-containing glass systems can only display a limited tunable range of electrical conductivity and dielectric loss. In 1969, Isard et al. found that the mixed alkali effect, which was frequently observed in glass systems with relatively high ΔSmix, can be employed to effectively tune the electrical properties of the inorganic non-metallic glasses [83]. Interestingly, a gradual substitution of one type of alkali ion for other leads to a notable change of the electrical properties but in a nonlinear manner such that the overall ionic conductivity exhibits a pronounced minimum at approximately equimolar mixed alkali composition. Radiotracer studies show that the diffusivity of an alkali ion monotonically decreases as it is replaced by another alkali ion [84]. Taking 33.3R2O-66.6SiO2 (mol%) glass system with R = (Na, K) as an example, the electrical conductivity σdc of the mixed system 8.33Na2O-24.98K2O-66.6SiO2 (mol%) is superior to that of the subsystems, being ranked as 8.33Na2O-24.98K2O-66.6SiO2 < 33.3K2O-66.6SiO2 < 33.3Na2O-66.6SiO2 [83,85]. Significantly, this phenomenon has been demonstrated universally in a wide range of glass system such as R2O-P2O5 [86] and R2O-B2O3 [87], [88], [89] (Fig. 4a).
Fig. 4.
Entropy engineering for control of electrical properties of glass. (a) Electrical conductivity (σdc) or electrical resistivity (ρ) as a function of alkali metal ion substitution ratio in silicate glass (left graph) [83]; phosphate glass (middle graph) [86]; and borate glass (right graph) [89]. (b) MD simulation on the cavity volume for the glass system of (mol%)22.7(xK2O-(1-x)Na2O)−77.3SiO2 reported by Y. Onodera et al [93].. Upper panel: Visualization of cavities in alkali silicate glass with x = 0 (left graph), 0.5 (middle graph) and 1.0 (right graph). Lower panel: Distribution of the cavities volume in alkali silicate glass with x = 0 (left graph), 0.5 (middle graph) and 1.0 (right graph). (c) MD simulation on the conduction pathway for alkali ions in (mol%)50(xLi2O-(1-x)Rb2O)−50P2O5 glass system [94]. Upper panel: Conduction pathway for Li+ ions (blue) and Rb+ ions (red) with x = 0 (left graph), 0.25 (middle graph) and 0.5 (right graph). Lower panel: Conduction pathway for Li+ ions (blue) and Rb+ ions (red) with x= 0.75 (left graph) and 1.0 (middle graph); Blocked pathway (blue) and conduction pathway (pink) of Li+ in (mol%)25Li2O-25Rb2O-50P2O5 glass system (right graph).
The atomistic mechanism of the observed phenomenon has been studied through structural characterizations and simulation, including neutron and X-ray diffractions, reverse Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulation [90], [91], [92], [93], [94]. It has been found that mixing of various types of alkali ions not only modifies the topological structure of glass matrix, but also changes the interaction among various alkali metal ions. The reverse Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations show that alkali metal ions are distributed in the “channels” of structural network, i.e., alkali metal ions can only migrate through extremely narrow pathway. Mixed-alkali system exhibits smaller maximum cavity size compared with that in the single alkali system. As a result, the movement of the large alkali metal ion would be significantly suppressed by the narrow channel of the high entropy mixed alkali system, which is named as the bottleneck effect [93] (Fig. 4b). The notable energy mismatch among different alkali metal ion sites and the low dimensionality of the migration pathway cooperatively reduces the ionic jumping probability. Thus, the migration pathways of small alkali metal ions would be partially blocked by the larger ones [94] (Fig. 4c). These factors can be discerned directly by measuring the diffusion of a third alkali ion (Rb) as trace impurity in a binary mixed alkali (Na-Cs trisilicate) glass series [95]. These two factors (i.e., the bottleneck effect and the reduced ionic jumping probability) contribute to the decrease of electrical conductibility and dielectric loss in the mixed alkali oxide glasses. The above-mentioned mechanism can also be defined as “sluggish kinetics”, which has been widely recognized as a prominent effect in high entropy alloys and ceramics. Further, pairing of alkali ions is considered important for the migration of alkali ions, and pairing of unlike ions would be preferred from the perspective of entropy of mixing. Thus, it is expected that the entropy engineered glass system such as the triple or quadruple mixed alkali glass systems may display superior electrical properties.
4.3. Chemical durability
There are several factors, such as the compactness of glass network and mobility of the network modifier cations, which may affect the chemical durability of inorganic non-metallic glasses. In addition to the electrical properties, the chemical durability of inorganic non-metallic glasses is also associated with the mixed alkali effect, which can reduce the mobility of alkali ions. For example, the hydrolysis of alkali-containing oxide glasses mainly results from the ion exchange between protons from the environment and alkali metal ions from glass. Thus, the chemical durability, especially hydrolytic resistance of oxide glasses is related to the mobility of the alkali metal ions. Like the sluggish kinetics effect of high entropy ceramics and alloys, the mixed alkali systems should exhibit lower mobility of alkali metal ions, and thus an improved chemical durability can be expected [96] (Fig. 5a, b). This improvement has been confirmed by a series of experiments [85, [97], [98], [99]] (Fig. 5c). Therefore, it can be anticipated that the entropy engineering via diversification of the alkali ions can be employed to engineer the chemical durability of the mixed alkali inorganic non-metallic glasses, pointing to various promising applications such as hydrolytic resistant bioactive glasses, protection cover, and on-chip chemical reactor [100].
Fig. 5.
Entropy engineering for control of chemical durability of glass. (a) Topological structures of Li2O-SiO2 glass and Li2O-K2O-SiO2 glass [96]. (b) Schematic illustration of hydrolysis of single and mixed alkali silicate glass. (c) Composition dependent alkali metal ions exchanged quantity for (mol%)17(xK2O-(1-x)Na2O)−10CaO-73SiO2 (red) and (mol%)16(xK2O-(1-x)Na2O)−10CaO-74SiO2 (blue). The glass samples are immersed in HCl solutions [85].
4.4. Optical properties
The optical properties of glass are crucial for various applications such as optical imaging, optical communication, and laser. Glass bulk and fibers can be activated with rare-earth or transition-metal or main-group ions via incorporation of active dopants into glass matrix. In this case, the optical properties are governed by both the chemical state and the chemical environment of dopants. It is necessary to note that diversification of component elements of the system also affects the chemical state and their chemical environment of dopants, thus resulting in diverse optical properties of inorganic non-metallic glasses [101], [102], [103]. The approach of components diversification, frequently employed in entropy engineering, to enhance the optical performances of inorganic non-metallic glasses, can be described through the following two considerations.
4.4.1. Tuning the aggregation process of dopants
Modifying Sconf through multicomponent diversification can help adjust the aggregation process of the atoms or ions by so-called entropy-stabilized effect for alloys and ceramics. Like that of the alloys and ceramics, the strategy might be also suitable for tuning the aggregation of dopants in inorganic non-metallic glasses. To illustrate, consider the development of high average power laser glasses doped with various rare-earth active dopants as a typical example. In 1986, Arai first studied the clustering of Nd3+ dopants in pure silica glass that is composed of [SiO4] structural units. It was found that Nd3+ dopants cannot be well incorporated into the rigid [SiO4] network, leading to the unwanted dopant aggregation and phase separation, and hence, the extremely poor lasing performance [104]. Furthermore, diversifying the composition with Al2O3 and P2O5 allows to effectively prevent the unexpected Nd3+ aggregation, and thereby to improve the luminescent properties [102,103]. Monteil et al [105]. found that co-doping with Al may lead to a change of the local distribution of Eu3+ dopants (Fig. 6a). Funabiki et al [106]. proposed that the co-doped P and Al played two different roles. The role of P is associated with the formation of a unique solvation shell, while the role of Al is directly related to the entropy driven suppression of phase-separation (Fig. 6a). The exact roles of P and Al are still not fully clarified. Nevertheless, some possible explanations can be given as follows. The addition of Al2O3 and P2O5 would not only increase the number of the components, but also diversify the microstructures. Especially, various types of structural units including [AlO4], [AlO6], [PO4] and [PO5] are presented in the structural network, and therefore the Sconf (ΔSmix > 0) of the system could be higher than that of the system with fewer structural units. Consequently, the relative high entropy prevents the clustering of rare-earth dopants and thereby improve the optical performance of the glass, which is similar to the entropy-stabilized effect in alloys and ceramics. In addition to rare-earth metal dopants, main-group (e,g., Bi) [107] and noble metal dopants (e.g., Au and Ag) were also frequently employed in active photonics [108]. Interestingly, various kinds of the aggregation centers, such as Bi+, Bi53+, Bi nanoparticles, and Ag+, Ag2+, Ag nanoparticles can be stabilized in multicomponent glass systems (Fig. 6b). In a striking case, the chemical states of various dopants can be precisely tuned by changing the topological structure of glass, leading to intriguing tunable and ultra-broadband luminescence (Fig. 6b). Although the detailed tuning mechanism still needs to be revealed, it is supposed that the entropy evolution of the systems would be a contributing factor.
Fig. 6.
Entropy engineering for control of optical properties of glass. (a) MD simulation and schematic illustration of the entopic control to avoid the aggregation of rare-earth dopants in glass matrix [105]. (b) Topological engineering for tuning the chemical state of main group dopants in glass. Left: MD simulation and schematic illustration on the topological structure dependent chemical state of dopant in distinct multicomponent glass system, with O atoms colored yellow, B atoms colored black, Si atoms colored pink, Al colored green, Bi colored blue, alkaline-earth atoms colored red. Right: The topological structure dependent near-infrared luminescence change from bismuth dopant [107]. (c) Left: The local structures of various [TeOn] polyhedrons. Middle: Raman spectrum of a typical multicomponent tellurite glass [109]. Right: Comparision of the near-infrared luminescence of Er3+ dopant in various multicomponent glass systems with that in silica glass [110].
4.4.2. Adjusting chemical environment around the dopants
Entropy engineering strategy also enables the adjustment of the local chemical environment around the dopants. As analyzed above, high entropy systems possess extremely rich local configurations, and this is highly favorable for inhomogeneous broadening. This may lead to the extension or shift of the optical spectrum of the glass, which has strong impact on optical performances, such as broadband optical amplification, tunable lasing and ultra-short pulse generation. The contribution of multiple configurations to the inhomogeneous broadening can be supported by experimental evidence. One typical example is the spectral broadening of Er3+-doped multicomponent tellurite glass (10Na2O-10ZnO-80TeO2 in mol%) [109,110]. The structural analysis indicates that Te-O can form various unique configuration units such as [TeO4], [TeO3] and [TeO3+1] in glass systems (Fig. 6c). Thus, the tellurite glass system can be considered as a typical high entropy system. As a result, broadband emission from Er3+ dopant with the bandwidth of more than ∼50 nm can be observed in this system. This is in strong contrast to the case of Er3+-doped silica glass which only exhibits narrow emission with the bandwidth of ∼8 nm (Fig. 6c). Another effective way to diversify the configurations of the system for inhomogeneous broadening is the direct diversification of glass network formers [111], [112], [113], [114], [115]. For example, the Bi-doped hybrid germanium silicate glass (79.5GeO2–17SiO2–3Al2O3 in mol%) exhibits broadband and flat emission feature compared with the pure germinate glass system (96.5GeO2–3Al2O3 in mol%). The Er-doped hybrid glass fiber shows broader optical amplification compared with the silica fiber, and even supports laser operation beyond 1630 nm [116]. In addition, in the Ni2+-doped system with ternary network formers (25.53Li2O-21.53Ta2O5–35.29SiO2–17.65Al2O3 in mol%), unusual inhomogeneous broadening with flat emission (∼480 nm) has been observed after nanocrystallization [117]. To clarify the origin of this phenomenon, Zhou et al. employed high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy to explore the microstructure of the above glass. They directly observed the mesoscale chemical heterogeneities, which were similar to the pronounced composition fluctuations in high entropy alloy composed of CrFeCoNiPd [118]. They argued that this heterogeneity could genetically dominate the spectral features of the glass. These results imply opportunity and feasibility to develop the next-generation broadband photonic devices with significant applications in high-capacity telecommunication, remote sensing and defense.
5. Summary and outlook
The entropy engineering is an effective way not only for tuning the glass forming ability, but also for controlling the mechanical, electrical as well as optical properties of inorganic non-metallic glasses. Thus, this new strategy can be valuable for developing novel functional inorganic non-metallic glass materials. However, there remain challenges as well as opportunities for applying the entropy engineering concept in developing advanced functional inorganic non-metallic glasses. We have pointed out four potential research directions related to entropy engineering.
5.1. Entropy calculation for inorganic non-metallic glass
Sconf can be calculated based on local configuration statistics and thermal measurement, which are used for both the Boltzmann entropy and the Clausius entropy, respectively. The Boltzmann entropy calculation is usually limited to alloy and ceramic materials, and is not suitable for inorganic non-metallic glasses owing to their complex local structure. MD simulation can provide valuable information on the Boltzmann entropy calculation. For example, MD simulation has been recently conducted in reconstructing microstructures of inorganic non-metallic glasses, and the local configuration statistics can be potentially achieved. Despite some progress, there is still plenty of room for this strategy to be implemented. The main challenge for MD into quantify the Boltzmann entropy is to reveal the exact structures of inorganic non-metallic glass, since the non-crystalline solids are rather complicated, and the theoretical simulation can be time-consuming. In any case, the Clausius entropy calculation based on experimental thermal analysis for inorganic non-metallic glasses can be performed to verify and modify the Boltzmann entropy obtained via MD calculations. The challenge for the Clausius entropy calculation is associated with the lack of thermodynamic data, especially the heat capacities of glass, super-cooled liquid, and equilibrium liquid at various temperatures. Thus, precise entropy calculation for inorganic non-metallic glasses is strongly dependent on the future development of computational materials science and the expansion of thermodynamic database.
5.2. Investigation of the influence of entropy on glass stability
Understanding the influence of entropy and enthalpy on glass stability, such as the glass formation, phase separation, clustering behavior and homogeneity is critical for glass design based on the entropy engineering strategy. Unfortunately, the existing models are insufficient for quantitatively describing these effects. A combined method based on both the MD and the first-principle simulation may be useful for exploring the relation between local structure and entropy at given temperatures, leading to the establishment of a precise model. This model should enable the redefinition of the contribution of entropy in both thermodynamics and kinetics processes for glass stability and give a better understanding of the separated influence of entropy and enthalpy on glass stability. Once this type of model is created, the giant expansion of the database of high entropy glass system can be expected.
5.3. New techniques for tuning entropy of inorganic non-metallic glasses
Developing high configurational entropy materials relies on the available methods to increase the entropy of the system. The classic way is the rational diversification of the component elements. In addition, as a unique feature in glass, cooling process plays a critical role in freezing various configurations of the structural units (ΔS′conf design). It can be expected that faster cooling rate potentially allows obtaining higher Sconf (ΔS′conf > 0). Thus, a rational control of cooling rate is supposed to be an effective approach for adjusting Sconf in glass. It is believed that development of new fabrication techniques would be a promising way to raise Sconf of inorganic non-metallic glasses.
5.4. Development of advanced inorganic non-metallic glasses based on entropy engineering strategy
Entropy engineering is expected to enable the rational and efficient development of advanced functional inorganic non-metallic glasses. The current progress is mainly limited to the multicomponent oxide glasses, and it is critically important to expand the category of the glass systems. More specifically, the entropy-property relation in other special glass systems such as fluorite, chalcogenide and hybrid glasses should be explored. It can be envisioned that a series of advanced inorganic non-metallic glasses with greatly enhanced mechanical, electrical, chemical, and optical properties can be developed by utilizing the entropy engineering strategy. These entropy-engineered glass materials are supposed to be the next-generation candidates for various fundamental applications. Entropy engineering for inorganic non-metallic glasses has just been in infancy and needs to be intensively tested for a large range of inorganic non-metallic glass systems. At this initial stage it would appear prudent, it is significant to begin the research from the low entropy systems with simple composition and then expand it to the complex higher entropy candidates.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in this work.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2020YFB1805901), the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (Grant No. 62125502), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51972113), the Key Program of Guangzhou Scientific Research Special Project (Grant No. 201904020013), the Key Research and Development Program of Guangzhou (Grant No. 202007020003), the Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2021A0505030004), the Local Innovative and Research Teams Project of Guangdong Pearl River Talents Program (Grant No. 2017BT01 × 137), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University.
Biographies

Xu Feng received the BS degree from South China University of Technology, Guangdong, China, in 2018. He is currently working toward the Doctor's degree at South China University of Technology, Guangdong, China. His-current research interests focus on functional multi-component glass.

Shifeng Zhou received his PhD degree from Zhejiang University in 2008. From 2008 to 2009, he was with Hokkaido University as a postdoctoral researcher and then moved to Kyoto University as a JSPS postdoctoral fellow from 2009 to 2011. From 2011 to 2013, he was an associate professor at Zhejiang University. In 2013, he became a full professor at South China University of Technology. He is the recipient of the Gottardi Award of the International Commission on Glass and the Motoharu Kurata Award of the Ceramic Society of Japan. His-primary research area is photonic materials and devices.
References
- 1.Yeh J.W., S.K.Chen S.J.Lin, et al. Nanostructured high-entropy alloys with multiple principal enements: novel alloy design concepts and outcomes. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2004;6:299. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cantor B., Chang I.T.H., Knight P., et al. Microstructural development in equiatomic multicomponent alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2004;375–377:213. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chen M.R., Lin S.J., Yeh J.W., et al. Microstructure and properties of Al0.5CoCrCuFeNiTix(x=0-2.0) high-entropy alloys. Mater. Trans. 2006;47 [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kao Y.F., Chen T.J., Chen S.K., et al. Microstructure and mechanical property of as-cast, -homogenized, and -deformed AlxCoCrFeNi(0≤x≤2) high-entropy alloys. J. Alloy. Compd. 2009;488:57. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ng C., Guo S., Luan J., et al. Phase stability and tensile properties of Co-free Al0.5CrCuFeNi2 high-entropy alloy. J. Alloy. Compd. 2014;584:530. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wu Z., Bei H., Otto F., et al. Recovery, recrystallization, grain growth and phase stability of a family of FCC-structured multi-component equiatomic solid solution alloys. Intermetallics. 2014;46:131. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen M.R., Lin S.J., Yeh J.W., et al. Effect of vanadium addition on the microstructure, hardness, and wear resistance of Al0.5CoCrCuFeNi high-entropy alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. 2006;37:1363. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Guo S., Ng C., Liu C.T. Anomalous solidification microstructures in Co-free AlxCrCuFeNi2 high-entropy alloys. J. Alloy Compd. 2013;557:77. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Senkov O.N., Wilks G.B., Scott J.M., et al. Mechanical properties of Nb25Mo25Ta25W25 and V20Nb20Mo20Ta20W20 refractory high entropy alloys. Intermetallics. 2011;19:698. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Senkov O.N., Wilks G.B., Miracle D.B., et al. Refractory high-entropy alloys. Intermetallics. 2010;18:1758. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yang X., Zhang Y., Liaw P.K. Microstructure and compressive properties of NbTiVTaAlx high entropy alloys. Proc. Eng. 2012;36:292. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Youssef K.M., Zaddah A.J., Niu C., et al. A novel low-density, high-hardness, high-entropy alloy with close-packed single-phase nanocrystalline structures. Mater. Res. Lett. 2015;3:95. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Takeuchi A., Amiya K., Wada T., et al. High-entropy alloys with a hexagonal close-packed structure designed by equi-atomic alloy strategy and binary phase diagrams. JOM. 2014;66:1984. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Feuerbacher M., Heidelmann M., Thomas C. Hexagonal high-entropy alloys. Mater. Res. Lett. 2015;3:1. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ye Y.F., Wang Q., Lu J., et al. High-entropy alloy: challenges and prospects. Mater. Today. 2016;19:349. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wei R., Tao J., Sun H., et al. Soft magnetic Fe26.7Co26.7Ni26.6Si9B11 high entropy metallic glass with good bending ductility. Mater. Lett. 2017;197:87. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tong Y., Qiao J.C., Zhang C., et al. Mechanical properties of Ti16.7Zr16.7Hf16.7Cu16.7Ni16.7Be16.7 high-entropy bulk metallic glass. J. Non-cryst. Solids. 2016;452:57. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang X.Y., Dai W.L., Zhang M., et al. Thermoplastic micro-formability of TiZrHfNiCuBe high entropy metallic glass. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2018;34:40. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ding H.Y., Yao K.F. High entropy Ti20Zr20Cu20Ni20Be20 bulk metallic glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2013;364:9. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ding H.Y., Shao Y., Gong P., et al. A senary TiZrHfCuNiBe high entropy bulk metallic glass with large glass-forming ability. Mater. Lett. 2014;125:151. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gao X.Z., Lu Y.P., Zhang B., et al. Microstructural origins of high strength and high ductility in an AlCoCrFeNi2.1 eutectic high-entropy alloy. Acta Mater. 2017;141:59. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lee C.P., Chen Y.Y., Hsu C.Y., et al. The effect of boron on the corrosion resistance of the high entropy alloys Al0.5CoCrCuFeNiBx. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2007;154:C424. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gludovatz B., Hohenwarter A., Catoor D., et al. A fracture-resistant high-entropy alloy for cryogenic applications. Science. 2014;345:1153. doi: 10.1126/science.1254581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang H., He Y.Z., Pan Y. Enhanced hardness and fracture toughness of the laser-solidified FeCoNiCrCuTiMoAlSiB0.5 high-entropy alloy by martensite strengthening. Scripta Mater. 2013;69:342. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li W.D., Liaw P.K., Gao Y.F., et al. Fracture resistance of high entropy alloys: a review. Intermetallics. 2018;99:69. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Oses C., Toher C., Curtarolo S. High-entropy ceramics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020;5:295. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rost C.M., Sachet E., Borman T., et al. Entropy-stabilized oxides. Nat. Commun. 2005;6:8485. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mao A.Q., Xiang H.Z., Zhang Z.G., et al. Solution combustion synthesis and magnetic property of rock-salt (Co0.2Cu0.2Mg0.2Ni0.2Zn0.2)O high-entropy oxide nanocrystalline powder. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019;484:245. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dąbrowa J., Stygar M., Mikuła A., et al. Synthesis and microstructure of the (Co,Cr,Fe,Mn,Ni)3O4 high entropy oxide characterized by spinel structure. Mater. Lett. 2018;216:32. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tseng K.P., Yang Q., McCormack S.J., et al. High-entropy, phase-constrained, lanthanide sesquioxide. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019;103:569. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mao A.Q., Xiang H.Z., Zhang Z.G., et al. A new class of spinel high-entropy oxides with controllable magnetic properties. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2020;497 [Google Scholar]
- 32.Castle E., Csanádi T., Grasso S., et al. Processing and properties of high-entropy ultra-high temperature carbides. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:8609. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26827-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sarker P., Harrington T., Toher C., et al. High-entropy high-hardness metal carbides discovered by entropy descriptors. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:4980. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07160-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ye B.L., Wen T.Q., Wang K.H., et al. First-principles study, fabrication, and characterization of (Hf0.2Zr0.2Ta0.2Nb0.2Ti0.2)C high-entropy ceramic. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019;102:4344. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Harrington T.J., Gild J., Sarker P., et al. Phase stability and mechanical properties of novel high entropy transition metal carbides. Acta Mater. 2019;166:271. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liu D., Liu H.H., Ning S.S., et al. Synthesis of high-purity high-entropy metal diboride powders by boro/carbothermal reduction. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019;102:7071. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mayrhofer P.H., Kirnbauer A., Ertelthaler Ph., et al. High-entropy ceramic thin films; a case study on transition metal diborides. Scripta Mater. 2018;149:93. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gild J., Zhang Y.Y., Harrington T., et al. High-entropy metal diborides: a new class of high-entropy materials and a new type of ultrahigh temperature ceramics. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:37946. doi: 10.1038/srep37946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Liu D., Wen T.Q., Ye B.L., et al. Synthesis of superfine high-entropy metal diboride powders. Scripta Mater. 2019;167:110. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gild J., Braun J., Kaufmann K., et al. A high-entropy silicide: (Mo0.2Nb0.2Ta0.2Ti0.2W0.2)Si2. J. Materiomics. 2019;5:337. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Qin Y., Liu J.X., Li F., et al. A high entropy silicide by reactive spark plasma sintering. J. Adv. Ceram. 2019;8:148. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhang Y., Guo W.M., Jiang Z.B., Zhu Q.Q., et al. Dense high-entropy boride ceramics with ultra-high hardness. Scripta Mater. 2019;164:135. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Malinovskis P., Fritze S., Riekehr L., et al. Synthesis and characterization of multicomponent (CrNbTaTiW)C films for increased hardness and corrosion resistance. Mater. Design. 2018;149:59. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dinu M., Pana I., Braic V., et al. In vitro corrosion resistance of Si containing multi-principal element carbide coatings. Mater. Corros. 2016;67:908. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yan X.L., Constantin L., Lu Y.F., et al. (Hf0.2Zr0.2Ta0.2Nb0.2Ti0.2)C high-Entropy ceramics with low thermal conductivity. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2018;101:4486. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhao Z.F., Xiang H.M., Dai F.Z., et al. (La0.2Ce0.2Nd0.2Sm0.2Eu0.2)2Zr2O7: a novel high-entropy ceramic with low thermal conductivity and sluggish grain growth rate. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2019;35:2647. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Moesgaard M., Keding R., Skibsted J., et al. Evidence of intermediate-range order heterogeneity in calcium aluminosilicate glasses. Chem. Mater. 2010;22:4471. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yue Y.Z. The iso-structural viscosity, configurational entropy and fragility of oxide liquids. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2009;355:737. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mauro J.C., Yue Y.Z., Ellison A.J., et al. Viscosity of glass-forming liquids. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:19780. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911705106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Johari G.P., et al. Decrease in the configurational and vibrational entropies on supercooling a liquid and their relations with the excess entropy. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2002;307:387. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wen T.Q., Liu H.H., Ye B.L., et al. High-entropy alumino-silicides: a novel class of high-entropy ceramics. Sci. China Mater. 2020;63:300. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zheng Q.J., Zhang Y.F., Montazerian M., et al. Understanding glass through differential scanning calorimetry. Chem. Rev. 2020;119:7874. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Takada A., Conradt R., Richet P. Residual entropy and structural disorder in glass: a two-level model and a review of spatial and ensemble vs. temporal sampling. J. Non-cryst. Solids. 2013;360:13. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Conradt R. Chemical structure, medium range order, and crystalline reference state of multicomponent oxide liquids and glasses. J. Non-cryst. Solids. 2004;345–346:16. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Fotheringham U., Baltes A., Müller R., et al. The residual configurational entropy below the glass transition: determination for two commercial optical glasses. J. Non-cryst. Solids. 2009;355:642. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Takada A., Conradt R., Richet P. Residual entropy and structural disorder in glass: a review of history and an attempt to resolve two apparently conflicting views. J. Non-cryst. Solids. 2015;429:33. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Richet P. Viscosity and configurational entropy of silicate melts. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac. 1983;48:471. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Richet P., Robie R.A., Hemingway B.S., et al. Entropy and structure of silicate glasses and melts. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac. 1992;57:2751. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Speedy B.J. The entropy of a glass. Mol. Phys. 1993;80:1105. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Adam G., Gibbs J.H. On the temperature dependence of cooperative relaxation properties in glass-forming liquids. J. Chem. Phys. 1965;43:139. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yue Y.Z., J.C.Christiansen S.L.Jesen. Determination of the fictive temperature for a hyperquenched glass. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002;357:20. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hornbøll L., Yue Y.Z., et al. Enthalpy relaxation in hyperquenched glasses of different fragility. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2007;354:1862. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zhang Y.F., Hu L.N., Liu S.J., et al. Sub-Tg enthalpy relaxation in an extremely unstable oxide glass and its implication for structural heterogeneity. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2013;381:23. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhang J.R., Zhang X.Y., Li Y., et al. High-entropy oxides 10La2O3-20TiO2-10Nb2O5-20WO3-20ZrO2 amorphous spheres prepared by containerless solidification. Mater. Lett. 2019;244:167. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sarkar A., Djenadic R., Wang D., et al. Rare earth and transition metal based entropy stabilised perovskite type oxides. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2018;38:2318. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Liu X.F., Zhou J.J., Zhou S.F., et al. Transparent glass-ceramics functionalized by dispersed crystals. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018;97:38. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Meyer K. Dt Verlag für Grundstoffindustrie; Leipzig: 1968. Physikalisch–Chemische Kristallographie. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kingery W.D., et al. John Wiley &Sons; New York: 1976. Uhlmann DR. Introduction to Ceramics. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Li R.X., Zhang Y. Entropy and glass formation. Acta Phys. Sin. 2017;66 [Google Scholar]
- 70.Greer A.L. Confusion by design. Nature. 1993;366:303. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Lin H., Jiang S.B., Wu J.F., et al. Er3+ doped Na2O–Nb2O5–TeO2 glasses for optical waveguide laser and amplifier. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2003;36:812. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hart R.T., Zwanziger J.W., Lee P.L. The crystalline phase of (K2O)15(Nb2O5)15(TeO2)70 glass ceramic is a polymorph of K2Te4O9. J. Non-cryst. Solids. 2004;337:48. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Blanchandin S., Thomas P., Marchet P., et al. New heavy metal oxide glasses: investigations within the TeO2–Nb2O5–Bi2O3 system. J. Alloy. Compd. 2002;347:206. [Google Scholar]
- 74.Kjeldsen J., Rodrigues A.C., Mossin S., et al. Critical V2O5/TeO2 ratio inducing abrupt property changes in vanadium tellurite glasses. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2014;118:14942. doi: 10.1021/jp508910m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Zhang Y.F., Wang P.X., Zheng T., et al. Enhancing Li-ion battery anode performances via disorder/order engineering. Nano Energy. 2018;49:596. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Soules T.F. A molecular dynamic calculation of the structure of B2O3 glass. J. Chern. Phys. 1980;73:4032. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Januchta K., To T., Bødker M.S., et al. Elasticity, hardness, and fracture toughness of sodium aluminoborosilicate glasses. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019;102:4520. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Soppe W., van der Marel C., van Gunsteren W.F., et al. New insights into the structure of B2O3 glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 1988;103:201. [Google Scholar]
- 79.Brow R.K. Review: the structure of simple phosphate glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2000;263–264:1. [Google Scholar]
- 80.Inaba S., Hosono H., Ito S. Entropic shrinkage of an oxide glass. Nat. Mater. 2015;14:312. doi: 10.1038/nmat4151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Endo J., Inaba S., Ito S. Mechanical properties of anisotropic metaphosphate glass. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2015;98:2767. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Braun M., Yue Y.Z., Rüssel C., Jäger C. Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance evidence for structural orientation in extruded phosphote glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 1998;241:204. [Google Scholar]
- 83.Isard J.O. The mixed alkali effect in glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 1969;1:235. [Google Scholar]
- 84.Jain H., Peterson N.L., Dowing H.L. Tracer Diffusion and electrical conductivity in sodium-cesium silicate glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 1983;55:293. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Wu Z.F., Zhou N., Mao B., et al. Study of the mixed alkali effect on chemical durability of alkali silicate glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 1986;84:468. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Tsuchida J.E., Ferri F.A., Pizani P.S., et al. Ionic conductivity and mixed-ion effect in mixed alkali metaphosphate glasses. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017;19:6594. doi: 10.1039/c6cp07876a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Hameed A., Shareefuddin Md., Chary M.N. The mixed alkali effect in the MgO–Li2O–Na2O–K2O–B2O3 glass system. Phys. Chem. Glasses: Eur. J. Glass Sci. Technol. B. 2016;57:227. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Jain H., Downing H.L., Peterson N.L. The alkali effect in lithium-sodium borate glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 1984;64:335. [Google Scholar]
- 89.Li A., Wang M.T., Li M., Liu Z.G., et al. The effect of mixed alkali on structural changes and ionic migration characteristics in zinc borate glasses. Mater. Phys. Chem. 2018;217:519. [Google Scholar]
- 90.Wilkinson C.J., Potter A.R., Welch R.S., et al. Topological origins of the mixed alkali effect in glass. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2019;123:7482. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b06512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Habasaki J., León C., Ngai K.L. Springer; Cham: 2017. The Mixed Alkali Effect Examined By Molecular Dynamics simulations. in: Dynamics of glassy, Crystalline and Liquid Ionic Conductors; p. 459. [Google Scholar]
- 92.Yu Y.T., Wang M.Y., Smedskjaer M.M., Mauro J.C., et al. Thermometer effect: origin of the mixed alkali effect in glass relaxation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;119 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.095501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Onodera Y., Takimoto Y., Hijiya H., et al. Origin of the mixed alkali effect in silicate glass. NPG Asia Mater. 2019;11:75. [Google Scholar]
- 94.Swenson J., Adams S. Mixed alkali effect in glasses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003;90 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.155507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Jain H., Peterson N.L. Impurity alkali diffusion in sodium-cesium silicate glasses. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1983;66:174. [Google Scholar]
- 96.Baral K., Li A., Ching W.Y. Understanding the atomistic origin of hydration effects in single and mixed bulk alkali-silicate glasses. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019;102:207. [Google Scholar]
- 97.Sen S., Tolley F.V. Effect of Na2O/K2O ratio on chemical durability of alkali-lime-silica glasses. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1955;38:175. [Google Scholar]
- 98.Sun Y.Z., Su Y.A., He B.Y. Influence of the mixed alkali effect on the chemical durability of Na2O-TiO2-SiO2 glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 1986;80:335. [Google Scholar]
- 99.Rodrigues A., Fearn S., Vialarigues M. Mixed reactions: glass durability and the mixed-alkali effect. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019;102:7278. [Google Scholar]
- 100.Wang X.J., Fagerlund S., Massera J., et al. Do properties of bioactive glasses exhibit mixed alkali behavior. J. Mater. Sci. 2017;52:8986. [Google Scholar]
- 101.Afify N.D., Mountjoy G. Molecular-dynamics modeling of Eu3+-ion clustering in SiO2 glass. Phys. Rev. B. 2009;79 [Google Scholar]
- 102.Lægsgaard J. Dissolution of rare-earth clusters in SiO2 by Al codoping: a microscopic model. Phys. Rev. B. 2002;65 [Google Scholar]
- 103.Corrales L.R. Free energy profiles of Al3+ and La3+ cation distribution in silica and soda silicate glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2005;351:401. [Google Scholar]
- 104.Arai K., Namikawa H., Kumata K., et al. Aluminum or phosphorus co-doping effects on the fluorescence and structural properties of neodymium-doped silica glass. J. Appl. Phys. 1986;59:3430. [Google Scholar]
- 105.Monteil A., Chaussedent S., Alombert-Goget G., et al. Clustering of rare earth in glasses, aluminum effect: experiments and modeling. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2004;348:44. [Google Scholar]
- 106.Funabiki F., Kamiya T., Hosono H. Doping effects in amorphous oxides. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2012;120:447. [Google Scholar]
- 107.Zhou S.F., Guo Q.B., Inoue H., et al. Topological engineering of glass for modulating chemical state of dopants. Adv. Mater. 2014;26:7966. doi: 10.1002/adma.201403256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Simo A., Polte J., Pfänder N., et al. Formation mechanism of silver nanoparticles stabilized in glassy matrices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:18824. doi: 10.1021/ja309034n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Jha A., Shen S., Naftaly M. Structural origin of spectral broadening of 1.5-μm emission in Er3+ -doped tellurite glasses. Phys. Rev. B. 2000;62:6215. [Google Scholar]
- 110.Shen S.X., Jha A., Liu X.B., et al. Tellurite glasses for broadband amplifiers and integrated optics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2002;85:1391. [Google Scholar]
- 111.Zhou S.F., Dong H.F., Zeng H.P., et al. Broadband optical amplification in Bi-doped germanium silicate glass. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007;91 [Google Scholar]
- 112.Zhang N., Qiu J.R., Dong G.P., et al. Broadband tunable near-infrared emission of Bi-doped composite germanosilicate glasses. J. Mater. Chem. 2012;22:3154. [Google Scholar]
- 113.Zhou S.F., Li C.Y., Yang G., et al. Self-limited nanocrystallization-mediated activation of semiconductor nanocrystal in an amorphous solid. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013;23:5436. [Google Scholar]
- 114.Zhou S.F., Jiang N., Wu B.T., et al. Ligand-driven wavelength-tunable and ultra-broadband infrared luminescence in single-ion-doped transparent hybrid Materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009;19:2081. [Google Scholar]
- 115.Wen S.F., Wang Y.P., Lan B.J., et al. Pressureless crystallization of glass for transparent nanoceramics. Adv. Sci. 2019;6 doi: 10.1002/advs.201901096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Huang X.Y., Cheng H.H., Luo W., et al. Er-activated hybridized glass fiber for laser and sensor in the extended wavebands. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021 doi: 10.1002/adom.202101394. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Yu Y.Z., Fang Z.J., Ma C.S., et al. Mesoscale engineering of photonic glass for tunable luminescence. NPG Asia Mater. 2016;8:e318. [Google Scholar]
- 118.Ding Q.Q., Zhang Y., Chen X., et al. Tuning element distribution, structure and properties by composition in high-entropy alloys. Nature. 2019;574:223. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1617-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






