Abstract
Background: Metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a progressive liver disorder that possesses metabolic dysfunction and shows steatohepatitis. Although the number of patients is globally increasing and many clinical studies have developed medicine for MASLD, most of the studies have failed due to low efficacy. One reason for this failure is the lack of appropriate animal disease models that reflect human MASLD to evaluate the potency of candidate drugs. Methods: We developed a novel choline-deficient and 0.11%-methionine-added high-fat diet (CDAHFD)-based (MASH) diet that can induce murine metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) without severe body weight loss. We performed kinetic analyses post-feeding and proposed an appropriate timing of MASH pathogenesis by quantitatively analyzing steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis. Results: This MASH diet induced liver fibrosis earlier than the conventional CDAHFD model. In brief, lipid accumulation, inflammation, and fibrosis started after 1 week from feeding. Lipid accumulation increased until 8 weeks and declined thereafter; on the other hand, liver fibrosis showed continuous progression. Additionally, immune cells, especially myeloid cells, specifically accumulated and induced inflammation in the initiation stage of MASH. Conclusions: The novel MASH diet promotes the dynamics of lipid deposition and fibrosis in the liver, similar to human MASH pathophysiology. Furthermore, immune-cell-derived inflammation possibly contributes to the initiation of MASH pathogenesis. We propose this model can be the new pre-clinical MASH model to discover the drugs against human MASH by evaluating the interaction between parenchymal and non-parenchymal cells.
Keywords: burned-out MASH, CDAHFD, hepatic inflammation, MASLD, mitochondrial dysfunction
1. Introduction
Metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction associated steatohepatitis (MASH) are the current terms for liver disease related to metabolic dysfunction and steatosis that have been previously described as non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLDs) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), respectively [1]. The current epidemiology estimates that 30% of the global population has MASLD, and approximately 20% of MASLD patients have MASH [1]. A clinical problem in MASH is that it may develop into cirrhosis and MASH-related hepatocellular carcinoma [2]. Although many clinical studies have been investigated to develop compounds to treat MASH, most have failed because of poor efficacy [3,4]. One reason for this clinical failure is the lack of pre-clinical animal models that mimic human MASH and predict its efficacy. To address this, many studies have been demonstrated to develop appropriate animal models for human MASH [5]. A recent study ranked these models based on their similarity to human MASH but concluded that none perfectly replicate it [6]. The Western diet (WD) better reflects the metabolic aspects of the disease. In contrast, the choline-deficient diet mimics the fibrosis-promoting component, highlighting the importance of choosing an appropriate diet based on the purpose.
The choline-deficient and 0.1%-methionine-added high-fat diet (CDAHFD) was developed as a MASH model to analyze the pathogenesis of human MASH [7]. CDAHFD has a milder effect on body weight changes but develops into fibrosis rapidly compared to the high-fat diet (HFD). The NAFLD activity score (NAS) and fibrosis stage are semi-quantitative scoring systems that evaluate the grades of steatosis (score 0–3), lobular inflammation (score 0–3), ballooning (score 0–2), and fibrosis (stage 0–4) in human MASLD and murine MASLD models [8,9]. The CDAHFD causes score 2 steatosis within 1 week based on oxidative-stress-induced mitochondrial dysfunction [10,11,12]. In this model, fibrosis is observed after 6 weeks of feeding [7]. Tumor formation can be seen after 36 weeks with nodular regenerative hyperplasia, adenomas, and hepatocellular carcinoma [13]. In addition, CDAHFD-fed humanized-liver chimeric mice show similar histological changes with human MASH patients [14]. These reports indicate that the CDAHFD is suitable for analyzing mitochondrial dysfunction and useful for investigating the early stage of human MASH. However, CDAHFD feeding inhibits weight gain, and this phenotype is apart from human MASH pathophysiology [6,7].
Immune cells influence the pathogenesis of MASH through inflammation and tissue repair [15]. Although neutrophils infiltrate the liver and induce inflammation in the early stages of MASH, they do not contribute to fibrogenesis [16,17,18,19,20]. In addition, B cell subsets have different properties and opposite contributions to the pathogenesis of MASH [21,22,23]. Many studies have focused on specific cells at particular stages, but since MASH is progressive, the role of immune cells may vary throughout its progression. This gap may lead to the misinterpretation of experimental results and drug efficacy predictions. Therefore, it is essential to trace the comprehensive immune cell transition in MASH pathogenesis and to identify the appropriate period for assessing the contribution of immune cells.
In this study, we developed a novel MASH diet with some changes from the ingredients of the previously reported CDAHFD. Briefly, we added linoleic acid to induce inflammation and reduce the fat–calorie ratio to avoid body weight reduction. We showed the impact of our MASH diet on steatosis induction, inflammation, fibrosis, and serum components over time to identify the optimal period to analyze MASH development. Lipid accumulation decreased after 24 weeks, like burned-out MASH in humans. Furthermore, we provide insights into the immune cell typing in the MASH diet by cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF) analysis and identify the rapid accumulation of myeloid cells in the liver. These results indicate the benefit of our MASH diet as a pre-clinical animal model to investigate the drugs for MASH treatment.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals and Experimental Protocol for the MASH Diet Model
Specific pathogen-free 5 weeks old male C57BL/6J mice were purchased from Japan SLC, Inc. (Shizuoka, Japan), and after 1 week of acclimation, mice were randomly divided into two groups (up to 3 mice per cage): the Chow group was fed a commercial standard diet (Chow; #CE-2, CLEA, Shizuoka, Japan); the MASH group was fed a modified choline-deficient and 0.11%-methionine-added high-fat diet (CDAHFD) (MASH; #OYC-NASH1, Oriental Yeast Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). At 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 weeks after the feeding, the animals were weighed, euthanized by cervical dislocation, and the samples were collected for analysis (Figure 1). Blood was collected by cardiac puncture, clotted at room temperature for 30 min (#365978, BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), centrifuged (6000× g, 4 °C, 90 s), and stored at −80 °C. For real-time PCR and Western blot analysis, small pieces of liver tissue were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. For the histological analysis, the liver tissue was also fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (#060–01667, Fujifilm Wako, Osaka, Japan). All mice were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions (23 ± 2 °C, 55 ± 5% humidity, 12/12 h light/dark cycle) in the Animal Resource Center for Infectious Diseases at Osaka University. All animal experiments were performed with approval from the Animal Research Committee of the Research Institute for Microbial Disease, Osaka University.
Nutritional Composition of the MASH Diet
We modified the ingredients of the CDAHFD and generated the MASH diet. The ingredients of the MASH diet are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Nutrition Facts | MASH Diet: OYC-NASH1 |
---|---|
Moisture | 9.0% |
Crude protein | 17.2% |
Crude fat | 28.2% |
Coarse ash content | 3.0% |
Coarse fiber | 4.7% |
Nitrogen free extract | 38.0% |
Calories | 474.2 kcal/100 g of the diet |
Saturated fatty acid | 34.4% of total fatty acid |
Monounsaturated fatty acid | 29.3% of total fatty acid |
Polyunsaturated fatty acid | 36.2% of total fatty acid |
Methionine | 0.11% |
Choline | 0% |
2.2. Isolation of Immune Cells from Blood and the Liver
Red blood cells were removed by adding ACK lysing buffer (#A1049201, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to the blood and incubating at RT for 2 min to isolate immune cells. Then, the cells were washed twice with CyFACS buffer (0.1% BSA + 2 mM EDTA + 0.1% Sodium Azide made with 1 × PBS) and resuspended in CyFACS buffer for CyTOF analysis. For immune cell isolation from the liver, the liver was finely chopped on ice and suspended in Buffer 1 (10% FBS + 25 mM HEPES made with RPMI-1640 with Glutamax (#61870-036, Thermo Fisher Scientific, pH 7.4). After centrifugation, the liver was suspended in Buffer 2 (10 μg/mL Liberase TM (#05401119001, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) + 2 U/mL DNase (#M0303L, New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) + 3 mM CaCl2 + 25 mM HEPES made with RPMI-1640 with Glutamax), incubated at 37 °C with shaking (1 cycle/s) for 25 min and put on ice for 5 min. Then, the cell suspension passed through a 100 μm filter, was centrifuged, and resuspended in Buffer 3 (33% Percoll (#17089102, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) + 1 U/mL Heparin (#A493, Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) made with HBSS (#17460-15, Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan)). After 30 min of centrifugation, the supernatant was removed, and red blood cells were lysed with ACK buffer. Finally, the cells were resuspended in CyFACS buffer.
2.3. CyTOF Analysis
A single-cell suspension of 1–2 × 106 cells was used for CyTOF analysis. Briefly, cells were washed twice with CyFACS buffer. After Fc-blocking for 30 min, the cell surface protein was stained with a heavy-metal-labeled antibody cocktail (#201306, Standard BioTools, South San Francisco, CA, USA) for 45 min at RT. Next, dead cell staining was performed with cell-ID Cisplatin-198Pt (#201198, Standard BioTools) for 5 min at RT. After washing twice, cells were fixed in Maxpar Fix and Perm Buffer (#201067, Standard BioTools) overnight at 4 °C. The next day, cells were incubated with intercalator-Ir (#201192, Standard BioTools) in Maxpar Fix and Perm Buffer at RT, washed twice with MilliQ (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), and resuspended in Maxpar Cell Acquisition Solution (#201240, Standard BioTools) to 2.5–5 × 105 cells/mL. Cells were analyzed using the Helios CyTOF system (Standard BioTools), and data were collected and analyzed by FlowJo and Cytobank following the manufacturer’s protocol.
2.4. Biochemical Analysis
Serum samples were shipped to Oriental Yeast Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan), and biochemical analysis was performed using BioMajesty™ (#JCA-BM6050, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
2.5. Liver Histology
For hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and Sirius red staining, the formalin-fixed liver was embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 5 μm. After deparaffinization and hydration, sections were stained with Hematoxylin (#MHS16, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 3 min, washed with running water, and stained with Eosin (#051-06515, Fujifilm Wako) for 3 min. Sirius red staining was performed by a Picrosirius Red Stain Kit (#24901-250, Polysciences, Warrington, PA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. For Oil Red O staining, 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS-fixed liver was transferred to 30% sucrose in PBS until the tissue sank at 4 °C, embedded in a Tissue-Tek O.C.T. compound (#4583, Sakura Finetek, Tokyo, Japan). The liver was sectioned at 10 μm, dried at RT, and sections were immersed in Oil Red O staining solution (0.3% Oil Red O (#25633-92, Nacalai Tesque) in isopropanol: MilliQ (3:2)) for 15 min. Images were acquired using a VS-200 slide scanner (Evident, Tokyo, Japan) and a BZ-X810 microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan). Quantitative measurements of the images were carried out with ImageJ software (ImageJ 1.54f, National Institute of Health, USA). At least 10 images were randomly taken from each section for all quantitative measurements and scoring. NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) was determined by veterinarians specialized in pathology and experts from SMC laboratories (Tokyo, Japan) and Oriental Yeast following previous reports [9,10].
2.6. Real-Time PCR
Total RNA was extracted from the liver tissue using TRIzol (#15-596-018, Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA was treated with DNase (#M0303L, New England Biolabs) and purified using a Monarch RNA cleanup kit (#T2030, New England Biolabs). Reverse transcription was performed using ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix (#FSQ-201, TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan). THUNDERBIRD SYBR qPCR Mix (#QPS-201, TOYOBO) was utilized to conduct real-time PCR on QuantStudio 6 Pro (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). Hprt was used as an internal control. The list of probes is shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
Probe Name | Probe Sequence (5′ to 3′) |
---|---|
Col1a1-forward | GACGCATGGCCAAGAAGACA |
Col1a1-reverse | ATTGCACGTCATCGCACACA |
Acta2-forward | CTTCGCTGGTGATGATGCTC |
Acta2-reverse | GATGATGCCGTGTTCTATCG |
Tgfb1-forward | TATTTGGAGCCTGGACACAC |
Tgfb1-reverse | GTAGTAGACGATGGGCAGTGG |
Tnf-forward | AGCACAGAAAGCATGATCCG |
Tnf-reverse | GGAGGCCATTTGGGAACTTC |
Il6-forward | ACAAAGCCAGAGTCCTTCAGAG |
Il6-reverse | TTGGTCCTTAGCCACTCCTTC |
Il1b-forward | CCCTGCAGCTGGAGAGTGTGGA |
Il1b-reverse | TGTGCTCTGCTTGTGAGGTGCTG |
Ifng-forward | AGACAATCAGGCCATCAGCA |
Ifng-reverse | TGGACCTGTGGGTTGTTGAC |
Pck2-forward | ATGGCTGCTATGTACCTCCC |
Pck2-reverse | GCGCCACAAAGTCTCGAAC |
Pdk4-forward | AGGGAGGTCGAGCTGTTCTC |
Pdk4-reverse | GGAGTGTTCACTAAGCGGTCA |
Plin2-forward | GACCTTGTGTCCTCCGCTTAT |
Plin2-reverse | CAACCGCAATTTGTGGCTC |
Cox4i1-forward | GTACCGCATCCAGTTTAACGA |
Cox4i1-reverse | TGGGGCCATACACATAGCTCT |
Cox4i2-forward | CTGCCCGGAGTCTGGTAATG |
Cox4i2-reverse | CAGTCAACGTAGGGGGTCATC |
Hprt-forward | CGCAGTCCCAGCGTCGTGATT |
Hprt-reverse | CTTGAGCACACAGAGGGCCACAA |
2.7. Western Blotting
The liver was lysed in RiPA buffer (50 mM HEPES + 150 mM NaCl + 0.125 μM EDTA + 0.1% SDS + 0.5% Sodium Deoxycholate + 0.5% NP-40 + 0.1% Tween20 made with MilliQ). The protein amount in the lysate was measured by a Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (#23225, Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After loading 10 μg of protein for SDS-PAGE, the protein was transferred to the PVDF membrane, followed by Western blotting. Target proteins were detected by the antibodies as listed below: COL1A1 (#ABT123) and SREBP-1 (#MABS1987) from Sigma-Aldrich; and α-SMA (#ab5694), PGC-1α (#ab191838), Parkin (#ab77924), and LC3B (#ab192890) from Abcam (Cambridge, UK); and PGC-1β (#22378-1-AP) from Proteintech (Rosemont, IL, USA); and AceCS1 (#3658), ACL (#4332), p-ACL (#4331), ACC (#3676), p-ACC (#11818), Fas (#3180), AMPK (#5831), p-AMPK (#2535), PPARγ (#2435), and Tom20 (#42406) from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA); and β-actin (#sc-47778) from Santa Cruz (TX, USA).
2.8. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis of the experimental data was performed in GraphPad Prism version 10 using appropriate tests, as indicated in figure legends, with significant differences in markers on all figures.
3. Results
3.1. MASH Diet Feeding Induced Hepatic Steatosis, Inflammation, and Tumorigenesis
Six-week-old male mice were randomly subjected to either the Chow or the MASH diet for up to 48 weeks (Figure 2A). In the MASH diet, body weight loss was limited to less than 5% until 12 weeks, while 20–25% of the body weight loss started after 12 weeks, similar to the conventional CDAHD (Figure 2B). In addition, tumor formation was observed in 60% of the mice at 48 weeks (Figure 3C,D). These tumors were hepatocellular adenomas or nodular regenerative hyperplasia with macrovascular steatosis, not hepatocellular carcinoma (Figure 2E).
While score 1 steatosis occurs just after 1 week in the CDAHFD [10], the MASH diet feeding induced score 2 steatosis within 1 week and showed score 3 after 2 weeks (Figure 2F,G). Similar to the CDAHFD, the MASH model showed no ballooning of hepatocytes. Lobular inflammation showed score 2 at 2 weeks and sustained until 48 weeks (Figure 2F,G). NAS showed score 2 at 1 week and reached score 5 after 2 weeks (Figure 2G). AST and ALT, markers for liver injuries, were increased from 1 week, and thereafter were highly produced during the entire period (Figure 2H).
3.2. MASH Diet Feeding Induced Hepatic Fibrosis in a Time-Dependent Manner
Liver fibrosis was observed after 4 weeks, and collagen-deposited region spread after 8 weeks of MASH feeding (Figure 3A,B). Fibrosis scores ranged from 1 to 2, and no bridging formation was observed at week 48 (Figure 3A). In the liver, collagen is produced by activated α-SMA-positive hepatic stellate cells [24]. The expression of COL1A1 increased from 4 weeks after MASH feeding. Though α-SMA also increased from 4 to 8 weeks, its expression decreased after 12 weeks (Figure 3C,D). Additionally, Col1a1, Acta2, and Tgfb1 expression increased after 1 or 2 weeks of MASH induction (Figure 3E). These results suggest that hepatic fibrosis develops rapidly within 4 weeks and is associated with hepatic stellate cell activation.
