Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2024 Dec 15;38(1):e5309. doi: 10.1002/nbm.5309

Deuterium Metabolic Imaging Enables the Tracing of Substrate Fluxes Through the Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle in the Liver

Viktoria Ehret 1, Sabine C Dürr 2, Usevalad Ustsinau 3, Joachim Friske 4, Thomas Scherer 1, Clemens Fürnsinn 1, Jana Starčuková 5, Thomas H Helbich 4, Cécile Philippe 3, Martin Krššák 1,
PMCID: PMC11646830  PMID: 39676029

ABSTRACT

Alterations in tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle metabolism are associated with hepatic metabolic disorders. Elevated hepatic acetate concentrations, often attributed to high caloric intake, are recognized as a pivotal factor in the etiology of obesity and metabolic syndrome. Therefore, the assessment of acetate breakdown and TCA cycle activity plays a central role in understanding the impact of diet‐induced alterations on liver metabolism. Magnetic resonance‐based deuterium metabolic imaging (DMI) could help to unravel the underlying mechanisms involved in disease development and progression, however, the application of conventional deuterated glucose does not lead to substantial enrichment in hepatic glutamine and glutamate. This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of DMI for tracking deuterated acetate breakdown via the TCA cycle in lean and diet‐induced fatty liver (FL) rats using 3D DMI after an intraperitoneal infusion of sodium acetate‐d3 at 9.4T. Localized and nonlocalized liver spectra acquired at 10 time points post‐injection over a 130‐min study revealed similar intrahepatic acetate uptake in both animal groups (AUCFL = 717.9 ± 131.1 mM▯min−1, AUClean = 605.1 ± 119.9 mM▯min−1, p = 0.62). Metabolic breakdown could be observed in both groups with an emerging glutamine/glutamate (Glx) peak as a downstream metabolic product (AUCFL = 113.6 ± 23.8 mM▯min−1, AUClean = 136.7 ± 41.7 mM▯min−1, p = 0.68).

This study showed the viability of DMI for tracking substrate flux through the TCA cycle, underscoring its methodological potential for imaging metabolic processes in the body.

Keywords: acetate, deuterium metabolic imaging, fatty liver disease, MASLD, metabolism, TCA cycle


Deuterium metabolic imaging (DMI) combined with an acetate infusion demonstrated the viability of DMI for tracking substrate flux through the TCA cycle. Using DMI, we documented the acetate breakdown by identifying an increasing Glx peak as a resulting metabolic product in healthy and fatty livers.

graphic file with name NBM-38-e5309-g004.jpg


Abbreviations

AUC

area under the curve

CSI

chemical shift imaging

DMI

deuterium metabolic imaging

FL

fatty liver

Glx

glutamine/glutamate

GTT

glucose tolerance test

HCL

hepatic lipid content

HDO

deuterated water

HFD

high‐fat diet

MASLD

metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease

MRS(I)

magnetic resonance spectroscopy (imaging)

PET

positron emission tomography

SD

standard diet

SEM

standard error of the mean

SNR

signal‐to‐noise ratio

TCA

tricarboxylic acid

(F)FA

(free) fatty acids

1. Introduction

Obesity and weight‐related metabolic disorders have become increasingly prevalent in recent years, elevating metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) to the leading cause of chronic liver disease worldwide [1]. Impaired insulin sensitivity in white adipose tissue in the obese state causes unrestrained triglyceride lipolysis, which leads to uncontrolled free fatty acids (FFA) influx into the liver ultimately resulting in MASLD [2]. Numerous other mechanisms including increased lipogenesis, decreased lipid export, impaired mitochondrial function, and beta‐oxidation have been implicated in developing MASLD. In addition, alterations in tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle activity are observed in individuals with MASLD and related conditions [3]. Thus, a better comprehension of nutrient flux and TCA cycle in different metabolic states (i.e. lean vs. obese) is important to understand this complex metabolic liver disease.

Lately, magnetic resonance‐based deuterium metabolic imaging (DMI) has been implemented to evaluate the metabolism of various pathologies, primarily in the brain [4, 5, 6]. Applications in the abdominal region have been introduced in animal models and high‐field human investigations [7, 8] and DMI has recently also been demonstrated for monitoring inflammation‐related metabolic alterations [9]. The proven reliability and robustness of DMI, even at clinical magnetic field strengths [10], suggest its potential translation into clinical practice in the near future.

The availability and metabolism of the shortest‐chain fatty acid acetate are associated with metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and obesity [11]. Understanding the role of acetate and TCA metabolism in MASLD may shed light on the metabolic changes associated with this disease. Since investigating acetate metabolism with conventional techniques such as hyperpolarized 13C MRS or PET comes with specific technologic or methodologic limitations, and thermal equilibrium 13C MRS data of fatty liver are prone to lipid signal contamination, in vivo DMI offers a promising complement or alternative to gain deeper insights into these processes.

Despite acetate's central role in various metabolic pathways, including the TCA cycle (see Figure 1), its assessment via DMI remains limited. While De Feyter et al. [13] demonstrated the feasibility of acetate DMI in the brain, a subsequent study applied it to evaluate myocardial energy metabolism [12]. However, the application of acetate DMI in imaging hepatic metabolism has yet to be investigated.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Metabolic breakdown of [2H3]acetate: After reaching the hepatocyte, the acetate transforms into acetyl‐CoA, occurring either in the cytosol where it serves in fatty acid synthesis or within the mitochondrion. There, the acetyl‐CoA subsequently enters the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. The first deuteron gets lost during the conversion to citrate, resulting in only two labels in the detectable downstream Glx. In the TCA cycle steps from succinate to fumarate and from malate to oxaloacetate, the remaining deuterons are potentially transferred to water, contributing to an HDO increase throughout the experiment [12].

Studying the TCA cycle, we mainly anticipate the emergence of glutamine/glutamate (Glx) as a metabolic downstream product. Glx signals have been detected in 2H and uniformly labeled glucose DMI experiments in the brain [13, 14]. However, in the liver under postprandial conditions, glucose is primarily incorporated into glycogen, limiting label detection in Glx [15, 16]. Thus, acetate is a more suitable marker for investigating TCA cycle‐related metabolic processes and detecting downstream Glx.

Leveraging the capability of DMI to trace the fate of deuterated substrates during metabolic breakdown, our study aimed to assess potential alterations in hepatic TCA cycle metabolism in rodents with MASLD using acetate as a metabolic tracer.

2. Experimental

All animal procedures adhered to the European Commission's Directive 2010/63/EU and FELASA guidelines for animal research, receiving approval from the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research, and Economy (license number: BMBWF 2020‐0.078.441).

The animal preparation and DMI experiments followed established protocols, as described previously [15]. Male Sprague–Dawley rats, aged 4 weeks (n = 14, Janvier Laboratories, France), were evenly divided into two groups of standard (SD, n = 7) and high‐fat diet (HFD, n = 7). While the SD group was fed the regular carbohydrate‐rich chow (LASQCdiet Rod16, altromin, Lage, Germany), the HFD group obtained a diet with 60% of calories as fat (Research Diets D12492, New Brunswick, NJ, USA). After 6 weeks, this induced insulin resistance and fatty liver (FL) disease in the HFD group, as confirmed by a glucose tolerance test (GTT) and 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the liver, respectively. The GTT was performed as described previously [15], one week before the DMI measurements.

For the DMI, sodium acetate‐d3 ([2H3]Na‐acetate) (Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) was dissolved in water (aqua ad iniectabilia) to a concentration of 2 M and intraperitoneally infused over 120 min [13] at a weight‐dependent infusion rate of 30.8–46.8 μL/min, resulting in a total administration of 1.5 g/kg body weight of acetate. This acetate concentration and infusion rate proved to be physiologically tolerable in both groups of animals.

2.1. Imaging Experiments

MR experiments were performed when the HFD group had developed FL disease, as verified by 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Following an overnight fast (12–16 h), rats were anesthetized with isoflurane (2%–3% in air). During anesthesia, a heating pad kept their body core temperature stable and breathing and heart rate were monitored (SA Instruments, Stony Brook, NY, USA).

2.2. Deuterium Metabolic Imaging

For the acetate DMI experiments, we used a 9.4T BioSpec 94/30 (Bruker BioSpin, Ettlingen, Germany) MR system with ParaVision 360.3.3. The animals were positioned prone with the liver atop a 2H/1H surface coil (Rapid, Rimpar, Germany). DMI measurements were performed according to the procedure set up in a prior study [15]. To acquire the anatomical 1H MR images, an axial T1‐weighted FLASH sequence (TR = 30 ms, FA = 70°, NA = 20, matrix = 120 × 120, FOV = 50 × 36 mm2) was applied. Nonlocalized 2H MRS control data were obtained using a pulse‐acquire sequence (TR = 400 ms, NA = 384, 2048 spectral points, bandwidth = 5.21 kHz, acquisition time = 2.5 min). The unlocalized measurements served only as a fast control during the measurements and were not quantified.

Localized 2H MRS data were acquired with a 3‐dimensional chemical shift imaging (CSI) sequence (TR = 100 ms, FA = 52.7°, NA = 36, 512 spectral points, matrix = 12 × 12 × 8 mm3, FOV = 50 × 36 × 20 mm3, bandwidth 6.06 kHz, acquisition time = 10.3 min, no motion correction applied). The infusion started after measuring the natural abundance water signal, with nonlocalized and localized measurements performed 10 times over a 130‐min study duration.

The intrahepatic fat content (HCL) was calculated from a single‐voxel MRS, employing short TE stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM) (TE = 5.5 ms, TR = 3000 ms, FA = 69.5°, NA = 64, 2048 spectral points, VOI = 6 × 6 × 6 mm3, bandwidth = 7.9 kHz, respiratory gated, acquisition time = 3.2 min), following established protocols from prior research [17].

2.3. MRS Processing

For pre‐processing and analyzing the DMI data we used the AMARES [18] time domain algorithm within jMRUI (v7.0) [19]. Spectra of interest were manually chosen from the CSI grid nonblinded, based on the respective voxel's position within the liver parenchyma, ensuring adequate SNR (visual check) and sufficient distance from the subcutaneous fat layer. The accepted spectra were located in the ventral part of the liver close to the surface coil to ensure sufficient signal. The selected spectra were frequency‐aligned and averaged to generate one spectrum per time point, then quantified using linear least‐squares fitting with a predefined set of prior knowledge. In this set, the starting value for the signal position for acetate was set to 1.9 ppm (constrained to the range of 1.7–2.0 ppm), for Glx to 2.35 ppm (range 2.1–2.6 ppm), and for water to 4.7 ppm (range 4.6–4.8 ppm). The linewidth was soft constrained to 10–40 Hz for acetate, 10–30 Hz for Glx, and 30–75 Hz for water. All peaks were fitted with a Lorentzian line shape. Figure 2 shows an exemplary fitted spectrum with the three identified peaks. The liver's naturally abundant deuterated water (HDO) signal before infusion served as an internal reference for quantification (8.94 mM) [13]. To convert the signal intensities to absolute concentrations (mM), the number of deuterons per molecule (three for acetate and two for Glx, Figure 1) was used as a normalization factor.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Example of a DMI spectrum showing the three signals (water, Glx, acetate) that could be identified following the acetate infusion. (a) The CSI spectrum averaged over all time points, (b) the individual fitted peaks with HDO (dark blue), Glx (lilac), and acetate (bright blue), and (c) the entire fitted spectrum. For visual reasons, the averaged spectrum in panel (a) was zero‐filled.

The HCL was calculated from 1H STEAM data via the signal intensities of water (W) and lipids (L, signals at 1.3 and 0.9 ppm) to HCL = [L/(L + W)], expressed as a percentage. The average HCL of all SD and HFD animals was determined, respectively, and the standard deviation was calculated. The results are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).

2.4. Statistics

The results of the phenotyping characterization and the metabolite concentrations over time are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). GTT was additionally evaluated by calculating the area under the curve (AUC). The AUC was also determined to assess the time course of the DMI‐based hepatic acetate concentrations. The AUC for the GTT and intrahepatic glucose and fatty acid concentration were determined using the trapezoid rule (AUC = (C1 + C2)/2(t2 − t1)). Group distinctions were analyzed via a two‐way repeated measures ANOVA, with statistical significance at p < 0.05. To test if individual time points show significant differences in the acetate or Glx signal between the two groups, we performed a post‐hoc analysis. Effect size was calculated as an additional parameter to evaluate the different phenotypes of the two animal groups. GraphPad Prism 8.2.1 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for statistical calculations.

3. Results

The phenotypes of the healthy and metabolically compromised animals were confirmed by GTT (AUCHFD = 20,595 ± 1370 g/dL▯min−1, AUCSD = 15,590 ± 1128 g/dL▯min−1, p = 0.01) and 1H MRS (mean HCL HFD = 5.8 ± 2.0% vs. SD = 0.9 ± 0.4%, p < 0.01). The effect size indicated notable differences between the two groups across all assessed parameters (Table 1). Acetate DMI acquisition using 3D CSI provided adequate SNR and spectral resolution in both metabolically healthy and impaired rodents, enabling the identification of three metabolite peaks across multiple 2H MRS imaging (MRSI) voxels (SNRSD = 36.8 ± 4.6, SNRHFD = 22.9 ± 1.7). Figure 3 displays localized spectra for one representative animal per group during the acetate infusion experiment, demonstrating the presence of the acetate and the HDO peaks and identifying a Glx peak.

TABLE 1.

Phenotypic characteristics (mean ± SEM) of the study animals.

SD a (n = 7) HFD b (n = 7) p Effect size
Mass [g] 462.1 ± 8.2 539.2 ± 17.6 < 0.01 2.97
Intrahepatic fat content [%] 0.9 ± 0.1 5.8 ± 0.6 < 0.01 12.20
Fasted blood glucose [mg/dL] 105.2 ± 2.9 114.8 ± 3.0 0.04 1.05
GTT c [mg/dL] 60 min 141.6 ± 6.6 187.2 ± 11.1 < 0.01 2.17
90 min 128.0 ± 1.2 151.0 ± 7.3 < 0.01 6.01
a

Standard diet.

b

High‐fat diet.

c

Glucose tolerance test.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

2H MR spectra after glucose injection in one exemplary animal of the healthy (SD, (a)) and the FL group (HFD, (b)). The spectrum in the front shows the baseline signal before infusion. A Glx peak emerged as a downstream metabolic product during the acetate breakdown. The SD animal clearly indicates the rise in HDO due to label loss in the TCA cycle (Figure 1). The panel on the right displays color‐coded amplitudes of acetate and Glx signals in 2H MRSI voxels over time co‐registered with liver parenchyma.

After 1 h of infusion, the intrahepatic acetate concentration in obese animals was similar to that in healthy animals (cHFD = 5.6 ± 1.1 mM, cSD = 6.9 ± 1.5 mM, p = 0.42) (Figure 4a). The area under the curve also revealed no significant group effect (AUCHFD = 717.9 ± 131.1 mM▯min−1, AUCSD = 605.1 ± 119.9 mM▯min−1, p = 0.62) and no significant time‐group interaction (p = 0.96). However, the time effect was significant (p = 0.0002).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Acetate (a), Glx (b), and HDO (c) concentrations during the 130‐min study in SD (blue) and HFD (purple) animals. Data are mean ± SEM.

We could observe an increase in Glx as a metabolic product of the acetate breakdown in both animal groups throughout the measurement (Figure 3 and Figure 4b), with no significant difference between the groups (AUCHFD = 113.6 ± 23.8 mM▯min−1, AUCSD = 136.7 ± 41.7 mM▯min−1, p = 0.68). Here, both the time‐group interaction (p = 0.02) and the time effect (p = 0.007) of the ANOVA showed a significant difference. Despite the difference in the time‐group effect, the post‐hoc analysis revealed no significant differences for individual time points in Glx or acetate signal with all p‐values above 0.81. The continuous rise in HDO over time was similar for both groups (p = 0.80, Figure 4c), showing no difference in water labeling between control and diseased animals.

4. Discussion

This study investigated intrahepatic acetate metabolism in healthy and FL rats using DMI. Based on findings from previous investigations where we could not observe hepatic Glx signal after 2H glucose infusion [15], we tested acetate as an alternative tracer to gain insights into hepatic TCA cycle activity. We did not observe a significant difference in hepatic acetate uptake between healthy and impaired animals. Nevertheless, we documented the acetate breakdown by identifying an increasing Glx peak as a resulting metabolic product in both groups.

4.1. Label Transition in the TCA Cycle

Both animal groups consistently exhibited a clear increase in hepatic HDO concentration over time, suggesting a label transfer from acetate to water during the metabolic breakdown. While kinetic isotope effects arising from proton substitution with deuterons offer one explanation, in vivo studies have shown their relatively minor impact [20]. Labels are predominantly lost in the TCA cycle due to keto‐enol tautomerism (Figure 1). Within the mitochondrion, acetyl‐CoA synthetase 1 (ACSS1) transforms the labeled acetate into 2H acetyl‐CoA, initiating its entry into the TCA cycle. During the conversion from acetyl‐CoA to citrate, the first deuteron is passed over to the HDO. The breakdown continues with 2H citrate turning into isocitrate and α‐ketoglutarate. Parts of the latter undergo exchange with glutamate dehydrogenase, resulting in 2H glutamine and/or 2H glutamate formation [21, 22]. This contributes, at least partially, to the observed increase in intrahepatic Glx concentration in both rodent groups. Following this, α‐ketoglutarate leads to the generation of succinate via succinyl‐CoA and the conversion to fumarate. Here, the potential loss of the second 2H atom may occur. Subsequently, fumarate converts to malate, which finally transforms into oxaloacetate, possibly losing the last deuteron [12].

It is not clear yet if an increase in HDO can be attributed mostly to metabolic processes in the liver, as HDO rapidly interacts with the body's water pool and therefore will not solely indicate liver metabolism [20]. However, the concurrent increase in HDO and Glx concentrations over time reveals metabolic activity in the liver, suggesting that such a strong rise in hepatic HDO very likely indicates hepatic metabolism. Nonetheless, the identifiable Glx signal emerging in both animal groups demonstrates that we can trace the metabolic breakdown of acetate via the TCA cycle using DMI.

4.2. Acetate for Imaging Metabolic Processes in Vivo

Administering acetate as a substrate for metabolic imaging proved challenging, requiring careful consideration of injection quantity and methodology to ensure both physiological tolerability and adequate signal intensity for peak identification. To achieve a detectable acetate signal, the injection solution had to be produced in a way that the osmolarity turned out to be very high. This led to an instant death of the animals when injected intravenously as a bolus in pilot experiments for this study. Infusing the acetate intraperitoneally over a long period ensures tolerability while providing a satisfactory signal. The substantial intragroup variability underscores the complexity of acetate administration for imaging purposes, highlighting its intricate suitability as a substrate. The resulting injection duration of 120 min used in this experiment imposed certain constraints on observing downstream metabolic processes (see limitations section). This limitation may partly explain the rare utilization of acetate DMI to date. Nevertheless, combining DMI with acetate infusion presents a viable methodological approach for metabolic imaging, despite the absence of discernible group differences in our study. We present a physiologically bearable experimental procedure that is comparable to glucose DMI measurements under similar experimental conditions, demonstrating the potential of acetate as a metabolic tracer.

4.3. Prospects for DMI and Future Perspectives

In this study, we demonstrated acetate breakdown by detecting the downstream metabolic product Glx in the DMI spectra. Consequently, acetate emerges as a more suitable substrate for imaging short‐term hepatic lipid metabolism, contrasting with prior DMI research that failed to detect Glx peaks following palmitic acid administration consistently [15]. Back then, we attributed this in part to the relatively small Glx pool size in the liver compared to the brain, where Glx has been measured with DMI before [13]. Nonetheless, our current study shows that the hepatic lipid metabolism yields sufficient amounts of Glx to be detected with DMI.

To enhance the understanding of the role of mitochondrial lipid oxidation in the pathogenesis of MASLD, Befroy et al. [23] introduced a 13C‐MRS‐based method for noninvasive measurement of mitochondrial oxidative rates in vivo. In this context, they demonstrated the significance of acetate in elucidating the potential impact of altered oxidative metabolism in the etiology of fatty liver. Since acetate metabolism can serve as a surrogate for fatty acid oxidation [13] and given the importance of this topic, DMI could offer a robust, more sensitive, and technically simpler alternative to 13C liver MRS, additionally providing increased morphologic or time‐resolution. These characteristics make DMI an attractive tool for potential integration into clinical investigations. However, the primary drawbacks, namely prolonged scan durations and limited spatial resolution, pose challenges that must be tackled. Recent research has aimed to address these limitations, particularly emphasizing on expediting data acquisition methods [8, 24, 25].

4.4. Limitations

To ensure physiological tolerance to acetate in animals, a bolus injection is impractical and necessitates infusion over an extended period. With our study design, this limitation precludes the comprehensive monitoring of acetate breakdown and degradation. Nonetheless, demonstrating the viability of imaging acetate metabolism using DMI and tracing the acetate metabolism at least in the first steps of the TCA cycle is achievable with acetate administration via infusion.

We investigated acetate DMI at 9.4T with only small differences in the chemical shifts of acetate and Glx being resolved, despite the high field strength. Thus, with the current knowledge and technical possibilities, it may be challenging to translate acetate DMI into clinics. Further research could deal with finding a way to produce better tolerable acetate solutions that still yield sufficient SNR to detect the acetate signal in DMI spectra.

Furthermore, no significant differences in acetate uptake were observed between animals with healthy and fatty livers, thus limiting the strength of our conclusions. This can be partly related to the small sample size in the presented experiment.

Another potential limitation of exact quantitative results of any DMI study using natural abundance HDO signal as a concentration reference may be the variation of natural abundance 2H across the planet. The calculation of De Feyter and colleagues [13] in the first paper introducing DMI for metabolic imaging in vivo is based on a publication by Harris et al. [26], however, we do not know if these values are specific to Connecticut, which would be different to our site. Our calculations are based on De Feyter's work, which may lead to an inaccuracy in the numbers for deuterated metabolite concentrations.

Future studies should explore acetate DMI combined with PET or 13C MRS to validate the differentiation ability of DMI for tracing hepatic acetate metabolism and enhance the understanding and utility of DMI in assessing liver metabolism and disease progression. Acetate DMI could be complemented with [11C]acetate PET to address this limitation, as previous research has shown elevated hepatic uptake of [11C]acetate in subjects with hepatic liver disease (steatosis) [27]. Additionally, this study identified a correlation between [11C]acetate uptake and the severity of steatosis. Therefore, integrating multimodal acetate PET/DMI could elucidate differences in acetate metabolism between healthy and diseased livers. In this context, however, the different metabolic conditions between [11C]acetate for PET tracing natural levels of plasma acetate and the 2H acetate used for DMI acting as a substrate at much higher concentrations have to be considered.

5. Conclusion

We could demonstrate the feasibility of DMI for assessing acetate metabolism in rats with healthy and fatty livers, revealing the metabolic breakdown by detecting intrahepatic Glx production in both groups. Combined with complementary methods such as PET, mass spectrometry, or electron microscopy, DMI could contribute to unraveling the complexity of the nutrient flux in different metabolic conditions and its contribution to FL and gain a deeper insight into metabolic alterations related to FL disease.

Supporting information

Figure S1. Original spectrum, fitted spectrum, and individual fitted peaks of the two exemplary animals shown in Figure 3 (SD in the left panel, HFD in the right) 91 min after the start of the acetate infusion.

NBM-38-e5309-s001.docx (179.9KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

Nonfinancial support was granted by Bruker (Ettlingen, Germany) as part of a collaborative partnership. We acknowledge the core facility ISI‐MR, co‐funded by the Czech‐BioImaging large RI project (LM2023050 funded by MEYS CR), for the technical support with jMRUI.

Funding: This work was funded by the Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF #LS19‐046).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/y8pt5/, reference number DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/Y8PT5.

References

  • 1. Maurice J. and Manousou P., “Non‐Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease,” Clinical Medicine 18, no. 3 (2018): 245–250, 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-3-245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Gastaldelli A., “Insulin Resistance and Reduced Metabolic Flexibility: Cause or Consequence of NAFLD?,” Clinical Science 131, no. 22 (2017): 2701–2704, 10.1042/CS20170987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Satapati S., Kucejova B., Duarte J. A. G., et al., “Mitochondrial Metabolism Mediates Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Fatty Liver,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 125, no. 12 (2015): 4447–4462, 10.1172/JCI82204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Adamson P. M., Datta K., Watkins R., Recht L. D., Hurd R. E., and Spielman D. M., “Deuterium Metabolic Imaging for 3D Mapping of Glucose Metabolism in Humans With Central Nervous System Lesions at 3T,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 91, no. 1 (2024): 39–50, 10.1002/mrm.29830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Serés Roig E., De Feyter H. M., Nixon T. W., et al., “Deuterium Metabolic Imaging of the Human Brain in Vivo at 7 T,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 89, no. 1 (2023): 29–39, 10.1002/mrm.29439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Taglang C., Batsios G., Mukherjee J., et al., “Deuterium Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Enables Noninvasive Metabolic Imaging of Tumor Burden and Response to Therapy in Low‐Grade Gliomas,” Neuro‐Oncology 24, no. 7 (2022): 1101–1112, 10.1093/neuonc/noac022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Hendriks A. D., Veltien A., Voogt I. J., Heerschap A., Scheenen T. W. J., and Prompers J. J., “Glucose Versus Fructose Metabolism in the Liver Measured With Deuterium Metabolic Imaging,” Frontiers in Physiology 14 (2023): 1198578, 10.3389/fphys.2023.1198578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Gursan A., Hendriks A. D., Welting D., De Jong P. A., Klomp D. W. J., and Prompers J. J., “Deuterium Body Array for the Simultaneous Measurement of Hepatic and Renal Glucose Metabolism and Gastric Emptying With Dynamic 3D Deuterium Metabolic Imaging at 7 T,” NMR in Biomedicine 36, no. 8 (2023): e4926, 10.1002/nbm.4926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Flocke V., Temme S., Bouvain P., Grandoch M., and Flögel U., “Noninvasive Assessment of Metabolic Turnover During Inflammation by in Vivo Deuterium Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy,” Frontiers in Immunology 14 (2023): 1258027, 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1258027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kaggie J. D., Khan A. S., Matys T., et al., “Deuterium Metabolic Imaging and Hyperpolarized 13C‐MRI of the Normal Human Brain at Clinical Field Strength Reveals Differential Cerebral Metabolism,” NeuroImage 257 (2022): 119284, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Perry R. J., Peng L., Barry N. A., et al., “Acetate Mediates a Microbiome–Brain–β‐Cell Axis to Promote Metabolic Syndrome,” Nature 534, no. 7606 (2016): 213–217, 10.1038/nature18309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Wang T., Zhu X., Li H., et al., “Noninvasive Assessment of Myocardial Energy Metabolism and Dynamics Using in Vivo Deuterium MRS Imaging,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 86, no. 6 (2021): 2899–2909, 10.1002/mrm.28914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. De Feyter H. M., Behar K. L., Corbin Z. A., et al., “Deuterium Metabolic Imaging (DMI) for MRI‐Based 3D Mapping of Metabolism in Vivo,” Science Advances 4, no. 8 (2018): eaat7314, 10.1126/sciadv.aat7314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Zou C., Ruan Y., Li H., et al., “A New Deuterium‐Labeled Compound [2,3,4,6,6′‐2H5]‐D‐Glucose for Deuterium Magnetic Resonance Metabolic Imaging,” NMR in Biomedicine 36, no. 7 (2023): e4890, 10.1002/nbm.4890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ehret V., Ustsinau U., Friske J., et al., “Evaluation of Hepatic Glucose and Palmitic Acid Metabolism in Rodents on High‐Fat Diet Using Deuterium Metabolic Imaging,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (2024): jmri.29437, 10.1002/jmri.29437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. De Feyter H. M., Thomas M. A., Behar K. L., and De Graaf R. A., “NMR Visibility of Deuterium‐Labeled Liver Glycogen in Vivo,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 86, no. 1 (2021): 62–68, 10.1002/mrm.28717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hackl M. T., Fürnsinn C., Schuh C. M., et al., “Brain Leptin Reduces Liver Lipids by Increasing Hepatic Triglyceride Secretion and Lowering Lipogenesis,” Nature Communications 10, no. 1 (2019): 2717, 10.1038/s41467-019-10684-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Vanhamme L., Van Den Boogaart A., and Van Huffel S., “Improved Method for Accurate and Efficient Quantification of MRS Data With Use of Prior Knowledge,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance 129, no. 1 (1997): 35–43, 10.1006/jmre.1997.1244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Stefan D., Cesare F. D., Andrasescu A., et al., “Quantitation of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Signals: The jMRUI Software Package,” Measurement Science and Technology 20, no. 10 (2009): 104035, 10.1088/0957-0233/20/10/104035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. De Feyter H. M. and De Graaf R. A., “Deuterium Metabolic Imaging – Back to the Future,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance 326 (2021): 106932, 10.1016/j.jmr.2021.106932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Chen Ming Low J., Wright A. J., Hesse F., Cao J., and Brindle K. M., “Metabolic Imaging With Deuterium Labeled Substrates,” Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 134–135 (2023): 39–51, 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2023.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Den Besten G., Lange K., Havinga R., et al., “Gut‐Derived Short‐Chain Fatty Acids Are Vividly Assimilated Into Host Carbohydrates and Lipids,” American Journal of Physiology. Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 305, no. 12 (2013): G900–G910, 10.1152/ajpgi.00265.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Befroy D. E., Perry R. J., Jain N., et al., “Direct Assessment of Hepatic Mitochondrial Oxidative and Anaplerotic Fluxes in Humans Using Dynamic 13C Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy,” Nature Medicine 20, no. 1 (2014): 98–102, 10.1038/nm.3415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Nam K. M., Gursan A., Bhogal A. A., et al., “Deuterium echo‐planar Spectroscopic Imaging (EPSI) in the Human Liver in Vivo at 7 t ,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 90, no. 3 (2023): 863–874, 10.1002/mrm.29696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Poli S., Emara A. F., Lange N. F., et al., “Interleaved Trinuclear MRS for Single‐Session Investigation of Carbohydrate and Lipid Metabolism in Human Liver at 7T,” NMR in Biomedicine 37, no. 8 (2024): e5123, 10.1002/nbm.5123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Harris R. K., Becker E. D., Cabral De Menezes S. M., Goodfellow R., and Granger P., “NMR Nomenclature: Nuclear Spin Properties and Conventions for Chemical Shifts. IUPAC Recommendations 2001. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. Physical Chemistry Division. Commission on Molecular Structure and Spectroscopy,” Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry 40, no. 7 (2002): 489–505, 10.1002/mrc.1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Nejabat M., Leisser A., Karanikas G., et al., “[11C]Acetate PET as a Tool for Diagnosis of Liver Steatosis,” Abdominal Radiology 43, no. 11 (2018): 2963–2969, 10.1007/s00261-018-1558-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1. Original spectrum, fitted spectrum, and individual fitted peaks of the two exemplary animals shown in Figure 3 (SD in the left panel, HFD in the right) 91 min after the start of the acetate infusion.

NBM-38-e5309-s001.docx (179.9KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/y8pt5/, reference number DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/Y8PT5.


Articles from Nmr in Biomedicine are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES