Skip to main content
Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants logoLink to Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants
. 2024 Nov 23;30(11):1819–1827. doi: 10.1007/s12298-024-01526-6

Arabidopsis ubiquitin ligase PUB41 positively regulates ABA-mediated seed dormancy and drought response

Avinash Sharma 1,2, Shalev Goldfarb 1,2, Dina Raveh 1, Dudy Bar-Zvi 1,2,
PMCID: PMC11646239  PMID: 39687696

Abstract

Seed germination is a tightly regulated, non-reversible developmental process, and it is crucial to prevent premature germination under conditions that may not allow the plant’s life cycle to be completed. The plant hormone ABA is the key regulator of seed dormancy and inhibition of germination. ABA is also involved in the plant response to drought. Here we report on the involvement of Arabidopsis thaliana PUB41, encoding a U-BOX E3 ubiquitin ligase, in regulating ABA signaling, seed dormancy, germination, and drought resilience. AtPUB41 is expressed in most vegetative and reproductive tissues. AtPUB41 protein is localized in the cytosol and nucleus. pub41 T-DNA insertion mutants display reduced seed dormancy, and their germination is less inhibited by exogenous ABA than seeds of wild-type plants. pub41 mutant plants are also hypersensitive to drought. ABA induces AtPUB41 promoter activity and steady-state mRNA levels in the roots. Our data suggest that AtPUB41 is a positive regulator of ABA signaling.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12298-024-01526-6.

Keywords: Arabidopsis, PUB E3 ubiquitin ligase, ABA signaling, Dormancy, Germination, Drought

Introduction

As sessile organisms, plants are continuously exposed to fluctuating environments and have evolved mechanisms that modulate their growth and development in response to environmental cues. The plant hormone ABA is a key player in modulating these developmental processes, from the breaking of seed dormancy for germination (reviewed in Jones 2016), to the response to abiotic stresses, including drought (Ma et al. 2018).

ABA signaling pathways have been elucidated: ABA binds to the soluble receptors RCAR/PYR/PYL, which then bind and inhibit PP2C protein phosphatase. PP2C inactivation leads to the activation of SnRK protein kinase that phosphorylates and activates downstream transcription factors, leading to an alteration in gene expression conducive for coping with global environmental changes (Tang et al. 2015). Moreover, the ABA response mechanism involves a change in the cellular proteome, resulting in specific changes in protein translation and degradation. The Ubiquitin-Proteasome System (UPS) is a central mechanism for controlled protein degradation in all eukaryotes including plants (Vierstra 2009). A large part of the plant genome, about 5% in Arabidopsis, encodes UPS components, reflecting its pivotal role in maintaining proteome homeostasis. The majority of these genes (> 1400 in Arabidopsis) encodes E3s that specifically recognize and ubiquitinate target proteins (Vierstra 2009). The UPS has a major role in ABA signaling (Yu et al. 2016). For example, the protein levels of ABA receptors, PP2A proteases, and ABA-regulated transcription factors are controlled by ubiquitination-mediated degradation by the 26S proteasome (Yu et al. 2016).

Here, we present the role of the Arabidopsis U-box E3 ligase PUB41. AtPUB41 is a member of the Plant U-Box (PUB) family of E3s, possessing a U-box domain that binds the E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme and several repeats of the Armadillo (ARM) motif that bind the proteins targeted for proteasomal degradation (Trujillo 2018). PUBs have a major role in diverse biological processes, including development, immunity, and response to abiotic stress (reviewed by Vierstra 2009; Trujillo 2018). Here we show that the stress hormone ABA enhances the promoter activity of AtPUB41 and the steady-state levels of this gene transcript. Furthermore, we show that AtPUB41 is important for seed dormancy, germination, and the drought response: seeds of pub41 mutants show reduced ability to maintain dormancy, and their germination is less sensitive to exogenous ABA. In addition, pub41 T-DNA mutant plants are less resilient to drought than wild-type plants.

