Skip to main content
Materials Today Bio logoLink to Materials Today Bio
. 2024 Nov 27;29:101367. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101367

99mTc/90Y radiolabeled biodegradable gel microspheres for lung shutting fraction assessment and radioembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma theranostics

Yi Dong a,1, Lingling Yin a,1, Jintao Huang b,1, Di Hu b, Jing Sun a, Zhe Zhang a, Zhihao Li a, Bin-Yan Zhong b,⁎⁎, Ran Zhu a,⁎⁎⁎, Guanglin Wang a,
PMCID: PMC11647226  PMID: 39687798

Abstract

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is a well-established clinical therapy for the treatment of patients with intermediate to advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or those who are ineligible for radical treatment. However, commercialized radioactive microspheres still have some issues, such as high density, complicated preparation, non-biodegradability. Furthermore, the use of different radioactive microspheres during TARE and lung shunt fraction assessment has led to inconsistencies in biodistribution in certain cases. This study employed biodegradable hyaluronic acid (HA) as the backbone and modified with bisphosphonate and methacrylic acid to prepare biodegradable gel microspheres (HAMS) using the water-in-oil emulsification and photo-crosslinking for labeling the diagnostic radionuclide of 99mTc and therapeutic radionuclide of 90Y. Both 99mTc radiolabeled HAMS (99mTc-HAMS) and radiolabeled 90Y-HAMS (90Y-HAMS) were highly efficient in radiolabeling and exhibited excellent radiostability in vitro and in vivo. 99mTc-HAMS are highly effective in assessing the LSF, while 90Y-HAMS, administered though TARE, are effective in inhibiting the growth of in situ HCC without any side effects. Both 99mTc-HAMS and 90Y-HAMS have promising clinical applications in HCC theranostics.

Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma, Transarterial radioembolization, Radioactive microspheres, Lung shunt fraction assessment, Biodegradable microspheres

Graphical abstract

Image 1

1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common and life-threatening disease that has a significant impact on public health and causes a substantial economic burden [1]. The mainstay approaches for HCC include resection, transplantation, percutaneous ablation, transarterial therapies, and systemic therapies [[2], [3], [4]]. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is offered for patients with intermediate-stage HCC and for very early and early-stage HCC patients in whom the former treatment options are not feasible [[5], [6], [7], [8]]. It involves delivering radioactive microspheres to the liver tumor through the hepatic artery, which releases radiation from radionuclides to kill the tumor cells [[9], [10], [11]]. Furthermore, TARE in conjunction with other modalities, such as photothermal therapy, demonstrates considerable inhibitory effects on hepatocellular carcinoma and represents a potentially exploitable treatment modality [12,13].

Commercial microspheres currently available in the market include TheraSphere™ (90Y-labeled glass microspheres manufactured by Boston Scientific), USA, SIR-Spheres® (90Y-labeled resin microspheres) manufactured by Sirtex Medical Ltd., Australia [14], and QuiremSpheres® (166Ho-PLA microspheres) manufactured by Quirem Medical B.V., The Netherlands [15,16]. Glass microspheres, due to their high density, can be challenging to formulate into suspensions [17]. However, they are non-biodegradable and can lead to uneven distribution within the tumor, resulting in permanent retention in the body. Resin microspheres have a low specific activity and a certain radionuclide leaching rate. Reactor activation is necessary for the production of 166Ho microspheres [18]. Long-time neutron activation can cause PLA microspheres to lose their spherical shape, rendering them unsuitable for interventional drug delivery.

Prior to TARE, it is mandatory to perform lung shunt fraction (LSF) assessment [19]. The imaging agent used for this purpose is 99mTc radiolabeled micro aggregate albumin (99mTc-MAA), which consists of micro albumin particles ranging from 10 to 100 μm [20]. However, due to the large size distribution of 99mTc-MAA, it is not an accurate method to assess LSF in vessels affected by HCC [[21], [22]], [[21], [22]] which is crucial in determining the patient's suitability for TARE. Therefore, a biodegradable microsphere that can be used for both LSF assessment and TARE is desirable.

Hyaluronic acid (HA), also known as hyaluronan, is a linear glycine-glucosaminoglycan composed of N-acetyl D-glucosamine and D-glucuronic acid [23]. It is a high molecular weight acidic mucopolysaccharide. In the skin, HA accounts for over 50 % of the total HA in the body [24]. HA possesses unique viscoelasticity, excellent biocompatibility, and non-immunogenicity [25,26]. In addition, HA is a biodegradable material that can freely diffuse and degrade between tissues. Hyaluronidase HYALs are present in the liver, where they cleave hyaluronic acid into medium-sized fragments. Subsequently, these fragments are then internalized and degraded to monosaccharides by a combination of lysosomal hyaluronidases and exoglycosidases [[27], [28], [29], [30]]. It is widely used in the clinical setting as a key biomaterial due to its excellent biocompatibility [31]. Nano and micron particles made from HA are commonly used as a carrier for controlled release drug delivery and local radiotherapy due to their excellent properties [32]. For example, S. Kim. et al. synthesized a locally injectable 131I-labeled biodegradable HAMA microgel that showed great local retention and high biocompatibility [33]. Moreover, gel microspheres made from HA have a smooth surface, uniform size, perfect sphericity, and varying elasticity, making it an ideal material for interventional embolization [34].

This study describes the development of biodegradable gel microspheres (HAMS) created from HA derivatives that have been modified with methacrylic (MA) and bisphosphonate (BP) groups. The HAMS were prepared using water-in-oil emulsification and photo-crosslinking [35]. They contain bisphosphonate that can be labeled with diagnostic radionuclide of 99mTc (γ, T1/2 = 6.0 h) and therapeutic radionuclide of 90Y (β, T1/2 = 2.64 days) through metal complexation. The 99mTc-HAMS were used for preoperative LSF assessment of TARE by SPECT/CT imaging, while 90Y-HAMS were used for TARE in rabbits with in situ HCC (Fig. 1). The study found that 99mTc-HAMS can be used to assess LSF and 90Y-HAMS can be used to inhibit HCC growth without significant side effects.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic drawing of preparation of 99mTc-HAMS and 90Y-HAMS, 99mTc-HAMS was used for assessment of LSF before radioembolization and 90Y-HAMS for TARE of HCC.

2. Experiment

Na99mTcO4 and 99mTc-MAA were purchased from Shanghai GMS Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. while 90YCl3 was obtained from Chengdu New Radiomedicine Technology Co., Ltd. All other chemicals were received and used commercially. The molecular weight of HA was 20–40 kDa.

2.1. Synthesis and characterization of HA derivatives and microspheres

4 mL of MA were added dropwise to 100 mL of a 2 % aqueous hyaluronic acid solution. The pH was then adjusted to 8–9 with 5 M NaOH [33]. The reaction was carried out in ice water for 24 h. Dialysis was performed in ultrapure water using dialysis bags (MW 8000–14000) for 3 days. After freeze-drying, the white spongy solid of HA-MA was characterized using NMR in deuterium water. The reaction mixture was prepared by adding 3.9 g of dicyclohexylcarbodiimide to 40 mL of 5 % aqueous HA-MA solution and incubating it for 30 min at 37 °C. Next, 4.8 g (41.6 mmol) of N-hydroxysuccinimide was added, and the reaction was maintained for 6 h. Separately, 3.4 g (10.4 mmol) of alendronate trihydrate and 1.3 g (10.4 mmol) of 4-dimethylaminopyridine were dissolved in 15 mL of ultrapure water and added dropwise to the above solution for 48 h. After freeze-drying, 1H NMR hydrogen and 31P NMR spectra were performed on HA-MA-BP in deuterium water.

200 mg of HA-MA-BP was added to 2 mL of a 0.5 % (w/v) LAP solution. Next, 40 mL of n-octanol was mixed with a 10 % volume of Spectra 80 (Sp-80) to make a 10 % (v/v) n-octanol solution. The oil phase was stirred while the aqueous phase was slowly added. The reaction solution was then irradiated with UV light at a wavelength of 365 nm for 10 min to solidify the small droplets of the aqueous phase that were dispersed in the oil phase, resulting in the formation of microspheres. The microspheres were obtained through centrifugation and separation, and different sizes were achieved by a standard sieve. The morphology and size of the gel microspheres were measured by optical microscopy (Olympus, IX73, Japan) and scanning electron microscopy (Zeiss, EVO 18, Germany), respectively. For purpose of the evaluation of the deformability of the HAMS, compression deformation tests were performed on the microspheres under different physical pressures, and the morphological changes of the microspheres in aqueous solution were recorded under light microscopy before and after compression.

2.2. Radiolabeling and in vitro radiostability

1 mCi Na99mTcO4 solution (approximately 100 μL) was mixed with 20 μL of SnCl2 solution (1 mg/mL, pH = 1) for 5 min. Next, 100 μL of microsphere solution was added, and the reaction mixture was placed on a thermostatic homogenizer at 37 °C and 1500 rpm for 30 min. After the reaction, the microsphere solution was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 3 min and washed five times with deionized water to remove any free radionuclides. The resulting product was 99mTc-labeled hyaluronic acid gel microspheres (99mTc-HAMS). For the 90Y radiolabeling process, 1 mCi of 90Y was added to 5 mg of hyaluronic acid microspheres in 100 μL of deionized water. The mixture was then reacted at 50 °C for 50 min while shaking. After the reaction, the solution was washed five times with deionized water to remove any free radionuclides. This resulted in the production of 90Y-labeled hyaluronic acid gel microspheres (90Y-HAMS). The radiolabeling efficiency was determined by dividing the activity of 90Y-HAMS or 99mTc-HAMS by the added activity. The activity was measured using a dose calibrator (Capintec, CRC-25R, USA).

200 μCi of 99mTc-HAMS or 90Y-HAMS was added to 1 mL of PBS or 10 % FBS at room temperature. The activity of free radionuclides was measured using a gamma counter after centrifugation at various incubation times.

2.3. In vitro degradation assay

To assess the degradation of HAMS in the presence of hyaluronidase, the microspheres were dispersed in 1 mL of hyaluronidase PBS solution containing 600 IU/mL or 1200 IU/mL at 37 °C. Every three days, the HAMS were collected, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 3 min, and the resulting precipitate was collected, freeze-dried, and weighed. Furthermore, a fresh hyaluronidase PBS solution was replaced daily. The microspheres degradation rate was determined by calculating the mass ratio of the remaining to the initial mass of HAMS. In addition, SEM was employed to observe alterations in microsphere morphology (Zeiss, EVO 18, Germany).

2.4. Cytotoxicity and immunofluorescence cell assay

The cytotoxicity of microspheres was investigated by incubating various concentrations or activity of HAMS, 99mTc-HAMS or 90Y-HAMS ranging from 0 to 1000 g/mL or 0–50 μCi incubated in HUVEC, McA-RH7777, and VX2 cells at 37 °C 5 % CO2 atmospheres for 24 h. Residual microspheres and culture medium were then removed with PBS. Next, 100 μL of DMEM and 10 μL of CCK-8 were added to the cells and cultured for 1 h. The absorbance of each well at 450 nm was measured using a multifunctional microplate reader (Thermo Scientific, Varioskan Flash, Japan).

VX2 cells were cultured on cell slides and incubated with HAMS, 99mTc-HAMS, and 90Y-HAMS for 24 h. The cells were washed with PBS three times after 15 min of 4 % paraformaldehyde fixation. Following this, 0.5 % of Triton X-100 was added to the cells to rupture the cell membrane for 15 min. The cells were rinsed twice with PBS and then treated with 5 % bovine serum albumin in Tris-buffered saline solution for 1 h at 37 °C. Then, the cells were incubated with anti-histone γH2AX mouse monoclonal antibodies incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. After washing with PBS five times, the cells were then exposed to rabbit anti-mouse secondary antibody for 1 h at 37 °C in the dark. Finally, the nuclei were stained with Hoechst (20 μL, 5 mg/mL) for 5 min. Fluorescence imaging was performed at the end using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus FV1200, Japan). The resulting fluorescence images were analyzed using ImageJ software.

2.5. In vivo imaging

To assess the imaging capability of 99mTc-HAMS, mice were intravenously injected with 99mTc-HAMS (500 μCi) and 99mTc-MAA (500 μCi) via the tail vein. The N1S1 tumor model was established as reported in the literature [36]. Rats with in situ N1S1 tumors were embolized with 99mTc-HAMS (500 μCi) via the hepatic artery. The biodistribution of radiolabeled microspheres was monitored using microSPECT/CT. The SPECT scan rate was set to 15 min per frame, and full-angle scanning (615 mA, 55 kV) was used for the CT scans. The PMOD software version 3.602 was used to analyze the SPECT images. Following the SPECT scan, the mice were sacrificed, and their major organs were harvested and weighed. The activity of each organ was measured using a gamma counter (Capintec, CRC-25R, USA).

2.6. Evaluation of vascular embolization

A total of 200 μL of HAMS (10 mg/mL) were injected into the middle artery of the rabbit's ear, and pressure was applied to stop bleeding. The morphological changes in the rabbit ear were continuously observed in order to assess the effect of microsphere embolization.

2.7. Antitumor therapy

To evaluate the tumor inhibition of 90Y-HAMS, white New Zeeland rabbits (weighing 3–3.5 kg) with VX2 in situ liver cancer model were used. Rabbits with tumor volumes ranging from 350 mm3 to 500 mm3 were divided into three groups: saline (control group), HAMS group, and 90Y-HAMS group. Saline (0.2 mL), HAMS (0.2 mL, 5 mg/mL), and 90Y-HAMS (0.2 mL, 5 mg/mL, 200 μCi) were embolized via transarterial administration. The tumor volume was monitored by enhanced CT on days 0, 7 and 14, and MRI on days 0 and 14. Liver enzymes, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), creatinine (CREA), glutamylglutamyltransferase (GGT), and urea (UREA), were measured by drawing dorsal auricular arterial blood on days 0, 1, 3, 7, and 14 after embolization to evaluate liver and kidney function. Additionally, the activity of the blood was measured using a gamma counter. On day 14 after embolization, the rabbits were euthanized and major organs including the heart, liver, spleen, lungs, kidneys, and tumors, were collected for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Tumor slices were also stained using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL).

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Synthesis and characterization of radiolabeled microspheres

To prepare the functional microspheres, HA was modified with MA and BP groups. MA was used for crosslinking during microsphere preparation, while BP was used for radiolabeling with 99mTc and 90Y. The synthesis of HA-MA-BP was carried out in two steps. Firstly, methacrylic anhydride was used to esterify the hydroxyl group of HA. Secondly, BP was used to condense with the carboxyl group of HA-MA through an amide reaction (Fig. 1). Fig. 2A showed the 1H NMR spectrum of HA and HA derivatives, which revealed the characteristic peaks of MA with chemical shifts at 5.77 ppm and 6.20 ppm, and the characteristic peak of BP with a chemical shift at 2.95 ppm, indicating the successful synthesis of HA-MA-BP (Fig. 2B). The grafting rate was calculated to be 70.9 % according 1H NMR spectrum (Fig. S1). The successful synthesis of HA-MA-BP was also confirmed by the presence of phosphate elements in the 31P NMR (Fig. 2C). HAMS was prepared using the water-in-oil method and standard sieves to obtain an optimal size of 30–50 μm for radioembolization. Fig. S2 showed the graph image of HAMS powder in a vial, while the optical microscopy image demonstrated that it was spherical and of uniform size in deionized water. Upon analysis of the images, it was found that the size of HAMS was 47.26 ± 4.52 μm with a narrow polydispersity index of 0.21 (Fig. 2D and E). Microspheres with a size of 30–50 μm are the most suitable for use as TARE [37]. Additionally, SEM images revealed the spherical shape and gel structure of HAMS, with surface holes clearly visible (Fig. 2F). The energy spectrum of SEM, as shown in Fig. 2G, demonstrated the presence of phosphate elements in HAMS, which further suggested that the successful synthesis of HA-MA-BP. The microspheres exhibited minimal deformation following compression tests at various pressures, as illustrated in Fig. 2H–and I.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

(A) The 1H NMR spectrum of HA, HA-MA and HA-MA-BP in deuterium water. (B) The chemical structure of HA-MA-BP. (C) The 31P NMR of HA-MA-BP in deuterium water. (D) Optical microscope image of suspensions of HAMS. (E) Histogram of HAMS analyzed from optical image. (F) SEM image of HAMS. (G) The energy spectrum of SEM of HAMS. (H) Pressure versus time curves for HAMS. (I) Optical image of microspheres following compression testing. (J) Radiolabeling efficiency of 99mTc-HAMS and 90Y-HAMS incubated with various temperatures. (K) Radiostability of 99mTc-HAMS and 90Y-HAMS in saline and 10 % FBS with various incubation times ranges from 0 h to 72 h, respectively. (L) The degradation rate curves of HAMS were generated on days 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21 after co-incubation with different concentrations of hyaluronidase. (M) SEM images of HAMS on days 0, 12, 18 and 21 following co-incubation with hyaluronidase (600 IU/mL).

The bisphosphate group complexes with metal ions and can be used to label metal radionuclides. The radiolabeling efficiency of 99mTc-HAMS was 97.3 ± 0.8 % at 60 °C with a 30-min reaction time, which increased with higher reaction temperatures (Fig. 2J). Similarly, the radiolabeling efficiency of 90Y-HAMS reached 100 % at 50 °C for a 50-min reaction time (Fig. 2J). The specific activity of 90Y-HAMS was 429.2 Bq per microspheres, which is considerably higher than that of the resin microsphere (75 Bq per microspheres). After radiolabeling, the size and morphology of the microspheres remained unchanged (Fig. S3). The radiostability of 99mTc-HAMS and 90Y-HAMS was investigated in PBS and 10 % FBS with varying incubation times at room temperature (Fig. 2K). The radiostability of 99mTc-HAMS was 97.19 ± 0.23 % in PBS and 92.35 ± 1.88 % in 10 % FBS after 4 h of incubation, which is higher than 95 % in PBS and 80 % in 10 % FBS even after 24 h incubation. These results indicated that 99mTc-HAMS have high radiostability. Similarly, the radiostability of 90Y-HAMS was 99.1 ± 0.21 % in PBS and 98 ± 0.15 % in 10 % FBS after 72 h of incubation higher than that of the resin microsphere (97 % in saline in 24 h) [38], suggesting that 90Y-HAMS also had excellent radiostability. Bisphosphate groups can effectively form stable complexes with metal ions [39]. The above results demonstrated that radiolabeled microspheres had excellent radiostability for further in vivo study.

3.2. Degradation study of HAMS

HA is a biodegradable polymer that can be degraded in the presence of hyaluronidase [40,41]. The in vitro degradation of HAMS in the presence of hyaluronidase was illustrated in Fig. 2L. The rate of its degradation increased in direct proportion to the hyaluronidase concentration. Furthermore, the SEM images demonstrated that the integrity of HAMS was compromised over time (Fig. 2M), indicating that HAMS can be degraded by hyaluronidase. The graphs also indicated that the integrity of HAMS was not significantly disrupted within 18 days, which meets our requirement of no or very little degradation within a half-life of 4–5 of 90Y. Moreover, the concentration of the enzyme in vivo was found to be lower than that observed in vitro [42], resulting in slower degradation times. Consequently, it can be concluded that HAMS undergo degradation following radioactive decay.

3.3. Cytotoxicity

Prior to further in vivo studies, the cytotoxicity of radiolabeled microspheres was evaluated using HUVEX, VX2, and McA-RH7777 cells. The cell viability of HUVEC and VX2 showed no significant changes with varying concentrations of HAMS from 0 to 1000 μm/mL (Fig. 3A). Additionally, no significant changes in cell viability were observed in HUVEC and McA-RH7777, even when the activity of 99mTc-HAMS was increased to 50 μCi (Fig. 3B). The decay process of 99mTc emits γ-rays, and the amount of γ-rays used for diagnosis is essentially nontoxic [43]. These results indicated that HAMS and 99mTc-HAMS have good biocompatibility and are safe for further in vivo studies. The cell viability of HUVEC and VX2 cells significantly decreased with increased incubation activity of 90Y-HAMS (Fig. 3C). At 12.5 μCi incubation, 49.1 ± 6.9 % of VX2 cells survived, while only 9.5 ± 2.2 % survived at 50 μCi incubation, indicating that 90Y-HAMS can effectively kill VX2 tumor cells. 90Y releases high-energy electrons during decay, which can effectively kill cells. It is often used as a therapeutic radionuclide to treat tumors [44,45]. Additionally, an immunofluorescence cell assay was used to test for DNA damage. The results showed no obvious DNA damage in HUVEC cells treated with HAMS and 99mTc-HAMS. However, the treatment with 90Y-HAMS resulted in significant DNA damage and lower VX2 density (Fig. 3D and E). The hemocompatibility of HAMS was also tested in blood, and no hemolysis was observed even at a concentration of 20 mg/mL (Fig. 3F and S4), further demonstrating the safety of HAMS. The cytotoxicity results indicated that 99mTc-HAMS are safe for imaging, while 90Y-HAMS can effectively kill cancer cells.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

(A) Cell relative viability of HUVEC and VX2 cells after co-incubation with various concentrations of HAMS ranging from 0 to 1000 μg/mL. (B) Relative cell viability of HUVEC and McA-RH 7777 cells after co-incubation with different activities of 99mTc-HAMS ranging from 0 to 50 μCi. (C) Relative cell viability of HUVEC and VX2 cells after co-incubation with different activities of 90Y-HAMS ranging from 0 to 50 μCi. (D) CLSM images of HUVEC and VX2 cells with different treatments (G1: saline, G2: 99mTc-HAMS, G3: 90Y-HAMS). (E) Analyzing from CLSM images, γH2AX intensity of DNA damage with different treatments (G1: saline, G2: 99mTc-HAMS, G3: 90Y-HAMS). (F) The percentage of hemolysis after co-incubation of diluted mouse blood with various concentrations of HAMS range from 0.5 mg/mL to 20 mg/mL at 37 °C. Hemolysis rate <2 % is considered nonhemolysis, 2%–5% is considered microhemolysis, and >5 % of the sample is considered hemolysis. P values were calculated by one-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple-comparison test, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.

3.4. In vivo imaging and biodistribution

Currently, 99mTc is the primary radionuclide used in medical diagnostics, accounting for 80 % of diagnostic radionuclides worldwide due to its excellent nuclear properties, suitable half-life, and convenient availability [[46], [47], [48]]. To evaluate the imaging of LSF with 99mTc-HAMS, mice were intravenously injected with 99mTc-HAMS and 99mTc-MAA through the tail vein and rats were injected with 99mTc-HAMS through the hepatic artery and visualized with microSPECT/CT. Following a tail vein injection, the microspheres were transported back to the right atrium via the inferior vena cava, where they were then distributed to the pulmonary capillaries via the left atrium. The microSPECT images showed that the radioactive signals were primarily present in the lungs immediately after the injection of 99mTc-HAMS and 99mTc-MAA, and in the kidneys and bladder over time (Fig. 4A). Additionally, the signal of 99mTc-MAA was detected in the thyroid gland. Nine hours after injection, the mice were euthanized, and their major organs were harvested for activity and mass measurements. The results indicated that 99mTc-HAMS were more trapped in the lungs than in to other organs, which were significantly enriched than 99mTc-MAA (184.7 ± 50.0 percentage of injection dose per gram (%ID/g) vs 119.8 ± 13.4 %ID/g) (Fig. 4B). The reason for this is likely since 99mTc-HAMS were spheres that range from 30 to 50 μm in size, which was too large for them to pass through capillaries. As a result, they were trapped more by the lungs. On the other hand, the commercial 99mTc-MAA particles had a larger size distribution and may not be well trapped in blood vessels (Fig. 4C). On the other hand, the use of same microspheres for both assessment and embolization may result in a more consistent distribution within the tumor. This suggests that 99mTc-HAMS provided better imaging of lung capillary blockage. In addition, microSPECT images of transhepatic arterial administration of 99mTc-HAMS in rats showed that HAMS was effectively retained in the volume of interest (VOI) without significant changes over time (Fig. 4D). Quantitatively, 99mTc-HAMS over 190 %ID/cc (percentage of injection dose per volume) remained in the VOI after 9 h and less than 3 %ID/cc in other organs (Fig. 4E). The above results demonstrated that 99mTc-HAMS can be effectively used as a diagnostic radiopharmaceutical for evaluating LSF before TARE.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

(A) SPECT/CT images of 99mTc-MAA and 99mTc-HAMS in mice intravenously injected via tail vein. (B) In vivo biodistribution of mice (n = 3) intravenously injected with 99mTc-MAA and 99mTc-HAMS at 9 h after injection. (C) Optical image of 99mTc-MAA suspension. (D) SPECT/CT images of rat injected with 99mTc-HAMS with hepatic artery injection. (E) The biodistribution of 99mTc-HAMS after hepatic artery injection quantified from SPECT images.

3.5. Evaluation of vascular embolization

Microspheres are typically endowed with some degree of embolic function [49]. To evaluate the embolic capacity of HAMS, an arterially injected rabbit ear model was employed. As shown in Fig. 5A, microspheres obstructed blood flow within the tiny blood vessels, resulting in the manifestation of ischemic necrosis at the ear margin. This indicated that HAMS were able to accurately enter the target site and produce an embolic at that site.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

(A) The graphs of rabbit ear over time (1, 3, 7, 10, 13, and 17 days) following microspheres embolization. (B) The enhanced CT of rabbits treated with different treatments (G1: saline, G2: HAMS, G3: 90Y-HAMS) by embolization administration. The tumors were highlighted with yellow dashed circles. (C) The temporal tumor volume was recorded after different treatments (n = 3). (D) MRI images (DWI) of rabbits treated with different treatments (G1: saline, G2: HAMS, G3: 90Y-HAMS) by embolization administration. The tumors were highlighted with yellow dashed circles. (E) Macroscopic images of VX2 tumor slices obtained 14 days post-treatment and stained with H&E and TUNEL, respectively. P values were calculated by one-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple-comparison test, ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.

3.6. In vivo antitumor

To evaluate the radioembolization capability of 90Y-HAMS, we used rabbit model with in situ VX2 tumor administered the treatment transarterial. The rabbits were divided into three groups, each consisting of three rabbits: saline group (200 μL), HAMS group (1 mg/200 μL), and 90Y-HAMS group (200 μCi, 1 mg/200 μL). CT scans were conducted at 0, 7, and 14 days after embolization, while MRI scans were conducted at 0 and 14 days after embolization. The CT and MRI images showed that there was a significantly reduction in tumor volume in the 90Y-HAMS group compared to the saline and HAMS groups (Fig. 5B–D and S5). On the fourteenth day of treatment, all rabbits were euthanized, and major organs and tumor tissues were taken for H&E staining. The tumor slices were then analyzed for terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick labeling (TUNEL) staining. Fig. 5E demonstrates that tumors in the 90Y-HAMS treatment group exhibited significant cell necrosis and apoptosis, while major organs remained undamaged (Fig. 6A). In comparison to non-degradable microspheres, HAMS are biocompatible and have a low inflammatory potential, rendering them safe for use, particularly in patients with poor liver function. Meanwhile, HAMS can be degraded after a period of time, allowing for secondary embolization [[50], [51], [52]]. The liver enzymes were tested on days 0, 1, 3, 7, and 14 after embolization. The levels of AST, ALP, GGT, and ALT were elevated after embolization but returned to normal levels within a week (Fig. 6B–G), which is a typical symptom of embolization procedures [53]. Meanwhile, activity of blood and feces was monitored at 1, 3, 7, and 14 days after treatment. The levels of activity of 90Y in both blood and feces were similar to the background levels after embolization, proving further evidence of the high stability of 90Y-HAMS in vivo. These results demonstrated that 90Y-HAMS can effectively inhibit tumor growth with high safety.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

(A) Macroscopic H&E staining images of different organs of VX2 tumor-bearing rats harvested 14 days post-treatment (G1: saline, G2: HAMS, G3: 90Y-HAMS). (B–G) Expression levels of UREA, AST, ALP, GGT, ALT, and CREA on days 0, 3, 7, and 14 after treatment (G1: Saline; G2: HAMS; G3: 90Y-HAMS), respectively.

4. Conclusion

In summary, novel microspheres radiolabeled with 99mTc and 90Y have been developed for LSF evaluation and TARE of HCC. Both 99mTc-HAMS and 90Y-HAMS are highly efficient in radiolabeling and exhibit excellent radiostability in vitro and in vivo. 99mTc-HAMS demonstrated an excellent ability to assess LSF, while 90Y-HAMS, when administered through interventional embolization, effectively inhibited the growth of in situ HCC without any side effects. Both 99mTc-HAMS and 90Y-HAMS show promising clinical theranostic applications.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Yi Dong: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Data curation, Conceptualization. Lingling Yin: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Data curation, Conceptualization. Jintao Huang: Methodology, Investigation. Di Hu: Methodology, Investigation. Jing Sun: Methodology, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Zhe Zhang: Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Conceptualization. Zhihao Li: Methodology, Investigation, Data curation. Bin-Yan Zhong: Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Ran Zhu: Writing – review & editing, Resources, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Data curation, Conceptualization. Guanglin Wang: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Resources, Project administration, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization.

Ethical statement

All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Soochow University, and all protocols of animal studies conformed to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of Soochow University, P. R. China.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the financial support from the National Natural Science Found of China (22076132, 21976128), the Interdisciplinary Basic Frontier Innovation Program of Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University (YXY2304038), the Project of State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection (GZC00401), and Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101367.

Contributor Information

Bin-Yan Zhong, Email: byzhongir@sina.com.

Ran Zhu, Email: zhuran@suda.edu.cn.

Guanglin Wang, Email: glwang@suda.edu.cn.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (1.7MB, docx)

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  • 1.Vogel A., Meyer T., Sapisochin G., Salem R., Saborowski A. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2022;400:1345–1362. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01200-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bouattour M., Mehta N., He A.R., Cohen E.I., Nault J.C. Systemic treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer. 2019;8:341–358. doi: 10.1159/000496439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Salem R., Tselikas L., Baere T.D. Interventional treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2022;77:1205–1206. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.03.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rimassa L., Pressiani T., Merle P. Systemic treatment options in hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer. 2019;8:427–446. doi: 10.1159/000499765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mokdad A.A., Singal A.G., Yopp A.C. Treatment of liver cancer. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2016;315:100. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dolgin E. Radioactive drugs emerge from the shadows to storm the market. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018;36:1125–1127. doi: 10.1038/nbt1218-1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sangro B., Salem R. Transarterial chemoembolization and radioembolization. Semin. Liver Dis. 2014;34:435–443. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1394142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xu X., Chen H., Zhao Z., Wang Y., He P., Cheng H., Gao X., Shi Y., Li Y., Huang J., Peng Y., Chu C., Zhang Y., Liu C., Li B., Mao J., Ma H., Liu G. Engineering radioactive microspheres for intra-arterial brachytherapy using radiation-induced graft polymerization. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023;33 [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Llovet J.M., De Baere T., Kulik L., et al. Locoregional therapies in the era of molecular and immune treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Gastro. Hepat. 2021;18:293–313. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-00395-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu Q., Qian Y., Li P., Zhang S., Liu J., Sun X., Fulham M., Feng D., Huang G., Lu W., Song S. 131I-labeled copper sulfide-loaded microspheres to treat hepatic tumors via hepatic artery embolization. Theranostics. 2018;8:785–799. doi: 10.7150/thno.21491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wu M., Shi K., Huang R., et al. Facile preparation of 177Lu-microspheres for hepatocellular carcinoma radioisotope therapy. Chinese Chem. Lett. 2022;33:3492–3496. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wu M., Zhang L., Shi K., et al. Polydopamine-coated radiolabeled microspheres for combinatorial radioembolization and photothermal cancer therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2023;15:12669–12677. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c19829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liu Q., Qian Y., Li P., Zhang S., Wang Z., Liu J., Sun X., Fulham M., Feng D., Chen Z., Song S., Lu Wei, Huang G. The combined therapeutic effects of 131iodine-labeled multifunctional copper sulfide-loaded microspheres in treating breast cancer. Acta Pharm. Sin. B. 2018;8:371–380. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2018.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Salem R., Padia S.A., Lam M., et al. Clinical, dosimetric, and reporting considerations for Y-90 glass microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: updated 2022 recommendations from an international multidisciplinary working group. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. 2022;I(50):328–343. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05956-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zielhuis S.W., Nijsen J.F.W., Figueiredo R., Feddes B., Vredenberg A.M., van het Schip A.D., Hennink W.E. Surface characteristics of holmium-loaded poly (l-lactic acid) microspheres. Biomaterials. 2005;26:925–932. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nijsen J.F.W., van het Schip A.D., van Steenbergen M.J., Zielhuis S.W., Kroon-Batenburg L.M.J., van de Weert M., van Rijk P.P., Hennink W.E. Influence of neutron irradiation on holmium acetylacetonate loaded poly (l-lactic acid) microspheres. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1831–1839. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00309-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Roncali E., Taebi A., Foster C., Vu C.T. Personalized dosimetry for liver cancer Y-90 radioembolization using computational fluid dynamics and Monte Carlo simulation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2020;48:1499–1510. doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02469-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Arranja A.G., Hennink W.E., Denkova A.G., et al. Radioactive holmium phosphate microspheres for cancer treatment. Int. J. Pharmaceut. 2018;548:73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.06.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.McGregor H., Hill M., Kuo P., Woodhead G., Patel M. Same-day repeat hepatopulmonary shunt measurement during planning angiography for hepatic radioembolization. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2020;31:1069–1073. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gill H., Hiller J. Systematic review of lung shunt fraction quantification comparing SPECT/CT and planar scintigraphy for yttrium 90 radioembolization planning. Clin Transl Imaging. 2021;9:181–188. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ahmadzadehfar H., Sabet A., Biermann K., Muckle M., Brockmann H., Kuhl C., et al. The significance of 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT liver perfusion imaging in treatment planning for 90Y-microsphere selective internal radiation treatment. J. Nucl. Med. 2010;51:1206–1212. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.074559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Uliel L., Royal H.D., Darcy M.D., Zuckerman D.A., Sharma A., Saad N.E. From the angio suite to the γ-camera: vascular mapping and 99mTc-MAA hepatic perfusion imaging before liver radioembolization - a comprehensive pictorial review. J. Nucl. Med. 2012;53:1736–1747. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.105361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Huerta-Angeles G., Nešporová K., Ambrozova G., Kubala L., Velebný V. An effective translation: the development of hyaluronan-based medical products from the physicochemical, and preclinical aspects. Front. Bioeng. Biotech. 2018;6:62. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Žádníková P., Šínová R., Pavlík V., Šimek M., Šafránková B., Hermannová M., Nešporová K., Velebný V. The degradation of hyaluronan in the skin. Biomolecules. 2022;12:251. doi: 10.3390/biom12020251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lei C., Liu X., Chen Q., Li Y., Zhou J., Zhou L., Zou T. Hyaluronic acid and albumin based nanoparticles for drug delivery. J. Control. Release. 2021;331:416–433. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.01.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Luo Z., Cai L., Bian F., Zhao Y. Microfluidic electrospray of multifunctional discal microparticles for wound healing. ACS Materials Letter. 2024;6:27–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Boonen M., Puissant E., Gilis F., Flamion B., Jadot M. Mouse liver lysosomes contain enzymatically active processed forms of Hyal-1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014;446:1155–1160. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.03.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Puissant E., Gilis F., Dogné S., Flamion B., Jadot M., Boonen M. Subcellular trafficking and activity of Hyal-1 and its processed forms in murine macrophages. Traffic. 2014;15:500–51548. doi: 10.1111/tra.12162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bourguignon L.Y., Singleton P.A., Diedrich F., Stern R., Gilad E. CD44 interaction with Na+-H+ exchanger (NHE1) creates acidic microenvironments leading to hyaluronidase-2 and cathepsin B activation and breast tumor cell invasion. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:26991–27007. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311838200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stern R., Kogan G., Jedrzejas M.J., Šoltés L. The many ways to cleave hyaluronan. Biotechnol. Adv. 2007;25:537–557. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Costa D.C.S., Costa P.D.C., Gomes M.C., Chandraker A., Wieringa P.A., Moroni L., Mano J.F. Universal strategy for designing shape memory hydrogels. ACS Materials Letter. 2023;4:701–706. doi: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.2c00107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang Y., Sun T., Jiang C. Biomacromolecules as carriers in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Acta Pharm. Sin. B. 2018;8:34–50. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2017.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kim S., Yim S.G., Chandrasekharan A., Seong K.Y., Lee T.W., Kim B., Kim K., Choi S., Yang S.Y. On-site fabrication of injectable 131I-labeled microgels for local radiotherapy. J. Control. Release. 2020;322:337–345. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.03.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shen Y., Zhang B., Yi Z., Zhang L., Ling J., Wang S., Sun Z., Iqbal M.Z., Kong X. Microfluidic fabrication of X-ray-visible sodium hyaluronate microspheres for embolization. RSC Adv. 2023;13:20512–20519. doi: 10.1039/d3ra02812g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jiang Q., Pu X., Deng C., Wang W., Liu Z., Xie R., Pan D., Zhang W., Ju X., Chu L. Microfluidic controllable preparation of iodine-131-labeled microspheres for radioembolization therapy of liver tumors. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2023;12 doi: 10.1002/adhm.202300873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Somasundaram V.H., Pillai R., Malarvizhi G., Ashokan A., Gowd S., Peethambaran R., Palaniswamy S., Unni A., Nair S., Koyakutty M. Biodegradable radiofrequency responsive nanoparticles for augmented thermal ablation combined with triggered drug release in liver tumors. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016;2(5):768–779. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.De La Vega J.C., Esquinas P.L., Rodríguez-Rodríguez C., Bokharaei M., Moskalev I., Liu D., Saatchi K., Häfeli U.O. Radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with built-in dosimetry: First in vivo results with uniformly-sized, biodegradable microspheres labeled with 188Re. Theranostics. 2019;9:868–883. doi: 10.7150/thno.29381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Avila-Rodriguez M.A., Selwyn R.G., Hampel J.A., Thomadsen B.R., Dejesus O.T., Converse A.K., Nickles R.J. Positron-emitting resin microspheres as surrogates of 90Y SIR-Spheres: a radiolabeling and stability study. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2007;34:585–590. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2007.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Galezowska J., Gumienna-Kontecka E. Phosphonates, their complexes and bio-applications: a spectrum of surprising diversity. Coordin. Chemis. Rev. 2012;256:105–124. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Buckley C., Montgomery T.R., Szank T., Murray B.A., Quigley C., Major I. Modification of hyaluronic acid to enable click chemistry photo-crosslinking of hydrogels with tailorable degradation profiles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023;240 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vasvani S., Kulkarni P., Rawtani D. Hyaluronic acid: a review on its biology, aspects of drug delivery, route of administrations and a special emphasis on its approved marketed products and recent clinical studies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020;151:1012–1029. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nedunchezian S., Wu C., Wu S., Chen C., Chang J., Wang C. Characteristic and chondrogenic differentiation analysis of hybrid hydrogels comprised of hyaluronic acid methacryloyl (HAMA), gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA), and the acrylate-functionalized nano-silica crosslinker. Polymers. 2022;14:2003. doi: 10.3390/polym14102003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sangro B., Maini C.L., Ettorre G.M., et al. Radioembolisation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma that have previously received liver-directed therapies. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. I. 2018;45:1721–1730. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-3968-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liu P., Johnson S.E., Xie X., Gao L., Haney C.R., Zhao M., Jin J. Targeted design of a recombinant tracer for SPECT renal imaging. Theranostics. 2021;11:9118–9132. doi: 10.7150/thno.60132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jiang Z., Yang F., Wang W. Applications of yttrium-90 (90Y) in hepatocellular carcinoma. OncoTargets Ther. 2024;17:149–157. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S445898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kennedy A., Brown D.B., Feilchenfeldt J., Marshall J., Wasan H., Fakih M., Gibbs P., Knuth A., Sangro B., Soulen M.C., Pittari G., Sharma R.A. Safety of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with yttrium-90 microspheres combined with systemic anticancer agents: expert consensus. J. Gastrointes. Oncol. 2017;8:1079–1099. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.09.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Boschi A., Uccelli L., Martini P. A picture of modern 99mTc radiopharmaceuticals: production, chemistry, and applications in molecular imaging. Appl. Sci. 2019;9:2526. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wongso H. Natural product-based radiopharmaceuticals: focus on curcumin and its analogs, flavonoids, and marine peptides. J. Pharm. Anal. 2022;12:380–393. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2021.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dong Z., Zhang L., Zhao D., Wang C., Hao Y., Li Q., Zhang Y., Yang Z., Ni C., Liu Z., Feng L. Procoagulant CaCO3-embedded embolic microspheres can potentiate transcatheter arterial embolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Nano Today. 2024;55 [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Meyer C., Pieper C.C., Ezziddin S., E Wilhelm K., Schild H.H., Ahmadzadehfar H. Feasibility of temporary protective embolization of normal liver tissue using degradable starch microspheres during radioembolization of liver tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:231–237. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2550-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Choi H., Choi B., Yu B., Li W., Matsumoto M.M., Harris K.R., Lewandowski R.J., Larson A.C., Mouli S.K., Kim D. On-demand degradable embolic microspheres for immediate restoration of blood flow during image-guided embolization procedures. Biomaterials. 2021;265 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kim S., Yim S., Chandrasekharan A., Seong K., Lee T.W., Kim B., Kim K., Choi S., Yang S.Y. On-site fabrication of injectable 131I-labeled microgels for local radiotherapy. J. Control. Release. 2020;322:337–345. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.03.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Giannini E.G., Testa R., Savarino V. Liver enzyme alteration: a guide for clinicians. CMAJ (Can. Med. Assoc. J.) 2005;172:367–379. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (1.7MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.


Articles from Materials Today Bio are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES