Abstract
Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (Type 2 DM) constitutes a major public health problem. Zinc (Zn), a critical micronutrient in the human body, serves as a potent antioxidant, and is closely linked to the development and progression of Type 2 DM. However, limited evidence explored the speculated putative mechanism of Zn repletion improving insulin sensitivity and severity in patients with Type 2 DM.
Methods: Adult participants (aged more than 18 years) diagnosed with Type 2 DM (with or without microvascular complications) were recruited. A case recording form divided into Section A, socio-demographics, and Section B, clinical parameters, a brief clinical history and lab investigations, were logged for each patient.
Results: Majority of patients (n=44, 47.8%) were over 60 years old, with a nearly equal distribution of sex (n=47, 51.1% male and n=45, 48.9% female). Sensory motor (n=50, 54.3%) and visual disturbances (n=48, 52.2%) were the most commonly reported symptoms. Oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHA) were the most common drug treatment (n=56, 60.9%, p<0.001). A considerable number of patients had systemic hypertension (n=55, 59.8%) and neuropathy was the most prevalent complication (n=68, 73.9%), followed by retinopathy (n=53, 57.6%). Zn deficiency was prevalent in n=50, 54.3% of patients and it showed significant associations with poor glycaemic control, diabetic neuropathy (<0.001), retinopathy (<0.001), and nephropathy (<0.001).
Conclusion: We highlighted the high prevalence of Zn deficiency among Type 2 DM patients and established significant correlations between low Zn levels (<65 μg/dL) and poor glycemic control, as well as higher incidences of neuropathy, retinopathy, and nephropathy. We advocate that Zn status should be considered in the management and treatment strategies for Type 2 DM patients to potentially mitigate complications and improve outcomes.
Keywords: diabetic microvascular complications, diabetic retinopathies, “insulin resistance”, types 2 diabetes mellitus (t2dm), zinc supplementation
Introduction
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (Type 2 DM), a chronic metabolic disease characterized by elevated levels of blood glucose/sugar alongside impaired carbohydrate, lipid, and protein (due to insufficient insulin secretion), constitutes a major public health problem [1]. Worldwide, it has a prevalence of approximately 422 million (mostly in low- and middle-income countries) and is responsible for 1.5 million deaths yearly [2]. Currently, 347 million adults worldwide have Type 2 DM; with its prevalence continuing to rise, it is expected to be the seventh leading cause of death by 2030 presumably due to population aging, growth, urbanization, low physical activity and the high prevalence of obesity [2]. In South-East Asia, Type 2 DM affected nearly 8.8% of adults in 2019, totalling 87.6 million people; notably, a significant number remain undiagnosed [3]. Specifically, India faces a burgeoning Type 2 DM epidemic harbouring 77 million diabetics aged 20-70 years primarily driven by rapid urbanization, sedentary lifestyles, unhealthy diet, and tobacco use [4,5]. Indeed, these staggering numbers underscore the urgent need for comprehensive healthcare strategies to address Type 2 DM, its potential complications and contributing factors.
Clinically, the early symptoms of untreated Type 2 DM are related to elevated blood sugar levels and extension of it into the urine. High amounts of glucose (>0.25mg/ml) in the urine can cause polyuria leading to dehydration which causes increased thirst and water consumption i.e. polydipsia [6]. At times, Type 2 DM patients may complain of fatigue, nausea and vomiting [6]. Other associated symptoms include weight loss and blurred vision. The long-term macrovascular and microvascular complications of Type 2 DM range from cerebrovascular accidents, peripheral arterial disease, and coronary heart disease to peripheral neuropathy, diabetic retinopathy, and nephropathy [7]. Chronically, diabetic retinopathy potentially results in loss of vision, nephropathy leading to renal failure, and peripheral neuropathy poses risk of foot ulcers, amputation and autoimmune neuropathy resulting in gastrointestinal, genitourinary and cardiovascular symptoms [2,6]. In Type 2 DM patients, one of the postulated pathophysiological mechanistic theories is chronic hyperglycaemia increases oxidative stress by the production of free radicals (oxidants), plus the reduction of the antioxidant defence system. This leads to oxidative cellular injury resulting in cellular dysfunctions [2,6].
Zinc (Zn), as a critical micronutrient in the human body, serves as a potent antioxidant that plays a significant role in mitigating oxidative stress. Its antioxidative action is crucial for maintaining cellular health and preventing the damage that oxidative stress can cause to cells and tissues. The lack of adequate Zn levels (<70 mcg/dL) is closely linked to the development and progression of chronic diseases, including Type 2 DM. In individuals with Type 2 DM, the concentration of Zn in the body can be adversely affected through mechanisms such as increased excretion and diminished absorption from the intestines, as well as enhanced renal excretion, which further exacerbates the body's Zn deficiency [7]. Its mechanism of action is multifaceted, particularly in its relationship with insulin, the hormone central to glucose metabolism. Potentially, Zn acts as a cofactor necessary for the synthesis, storage, and possibly the secretion of insulin from the pancreas. In the context of Type 2 DM, where insulin resistance is the predominant issue, Zn deficiency can potentially aggravate the condition, highlighting the mineral's importance in insulin function and glucose homeostasis [8]. Extensive molecular and cellular research underscores Zn's pivotal role not only in insulin synthesis/function but also in the broader metabolic processes affected by Type 2 DM. Observational studies have drawn correlations between lowered serum Zn levels and the presence of established Type 2 DM, suggesting a critical link between Zn status and diabetes management. Although rodent models of Type 2 DM have shown the beneficial impacts of Zn supplementation in moderating the disease's progression, the efficacy and safety of such supplementation in humans require further exploration through well-designed clinical trials [6,9,10]. Zn depletion has several potential clinical implications. It is speculated that Zn repletion could improve insulin sensitivity in patients with Type 2 DM and reduce the severity of certain complications of this disease.
As such, to understand the underlying patho-biochemical inter-relationships of the complications of Type 2 DM with Zn levels in more detail, this study is being undertaken with two distinct aims: (1) to assess the relationship between level of Zn and hyperglycaemia in Type 2 DM, and (2) To assess the relationship between level of Zn and microvascular complications of Type 2 DM such as diabetic neuropathy, diabetic retinopathy and diabetic nephropathy. Our hypothesis is that Zn supplementation is helpful in the prevention of Type 2 DM and its related complications, as stated above.
Materials and methods
Participants
Ninety-two (92) adult participants aged more than 18 years visiting the General Medicine out-patient department (OPD) and in-patient department (IPD) of the Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital, who have been diagnosed with Type 2 DM with or without microvascular complications like diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy and diabetic nephropathy were recruited. Criteria for the diagnosis of Type 2 DM include one of the following: (1) fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L) (Fasting is defined as no caloric intake for at least eight hours) or two-hour plasma glucose (PG) ≥200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (This test was performed as per the WHO guidelines, using a glucose load containing the equivalent of 75 grams of anhydrous glucose dissolved in water), (2) Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol), (3) in patients with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis, a random plasma glucose ≥200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L). Participants that include pregnant females, pre-diabetics or with Type 1 DM, those consuming multivitamins and/or health supplements such as anabolic steroids and/or ayurvedic/desi medicines, diagnosed with various enteropathies (e.g., acrodermatitis enteropathica) or malabsorptive disorders (e.g., celiac disease), malignancies, or on medications such as anti-tubercular treatment (ATT), oral contraceptive pills, valproate, penicillamine were excluded from the study. The washout period for participants taking supplements was six months per the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) guidelines. Specifically, patients suspected with Type 1 DM were tested for C-peptide levels; if found below 5 µU/mL (0.6 ng/mL) they were excluded (Type 1 diabetes).
Ethical approval
Institutional ethical approval from Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Jolly Grant, Dehradun, India, which conformed to the standards of the journal was granted prior to recruitment and testing and the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (REC Approval Code: SRHU/HIMS/RC/2024/238).
Experimental protocol
A case recording form divided into the following sections was used to collect the data: Section A: Socio-demographic details: Age of the patient, sex, marital status, pregnancy status of female subjects, familial status (joint family/unitary), educational status; Section B: Clinical parameters - a brief clinical history and lab investigations: comorbidities: hypertension, coronary artery disease, lab investigations: HBA1C levels using Boronated Affinity Lab Method, fasting blood sugar level, postprandial blood sugar level, serum Zn levels using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS) (Normal Reference Range: 65 - 256 microgram/dl), serum creatinine, serum K+, serum Na+, urine albumin, 24-hr urine protein, urine routine/microscopy, complete hemogram/erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)/C-reactive protein (CRP). All blood samples were collected in the morning fasted and were processed on the same day. Specifically for zinc, the ICPMS instrument used was an Agilent 7900 ICP-MS (Agilent Technologies, Tokyo, Japan) connected to an SPS 4 Autosampler (Agilent Technologies), and data was recorded using the Agilent MassHunter Data software. To ensure apt quality control, R2 value for zinc was 0.9865 or 98.65%, and the calibration or validation range was 2.5 to 1,000 μg/L. The socio-demographic data and clinical details of the patients were recorded in the study pro forma. Fundus examination, bilateral lower limb nerve conduction velocity (NCV) study, and urinary albumin/24 hours. Urine protein were checked in all patients to look for diabetic retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy respectively. Details of investigations including a complete blood count, fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, HBA1C level, ESR, CRP, NCV of bilateral lower limb, serum creatinine, serum sodium, serum potassium, urinary albumin and urine routine microscopy were recorded in the study pro forma.
Sample size calculation
The following sample size formula was used for calculating the adequate sample size: n = (Z1-α/2)2P(1−P)/d2, where n is the sample size, Z is the standard normal deviation at 2-sided 95% confidence level = 1.96, P is expected prevalence. The minimum detectable difference based on previous work of prevalence (P) of Zn deficiency in T2DM - 40% or 0.40. The precision (d) has been taken as 10% or 0.10. N = 1.96 x 1.96 x 0.40 (1-0.40) / (0.10*0.10) = 0.921/0.01 = 92, the approximate number of participants required is 92. Since it's based on the prevalence (P) of Zn deficiency in Type 2 DM, it supports our results/conclusion, at least based on our sampling frame population.
Statistical analysis
Data was collected and entered Office Excel version 2010 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and tabulated. SPSS software version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to analyze the data that has been tabulated. A Shapiro-Wilk test was performed to assess the distribution of normality. The end results were described in the form of frequency charts, percentages, and Mean ± SD. Differences in participants’ demographics were analysed using independent-sample t-tests. An association between the Zn levels, Type 2 DM, and complications of Type 2 DM were analysed using Chi (χ) square test and Fisher exact test. Specifically, the Chi (χ) square test was used to compare differences in categorical variables, and ANOVA was used to compare mean values of continuous variables between groups. A 'p' value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Demographic and general characteristics
In Table 1, the majority of the patients (SD: 4.3 years, n=44, 47.8%) were over 60 years old, followed by 46-60 years (SD: 5.8, n=40, 43.5%), and 31-45 years (SD: 3.4 years, n=8, 8.7%). There was a nearly equal distribution of gender among patients with n=47, 51.1% male and n=45, 48.9% female. Sensory motor disturbance (n=50, 54.3%) and visual disturbances (n=48, 52.2%) were the most commonly reported symptoms. Polyphagia was the least reported symptom (n=4, 4.3%). A significant portion of patients had a history of smoking (n=31, 35.9%) and alcohol intake (n=38, 41.3%). Most participants (n=82, 90%) belong to middle socio-economic status with BMI of 28.42 kg/m2 (SD ± 5.32).
Table 1. Demographic and general characteristics of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Demographic Characteristics | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
Age (years ± SD) | ||
18-30 (0) | 8 | 8.7 |
31-45 (3.4) | 40 | 43.5 |
46-60 5.8) | 44 | 47.8 |
>60 (4.3) | 92 | 100 |
Sex | ||
Male | 47 | 51.1 |
Female | 45 | 48.9 |
Symptoms | ||
Polyuria | 14 | 15.2 |
Polyphagia | 4 | 4.3 |
Polydipsia | 8 | 8.7 |
Oliguria | 22 | 23.9 |
Visual disturbances | 48 | 52.2 |
Sensory motor disturbance | 50 | 54.3 |
History of smoking | ||
Yes | 33 | 35.9 |
No | 59 | 64.1 |
History of alcohol Intake | ||
Yes | 38 | 41.3 |
No | 54 | 58.7 |
History of systemic hypertension | ||
Yes | 55 | 59.8 |
No | 37 | 40.2 |
Socioeconomic Status | ||
Low | 5 | 4.5 |
Middle | 82 | 91 |
High | 5 | 4.0 |
Clinical and biochemical profile of patients of type 2 DM
In Table 2, nearly half of the patients (n=46, 50%) had diabetes for five to 10 years, and 13 (14.1%) were newly diagnosed. Oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHA) were the most common treatment (n=56, 60.9%). Neuropathy was the most prevalent complication (n=68, 73.9%), followed by retinopathy (n=53, 57.6%).
Table 2. Clinical and biochemical profile of pateints of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Clinical and biochemical characteristics | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
Duration (Years) | ||
Newly Diagnosed | 13 | 14.1 |
<5 | 15 | 16.3 |
5 – 10 | 46 | 50.0 |
>10 | 18 | 19.6 |
Blood glucose lab measurements | ||
FBS (mg/dl) | 159.7 ± 52.7 | 90 – 332 |
PPBS (mg/dl) | 242.9 ± 96.3 | 118 – 571 |
HbA1C (%) | 9.2 ± 2.5 | 5.7 – 14.9 |
Complications | ||
Neuropathy | 68 | 73.9 |
Retinopathy | 53 | 57.6 |
Microalbuminuria | 49 | 53.2 |
Abnormal Renal Function | 37 | 40.2 |
Dyslipidemia | 42 | 45.7 |
History of Treatment | ||
No Treatment | 16 | 17.4 |
OHA | 56 | 60.9 |
Insulin | 10 | 10.9 |
OHA + Insulin | 10 | 10.9 |
Relationship between level of zinc and glycaemic control in type 2 DM and its complications
In Table 3, most patients (n=44, 88%) with Zn level <65 μg/dL had uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c > 7%). Zn deficiency (<65 μg/dL) showed significant associations with poor glycaemic control (p<0.001), diabetic neuropathy (p<0.001), retinopathy (p<0.001), and nephropathy (p<0.001). The majority of patients with neuropathy had axonal neuropathy (n=36, 85.7% and n=21, 80.8%). Patients with Zn deficiency (<65 μg/dL) exhibited higher rates of neuropathy, retinopathy and nephropathy, indicating a potential role of Zn in mitigating diabetic complications.
Table 3. Relationship between level of zinc and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications – diabetic neuropathy, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic nephropathy.
Zn level (μg/dL) | HbA1c Level (%) | P value | |
≤ 7%; n (%) | >7%; n (%) | ||
<65 | 6 (12) | 44 (88) | <0.001 |
≥65 | 19 (45.2) | 23 (54.8) | |
Diabetic Neuropathy | |||
Yes | No | ||
<65 | 42 (84) | 8 (16) | <0.001 |
≥65 | 26 (61.9) | 16 (38.1) | |
Type of Neuropathy | |||
Axonal | Demyelinating | ||
<65 | 36 (85.7) | 6 (14.3) | >0.05 |
≥65 | 21 (80.8) | 5 (19.2) | |
Diabetic Retinopathy | |||
Yes | No | ||
<65 | 36 (72) | 14 (28) | <0.001 |
≥65 | 17 (40.5) | 25 (59.5) | |
Diabetic Nephropathy | |||
Yes | No | ||
<65 | 33 (66) | 17 (34) | <0.001 |
≥65 | 16 (38.1) | 26 (61.9) |
Discussion
This study aims to assess the relationship between level of Zn and glycaemic control in Type 2 DM and to assess the relationship between level of Zn and microvascular complications of Type 2 DM such as diabetic neuropathy, diabetic retinopathy and diabetic nephropathy. We found a significant association between Zn levels (<65 μg/dL) and HbA1c levels (≥7%) in Type 2 DM patients (p <0.001). Furthermore, a significant association was observed between Zn levels and diabetic neuropathy, specifically, axonal neuropathy (p <0.001), diabetic retinopathy (p <0.001), and diabetic nephropathy (p <0.001) as compared to the patients with no Zn deficiency.
We found a significant association between Zn levels and HbA1c levels in Type 2 DM patients (p <0.001). Corroborative evidence (p<0.001) from prior research by Farooq et al. [11] aligns with the current study, further reinforcing the reliability of these findings. The prevalence of more than half the participants (n=50, 54.3%) falling below the recommended Zn threshold (<65 μg/dL) brings to the forefront the potential health implications associated with Zn deficiency. Indeed, our study cohort underwent a thorough dissection based on the duration of their Type 2 DM, with almost half (n=46, 50%) falling within the five to 10 years duration category (Table 1). This is in stark contrast as reported by Pan et al. [12], highlighting the unique demographic distinction inherent to divergent Type 2 DM cohorts under scrutiny. The outcomes of the present study pertained to the individuals (n=55, 59.8%) grappling with systemic hypertension closely aligned with those of a study conducted by Acharya et al. [13]. This correlation between the findings of the two studies lends credibility to the observed prevalence of systemic hypertension in the current investigation. Also, only one-third of patients (n=25, 27.2%) had controlled Type 2 DM signified by HbA1c level (≤ 7%) while the majority (67, 72.8%) had uncontrolled diabetes. Results of the present study bear semblance with the investigation conducted by Chadha et al. [14].
Analysis of our data related to Type 2 DM complications revealed that almost three-fourths of patients with Type 2 DM had diabetic neuropathy (n=68, 73.9%) that emerged as the most prevailing complication, followed by a two-thirds prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (n=53, 57.6%), and nearly half of the patients had diabetic (n=49, 53.2%). Upon further dissection, out of 68 patients with neuropathy, 57 patients (83.8%) had axonal neuropathy (Table 1). Upon relating with Zn deficiency (<65 μg/dL), majority of the patients (n=42, 84%) had neuropathy, while among diabetic patients with normal Zn level (>65 μg/dL), only 61.9% (n=26) patients had neuropathy. A statistically significant association was observed between zinc levels and diabetic neuropathy (p <0.001) (Table 2). In line with our results, a study conducted by Hussain et al. [15] further emphasizing the diverse nature of the current study conducted across different nations. The current investigation reveals patients with Zn deficiency (<65 μg/dL) had significantly higher rate of diabetic retinopathy (n=36, 72%) as compared to the patients with no Zn deficiency (>65 μg/dL) (n=17, 40.5%), also a higher proportion of patients with Zn deficiency (<65 μg/dL) had diabetic nephropathy (n=33, 66%) as compared to patients with no Zn deficiency (>65 μg/dL) (Table 2). Therefore, Type 2 DM patients with Zn deficiency had higher prevalence of microvascular complications as compared with diabetic patients with no zinc deficiency drawing a parallel with the study conducted by Luo et al. [16], further corroborating the reliability of the results achieved in our study. Mechanistically, as the human body cannot store Zn, it has to depend on daily dietary zinc intake to maintain homeostasis. As insulin maintains glucose homeostasis by phosphoinositide 3’-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway, Zn ions activate this cascade, resulting in glucose uptake and glycogen synthesis, thus decreasing blood glucose. Consequently, Zn deficiency increases blood glucose, resulting in all its associated complications chronically.
Strengths and limitations
To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the prevalence of Zn deficiency (<65 μg/dL) in Type 2 DM with glycemic control per se and assess its association with microvascular complications such as diabetic neuropathy, retinopathy, and nephropathy. In accordance with our selection criteria, we included only clinically diagnosed Type 2 DM excluding Type 1 DM and prediabetes; we admit that this might not fully account for some variability in our results. The generalizability of our findings is limited as we extracted data only from patients attending our hospital, so our representative data were exclusively from convenient sampling. The Zn estimation is limited to the demographics of Uttarakhand residents' dietary habits. Hence, the observed association between dietary Zn is specific to the region and thus cannot be generalized to other states of India and other populations. We tried to adjust for all potential confounders; however, residual confounding may have biased our results.
Conclusions
The study highlighted the high prevalence of Zn deficiency among Type 2 DM patients and established significant correlations between low Zn levels (<65 μg/dL) and poor glycemic control, as well as higher incidences of neuropathy, retinopathy, and nephropathy. These findings suggest that Zn status should be considered in the management and treatment strategies for Type 2 DM patients to potentially mitigate complications and improve outcomes. It is imperative that clinicians understand the optimal dosage of Zn for anti-hyperglycemic effects and potential side effects but also the interactions of Zn with other Type 2 DM complications, which warrants further investigation.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to sincerely thank Department of Medicine, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Jolly Grant, Dehradun, India for providing support during data collection.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Research Committee, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Jolly Grant, Dehradun, India issued approval SRHU/HIMS/RC/2024/238.
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Mohamad Akram, Naina Mehta, Yogesh P. Singh
Drafting of the manuscript: Mohamad Akram, Naina Mehta, Yogesh P. Singh
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Mohamad Akram, Naina Mehta, Yogesh P. Singh
Supervision: Mohamad Akram, Yogesh P. Singh
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Naina Mehta
References
- 1.The oxidative stress status in diabetes mellitus and diabetic nephropathy. Pan HZ, Zhang L, Guo MY, et al. Acta Diabetol. 2010;47 Suppl 1:71–76. doi: 10.1007/s00592-009-0128-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.World Health Organisation: Fact Sheet-Diabetes. [ Aug; 2024 ]. 2024. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diabetes https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diabetes
- 3.Effect of zinc supplementation on serum leptin levels and insulin resistance of obese women. Marreiro DN, Geloneze B, Tambascia MA, Lerário AC, Halpern A, Cozzolino SM. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2006;112:109–118. doi: 10.1385/bter:112:2:109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.World Health Organisation: Mobile technology for preventing NCDs. [ Aug; 2024 ]. 2024. https://www.who.int/india/health-topics/mobile-technology-for-preventing-ncds https://www.who.int/india/health-topics/mobile-technology-for-preventing-ncds
- 5.Diabetes mellitus and its complications in India. Unnikrishnan R, Anjana RM, Mohan V. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12:357–370. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2016.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Population causes and consequences of leading chronic diseases: a comparative analysis of prevailing explanations. Stuckler D. Milbank Q. 2008;86:273–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2008.00522.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zinc, insulin and diabetes. Chausmer AB. J Am Coll Nutr. 1998;17:109–115. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1998.10718735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zinc and diabetes--clinical links and molecular mechanisms. Jansen J, Karges W, Rink L. J Nutr Biochem. 2009;20:399–417. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2009.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dietary zinc supplementation attenuates hyperglycemia in db/db mice. Simon SF, Taylor CG. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2001;226:43–51. doi: 10.1177/153537020122600107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.[Effect of oral zinc administration on insulin sensitivity, leptin and androgens in obese males] Gómez-García A, Hernández-Salazar E, González-Ortiz M, Martínez-Abundis E. Rev Med Chil. 2006;134:279–284. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872006000300002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.The status of zinc in type 2 diabetic patients and its association with glycemic control. Farooq DM, Alamri AF, Alwhahabi BK, Metwally AM, Kareem KA. J Family Community Med. 2020;27:29–36. doi: 10.4103/jfcm.JFCM_113_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.The change of oxidative stress products in diabetes mellitus and diabetic retinopathy. Pan HZ, Zhang H, Chang D, Li H, Sui H. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:548–551. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.130542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Assessment of diabetes risk in an adult population using Indian diabetes risk score in an urban resettlement colony of Delhi. Acharya AS, Singh A, Dhiman B. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28462543/ J Assoc Physicians India. 2017;65:46–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Reproducibility of a prediabetes classification in a contemporary population. Chadha C, Pittas AG, Lary CW, et al. http://10.1016/j.metop.2020.100031. Metabol Open. 2020;6:100031. doi: 10.1016/j.metop.2020.100031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zinc deficiency correlates with severity of diabetic polyneuropathy. Hussein M, Fathy W, Hassan A, Elkareem RA, Marzouk S, Kamal YS. Brain Behav. 2021;11:0. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Relationship between serum zinc level and microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Luo YY, Zhao J, Han XY, Zhou XH, Wu J, Ji LN. Chin Med J (Engl) 2015;128:3276–3282. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.171357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]