Materials and methods

Plant material

Homozygous Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia was used in this study. T-DNA insertion lines pub41-1 (SALK_099012) and pub41-2 (SALK_142012) were obtained from the Arabidopsis Resource Center, Columbus, Ohio. The presence of T-DNA insertion was confirmed by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) using T-DNA and gene-specific primers, further confirmed by Sanger sequencing of the PCR product. Primers are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

Plant growth conditions

Plants were cultivated at 22 °C, with a relative humidity of 50%, following a circadian cycle of 12 h light and 12 h dark. Seeds were surface sterilized and stratified at 4 °C for at least 4 days before they were sown on solid 0.5 × Murashige and Skoog (MS) + 0.5% (w/v) sucrose or in pots as described previously (Adler et al. 2017). Post-germination, application of ABA was performed by transferring with forceps plate-grown 7-days-old seedlings to Petri dishes containing Whatman No. 1 paper soaked in 0.5 × MS and with the indicated concentration of ABA. Plates were then incubated for 8 h in the light at room temperature.

Seed germination

Surface-sterilized cold-treated seeds were sown in Petri dishes containing 0.5 × MS and 0.7% agar, and the indicated ABA concentrations. Plates were incubated at 22 °C in a 12 h light/12 h dark regime. Radicle emergence was assessed under a dissecting microscope. Seeds that developed ≥ 1 mm long radicles were scored as germinated.

Drought tolerance

Plants were grown for 3 weeks in pots containing equal amounts of potting mix under non-stress conditions. Water was then withheld, and plant wilting and drying were visually followed daily. Upon wilting of the plant of the sensitive genotypes (approximately 2 weeks), both wild-type and mutant plants were rewatered, and plant survival was visually scored 4 days later.

Transcript levels

RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, primer design, and RT-qPCR assays for determining relative steady-state transcript levels were performed as previously described (Maymon et al. 2022). Primers are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

Plasmid construction, plant transformation, and transient expression

The 35S::PUB41-eGFP plasmid was constructed by amplifying the DNA sequence encoding full-length PUB41 with primers containing linkers with the NcoI and PstI restriction sites. This sequence was subcloned into the respective restriction sites of the pGA-eGFP3 vector (Maymon et al. 2022) in frame with the sequence encoding eGFP.

To construct AtPUB41::GUS expressing lines, a 1440 bp DNA fragment upstream to the start codon of the PUB41 gene was amplified using the primers listed in Supplemental Table S1 and genomic DNA of wild-type Arabidopsis plants. The amplified AtPUB41 promoter DNA fragment was sub-cloned into the PstI and EcoRI restriction sites of pCAMBIA 1391Z upstream to the GUS encoding sequence.

Plasmids were verified by DNA sequencing and introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101, and wild-type Arabidopsis plants were transformed by the floral dip method (Clough and Bent 1998). Homozygous transformants were isolated by selection on plates containing growth medium supplemented with hygromycin. Primers are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

Transient expression in Nicotiana benthamiana by leaf infiltration of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and detection of the expressed proteins by fluorescence microscopy were performed as described by Eisner et al. (2021).

GUS staining

Plant tissues, after treatment, were fixed into acetone chilled at - 20 °C, and GUS staining was performed as described (Jefferson 1987). Images were taken using a dissecting microscope equipped with a Dino-Eye: AM7025X Edge Series 5MP Eyepiece Camera.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were carried out in at least 3 biological repeats. Data are expressed as average ± SE. Statistical significance was determined using Tukey’s HSD post hoc test and the Student’s t-test.

Results and discussion

Domain structure and cellular localization of AtPUB41

The Arabidopsis PUB41 gene (At5G62560) is an intronless gene that encodes a 559 amino-acid long E3 of the Plant-U-box (PUB) family. AtPUB41 has ubiquitin ligase activity (Wiborg et al. 2008). Motif analysis of the amino acid sequence of AtPUB41 indicates a U-box motif at residues 30–104, and a cluster of 5 ARM motifs located between residues 266–305, 307–346, 348–388, 390–427 and 428–472 (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Domain organization and subcellular localization of AtPUB41. A. Diagram presenting the linear amino-acid sequence of AtPUB41 and functional motifs. Numbers represent the respective amino acids. BD. Subcellular localization of AtPUB41. Leaves of N. benthamiana were infiltrated with Agrobacteria harboring 35S::AtPUB41-eGFP. Lower epidermis peels were prepared and counterstained with the DNA marker DAPI, and GFP fluorescence (B) and DAPI (C) were analyzed by confocal microscopy. (D), merged image of (B) and (C). White and yellow arrows point at nuclei and transvacuolar cytoplasmic strands, respectively. Scale bar = 50 µm

To assess the subcellular localization of the AtPUB41 protein, we transiently expressed AtPUB41-eGFP in leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana. Lower epidermis peels were counterstained with the DNA binding stain DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole), and cells were examined by confocal fluorescence microscopy. AtPUB41-eGFP was detected in the nucleus and the cytoplasm (Fig. 1). The cytoplasmic localization of AtPUB41 is supported by its presence in transvacuolar cytoplasmic strands (Fig. 1B), and the nuclear localization is demonstrated by colocalization of the AtPUB41-GFP signal with that of the DNA fluorescent stain (Fig. 1D). The NLS mapper (Kosugi et al. 2009) supports the nuclear import of AtPUB41, indicating three presumptive nuclear localization signals (NLSs) at residues 3–32, 165–194, and 256–287, with scores of 3.7, 3.5, and 3.2, respectively, supporting our experimental demonstration of its nuclear localization.

Promoter activity of AtPUB41

Only limited expression data for AtPUB41 is available as the AT5G62560 locus was not included in the Affymetrix ATH1 microarrays. Therefore to examine the activity of the AtPUB41 promoter, we transformed Arabidopsis plants with a plasmid encoding the β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene driven by the AtPUB41 promoter (AtPUB41::GUS), comprising 1440 bp upstream of the translation start codon. Plants of three independent homozygous lines were analyzed. Under controlled optimal growth conditions, the AtPUB41 promoter was predominantly active in cotyledons, leaf vascular tissue, petioles, hydathodes, axillary buds, stems, and roots (Fig. 2A). High promoter activity was observed in embryos (Fig. 2B) and endosperm (Fig. 2C) of imbibed seeds. AtPUB41 promoter activity was detected in fully expanded leaves (Fig. 2E–G), where, in addition to vascular tissue, notable expression was detected in trichomes and stomata guard cells (Fig. 2E–G). The AtPUB41 promoter activity was also present in the root hairs of the collet (Fig. 2D) and root maturation zone (Fig. 2I). In mature plants, promoter activity was detected in sepals, pistils, anther filaments, and mature siliques (Fig. 2J–K). In contrast, promoter activity was not detected in the root elongation zone, mature anthers, or petals (Fig. 1D, H, J). Moreover, our RT-qPCR analysis of 10-days-old seedlings revealed a higher expression of AtPUB41 in roots than in shoots, indicating a role for PUB41 in root tissue (Fig. 2L).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Tissue specificity of AtPUB41 expression. (AK) Arabidopsis plants expressing GUS reporter gene from the AtPUB41 promoter stained for GUS activity. A. 8-days old seedling. The arrow marks the hydathode (H). B. Embryo rescued from imbibed seed. C. Endosperm cells in imbibed seed. D. 36-h-old Arabidopsis seedling. Arrow points to promoter activity in collet region root hairs (C). E & F. Sections of fully expanded leaves. Arrows point to trichomes (T). G. Stomata. H. Root tip and root meristem zone of the primary root. I. Mature root hairs of the maturation zone. J. Open flower: A, anther; F, anther-filament; P, petal; S, sepal; K. Silique. Bars: A, B, C, E, F, H, I, 0.1 mm; G, K, 0.05 mm; D, J, 0.25 mm. L. Relative AtPUB41 transcript levels. The roots and shoots of 10-days-old wild-type seedlings grown on 0.5 × MS without supplements were harvested, RNA was isolated, and PUB41-transcript levels were determined, by RT-qPCR using primers #8, 9, 14 and 15 (Table S1). Data showing mean ± SE of three repeats. Asterisks denote statistical significance as determined by a two-tailed paired student’s t-test (p ≤ 0.002)

pub41 T-DNA insertion lines

Two pub41 T-DNA insertion mutants were obtained from the Arabidopsis stock center, Columbus, Ohio. SALK_099012C and SALK_142330 are designated as pub41-1 and pub41-2, respectively (Fig. 3A). The mutants were verified by PCR analysis using gene-specific and T-DNA border primers (Supplemental Table S1), as described earlier (O’Malley et al. 2015). Only the pub41-1 and pub41-2 lines yielded a product of ~ 500 bp with the LBb1.3 and RP primers (Fig. 3B). The amplified PCR product was subsequently used for Sanger sequencing to identify the precise location of the T-DNA insertion. The sequencing results revealed that the T-DNA inserted within the protein-encoding region (+ 1505 bp downstream from the start codon) in pub41-1, and within the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) (-69 bp upstream of the start codon in the pub41-2 mutant (Fig. 3A). RT-qPCR analysis using primers #8, 9, 14 and 15 (Table S1), further confirmed that the transcript levels of AtPUB41 in both mutants are less than 18% that of the wild-type plants (Fig. 3C).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Molecular characterization of AtPUB41 T-DNA insertion lines. A Diagram of the AtPUB41 gene. Transcribed sequences are shown as boxes, where the black region marks the protein-encoding sequence, and the white regions mark 5′ and 3′ UTRs. T-DNA insertion sites of the respective mutants are marked by triangles. B Verification of the T-DNA insertion loci by PCR. Genomic DNA from the indicated genotypes was amplified using the T-DNA left border (LB) primer and site-specific left and right primers (LP1, LP2, and RP1, RP2) as indicated. C Steady-state levels of AtPUB41 transcripts in 5-days-old seedlings of wild-type (WT) and pub41 mutants. The data represent the mean ± SE of three independent experiments. Bars with different letters represent statistically different values by ordinary one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.001)

pub41 mutants are hypersensitive to drought

We screened 25 homozygous T-DNA mutants from the Arabidopsis Stock Center, that have T-DNA inserted into genes encoding E3s, for changes in drought resilience (see Methods). Our original screen to identify UPS-associated genes that affect drought resilience led to the identification of 3 PUB genes, AtPUB8, AtPUB46, and AtPUB41. Mutants were verified as described (O’Malley et al. 2015) and Fig. 3. The involvement of each of these genes was confirmed using a single T-DNA insertion mutant (Adler 2011). To further confirm the drought-hypersensitive phenotype of the pub41 mutant and to rule out the possibility that the drought hypersensitivity resulted from a positional effect, we repeated the water-withholding experiment using two independent pub41 mutants. Figure 4 shows that both pub41-1 and pub41-2 mutants are hypersensitive to drought, and under the protocol applied, they failed to recover from water-withholding stress, in contrast to the wild-type plants. These results show that AtPUB41 is essential for Arabidopsis drought stress resilience, and that Atpub41 mutants are impaired in their ability to adapt to stress conditions.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

pub41 mutant plants are more sensitive to drought than wild-type plants. Wild-type (WT) and pub41 mutant plants were grown in pots for 6 weeks before water was withheld for 12 days. Water was supplied only after the plants were fully wilted and the plants were imaged 4 days later in the recovery period

Ubiquitin ligases belonging to the PUB family are recognized for their involvement in the plant response to abiotic and biotic stresses (Trujillo 2018, 2021; Vierstra 2009). Interestingly, pub mutants affected in drought resilience are both hyper- or hypo-sensitive: single gene mutants of the Arabidopsis paralogs AtPUB46 and AtPUP48 (Adler et al. 2017), and the Atpub8 mutant (Adler 2011) are drought hypersensitive whereas Arabidopsis Atpub18, Atpub19, Atpub23, and Atpub24 mutants exhibit increased drought tolerance compared with wild-type plants (Seo et al. 2012). Also, the rice OsPUB7 knockout mutant and the Ospub41 suppression mutant, and Ubi:RNAi-OsPUB41 knock-down lines showed enhanced drought resilience (Kim et al. 2023; Seo et al. 2021). (Despite sharing a common gene name OsPUB41 is not orthologous to AtPUB41, but shows the highest similarity to AtPUB20 and AtPUB21).

Seed germination of pub41 mutants shows reduced ABA inhibitory effects

In addition to drought, ABA is also the primary hormone that ensures seed dormancy and represses germination (Bewley et al. 2013; Ma et al. 2018). We therefore examined the impact of ABA on germination of seeds of the pub41 mutants. Under normal growth conditions, the germination of pub41 mutants was similar to that of wild-type plants (Fig. 5A). However, the germination of seeds of the pub41-1 and pub41-2 mutant lines displayed reduced sensitivity to ABA inhibition compared with wild-type plants (Fig. 5B). For example, 52 h following plating on growth medium containing 2.5 μM ABA, 25.3% and 22.7% of seeds of the pub41-1 and pub41-2 mutants germinated compared with only 6.7% of the wild-type seeds.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Germination of pub41 mutants is less sensitive to ABA inhibition. Surface sterilized cold-treated seeds of the wild-type (WT) (■), pub41-1 (▲), and pub41-2 (●) genotypes were plated on agar-solidified 0.5 × MS 0.5% sucrose medium without (A) or with 2.5 µM ABA (B). Germination was scored at the indicated times. Data represent means ± SE of three independent biological repeats. Asterisks mark significant differences between the WT and mutant seeds according to Student’s unpaired t-test (p < 0.05)

Seeds of pub41 mutants show reduced dormancy

The rate of seed germination depends upon the speed of ABA degradation upon imbibition (Preston et al. 2009). Freshly collected Arabidopsis seeds display suppressed germination rates. Seed dormancy can be relieved with post-harvest storage time of dry seeds and can also be reversed by stratification of the seeds at any time point (Bewley et al. 2013). ABA is the primary hormone in the maintenance of dormancy, and gibberellins (GA) are the key players in germination (Gianinetti 2023). Thus, the ABA to GA ratio determines the fate of germination. Here we assayed germination using freshly collected non-stratified seeds. pub41-1 and pub41-2 seeds had higher germination rates compared with the corresponding wild-type seeds, indicating that in the absence of functional PUB41 there is a reduction in the ability to maintain dormancy (Fig. 6A). As expected, cold treatment of all tested genotypes broke dormancy and resulted in faster and similar kinetics of germination (Fig. 6B), supporting our interpretation that the differences in the germination of the non-treated seeds of the pub41 mutants and wild-type plants result from reduced dormancy of the pub41 mutants. Interestingly, a significant quantity of ABA is produced by a single layer of endosperm surrounding the embryo during germination (Karssen et al. 1983). This is compatible with the high PUB41 promoter activity in embryos and endosperm we observed above (Fig. 2B, C). Moreover, mutation of the AtPUB41 gene is expected to reduce plant fitness since reduced seed dormancy would result in early germination, threatening seedling survival during the harsh season, which is usually survived as a dormant seed that germinates only in environmental conditions favoring a completion of life cycle of the germinating seedling.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Germination of newly collected seeds. Freshly harvested, surface sterilized seeds of the wild-type (WT) (■), pub41-1 (▲), and pub41-2 (●) genotypes were plated on agar solidified 0.5 X MS 0.5% sucrose medium without pre-treatment (A) or after stratification (B). Germination was scored at the indicated times. Data represent means ± SE of three independent biological repeats. Asterisks mark significant differences between the WT and mutant seeds according to Student’s unpaired t-test (p < 0.05)

ABA induces the expression of AtPUB41

Although the ABA signaling system has been well developed to modify the expression of a variety of stress-related genes (Rock 2000), the hormone does not affect the expression of genes involved in ABA sensing (for example, see Pardo-Hernández et al. 2024). We thus treated seedlings with ABA and assayed the effect on AtPUB41 expression. Indeed, ABA treatment increases the steady-state levels of AtPUB41 transcript in the root by 250% (Fig. 7A). In histochemical staining of plants expressing AtPUB41::GUS (Fig. 7B–E), we observed that ABA treatment enhanced AtPUB41 promoter activity in the roots. Close to the root tip, AtPUB41 promoter activity was present in all cell types whereas in the upper root zone it was primarily in the vascular system (Fig. 7D, E). Thus, AtPUB41 behaves like a typical ABA-responsive gene whose expression is increased by this plant hormone.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

ABA induces AtPUB41 expression. A RT-qPCR results showing AtPUB41 transcript levels in roots of 10-days-old wild-type plants treated for 8 h without or with 10 µM ABA, using primers #12–14 (Table S1). Data show mean ± SE of three biological repeats. Asterisks denote statistical significance as determined by a two-tailed paired student’s t-test (p ≤ 0.05). BE One-week-old AtPUB41::GUS Arabidopsis seedlings were treated for 8 h without (B, C) or with 10 µM ABA D, E, followed by histological staining for GUS activity. B & D primary root tips; D, E differentiation zone of the primary roots. Bars, 0.1 mm

AtPUB41 is a positive regulator of ABA-mediated seed dormancy and drought response

Our findings show that AtPUB41 is a positive regulator of the ABA response. Germination of pub41 mutants was less inhibited by ABA (Fig. 5) and the seeds displayed reduced dormancy (Fig. 6). ABA signaling consists of many proteins possessing different activities in the pathway and the high redundancy of some of these proteins, e.g., the ABA receptor (Yu et al. 2016). Positive regulation of ABA signaling by the E3 may result from degrading protein(s), which play a negative role in the signaling pathway (Yu et al. 2016). Thus, we propose that AtPUB41 substrates include negative regulators of ABA signaling located in the cytoplasm and/or nucleus, in agreement with the localization of AtPUB41 (Fig. 1). Most PUB genes involved in the plant response to environmental stress function as negative regulators of the plant stress response, i.e., the mutants are more resilient to stress than the WT, and overexpressing the respective genes often results in hypersensitivity (for recent reviews see Trenner et al. 2022; Trujillo 2018). In contrast, fewer PUBs act as positive regulators of the abiotic stress response: We previously showed that the paralogous genes AtPUB46 and AtPUB48 are positive regulators of the drought response, with single mutants being hypersensitive to drought (Adler et al. 2017). AtPUB12 and AtPUB13 act as positive regulators of ABA signaling as their E3 proteins degrade the ABA co-receptor ABI1 (Footitt et al. 2011). Furthermore, AtPUB25 and AtPUB26 positively regulate freezing tolerance (Wang et al. 2019), and OsPUB67 is a positive regulator of drought tolerance (Qin et al. 2020).

PUB E3s have been implicated for their role in seed germination. Atpub9-KO mutants display hypersensitivity to ABA during seed germination (Samuel et al. 2008); suppression of the Arabidopsis AtPUB30 results in decreased inhibition of germination by NaCl (Hwang et al. 2015); AtPUB18 and AtPUB19 genes are involved in salt inhibition of germination, with germination of double mutant plants being less sensitive to NaCl (Bergler and Hoth 2011).

pub41 mutants are drought hypersensitive at the rosette stage and are less sensitive to ABA inhibition of germination than wild-type plants (Figs. 4 and 5). Similar phenotypes have been reported for other E3s, for example, single gene mutants of the paralogs Arabidopsis C3H2C3-type RING E3, Arabidopsis ABA-insensitive RING protein (AIRP) AtAIRP1, AtAIRP2, AtAIRP3 (Ryu et al. 2010; Cho et al. 2011; Kim and Kim 2013) and SALT- AND DROUGHT-INDUCED RING FINGER1 (SDIR1) (Zhang et al. 2007). In addition, mutants of the Arabidopsis F-box E3 ligases ABA-RESPONSE KELCH PROTEIN 1 (ARKP1) (Li et al. 2016), F-BOX OF FLOWERING 2 (FOF2) (Qu et al. 2020), EID1-like protein 3 (EDL3) (Koops et al. 2011) also exhibit this phenotype. Like PUB41, all these genes, except SDIR1, are induced by ABA.

AtPUB41 belongs to a 4 member-subfamily comprising AtPUB38-AtPUB41 (Wiborg et al. 2008). AtPUB40 was shown to mediate the root degradation of BZR1, a brassinosteroid-responsive transcription factor (Kim et al. 2019). Roots of the triple pub39 pub40 pub41 mutant accumulated higher levels of BZR1 than WT. Unfortunately, these authors did not study the phenotype of the Atpub41 single gene mutant, or AtPUB41 overexpressor; thus, the role of AtPUB41 in the brassinosteroid root signaling pathway remains unclear. Our data clearly show that AtPUB41 is a positive regulator of ABA signaling, affecting seed germination and the drought response. The AtPUB41 target(s) within the ABA signaling pathway remain to be identified.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

We thank Guy Adler and Lyad Zamir for their role in the preliminary studies of AtPUB41. The research was supported in part by a generous donations from Prof. Peter Coleman, USA. Dudy Bar-Zvi is the incumbent of The Israel and Bernard Nichunsky Chair in Desert Agriculture, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Ben-Gurion University.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Adler G, Konrad Z, Zamir L, Mishra AK, Raveh D, Bar-Zvi D (2017) The Arabidopsis paralogs, PUB46 and PUB48, encoding U-box E3 ubiquitin ligases, are essential for plant response to drought stress. BMC Plant Biol 17:8. 10.1186/s12870-016-0963-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adler G (2011) Plant response to environmental stresses: expression regulation of BvNHX1 and the role of AtPUB proteins. Dissertation, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
  3. Bergler J, Hoth S (2011) Plant U-box armadillo repeat proteins AtPUB18 and AtPUB19 are involved in salt inhibition of germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Biol 13:725–730. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00431.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cho SK, Ryu MY, Seo DH, Kang BG, Kim WT (2011) The Arabidopsis RING E3 ubiquitin ligase AtAIRP2 plays combinatory roles with AtAIRP1 in abscisic acid-mediated drought stress responses. Plant Physiol 157:2240–2257. 10.1104/pp.111.185595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16:735–743. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Derek Bewley J, Bradford KJ, Hilhorst HWM, Nonogaki H (2013) Dormancy and the control of germination. In: Derek Bewley J, Bradford KJ, Hilhorst HWM, Nonogaki H (eds) Seeds: physiology of development, germination and dormancy, 3rd edn. Springer New York, New York, NY, pp 247–297. 10.1007/978-1-4614-4693-4_6 [Google Scholar]
  7. Eisner N, Maymon T, Chancho Sanchez E, Bar-Zvi D, Brodsky S, Finkelstein R, Bar-Zvi D (2021) Phosphorylation of serine 114 of the transcription factor ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 4 is essential for activity. Plant Sci 305:110847. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2021.110847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Footitt S, Douterelo-Soler I, Clay H, Finch-Savage WE (2011) Dormancy cycling in Arabidopsis seeds is controlled by seasonally distinct hormone-signaling pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:20236–20241. 10.1073/pnas.1116325108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gianinetti A (2023) A travel through landscapes of seed dormancy. Plants 12:3963. 10.3390/plants12233963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hwang JH, Seo DH, Kang BG, Kwak JM, Kim WT (2015) Suppression of Arabidopsis AtPUB30 resulted in increased tolerance to salt stress during germination. Plant Cell Rep 34:277–289. 10.1007/s00299-014-1706-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jefferson RA (1987) Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol Biol Rep 5:387–405. 10.1007/BF02667740 [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones AM (2016) A new look at stress: abscisic acid patterns and dynamics at high-resolution. New Phytol 210:38–44. 10.1111/nph.13552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Karssen CM, Brinkhorst-van der Swan DL, Breekland AE, Koornneef M (1983) Induction of dormancy during seed development by endogenous abscisic acid: studies on abscisic acid deficient genotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Planta 157:158–165. 10.1007/bf00393650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim JH, Kim WT (2013) The Arabidopsis RING E3 ubiquitin ligase AtAIRP3/LOG2 participates in positive regulation of high-salt and drought stress responses. Plant Physiol 162:1733–1749. 10.1104/pp.113.220103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim EJ, Lee SH, Park CH, Kim SH, Hsu CC, Xu S, Wang ZY, Kim SK, Kim TW (2019) Plant U-Box40 mediates degradation of the brassinosteroid responsive transcription factor BZR1 in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell 31:791–808. 10.1105/tpc.18.00941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim MS, Ko SR, Jung YJ, Kang KK, Lee YJ, Cho YG (2023) Knockout mutants of OsPUB7 generated using CRISPR/Cas9 revealed abiotic stress tolerance in rice. Int J Mol Sci 24:5338. 10.3390/ijms24065338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Koops P, Pelser S, Ignatz M, Klose C, Marrocco-Selden K, Kretsch T (2011) EDL3 is an F-box protein involved in the regulation of abscisic acid signalling in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot 62:5547–5560. 10.1093/jxb/err236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kosugi S, Hasebe M, Tomita M, Yanagawa H (2009) Systematic identification of cell cycle-dependent yeast nucleocytoplasmic shuttling proteins by prediction of composite motifs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:10171–10176. 10.1073/pnas.0900604106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Li Y, Liu ZB, Wang JM, Li XF, Yang Y (2016) The Arabidopsis kelch repeat F-box E3 ligase ARKP1 plays a positive role for the regulation of abscisic acid signaling. Plant Mol Biol Rep 34:582–591. 10.1007/s11105-015-0942-2 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ma YL, Cao J, He JH, Chen QQ, Li XF, Yang Y (2018) Molecular mechanism for the regulation of ABA homeostasis during plant development and stress responses. Int J Mol Sci 19:3643. 10.3390/ijms19113643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Maymon T, Eisner N, Bar-Zvi D (2022) The ABCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE (ABI) 4 transcription factor Is stabilized by stress. ABA and Phosphorylation Plants 11:2179. 10.3390/plants11162179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. O’Malley RC, Barragan CC, Ecker JR (2015) A user’s guide to the Arabidopsis T-DNA insertion mutant collections. Methods Mol Biol 1284:323–342. 10.1007/978-1-4939-2444-8_16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pardo-Hernández M, Arbona V, Simón I, Rivero RM (2024) Specific ABA-independent tomato transcriptome reprogramming under abiotic stress combination. Plant J 117:1746–1763. 10.1111/tpj.16642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Preston J, Tatematsu K, Kanno Y, Hobo T, Kimura M, Jikumaru Y, Yano R, Kamiya Y, Nambara E (2009) Temporal expression patterns of hormone metabolism genes during imbibition of Arabidopsis thaliana seeds: a comparative study on dormant and non-dormant accessions. Plant Cell Physiol 50:1786–1800. 10.1093/pcp/pcp121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Qin Q, Wang Y, Huang L, Du F, Zhao X, Li Z, Wang W, Fu B (2020) A U-box E3 ubiquitin ligase OsPUB67 is positively involved in drought tolerance in rice. Plant Mol Biol 102:89–107. 10.1007/s11103-019-00933-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Qu L, Sun M, Li X, He R, Zhong M, Luo D, Liu X, Zhao X (2020) The Arabidopsis F-box protein FOF2 regulates ABA-mediated seed germination and drought tolerance. Plant Sci 301:110643. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110643 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rock CD (2000) Tansley review no. 120. New Phytol 148:357–396. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00769.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ryu MY, Cho SK, Kim WT (2010) The Arabidopsis C3H2C3-type RING E3 ubiquitin ligase AtAIRP1 is a positive regulator of an abscisic acid-dependent response to drought stress. Plant Physiol 154:1983–1997. 10.1104/pp.110.164749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Samuel MA, Mudgil Y, Salt JN, Delmas F, Ramachandran S, Chilelli A, Goring DR (2008) Interactions between the S-domain receptor kinases and AtPUB-ARM E3 ubiquitin ligases suggest a conserved signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 147:2084–2095. 10.1104/pp.108.123380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Seo DH, Ryu MY, Jammes F, Hwang JH, Turek M, Kang BG, Kwak JM, Kim WT (2012) Roles of four Arabidopsis U-Box E3 ubiquitin ligases in negative regulation of abscisic acid-mediated drought stress responses. Plant Physiol 160:556–568. 10.1104/pp.112.202143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Seo DH, Lee A, Yu SG, Cui LH, Min HJ, Lee SE, Cho NH, Kim S, Bae H, Kim WT (2021) OsPUB41, a U-box E3 ubiquitin ligase, acts as a negative regulator of drought stress response in rice (Oryza Sativa L.). Plant Mol Biol 106:463–477. 10.1007/s11103-021-01158-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tang XL, Mu XM, Shao HB, Wang HY, Brestic M (2015) Global plant-responding mechanisms to salt stress: physiological and molecular levels and implications in biotechnology. Crit Rev Biotechnol 35:425–437. 10.3109/07388551.2014.889080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Trenner J, Monaghan J, Saeed B, Quint M, Shabek N, Trujillo M (2022) Evolution and functions of plant U-box proteins: from protein quality control to signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol 20:93–121. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-102720-012310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Trujillo M (2018) News from the PUB: plant U-box type E3 ubiquitin ligases. J Exp Bot 69:371–384. 10.1093/jxb/erx411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Trujillo M (2021) Ubiquitin signalling: controlling the message of surface immune receptors. New Phytol 231:47–53. 10.1111/nph.17360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vierstra RD (2009) The ubiquitin-26S proteasome system at the nexus of plant biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:385–397. 10.1038/nrm2688 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang X, Ding YL, Li ZY, Shi YT, Wang JL, Hua J, Gong ZZ, Zhou JM, Yang SH (2019) PUB25 and PUB26 promote plant freezing tolerance by degrading the cold signaling negative regulator MYB15. Devel Cell 51:222–235. 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wiborg J, O’shea C, Skriver K (2008) Biochemical function of typical and variant Arabidopsis thaliana U-box E3 ubiquitin-protein ligases. Biochem J 413:447–457. 10.1042/BJ20071568 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Yu F, Wu Y, Xie Q (2016) Ubiquitin–proteasome system in ABA signaling: from perception to action. Mol Plant 9:21–33. 10.1016/j.molp.2015.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang YY, Yang CW, Li Y, Zheng NY, Chen H, Zhao QZ, Gao T, Guo HS, Xie Q (2007) SDIR1 is a RING finger E3 ligase that positively regulates stress-responsive abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19:1912–1929. 10.1105/tpc.106.048488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES