Abstract
Aim
This study aims to investigate the seroconversion of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women during their first and third trimesters, specifically during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methodology
This is a longitudinal follow-up study of pregnant women during the second peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients in their first trimester (six to 12 weeks) were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG levels, with a repeat test conducted in the third trimester (28-40 weeks) using the automated VIDAS® (bioMérieux SA, Marcy-l'Étoile, France) system. Samples were compared to assess seroconversion rates.
Results
In the current study, 120 of the 298 eligible women were followed through to the third trimester. Seroconversion of SARS-CoV-2 IgG from the first to third trimester was observed in 28 women (23.3%), including six women (21.4%) who developed SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in the third trimester, and 22 women (78.5%) who were IgG positive in the first trimester but became IgG negative by the third trimester. Seroconversion of SARS-CoV-2 IgM from the first to third trimester was observed in 15 women (12.5%), of whom three women (25%) developed SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibodies in the third trimester, while 12 women (80%) who had these antibodies earlier no longer retained them by the third trimester.
Conclusions
The seroconversion rate during pregnancy is high, and natural immunity acquired through infection may not provide long-term protection, even over the course of the pregnancy.
Keywords: covid antibodies, pandemic, pregnancy, sero-epidemiological, vaccination
Introduction
The understanding of COVID-19, including its defining characteristics and infectivity, has improved significantly over the past two years. However, the immunological response to COVID-19 during pregnancy remains less well-defined. The WHO’s global research map for COVID-19 recommends population-level seroepidemiological studies to generate data on infection levels and inform containment strategies [1]. We previously published data on the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among first-trimester pregnant women during the second wave of the pandemic in India [2]. Seroepidemiology is a valuable tool for designing and monitoring vaccination programs [3-5]. In the context of pregnancy, seroepidemiological studies can guide preventive strategies, including vaccination planning. This study aims to investigate the seroconversion of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant women during their first and third trimesters of the pandemic, with findings that could inform policy decisions regarding vaccination and potential fetal transmission.
Materials and methods
This was a longitudinal observational study of pregnant women who had not been formally diagnosed with COVID-19 in the past three months, visiting the rural center of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, India, during the second peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, from April 2021 to August 2021. Inclusion criteria were (1) low-risk pregnant women who had not been diagnosed with COVID-19 infection in the past three months; (2) participants willing to follow up; and (3) participants willing to get tested twice during the study period for SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies. Exclusion criteria were (1) pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 infection in the past three months; (2) multiple pregnancies; (3) participants who refused to follow up or get tested during the study period; and (4) women who received the COVID-19 vaccine.
Data on demographic characteristics and COVID-19-related symptoms were collected using a structured questionnaire by a professional healthcare worker. Patients in the first trimester (six to 12 weeks) were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG levels, and a repeat test for the same was done in the third trimester (28-40 weeks). VIDAS® (bioMérieux SA, Marcy-l'Étoile, France) SARS-CoV-2 IgM (qualitative) and VIDAS® SARS-CoV-2 IgG II (semi-quantitative) assays were used with the automated VIDAS® system to detect IgM and IgG, respectively, in both the first and third trimesters.
Samples from the first trimester were compared to those collected in the third trimester from the same patient to interrogate seroconversion rates. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethical committee via approval no. IEC-38/08.01.2021, stating “Approved from ethical angle prospectively w.e.f 27th Jan 2021.” Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Data analysis was carried out using Stata version 16.0 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas, USA). Quantitative variables were expressed as the mean ± SD, and qualitative categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentages. Mean values of normally distributed data were compared using the Student’s t-test. Qualitative variables were compared using the χ² test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.
Results
In the current study, of the 298 eligible women, 120 were followed through to the third trimester. Participants’ gestational age at booking ranged from six to 20 weeks. The average age of the participants was 24 years, and the average BMI was 22.52 kg/m². Most participants were homemakers, and none were smokers. Additionally, none had comorbidities such as autoimmune disease, essential hypertension, chronic kidney disease, or type 1 or type 2 diabetes, with the exception of one participant who had hypertension. None had a family history of diabetes mellitus or hypertension. The study population was considered low-risk because the rural center primarily caters to low-risk patients, with high-risk patients being referred to higher-level centers. Demographic details are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Demographic data of the study population.
Characteristics | IgG positive (n = 72) | IgG negative (n = 48) | p-value | IgM positive (n = 14) | IgM negative (n = 106) | p-value |
Mean age in years | 24.26 | 23.47 | 0.3254 | 23.35 | 24.02 | 0.5821 |
Mean gestational age at booking | 14.1 | 13.5 | 0.4485 | 13.5 | 14 | 0.8012 |
Mean BMI (kg/m²) | 22.86 | 22.36 | 0.5121 | 25 | 22.21 | 0.9 |
Multiparity | 15 | 9 | 0.579 | 2 | 22 | 0.9 |
None of the women initially presented with symptoms; however, all were questioned about possible signs of infection in the past month. This revealed that 12 women (10%) reported fever, six (5%) had a cough, three (2.5%) experienced shortness of breath, three (2.5%) had a sore throat, three (2.5%) had fever with cough, one (0.83%) had fever with shortness of breath, and one (0.83%) had fever with headache. None of the women experienced lethargy, vomiting, joint pain, diarrhea, rhinorrhea, loss of taste or smell, or any other symptoms. Nasopharyngeal and throat swabs for COVID-19 RT-PCR were negative for all participants. None were aware of any exposure to a COVID-19 case at home, in the community, or in the hospital, and none had a history of traveling abroad. The prevalence of antibodies in relation to symptomatology among the participants is shown in Table 2 and Table 3. No significant correlation was found between the presence or absence of symptoms and antibody status.
Table 2. Prevalence of IgG antibodies in relation to symptomatology among the participants.
Status of symptoms | IgG positive (%) | IgG negative (%) | Exact significance (two-sided) |
Symptoms present | 11 (15.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0.9 |
Symptoms absent | 61 (84.7%) | 48 (100%) | |
Total | 72 (100%) | 48 (100%) |
Table 3. Prevalence of IgM antibodies in relation to symptomatology among the participants.
Status of symptoms | IgM positive (%) | IgM negative (%) | Exact significance (two-sided) |
Symptoms present | 1 (7.1%) | 17 (16%) | 0.691 |
Symptoms absent | 13 (92.9%) | 89 (84%) | |
Total | 14 (100%) | 106 (100%) |
Twenty-one women (17.5%) did not have either IgG or IgM antibodies, indicating they were at high risk of developing a COVID-19 infection. Seroconversion from the first to third trimester was observed in 28 women (23.3%). Of these, six women (21.4%) developed SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in the third trimester, while 22 women (78.5%) were IgG positive in the first trimester but became IgG negative in the third trimester (Table 4).
Table 4. Seroconversion of IgG antibodies from first trimester to third trimester.
IgG negative in the third trimester | IgG positive in the third trimester | Total | |
IgG negative in the first trimester | 26 (81.25%) | 6 (18.75%) | 32 (100%) |
IgG positive in the first trimester | 22 (25%) | 66 (75%) | 88 (100%) |
Total | 48 (40%) | 72 (60%) | 120 (100%) |
Seroconversion of SARS-CoV-2 IgM from the first to the third trimester was observed in 15 women (12.5%). Of these, three women (25%) developed SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibodies in the third trimester, while 12 women (80%) who had IgM antibodies in the first trimester no longer had them upon follow-up (Table 5).
Table 5. Seroconversion of IgM antibodies from first trimester to third trimester.
IgM negative in the third trimester | IgM positive in the third trimester | Total | |
IgM negative in the first trimester | 94 (96.91%) | 3 (3.09%) | 97 (100%) |
IgM positive in the first trimester | 12 (52.17%) | 11 (47.83%) | 23 (100%) |
Total | 106 (88.33%) | 14 (11.67%) | 120 (100%) |
However, among the 11 women (9.1%) who remained IgM positive in the third trimester, six women (54.5%) also tested IgG positive.
Discussion
Our previous study of 220 pregnant women demonstrated the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the first trimester. Of the participants, 72.7% (n = 160) were SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive, 16.8% (n = 37) were SARS-CoV-2 IgM positive, and 16.9% (n = 27) were positive for both IgG and IgM. The average antibody titers found were 10.49 BAU/ml (±14.0) for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and 0.6 (±0.55) for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM non-neutralizing antibodies. ROC analysis for SARS-CoV-2 IgG positivity showed a cutoff value of 1.19, with a sensitivity of 99.3% (AUC 0.99, 95% CI) and specificity of 98.3% (AUC 0.99, 95% CI). Similarly, ROC analysis for SARS-CoV-2 IgM positivity showed a cutoff value of 1, with a sensitivity of 97.3% (AUC 0.99, 95% CI) and specificity of 98.9% (AUC 0.99, 95% CI) [2].
In the present study, approximately 15% of pregnant women seroconverted from negative to positive antibody status against SARS-CoV-2 between the first and third trimesters. This suggests that pregnant women may acquire SARS-CoV-2 antibodies during pregnancy, particularly in the third trimester. The seroconversion rates observed in our study are consistent with those reported by Crovetto et al., who found that approximately 15-20% of pregnant women exhibited seroconversion between the first and third trimesters [6]. Additionally, a study by Zhao et al. reported even higher seroconversion rates, especially among women with moderate to severe COVID-19 symptoms, where antibody production was both stronger and more persistent. This highlights that seroconversion rates and antibody levels may vary depending on disease severity [7].
Implications for vaccination policy
Our study’s finding that 78.5% of women who were IgG-positive in the first trimester became IgG-negative by the third trimester raises concerns about the durability of natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2. This suggests that the natural immune response may not provide long-term protection during pregnancy, emphasizing that reliance on natural infection alone is insufficient for safeguarding against the virus. In contrast, vaccination has been shown to elicit a robust immune response in pregnant women, and recent studies indicate that vaccines can confer passive immunity to the fetus [8]. The timing of vaccination is also crucial, with evidence suggesting that third-trimester vaccination optimizes the transfer of protective antibodies to the fetus.
Future research directions
Our study underscores the necessity for further research into the kinetics of immune responses in pregnant women, especially regarding vaccination. Future investigations could focus on determining the optimal timing for COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy to enhance fetal protection, as well as assessing the long-term outcomes for both mothers and infants. Additionally, exploring the role of booster doses during pregnancy would be valuable, considering the observed decline in antibody levels over time.
Limitations of the study
The outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in both the mother and fetus were not examined in the present study. Additionally, the study experienced an increased number of dropouts due to the pandemic conditions, resulting in a smaller sample size.
Conclusions
Observing seroprevalence in a vulnerable population is an essential tool for combating disease, managing resources, and communicating public health messages. This longitudinal observational study investigating the seroconversion of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in pregnant women during the second COVID-19 pandemic provides valuable insights into the evolution of natural immunity throughout pregnancy. Our findings show that while a significant proportion of women seroconvert during pregnancy - approximately 15% exhibit IgG and IgM seroconversion from the first to the third trimester - many women who were initially IgG-positive in the first trimester lose detectable antibody levels by the third trimester. This suggests that natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 may be short-lived in pregnant women.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists strongly recommends COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant individuals, as the risk of severe illness and death is elevated during pregnancy. Therefore, a key takeaway from our study is the importance of vaccination during pregnancy, not only to enhance and maintain a stable immune response but also to provide the potential for passive immunity transfer to the fetus.
Appendices
Proforma
Hospital Number: Patient Code: Name: Age: Gestational Age at Booking:
Pregnancy details Parity: Previous Delivery Details:
BMI: Ethnic Background:
Patient Occupation: Partner Occupation: Smoker:
Medical History:
Autoimmune Disease: Essential Hypertension: Diabetes Mellitus:
Chronic Kidney Disease: Assisted Reproduction: Multiple Pregnancy:
Pregnancy Interval > 10 years:
Family History:
Family History of PET Family History of DM (1st degree relative)
Previous Pregnancy Complication
Previous Pregnancy induced Hypertension/ PET
Previous GDM
Previous stillbirth
Previous IUGR
Previous baby 4.5kg or above
First trimester visit
Blood Group: Hemogram: HIV: HbsAg: VDRL: TSH: HBA1C: Urine microscopy:
COVID-19 Negative/ Positive:
Blood test for COVID antibody: IgM Titres: IgG Titres:
Symptoms of COVID-19 in 1st Trimester:
Fever Vomiting Cough Diarrhoea Rhinorrhoea Sore throat Headache Lethargy Joint pain Loss of taste / smell Other symptoms Exposure in community Exposure in hospital Travel abroad
Needing assessment in Bacterial infection including chest Venous Thromboembolism (PE/DVT) Need for oxygen Needing admission to hospital need for intubation Admission to ICU
COVID-19 Treatment in 1st Trimester: COVID-19 Vaccination given: yes/no
Investigations in Current Pregnancy
NTNB Scan: Level II Scan:
Other Investigations:
Third trimester
Hemogram:
COVID-19 Negative/ Positive:
Blood test for COVID antibody: IgM titres: IgG titres:
Symptoms of COVID-19 in 2nd Trimester:
Fever Vomiting Cough Diarrhoea Rhinorrhoea Sore throat Headache Lethargy Joint pain Loss of taste / smell Other symptoms Exposure in community Exposure in hospital Travel abroad
Needing assessment in Bacterial infection including chest Venous Thromboembolism (PE/DVT) Need for oxygen
Needing admission to hospital need for intubation Admission to ICU
COVID-19 Treatment in 2nd Trimester: COVID-19 Vaccination given: yes/no
Funding Statement
The grants were received from the research funds of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institute Ethics Committee, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi issued approval IEC- 38/08.01.2021. Approved from ethical angle prospectively w.e.f 27th Jan 2021.
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: The grants were received from the research funds of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Anapti Anil, Kandala Aparna Sharma, Nilanchali Singh, Sara Hillman, Purva Mathur, Kapil Yadav, Shivam Pandey, Vatsla Dadhwal
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Anapti Anil, Kandala Aparna Sharma, Nilanchali Singh, Sara Hillman, Purva Mathur, Kapil Yadav, Shivam Pandey, Vatsla Dadhwal, Saloni Kamboj
Drafting of the manuscript: Anapti Anil, Kandala Aparna Sharma, Nilanchali Singh, Sara Hillman, Purva Mathur, Saloni Kamboj
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Anapti Anil, Kandala Aparna Sharma, Nilanchali Singh, Sara Hillman, Purva Mathur, Kapil Yadav, Shivam Pandey, Vatsla Dadhwal
Supervision: Anapti Anil, Kandala Aparna Sharma, Nilanchali Singh, Shivam Pandey, Vatsla Dadhwal, Saloni Kamboj
References
- 1.A coordinated global research roadmap: 2019 novel coronavirus. 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/a-coordinated-global-research-roadmap https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/a-coordinated-global-research-roadmap
- 2.Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among first-trimester pregnant women during the second wave of the pandemic in India. Sharma KA, Singh N, Hillman S, et al. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;160:74–78. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ten years of serological surveillance in England and Wales: methods, results, implications and action. Osborne K, Gay N, Hesketh L, Morgan-Capner P, Miller E. Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29:362–368. doi: 10.1093/ije/29.2.362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.The role of seroepidemiology in the comprehensive surveillance of vaccine-preventable diseases. Wilson SE, Deeks SL, Hatchette TF, Crowcroft NS. CMAJ. 2012;184:0–6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Seroepidemiology: an underused tool for designing and monitoring vaccination programmes in low- and middle-income countries. Cutts FT, Hanson M. Trop Med Int Health. 2016;21:1086–1098. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Seroprevalence and presentation of SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy. Crovetto F, Crispi F, Llurba E, Figueras F, Gómez-Roig MD, Gratacós E. Lancet. 2020;396:530–531. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31714-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019. Zhao J, Yuan Q, Wang H, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:2027–2034. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Covid-19 vaccination in pregnancy. Badell ML, Dude CM, Rasmussen SA, Jamieson DJ. BMJ. 2022;378:0. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]