Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

Research Square logoLink to Research Square
[Preprint]. 2024 Dec 5:rs.3.rs-5448262. [Version 1] doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5448262/v1

Myosin-dependent short actin filaments contribute to peripheral widening in developing stereocilia

Xiayi Liao 1, Chun-Yu Tung 1, Jocelyn F Krey 2,3, Ghazaleh Behnammanesh 4, Joseph A Cirilo Jr 5, Mert Colpan 6, Christopher M Yengo 5, Peter G Barr-Gillespie 2,3, Jonathan E Bird 4, Benjamin J Perrin 1
PMCID: PMC11643313  PMID: 39678325

Abstract

In the auditory and vestibular systems, stereocilia are actin-based protrusions that convert mechanical stimuli into electrical signals. During development, stereocilia elongate and widen by adding filamentous actin (F-actin), attaining their mature shape necessary for mechanosensitive function. Myosin motors, including MYO3A/B and MYO15A, are required for normal stereocilia growth, but the regulation of actin and the impact of myosins on actin assembly remain unclear. We focused on stereocilia widening, which requires the addition of new filaments to the bundle of linear F-actin comprising the initial stereocilia core. Our findings revealed that newly expressed actin incorporates at the stereocilia tip first, then along the shaft to promote stereocilia widening. The newly incorporated F-actin surrounded the existing F-actin core, suggesting that the core is stable once formed, with additional actin adding only to the periphery. To better understand the nature of incorporating actin, we used several probes to detect globular (G-) actin, F-actin barbed ends, and F-actin pointed ends. While F-actin core filaments are parallel and thought to present only barbed ends at stereocilia tips, we also detected F-actin pointed ends, indicating a previously undetected population of short actin filaments. Overexpression of actin resulted in abundant F-actin pointed and barbed ends along the periphery of the stereocilia shaft, suggesting that short actin filaments contribute to stereocilia widening. Short actin filament levels correlated with the levels of MYO3A/B and MYO15A at stereocilia tips, suggesting these myosins generate or stabilize short actin filaments essential for stereocilia widening and elongation.

Introduction

Stereocilia are giant microvilli-like protrusions on sensory hair cells that are specialized to detect sound as well as linear and angular acceleration in the inner ear. The mechanosensitive function of hair cells relies on stereocilia that are organized into rows of decreasing heights, which in the case of cochlear hair cells can detect nanometer-scale deflections induced by sound. Similar to microvilli, stereocilia are built around a filamentous actin (F-actin) core where hundreds of filaments are packed together and uniformly oriented with their fast-growing barbed ends towards the protrusion tip1,2. Regulation of the growth and stability of these F-actin bundles is crucial for stereocilia development and maintenance.

Early in development, stereocilia resemble microvilli before undergoing stages of growth where they lengthen or widen. These growth stages have been best described in mouse auditory inner hair cells (IHCs)3,4, which are the cochlear hair cell subtype that transmits sound information via afferent innervation to the central nervous system. In stage I, microvilli emerge on the IHC apical surface, then a subset of those microvilli elongate in stage II to form stereocilia that are arranged in rows of different lengths. Stereocilia then widen during stage III, which corresponds to postnatal days 0–8 for IHCs in the apical turn of the mouse cochlea. Finally, in stage IV, stereocilia in the tallest row, referred to as row 1, elongate to their final length4 to produce the mature stereocilia bundle with a staircase-like morphology (Fig. 1a). These observations suggest actin behaves differently in each growth stage to either lengthen or thicken the F-actin bundle, which dictates stereocilia shape and ultimately hair cell mechanosensitivity.

Fig. 1: EGFP-actin incorporation pattern during stereocilia widening.

Fig. 1:

a, Diagrams of inner hair cell (IHC) stereocilia, oriented en face in a 3D view and as a side view. b, A single P6 IHC imaged at timepoints (from 2 to 18 h) after transfection with EGFP-actin. Left panels are 3D reconstructions oriented en face except for the final image, which is a top-down view (scale bar represents 5 μm). Right panels are side views of stereocilia made from x-z reslices (scale bar represents 1 μm). The outline of a row 1 stereocilium is traced by yellow dashed lines and the cuticular plate is denoted by blue dashed lines. The lowest panel is an x-y slice showing stereocilia in cross-section mid-way down row 1 stereocilia. The inset (1 × 1 μm), a magnified region marked by a red box, demonstrates peripheral EGFP-actin localization around row 1 stereocilia. c, EGFP-actin transfected IHC (P5) imaged by expansion microscopy, stained with antibodies against γ-actin (ACTG1) (magenta) and EGFP (green). The top panel is a 3D reconstruction and lower panels are x-y slices through the center of stereocilia. Scale bar represents 10 μm. d, Lattice SIM images of EGFP-actin or EGFP-FSCN2 (green and grey) from transfected IHC (P5) stereocilia with phalloidin-stained F-actin (magenta). Scale bar represents 5 μm.

Several studies have documented actin behavior in developing and mature stereocilia2,59, but have not converged on a clear understanding of how actin assembles to produce the correct stereocilia core dimensions. Early studies2,5 assessed EGFP-actin localization in fixed cells at timepoints after transfection and observed that EGFP-actin incorporated at stereocilia tips first, and then seemed to progress down the stereocilia shaft with time. These observations were interpreted as evidence of actin treadmilling, such that the stereocilia actin core underwent continuous renewal where actin monomers added at the tips and were released at the bases. Subsequent studies69 using a variety of approaches confirmed that stereocilia actin incorporation is most evident at stereocilia tips, and further demonstrated that actin addition at tips can drive elongation. However, these studies also demonstrated that the stereocilia actin core was highly stable once formed, thus contradicting the treadmilling model. Absent treadmilling, it is unclear how actin assembly at stereocilia tips contributes to stereocilia widening.

Stereocilia lengthening and widening is known to depend on different tip-localized unconventional myosin complexes. MYO15A is a core component of the elongation complex, so named because IHCs lacking any member of the complex have exceptionally short stereocilia1014. The elongation complex localizes to row 1 and row 2 tips in early postnatal development, and more exclusively to row 1 tips during stage IV growth. The paralogs MYO3A and MYO3B also localize to both row 1 and row 2 stereocilia tips1517; however, their loss results in stereocilia that are longer and thinner than normal stereocilia16, suggesting the myosin-III proteins promote widening at the expense of elongation. While MYO15A, MYO3A, and MYO3B play pivotal roles in stereocilia growth, it is unclear how they regulate actin behavior to promote elongation or widening. Stereocilia widening is particularly puzzling because there is not a known mechanism by which actin incorporation at stereocilia tips can lead to the addition of new F-actin to the seemingly stable stereocilia actin core.

We investigated how stereocilia widen, first by using high-resolution live-cell imaging of transfected IHCs to visualize actin incorporation in widening stereocilia. Consistent with prior work, fluorescent actin first incorporated at stereocilia tips before extending down the stereocilia shaft until it reached the base. Rather than a treadmilling mechanism, the new actin surrounded the existing, stable actin core, suggesting that new filaments incorporate first at stereocilia tips and then along the stereocilia shaft to produce new, peripheral core filaments. We then used actin binding proteins as probes to reveal that G-actin, as well as F-actin barbed and pointed ends, are all detectable at stereocilia tips. Discovering F-actin pointed ends at stereocilia tips was unexpected because F-actin in the stereocilia core is thought to be uniformly oriented with only barbed ends at tips1. This discrepancy suggests that there is a previously unidentified population of short actin filaments at stereocilia tips. The level of this actin species depends on MYO15A and MYO3A/B, suggesting that short actin filaments serve as intermediaries in myosin-dependent stereocilia actin assembly.

Results

Stereocilia widen by adding new actin around stable core

To understand how widening occurs within stereocilia, we revisited the question of EGFP-actin incorporation by imaging individual P6 IHCs at intervals after transfection using high-resolution Airyscan microscopy. In these experiments, EGFP-actin invariably incorporated at the tips of stereocilia first, and then subsequently appeared along the stereocilia shaft (Fig. 1b). In contrast to the treadmilling model2,5, we observed that EGFP-actin added to the periphery of the stereocilia shaft, but not to the preexisting F-actin core. This pattern of addition was particularly evident 18 hours after transfection in longitudinal slices showing the entire stereocilia length, and in cross sections in the middle of the stereocilia where EGFP-actin appeared as a ring (Fig. 1b, top-down view). To further define the spatial localization of transfected EGFP-actin, we also imaged samples that were fixed 18 hours after transfection at higher resolution using both expansion microscopy (Fig. 1c) and lattice structured illumination microscopy (lattice-SIM) (Fig. 1d). As with live cells, the most typical incorporation pattern was a solid cap of EGFP-actin at the stereocilia tip and a thin ring of EGFP-actin around the stereocilia shaft (Fig. 1cd). In contrast, transiently expressed fascin-2 actin crosslinker (EGFP-FSCN2), also imaged with lattice-SIM, infiltrated into the existing core (Fig. 1d, right panel), which is consistent with a previously documented EGFP-FSCN2 turnover pattern18 and shows that the core is accessible to proteins similar in size to actin. Together, these findings demonstrate new EGFP-actin incorporates first at the tip, then surrounds the existing stereocilia core.

G-actin, F-actin barbed ends, and F-actin pointed ends are present at stereocilia tips

Actin incorporation at stereocilia tips is thought to result from polymerization at the barbed ends of the actin filaments that are part of the stereocilia core2,57. However, it is unclear how actin filaments are added to the periphery of the core to cause widening. We hypothesized that widening depends on an intermediate arrangement of F-actin during stereocilia development, which we sought to characterize using probes to detect G-actin, as well as the barbed or pointed ends of F-actin. We analyzed intact cells as well as cells extracted with saponin, which depletes the soluble G-actin pool from cells19. To characterize the distribution of G-actin in IHC stereocilia, we first expressed RPEL1-EGFP, a G-actin binding domain from the protein MAL fused to EGFP20, in IHCs. This G-actin reporter was detected throughout the stereocilia, but was noticeably enriched at tips (Fig. 2ab). When cells were extracted with saponin, RPEL1-EGFP signal was drastically reduced to nearly undetectable levels (Fig. 2a, right panels), indicating that either the probe or G-actin readily diffused away. We also probed for G-actin in freshly dissected, saponin-permeabilized cochlear tissue from P5 mice with the JLA20 antibody, which selectively binds to G-actin but not F-actin19. Under these conditions JLA20 staining was enriched at row 2 tips but was not evident at row 1 tips (Fig. 2ce). In contrast, the AC-15 anti-β-actin antibody19 stained the entire length of stereocilia (Fig. 2c, left panels). Thus, JLA20 staining likely marks a population of G-actin at row 2 stereocilia tips that is anchored to prevent extraction by saponin treatment. Interestingly, the JLA20 signal was absent by P9 (Fig. 2c and e), suggesting that G-actin at row 2 tips is developmentally regulated.

Fig. 2: G-actin is enriched at stereocilia tips.

Fig. 2:

a, RPEL1-EGFP transfected IHCs unextracted or extracted by saponin before fixation. F-actin was stained with phalloidin (magenta). b, Representative line scans drawn down the center of stereocilia in RPEL1-EGFP transfected, unextracted IHCs at P5. In (b) and (d), line scans were drawn from tip towards the base down the center of stereocilia, the peak fluorescent signal was set as 0 on the x-axis, and the fluorescent intensity was normalized to the row 1 maximum. c, Images of IHCs from saponin-permeabilized P5 or P9 mouse organ of Corti that was probed before fixation with antibodies against β-actin (AC15) or G-actin (JLA20) (green and grey); F-actin was counterstained post-fixation with phalloidin (magenta). d, Representative line scans of JLA20 stained P5 IHC stereocilia. e, Quantification of JLA20 level at stereocilia tips normalized to the average intensity of cell junctions. Smaller circles represent the average value of stereocilia tips from individual cells. Larger open circles represent the average value of cells from one individual cochlea (N). P values from two-tailed paired t tests based on N are indicated (n.s., not significant; ****, P < 0.0001). Results are collected from 9–11 cochleae and from at least 2 independent experiments. Scale bar represents 5 μm.

To further define the actin network in stereocilia, we transfected cells with constructs encoding the F-actin binding proteins EGFP-TMOD1 and EGFP-SH3BGRL2, which each recognize F-actin pointed ends21,22. Both pointed-end binding proteins preferentially bound to stereocilia tips compared to the stereocilia shaft (Fig. 3ab, Supplementary Fig. 1ab). Following saponin extraction, the tip enrichment of TMOD1 signals became more evident, with a greater reduction in shaft signal (Fig. 3a and c), indicating that a subpopulation of TMOD1-bound F-actin is anchored at tips. To further assay for F-actin pointed ends, we probed saponin permeabilized ear tissue with purified actin pointed-end binding proteins DNaseI23 and His-TMOD1. Both proteins bound robustly at row 1 and row 2 stereocilia tips (Fig. 3d). We detected F-actin barbed ends with a similar strategy, this time employing purified His-CAPZ protein24. As expected based on the known arrangement of F-actin core filaments, His-CAPZ preferentially labeled the tips of stereocilia (Fig. 3d). While F-actin barbed ends are expected at stereocilia tips because actin in stereocilia is comprised of parallel filaments with barbed ends terminating at tips, detecting pointed ends at tips was unexpected. The pointed end signal suggests that there is a previously unidentified population of short actin filaments at stereocilia tips (Fig. 3e). We will refer to these putative actin filaments as tip filaments to distinguish them from the bundled core filaments, which comprise the main structure of stereocilia.

Fig. 3: F-actin barbed ends and F-actin pointed ends are present at stereocilia tips.

Fig. 3:

a, EGFP-TMOD1 transfected P5 IHCs, either unextracted or extracted by saponin before fixation, that were also stained with phalloidin for F-actin (magenta). b, Representative line scans drawn down the center of stereocilia of EGFP-TMOD1 transfected, unextracted P5 IHCs. The peak EGFP level was set as 0 on x axis and the fluorescence intensity was normalized to the maximal fluorescence intensity of row 1. c, Line scans quantifying EGFP-TMOD1 levels from stereocilia tips toward shafts in saponin-extracted or unextracted P5 IHCs. The shadow lines represent individual stereocilia (n); the thick solid lines are the average level of all stereocilia. The line scan results were collected from 0 to 0.5 μm (below tips) on x axis described in (b). Results were collected from 2–3 cochleae. The data were plotted as mean ± SD and analyzed by two-way ANOVA (****, P < 0.0001 for the effects of extraction, distance from stereocilia tips, and interactions between these parameters, based on n). d, His-TMOD1, DNaseI, or His-CAPZ (green, gray) localization after probing permeabilized IHCs at P5–6. F-actin was stained with phalloidin (magenta). e, Diagrams of potential actin structures in stereocilia with F-actin barbed and pointed ends bound by His-CAPZ and His-TMOD1, respectively. f, Lattice SIM images of His-TMOD1, DNaseI, and His-CAPZ (cyan, thermal lookup table) at row 1 stereocilia tips with phalloidin-stained F-actin (magenta), which were quantified in (g-h). Magenta arrowheads denote the position of peak fluorescence intensity. g, Representative line scans drawn down the center of stereocilia showing the intensity of His-TMOD1 (blue), DNaseI (purple), His-CAPZ (red), and F-actin actin (black). The stereocilia tip was defined as being the point where phalloidin intensity reached the average value in the tip region (indicated by the black dashed arrow). Peak intensities for His-TMOD1, DNaseI, and His-CAPZ are indicated by colored dashed arrows. The offset of the probe centers from the stereocilia tips (− is below tips; + is above tips) were determined and plotted in (h). h, A frequency histogram showing the pixel offsets of His-TMOD1 (blue), DNaseI (purple), and His-CAPZ (red) from the stereocilia tip. The histogram of each probe is fitted with a Gaussian curve. Mean offsets for peak of the Gaussian curves based on the pixel size (31 nm × 31nm): His-TMOD1, 16 nm; DNaseI, 24 nm; His-CAPZ, 51 nm. R-squared value of the fit: His-TMOD1, 0.996; DNaseI, 0.976; His-CAPZ, 0.984. All scale bars represent 5 μm.

Orientation, solubility and dynamics of tip filaments

To better understand the relationship between barbed and pointed end probes at stereocilia tips, we compared the relative localization or offset of maximal value of the His-CAPZ, His-TMOD1, or DNaseI spot from the tip of the phalloidin-stained F-actin in stereocilia in lattice-SIM images (Fig. 3fg). The peak value from a histogram (Fig. 3h) of these values demonstrate similar localization for the pointed-end probes DNaseI and His-TMOD1. The barbed end probe, His-CAPZ, was more distal, indicating that the barbed and pointed ends are spatially separated. These results are consistent with a model where short tip filaments run parallel with core filaments such as that presented in Fig. 3e.

If tip filaments are separate from stereocilia core filaments, then they should have different solubility and behavior. To test this idea, we extracted freshly dissected cochlear tissue with a high-salt buffer to disrupt protein binding interactions that depend on electrostatic charge, and then labeled His-TMOD1 in standard buffer. The phalloidin-stained stereocilia core appeared unchanged by high-salt extraction but pointed end labeling at stereocilia tips was reduced by around 70% (Supplementary Fig. 2ab), which is consistent with extraction of tip filaments. Barbed end levels probed by His-CAPZ were also reduced (Supplementary Fig. 2cd), though to a lesser extent, likely reflecting labeling of the remaining core filament barbed ends. To assess tip filament behavior, we incubated postnatal cochlear explants in media containing latrunculin A (LatA), a drug that sequesters G-actin and depolymerizes dynamic F-actin structures25. In P5 explants, LatA treatment for 1 hour reduced His-TMOD1 labeling by 50% at row 1 tips and 65% at row 2 tips. Pointed end levels largely recovered after the drug was washed out (Fig. 4ab). The loss of tip filaments with LatA treatment, and their regeneration following washout, show that they require ongoing polymerization to stay intact, which is behavior typical of dynamic actin networks.

Fig. 4: Tip filament levels during development of apical IHCs.

Fig. 4:

a, His-TMOD1 staining (green, grey) of P5 IHCs after latrunculin A (LatA) treatment and following washout; F-actin stained with phalloidin (magenta). b, Quantification of His-TMOD1 level from row 1 and row 2 stereocilia tips. The fluorescence intensity was normalized to the average fluorescence intensity of row 1 stereocilia from DMSO-treated samples. Five cochleae were averaged and plotted ± SD (large open circles); His-TMOD1 mean intensity from tips of individual stereocilia were plotted as small dots with the color corresponding to their cochlea. P values from two-tailed unpaired t tests comparing cochlea averages are indicated (*, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001). Scale bar represents 5 μm. c, Left panels are His-TMOD1 labeling (green, grey) of IHCs at P3, 7, 8, and 9. F-actin in stereocilia was stained with phalloidin (magenta). Scale bar represents 5 μm. Regions marked by yellow boxes are magnified to the side (Scale bar represents 2 μm). The timeline on the right is of IHC bundle development in mouse cochlea showing the growth details of specific rows during Stage III and IV based on4. d-e, Quantification of His-TMOD1 level from stereocilia tips at P3, 7, 8, and 9. Row 1 and 2 are separately plotted. f, Quantification of His-TMOD1 level from row 1 stereocilia shafts at P3, 7, 8, and 9. Fluorescence quantifications from (d-f) were normalized to the average fluorescence intensity of the row 1 level from P3 samples to allow comparison between multiple experiments. P values for two-tailed unpaired t tests are indicated (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01) based on cochleae. Smaller circles represent stereocilia; larger open circles represent cochleae. Results from 3–7 cochleae were averaged and plotted ± SD. The data were collected from at least 2 independent experiments.

Tip filaments are more abundant at widening stages of stereocilia growth

If tip filaments contribute to stereocilia growth, their levels would likely correlate with when stereocilia are widening during stage III growth (P0-P8) or elongating during stage IV (P8-P15)4. By probing permeabilized cochlea dissected from mice of post-natal ages, we found that His-TMOD1 staining at tips was highest at P3, and at that age the staining was similar at row 1 and row 2 tips. As development progressed, staining decreased at the tips of both rows, but more rapidly in row 2 so that by P9 signal was faint at row 1 tips and lost at row 2 tips (Fig. 4ce). His-TMOD1 labeling of stereocilia shafts, though faint compared to staining at tips, followed the same trend, decreasing between P7 and P8 as widening slowed (Fig. 4c and f). Thus, pointed end levels at stereocilia tips and along the shaft correlated well with widening, but tip filaments were still present at row 1 stereocilia tips when they switched to elongation.

Discontinuous F-actin formed when stereocilia widen by actin overexpression

To assess the actin states during widening, we overexpressed EGFP-actin and measured the level of barbed and pointed ends in the shaft as stereocilia widen (Fig. 5). Actin overexpression increased stereocilia width compared to untransfected cells as assessed by measuring the full width at half maximum intensity of phalloidin staining (Fig. 5b, Supplementary Fig. 3a). His-TMOD1 and His-CAPZ staining of saponin-permeabilized tissue was increased in stereocilia shafts of EGFP-actin expressing cells (Fig. 5cd). The staining was more enriched at the periphery of the shafts (Supplementary Fig. 3bd), corresponding to the addition of EGFP-actin added to the sides of the existing F-actin core. As both barbed and pointed ends were detected uniformly along the stereocilia length, the newly added actin is likely composed of short filaments, rather than long filaments that grow continuously from either the stereocilia tip or base.

Fig. 5: Stereocilia widening correlates with increased F-actin barbed and pointed levels in the shaft.

Fig. 5:

a, His-TMOD1 or His-CAPZ (magenta, gray) labeling in permeabilized IHCs transfected by EGFP-actin (green). F-actin is stained with phalloidin (blue) to show stereocilia. Regions of interest are denoted by light blue dashed boxes and magnified to the right. For comparison, stereocilia shaft labeling of His-TMOD1 or His-CAPZ is indicated by blue arrows in untransfected cells and magenta arrows in EGFP-actin transfected cells. Images were acquired by conventional confocal microscopy and processed by deconvolution. b-d, Graphs showing the linear correlation of the EGFP-actin level in the stereocilia shaft with stereocilia width (b), His-TMOD1 shaft staining (c), and His-CAPZ shaft staining (d). Stereocilia are plotted as individual symbols and those from the same cell are represented by identical color and shape. Simple linear regression analysis was applied to the data. R-squared values for linear regressions from (b-d) are 0.66, 0.52, 0.55, respectively. 9–13 cochleae from at least 2 independent experiments were collected for analysis. Scale bar represents 5 μm.

To assess the requirement of barbed or pointed end polymerization for actin incorporation at the tip or shaft, we expressed red fluorescent protein (RFP)-tagged polymerization-incompetent mutants DVD-actin (D286A, V287A, D288A) and AP-actin (A204E, P243K). Existing actin filaments can incorporate DVD-actin at their barbed ends and AP-actin at their pointed ends, but the mutant actin then blocks subsequent monomer addition2628. Both mutant actins localized to stereocilia tips, but did not appreciably incorporate along the stereocilia shaft as compared to neighboring cells that expressed normal EGFP-actin (Fig. 6a). Interestingly, in co-expression experiments, AP-actin, and to a lesser extent DVD-actin, altered the incorporation of EGFP-actin at stereocilia tips. In these cells, a thin crescent of mutant actin at the distal tip prevented EGFP-actin from forming a cap at the stereocilia tip (Fig. 6ab), with line scans along the periphery of the stereocilia demonstrating that EGFP-actin was displaced (Fig. 6c). While mutant actin disrupted the actin network at stereocilia tips, it did not prevent incorporation of co-expressed EGFP-actin along the sides of the stereocilia shaft. This observation suggests that short filaments are regulated differently at stereocilia tips than along the shaft, with those at the tip perhaps being more dynamic and therefore vulnerable to mutant actin that poisons polymerization.

Fig. 6: Polymerization-incompetent mutant actin disrupts the incorporation of wild-type actin at stereocilia tips.

Fig. 6:

a, IHCs transfected with EGFP-actin (green) and mutant actins (magenta). Left panels: IHCs transfected with EGFP-actin alone or in combination with RFP-DVD-actin; Right panels: IHC transfected with EGFP-actin and RFP-AP-actin, adjacent to an untransfected IHC. White arrows indicate the selected region magnified in (b). Scale bar represents 5 μm. b, Magnified insets from left to right: expression of EGFP-actin only, co-expression of EGFP-actin with RFP-DVD-actin or RFP-AP-actin. Scale bar represents 1 μm. c, Line scans quantifying the fluorescence distribution of RFP-mutant actin relative to EGFP-actin from the co-transfected IHCs. The peak RFP level was set as 0 on x axis and the fluorescence intensity was normalized to the maximal fluorescence intensity of row 1. The line scan results were collected from −0.4 μm (above tips) to 0.8 μm (below tips) on x axis as described. The shadow lines represent individual stereocilia; the thick solid lines with error bars are the average level of all stereocilia with SD. Results were collected from 16–19 cells.

Tip filament levels vary with MYO3 and MYO15 expression

Our data suggests that short actin filaments at stereocilia tips and along the shaft are key intermediaries in forming the stereocilia core. We next wanted to understand how tip filaments relate to tip-localized myosins, which regulate stereocilia elongation and widening. Two different classes of myosins, including MYO3A and MYO3B, encoded by the Myo3a and Myo3b genes, as well as MYO15A, localize to stereocilia tips10,15. MYO15A is essential for normal elongation and for establishing the unique protein complements that define row 1 and row 2 tips10,11,29. MYO3A/B, in contrast, is required to establish normal stereocilia dimensions, which are abnormally tall and thin in the mouse double knockout16,17. As an initial test whether myosins interact with tip filaments, we incubated saponin-permeabilized cochlear tissue with 4 mM sodium orthovanadate. This inhibitor stabilizes ADP-Pi bound myosin, which is a conformation that binds F-actin weakly30,31. Compared to the control condition, vanadate treatment decreased the level of His-TMOD1 staining at stereocilia tips and along the stereocilia shaft (Supplementary 4ab). This reduction is consistent with the hypothesis that myosins normally bind tip filaments and prevent their loss following cell permeabilization.

We next sought to localize tip filaments relative to MYO15A and MYO3A which are known to occupy different zones at stereocilia tips. Using U-ExM and lattice SIM, we found tip filaments overlapped both the broader MYO3A zone and the more distal MYO15A zone (Fig. 7a, Supplementary Fig.4cd). The specific patterns differed according to stereocilia row. In row 1, MYO15A localized as a cap at stereocilia tips; by contrast, MYO3A localized just below the MYO15A zone. Tip filaments, labeled with His-TMOD1 detected by an anti-TMOD1 antibody, were detected in both the MYO15A and MYO3A zones (Fig. 7a). In row 2 stereocilia, MYO15A antibody staining was reduced compared to row 1 and was restricted to a small patch at the distal tip (Fig. 7a, right panels). MYO3A staining was distributed more broadly at the tip (Fig. 7a, middle panels). As at row 1 tips, His-TMOD1 labeled tip filaments overlapped both myosins, but most tip filaments in row 2 coincided with the more prevalent MYO3A staining.

Fig. 7: Tip filaments depend on tip-localized myosins.

Fig. 7:

a, Representative images of His-TMOD1 stained row 1 stereocilia and row 2 stereocilia, co-labeled after expansion microscopy with antibodies to endogenous MYO3A or MYO15A (green) from P5 mice. NHS-ester (grey) stained total protein. b, His-TMOD1 (green, grey) labeling in Myo3 double mutant (Myo3aΔ14/Δ14 Myo3bΔ12/Δ12, noted in Supplementary Fig. 5a) and littermate control IHCs at P4. c, Quantification of His-TMOD1 level from the tips of row 1 stereocilia in Myo3a;Myo3b G0 mutants generated via i-GONAD (Supplementary Fig. 5a) and in littermate control IHCs, each at P4. The His-TMOD1 level was normalized to the average fluorescence intensity of row 1 stereocilia in control. Smaller circles represent stereocilia; larger open circles represent averages from mice (N). Results from 4 mice were plotted with mean ± SD. d, HA-TMOD1 (green, grey) labeling in Myo15a mutant (Myo15aΔ25/Δ25) and littermate control (Myo15aΔ25/+) IHCs at P4. e, Quantification of HA-TMOD1 level from the tips of row 1 stereocilia in MYO15A mutant and littermate control IHCs (P4). The level of HA-TMOD1 was normalized to the average intensity of cell junctions. Smaller circles represent stereocilia; larger open circles represent averages from cochleae (N). Results from 3 mice were plotted with mean ± SD. P values of (c) and (e) for two-tailed unpaired t tests are indicated based on N (*, P < 0.05 and **, P < 0.01). f, His-TMOD1 (magenta, grey) labeling in an EGFP-MYO3A (green) transfected IHC and a neighboring untransfected cell (P5). F-actin was stained by phalloidin (blue). g, Graphs of His-TMOD1 and EGFP-MYO3A fluorescence intensities at row 1 or row 2 stereocilia tips. Simple linear regression analysis was applied to the data. Linear regression R-squared value was 0.52 (row 1) and 0.51 (row 2). h, His-TMOD1 (magenta, grey) labeling in an EGFP-MYO15A-2 (green) transfected IHC and a neighboring untransfected cell (P5). i, Graph of His-TMOD1 and EGFP-MYO15A-2 fluorescence intensities at row 1 stereocilia tips. Simple linear regression analysis was applied to the data. Linear regression R-squared value was 0.88. Individual stereocilia are plotted, collected from 9–10 cochleae. At least 2 independent experiments were collected for analysis in (g) and (i). Scale bars in all panels represent 5 μm.

To assess the consequence of myosin loss on tip filaments in IHC stereocilia, Myo3a and Myo3b were mutated with CRISPR/Cas9 that was delivered to E0.7 embryos in situ by the i-GONAD technique32, which generated a variety of small deletions in early exons of each gene that encode N-terminal kinase domains (Supplemental Fig. 5a). Myo3aΔ14/Δ14 Myo3bΔ12/Δ12 IHCs in mice bred from a G0 founder (mutant 2 alleles, Supplemental figure 5A) had long and thin IHC stereocilia at P4 that resembled those from previously described Myo3a/b double knockouts16 (Fig. 7b). The mutant IHC stereocilia had markedly reduced His-TMOD1 staining at row 1 and row 2 stereocilia tips compared to cells from wild-type tissue, or from littermate mice heterozygous at both loci (Fig. 7bc). Using a similar approach, we also generated a Myo15a mutant mouse with a 25 base pair deletion in exon 19, which encodes the motor domain. Homozygous Myo15aΔ25/Δ25 IHCs had reduced pointed-end labeling as compared to heterozygous littermates (Fig. 7de), though the decrease was less than for the Myo3a/b mutants. A similar reduction in His-TMOD1 staining was observed in mice homozygous for the well-characterized Myo15a shaker allele (Supplementary Fig. 5d), which has a mutation in the motor domain thought to abolish the function of all isoforms11,13,29,33. In addition, one G0 CRISPR/Cas9 Myo15a mutant had a mosaic phenotype where hair cells with normal morphology and His-TMOD1 staining were adjacent to cells with short stereocilia and reduced His-TMOD1 levels. (Supplementary Fig. 5c). Finally, MYO3A localized normally in the Myo15aΔ25/Δ25 mutant (Supplementary Fig. 5e). Similarly, MYO15A localized to stereocilia tips at normal levels in the Myo3a/b double mutant (Supplementary Fig. 5f), suggesting that each myosin independently contributes to tip filament levels.

To determine if increasing MYO15A or MYO3A protein levels increased tip filament levels, we transfected IHCs with EGFP-MYO3A (Supplementary Fig. 6a); EGFP-K50R-MYO3A, which lacks kinase activity that autoinhibits motor function34 (Fig. 7f); or EGFP-MYO15A isoform 2 (Fig. 7h). His-TMOD1 staining at both row 1 and row 2 tips increased with EGFP-MYO3A expression (Supplementary Fig. 6a) or with EGFP-K50R-MYO3A levels (Fig. 7fg). EGFP-MYO15A-2 expression also increased His-TMOD1 staining, albeit primarily at row 1 tips, reflecting the localization pattern of this myosin (Fig. 7hi). The mean fluorescence intensity at row 1 stereocilia tips, normalized to neighboring untransfected cells, was 2.0 ± 0.7 and 2.1 ± 0.7 (mean ± SD) for EGFP-K50R-MYO3A and EGFP-MYO15A-2 expressing cells, respectively, a difference which was not statistically significant. Of note, stereocilia were slightly wider with overexpression of MYO3A (Supplementary Fig. 6bc), which was not observed with MYO15A transfection, suggesting that tip filaments connected to MYO3A are more likely to enter the widening pathway. Together, these data show that the level of short actin filaments at stereocilia tips is influenced by both MYO3A and MYO15A, suggesting that these myosins may regulate stereocilia growth in part through the use of short actin filaments.

Discussion

This study offers new insights into how actin behaves in developing stereocilia that are widening, which is a key developmental step in stereocilia maturation. Super-resolution imaging revealed that newly expressed EGFP-actin first accumulates at stereocilia tips before incorporating along the stereocilia shaft. Critically, the new actin does not replace the existing stereocilia F-actin core, but rather it surrounds it, suggesting that a stereocilia shaft widens by adding new actin filaments to its periphery. We found that the arrangement of actin at the stereocilia tip is more complicated than is accounted for by existing models, all of which describe only termination of the long F-actin filaments that form the stereocilia core. Besides these core filaments, we also characterized a dynamic population of short actin filaments at stereocilia tips using probes detecting F-actin barbed and pointed ends. Short actin filaments seem to also be involved in stereocilia widening because both barbed and pointed ends of F-actin increase along the stereocilia shaft as EGFP-actin incorporates. Finally, tip filament levels are regulated by MYO3A and MYO15A proteins, which are critical determinants of stereocilia width and length. Based on the relationship between tip filaments, myosins, and stereocilia growth, we propose that myosins use, and perhaps generate, tip filaments as intermediates in the assembly of new stereocilia core filaments.

Where do tip filaments come from?

The source of short actin filaments is one of the most interesting unsolved mysteries. One possibility is that there is an as-yet unidentified nucleator, such as the ARP2/3 complex or formins, that resides at stereocilia tips and generates short filaments. Alternatively, as levels of MYO3 and MYO15A proteins correlate with tip filaments abundance, perhaps myosins themselves directly nucleate F-actin. There is experimental support for this idea, as non-muscle myosin II has long been known to nucleate actin in vitro3537. More recently, purified, recombinant MYO15A was shown to have a similar nucleation activity, both in bulk assembly assays and more directly by watching filaments form in TIRF assays38,39. In addition, a novel Myo15a point mutation in the motor domain both decreased stereocilia growth and the nucleation ability of the purified protein in vitro38. Although a direct nucleation mechanism is intriguing because it would neatly couple the myosins that are critical for stereocilia growth with F-actin assembly, other mechanisms are conceivable. For example, myosin motors can exert enough force to break actin filaments40 and could perhaps generate tip filaments from core filaments in this fashion. Yet another possibility is that myosins deliver a nucleation factor, although this seems less likely considering that MYO15A and MYO3A both increase tip filament levels even though their tails bind different cargos. Nevertheless, each of these mechanisms for generating tip filaments is plausible, and more experimental approaches will be required to decide between them.

Role of short actin filaments in stereocilia widening

We propose that during stereocilia widening, short actin filaments exist along the stereocilia shaft, which subsequently mature into long actin filaments, which are well-known to characterize the actin core. This proposal is supported by His-TMOD1 staining observed along the stereocilia shaft in stage III inner hair cells (IHCs), suggesting that pointed ends are distributed throughout the length of the developing stereocilia core. Consistent with short filaments maturing into long filaments as widening concludes, pointed-end staining decreased as the cells entered stage IV. In addition, overexpressing EGFP-actin increased both barbed and pointed end labeling along stereocilia shafts, indicating that short actin filaments were formed as stereocilia widened. Short actin filaments that contribute to widening could originate at the stereocilium tip and then move down in some fashion to populate the shaft. Such a tip origination model is consistent with data showing that actin assembly is most evident at stereocilia tips and that MYO3A/B localizes to stereocilia tips, regulates tip filament levels, and is required for normal widening.

While the tip origination model seems feasible, it is also possible that the stereocilia shaft and tip both use short actin filaments, but that those filaments are nucleated independently by distinct mechanisms. In keeping with this idea, expressing mutant, non-polymerizable actin that blocked either the barbed or pointed ends of existing filaments perturbed the addition of EGFP-actin to the tip but not to the shaft. Regardless of their origin, both models posit that short actin filaments, seeded along the periphery of an existing filament bundle, grow by monomer addition or annealing to form the long, unbranched actin filaments characteristic of stereocilia.

The many states of actin in developing stereocilia

Identifying actin states within stereocilia is complicated by the exceptionally high density of F-actin, as well as the high concentration of other proteins at stereocilia tips, which together interfere with direct imaging approaches. We instead deployed a repertoire of G- and F-actin binding proteins as selective probes to detect either monomeric actin or the barbed or pointed ends of F-actin. Abundant data on actin structure as monomers, filaments, and when bound to proteins at filament ends are available and are useful for interpreting the results of our labeling experiments. At the barbed end of actin filaments, monomers present subdomains 1 and 3 and recent cryo-EM data show that these domains undergo a conformational change to flatten relative to each other as monomers polymerize onto the filament end41. Thus, a barbed end binding protein like CAPZ or an antibody like JLA20 can readily distinguish F-actin from G-actin. The pointed ends of the filament do not change as dramatically compared to the monomeric state41. Consequently, proteins like DNaseI bind to both monomers and pointed ends with high affinity. Nevertheless, some members of the tropomodulin protein family, including TMOD1, can block pointed end polymerization without binding G-actin42. The specificity of TMOD1 most likely arises from multivalent interaction of TMOD1 with both actin subunits that are found at the pointed end. Similarly, SH3BGRL2, a more recently identified pointed end binding protein, binds between the interface of two actin units, with no evidence that it binds to G-actin22. In addition to structural considerations, G-actin and F-actin are also extracted from cells differently, with G-actin largely removed from cells after treatment with low concentrations of saponin19. In contrast, F-actin is mostly unchanged after extraction, presumably because the polymerized actin population is large and interconnected. In the current study, we noted clear differences between probes for G-actin and for pointed ends in intact cells, which demonstrated that the pointed-end probes are not just detecting G-actin. In addition, saponin extraction nearly eliminated signal from the RPEL1-EGFP G-actin probe, while EGFP-TMOD1 was depleted from the cell body and stereocilia shaft, but not from the tip. Thus, the idea of pointed ends, and thus short actin filaments, being at stereocilia tips and along the stereocilia shaft relies on the combined results of multiple probes in intact and extracted cells.

G-actin at stereocilia tips

Actin polymerization is most evident at stereocilia tips and, correspondingly, we found that G-actin detected by the RPEL1-EGFP probe is also enriched at stereocilia tips. It is unclear if G-actin is trafficked to tips or if it is enriched by trapping mechanism after diffusing to tips, but the RPEL1-EGFP signal is almost always absent after a short extraction with saponin. The RPEL1 protein has a relatively low affinity for G-actin, so some of the signal decrease could be dissociation of the probe. However, G-actin is well-known to be diffusible so it is more likely that the pool of G-actin at stereocilia tips is not tightly associated with existing F-actin structures or other bound proteins. This view is supported by JLA20 staining, which is not evident at row 1 tips after saponin extraction suggesting that the pool of actin marked by RPEL1-EGFP was lost.

Interestingly, JLA20 did stain the tips of row 2 stereocilia from P5 mice, but not P9 mice, after saponin treatment, revealing that some G-actin is resistant to extraction. JLA20 also stained the tips of microvilli on the apical surface of hair cells (Fig. 2c). These microvilli are shrinking and will be lost as the stereocilia bundle develops. Similarly, row 2 stereocilia lengths are also decreasing from P0-P9 as bundle architecture is refined4, while row 1 stereocilia length remains constant. Stereocilia shortening and microvilli disassembly likely involve the actin severing proteins ADF and cofilin, which localize to the tips of row 2 stereocilia and apical surface microvilli. In addition, row 2 stereocilia and microvilli are both longer on hair cells lacking ADF and cofilin activity9. These observations suggest that the anchored G-actin detected by JLA20 could be a transient by-product of ADF/cofilin mediated actin disassembly in the tips of protrusions. It is unclear whether the liberation of G-actin during shortening contributes to concurrent tip filament formation or row 2 stereocilia widening.

Conclusion

Stereocilia morphogenesis is required for normal hearing and balance, and it is also a fascinating case study in how cells generate complex shapes. Here, we provided evidence of short actin filaments in developing stereocilia, both at the tips and along the widening shaft. We propose that these short filaments are intermediates that mature into the long actin filaments that have long been known to comprise the stereocilia actin core.

Methods

Experimental Model and Subject Details

Inbred C57BL/6 mice were used for all experiments. All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Indiana University - Indianapolis. The day of birth is referred to as postnatal day 0 (P0). Both male and female mice were used for all experiments.

The i-GONAD method was performed by following the published method32,43. Guide RNA (gRNA) targeting either Myo15a or Myo3a and Myo3b were made by mixing crRNA (listed below under materials) and tracrRNA (IDT) at 100 μM in duplex buffer (IDT), heating to 94°C for 5 minutes, and cooling to room temperature. To assemble the ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex, 2.25 μl gRNA and 0.75 μl recombinant S. pyogenes Cas9 endonuclease (IDT) were mixed in 4.5 μl OPTI-MEM medium (Gibco) and incubated at room temperature for 20min. Fast Green (1 μl of a 1% filtered solution, ThermoFisher Scientific) was added to aid visualization. Female mice with copulation plugs, estimated to be 14–16 hours post mating, were anesthetized with isoflurane. The oviducts were exposed by an incision on the back of the mice. Each side of oviduct was injected with the RNP complex solution via a glass micropipette glass needle. The oviducts were electroporated with square wave pulses (8 pulses, duration 5 ms, interval 1 s, field intensity 50 V) delivered using tweezertrodes (BTX) connected to an ECM830 electroporator (BTX). The oviducts were repositioned, and the incision was closed with surgical staples. The resulting pups were genotyped by amplifying the targeted regions by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers (Myo15a_sq_F/R, Myo3a_sq_F/R or Myo3b_sq_F/R) from genomic DNA isolated from tail snips. PCR products were purified using ReliaPrep DNA Clean-up and Concentration System (Promega) and sequenced by Amplicon sequencing service from Plasmidsaurus Inc. The mutations on each pup were identified by aligning the raw sequence reads.

Materials

Oligonuceotides

crRNA targeting Myo15a: 5’-/AltR1/rCrUrArCrArArGrGrCrUrCrArCrArCrGrGrUrGrG

rGrUrUrUrUrArGrArGrCrUrArUrGrCrU/AltR2/-3’

crRNA targeting Myo3a: 5’-/AltR1/rCrArCrCrGrCrCrUrGrArArCrArCrCrUrCuCrGrU

rGrUrUrUrUrArGrArGrCrUrArUrGrCrU/AltR2/-3’

crRNA targeting Myo3b: 5’-/AltR1/rCrArUrCrUrCrGrGrUrGrGrArUrGrArUrUrCrGrG

rGrUrUrUrUrArGrArGrCrUrArUrGrCrU/AltR2/-3’

Myo15a_sq_F/R: 5’-AGCAGGGGACCTATGACA-3’ / 5’-GAACCCCTGAATAGCGTAACT-3’

Myo3a_sq_F/R: 5’-CAGGGCAAAGAAAGAGAATAAC-3’ / 5’-CATCCAGACTACAGATACATGC-3’

Myo3b_sq_F/R: 5’-GTCAAGGGCCTTCTGAGG-3’ / 5’-CCTCACGTGTTGAAGCAATAG-3’

Antibodies

Primary antibodies for immunostaining were 1:200 rabbit anti-MYO15A-Pan (PB48), 1:100 rabbit anti-MYO3A (custom antibody from Genemed Synthesis Inc., raised against the C-terminal sequence, NPYDYRRLLRKTSQRQR, of mouse MYO3A), 1:100 mouse anti-TMOD1 (ThermoFisher, Cat. # MA5–25612), 1:500 rabbit anti-GFP (Torrey Pines Biolabs, Cat. # TP401), 1:50 monoclonal mouse anti-γ-actin antibody clone 1–37 IgG purified from ascites and dye conjugated as previously described44, 1:200 Alexa Fluor 488/555 mouse anti-His (Genscript, Cat. # A01800 or # A01801) or 488 mouse anti-HA (Genscript, Cat. # A01806). Primary antibodies for immunoprobing unfixed, saponin permeabilized tissue were 100 nM mouse JLA20 from concentrated supernatant (198 μg/ml, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa) and 100 nM Alexa Fluor 488 mouse anti-β-actin (AC-15, 1.45 mg/ml, Novus Biologicals, Cat. # NB600-501). The secondary antibodies were 1:200 488/568/647 Alexa Fluor goat anti-rabbit or anti mouse IgG (ThermoFisher).

Plasmids for transfection

EGFP-β-actin was a gift from Michael Davidson (Addgene plasmid # 56421)45. pEGFP-FSCN2 was cloned by shuttling a mouse Flag-Fscn2 cDNA46 to the pDest40 vector (ThermoFisher). The pEGFP-C1-RPEL1-EGFP-3xNLS (Addgene plasmid #58469)47 and then a stop codon was inserted after EGFP by PCR mutagenesis using the Q5 Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (NEB, E0554) to eliminate expression of the nuclear localization signal (NLS). The pEGFP-C1-mTMOD1 construct was previously described48 and donated by Dr. Velia M. Fowler (University of Delaware). The pEGFP-SH3BGRL2 was synthesized from GenScript based on the DNA sequence of SH3BGRL2 (SH3 domain binding glutamate rich protein like 2) obtained on the NCBI database. The expression of untagged actin was accomplished using pActin-IRES-EGFP, a dual expression construct with a single promotor that uses an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) to drive EGFP expression. DNA encoding β-actin followed by the IRES was synthesized by GenScript and cloned into the N terminal of EGFP in the vector pcDNA3.1. Mutant β-actin plasmids, RFP-DVD-actin (DVD286,287,288AAA) and RFP-AP-actin (AP204,243EK), were previously described27 and were gifted by Dr. Dmitri S. Kudryashov (The Ohio State University). EGFP-MYO3A and EGFP-MYO3A-K50R (kinase dead) were previously described34,49. EGFP-MYO15A-2 (short isoform) was previously described10,29.

Cochlear culture and inner hair cell transfection by injectoporation

Auditory hair cells were transfected with plasmid DNA by the previously described injectoporation technique50. Briefly, the sensory epithelium was dissected from C57BL/6 mice at postnatal day 5–6 in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS, Life Technologies, Cat. # 14025092), and the cochlear duct was opened by making an incision between Reissner’s membrane and the stria vascularis. The tissue was explanted by adhering it to a plastic, tissue-culture treated dish (USA Scientific, Cat. # CC7672-3359) containing DMEM/F12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat.# 11039047) with 1 mg/ml penicillin. The culture was incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 2 hours before injectoporation was performed. For the injection step, a glass micropipette with a 2 μm tip diameter loaded with plasmid DNA (1–2 mg/ml in water) was oriented perpendicular to the IHC row. The tip of the micropipette was inserted into the space between two IHCs and pressure was supplied by a microinjector to inject plasmid into the tissue. An ECM 830 electroporator was used to deliver a series of three 15 ms 60 V square-wave electrical pulses at 1 s intervals to platinum wire electrodes that were 2 mm apart and positioned directly over the injection site. After the electroporation, the culture media was exchanged with Neurobasal-A medium (ThermoFisher Scientific, Cat. # 12349015) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine (ThermoFisher Scientific, Cat.# 25030081), 1x N-2 supplement (ThermoFisher Scientific, Cat. # 17502048), 75 mg/ml D-glucose (ThermoFisher Scientific, Cat. # 410955000), and 1 mg/ml penicillin.

Live imaging on transfected inner hair cells

Cultured explants were transfected with EGFP-actin (2 mg/ml in water) by injectoporation. Cultures were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2, then moved to a 37°C microscope incubator for live-cell acquisition. Transfected cells were imaged at 2, 4, 18 hours post injectoporation. Image stacks (0.13 μm intervals) were acquired in Airyscan mode with a Zeiss Apochromat 40x/1.0 NA water immersion objective on a Zeiss LSM 900 microscope. To avoid contamination, the cultured dishes were exchanged with fresh culture media after each live cell acquisition. Laser power for EGFP capture was 1% for time point 2 and 4 hours and 0.1% for 18 hours as EGFP-actin levels increased with time. Raw Airyscan images processed using Huygens Array Detector Deconvolutions software within the Essential software package using automatic settings. Image stacks were processed in Imaris 10.0.1 for 3D construction and in Fiji for reslicing.

Preparation of transfected inner hair cells for SIM imaging

Cultured explants were transfected with EGFP-actin or EGFP-FSCN2 (2 mg/ml in water) by injectoporation and fixed at 18 hours post-transfection with 4% formaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Cat. # 15710) in HBSS for 2 hours and stained with Alexa Fluor 568 phalloidin (0.5 U/ml, Invitrogen, Cat. # A12380) in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma, Cat. # X-100-100ML) at room temperature for 1 hour. The tectorial membrane was removed and the tissue was mounted in Prolong Diamond (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat. # P36961). Calibration slides for channel alignment were prepared using tissue stained with Alexa Fluor 488 and 568 phalloidin (0.5 U/ml, Invitrogen) following the same procedures from above.

Ultrastructural expansion microscopy (U-ExM) and immunolabeling

Ultrastructural expansion microscopy (U-ExM) was performed based on protocols adapted from previously described methods51,52. Cochlear tissue was fixed at room temperature for 30 min. After fixation, tissue was washed with PBS and transferred to 1.4% formaldehyde/2% acrylamide (FA/AA) in PBS at 37°C for overnight incubation. The FA/AA solution was removed on the second day followed by 3 times wash of PBS. The tissue was then incubated in monomer solution (19% w/w sodium acrylate, 10% v/v acrylamide, 2% v/v N, N’-methylenebisacrylamide in PBS) for 90 minutes at room temperature. After incubation, the cochlear tissue was transferred to a petri dish lid. Excess monomer solution was removed from the surrounding area of the tissue. Subsequently, 2.5 μl of 10% N,N,N′,N′-Tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED) and 10% ammonium persulphate solution were added to 45 μl monomer solution, which was mixed thoroughly, and 30 μl was quickly pipetted onto the dish before being mounted under a 12 mm round coverslip. After polymerization, the resulting hydrogel was then incubated at 37°C humidified chamber for 1 hour before adding room temperature denaturation buffer (200 mM sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 200 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris, pH 9) for 15 min. The gel was then detached from the coverslip, transferred to a new denaturation buffer, and denatured at 95°C for 1 hour. The denatured gel was transferred in a 150 mm petri dish filled with 20 ml MilliQ water and placed on a 50 rpm shaker for 30 minutes. The gel was further expanded by replacing water two more times every 30 minutes. The expanded gel was then shrunk by washing with PBS for 15 minutes. The shrunken gel was then incubated with 0.2 mg/ml Alexa Fluor 546 succinimidyl ester (NHS-ester, Thermo Fisher, Cat. # A20102) for 1 hour before washing 3 times with PBS. The gel was incubated with blocking buffer (2.5% BSA in PBS, 0.5% Triton-X-100) for 1 hour blocking at room temperature on the shaker and washed with PBS 3 times before antibody staining. Primary antibodies were prepared in the staining buffer (1% BSA in PBS, 0.2% Triton-X-100) and incubated with the gel overnight at room temperature on the shaker. The gel was washed with PBS 3 times before being incubated with secondary antibodies in PBS for 3 hours at room temperature on the shaker. Following the incubation, the stained gel was washed with PBS and then transferred to the 10 cm petri dish filled with water, undergoing a second round of expansion during 3 subsequent water washes. The gels were trimmed, and mounted in a glass-bottom dish under a glass coverslip.

EGFP was detected by rabbit-anti-GFP primary antibody followed by the incubation of the secondary antibody goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488. His-TMOD1 was incubated with unfixed tissue at P5. After probing, the tissue was fixed and processed as described above. Anti-TMOD1, anti-MYO15A-Pan, or anti-MYO3A antibodies were incubated with gels for 24 hours at room temperature on the shaker, washed, and incubated with the secondary goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 antibody for 3 hours. The whole expanded tissue was stained by Alexa Fluor 546 conjugated NHS-ester to label total protein.

Expression and purification of His-TMOD1, HA-TMOD1, and His-CAPZ

The expression construct pReceiver-B01-mTmod1 and purified His-TMOD1 were gifted by Dr. Alla Kostyukova (Washington State). HA-Tmod1 has an N-terminal 6xHis tag followed by a fusion of the “spaghetti monster (sm)” HA tag53 with mTmod1. This construct was generated by amplifying the smHA sequence from a plasmid pCAG-smFP-HA (Addgene #59759) with forward primer (5’-ccatcaccatcattcgaaggaaggtACCATGTACCCTTATGATGTGC-3’) and reverse primer (5’-gtctgtaggacatggtaccgcctgccccAGCGTAGTCCGGGACATC-3’). The amplified product was then assembled with EcoRI-digested pReceiver-B01-mTmod1 using the NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly Kit (New England Biolabs, Cat. # E5520S). The entire plasmid was sequenced using nanopore sequencing (sequencing performed by Plasmidsaurus). Competent E. coli Rosetta (DE3) pLysS cells were transformed with the His-Tmod1 or HA-Tmod1 plasmid. Successful transformants were selected by incubating bacteria at 37°C on LB agar plates containing ampicillin. A single colony was used to grow a 1-liter culture in LB-ampicillin medium, which at OD620nm 0.6 was induced to express protein with 0.4 mM IPTG and further incubated for 5 hours at 37°C. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and re-suspended in 20 ml lysis buffer (50 mM Na-phosphate (pH 6.8), 300 mM NaCl, 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (BME), 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 1 tablet cOmplete protease inhibitor, 20 mM imidazole, 10% glycerol). The re-suspended cells were sonicated and then centrifuged to remove cellular debris. The supernatant was loaded onto a Ni-NTA column which was pre-equilibrated with the wash buffer (50 mM Na-phosphate (pH 6.8), 300 mM NaCl, 5 mM BME, 1 mM PMSF, 20 mM imidazole, 10% glycerol). After washing the column with 50 ml of wash buffer, the His-TMOD1 protein was then eluted with 70 ml elution buffer with a gradient of 20–250 mM imidazole (50 mM Na-phosphate (pH 6.8), 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM BME, 1 mM PMSF, 10% glycerol, 250 mM imidazole for the maximum concentration). The elution was collected in 90 fractions. The purity of the His-TMOD1 or HA-TMOD1 fractions was assessed by SDS-PAGE. Fractions with over 95% purity were pooled together and dialyzed overnight in the storage buffer (20 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 10% glycerol). The concentration of the dialyzed His-TMOD1 or HA-TMOD1 was measured, and the aliquots were stored at −80°C. The His-CAPZ was as previously described9.

Purified protein probing assay

Cochlea were dissected in HBSS and the lateral wall was removed prior to permeabilization in cytoskeleton buffer (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 138 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 3 mM EGTA, 1% bovine serum albumin) with 0.05% saponin. Purified proteins were included at the follow concentrations: 714 nM His-TMOD1 (6XHis-tagged mouse tropomodulin-1) to label F-actin pointed-ends, 3.6 μM Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated DNase I (deoxyribonuclease I, Thermo Fisher, Cat. # D12371), or 400 nM His-CAPZ (mouse CAPZB and 6XHis-tagged CAPZA1) to label barbed ends of actin filaments. Samples were incubated in this solution for 5 minutes at room temperature before being washed by cytoskeleton buffer without saponin. Samples were then fixed with 4% formaldehyde in HBSS for 2 hours at room temperature. Samples were rinsed with PBS and the tectorial membrane and Reissner’s membrane were removed from the fixed tissues. Samples then were incubated overnight at 4°C with 5 ng/ml Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated anti-His antibody and 1 U/ml Alexa Fluor 568 phalloidin in PBS with 0.01% Triton X-100. Tissues were rinsed by PBS 3 times and mounted in Prolong Diamond for imaging. To visualize His-TMOD1 and His-CAPZ in EGFP-Myosin transfected cells, 5 ng/ml Alexa Fluor 647 conjugated anti-His antibody was used instead. Samples labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated DNaseI were incubated with 1 U/ml Alexa Fluor 568 phalloidin in PBS with 0.01% Triton X-100 at room temperature for 1 hour before mounting. Apical IHCs were defined as being at a cochlear location approximately 30% of the distance from the apical end.

Pre-fix antibody labeling

Freshly dissected sensory epithelia were permeabilized in cytoskeleton buffer with 0.05% saponin, subsequently mixed with 100 nM JLA20 or FITC-AC15. Samples were incubated in this solution for 5 minutes at room temperature before being washed by cytoskeleton buffer without saponin. Samples were then fixed with 4% formaldehyde in HBSS for 2 hours at room temperature. Samples were rinsed with PBS and the tectorial membrane and Reissner’s membrane were removed from the fixed tissues. Samples were then incubated overnight at 4°C with 1:200 secondary antibody goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (to detect JLA20) and 1 U/ml Alexa Fluor 568 phalloidin in PBS with 0.01% Triton X-100. Tissues were rinsed with PBS 3 times and mounted in Prolong Diamond for imaging.

Permeabilization of transfected cells

Explants were transferred from culture dishes to HBSS 18 hours post-transfection with RPEL1-EGFP or EGFP-TMOD1, then rinsed in cytoskeleton buffer with 0.05% saponin and immediately fixed with 4% formaldehyde in HBSS for 2 hours at room temperature.

Latrunculin A treatment assay

The cultured explants were categorized into 3 groups: DMSO, LatA (Latrunculin A, Sigma, Cat. # 428026), and washout. After 1-hour pre-culture, solutions from the DMSO group were exchanged with Neurobasal-A medium containing DMSO (1:1000) at a final concentration of 0.1%. The solutions from both LatA and washout group were exchanged with Neurobasal-A medium containing LatA (1:1000) with a final concentration of 1 μM. After a 1-hour incubation at 37°C and 5% CO2, the DMSO and LatA groups were then harvested and transferred to the cytoskeleton buffer for His-TMOD1 probing assay described above. The explants from the washout group were washed with warm Neurobasal-A medium 6 times to decrease the LatA concentration to be less than 0.01 μM. The dishes were further cultured for 2 hours before performing His-TMOD1 probing assay.

High salt stripping assay

Cochlea were dissected from C57BL/6 mice at postnatal day 5 and lateral walls were removed to expose the sensory epithelia. One cochlea was transferred to a high-salt buffer (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 138 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 3 mM EGTA, 1% bovine serum albumin, 500 mM NaCl and 0.2% saponin for 2 minutes incubation at room temperature, while the other cochlea was transferred to the same buffer without NaCl and 0.05% saponin for 2 minutes incubation as a control. After high-salt extraction, tissues were washed twice with cytoskeleton buffer containing 0.05% saponin before being probed for 5 minutes at room temperature with His-TMOD1 or His-CAPZ. Samples were then washed with cytoskeleton buffer without saponin and fixed with 4% formaldehyde at room temperature for 2 hours. The subsequent steps after fixation were as described previously in the purified protein probing assay. In the high salt experiment, the anti-His antibody was Alexa Fluor 555 conjugated and the phalloidin was Alexa Fluor 488.

Orthovanadate treatment assay

Dissected P5 organs of Corti were transferred to cytoskeleton buffer (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 138 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 3 mM EGTA, 1% bovine serum albumin) and 0.05% saponin with or without 4 mM sodium orthovanadate54 (New England Biolabs, Cat. # P0758S). After a 1-minute incubation, His-TMOD1 (714 nM) was added to the solution and incubated at room temperature for 5 minutes. Samples were then washed with cytoskeleton buffer without saponin and fixed with 4% formaldehyde at room temperature for 2 hours. The subsequent steps after fixation were as described previously in the purified protein probing assay.

Fluorescence Microscopy

Slides in Figs. 3d, 4, 5, 7f, 7h, Supplementary Figs. 1, 2, 3a, 5c, 5f, 6a were imaged with a Leica Plan Apo 63x/1.40 NA oil immersion objective on Leica SP8 inverted confocal microscope operating in resonant scanning mode (Leica Microsystems, RRID:SCR_018169). Images were captured using Leica Application Suite X (Leica Microsystem, RRID:SCR_013673) and deconvolved using Leica LIGHTNING deconvolution with the default settings. Slides in Figs. 2, 3a, 6, 7b, 7d, Supplementary Figs. 3bc, 4a, 5e were imaged with a Zeiss Plan-Apochromat 63x/1.4 NA oil immersion objective on a Zeiss LSM 900 microscope with an Airyscan detector. Raw Airyscan images were processed in Zen software using default settings. U-ExM samples were imaged with a Leica HC FLUOTAR L 25x/0.95 NA water immersion objective on the Leica SP8. Slides in Supplementary Fig. 5d were imaged using a Nikon Apochromat TIRF 100x/1.49 NA oil immersion objective on a Nikon Ti2-E with a spinning disk confocal scan head (CSU-X1, Yokogawa) and captured on a sCMOS camera (Prime95B, Teledyne Photometrics). Structured illumination (SIM) images were acquired at 26 to 30°C with a 63x/1.4 NA oil immersion lens on a Zeiss (Oberkochen, Germany) lattice-based Elyra 7 microscope with dual PCO.edge 4.2 sCMOS cameras for detection. Illumination grid selection and z-spacing was guided by the software and kept consistent across images. Post-acquisition processing was performed with software-recommended standard filtering for the 488-nm channel, without baseline subtraction and with “scale to raw” checked. Contrast was manually adjusted to retain both dim and bright structures due to the high dynamic range of the phalloidin signal. Verification of channel alignment was carried out as previously described4. ImageJ (NIH, RRID:SCR_002285) was used to adjust colors and display values for the images presented in figures.

Image analysis

3D reconstructions in figure 1 were made with Imaris software. All images for fluorescent quantification were analyzed using ImageJ.

Sample selection for fluorescence quantification

Samples where stereocilia were orientated parallel to the coverslip such that the full length was captured within a z-stack that was less than 0.5 microns thick were chosen for analysis. Maximum intensity projections of selected stacks covering the entire stereocilia length were created for individual cell.

Line scan profiling on stereocilia

Line scans were drawn from the top of stereocilia down the center of stereocilia. In Figs. 2b, 2d, 3b, 3c, the peak level in green channel was set as 0 on x axis and the fluorescence intensity was normalized to the maximal fluorescence intensity of row 1. In Fig. 3g, the stereocilia tip was defined as being the point where phalloidin intensity reached the mean value of fluorescence in the tip region. The fluorescence intensity was normalized to the average fluorescence intensity of line scan values in each channel. In Fig. 6c, the peak level in RFP channel was set as 0 on axis and the fluorescence intensity was normalized to the maximal intensity in each channel.

Tip or shaft signal analysis

The signals at stereocilia tips were collected by drawing a 10×10 pixels circle (0.4 μm in diameter). The shaft signals in stereocilia during postnatal development were collected by drawing a line (around 1 μm) along the shaft. Mean value of either circle or line was measured on the maximum intensity projection. In Fig. 2e, the fluorescence intensity of JLA20 was normalized to the average intensity of the cell border by cochlea. In Fig. 4b, His-TMOD1 signals were normalized to the average fluorescence intensity of row 1 stereocilia from DMSO-treated samples. In Figs. 4df, His-TMOD1 signals were normalized to the average fluorescence intensity of row 1 stereocilia at P3. In Fig. 5, the shaft signals were collected by drawing a 10×10 pixel circle (0.45 μm in diameter) at a point of 0.45 μm below stereocilia tip. Mean value was measured and normalized to the average fluorescence intensity of His labeling in control cells. The shaft level of EGFP or His labeling in each stereocilium was determined by multiplying the average shaft intensity by the width of the stereocilium. In Fig. 7c, His-TMOD1 signals were normalized to the average fluorescence intensity of row 1 stereocilia in control. In Fig. 7e, HA-TMOD1 levels were normalized to the average fluorescence intensity of cell junctions in each image acquisition. In Figs. 7g and 7i, the circle size for collecting tip signals was increased to 14×14 pixels (0.6 μm in diameter). EGFP signals were normalized to the average EGFP levels of stereocilia tips in all transfected cells. His-TMOD1 signals were normalized to the average fluorescence intensity of stereocilia tips in control cells.

Stereocilia width measurement

The stereocilia width was defined by measuring full width at half maximum (FWHM) at a position 0.45 μm below stereocilia tip. The FWHM was measured using a nonlinear curve fitting with the Gaussian function in OriginLab. The measurements for samples imaged by expansion microscopy in Supplementary Fig. 6 were performed as follows: The “Fire” LUT function was applied to the maximum intensity projection. The image display range was set from 0 to 40% of the maximum displayed value. A line was drawn perpendicular to the stereocilia, across pixels with saturated intensity (at least 40% of the maximum value). The line length was measured at a position 1.41 μm below stereocilia tip.

Quantification and statistical analysis

The data were collected from at least 3 wildtype cochleae or 3 mutant littermates, at least 5 cells per cochlea, and 3–7 stereocilia per cell. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 10. SuperPlots55 were applied to present the data with column table format from GraphPad. Smaller circles represent stereocilia or cells and larger circles represent mice or cochleae in all graphs. Each color corresponds to a replicate unit (mouse or cochlea as indicated). For plots in Figs. 5bd and 7g,I, each symbol corresponds to a stereocilium. Stereocilia from the same cell are represented by identical color and shape. Student’s t test was used for pairwise comparisons. Two-way ANOVA was used to determine significant differences in Fig. 3c. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Significance levels used were as follows: n.s., not significant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01, ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Pennsylvania Lions Hearing Research Grant (C.M.Y), R01DC011034 (P.G.B.G), R01DC002368 (P.G.B.G), R01DC018827 (J.E.B), and R01DC015495 (B.J.P).

Footnotes

Additional Declarations: There is NO Competing Interest.

Reference

  • 1.Tilney L. G., Derosier D. J. & Mulroy M. J. The organization of actin filaments in the stereocilia of cochlear hair cells. J Cell Biol 86, 244–259 (1980). 10.1083/jcb.86.1.244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schneider M. E., Belyantseva I. A., Azevedo R. B. & Kachar B. Rapid renewal of auditory hair bundles. Nature 418, 837–838 (2002). 10.1038/418837a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Krey J. F. et al. Mechanotransduction-Dependent Control of Stereocilia Dimensions and Row Identity in Inner Hair Cells. Curr Biol 30, 442–454 e447 (2020). 10.1016/j.cub.2019.11.076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Krey J. F. et al. Control of stereocilia length during development of hair bundles. PLoS Biol 21, e3001964 (2023). 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rzadzinska A. K., Schneider M. E., Davies C., Riordan G. P. & Kachar B. An actin molecular treadmill and myosins maintain stereocilia functional architecture and self-renewal. J Cell Biol 164, 887–897 (2004). 10.1083/jcb.200310055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang D. S. et al. Multi-isotope imaging mass spectrometry reveals slow protein turnover in hair-cell stereocilia. Nature 481, 520–524 (2012). 10.1038/nature10745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Narayanan P. et al. Length regulation of mechanosensitive stereocilia depends on very slow actin dynamics and filament-severing proteins. Nat Commun 6, 6855 (2015). 10.1038/ncomms7855 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Drummond M. C. et al. Live-cell imaging of actin dynamics reveals mechanisms of stereocilia length regulation in the inner ear. Nat Commun 6, 6873 (2015). 10.1038/ncomms7873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McGrath J. et al. Actin at stereocilia tips is regulated by mechanotransduction and ADF/cofilin. Curr Biol 31, 1141–1153 e1147 (2021). 10.1016/j.cub.2020.12.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Belyantseva I. A., Boger E. T. & Friedman T. B. Myosin XVa localizes to the tips of inner ear sensory cell stereocilia and is essential for staircase formation of the hair bundle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 13958–13963 (2003). 10.1073/pnas.2334417100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Belyantseva I. A. et al. Myosin-XVa is required for tip localization of whirlin and differential elongation of hair-cell stereocilia. Nat Cell Biol 7, 148–156 (2005). 10.1038/ncb1219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Manor U. et al. Regulation of stereocilia length by myosin XVa and whirlin depends on the actin-regulatory protein Eps8. Curr Biol 21, 167–172 (2011). 10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tadenev A. L. D. et al. GPSM2-GNAI Specifies the Tallest Stereocilia and Defines Hair Bundle Row Identity. Curr Biol 29, 921–934 e924 (2019). 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mauriac S. A. et al. Defective Gpsm2/Galpha(i3) signalling disrupts stereocilia development and growth cone actin dynamics in Chudley-McCullough syndrome. Nat Commun 8, 14907 (2017). 10.1038/ncomms14907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schneider M. E. et al. A new compartment at stereocilia tips defined by spatial and temporal patterns of myosin IIIa expression. J Neurosci 26, 10243–10252 (2006). 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2812-06.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lelli A. et al. Class III myosins shape the auditory hair bundles by limiting microvilli and stereocilia growth. J Cell Biol 212, 231–244 (2016). 10.1083/jcb.201509017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ebrahim S. et al. Stereocilia-staircase spacing is influenced by myosin III motors and their cargos espin-1 and espin-like. Nat Commun 7, 10833 (2016). 10.1038/ncomms10833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Roy P. & Perrin B. J. The stable actin core of mechanosensory stereocilia features continuous turnover of actin cross-linkers. Mol Biol Cell 29, 1856–1865 (2018). 10.1091/mbc.E18-03-0196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lee C. W. et al. Dynamic localization of G-actin during membrane protrusion in neuronal motility. Curr Biol 23, 1046–1056 (2013). 10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mouilleron S., Guettler S., Langer C. A., Treisman R. & McDonald N. Q. Molecular basis for G-actin binding to RPEL motifs from the serum response factor coactivator MAL. EMBO J 27, 3198–3208 (2008). 10.1038/emboj.2008.235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rao J. N., Madasu Y. & Dominguez R. Mechanism of actin filament pointed-end capping by tropomodulin. Science 345, 463–467 (2014). 10.1126/science.1256159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li N. et al. Structural basis of membrane skeleton organization in red blood cells. Cell 186, 1912–1929 e1918 (2023). 10.1016/j.cell.2023.03.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Morrison S. S. & Dawson J. F. A high-throughput assay shows that DNase-I binds actin monomers and polymers with similar affinity. Anal Biochem 364, 159–164 (2007). 10.1016/j.ab.2007.02.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Caldwell J. E., Heiss S. G., Mermall V. & Cooper J. A. Effects of CapZ, an actin capping protein of muscle, on the polymerization of actin. Biochemistry 28, 8506–8514 (1989). 10.1021/bi00447a036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fujiwara I., Zweifel M. E., Courtemanche N. & Pollard T. D. Latrunculin A Accelerates Actin Filament Depolymerization in Addition to Sequestering Actin Monomers. Curr Biol 28, 3183–3192 e3182 (2018). 10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zahm J. A. et al. The bacterial effector VopL organizes actin into filament-like structures. Cell 155, 423–434 (2013). 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kudryashova E., Ankita, Ulrichs, H., Shekhar, S. & Kudryashov, D. S. Pointed-end processive elongation of actin filaments by Vibrio effectors VopF and VopL. Sci Adv 8, eadc9239 (2022). 10.1126/sciadv.adc9239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Joel P. B., Fagnant P. M. & Trybus K. M. Expression of a nonpolymerizable actin mutant in Sf9 cells. Biochemistry 43, 11554–11559 (2004). 10.1021/bi048899a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fang Q. et al. The 133-kDa N-terminal domain enables myosin 15 to maintain mechanotransducing stereocilia and is essential for hearing. Elife 4 (2015). 10.7554/eLife.08627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Goodno C. C. & Taylor E. W. Inhibition of actomyosin ATPase by vanadate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 79, 21–25 (1982). 10.1073/pnas.79.1.21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pacentine I. V. & Barr-Gillespie P. G. Cy3-ATP labeling of unfixed, permeabilized mouse hair cells. Sci Rep 11, 23855 (2021). 10.1038/s41598-021-03365-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ohtsuka M. et al. i-GONAD: a robust method for in situ germline genome engineering using CRISPR nucleases. Genome Biol 19, 25 (2018). 10.1186/s13059-018-1400-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang A. et al. Association of unconventional myosin MYO15 mutations with human nonsyndromic deafness DFNB3. Science 280, 1447–1451 (1998). 10.1126/science.280.5368.1447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Quintero O. A. et al. Intermolecular autophosphorylation regulates myosin IIIa activity and localization in parallel actin bundles. J Biol Chem 285, 35770–35782 (2010). 10.1074/jbc.M110.144360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vogel S. K., Petrasek Z., Heinemann F. & Schwille P. Myosin motors fragment and compact membrane-bound actin filaments. Elife 2, e00116 (2013). 10.7554/eLife.00116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Miller L., Phillips M. & Reisler E. Polymerization of G-actin by myosin subfragment 1. J Biol Chem 263, 1996–2002 (1988). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fievez S., Pantaloni D. & Carlier M. F. Kinetics of myosin subfragment-1-induced condensation of G-actin into oligomers, precursors in the assembly of F-actin-S1. Role of the tightly bound metal ion and ATP hydrolysis. Biochemistry 36, 11837–11842 (1997). 10.1021/bi971205w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Moreland Z. G. et al. Myosin-driven Nucleation of Actin Filaments Drives Stereocilia Development Critical for Hearing. BioRxiv (2021). 10.1101/2021.07.09.451618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gong R. et al. Structural basis for tunable control of actin dynamics by myosin-15 in mechanosensory stereocilia. Sci Adv 8, eabl4733 (2022). 10.1126/sciadv.abl4733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wilson C. A. et al. Myosin II contributes to cell-scale actin network treadmilling through network disassembly. Nature 465, 373–377 (2010). 10.1038/nature08994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Carman P. J., Barrie K. R., Rebowski G. & Dominguez R. Structures of the free and capped ends of the actin filament. Science 380, 1287–1292 (2023). 10.1126/science.adg6812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Weber A., Pennise C. R., Babcock G. G. & Fowler V. M. Tropomodulin caps the pointed ends of actin filaments. J Cell Biol 127, 1627–1635 (1994). 10.1083/jcb.127.6.1627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sato M. et al. Improved Genome Editing via Oviductal Nucleic Acids Delivery (i-GONAD): Protocol Steps and Additional Notes. Methods Mol Biol 2631, 325–340 (2023). 10.1007/978-1-0716-2990-1_14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Perrin B. J., Sonnemann K. J. & Ervasti J. M. beta-actin and gamma-actin are each dispensable for auditory hair cell development but required for Stereocilia maintenance. PLoS Genet 6, e1001158 (2010). 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rizzo M. A., Davidson M. W. & Piston D. W. Fluorescent protein tracking and detection: fluorescent protein structure and color variants. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2009, pdb top63 (2009). 10.1101/pdb.top63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Perrin B. J. et al. beta-Actin and fascin-2 cooperate to maintain stereocilia length. J Neurosci 33, 8114–8121 (2013). 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0238-13.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Belin B. J., Cimini B. A., Blackburn E. H. & Mullins R. D. Visualization of actin filaments and monomers in somatic cell nuclei. Mol Biol Cell 24, 982–994 (2013). 10.1091/mbc.E12-09-0685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Vasilescu C. et al. Recessive TMOD1 mutation causes childhood cardiomyopathy. Commun Biol 7, 7 (2024). 10.1038/s42003-023-05670-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Quintero O. A. et al. Myosin 3A kinase activity is regulated by phosphorylation of the kinase domain activation loop. J Biol Chem 288, 37126–37137 (2013). 10.1074/jbc.M113.511014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Xiong W., Wagner T., Yan L., Grillet N. & Muller U. Using injectoporation to deliver genes to mechanosensory hair cells. Nat Protoc 9, 2438–2449 (2014). 10.1038/nprot.2014.168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wassie A. T., Zhao Y. & Boyden E. S. Expansion microscopy: principles and uses in biological research. Nat Methods 16, 33–41 (2019). 10.1038/s41592-018-0219-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Liffner B. & Absalon S. Expansion Microscopy Reveals Plasmodium falciparum Blood-Stage Parasites Undergo Anaphase with A Chromatin Bridge in the Absence of Mini-Chromosome Maintenance Complex Binding Protein. Microorganisms 9 (2021). 10.3390/microorganisms9112306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Viswanathan S. et al. High-performance probes for light and electron microscopy. Nat Methods 12, 568–576 (2015). 10.1038/nmeth.3365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Caprara G. A., Mecca A. A. & Peng A. W. Decades-old model of slow adaptation in sensory hair cells is not supported in mammals. Sci Adv 6, eabb4922 (2020). 10.1126/sciadv.abb4922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lord S. J., Velle K. B., Mullins R. D. & Fritz-Laylin L. K. SuperPlots: Communicating reproducibility and variability in cell biology. J Cell Biol 219 (2020). 10.1083/jcb.202001064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

Articles from Research Square are provided here courtesy of American Journal Experts

RESOURCES