3.3. MASH Diet Feeding Induced Inflammation in the Early Stage
Since hepatic stellate cell activation contributes to liver fibrogenesis [25], we next performed immuno-phenotyping of CD45+ cells by using CyTOF. CD45+ immune cell accumulation started increasing 1 week after MASH feeding and gradually diminished (Figure 4A). Interestingly, the number of myeloid cells, such as granulocytes and macrophages, increased in the liver, hence CD4+ T cells were decreased at 1 week (Figure 4B,C). At week 4, the proportion and actual number of granulocytes and macrophages diminished in the liver compared to that at 1 week (Figure 4B,C). The exact number of most of the immune cells decreased in the liver except for macrophages at 8 weeks (Figure 4B,C). The proportion of granulocytes also increased in the blood at 1 week and decreased at 4 weeks and 8 weeks, similar to the dynamics in the liver (Figure 4B,C). In contrast, at 8 weeks, the proportion of B cells in the blood increased despite a decrease in the B cell population in the liver (Figure 4B,C). We then evaluated the mRNA expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the MASH liver. Interestingly, Tnf, Il1b, and Ifng expression increased rapidly, while Il6 was unchanged (Figure 4D). These results suggest that inflammation in the liver occurs after 1 week or earlier depending on the myeloid cell infiltration.
3.4. Effects of MASH Diet Feeding on Lipid Accumulation and De Novo Lipogenesis in the Liver
Since score 2 steatosis was observed 1 week after MASH diet feeding, we performed the kinetic analysis of lipid accumulation in the MASH liver by Oil Red O staining (Figure 5A). As expected, more than 10% lipid accumulation was observed after 1 week and 30% at 8 weeks (Figure 5B). However, lipid accumulation decreased after 24 weeks, indicating the development of burned-out MASH (Figure 5B). Although reduced secretion of VLDL from the liver has been proposed to cause lipid accumulation in the chorine-deficient diet model of MASH, how CDAHFD feeding affects de novo lipogenesis in the liver is unclear [26]. Therefore, we assessed the expression of enzymes involved in the de novo fatty acid synthesis. Acetate and citrate are converted to acetyl CoA by AceCS1 and ACL in the liver, respectively [27,28]. After the MASH feeding, the expression of these enzymes decreased from 1 week (Figure 5C,D). In addition, the expression of SREBP-1, the transcription factor for lipid synthesis, was also reduced (Figure 5C,E). Furthermore, the expression of AMPK, which suppresses lipid synthesis via the downregulation of SREBP-1, was increased and phosphorylated, indicating that AMPK was activated (Figure 5C,D,F) [29]. These results suggest that fatty acid synthesis was suppressed in the MASH diet by the activation of the AMPK signaling pathway.
3.5. Effects of MASH Diet on Serum Components
We performed a serum biochemical analysis to determine the effects of MASH feeding on serum components. There were no obvious differences in total protein, albumin, A/G, and iron (Table 3). Triglyceride decreased at 1 week and 48 weeks, but no difference was observed in other periods (Table 3). On the other hand, for cholesterol, E/T was reduced by MASH feeding throughout the entire period due to a decrease in cholesteryl esters or an increase in free cholesterol (Table 3). Moreover, LDL cholesterol was lower for 12 weeks and HDL cholesterol for 24 weeks from the beginning of feeding (Table 3). These results and the decreased expression of SREBP-1 in the liver suggested the accumulation of cholesterol in the liver.
Table 3.
Time After Feeding | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variables | 0-Week | 1 Week | 2 Weeks | 4 Weeks | 8 Weeks | 12 Weeks | 24 Weeks | 48 Weeks |
TP (g/dL) | 5.0 ± 0.2 | 4.6 ± 0.1 | 4.7 ± 0.1 | 5.0 ± 0.1 | 4.6 ± 0.1 | 4.9 ± 0.1 | 5.0 ± 0.1 | 5.2 ± 0.2 |
Alb (g/dL) | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 3.3 ± 0.0 | 3.0 ± 0.1 | 3.1 ± 0.0 | 3.1 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.1 |
A/G | 1.9 ± 0.0 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.1 |
Fe (μg/dL) | 180.3 ± 23.1 | 199.0 ± 7.9 | 178.3 ± 7.3 | 182.3 ± 4.8 | 160.3 ± 9.4 | 176.7 ± 2.2 | 166.7 ± 23.5 | 159.7 ± 7.0 |
Total Cho (mg/dL) | 89.0 ± 2.9 | 59.0 ± 3.2 a | 57.3 ± 3.8 a | 65.0 ± 1.2 | 66.7 ± 5.5 | 77.0 ± 10.1 | 91.7 ± 1.7 | 118.7 ± 11.3 a |
Free Cho (mg/dL) | 14.7 ± 2.3 | 19.0 ± 1.2 | 20.3 ± 1.5 | 22.7 ± 1.8 | 20.3 ± 2.3 | 21.3 ± 2.3 | 27.3 ± 1.8 b | 31.7 ± 2.4 d |
Esterified Cho (mg/dL) | 75.0 ± 1.5 | 40.0 ± 3.8 c | 37.0 ± 2.5 c | 42.3 ± 1.8 b | 46.3 ± 3.4 b | 55.7 ± 7.8 | 64.3 ± 2.2 | 87.0 ± 9.0 |
E/T (%) | 82.3 ± 0.9 | 67.7 ± 3.3 c | 64.3 ± 0.9 d | 65.0 ± 2.5 d | 69.7 ± 1.2 c | 72.0 ± 0.6 b | 70.3 ± 1.8 b | 73.3 ± 0.9 a |
TG (mg/dL) | 77.3 ± 2.2 | 25.3 ± 0.9 a | 35.7 ± 6.9 | 77.3 ± 27.0 | 56.0 ± 10.5 | 35.0 ± 6.8 | 52.7 ± 2.2 | 30.3 ± 3.8 a |
NEFA (μEq/L) | 816.3 ± 23.9 | 805.0 ± 38.2 | 1100.3 ± 170.5 | 852.3 ± 148.9 | 1108.3 ± 61.4 | 653.7 ± 65.3 | 945.3 ± 203.1 | 733.7 ± 79.5 |
LDL Cho (mg/dL) | 6.3 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.0 b | 1.0 ± 0.0 b | 1.0 ± 0.0 b | 1.3 ± 0.3 b | 1.7 ± 0.3 b | 4.7 ± 0.9 | 7.0 ± 2.1 |
HDL Cho (mg/dL) | 61.0 ± 1.7 | 33.7 ± 4.1 c | 32.0 ± 2.5 c | 34.7 ± 1.2 c | 35.0 ± 1.2 c | 43.0 ± 5.5 a | 38.7 ± 2.8 b | 63.0 ± 6.2 |
TKB (μmol/L) | 117.0 ± 6.9 | 639.3 ± 273.9 a | 229.7 ± 40.9 | 236.0 ± 47.5 | 370.3 ± 136.5 | 318.7 ± 77.5 | 2098.3 ± 107.3 d | 232.3 ± 45.7 |
Zero weeks (0-week) in the table indicates Chow-diet-fed control mice. Values are presented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3); a p < 0.05, b p < 0.01, c p < 0.001, and d p < 0.0001 vs. 0-week group. Statistical significance was calculated by a one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test. TP: total protein; Alb: albumin; A/G: albumin/globulin ratio; Cho: cholesterol; E/T: esterified cholesterol/total cholesterol; TG: Triglyceride; NEFA: non-esterified fatty acid; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; TKB: total ketone body.
3.6. Effects of MASH Diet on PGC-1α/β and Mitophagy
PGC-1α and PGC-1β are the master regulators of mitochondrial homeostasis [30,31]. Depending on the nutritional status, PGC-1α regulates glycogenesis and fatty acid oxidation, while PGC-1β regulates lipid synthesis, VLDL synthesis, and secretion. Additionally, both have equal regulatory capacity for mitochondrial biosynthesis [32]. Since the CDAHFD model elicits mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress, we next investigated the effects of the MASH diet on mitochondria [10,11]. The expression of PGC-1α and PPARγ decreased during all periods except for 12 weeks (Figure 6A,B). Tom20, expressed on the mitochondrial outer membrane, decreased at all time points except for 4 and 12 weeks (Figure 6A,B). Meanwhile, Parkin, specifically involved in the mitophagy that degrades mitochondria, showed an increase only at week 12 (Figure 6A,B). LC3BII, an indicator of autophagosome formation, increased from 4 weeks after feeding on the MASH diet and decreased at 12 weeks. These results suggest that mitochondrial mass was reduced during the progression of MASH in correlation with PGC-1α expression in the liver. In addition, this mitochondrial mass reduction may be rescued by LC3BII-mediated autophagy. The decrease of PGC-1β was consistent with the lipid synthesis reduction during MASH diet feeding (Figure 6A,B).
Since mitochondrial mass reduction may affect the bioenergetic balance, we investigated the gene expression that functions in the metabolic pathway. Pck2, a marker of glycogenesis, and Pdk4, which is involved in fatty acid oxidation, increased in expression after MASH feeding (Figure 6C). Whereas the expression of Cox4i1, involved in OXPHOS, decreased during the entire period (Figure 6C), Cox4i2 was compensatorily upregulated (Figure 6C), consistent with the previous report [33]. The expression of Plin2, involved in fat droplet formation, was unchanged (Figure 6C). These results suggest that MASH diet feeding reduces mitochondrial OXPHOS and biogenesis, but instead promotes fatty acid degradation and gluconeogenesis against fat burden.
4. Discussion
We investigated the novel CDAHFD-based MASH diet to induce liver steatosis and fibrosis in mice similar to the human MASH phenotype. In addition, we identified the possible contribution of immune cells to the MASH pathogenesis. This MASH diet can induce score 2 steatosis at 1 week and fibrosis with collagen deposition at 4 weeks after feeding. We determined to clarify the optimal feeding period for the analysis of steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis to demonstrate its usefulness as a MASH disease model while indicating its advantages and disadvantages.
The CDAHFD induced about 20% body weight loss after 14 weeks, and continuous feeding up to 48 weeks resulted in about 25% body weight reduction compared to that of the Chow diet [7,13]. On the other hand, the body weight of the mice fed the MASH diet was almost the same as that of the Chow diet for up to 12 weeks. Although the MASH diet showed a similar pathophysiological process as the CDAHFD, the NAS reached five at 2 weeks, and the liver injury index increased markedly from 1 week, indicating that the MASH diet rapidly induced MASH more than the CDAHFD. Histological analysis showed that fibrosis in the liver increased from 4 weeks after MASH diet feeding and significantly increased at 8 weeks. On the other hand, the mRNA expression of Col1a1 and Acta2 increased from 1 week, indicating it may also be meaningful to analyze the onset of fibrogenesis from 1 week. In the early stage of human MASH, the expression of α-SMA in the liver positively correlates with that in the fibrosis stage [34,35,36,37]. Despite hepatic stellate cell activation impacting liver fibrosis, α-SMA expression decreased after 8 weeks in our MASH model, whereas fibrosis continued progression. Additionally, lobular inflammation was suppressed after 6 weeks in the CDAHFD, whereas it persisted for a long period (up to 48 weeks) in the MASH diet. These results indicate the pathophysiological difference between the CDAHFD diet and the MASH diet, and the immune cells that cause inflammation possibly promote fibrosis in the MASH diet.
Since the contribution of immune cells to MASH pathogenesis in the CDAHFD was unclear, we comprehensively analyzed the immune cells from the blood and liver to gain insights into the inflammatory response during the progression of MASH in the MASH diet. Briefly, hepatic immune cell infiltration was obvious at 1 week after feeding, with granulocytes, monocytes, and macrophages accounting for the greatest proportion. Importantly, the infiltration of neutrophils and monocytes has been identified in the early stages of human MASH [25]. These increased granulocytes, containing neutrophils, may contribute to the resolution of hepatic fibrosis [20]. In mice, B cells have been suggested to have both detrimental and protective effects in MASLD, whereas CD8+ T cells promote liver fibrosis resolution [23,38,39,40]. Since the contribution of B cells and T cells to hepatic fibrosis is still controversial, further detailed phenotyping is needed to determine their role in the MASH pathogenesis at several periods [21,22,23,25]. In the pathophysiology of MASH, TNF-α plays an important role in pathogenesis, while IL-1β causes inflammatory cell infiltration into the liver via inflammasome activation [37,41]. On the other hand, although IL-6 causes systemic insulin resistance in MASH, the Il6 mRNA expression is unchanged in the liver of human MAFLD [42,43]. Although our study also demonstrated that Il6 expression was unchanged in the liver during MASH pathogenesis, the contribution of IL-6 to the systemic insulin resistance associated with MASH should be further investigated.
Despite lipid synthesis being enhanced in human MASLD, some patients show a decrease in lipid droplets in advanced MASH, characterized as “burned-out MASH” [43,44,45]. As a choline-deficient diet inhibits lipid synthesis and VLDL secretion from the liver, the expression of enzymes involved in de novo lipogenesis and lipoprotein amounts in the serum decreased in our model [26]. In addition, since VLDL contains high levels of cholesterol, which is critical to establishing liver fibrosis, the inhibition of VLDL secretion induces VLDL accumulation in the liver and promotes fibrosis [46]. Furthermore, SREBP-1 expression decreases in burned-out MASH, and the inhibition of SREBP-1 increases the possible carcinogenesis in the liver via reduced autophagic flux [43,44]. In our model, SREBP-1 expression decreased after 1 week of feeding, and a reduction in lipid accumulation was observed from 8 weeks, indicating that the disease state of burned-out MASH might have started during this period.
Mitochondrial dysfunction leads to increased ROS production, which plays an important role in MASH pathogenesis [12]. In the CDAHFD model, mitochondrial function is impaired only 1 week after feeding [10]. In a healthy liver, damaged mitochondria are degraded by mitochondria-specific autophagy, known as mitophagy [47]. However, a MASH liver shows a disruption in mitophagy, causing the accumulation of damaged mitochondria and leading to MASH progression [48]. Since a decreased expression of SREBP-1 was observed in our MASH model, we hypothesized autophagic flux may affect MASH progression and investigated both mitochondrial degradation and biogenesis. In burned-out MASH, the decreased expression of LC3BII might indicate the suppression of macroautophagy. In addition, the constitutive reduction of Cox4i1 expression during the MASH diet feeding periods implied the inhibition of mitochondrial respiration. These results are consistent with the previous reports on human advanced MASH [43,44]. Whereas the expression of PGC-1α is decreased in mild human MASH, macroautophagic flux is increased compared to simple steatosis [48]. Furthermore, PGC-1β promotes lipogenesis independently of PGC-1α in hepatocytes [49]. These data are consistent with results at 4 weeks in our MASH model. We further showed that PGC-1β expression decreased after 8 weeks, suggesting a transition to burned-out MASH with a decrease in accumulated lipids. In contrast, PGC-1α expression was increased in advanced MASH. These coordinated changes between PGC-1α and PGC-1β may influence the pathogenesis of burned-out MASH. However, further investigation is required to fully understand the hepatic lipid deposition status in MASH by PGC-1 balance.
5. Conclusions
In this study, we developed a modified MASH diet with inflammation, fibrosis, and the dynamics of lipid deposition in the liver, similar to the disease state of human MASH patients in some ways. Briefly, this MASH diet can induce fibrosis earlier than the conventional CDAHFD model with myeloid cell infiltration and inflammation in the liver. This new pre-clinical MASH model allows us to investigate the pathophysiology of MASH by evaluating the interaction between parenchymal and non-parenchymal cells.
Acknowledgments
We thank Kazue Koikeda for secretory assistance and Rie Oishi, Mikiko Kubo, Yuri Kitajima, and Naoko Nakao for technical assistance.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, T.S. and S.A.; formal analysis, T.S. and N.H.; investigation, T.S.; resources, H.M.; data curation, T.S.; writing—original draft preparation, T.S.; writing—review and editing, Y.N. and S.K.S.; visualization, T.S.; supervision, S.A.; funding acquisition, K.M. and S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The animal study protocol was approved by the Animal Research Committee of the Research Institute for Microbial Disease of Osaka University (protocol codes: H30-03-0 and R5-04-0, approved on 12 October 2018 and 21 July 2023, respectively).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
Y.N. declares to be an employee and shareholder of Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. H.M. declares to be an employee of Oriental Yeast Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) for Grant-Aid for Scientific Research (S) (20H00506), Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) (20H05693), and by the research grant from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (JP223fa627002). This work was also supported by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. for the Joint Research Chair of innate immunity (1851010012).
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Younossi Z.M., Golabi P., Paik J.M., Henry A., Van Dongen C., Henry L. The Global Epidemiology of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH): A Systematic Review. Hepatology. 2023;77:1335–1347. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Miao L., Targher G., Byrne C.D., Cao Y.-Y., Zheng M.-H. Current Status and Future Trends of the Global Burden of MASLD. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2024;35:697–707. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2024.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Harrison S.A., Loomba R., Dubourg J., Ratziu V., Noureddin M. Clinical Trial Landscape in NASH. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2023;21:2001–2014. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.03.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Harrison S.A., Allen A.M., Dubourg J., Noureddin M., Alkhouri N. Challenges and Opportunities in NASH Drug Development. Nat. Med. 2023;29:562–573. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02242-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hansen H.H., Feigh M., Veidal S.S., Rigbolt K.T., Vrang N., Fosgerau K. Mouse Models of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Preclinical Drug Development. Drug Discov. Today. 2017;22:1707–1718. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vacca M., Kamzolas I., Harder L.M., Oakley F., Trautwein C., Hatting M., Ross T., Bernardo B., Oldenburger A., Hjuler S.T., et al. An Unbiased Ranking of Murine Dietary Models Based on Their Proximity to Human Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) Nat. Metab. 2024;6:1178–1196. doi: 10.1038/s42255-024-01043-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Matsumoto M., Hada N., Sakamaki Y., Uno A., Shiga T., Tanaka C., Ito T., Katsume A., Sudoh M. An Improved Mouse Model That Rapidly Develops Fibrosis in Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2013;94:93–103. doi: 10.1111/iep.12008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brunt E.M., Kleiner D.E., Wilson L.A., Belt P., Neuschwander-Tetri B.A. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score and the Histopathologic Diagnosis in NAFLD: Distinct Clinicopathologic Meanings. Hepatology. 2011;53:810–820. doi: 10.1002/hep.24127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liang W., Menke A.L., Driessen A., Koek G.H., Lindeman J.H., Stoop R., Havekes L.M., Kleemann R., van den Hoek A.M. Establishment of a General NAFLD Scoring System for Rodent Models and Comparison to Human Liver Pathology. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e115922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sugasawa T., Ono S., Yonamine M., Fujita S., Matsumoto Y., Aoki K., Nakano T., Tamai S., Yoshida Y., Kawakami Y., et al. One Week of CDAHFD Induces Steatohepatitis and Mitochondrial Dysfunction with Oxidative Stress in Liver. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:5851. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yamada A., Watanabe A., Nara A., Ishimaru N., Maeda K., Ido Y., Kotake K., Asano M., Shinohara Y., Yamamoto T. Longitudinal Analysis of Mitochondrial Function in a Choline-Deficient L-Amino Acid-Defined High-Fat Diet-Induced Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis Mouse Model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25:6193. doi: 10.3390/ijms25116193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Buzzetti E., Pinzani M., Tsochatzis E.A. The Multiple-Hit Pathogenesis of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Metabolism. 2016;65:1038–1048. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2015.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ikawa-Yoshida A., Matsuo S., Kato A., Ohmori Y., Higashida A., Kaneko E., Matsumoto M. Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Mouse Model Fed a Choline-deficient, L-amino Acid-defined, High-fat Diet. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2017;98:221–233. doi: 10.1111/iep.12240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kisoh K., Sugahara G., Ogawa Y., Furukawa S., Ishida Y., Okanoue T., Kohara M., Tateno C. Estimating Drug Efficacy with a Diet-Induced NASH Model in Chimeric Mice with Humanized Livers. Biomedicines. 2021;9:1647. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9111647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hammerich L., Tacke F. Hepatic Inflammatory Responses in Liver Fibrosis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2023;20:633–646. doi: 10.1038/s41575-023-00807-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Xu R., Huang H., Zhang Z., Wang F.-S. The Role of Neutrophils in the Development of Liver Diseases. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2014;11:224–231. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2014.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liang W., Lindeman J.H., Menke A.L., Koonen D.P., Morrison M., Havekes L.M., van den Hoek A.M., Kleemann R. Metabolically Induced Liver Inflammation Leads to NASH and Differs from LPS- or IL-1β-Induced Chronic Inflammation. Lab. Investig. 2014;94:491–502. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2014.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.O’Brien K.M., Allen K.M., Rockwell C.E., Towery K., Luyendyk J.P., Copple B.L. IL-17A Synergistically Enhances Bile Acid-Induced Inflammation during Obstructive Cholestasis. Am. J. Pathol. 2013;183:1498–1507. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.07.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ma J., Guillot A., Yang Z., Mackowiak B., Hwang S., Park O., Peiffer B.J., Ahmadi A.R., Melo L., Kusumanchi P., et al. Distinct Histopathological Phenotypes of Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis Suggest Different Mechanisms Driving Liver Injury and Failure. J. Clin. Investig. 2022;132:e157780. doi: 10.1172/JCI157780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Calvente C.J., Tameda M., Johnson C.D., del Pilar H., Lin Y.C., Adronikou N., De Mollerat Du Jeu X., Llorente C., Boyer J., Feldstein A.E. Neutrophils Contribute to Spontaneous Resolution of Liver Inflammation and Fibrosis via MicroRNA-223. J. Clin. Investig. 2019;129:4091–4109. doi: 10.1172/JCI122258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Thapa M., Chinnadurai R., Velazquez V.M., Tedesco D., Elrod E., Han J., Sharma P., Ibegbu C., Gewirtz A., Anania F., et al. Liver Fibrosis Occurs through Dysregulation of MyD88-dependent Innate B-cell Activity. Hepatology. 2015;61:2067–2079. doi: 10.1002/hep.27761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Barrow F., Khan S., Fredrickson G., Wang H., Dietsche K., Parthiban P., Robert S., Kaiser T., Winer S., Herman A., et al. Microbiota-Driven Activation of Intrahepatic B Cells Aggravates NASH Through Innate and Adaptive Signaling. Hepatology. 2021;74:704–722. doi: 10.1002/hep.31755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Karl M., Hasselwander S., Zhou Y., Reifenberg G., Kim Y.O., Park K., Ridder D.A., Wang X., Seidel E., Hövelmeyer N., et al. Dual Roles of B Lymphocytes in Mouse Models of Diet-induced Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Hepatology. 2022;76:1135–1149. doi: 10.1002/hep.32428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cassiman D., Libbrecht L., Desmet V., Denef C., Roskams T. Hepatic Stellate Cell/Myofibroblast Subpopulations in Fibrotic Human and Rat Livers. J. Hepatol. 2002;36:200–209. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8278(01)00260-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Huby T., Gautier E.L. Immune Cell-Mediated Features of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2022;22:429–443. doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00639-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rinella M.E., Elias M.S., Smolak R.R., Fu T., Borensztajn J., Green R.M. Mechanisms of Hepatic Steatosis in Mice Fed a Lipogenic Methionine Choline-Deficient Diet. J. Lipid Res. 2008;49:1068–1076. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M800042-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sanders F.W.B., Griffin J.L. De Novo Lipogenesis in the Liver in Health and Disease: More than Just a Shunting Yard for Glucose. Biol. Rev. 2016;91:452–468. doi: 10.1111/brv.12178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Batchuluun B., Pinkosky S.L., Steinberg G.R. Lipogenesis Inhibitors: Therapeutic Opportunities and Challenges. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2022;21:283–305. doi: 10.1038/s41573-021-00367-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wang Q., Liu S., Zhai A., Zhang B., Tian G. AMPK-Mediated Regulation of Lipid Metabolism by Phosphorylation. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2018;41:985–993. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b17-00724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Scarpulla R.C. Metabolic Control of Mitochondrial Biogenesis through the PGC-1 Family Regulatory Network. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Res. 2011;1813:1269–1278. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.09.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Liu L., Li Y., Wang J., Zhang D., Wu H., Li W., Wei H., Ta N., Fan Y., Liu Y., et al. Mitophagy Receptor FUNDC1 Is Regulated by PGC-1α/NRF1 to Fine Tune Mitochondrial Homeostasis. EMBO Rep. 2021;22:e50629. doi: 10.15252/embr.202050629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Piccinin E., Villani G., Moschetta A. Metabolic Aspects in NAFLD, NASH and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Role of PGC1 Coactivators. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019;16:160–174. doi: 10.1038/s41575-018-0089-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Douiev L., Miller C., Ruppo S., Benyamini H., Abu-Libdeh B., Saada A. Upregulation of COX4-2 via HIF-1α in Mitochondrial COX4-1 Deficiency. Cells. 2021;10:452. doi: 10.3390/cells10020452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schuppan D., Surabattula R., Wang X.Y. Determinants of Fibrosis Progression and Regression in NASH. J. Hepatol. 2018;68:238–250. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Decaris M.L., Li K.W., Emson C.L., Gatmaitan M., Liu S., Wang Y., Nyangau E., Colangelo M., Angel T.E., Beysen C., et al. Identifying Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients with Active Fibrosis by Measuring Extracellular Matrix Remodeling Rates in Tissue and Blood. Hepatology. 2017;65:78–88. doi: 10.1002/hep.28860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zisser A., Ipsen D.H., Tveden-Nyborg P. Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation and Inactivation in NASH-Fibrosis—Roles as Putative Treatment Targets? Biomedicines. 2021;9:365. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9040365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jarrar M.H., Baranova A., Collantes R., Ranard B., Stepanova M., Bennett C., Fang Y., Elariny H., Goodman Z., Chandhoke V., et al. Adipokines and Cytokines in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008;27:412–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03586.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.de Lalla C., Galli G., Aldrighetti L., Romeo R., Mariani M., Monno A., Nuti S., Colombo M., Callea F., Porcelli S.A., et al. Production of Profibrotic Cytokines by Invariant NKT Cells Characterizes Cirrhosis Progression in Chronic Viral Hepatitis. J. Immunol. 2004;173:1417–1425. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.2.1417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Park O., Jeong W.-I., Wang L., Wang H., Lian Z.-X., Gershwin E.M., Gao B. Diverse Roles of Invariant Natural Killer T Cells in Liver Injury and Fibrosis Induced by Carbon Tetrachloride. Hepatology. 2009;49:1683–1694. doi: 10.1002/hep.22813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Koda Y., Teratani T., Chu P.-S., Hagihara Y., Mikami Y., Harada Y., Tsujikawa H., Miyamoto K., Suzuki T., Taniki N., et al. CD8+ Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells Promote Liver Fibrosis Resolution by Inducing Apoptosis of Hepatic Stellate Cells. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:4474. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24734-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Csak T., Ganz M., Pespisa J., Kodys K., Dolganiuc A., Szabo G. Fatty Acid and Endotoxin Activate Inflammasomes in Mouse Hepatocytes That Release Danger Signals to Stimulate Immune Cells. Hepatology. 2011;54:133–144. doi: 10.1002/hep.24341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cancello R., Tordjman J., Poitou C., Guilhem G., Bouillot J.L., Hugol D., Coussieu C., Basdevant A., Hen A.B., Bedossa P., et al. Increased Infiltration of Macrophages in Omental Adipose Tissue Is Associated with Marked Hepatic Lesions in Morbid Human Obesity. Diabetes. 2006;55:1554–1561. doi: 10.2337/db06-0133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nagaya T., Tanaka N., Suzuki T., Sano K., Horiuchi A., Komatsu M., Nakajima T., Nishizawa T., Joshita S., Umemura T., et al. Down-Regulation of SREBP-1c Is Associated with the Development of Burned-out NASH. J. Hepatol. 2010;53:724–731. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.04.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kawamura S., Matsushita Y., Kurosaki S., Tange M., Fujiwara N., Hayata Y., Hayakawa Y., Suzuki N., Hata M., Tsuboi M., et al. Inhibiting SCAP/SREBP Exacerbates Liver Injury and Carcinogenesis in Murine Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. J. Clin. Investig. 2022;132:e151895. doi: 10.1172/JCI151895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lambert J.E., Ramos–Roman M.A., Browning J.D., Parks E.J. Increased De Novo Lipogenesis Is a Distinct Characteristic of Individuals with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:726–735. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.11.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Teratani T., Tomita K., Suzuki T., Oshikawa T., Yokoyama H., Shimamura K., Tominaga S., Hiroi S., Irie R., Okada Y., et al. A High-Cholesterol Diet Exacerbates Liver Fibrosis in Mice via Accumulation of Free Cholesterol in Hepatic Stellate Cells. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:152–164.e10. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.09.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Youle R.J., Narendra D.P. Mechanisms of Mitophagy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011;12:9–14. doi: 10.1038/nrm3028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Moore M.P., Cunningham R.P., Meers G.M., Johnson S.A., Wheeler A.A., Ganga R.R., Spencer N.M., Pitt J.B., Diaz-Arias A., Swi A.I.A., et al. Compromised Hepatic Mitochondrial Fatty Acid Oxidation and Reduced Markers of Mitochondrial Turnover in Human NAFLD. Hepatology. 2022;76:1452–1465. doi: 10.1002/hep.32324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Finck B.N. PGC-1 Coactivators: Inducible Regulators of Energy Metabolism in Health and Disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2006;116:615–622. doi: 10.1172/JCI27794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.