Skip to main content
Reproductive Medicine and Biology logoLink to Reproductive Medicine and Biology
. 2024 Dec 15;23(1):e12620. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12620

Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: A summary report for 2022 by the Ethics Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Yukiko Katagiri 1, Seung Chik Jwa 2,, Akira Kuwahara 3, Takeshi Iwasa 3, Masanori Ono 4, Keiichi Kato 5, Hiroshi Kishi 6, Yoshimitsu Kuwabara 7, Fuminori Taniguchi 8, Miyuki Harada 9, Akira Iwase 10, Norihiro Sugino 11
PMCID: PMC11646354  PMID: 39677328

Abstract

Purpose

This descriptive analysis evaluated the 2022 assisted reproductive technology (ART) data collected by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology registry.

Methods and Results

In 2022 (cutoff date 30 November 2023), 634 of 635 registered ART facilities participated; 602 implemented ART treatment, with 543 630 registered cycles and 77 206 neonates (9.1% and 10.6% increases from the previous year). For fresh cycles, freeze‐all in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles increased, resulting in 2183 and 2822 neonates, respectively. In total, 275 296 cycles resulted in oocyte retrieval, with 158 247 (57.5%) freeze‐all cycles. Total single embryo transfer (ET) and singleton pregnancy rates were 82.4% and 97.2%, respectively. The singleton live birth rate was 97.4%. The number of frozen–thawed ET (FET) cycles was 264 412, with 98 348 pregnancies and 72 201 neonates. The single ET rate was 85.3%. The rate of singleton pregnancies was 96.9%; that of singleton live births was 96.9%. Per registered cycle, women had a mean age of 37.6 (standard deviation: 4.8) years; 210 322 cycles (38.7%) were conducted for women aged ≥40 years.

Conclusions

Significant growth in ART cycles and outcomes reflects the impact of recent expanded insurance coverage.

Keywords: assisted reproductive technologies, fertility rate, in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injections, Japan


In 2022, 634 of 635 registered ART facilities participated; 602 implemented ART treatment, with 543 630 registered cycles and 77 206 neonates (9.1% and 10.6% increases from the previous year). Significant growth in ART cycles and outcomes reflects the impact of recent expanded insurance coverage.

graphic file with name RMB2-23-e12620-g002.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Fertility rates in Japan have been trending downward over the past four decades, 1 with rapidly declining birth rates and accelerated aging. By 2020, the total fertility rate in Japan had decreased to 1.33 births per woman, 2 lower than the previous record of 1.36 in 2019 and significantly down from the 1.44 rate in 2016. 2 More recent data indicate that the total fertility rate in Japan has continued to decrease yearly to historically low rates of 1.26 and 1.20 births per woman in 2022 and 2023. 3 The World Bank reported a global fertility rate of 2.4 in 2019, 2.3 in 2020, and 2.3 in 2022, depicting a similar global trend in declining fertility rates. 4 The underlying causes of this phenomenon are complex, with a range of factors thought to have impacted fertility and birth rates in Japan. These may include tendencies to marry late or not at all, 5 , 6 increasing trends in later childbearing that accompany women's empowerment in education and the workforce, 7 increased burdens of parenting and rising costs of raising children, difficulties women experience in continuing to work, 8 increases in the rate of irregular employment, 9 , 10 and growth of a super‐aged population. 11 , 12

The Japanese government has made extensive efforts to reverse these fertility trends, among which perhaps the most impactful measures might be the doubling of government spending on child‐related programs and coverage of assisted reproductive technology (ART) and male infertility treatments by public insurance since April 2022. 13 , 14 Given the increasing trend toward later childbearing, Japan's ART field has seen significant advancements and changes over the years, reflecting evolving societal attitudes and advancements in medical technology. 14 , 15 Indeed, Japan is a leading country in the use of ART. 16 In 2021, 498 140 cycles of ART were performed in Japan, which led to 69 797 live births, representing increases of 10.7% and 15.5%, respectively, from the numbers reported in 2020. 17

The Ethics Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) has been monitoring and reporting developments in ART since 1986. In 2007, it implemented an online ART registration system. The committee publishes an annual report that provides a comprehensive overview of ART practices, trends, and ethical considerations in Japan. This examination of data from registered ART facilities may be helpful in updating policymakers, health care providers, and the public about the evolving landscape of reproductive medicine. The following report will examine the detailed findings and implications of the 2022 ART data collected by the JSOG and compare the present results with those from previous years.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Data source and data collection

The JSOG registry collects data from registered ART facilities across Japan. It collects demographic and background characteristics of patients, clinical information such as infertility diagnosis, treatment information, and pregnancy and obstetric outcomes following treatment as ART‐cycle‐specific data. 18 The present descriptive analysis investigated registered cycle characteristics and treatment outcomes using data from the Japanese ART registry in 2022 with a cutoff date of 30 November 2023.

2.2. Variables of interest

Data for the following variables by fertilization method (in vitro fertilization [IVF], intracytoplasmic sperm injection [ICSI], and frozen–thawed embryo transfer [FET]) were collected, analyzed, and compared with data from previous years: number of registered cycles, oocyte retrievals, embryo transfer (ET) cycles, freeze‐all‐embryo/oocyte cycles, and numbers of pregnancies and neonates. Characteristics of registered cycles and pregnancy outcomes were described for fresh and FET cycles. Fresh cycle data were stratified by fertilization method (i.e., IVF and ICSI).

2.3. Outcomes

The list and definitions of the treatment outcomes analyzed and compared were as follows: pregnancy (confirmation of a gestational sac in utero), miscarriage (spontaneous or unplanned loss of a fetus from the uterus before 22 weeks of gestation), live birth (delivery of at least one live neonate after 22 weeks of gestation), and multiple pregnancy rates.

The pregnancy outcomes analyzed and compared were ectopic pregnancy, heterotopic pregnancy, artificially induced abortion, stillbirth, and fetal reduction. The following outcomes were also analyzed by patient age: pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage, and multiple pregnancy rates. Treatment outcomes for FET cycles using frozen–thawed oocytes were also analyzed.

2.4. Statistical analysis

All analyses were conducted using the STATA MP statistical package, version 18.5 (Stata, College Station). Statistical testing was not conducted as this study focuses on descriptive analysis.

3. RESULTS

In 2022, of the 635 registered ART facilities, 634 participated in the JSOG registry and, of these, 602 actually implemented ART treatment.

Table 1 summarizes the main trends in the numbers of registered cycles, egg retrievals, pregnancy, and neonate births categorized by IVF, ICSI, and FET cycles in Japan (2007–2022). In 2022, 543 630 cycles were registered for IVF, ICSI, and FET, and a total of 77 206 neonates were recorded in Japan, representing 9.1% and 10.6% increases from the previous year. Of note, the number of IVF cycles registered increased by 3.4%, and ICSI cycles increased by 10.3% from the numbers reported in 2021.

TABLE 1.

Trends in numbers of registered cycles, oocyte retrieval, pregnancy, and neonates based on IVF, ICSI, and frozen–thawed embryo transfer cycles in Japan, 2007–2022.

Year IVF a ICSI b FET cycle c
No. of registered cycles No. of egg retrievals No. of freeze‐all cycles No. of ET cycles No. of cycles with pregnancy No. of neonates No. of registered cycles No. of egg retrievals No. of freeze‐all cycles No. of ET cycles No. of cycles with pregnancy No. of neonates No. of registered cycles No. of ET cycles No. of cycles with pregnancy No. of neonates
2007 53 873 52 165 7626 28 228 7416 5144 61 813 60 294 11 541 34 032 7784 5194 45 478 43 589 13 965 9257
2008 59 148 57 217 10 139 29 124 6897 4664 71 350 69 864 15 390 34 425 7017 4615 60 115 57 846 18 597 12 425
2009 63 083 60 754 11 800 28 559 6891 5046 76 790 75 340 19 046 35 167 7330 5180 73 927 71 367 23 216 16 454
2010 67 714 64 966 13 843 27 905 6556 4657 90 677 88 822 24 379 37 172 7699 5277 83 770 81 300 27 382 19 011
2011 71 422 68 651 16 202 27 284 6341 4546 102 473 100 518 30 773 38 098 7601 5415 95 764 92 782 31 721 22 465
2012 82 108 79 434 20 627 29 693 6703 4740 125 229 122 962 41 943 40 829 7947 5498 119 089 116 176 39 106 27 715
2013 89 950 87 104 25 085 30 164 6817 4776 134 871 134 871 49 316 41 150 8027 5630 141 335 138 249 45 392 32 148
2014 92 269 89 397 27 624 30 414 6970 5025 144 247 141 888 55 851 41 437 8122 5702 157 229 153 977 51 458 36 595
2015 93 614 91 079 30 498 28 858 6478 4629 155 797 153 639 63 660 41 396 8169 5761 174 740 171 495 56 888 40 611
2016 94 566 92 185 34 188 26 182 5903 4266 161 262 159 214 70 387 38 315 7324 5166 191 962 188 338 62 749 44 678
2017 91 516 89 447 36 441 22 423 5182 3731 157 709 155 758 74 200 33 297 6757 4826 198 985 195 559 67 255 48 060
2018 92 552 90 376 38 882 20 894 4755 3402 158 859 157 026 79 496 29 569 5886 4194 203 482 200 050 69 395 49 383
2019 88 074 86 334 40 561 17 345 4002 2974 154 824 153 014 83 129 24 490 4789 3433 215 203 211 758 74 911 54 188
2020 82 883 81 286 42 530 13 362 3094 2282 151 732 150 082 87 697 19 061 3626 2596 215 285 211 914 76 196 55 503
2021 88 362 86 901 42 016 13 219 3115 2268 170 350 168 659 86 992 19 740 3875 2850 239 428 236 211 87 174 64 679
2022 91 402 89 807 49 433 12 211 3007 2183 187 816 185 489 108 814 19 299 3878 2822 264 412 260 101 98 348 72 201

Abbreviations: ET, embryo transfer; FET, frozen–thawed embryo transfer; GIFT, gamete intrafallopian transfer; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF, in vitro fertilization.

a

Including GIFT and other.

b

Including split‐ICSI cycles.

c

Including cycles using frozen–thawed oocyte.

In contrast with 2021, freeze‐all IVF and ICSI increased by 17.7% and 25.1%, respectively. The number of neonates born by IVF‐ET cycles was 2183 and 2822 by ICSI, representing slight decreases (3.7% and 1.0%) from the previous year. The continuously increasing trend seen for FET cycles since 2007 was maintained in 2022, with a 10.4% increase. The number of FET cycles was 264 412, with 98 348 pregnancies and 72 201 neonates.

Figure 1 shows the age distributions for all registered cycles and different subgroups of cycles for ET, pregnancy, and live births in 2022. The mean patient age for registered cycles was 37.6 years (standard deviation [SD] ± 4.8); the mean age for pregnancy and live birth cycles was 35.7 years (SD ± 4.3) and 35.2 years (SD ± 4.2), respectively. In 2022, 38.7% of ART cycles (210 322 cycles) registered were undertaken for women aged 40 years or over. Of note, there was a peak in registered cycles (46095) among patients aged 42 years.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Distribution of maternal age from all registered cycles, cycles for ET, cycles leading to pregnancy, and cycles leading to live births in 2022. Adapted from the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology ART Databook 2022 (https://www.jsog.or.jp/activity/art/2022_JSOG‐ART.pdf). ET, embryo transfer.

3.1. Treatment and pregnancy outcomes

The detailed characteristics and treatment outcomes of registered fresh cycles are shown in Table 2. In 2022, 85 124 IVF cycles, 34 581 split‐ICSI cycles, 150 958 ICSI cycles using ejaculated spermatozoa, 2277 ICSI cycles using testicular sperm extraction (TESE), 2628 cycles for oocyte freezing, and 3650 other cycles were registered. In total, 275 296 cycles resulted in oocyte retrieval, of which 158 247 (57.5%) were freeze‐all cycles. The pregnancy rate was 24.6% per ET cycle of IVF, and 19.2% for ICSI using ejaculated spermatozoa. The total single ET rate was 82.4%, and the pregnancy rate following a single ET cycle was 22.6%. Live birth rates per ET were 17.4% for IVF, 19.0% for split‐ICSI, 13.5% for ICSI using ejaculated spermatozoa, and 8.6% for ICSI with TESE. There were 6556 singleton pregnancies and 4758 singleton live births. In 2022, 2628 cycles for oocyte freezing were registered, and 2608 oocyte retrievals were conducted. Of these, 2402 cycles led to successfully frozen oocytes. The singleton pregnancy rate was 97.2%, and the singleton live birth rate was 97.4%.

TABLE 2.

Characteristics and treatment outcomes of registered fresh cycles in assisted reproductive technology in Japan, 2022.

Variables IVF Split‐ICSI ICSI Frozen oocyte Other a Total
Ejaculated sperm TESE
No. of registered cycles 85 124 34 581 150 958 2277 2628 3650 279 218
No. of egg retrievals (0 or more) 83 586 34 293 148 923 2273 2608 3613 275 296
No. of fresh ET cycles (1 or more) 11 951 2907 16 088 304 0 260 31 510
No. of freeze‐all cycles 45 068 27 010 80 436 1368 2402 1963 158 247
No. of cycles with pregnancy 2942 752 3084 42 0 65 6885
Pregnancy rate per ET 24.6% 25.9% 19.2% 13.8% 25.0% 21.9%
Pregnancy rate per egg retrieval 3.5% 2.2% 2.1% 1.9% 1.8% 2.5%
Pregnancy rate per egg retrieval excluding freeze‐all cycles 4.5% 3.6% 2.7% 2.6% 2.0% 3.3%
SET cycles 10 321 2529 12 721 186 220 25 977
Pregnancy following SET cycles 2586 686 2515 32 61 5880
Rate of SET cycles 86.4% 87.0% 79.1% 61.2% 84.6% 82.4%
Pregnancy rate following SET cycles 25.1% 27.1% 19.8% 17.2% 27.7% 22.6%
Miscarriages 709 158 785 14 12 1678
Miscarriage rate per pregnancy 24.1% 21.0% 25.5% 33.3% 18.5% 24.4%
Singleton pregnancies b 2801 720 2931 41 63 6556
Multiple pregnancies b 74 20 90 0 2 186
Twin pregnancies 73 20 88 0 0 183
Triplet pregnancies 1 0 2 0 0 3
Quadruplet pregnancies 0 0 0 0 0 0
Multiple pregnancy rate 2.6% 2.7% 3.0% 0.0% 3.1% 2.8%
Live births 2082 553 2172 26 50 4883
Live birth rate per ET 17.4% 19.0% 13.5% 8.6% 19.2% 15.5%
Total no. of neonates 2133 568 2228 26 50 5005
Singleton live births 2031 538 2113 26 50 4758
Twin live births 51 15 56 0 0 122
Triplet live births 0 0 1 0 0 1
Quadruplet live births 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ectopic pregnancies 39 4 39 1 1 84
Heterotopic pregnancies 1 0 0 0 0 1
Artificial abortions 11 4 19 1 1 36
Still births 12 1 9 0 0 22
Fetal reductions 0 0 1 0 0 1
Cycles with unknown pregnancy outcomes 57 27 47 0 1 132

Abbreviations: ET, embryo transfer; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF, in vitro fertilization; SET, single embryo transfer; TESE, testicular sperm extraction; ZIFT, zygote intrafallopian transfer.

a

Others include ZIFT.

b

Singleton, twin, triplet, and quadruplet pregnancies were defined on the basis of the number of gestational sacs in utero.

Table 3 summarizes the characteristics and treatment outcomes of FET cycles. In 2022, a total of 264 015 cycles were registered. Of these, 262 146 were registered as FET cycles. Of the latter, 258 217 FETs were conducted. With a pregnancy rate of 37.8%, FET cycles resulted in 97 664 pregnancies. FET cycles resulted in 24 969 miscarriages. The miscarriage rate per pregnancy was 25.6%, and the live birth rate per FET increased slightly to 27.0% from 26.6% observed in 2021. The single ET rate was 85.3%, somewhat higher than in 2021 (84.9%), resulting in a slightly increased pregnancy rate of 38.8% from 38.1% in 2021. The rate of singleton pregnancies was 96.9%, and singleton live births was 96.9%.

TABLE 3.

Characteristics and treatment outcomes of frozen cycles in assisted reproductive technology in Japan, 2022.

Variables FET Other a Total
No. of registered cycles 262 146 1869 264 015
No. of FET 258 217 1688 259 905
No. of cycles of pregnancy 97 664 643 98 307
Pregnancy rate per FET 37.8% 38.1% 37.8%
SET cycles 220 292 1386 221 678
Pregnancy following SET cycles 85 432 538 85 970
Rate of SET cycles 85.3% 82.1% 85.3%
Pregnancy rate following SET cycles 38.8% 38.8% 38.8%
Miscarriages 24 969 181 25 150
Miscarriage rate per pregnancy 25.6% 28.2% 25.6%
Singleton pregnancies b 93 406 617 94 023
Multiple pregnancies b 3000 16 3016
Twin pregnancies 2939 16 2955
Triplet pregnancies 54 0 54
Quadruplet pregnancies 6 0 6
Quintuplet pregnancies 1 0 1
Multiple pregnancy rate 3.1% 2.5% 3.1%
Live births 69 834 435 70 269
Live birth rate per FET 27.0% 25.8% 27.0%
Total no. of neonates 71 733 446 72 179
Singleton live births 67 646 424 68 070
Twin live births 2018 11 2029
Triplet live births 17 0 17
Quadruplet live births 0 0 0
Ectopic pregnancies 476 1 477
Heterotopic pregnancies 23 0 23
Artificial abortions 436 4 440
Stillbirths 239 5 244
Fetal reductions 18 0 18
Cycles with unknown pregnancy outcomes 1430 8 1438

Abbreviations: FET, frozen–thawed embryo transfer; SET, single embryo transfer.

a

Including cycles using frozen–thawed oocytes.

b

Singleton, twin, triplet, and quadruplet pregnancies were defined on the basis of the number of gestational sacs in utero.

3.2. Outcomes by patient age

Table 4 shows the treatment outcomes of registered cycles by patient age in Japan in 2022. The pregnancy rate per ET exceeded 40% for women aged between 21 and 37 years. Gradual decreases in pregnancy rates per ET were observed with increasing maternal age, starting at age 26 years. Rates fell below 30% for women aged >41 years, below 20% among women aged >43 years, below 10% for women aged >45 years, and below 5% for women aged >48 years. The miscarriage rates tended to be below 20% for all women aged between 22 and 34 years and increased gradually with increasing maternal age. Women in their early forties had miscarriage rates generally between 33% and 52%, while women in their mid‐forties had miscarriage rates over 57%. The live birth rate per registered cycle was the highest for women aged 29 years (23.2%). Rates declined sharply to below 15.0% at 39 years of age and below 10.0% among women >41 years of age.

TABLE 4.

Treatment outcomes of registered cycles based on patient age in Japan, 2022.

Age (years) No. of registered cycles No. of ET cycles No. of cycles with pregnancy Multiple pregnancies Miscarriage Cycles with live birth Pregnancy rate/registered ET (%) Pregnancy rate/registered cycles (%) Live birth rate/registered cycles Miscarriage rate (%) Multiple pregnancy rate (%) a
≤20 80 8 4 0 1 3 50.0 5.0 3.8 25.0 0.0
21 73 32 13 2 2 9 40.6 17.8 12.3 15.4 8.3
22 106 46 25 1 7 18 54.4 23.6 17.0 28.0 4.0
23 321 155 72 3 10 60 46.5 22.4 18.7 13.9 4.2
24 704 379 182 6 37 141 48.0 25.9 20.0 20.3 1.7
25 1375 730 386 24 50 317 52.9 28.1 23.1 13.0 3.5
26 2777 1507 752 20 122 603 49.9 27.1 21.7 16.2 2.0
27 5290 2961 1477 72 236 1193 49.9 27.9 22.6 16.0 3.4
28 8452 4764 2306 92 365 1869 48.4 27.3 22.1 15.8 2.7
29 12 217 7054 3489 148 559 2831 49.5 28.6 23.2 16.0 3.1
30 16 342 9563 4639 196 830 3692 48.5 28.4 22.6 17.9 3.3
31 19 571 11 596 5574 215 1000 4415 48.1 28.5 22.6 17.9 2.7
32 22 481 13 366 6323 236 1201 4939 47.3 28.1 22.0 19.0 2.5
33 26 083 15 732 7312 312 1391 5704 46.5 28.0 21.9 19.0 3.0
34 30 060 18 109 8132 319 1628 6268 44.9 27.1 20.9 20.0 2.9
35 33 153 19 818 8702 394 1867 6558 43.9 26.3 19.8 21.5 3.0
36 34 198 20 337 8486 392 1940 6271 41.7 24.8 18.3 22.9 3.3
37 36 825 21 664 8734 389 2138 6335 40.3 23.7 17.2 24.5 3.2
38 39 450 22 535 8522 416 2290 5960 37.8 21.6 15.1 26.9 3.6
39 43 750 24 167 8320 377 2517 5550 34.4 19.0 12.7 30.3 3.4
40 42 903 22 990 7199 337 2344 4616 31.3 16.8 10.8 32.6 3.3
41 40 639 19 954 5460 231 2047 3249 27.4 13.4 8.0 37.5 3.3
42 46 095 20 960 4651 219 2007 2484 22.2 10.1 5.4 43.2 3.2
43 29 849 13 859 2524 98 1194 1246 18.2 8.5 4.2 47.3 2.6
44 19 824 8085 1116 45 577 508 13.8 5.6 2.6 51.7 2.5
45 13 425 5131 490 13 280 197 9.6 3.6 1.5 57.1 1.7
46 8019 2908 190 7 113 77 6.5 2.4 1.0 59.5 1.6
47 4542 1506 85 3 55 29 5.6 1.9 0.6 64.7 0.0
48 2561 851 39 1 22 16 4.6 1.5 0.6 56.4 0.0
49 1302 432 17 2 8 8 3.9 1.3 0.6 47.1 11.8
≥50 1163 412 12 1 6 6 2.9 1.0 0.5 50.0 0.0
Total 543 630 291 611 105 233 4571 26 844 75 172 36.1 19.4 13.8 25.5 3.1

Abbreviation: ET, embryo transfer.

a

Multiple pregnancies were defined on the basis of the number of gestational sacs in utero.

Figure 2 shows the rates of pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage by patient age in all registered cycles in 2022. Of note, the pregnancy rate per ET was around 50% at ages 26 and 27 and generally above 45% between ages 28 and 34 years. There was then a progressive decline from that point, which became even more marked beyond the age of 40 years, similar to that reported in the previous year. Similar trends were observed for pregnancy and live birth rates (below 30% and 25%, respectively), with progressive declines starting as early as 35 years of age. Conversely, miscarriage rates gradually increased from the early thirties up to 38 years of age and increased rapidly thereafter until the late forties.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates according to patient age in all registered cycles 2022. Adapted from the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology ART Databook 2022 (https://www.jsog.or.jp/activity/art/2022_JSOG‐ART.pdf). ET, embryo transfer.

3.3. Treatment outcomes for FET cycles using frozen–thawed oocytes

Table 5 shows the primary treatment outcomes of embryo transfers using frozen–thawed oocytes in Japan in 2022. In 2022, 397 cycles using frozen–thawed oocytes were registered in Japan, of which 196 FETs were actually implemented. Forty‐one pregnancies were achieved, with a pregnancy rate per FET of 20.9% and a live birth rate of 10.2%. The miscarriage rate per pregnancy was 39.0%.

TABLE 5.

Treatment outcomes of embryo transfers using frozen–thawed oocyte in assisted reproductive technology in Japan, 2022.

Variables Embryo transfers using frozen–thawed oocytes
No. of registered cycles 397
No. of ET 196
No. of cycles with pregnancy 41
Pregnancy rate per ET 20.9%
SET cycles 120
Pregnancy following SET cycles 29
Rate of SET cycles 61.2%
Pregnancy rate following SET cycles 24.2%
Miscarriages 16
Miscarriage rate per pregnancy 39.0%
Singleton pregnancies a 36
Multiple pregnancies a 1
Twin pregnancies 1
Triplet pregnancies 0
Quadruplet pregnancies 0
Multiple pregnancy rate 2.7%
Live births 20
Live birth rate per ET 10.2%
Total number of neonates 22
Singleton live births 18
Twin live births 2
Triplet live births 0
Quadruplet live births 0
Ectopic pregnancies 0
Intrauterine pregnancies coexisting with ectopic pregnancy 0
Artificial abortions 1
Still births 1
Fetal reductions 0
Cycles with unknown pregnancy outcomes 2

Abbreviations: ET, embryo transfer; SET, single embryo transfer.

a

Singleton, twin, triplet, and quadruplet pregnancies were defined on the basis of the number of gestational sacs in utero.

4. DISCUSSION

We described the characteristics and outcomes of ART cycles registered in the Japanese ART registry system during 2022 and compared the present results with those from 2021 17 and previous years. 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 The main findings of the Japanese ART registry in 2022 were as follows: in 2022, 543 630 cycles were registered; 105 233 pregnancies and a total of 77 206 neonate births were recorded by the JSOG in Japan.

In 2022, there were significant increases in ART cycles. IVF cycles increased by 3.4%, and ICSI cycles increased by 10.3%. Freeze‐all cycles accounted for 57.5% of cycles with oocyte retrieval, resulting in a 3.7% decrease in neonates born from IVF‐ET cycles and a 1.0% decrease in those born from ICSI cycles. FET cycles also increased by 10.4%. A total of 210 322 cycles (38.7%) were for cycles in women aged 40 years or over. The total single ET and singleton pregnancy rates for fresh cycles were 82.4% and 97.2%, respectively, and the singleton live birth rate was 97.4%. For frozen cycles, the single ET rate was 85.3%. The rates of singleton pregnancies and singleton live births were both 96.9%.

This report also reflects the impact of the first year since the expansion of insurance coverage for ART (April 2022). This expansion is perhaps the most impactful influence on the increase in the number of ART treatments in Japan, with an increased number of cycles and live births in 2022 (543 630 and 77 206, respectively) compared with 2021 (498 140 and 69 797, respectively). 17 This coverage marks a significant improvement in access to fertility treatments in Japan. It not only alleviates the financial burden on patients but also represents a crucial step toward equity in reproductive health care. For low‐income couples who aspire to become parents, the cost of ART can be prohibitively high, often leading to emotional distress and limiting their options. With insurance coverage, these couples can pursue treatments without the constant worry of overwhelming expenses, thereby fostering a more supportive environment for family planning. In addition, young couples, who may be navigating the challenges of establishing their careers and finances, also stand to benefit significantly. By reducing the out‐of‐pocket costs associated with ART, insurance coverage enables them to make informed decisions about starting a family without the immediate pressure of financial constraints.

Additionally, the implementation of the “High‐cost Medical Expense Benefit” is a noteworthy aspect of this initiative. If the copayment, calculated on the basis of certain standards, exceeds the maximum, the excess amount will be paid as High‐cost Medical Care Benefits. This program provides further financial support to individuals who face very high medical expenses, ensuring that those requiring extensive ART services are not unduly burdened. 23 By minimizing the financial risks associated with fertility treatments, this benefit can enhance treatment adherence and, ultimately, improve reproductive outcomes.

Some patients may face greater financial strain, even under the new insurance coverage system. Several local governments have started offering subsidies for advanced ART treatments not covered by public insurance. Such treatments are combined with ART procedures and are usually paid for entirely by the patient. The effect of those additional subsidies—especially for boosting the fertility rate—are, as yet, unknown. Despite being the most accessible region for ART treatments, Tokyo has the lowest fertility rate. 24 This suggests that simply reducing the financial burden of ART may not be enough to improve fertility trends.

The current system is well organized, but concerns have been raised about developing new ART treatments. Individual clinics usually innovate and develop new ART treatments, but insurance coverage seems to focus on standardized procedures. This could be, in part, because standardized treatments have established success rates and are easier to regulate and cover under insurance policies. As new treatments emerge, integrating them into the existing system, which currently leans toward standard ART, may pose certain challenges.

Another important factor that may limit families from receiving the ART insurance coverage benefit is that the couple's relationship is also scrutinized. 25 In Japan, there is no specific legislation governing the use of third‐party gametes or embryos for ART. JSOG provides guidelines, but these are not legally binding. 26 , 27 Thus, ongoing discussion is needed regarding the creation of more comprehensive regulations. 28

In 2022, out of 2628 oocyte freezing cycles, 2402 resulted in successfully frozen oocytes, while in 2021, out of 1103 cycles, 830 resulted in the successful freezing of oocytes. This represents success rates of approximately 91.4% in 2022 and approximately 75.2% in 2021, indicating a considerable increase in the success rate of oocyte freezing from 2021 to 2022. 17

Several factors could contribute to this improvement. Fertility preservation in Japan, especially for medical reasons such as cancer, has become more popular. The Japanese government has established subsidy systems to support this. Patients can apply for subsidies from both local and central governments to help cover the costs of fertility preservation and subsequent ART. 29 , 30 Advances in cryopreservation techniques, such as vitrification, have improved oocyte survival rates during freezing and thawing, 31 , 32 with live birth rates varying based on the age at which oocytes were frozen. 31 The higher number of oocyte freezing in 2022 compared with 2021 underscores the positive impact of both technological advancements and diffusion of fertility preservation using ART in Japan.

The pregnancy rate per FET cycle has shown a secular trend, with a slight increase from 36.9% in 2021 to 37.8% in 2022. This trend is an interesting finding and might be influenced by the introduction of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT‐A) in Japan, following a clinical trial conducted by the JSOG. 33 PGT‐A helps select chromosomally normal embryos, potentially improving implantation and pregnancy rates per embryo transfer. 34 Because of this technique, the single ET rate might increase for FET. In the future, it may be beneficial to assess pregnancy rates separately by PGT‐A status in FET cycles.

This study has some strengths and limitations that have been previously reported. 17

The main strength is that registered ART facilities nationwide must provide annual reports, leading to high reporting compliance. Furthermore, the standardization of procedures and definitions for cycle‐specific information across registered ART facilities has reduced reporting bias. A major limitation is that some data for which collection is not standardized, such as background information, may be more likely incomplete or missing. Furthermore, the registration procedure is somewhat cumbersome in that participating ART facilities are assumed to register cycle‐specific information manually one‐by‐one. Therefore, it is possible that burdens relating to data input are very high and that errors might occur. To address this, the JSOG has launched a subcommittee to debate an effective registration system from 2024, and aims to introduce a batch registration system in the near future.

The 2022 ART data analysis from the Japanese ART registry administered by the JSOG highlights significant growth in ART cycles and outcomes, reflecting the impact of the recent expansion of insurance coverage. Despite the increase in ART cycles, success rates and outcomes vary by age, emphasizing the need for continued advancements and monitoring regarding ART treatments. The data underscore the importance of age in ART outcomes, with higher pregnancy and live birth rates among younger age groups. The expansion of insurance coverage and local government subsidies have contributed to a notable increase in ART use in Japan. However, financial strain and regional disparities in fertility rates suggest that further measures are needed to address underlying challenges and improve overall fertility trends. This annual analysis is essential to comprehending the changing trends and patterns in ART, especially given the continuously declining fertility rate, growing elderly population, and decreasing population growth worldwide, particularly in Japan. As Japan continues to lead ART, integrating new treatments into the standardized insurance‐covered procedures will be crucial. Addressing the financial and logistical barriers faced by patients, especially in regions with lower fertility rates, will be essential for sustaining and enhancing the success of ART programs.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose about the present work. “Seung Chik, Jwa”, “Akira, Iwase”, “Takeshi, Iwasa”, are an Editorial Board member of Reproductive Medicine and Biology and a coauthor of this article. To minimize bias, they were excluded from all editorial decision‐making related to the acceptance of this article for publication.

HUMAN RIGHTS STATEMENTS AND INFORMED CONSENT

All procedures were performed according to the ethical standards of the relevant committees on human experimentation (institutional and national), as well as the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its later amendments.

ANIMAL RIGHTS

This report contains no studies performed by any authors that included animals.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors wish to thank all of the registered facilities for their cooperation in providing their responses and encourage these facilities to continue promoting the use of the online registry system and assisting us with our research. The authors also thank Keyra Martinez Dunn, MD of Edanz (www.edanz.com), for providing medical writing support.

Katagiri Y, Jwa SC, Kuwahara A, Iwasa T, Ono M, Kato K, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: A summary report for 2022 by the Ethics Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Reprod Med Biol. 2024;23:e12620. 10.1002/rmb2.12620

REFERENCES

  • 1. National Institute of Population and Social Security Research . 2020. [Cited 2024 Oct 10]. Available from: http://www.ipss.go.jp/syoushika/tohkei/Popular/Popular2020.asp?chap=0
  • 2. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare . Handbook of Health and Welfare Statistics 2023. Table 1‐20 Total fertility rates by year. 2021. [Cited 2024 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/database/db‐hh/1‐2.html
  • 3. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare . Summary of vital statistics. [Cited 2024 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/database/db‐hw/populate/index.html
  • 4. World Bank Group . Fertility rate, total (births per woman). [Cited 2024 Oct 10]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN
  • 5. Ghaznavi C, Sakamoto H, Yamasaki L, Nomura S, Yoneoka D, Shibuya K, et al. Salaries, degrees, and babies: trends in fertility by income and education among Japanese men and women born 1943‐1975‐analysis of national surveys. PLoS One. 2022;17(4):e0266835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Okui T. Marriage and fertility rates of Japanese women according to employment status: an age‐period‐cohort analysis. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2020;67(12):892–903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Frejka T, Jones GW, Sardon JP. East Asian childbearing patterns and policy developments. Popul Dev Rev. 2010;36(3):579–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Imai Y, Endo M, Kuroda K, Tomooka K, Ikemoto Y, Sato S, et al. Risk factors for resignation from work after starting infertility treatment among Japanese women: Japan‐female employment and mental health in assisted reproductive technology (J‐FEMA) study. Occup Environ Med. 2020;78(6):426–432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Atoh M. Thinking about very low fertility rate in Japan, based upon its demographic analysis. J Health Care Soc. 2017;27(1):5–20. (In Japanese). [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Okui T, Nakashima N. Exploring the association between non‐regular employment and adverse birth outcomes: an analysis of national data in Japan. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2024;36:e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Parsons AJQ, Gilmour S. An evaluation of fertility‐ and migration‐based policy responses to Japan's ageing population. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0209285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Baba S, Goto A, Reich MR. Looking for Japan's missing third baby boom. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44(2):199–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan . Support for infertility treatment. [Cited 2024 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/000901931.pdf
  • 14. Harada S, Yamada M, Shirasawa H, Jwa SC, Kuroda K, Harada M, et al. Fact‐finding survey on assisted reproductive technology in Japan. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2023;49(11):2593–2601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Katagiri Y, Jwa SC, Kuwahara A, Iwasa T, Ono M, Kato K, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report for 2020 by the ethics Committee of the Japan Society of obstetrics and gynecology. Reprod Med Biol. 2023;22(1):e12494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kupka MS, Chambers GM, Dyer S, Zegers‐Hochschild F, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology world report: assisted reproductive technology, 2015 and 2016. Fertil Steril. 2024;112(24):875–893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Katagiri Y, Jwa SC, Kuwahara A, Iwasa T, On M, Kato K, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report for 2021 by the ethics Committee of the Japan Society of obstetrics and gynecology. Reprod Med Biol. 2023;23(1):e12552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Irahara M, Kuwahara A, Iwasa T, Ishikawa T, Ishihara O, Kugu K, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report of 1992‐2014 by the ethics committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Reprod Med Biol. 2017;16(2):126–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ishihara O, Jwa SC, Kuwahara A, Katagiri Y, Kuwabara Y, Hamatani T, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report for 2018 by the ethics Committee of the Japan Society of obstetrics and gynecology. Reprod Med Biol. 2020;20(1):3–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ishihara O, Jwa SC, Kuwahara A, Katagiri Y, Kuwabara Y, Hamatani T, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report for 2017 by the ethics Committee of the Japan Society of obstetrics and gynecology. Reprod Med Biol. 2019;19(1):3–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Ishihara O, Jwa SC, Kuwahara A, Ishikawa T, Kugu K, Sawa R, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report for 2016 by the ethics Committee of the Japan Society of obstetrics and gynecology. Reprod. Med Biol. 2018;18(1):7–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Saito H, Jwa SC, Kuwahara A, Saito K, Ishikawa T, Ishihara O, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report for 2015 by the ethics Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Reprod Med Biol. 2017;17(1):20–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Central Medical Council . Revision of medical remuneration. Individual Matters (No. 4). 2022. [Cited 2024 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/12404000/001171707.pdf
  • 24. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan . Overview of the annual report (estimated figures) of the population dynamics statistics monthly report for the year 2023. Table 5. [Cited 2024 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/jinkou/geppo/nengai23/dl/kekka.pdf
  • 25. Taisho Pharmaceutical . Infertility treatment is now covered by insurance! What changed? What are the advantages, disadvantages, and challenges? [Cited 2024 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.taisho‐kenko.com/column/84/
  • 26. Yamamoto N, Hirata T, Izumi G, Nakazawa A, Fukuda S, Neriishi K, et al. A survey of public attitudes towards third‐party reproduction in Japan in 2014. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0198499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Croydon S. Reluctant rulers: policy, politics, and assisted reproduction technology in Japan. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2023;32:289‐299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Semba Y, Chang C, Hong H, Kamisato A, Kokado M, Muto K. Surrogacy: donor conception regulation in Japan. Bioethics. 2010;24(7):348–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Ono M, Takai Y, Harada M, Horie A, Dai Y, Kikuchi E, et al. Out‐of‐pocket fertility preservation expenses: data from a Japanese nationwide multicenter survey. Int J Clin Oncol. 2024;29:1959–1966. 10.1007/s10147-024-02614-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Harada M, Kimura F, Takai Y, Nakajima T, Ushijima K, Kobayashi H, et al. Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines 2017 for fertility preservation in childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer patients: part 1. Int J Clin Oncol. 2022;27:265–280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Hirsch A, Hirsh Raccah B, Rotem R, Hyman JH, Ben‐Ami I, Tsafrir A. Planned oocyte cryopreservation: a systematic review and meta‐regression analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2024;30(5):558–568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Han E, Seifer DB. Oocyte cryopreservation for medical and planned indications: a practical guide and overview. J Clin Med. 2023;12(10):3542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Iwasa T, Kuwahara A, Takeshita T, Taniguchi Y, Mikami M, Irahara M. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and chromosomal structural rearrangement: a summary of a nationwide study by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Reprod Med Biol. 2023;22(1):e12518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Tian Y, Li M, Yang J, Chen H, Lu D. Preimplantation genetic testing in the current era, a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024;309(5):1787–1799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Reproductive Medicine and Biology are provided here courtesy of John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine.

RESOURCES