Abstract
Mastitis in dairy animals affect milk quality and quantity, animal health and welfare, antimicrobial use and economics of dairy farm, and antimicrobial residues in milk. Staphylococcus aureus is most common mastitis pathogen with ability to cause infections which are difficult to treat. The present study aimed to characterize the S. aureus strains associated with dairy animal with reference to its virulence, biofilm formation, antimicrobial resistance including methicillin and penicillin G resistance. A total of 100 bovine milk samples were screened by bacterial culture method, out of which 18 S. aureus and 6 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates were identified and characterized for virulence determinants. The strains were uniformly positive for the virulence determinants. However, the hemolysis in blood agar was found to be specific but not a sensitive criterion for virulence. The biofilm formation ability of the isolates showed 61.66% of S. aureus and 83.33% of MRSA strains were positive by Microtiter plate method. The biofilm formation genes (icaA and icaD) were detected in all the strains. The multi-drug resistance profile of the strains was studied by disk diffusion assay where over 70% of S. aureus strains were sensitive to all the anti-microbial agents (except penicillin) and only 33.33% of the strains had the MAR index above 0.2. All the MRSA strains (100%) had a MAR index of ≥ 0.2. All the strains showed resistance to penicillin which is considered as a prognostic marker for mastitis. The presence of penicillin and/or methicillin resistant, biofilm forming S. aureus mastitis strains can severely affect the treatment outcomes and economics of small dairy farmers of the region. Further studies to understand the population structure of the strains, by whole genome or traditional sequence-based methods and MIC values of antibiotics are required.
Keywords: Bovine milk, Mastitis, Staphylococcus aureus, Multi-drug resistance profile, Biofilm
Introduction
Despite considerable research on mastitis of dairy animals, the disease still remains a major problem to the dairy farmer and dairy industry. There is a demand for wholesome, nutritious and safe milk which can originate only from healthy animal. Further the need to control mastitis is driven by multiple considerations including milk quality and quantity, producer economic viability, reductions in antimicrobial use and animal welfare [1].
Staphylococcus aureus is the most important and prevalent bacteria which cause mastitis in dairy cattle and buffalo. Because of its contagiousness and capacity to induce long-lasting chronic infections, S. aureus is among the few major pathogens associated with endemic mastitis all over the world. As the herd is the epidemiological unit for mastitis, the farm specific control measures for mastitis are required. Owing to the phenotypic and genomic plasticity of S. aureus the outcome of mastitis is highly variable and can range from subclinical to acute gangrenous mastitis or persistent, chronic mastitis. The ability to invade mammary epithelial cells (MEC) and exist as Small Colony Variants (SCV), form a biofilm and polysaccharide capsules seems to be most common attributes to S. aureus persistence in the host. This complicates the identification of affected animal even by bacteriological culture [2].
A significant proportion of mastitis strains (40–60%, depending on the reports) are able to form biofilms in vitro [3]. This may be associated with reduced antimicrobial susceptibility, resulting in disappointing cure rates, especially for infections of long duration [4]. The primary reason for antibiotic use on the dairy farm is mastitis. The mastitis causing S. aureus strains remain susceptible to common antibiotics used in the treatment. Penicillin resistance is probably the most well-known antibiotic resistance of S. aureus. Antimicrobial treatment with penicillin-resistant S. aureus strains results in a lower cure rate for treatment with either β-lactam or non-β-lactam antibiotics [5, 6].
Staphylococcus aureus is a multi-faceted pathogen that can exist as contagious and environment pathogen, extracellular and intracellular, form biofilm, a clonal bacteria but its prevalence varies with geographical locations. The emergence of MRSA as a cause of mastitis may also impact human health due to its potential zoonotic transmission. This makes necessary to monitor the prevalence and characteristics of this important pathogen. The present study aimed to characterize the S. aureus strains associated with dairy animal with reference to its biofilm formation, antimicrobial resistance including methicillin and penicillin G resistance. The latter is also an important prognostic marker.
Material and Methods
Collection of Milk Samples
A total of 100 samples of milk were collected aseptically from quarter/composite milk from bovines with mastitis (clinical or subclinical) from participating dairies and pooled milk from participating and non-participating dairies (Table 1). The clinical mastitis (CM) was identified as abnormal milk, abnormal udder and/or abnormal cow. The subclinical mastitis (SCM) was identified by California mastitis test (CMT) with a score of above 1 [7].
Table 1.
Details of the Total milk samples collected for the study
| S. no | Source of sample | No. of sample |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mastitis milk from farm* | 26 |
| 2 | Teaching Veterinary Clinical Complex (TVCC) | 36 |
| 3 | Pooled milk | 38 |
| Total | 100 | |
*A total of 116 bovines (cow = 103 and Buffalo = 13) from dairy farms were screened for mastitis by CMT
Screening of Milk Samples for Staphylococcus aureus
Isolation of Staphylococcus aureus from milk was done as per the method of [8] with slight modification. Briefly, the milk sample was inoculated in Mannitol Salt Agar (MSA) and thereafter in Baird-Parker Agar (BPA) with egg yolk tellurite after pre-enrichment with 6.5% NaCl and incubated overnight at 37 °C. The typical single pure colony on Tryptone Soy Agar (TSA) were phenotypically and genotypically characterized for identification and virulence determinants. The phenotypic characterization was done by Gram’s staining, catalase, pigmentation, Tube coagulase (TC), Voges-Proskauer (VP), hemolysis in Sheep Blood Agar (SBA), beta-galactosidase tests, Novobiocin (5 μg) resistance (> 16 mm) and Polymyxin B (300 U) susceptibility (≤ 10 mm) [9, 10]. When the incomplete (α) haemolysis turned complete on storage of the SBA plates at 4 °C, it was regarded as hot–cold lysis. The presence of thermostable nuclease (nuc), staphylococcal protein A (spa) and Panton–Valentine leucocidin (pvl) gene were confirmed by PCR as detailed below (Table 2).
Table 2.
Sequences of primer sets with their corresponding PCR protocols and product
| PCR | Gene | Primer sequence | size (bp) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | spa |
spa- F: TAA AGA CGA TCC TTC GGT GAG C spa- R: CAG CAG TAG TGC CGT TTG CTT |
180–600 bp | [12] |
| 1 | mecA |
mecA-F: TCC AGA TTA CAA CTT CAC CAG G mecA-R: CCA CTT CAT ATC TTG TAA CG |
162 bp | |
| 1 | pvl |
pvl -F: GCT GGA CAA AAC TTC TTG GAA TAT pvl- R: GAT AGG ACA CCA ATA AAT TCT GGA TTG |
87 bp | |
| 2 | nuc |
nuc-F: GCG ATT GAT GGT GAT ACG GTT nuc-R: AGC CAA GCC TTG ACG AAC TAA AGC |
279 bp | [13] |
| 3 | blaZ |
blaZ-F: AAG AGA TTT GCC TAT GCT TC blaZ-R: GCT TGA CCA CTT TTA TCA GC |
518 bp | [14] |
| 4 | icaA |
icaA-F: CCTAAC TAA CGA AAG GTA G icaA-R: AAG ATATAG CGA TAA GTG C |
1315 bp | [15] |
| 5 | icaD |
icaD-F: AAA CGT AAG AGA GGT GG icaD-R: GGC AAT ATG ATC AAG ATA C |
318 bp | [15] |
194 °C for 5 min, 30 × (94ºC for 30 s, 59 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min), 72 °C for 10 min, and 4 °C for ∞
294 °C for 5 min, 37 × (94 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1.5 min), 72 °C for 3.5 min, and 4 °C for ∞
394 °C for 5 min, 35 × (94 °C for 5 min, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s), 72 °C for 10 min, and 4 °C for ∞
4,530 × (92 °C for 45 s, 49 °C for 45 s, 72 °C for 1 min), 72 °C for 7 min, and 4 °C for ∞
Screening of Milk Samples for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
Isolation and identification of MRSA from the milk was done as above except that cefoxitin (3.5 mg/L) and Aztreonam (75 mg/L) were used for selective enrichment in all the steps [8].
Genotypic Characterization of the Isolates
The isolation of genomic DNA was done using Instagene™ matrix (Bio-Rad) as per the manufacturer’s instruction [11].
Multiplex PCR for the Detection of spa, mecA and pvl
The detection of polymorphic Xr portion of spa gene for identification of S. aureus isolates, mecA gene for confirmation of methicillin resistance and lukF-PV or pvl gene for detection of Panton–Valentine leucocidin was done in a 25 μL reaction using DreamTaq™ Green PCR Master Mix (2X) with 2 μL of DNA purified as above and 2 μL each of Forward and Reverse Primer mix. The 1000 μL of primer mix was made using 25 μL of 100 μM of each primer. The primer sequence and cycling conditions is mentioned in Table 2.
PCR for the Detection of nuc, icaA/icaD and blaZ gene
The detection of nuc, ica (intercellular adhesion) A and icaD and blaZ gene for the presence of thermostable nuclease, biofilm production and penicillinase resistance, respectively was done in a 25 μL reaction using DreamTaq™ Green PCR Master Mix (2×) with 2 μL of DNA purified as above and 2 μL each of Forward and Reverse Primer (10 μM). The primer sequence and cycling conditions is mentioned in Table 2.
Biofilm Formation Ability of the Isolates
The biofilm forming ability of the isolates was studied using following three methods:
Congo Red Agar (CRA) method:An overnight culture of the isolates was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland and 4 µL of it was spot inoculated in the CRA (Brain Heart Infusion Agar with 0.08% Congo red and 5% sucrose) [16]. The plates were incubated 35 °C for 18–24 h. A positive result (biofilm formation) was indicated by the presence of black or pink colonies with a dry crystalline surface (rough colony phenotype) while negative result (non-biofilm formation) was indicated by the presence of smooth, pink colonies.
Microtitre plate (Mtp) assay for biofilm formation: The isolates were grown overnight in Tryptone Soy Broth (TSB) supplemented with 0.25% glucose (TSB-glucose) which was diluted 1:40 in TSB-glucose, and 200 µL of this cell suspension was used per well to inoculate sterile, 96-well tissue culture plates (Tarson). Each isolate was run in triplicate and negative control wells contained broth only. The plate was incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The wells were gently washed three times with 200 µL of sterile phosphate-buffered saline, air dried in an inverted position, and stained with 0.1% safranin for 10 min. The biofilms were washed once with distilled water and then dried at 37 °C for 15 min. The stain was then released with 200 μL of the destaining solution (50% (v/v) ethanol, 50% (v/v) glacial acetic acid), and quantified by measuring the absorbance at 490 nm (A490) with a microplate reader [17, 18]. The isolates were classified as non-biofilm, weak, moderate and strong biofilm producer [19].
The Tube Method for testing biofilm formation: Determination of biofilm formation on a glass surface was carried out essentially in the same way as of Microtiter plate method, except that glass tubes were used instead of microtiter plates and 5 ml of TSB + 0.25% glucose was inoculated instead of 200 μL of TSB + 0.25% glucose.
Antibiotic Sensitivity Profile of the Isolates
The Antibiotic sensitivity test of S. aureus isolates against 11 antimicrobial agents [20] were done by disk diffusion assay (Table 3) as per the method of CLSI [21].
Table 3.
Panel of Antimicrobial agents for Antibiotic Sensitivity profile of the isolates
| S. No | Antimicrobial agent | Disc (µg) | Group | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cefoxitin | 30 | Cephalosporin | Methicillin-Resistance |
| 2 | Chloramphenicol | 30 | Chloramphenicol | |
| 3 | Ciprofloxacin | 5 | Fluoroquinolone | |
| 4 | Clindamycin | 2 | Lincosamide | |
| 5 | Co-trimoxazole | 25 | Sulfonamide | |
| 6 | Erythromycin | 15 | Macrolide | |
| 7 | Gentamicin | 10 | Aminoglycoside | |
| 8 | Linezolid | 30 | Oxazolidinones | |
| 9 | Mupirocin | 200 | Monocarboxylic acid | |
| 10 | Penicillin | 10 | Penicillin | Penicillinase |
| 11 | Tetracycline | 30 | Tetracycline |
Multiple Antibiotic Resistance (MAR) Index
The MAR index is defined as a/b, where a represents the number of antibiotics to which the isolate was resistant, and b represents the number of antibiotics to which the isolate was exposed.
Result and Discussion
For the treatment, prevention and control of mastitis, the laboratory diagnosis by culture method is still the most reliable method. It is of particular importance for S. aureus as it can be a commensal or mastitis pathogen. Moreover, S. aureus cause mastitis which can extend over the multiple lactation periods of the dairy cow and therefore, is the important reason for dry cow therapy.
In this study, the California Mastitis Test (CMT) was used to screen the herd for subclinical mastitis and the prevalence in dairy cattle was found to be 25.24% (26/103) while no cases (0/13) were found in buffaloes (Table 4). In another similar study in Rewa district, the overall prevalence of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows was found to be 31.40% on animal wise, 7.85% on quarter wise and 2.48% on blind teat wise [22]. Several studies show that there is spatio-temporal distribution of mastitis pathogens including S. aureus which in turn help to inform programs for the successful control and management of mastitis [23, 24].
Table 4.
Prevalence of Mastitis in bovines in the studied population using CMT
| S. No | Particular | Cattle | Buffalo |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Animals screened for mastitis | 103 | 13 |
| 2 | Subclinical mastitis (SCM) | 26 | 0 |
| 3 | Prevalence of subclinical mastitis (SCM) | 25.24 | 0 |
Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus in the Milk
The milk samples (n = 100) were screened for S. aureus using the criteria-salt tolerance at 6.5% NaCl, growth in selective agars (Mannitol salt agar and Baird–Parker agar with egg yolk-tellurite supplement) and standard biochemical tests as shown in Table 5. Unlike the strains of human origin which produce typical yellow colour colonies, the colony of all the isolates were white or off-white in colour which is very typical of isolates of ruminant origin [25]. To ensure the isolates had pathogenicity, the virulence determinants-coagulase, staphylococcal protein, thermostable nuclease, Panton–Valentine leucocidin, biofilm, penicillinase production, mannitol fermentation and haemolysis in sheep blood agar of each isolate was studied by phenotypic and/or genotypic method. These milk samples were also screened for MRSA using cefoxitin and aztreonam as selective enrichment method. This method of selective enrichment is effective for isolation of MRSA.
Table 5.
Phenotypic characterization of Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA in the milk
| S.No | Isolates | Growth in MSA | Growth in BPA | G + ve cocci | NV 5 μg | PB 300 U | TC | Haemolysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| α | α, β | γ | ||||||||
| 1 | Staphylococcus aureus | 48 | 39 | 18 | > 16 mm | ≤ 10 mm | 18 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| 2 | MRSA | 35 | 20 | 10 | > 16 mm | ≤ 10 mm | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Haemolysis in blood agar represents an important criterion for rapid presumptive identification of S. aureus isolates of bovine origin [25, 26]. The variation in haemolysis by the isolates are shown in Table 5. The phenotypic alpha (α) and beta (β) haemolysis shows geographical variation [27]. Our findings are not consistent with previous findings where around 80% of bovine S. aureus isolates showed α and/or β haemolysis [28]. In another study all the S. aureus isolates from clinical mastitis showed α haemolysis as determined by hot–cold lysis [22]. The α haemolysis is very characteristic of isolates from ruminant origin. The hemolysis pattern in MRSA strains seen in our study is in agreement with the study in which 62.7% showed non-haemolytic, 23.2% showed α and β haemolysis, 12.5% showed β-haemolysis and only 1.6% showed α-haemolysis [29]. Our study is in agreement with the studies which suggests that haemolysis is not a very sensitive criteria of the isolates from ruminant origin so the use of SBA for the isolation of pathogenic S. aureus using haemolysis as criterion should be done in conjunction with coagulase test [26, 30].
In this study, all the 18 S. aureus and 6 MRSA strains were positive for nuc and spa gene (Figs. 1 and 2). Two major roles have been proposed for the nuclease during infection, the disruption of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and modulating biofilm development. It has been shown that the expression of nuclease results in reduced biofilm formation in vitro, while a nuc mutant displays enhanced biofilm formation [31]. The second role proposed for nuclease during infection is the evasion of NETs. NETs are a newly discovered killing mechanism utilized by neutrophils against bacterial infections. Activated neutrophils secrete nuclear DNA at the site of infection to entrap bacteria and enhance bacterial killing. Nuclease is able to degrade NETs and promote resistance against killing by neutrophils [32].
Fig. 1.

Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis showing nuc gene PCR amplification products (279 base pair) of Staphylococcus aureus. M = 100 base pair (bp) ladder, Lane1–6 nuc positive Staphylococcus aureus isolates
Fig. 2.
Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis showing multiplex PCR amplification products for the detection of the spa, mecA, pvl gene of Staphylococcus aureus. The amplification of spa gene show bands ranging from 300 to 400 bp. M = 100 base pair (bp) ladder, Lane 1, 3 spa and mecA positive MRSA isolates, Lane 2—negative control, Lane 4–6 spa positive Staphylococcus aureus
In this study, the presence of Panton–Valentine Leukocidin (PVL) was not detected in any of the strains by PCR. The presence of PVL is considered a rare finding in bovine isolates but is an important virulence determinant for isolates of human origin [33–35]. Although one study identified pvl gene in more than 50% of isolates from bovine mastitis [36] while another study detected pvl toxin gene in 41.5% of the isolates collected from three Chinese Holstein herds [37]. In India, the pvl gene was detected in 41.6–82.05% of the S. aureus isolates from bovine milk [38–40].
The methicillin resistance is due to the production of PBP2a or penicillin-binding protein 2a (target modification), which is encoded by the mecA gene located on the mobile element of the staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec). The presence of these genes in MRSA makes them resistant to multiple antibiotics, particularly all ß-lactam antibiotics. It has been suggested that cattle may serve as a source of MDR and new MRSA strains in humans [41, 42]. In this study, 6% prevalence of MRSA was reported in the bovine milk after genotypic confirmation by mecA PCR (Fig. 2) (Table 6). In India, the prevalence of MRSA in bovine milk has been reported to vary widely between 13.1 and 48.84% [35, 39, 43, 44].
Table 6.
Genotypic characterization of Positive Isolates
| S.No | Sample | nuc | spa | mecA | pvl | blaZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Staphylococcu aureus | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 18 |
| 2 | MRSA | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
Biofilm Forming Ability of Staphylococcus aureus Strains
The formation of biofilm is a complex and dynamic three step process-initial attachment, biofilm formation and maturation, biofilm dispersal. The biofilm formation ability of all the S. aureus strains (n = 18) and MRSA strains (n = 6) were studied by three methods-Congo Red Agar (CRA), Microtiter plate (using Safranin) and tube method [17, 18]. The results are depicted in Table 7. In this study, a total of 33.33% S. aureus and 66.66% MRSA strains were slime producers by CRA method which is a not a quantitative assay because it is based on a subjective chromatic evaluation. Based on Microtiter plate method, all the S. aureus and MRSA strains were classified as weak or moderate biofilm producers. Multiple studies found that majority of S. aureus isolates from bovine mastitis cases can form biofilm in vitro by this assay [45–47]. In another study, half of S. aureus isolates from dairy cows with subclinical mastitis were able to produce biofilm by the CRA method [48, 49].
Table 7.
Biofilm forming ability of Staphylococcus aureus strains
| S.No | Detection of biofilm | Staphylococcus aureus | MRSA (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Congo Red Agar (CRA) | 33.33% | 66.66 |
| 2 | Micro-titer plate Method (MTP) | 61.66% | 83.33 |
| 3 | Tube Method (TM) | 0 | 50 |
| 4 | icaA gene | 100% | 100 |
| 5 | icaD gene | 100% | 100 |
The most important genes involved at different stages of the biofilm are ica, bap and agr genes. In this study all the isolates were found to carry icaA and icaD genes (Table 7 and Fig. 3). The bap gene has been found exclusively in isolates from bovine mastitis [17]. The intercellular gene cluster adhesion operon (ica) has been found in 40% of S. aureus isolates from bovine mastitis by analyzing their biofilm forming abilities within the microtiter assay and then sequencing the isolates [50]. However, whether the isolates carrying the ica genes actually produce biofilm in vitro, depends on the biofilm assay. Some studies found that even if the isolates carried the ica genes, not all of the isolates produced biofilm in the microtiter plate [3] and that some isolates would form black colonies (indicating slime formation) when grown on CRA plates but not necessarily form biofilm in the microtiter assay [15]. A study found that over 90% of isolates carried icaADBC genes and of these 25% carried the bap genes. When the isolates were positive for both icaADBC and bap, they were strong biofilm producers in vitro, however, when only positive for icaADBC, they produced less biofilm. However, in other studies, the bap gene was not found at all in S. aureus isolates from bovine mastitis cases [3, 4].
Fig. 3.

Agarose gel (1.5%) electrophoresis analysis showing PCR amplification product of 1315 and 381 base pair (bp) for the detection of icaA and icaD gene of biofilm positive isolates. M = 100 base pair ladder, Lane 1—negative control, Lane 2–4 icaD and lane 5–7 icaA positive isolates
Penicillin Resistance
All the S. aureus and MRSA strains were resistant to penicillin both phenotypically by zone-edge test and genotypically by blaZ gene PCR (Fig. 4). This is in agreement with the other studies which found 85–100% presence of penicillin resistance isolates in bovine mastitis [39, 43, 51, 52]. The Penicillin resistance is an important virulence determinant in mastitis caused by S. aureus in bovines. The presence of β-lactamase (blaZ) gene is shown to influence the prognosis of bovine mastitis. Surprisingly, successful treatment rates are low when mastitis is caused by a penicillin-resistant strain, even when the treatment is not based on antibiotics of the β -lactam family. Since penicillin-resistance determinants are borne by pathogenicity islands, this phenotype may be accompanied by other virulence genes, which could explain this phenomenon [5, 6].
Fig. 4.
Agarose gel (1.5%) electrophoresis analysis showing PCR amplification product of 518 base pair (bp) for the detection of blaZ gene of Staphylococcus aureus. M = 100 base pair ladder, Lane 1–18 blaZ positive isolates
Antibiotic Sensitivity Profile of Staphylococcus aureus
A total of 18 S. aureus isolates were studied for antimicrobial susceptibility against the 11 different categories of antimicrobial agents by disk diffusion assay. Except for the penicillin resistance, at least 70% of S. aureus strains were sensitive to all the antimicrobial agents tested (Fig. 5). Only 33.33% of the strains had the MAR index above 0.2. The MAR index greater than 0.2 implies the origin of the isolate from a high-risk source of contamination where antibiotics are often used [53, 54].
Fig. 5.
Susceptibility pattern of the Staphylococcus aureus isolates to the antimicrobial agents in the disk diffusion assay
A third of the isolates were found to be pan-susceptible to all the antimicrobial agents except for penicillin used in this study. The pan-susceptible nature of the S. aureus from bovine mastitis milk has been widely reported [55–58]. It has been proposed that the dairy industry does not strongly promote the emergence of antibiotic-resistant S. aureus, despite the widespread use of antibiotics for treating bovine mastitis. It has been speculated that this reflects the ability of bovine strains to invade and survive within bovine mammary epithelial cells, a niche which may have a markedly reduced antibiotic selective pressure [59].
All the 6 MRSA isolates can be designated as multi-drug resistant (MDR) by virtue of being MRSA (Fig. 6) and had a MAR index of ≥ 0.2.
Fig. 6.
Susceptibility pattern of the MRSA isolates to the antimicrobial agents in the disk diffusion assay
In one Russian study the isolates (n = 21) were resistant to erythromycin (100%), gentamicin (75%), penicillin (62.5%), and ciprofloxacin (25.5%). However, all the isolates were sensitive to Oxacillin (1 μg) in disk diffusion assay [60]. Antibiotic sensitivity profiling revealed the majority of the strains (n = 24) to be multidrug resistant and eleven strains showed reduced susceptibility to vancomycin (MICs = 2 μg/ml). In another study from Southern India the isolates (n = 39) showed high resistance rates towards clindamycin (76.92%), erythromycin (64.10%), ampicillin (56.41%), tetracycline (41.02%) and ciprofloxacin (35.89%) whereas low resistance was seen against rifampicin (20.51%) and gentamicin (15.38%). All strains (n = 39) were oxacillin sensitive, but 19 strains were positive for the mecA gene, which revealed the occurrence of oxacillin susceptible mecA positive strains (OS-MRSA) for the first time from India [39]. While the antimicrobial susceptibility study in Bangladesh revealed that 79.3% S. aureus strains were resistant to at least one antimicrobial, 49.0% to two or more antimicrobials, and clinical isolates showed more resistance to all tested antibiotics. The highest resistance rate was found to oxytetracycline, and no resistance to ceftriaxone and azithromycin [61].
In recently published systematic review and meta-analysis of antimicrobial resistance of S. aureus isolated from bovine mastitis, the highest overall prevalence of resistant S. aureus was against penicillin, followed by clindamycin, erythromycin, and gentamicin. Ceftiofur and cephalotin presented the lowest overall prevalence of antimicrobial resistance. The AMR to almost all the antimicrobials evaluated presented an increasing pattern over time, more apparent from 2009 onwards. The antimicrobials with a higher increase in their AMR prevalence over time were clindamycin, gentamycin, and oxacillin. Africa, Asia and Latin America were the continents with higher AMR to most compounds included in this study. No differences in AMR were detected regarding the clinical origin of the isolates (subclinical vs clinical mastitis) for almost all antibiotics evaluated [62].
Conclusion
Mastitis is a costly disease not only to the dairy farmer but also to the dairy industry and consumer. Depending upon the strain, the mastitis caused by S. aureus can be peracute to chronic and therefore, may require treatment during lactation and dry period as well. The presence of methicillin and penicillin resistance in the biofilm forming S. aureus strains will complicate the treatment outcomes as the prevention and control of mastitis is mainly antibiotic based in the region. It could also have One Health implications. Further study of these S. aureus and MRSA strains using whole genome or by traditional method for spa typing, Multi-Locus Sequence Type (MLST) and SCCmec typing (for MRSA strains) will help to understand their population structure and the zoonotic potential. The MIC values of the antibiotics used in the study will provide the better understanding about the Epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) values of the strains which would be more helpful in treatment decisions.
Acknowledgements
Authors acknowledge the Dean, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Rewa for the research facilities provided.
Authors Contributions
SR carried out sample collection, lab experiments, and writing of the manuscript. NS and AS gave design, supervision, and revision of the manuscript. SS and PKS supervised the research work and revised the article. AKN and RR contributed in lab experiments and manuscript writing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
The authors thank the MP Council of Science and Technology, Bhopal, MP, India (F. No.: R and D(BS)/17–18/19) for their support in the form of research grant.
Data Availability
All datasets are presented in the main manuscript.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors do not have any competing interest.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Rainard P, Foucras G, Fitzgerald JR, Watts JL, Koop G, Middleton JR (2018) Knowledge gaps and research priorities in Staphylococcus aureus mastitis control. Transbound Emerg Dis 65:149–165. 10.1111/tbed.12698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lister JL, Horswill AR (2014) Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: recent developments in biofilm dispersal. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:1–9. 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Szweda P, Schielmann M, Milewski S, Frankowska A, Jakubczak A (2012) Biofilm production and presence of ica and bap genes in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from cows with mastitis in the eastern poland. Polish J Microbiol 61:65–69. 10.33073/pjm-2012-009 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Melchior MB, van Osch MHJ, Lam TJGM, Vernooij JCM, Gaastra W, Fink-Gremmels J (2011) Extended biofilm susceptibility assay for Staphylococcus aureus bovine mastitis isolates: evidence for association between genetic makeup and biofilm susceptibility. J Dairy Sci 94:5926–5937. 10.3168/jds.2011-4243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Barkema HW, Schukken YH, Zadoks RN (2006) Invited review: the role of cow, pathogen, and treatment regimen in the therapeutic success of bovine Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. J Dairy Sci 89:1877–1895. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72256-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Haveri M, Hovinen M, Roslöf A, Pyörälä S (2008) Molecular types and genetic profiles of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from bovine intramammary infections and extramammary sites. J Clin Microbiol 46:3728–3735. 10.1128/JCM.00769-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Constable PD, Hinchcliff KW, Done SH, Grünberg WBT-VM (2017) Diseases of the Mammary Gland. In: Saunders WB (ed) Veterinary Medicine, Eleventh Edition, pp 1904–2001 10.1016/B978-0-7020-5246-0.00020-6
- 8.EFSA (2012) Technical specifications on the harmonised monitoring and reporting of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella Campylobacter and indicator Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. bacteria transmitted through food. EFSA J. 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2742 [Google Scholar]
- 9.Barritt M (1936) The intensification of voges proskauer reaction by the addition of alpha-naphthol. J Pathol Bacteriol 42:441–454 [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hebert GA, Crowder CG, Hancock GA, Jarvis WR, Thornsberry C (1988) Characteristics of coagulase-negative staphylococci that help differentiate these species and other members of the family Micrococcaceae. J Clin Microbiol 26:1939–1949. 10.1128/jcm.26.10.1939-1949.1988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bio-Rad (2018) InstaGeneTM Matrix. https://www.bio-rad.com/sites/default/files/webroot/web/pdf/lsr/literature/LIT544.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2024.
- 12.Stegger M, Andersen PS, Kearns A, Pichon B, Holmes MA, Edwards G et al (2012) Rapid detection, differentiation and typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus harbouring either mecA or the new mecA homologue mecALGA251. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:395–400. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03715.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brakstad OG, Aasbakk K, Maeland JA (1992) Detection of Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the nuc gene. J Clin Microbiol 30:1654–1660. 10.1128/jcm.30.7.1654-1660.1992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Haveri M, Suominen S, Rantala L, Honkanen-Buzalski T, Pyörälä S (2005) Comparison of phenotypic and genotypic detection of penicillin G resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine intramammary infection. Vet Microbiol 106:97–102. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.12.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vasudevan P, Nair MKM, Annamalai T, Venkitanarayanan KS (2003) Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of bovine mastitis isolates of Staphylococcus aureus for biofilm formation. Vet Microbiol 92:179–185. 10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00360-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kaiser TDL, Pereira EM, dos Santos KRN, Maciel ELN, Schuenck RP, Nunes APF (2013) Modification of the congo red agar method to detect biofilm production by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 75:235–239. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.11.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cucarella C, Tormo MÁ, Úbeda C, Trotonda MP, Monzón M, Peris C et al (2004) Role of biofilm-associated protein Bap in the pathogenesis of bovine Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 72:2177–2185. 10.1128/IAI.72.4.2177-2185.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tremblay YDN, Lamarche D, Chever P, Haine D, Messier S, Jacques M (2013) Characterization of the ability of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from the milk of Canadian farms to form biofilms. J Dairy Sci 96:234–246. 10.3168/jds.2012-5795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stepanovic S, Vukovic D, Dakic I, Savic B, Svabic-vlahovic M (2000) A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation. J Microbiol Methods 40:175–179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG et al (2012) Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:268–281. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Watts JL (2019) Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals, 4th edn. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Pennsylvania, pp 1–200 [Google Scholar]
- 22.Singh M, Sharma A, Singh A (2013) Isolation and antibiogram of beta-hemolytic Staphylococcus aureus associated with bovine clinical mastitis. Haryana Vet 52:54–56 [Google Scholar]
- 23.Acharya KR, Brankston G, Slavic D, Greer AL (2021) Spatio-temporal variation in the prevalence of major mastitis pathogens isolated from bovine milk samples between 2008 and 2017 in Ontario Canada. Front Vet Sci 8:1–12. 10.3389/fvets.2021.742696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zadoks RN, Middleton JR, McDougall S, Katholm J, Schukken YH (2011) Molecular epidemiology of mastitis pathogens of dairy cattle and comparative relevance to humans. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 16:357–372. 10.1007/s10911-011-9236-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Markey B, Leonard F, Archambault M, Cullinane A, Maguire D (2013) Clinical veterinary microbiology, 2nd edn. Mosby Elsevier, London, pp 105–119 [Google Scholar]
- 26.Boerlin P, Kuhnert P, Hüssy D, Schaellibaum M (2003) Methods for identification of Staphylococcus aureus isolates in cases of bovine mastitis. J Clin Microbiol 41:767–771. 10.1128/JCM.41.2.767-771.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lam TJG (2008) Mastitis control FROM SCIENCE Mastitis control. In: Proceedings of international conference, The Hague, the Netherlands.
- 28.Monecke S, Kuhnert P, Hotzel H, Slickers P, Ehricht R (2007) Microarray based study on virulence-associated genes and resistance determinants of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from cattle. Vet Microbiol 125:128–140. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Younis A, Leitner G, Heller DE, Samra Z, Gadba R, Lubashevsky G et al (2000) Phenotypic characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in Israeli dairy herds. J Vet Med Ser B 47:591–597. 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2000.00389.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ryman VE, Kautz FM, Nickerson SC (2021) Case study: misdiagnosis of nonhemolytic Staphylococcus aureus isolates from cases of bovine mastitis as coagulase-negative staphylococci. Animals 11:1–8. 10.3390/ani11020252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kiedrowski MR, Horswill AR (2011) New approaches for treating staphylococcal biofilm infections. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1241:104–121. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06281.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Thammavongsa V, Missiakas DM, Schneewind O (2013) Staphylococcus aureus degrades neutrophil extracellular traps to promote immune cell death. Science 342:863–866. 10.1126/science.1242255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Haran KP, Godden SM, Boxrud D, Jawahir S, Bender JB, Sreevatsan S (2012) Prevalence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, isolated from bulk tank milk from minnesota dairy farms. J Clin Microbiol 50:688–695. 10.1128/JCM.05214-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ikawaty R, Brouwer EC, Jansen MD, van Duijkeren E, Mevius D, Verhoef J et al (2009) Characterization of dutch Staphylococcus aureus from bovine mastitis using a multiple locus variable number tandem repeat analysis. Vet Microbiol 136:277–284. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.10.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Prashanth K, Rao KR, Reddy VP, Saranathan R, Makki AR (2011) Genotypic characterization of staphylococcus aureus obtained from humans and bovine mastitis samples in India. J Glob Infect Dis 3:115–122. 10.4103/0974-777X.81686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zecconi A (2010) Staphylococcus aureus mastitis: what we need to know to control them. Isr J Vet Med 65:93–99 [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang D, Wang Z, Yan Z, Wu J, Ali T, Li J et al (2016) Bovine mastitis Staphylococcus aureus: antibiotic susceptibility profile, resistance genes and molecular typing of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive strains in china. Infect Genet Evol 31:9–16. 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.12.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shrivastava N, Sharma V, Shrivastav A, Nayak A, Rai AK (2018) prevalence and characterization of panton–valentine leukocidin-positive Staphylococcus aureus in bovine milk in Jabalpur district of Madhya Pradesh India. Vet World 11:316–320. 10.14202/vetworld.2018.316-320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mistry H, Sharma P, Mahato S, Saravanan R, Kumar PA, Bhandari V (2016) Prevalence and characterization of oxacillin susceptible meca-positive clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus causing bovine mastitis in India. PLoS One 11:1–7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0162256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Panahi M, Saei HD (2019) Genetic diversity and methicillin resistance of Staphylococcus aureus originating from buffaloes with mastitis in Iran. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 62:19–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Aires-de-Sousa M (2017) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among animals: current overview. Clin Microbiol Infect 23:373–380. 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sakwinska O, Giddey M, Moreillon M, Morisset D, Waldvogel A, Moreillon P (2011) Staphylococcus aureus host range and human-bovine host shift. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:5908–5915. 10.1128/AEM.00238-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Annamanedi M, Sheela P, Sundareshan S, Isloor S, Gupta P, Jasmeen P et al (2021) Molecular fingerprinting of bovine mastitis-associated Staphylococcus aureus isolates from India. Sci Rep 11:1–15. 10.1038/s41598-021-94760-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Shrivastava N, Sharma V, Nayak A, Shrivastava AB, Sarkhel BC, Shukla PC et al (2017) prevalence and characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) mastitis in dairy cattle in Jabalpur Madhya Pradesh. J Anim Res 7:77. 10.5958/2277-940x.2017.00011.0 [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bissong MEA, Ateba CN (2020) Genotypic and phenotypic evaluation of biofilm production and antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from milk, North West Province South Africa. Antibiot 9:2020. 10.3390/antibiotics9040156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Darwish SF, Asfour HAE (2013) Investigation of biofilm forming ability in staphylococci causing bovine mastitis using phenotypic and genotypic assays. Sci World J 2013:2013. 10.1155/2013/378492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Notcovich S, DeNicolo G, Flint SH, Williamson NB, Gedye K, Grinberg A et al (2018) Biofilm-forming potential of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in new zealand. Vet Sci. 10.3390/vetsci5010008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Castelani L, Pilon LE, Martins T, Pozzi CR, Arcaro JRP (2015) Investigation of biofilm production and icaA and icaD genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from heifers and cows with mastitis. Anim Sci J 86:340–344. 10.1111/asj.12284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dhanawade NB, Kalorey DR, Srinivasan R, Barbuddhe SB, Kurkure NV (2010) Detsection of intercellular adhesion genes and biofilm production in Staphylococcusaureus isolated from bovine subclinical mastitis. Vet Res Commun 34:81–89. 10.1007/s11259-009-9326-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rumi MV, Huguet MJ, Bentancor AB, Gentilini ER (2013) The icaA gene in staphylococci from bovine mastitis. J Infect Dev Ctries 7(7):556–560. 10.3855/jidc.2670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jeykumar M, Vinodkumar G, Bashir BP, Krovvidi S (2013) Antibiogram of mastitis pathogens in the milk of crossbred cows in Namakkal district Tamilnadu. Vet World 6:354–356. 10.5455/vetworld.2013.354-356 [Google Scholar]
- 52.Preethirani PL, Isloor S, Sundareshan S, Nuthanalakshmi V, Deepthikiran K, Sinha AY et al (2015) Isolation, biochemical and molecular identification, and in-vitro antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacteria isolated from bubaline subclinical mastitis in South India. Plos One 10:1–15. 10.1371/journal.pone.0142717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Paul S, Bezbaruah RL, Roy MK, Ghosh AC (1997) Multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index and its reversion in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Lett Appl Microbiol 24:169–171. 10.1046/j.1472-765X.1997.00364.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Shrestha A, Bhattarai RK, Luitel H, Karki S, Basnet HB (2021) Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and pattern of antimicrobial resistance in mastitis milk of cattle in Chitwan. Nepal BMC Vet Res 17:1–7. 10.1186/s12917-021-02942-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Coelho SMO, Reinoso E, Pereira IA, Soares LC, Demo M, Bogni C et al (2009) Virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in Rio de Janeiro. Pesqui Vet Bras 29:369–374. 10.1590/s0100-736x2009000500002 [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ren Q, Liao G, Wu Z, Lv J, Chen W (2020) Prevalence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from subclinical bovine mastitis in southern Xinjiang China. J Dairy Sci 103:3368–3380. 10.3168/jds.2019-17420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Schmidt T, Kock MM, Ehlers MM (2015) Diversity and antimicrobial susceptibility profiling of staphylococci isolated from bovine mastitis cases and close human contacts. J Dairy Sci 98:6256–6269. 10.3168/jds.2015-9715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Greening SS, Zhang J, Midwinter AC, Wilkinson DA, McDougall S, Gates MC et al (2021) The genetic relatedness and antimicrobial resistance patterns of mastitis-causing staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from New Zealand dairy cattle. Vet Sci 8:287. 10.3390/vetsci8110287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Spoor LE, McAdam PR, Weinert LA, Rambaut A, Hasman H, Aarestrup FM et al (2013) Livestock origin for a human pandemic clone of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. MBio. 10.1128/mBio.00356-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Fursova K, Sorokin A, Sokolov S, Dzhelyadin T, Shulcheva I, Shchannikova M et al (2020) Virulence factors and phylogeny of staphylococcus aureus associated with bovine mastitis in Russia based on genome sequences. Front Vet Sci 7:1–10. 10.3389/fvets.2020.00135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hoque MN, Das ZC, Rahman ANMA, Haider MG, Islam MA (2018) Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains in bovine mastitis milk in Bangladesh. Int J Vet Sci Med 6:53–60. 10.1016/j.ijvsm.2018.03.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Molineri AI, Camussone C, Zbrun MV, Suárez Archilla G, Cristiani M, Neder V et al (2021) Antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Vet Med. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All datasets are presented in the main manuscript.




