Abstract
The urgent need for rapidly acting compounds in the development of antimalarial drugs underscores the significance of such compounds in overcoming resistance issues and improving patient adherence to antimalarial treatments. The present study introduces a high-throughput screening (HTS) approach using 1536-well plates, employing Plasmodium falciparum lactate dehydrogenase (PfLDH) combined with nitroreductase (NTR) and fluorescent probes to evaluate inhibition of the growth of the asexual blood stage of malaria parasites. This method was adapted to efficiently assess the speed of action profiling (SAP) in a 384-well plate format, streamlining the traditionally time-consuming screening process. By successfully screening numerous compounds, this approach identified fast-killing hits early in the screening process, addressing challenges associated with artemisinin-based combination therapies. The high-throughput SAP method is expected to be of value in continuously monitoring fast-killing properties during structure–activity relationship studies, expediting the identification and development of novel, rapidly acting antimalarial drugs within phenotypic drug discovery campaigns.
Keywords: malaria, drug discovery, high-throughput screening, lactate dehydrogenase, nitroreductase, fast-killing
Malaria is a parasitic disease caused by Plasmodium spp. infection, and typically is seen in tropical and subtropical areas. In 2022, 608,000 deaths, predominantly among children under 5 years old, were reported worldwide, along with 249 million cases.1 Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) are common treatments for malaria in endemic areas. Unfortunately, artemisinin partial resistance has emerged in Southeast Asia and Africa, highlighting the need for new antimalarial drugs to combat this life-threatening parasitic disease.2−6 In the past decade, the combination of phenotypic screening, and in vitro evolution and whole-genome analysis (IVIEWGA) has played a significant role in antimalarial drug development. This approach has contributed to the identification of several novel drug targets for malaria parasites, facilitating target-based HTS campaigns.7,8 Despite the strong efforts in target-based drug discovery being conducted by the Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) and collaborating researchers, the development of novel antimalarial medicines has often been hampered by the resistance of the malaria parasites to the drug candidates. For example, recrudescent parasites emerged in Phase II clinical trials of both DSM265 and cipargamin that target dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) and the Plasmodium falciparum Na+ pump PfATP4, respectively.9−11 Although target-based drug discovery is an effective method for generating lead compounds, the targets identified by IVIEWGA carry the risk of potential resistance, a major concern in the later stages of drug development. Therefore, there has been renewed interest in phenotypic screening, with several of the resulting candidates now listed in the current drug development pipeline of MMV.
Single-exposure radical cures (SERCs) are highly appealing, since this strategy prevents parasite resistance and simplifies patients’ treatment. However, SERCs characteristically require fast-killing, as seen in next-generation lead compounds such as MMV688533, INE963, ZY19489, and GSK484, the subjects of ongoing clinical trials.12−15 The standard method employed to determine the speed of killing of parasites, the parasite reduction ratio (PRR), was first described in 2012; since then, PRR has been utilized widely to assess the killing properties of candidate compounds.16,17 The conventional PRR assay has a relatively low throughput due to the complexity of the protocol, requiring at least 1 month to yield results. This aspect means that one cannot timely determine whether hit compounds are fast killers during the early stages of drug discovery, including structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies where kill rate may often change along with structural changes of compounds. Although another method based on luminescence is available for assessing the rate of kill (RoK), a transgenic parasite expressing luciferase is required.18,19 Despite the crucial importance of the killing properties of next-generation lead compounds, no scalable assay method for determining the parasite-killing of multiple compounds has been reported to date.
Phenotypic screening of the asexual blood stage (ABS) of malaria parasites often employs the P. falciparum lactate dehydrogenase (PfLDH) assay to quantify parasite growth.20 Specifically, PfLDH (in the lysate of a parasite culture) is coupled to the Clostridium kluyveri diaphorase; the bacterial enzyme catalyzes a redox reaction that converts nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) to nitroblue formazan (NBF) via 3-acetylpyridine adenine dinucleotide (APAD+), a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) analogue that exhibits cofactor specificity for PfLDH. In the past, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) employed the PfLDH assay to screen approximately 2 million compounds in a 384-well plate format.21 However, of late, the SYBR green I-based fluorescence assay, which detects parasite DNA, has become more commonly used for phenotypic HTS of the ABS of malaria parasites. This shift occurred because the fluorescence assay was the only method available for use in the 1536-well format.21,22 Nevertheless, the simple principle of a PfLDH assay that involves a redox enzyme and a detection probe coupled with the LDH reaction, allows for easy tuning of the assay protocol depending on the specific purpose of the experiment.
In the present report, we describe the development of a modified PfLDH assay using the nitroreductase (NTR) encoded by the Escherichia colinfsB gene. NTR, a flavoprotein, uses NAD(P)H as an electron donor to reduce a variety of nitroaromatics.23 To enhance the conventional PfLDH assay’s performance, we incorporated into the assay system “turn-on” fluorescent probes that include a nitrobenzyl moiety24,25 that is reduced by NTR. The use of a near-infrared (NIR) probe with an extended wavelength range (excitation/emission wavelengths (λex/em) = 615/690 nm) compared to hemoglobin absorption (∼600 nm) effectively decreased interference from hemoglobin absorption in the lysate, resulting in an increased signal window. This innovative approach using the NIR probe enabled us to conduct phenotypic screening of the ABS of malaria in a 1536-well format, and improved the assay robustness compared to that of the conventional SYBR green I assay. Moreover, the use of the optimized PfLDH-NTR assay system can substitute the time-consuming protocol of conventional PRR. A feasibility study with representative antimalarial drugs showed results consistent with those obtained using the conventional PRR method. Our high-throughput SAP (HT-SAP) assay therefore is expected to serve as a powerful tool for identifying, in the early stages of drug discovery, novel antimalarial compounds with fast-killing profiles.
Results
Coupling of NTR Reaction with PfLDH
Histidine-tagged NTR expressed in E. coli was purified successfully using conventional nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) agarose purification, yielding a specific activity in the range of 3–5 μmol/min/mg (Figure 1A). The recombinant NTR converted nitrobenzyl-umbelliferone 1 (NCOU1) to umbelliferone, such that the fluorescent signal of the product (λex/em = 315/455 nm) exhibited a time-dependent increase during room temperature incubation (Figure 1B,C). For our assay, PfLDH was coupled with the purified NTR, rather than with the bacterial diaphorase used in the conventional PfLDH assay, and parasite growth was quantified by monitoring the fluorescent signal of umbelliferone (Figure 2A). As anticipated, the NTR quantitatively reduced NCOU1 by using the reducing equivalents from the APADH produced by the PfLDH enzyme present in the parasite lysate. A titration of cultured P. falciparum using the PfLDH-NTR assay demonstrated that the fluorescent signal increased in a parasitemia-dependent manner, with the highest signal intensity seen under the condition of 1% hematocrit (Figures 2B and S1).
Figure 1.
Purification of recombinant nitroreductase (NTR) and quantification of enzymatic activity. (A) Recombinant C-terminally His10-tagged NTR was expressed in E. coli BL21 Star (DE3) and purified using Ni-NTA agarose. In the lanes denoted as Marker, Lysate, Flowthrough, Wash1 and Wash2, a total of 10 μg protein were loaded. For Elution and Concentrated lanes, 2 μg were loaded. The estimated protein size is 26.7 kDa. (B) Scheme of the enzymatic reaction catalyzed by NTR reducing NCOU1 to umbelliferone (λex/em = 315/455 nm). (C) The fluorescent spectra of umbelliferone. Time-dependent increases in the fluorescent spectra were recorded for 60 min at room temperature in NTR assay buffer (30 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 0.25% Triton X-100) containing 5 μg/mL NTR, 20 μM NCOU1, and 50 μM NADH (λex/em = 315/350–600 nm over 0.5 nm intervals, recorded every 5 min). For better visualization, only the spectra from time points at 0, 10, 20, 30, 45, and 60 min are shown (gray: 0 min, orange: 10 min, yellow: 20 min, light blue: 30 min, blue: 45 min, purple: 60 min). Fluorescence intensity (FI) over time (λex/em = 315/455 nm) is plotted in the inset. NCOU1: nitrobenzyl-umbelliferone 1, NAD+: oxidized nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, NADH: reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, a.u.: arbitrary unit.
Figure 2.
Novel assay using nitroreductase (NTR) coupled with P. falciparum lactate dehydrogenase (PfLDH). (A) Scheme of the PfLDH-NTR coupled reaction used for quantification of parasite growth using NCOU1 as the NTR probe. (B) Parasitemia titration measured by the NTR-NCOU1 assay. The umbelliferone signal increased in a parasitemia-dependent manner. Each parasite culture (1% hematocrit (Hct)) was assayed with PfLDH buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM lithium L-lactate, and 0.25% Triton X-100) containing 100 μM APAD+, 100 μM NCOU1, and 0.05–0.1 U/mL NTR at room temperature. (C) Correlation of %Inhibition between conventional diaphorase-NBT and NTR-NCOU1 assays of PfLDH activity. The red line indicates unity (y = x). NCOU1: nitrobenzyl-umbelliferone 1, APAD+: oxidized 3-acetylpyridine adenine dinucleotide, APADH: reduced 3-acetylpyridine adenine dinucleotide, RFU: relative fluorescence units. RBC: red blood cell.
Next, we compared the screening performance, in a 384-well plate format, of the PfLDH-NTR assay compared to the conventional PfLDH-diaphorase assay. Specifically, we used the two assays to assess the growth inhibition of ABS parasites by a test set of 3837 compounds from Shionogi & Co., Ltd., using a compound concentration of 2.5 μM (note that this concentration was selected based on a preliminary 3-dose experiment and expected to retrieve around 1% of hits). A correlation (R2 = 0.387) was observed between the results obtained by the two methods, as depicted in Figure 2C. While the average signal-to-background (S/B) ratio for the NTR method (5.02) was lower than that of the diaphorase method (8.31), the two assays demonstrated similar Z′-factor values (0.71 and 0.76, respectively) (Table 1). Notably, the diaphorase method produced a higher number of hits (261 hits) than the NTR method (123 hits). The PfLDH-diaphorase method may have selected for a larger number of pseudopositive hits, given that this assay’s percent inhibition data did not exhibit a Gaussian distribution and showed the difference among data obtained by other methods (Figures S2–S4). These results indicated that our fluorescence-based PfLDH assay, which incorporates NTR and NCOU1, is more robust than the conventional PfLDH assay using diaphorase.
Table 1. Parameters for Each Assay Methoda.
| CV (%) |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| method | plate format | S/B | negative | positive | Z′ | number of hits | hit rate (%) |
| diaphorase-NBT | 384 | 8.31 | 8.15 | 2.63 | 0.71 | 261 | 6.83 |
| NTR-NCOU1 | 384 | 5.02 | 5.58 | 3.94 | 0.76 | 123 | 3.21 |
| SYBR green | 1536 | 5.89 | 9.63 | 6.22 | 0.61 | 66 | 1.72 |
| NTR-NIR | 1536 | 11.20 | 7.98 | 6.24 | 0.72 | 70 | 1.82 |
NBT: nitroblue tetrazolium, NTR: nitroreductase, NCOU1: nitrobenzyl-umbelliferone 1, NIR: near-infrared, S/B: signal/background ratio, CV: coefficient of variation.
NIR Probe with PfLDH-NTR Assay Improves Screening Robustness
The PfLDH-NTR-NCOU1 assay was not suitable for a 1536-well format due to the low S/B ratio. Consequently, our next objective was to improve this assay method using another probe with a different wavelength of fluorescence emission. Given that the parasite lysate contains a substantial amount of hemoglobin from red blood cells, we conjectured that the absorption of hemoglobin (∼600 nm) interferes with the fluorescent signal of umbelliferone.24 Therefore, we introduced another NIR probe, one that exhibits longer excitation and emission wavelengths after reduction by NTR (Figure 3A). We observed that, following reduction of the NIR probe by NTR in the assay solution, the signal intensity of the reduced species (NIR-Pred), increased in a time-dependent manner, permitting quantification of the malaria parasites (Figure 3B,C). Given the read-time need for measurement of output in the 1536-well format, we quenched the PfLDH reaction by adding a high concentration of pyruvate (0.9 M), resulting in the complete inhibition of NIR-P reduction (Figure 3C). For reactions run in the 1536-well format, the parasite growth inhibition detected by the PfLDH-NTR-NIR assay showed a relatively weak correlation with that obtained by the SYBR green I-based assay (Figure 3D). Notably, the PfLDH-NTR-NIR assay achieved a higher S/B ratio and Z′-factor (11.2 and 0.72, respectively) than those measured by the SYBR green I assay (5.89 and 0.61), indicating that PfLDH-NTR-NIR assay is more robust than the existing method when employed in a 1536-well format.
Figure 3.
Nitroreductase (NTR) assay using near-infrared probe (NIR-P). (A) Scheme of enzymatic reaction of NTR and NIR-Pox producing the fluorescent NIR-Pred (λex/em = 615/670 nm). (B) Time-dependent fluorescent spectra of NIR-Pred produced by NTR. The enzymatic reaction catalyzed by NTR was monitored using 50 μM NIR-Pox and 50 μM NADH in 30 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, buffer containing 0.5 μg/mL NTR. Fluorescent signals (λex/em = 605/620–740 nm over 1 nm intervals) were measured over a 60 min period at room temperature (orange: 0 min, yellow: 2 min, light green: 3 min, blue: 5 min, purple: 10 min, red: 60 min). Fluorescence intensity (FI) over time is plotted in the inset. Note that the reduction of NIR-P by NTR is much faster than the reaction observed using the NCOU1 substrate (Figure. 1C). (C) Parasitemia titration measured using the NTR-NIR assay. Each parasite culture (1% hematocrit (Hct)) was assayed in PfLDH buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH8.0, 300 mM lithium L-lactate, and 0.25% Triton X-100) containing 500 μM APAD+, 200 μM NIR probe, and 0.05 U/mL NTR at room temperature. The quenching (“stop”) solution consisted of 0.9 M pyruvate. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 4). (D) Correlation of %Inhibition between conventional SYBR green and NTR-NIR assays of PfLDH activity. The red line in the graph represents the line of equality (y = x). a.u.: arbitrary unit, NAD+: oxidized nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, NADH: reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, RFU: relative fluorescence units.
High-Throughput SAP (HT-SAP) Assay
In the ABS, LDH oxidizes NADH and provides NAD+ to maintain the flux of anaerobic glycolysis required for the synthesis of ATP, a function that is essential for parasite survival.26,27 We conceived the idea of using PfLDH activity as an indicator of parasite viability and applied the PfLDH-NTR-NCOU1 method in a 384-well format to quantify the speed of action index (SAIn) of test compounds. Mixed-stage (nonsynchronized) parasites at 1.5% parasitemia were incubated at 37 °C for 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h with test compounds at concentrations of 10 μM. Live parasite signals were quantified by the PfLDH-NTR-NCOU1 method and the SAIn values were calculated for each compound. The values then were normalized (as a percentage) to those of dihydroartemisinin (DHA; defined as 100%), a representative fast-killing compound, and ELQ-300 (defined as 0%), an inhibitor of the electron transport chain (ETC) that is classified as a slow-killing compound (Figure S5). At 24 h, fast-killing compounds like ACT-451840, artemether, and cipargamin exhibited SAIn values exceeding 70%; chloroquine, MMV048, and ganaplacide, categorized as moderate-speed-killing compounds, yielded SAIn values in the approximate range of 40–70%. Other known slow-killing ETC inhibitors, DSM265 and atovaquone, yielded lower SAIn values (16.9 and 8.6%, respectively). These results are consistent with the data obtained by the conventional PRR method. The sole exception was DDD107498, a compound known to be a slow-killing inhibitor by conventional PRR,28 show a high SAIn value. Given that this compound is an inhibitor of the eukaryotic translation elongation factor 2 (eEF2);28 we hypothesize that the interruption of protein synthesis by DDD107498 may directly impact PfLDH synthesis, leading to lowered enzymatic activity, which our assay detects as an elevated SAIn. Similar to DDD107498, inhibitors of aminoacyl tRNA synthases (aaRTs) may exihibit similar curve pattern, as they target protein syntheses.29
Subsequently, we sought to optimize the level of parasitemia in the assay by employing our method to assess the effects, on parasites at various densities, of 24- and 48-h exposure to the known inhibitors atovaquone, DHA, and cipargamin (Figure S6). We observed that when the starting parasitemia exceeded 2%, the signal for the vehicle (dimethylsulfoxide; DMSO)-treated parasites achieved a virtual plateau after 48 h of incubation. Therefore, we fixed the starting parasitemia at 1.5% for further experiments.
Having completed the optimization, we conducted HT-SAP assays in an 8-point concentration–response experiment with the alteration of negative controls to DMSO. The concentration–response SAP experiment was implemented because, during the test run, we observed that the shape of SAP concentration curves differed among the compounds (Figure S7). The experiment assessed SAIn at intervals of 0, 24, 48, and 72 h; and determined the 50% effective concentration to reduce the SAIn values (SAIn50) of the representative test compounds, in addition to the 72-h cultures for standard growth inhibition (EC50) assays (Figure 4A). A comparison of the inhibition curves revealed that Hill slopes and plateau levels of the SAP curves varied among compounds and time points (Figure 4B). To quantify the shape of the concentration–response curve and utilize these data as an indicator of SAP, we calculated for each compound the ratio of area under the curve (AUC) between the growth inhibition curve and the SAP curve, yielding a parameter that we refer to as the “AUC%” (Table 2 and Figure 4C). Table 2 exhibits AUC% of 24, 48, and 72 h of each test compound in addition to SAIn50s and EC50s of growth inhibition. We observed that the AUC% values of the fast-killing compounds exceeded 90%. In contrast, the slow-killing compound exhibited lower AUC% values (of approximately 60%); furthermore, the SAIn values of slow-killing compounds did not reach 100%, even at the highest tested concentration (10 μM). These data suggested that robust AUC% values, calculated using multiple data points, permitted effective classification of compounds according to their killing-rate properties. A stepwise increase in maximum effect of SAP curves over time was observed for the erythrocyte invasion inhibitor cytochalasin D, due to the use of asynchronized culture for HT-SAP experiment (Figure 4C). Other than DDD107498, we observed that pyrimethamine, which exhibited a lower AUC% than ETC inhibitors at 24 and 48 h, demonstrated inconsistent behavior with the results of the conventional PRR, where it displayed a moderate rate of kill. A previous study using the hypoxanthine uptake assay clearly demonstrated that pyrimethamine was not effective for the ring stage even at high concentrations (100 × EC50).30 In contrast, atovaquone, which showed the highest activity during the late trophozoite stage in another assay, had more than 70% activity against rings with 24 h of high concentration incubation.31 The lower activity in the HT-SAP assay than ETC inhibitors may reflect this strict stage specificity of pyrimethamine.
Figure 4.
Schematic representation of high-throughput speed of action profiling (HT-SAP) and assessment of well-characterized antimalarial agents. (A) To evaluate the speed of action index (SAIn) by established HT-SAP methods, nonsynchronized 3D7 parasites (hematocrit (Hct) 1%, parasitemia 1.5%) were plate-cultured for 0, 24, 48, and 72 h in the presence of compound. For the growth inhibition assay, 3D7 parasites were synchronized by exposure to 5% sorbitol; ring stage parasites then were plate-cultured for 72 h in the presence of compound. Growth was terminated at the indicated time point by freezing (at −30 °C) the respective assay plates; the number of live parasites then was quantified via an LDH assay using retororeductase (NTR) and nitrobenzyl-umbelliferone 1 (NCOU1). For the growth inhibition assay, the positive control consisted of a mixture of 1 μM atovaquone and artemisinin; the negative control consisted of 0.4% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). For the HT-SAP assay, the positive and negative controls consisted of 1 μM dihydroartemisinin (DHA) and 0.4% DMSO, respectively. (B) Examples of two types of SAP curves shown in red. The reduction of maximum SAIn and SAIn50 shift were observed in comparison with growth inhibition curves (LDH assay, in blue). (C) Concentration–response curves of Inhibition (%) and SAIn (%) by test compounds were generated for each assay condition by three independent replicates (each in duplicate; n = 2) except for test compounds for the preliminary experiment, ELQ-300 and cytochalasin D in a replicate (n = 2). Because some compounds exhibited slower SAP than ELQ-300, the slowest control (0%) was replaced with the rate obtained for DMSO.
Table 2. Activity and AUC% of Test Compoundsa,b.
| SAIn50 (nM) |
AUC% |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| compound | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | EC50 (nM) | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h |
| ACT-451840 | 6.67 ± 2.85 | 5.40 ± 2.00 | 5.26 ± 1.03 | 3.42 ± 1.06 | 85.96 ± 2.61 | 92.75 ± 4.17 | 93.02 ± 3.36 |
| artemether | 14.37 ± 1.52 | 14.22 ± 1.63 | 22.61 ± 9.01 | 7.06 ± 0.55 | 88.35 ± 1.22 | 90.38 ± 4.86 | 84.29 ± 5.51 |
| DHA | 2.95 ± 0.31 | 3.06 ± 0.78 | 6.61 ± 3.75 | 2.16 ± 0.08 | 95.41 ± 0.75 | 96.52 ± 3.45 | 89.08 ± 6.04 |
| cipargamin | 2.55 ± 0.68 | 1.84 ± 0.52 | 1.48 ± 0.24 | 1.44 ± 0.11 | 86.54 ± 1.76 | 95.91 ± 3.86 | 99.59 ± 2.10 |
| DDD107498 | 2.57 ± 0.25 | 2.54 ± 0.44 | 2.94 ± 0.57 | 0.96 ± 0.14 | 79.10 ± 2.28 | 86.26 ± 2.81 | 87.49 ± 2.16 |
| chloroquine | 81.31 ± 46.21 | 67.98 ± 40.67 | 76.86 ± 47.69 | 34.83 ± 21.52 | 81.70 ± 2.06 | 88.01 ± 3.81 | 88.11 ± 2.61 |
| ganaplacide | 125.96 ± 16.70 | 27.25 ± 4.48 | 15.72 ± 1.79 | 9.24 ± 1.59 | 52.73 ± 1.99 | 75.33 ± 4.36 | 85.81 ± 4.56 |
| lumefantrine | 49.39 ± 17.78 | 32.75 ± 14.78 | 32.54 ± 14.49 | 15.15 ± 5.66 | 68.20 ± 1.05 | 72.20 ± 9.38 | 75.63 ± 8.66 |
| mefloquine | 59.79 ± 10.43 | 63.24 ± 13.96 | 59.21 ± 9.06 | 20.26 ± 5.54 | 76.54 ± 1.55 | 71.41 ± 7.44 | 74.99 ± 4.35 |
| MMV048 | 249.61 ± 30.19 | 130.63 ± 58.50 | 31.77 ± 4.24 | 19.03 ± 3.47 | 59.75 ± 2.91 | 75.23 ± 6.89 | 88.83 ± 2.12 |
| atovaquone | 58.06 ± 48.87 | 8.09 ± 4.99 | 9.23 ± 8.27 | 0.75 ± 0.14 | 51.70 ± 2.95 | 61.71 ± 7.69 | 65.37 ± 13.40 |
| DSM265 | 538.70 ± 474.07 | 96.92 ± 82.19 | 120.99 ± 151.63 | 6.40 ± 0.42 | 48.64 ± 2.71 | 59.84 ± 5.79 | 65.72 ± 11.12 |
| pyrimethamine | >10000 ± 0.00 | >10000 ± 0.00 | 46.09 ± 2.17 | 30.09 ± 0.64 | N/A | N/A | 65.67 ± 3.32 |
| ELQ-300* | >10,000 | 139.32 | 298.50 | 24.77 | N/A | 56.93 | 48.52 |
| cytochalasin D* | >10,000 | 15.88 | 24.13 | 20.54 | N/A | 65.33 | 86.77 |
SAIn50 indicates concentrations of the compounds required to reduce the SAIn values to 50%. EC50 indicates effective concentrations to reduce the parasite growth to 50%. All values are displayed as mean ± SD (triplicate, n = 2). *Data of test compounds for the preliminary experiment, ELQ-300 and cytochalasin D are displayed as mean (n = 2). N/A: AUC% of the data for which SAIn50 has not been determined cannot be accurately calculated.
AUC: area under the curve; DHA: dihydroartemisinin.
Discussion
In the present work, we established a novel PfLDH-based assay method for detecting antimalarial candidates targeting the ABS using NTR and “turn-on” fluorescent probes with a nitrobenzyl moiety. The new method provides an assay with robustness superior to existing screening methods, and we successfully conducted HTS with a small library containing a subset of 3837 structurally diverse compounds selected from the main library of Shionogi & Co., Ltd., in a 1536-well format. Our method was also able to assess the parasite survival rate, as assessed by PfLDH activity. The PfLDH-NTR assay permits quantification of the SAIn for many compounds in a 384-well format, significantly decreasing experimental time. The SAP classification of known antimalarial drugs by our HT-SAP method was consistent with the data obtained by conventional assays. Moreover, HT-SAP permitted the determination of the concentration-dependency of a compound’s SAP, yielding a new parameter (the AUC%) indicating the speed of action. Our novel PfLDH-NTR-based assay is expected to be valuable for determining the SAIn values of many hit compounds in the early stages of drug discovery, facilitating the development of next-generation fast-killing antimalarial drugs.
In the field of cancer research, NTR is widely used for the in vivo detection of tumor cells and the activation of prodrugs, reflecting the fact that NTR expression is specifically increased in tumor cells growing under hypoxic conditions.32−34 Additionally, NTR plays a crucial role in the treatment of Chagas disease, a condition caused by Trypanosoma cruzi infection; benznidazole and nifurtimox, front-line drugs used against Chagas, are activated by NTR activity. Resistance to these drugs is determined primarily by loss of function mutations in the T. cruzi NTR-encoding gene (including homozygous nonsense mutations and the loss of one copy) that lead to decreased levels of the trypanosomal enzyme.35,36 Given NTR’s biological significance and diverse applications in biomedical research, we envisioned using NTR to establish innovative assays for the discovery of antimalarial drugs. Moreover, the tissue transparency of the λex/em of NIR, which fall within the bio-optical window (650–1100 nm), makes these wavelengths useful in biomedical research, especially for in vivo imaging, due to lower hemoglobin absorption.37 This property of the NIR probe fluorophore mitigates interference from the abundant hemoglobin in red blood cells, greatly enhancing the signal strength of the PfLDH assay. Through the introduction of a coupling enzyme and probes, we improved the performance of the conventional PfLDH assay for detecting growth inhibition of the malaria parasite at the ABS. In the future, it will be interesting to introduce modifications to existing assay systems, thereby enhancing robustness and reducing cost. This initiative has the potential to pave the way for the creation of advanced HTS systems applicable to other infectious diseases, including Trypanosoma spp. and Mycobacteria spp.; indeed, revisions to facilitate screens for these systems are currently in progress.
For HTS of the ABS of the malaria parasite in a 1536-well format, the commonly used assay employs SYBR green I, a fluorescent dye with excitation and emission wavelengths of 485 and 528 nm, respectively. Our PfLDH-NTR assay with NIRox would be (to our knowledge) the first system using NIR wavelengths to screen for antimalarial compounds. A noteworthy finding is that a small number of hit compounds of the SYBR green I-based assay was not common with that of the PfLDH-NTR with NIRox assay (Figure S4). The optical properties of small organic compounds in chemical libraries may impact the readout signal, resulting in false-positives and -negatives.38,39 Indeed, a small number of compounds showed inhibition levels below −40% as assessed by the SYBR green I-based assay, possibly reflecting the optical properties of these compounds (Figure S2). More recently, an alternative method based on the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect P. falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 was reported.40 The PfLDH-NTR with NIRox assay may serve as a viable alternative screening method to prevent the loss of promising compounds as pseudonegatives in future phenotypic HTS of the malaria parasite at the ABS.
To enhance the throughput in assessing SAP, we developed the PfLDH-NTR assay system, enabling the HTS evaluation of antimalarial compounds based on SAIn values. Notably, we observed that the concentration-dependent SAPs of fast-killing compounds typically demonstrate curves that resembled the growth inhibition curve of the same chemicals. However, disparities between these two types of curves are more pronounced for moderate- and slow-killing compounds. To quantify these differences, and to classify multiple test compounds according to the SAIn value, we defined the AUC%. This parameter provides a succinct description of the parasite-killing rate of test compounds and is expected to accelerate SAR studies, particularly for fast-killing compounds. At the same time, we note that a limitation of HT-SAP is that SAIn values for compounds targeting protein synthesis (e.g., DDD107498) and perhaps PfLDH inhibitor may be overestimated due to the dependence of the assay on PfLDH activity. However, this limitation can be addressed by cross-referencing results with conventional PRR or classical Giemsa staining at later stages of drug discovery.
Conclusions
We developed, in-house, NTR-based methods for the identification of compounds with activity against the ABS of malaria parasites, and successfully implemented one such assay for HTS in a 1536-well format. The use of the PfLDH-NTR method for SAIn determination represents a novel assay of the parasite-killing rate of drug candidates, named as HT-SAP. While HT-SAP may have some pseudopositives due to its enzyme-based methodology, it provides significant advantages in terms of speed, cost, and time and is applicable for selecting fast-killing compounds in HTS and SAR studies. Combining conventional PRR with our scalable HT-SAP, our research paves the way for the discovery of next-generation antimalarial drugs that may find use in combatting drug resistance in malaria-endemic areas.
Methods
Preparation of Recombinant Enzymes
Prior to assay development, we prepared two coupling enzymes, Clostridium kluyveri diaphorase and E. coli NAD(P)H nitroreductase NfsB (NTR), as previously described.23,41 Briefly, codon-optimized genes were synthesized to encode proteins with N-terminal His10-SUMO tags and C-terminal His10 tags. These genes with C-terminal His10 were cloned separately into the pET101-D-TOPO expression vector (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the resulting plasmids were transformed into E. coli BL21 Star (DE3) cells according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The resulting E. coli strains were precultured (overnight at 37 °C with shaking at 200 rpm) in Luria–Bertani medium supplemented with 100 μg/mL carbenicillin. The resulting cultures were used as inocula for 600 mL volumes of Terrific-Broth medium supplemented with 100 μg/mL carbenicillin and 0.4% glycerol, and the resulting cultures were incubated at 37 °C with shaking at 200 rpm. When the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) reached 0.4 to 0.6, protein expression was induced by adding 50 μM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG; Sigma) and 1 μg/mL riboflavin (Sigma). After incubation for 16 h at 20 °C, the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 7000g for 10 min at 4 °C and resuspended at a density of 0.4 g cell pellet/mL in cold lysis buffer (50 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 0.25 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF)). The suspended cells were lysed using a French press (Ohtake) at 180 MPa, and the supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 40,000g for 30 min at 4 °C. The His-tagged proteins were purified using Ni-NTA (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s protocol and eluted using a lysis buffer containing 200 mM imidazole. The eluate was concentrated using an Amicon Ultra Centrifugal Filter 10 kDa Molecular Weight Cut-off (Merck) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and the resulting purified enzyme was mixed with an equal volume of cold glycerol and stored frozen at −30 °C. The protein concentrations in the final enzyme stocks were determined by the Bradford assay using a Bio-Rad kit, and the specific activities of the enzymes were quantified by measuring the reduction of 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol (DCIP; Sigma) using a UV760 spectrophotometer (Jasco). To confirm the purity of the enzymes, proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoreses (SDS–PAGE) and stained using GelCode Blue Safe Protein Stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The specific activities of diaphorase and NTR were typically in the range of 100–150 and 3–5 μmol/min/mg, respectively.
Quantification of the Reduction of Fluorescent Probes by NTR
To test whether the purified NTR was capable of reducing fluorescent probes, we initially measured NTR activity prior to using the enzyme for parasite quantification. Using a cuvette, 20 μM NCOU1 (Enamine) was combined with a mixture containing 5 μg/mL NTR, 50 μM NADH, and 0.25% Triton X-100 in 30 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), and the fluorescence of the umbelliferone (λex/em = 315/455 nm) generated by the reaction was measured. In addition, we synthesized the NIRox probe according to the previously described route.41 For the NIR reaction, 50 μM NIR-Pox was combined with a mixture containing 0.5 μg/mL NTR and 50 μM NADH in 30 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), and the fluorescence of NIR-Pred (λex/em = 615/670 nm) was measured. The fluorescence kinetics of both reduced probes were monitored using a FP-6300 spectrofluorometer (Jasco).
Parasite Cultures
P. falciparum 3D7 parasites were maintained in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 25 mg/L gentamicin, 50 mg/L hypoxanthine, 23.8 mM sodium bicarbonate, and 0.5% (w/v) Albumax II (Gibco). The culture was maintained at 2% hematocrit using O+ human erythrocytes obtained from The Japanese Red Cross Society. As per established protocols,42,43 the incubation temperature was set at 37 °C and the environment consisted of mixed gas (5% O2, 5% CO2, 90% N2). Parasitemia was determined using either Giemsa staining or an XN-30 automated hematology analyzer (Sysmex).44 For plate assays, ring-stage synchronized parasites were prepared using sorbitol treatment.45 In the growth inhibition assay, the compound solvent DMSO and a mixture of 1 μM artemisinin/atovaquone served as negative and positive controls, respectively.
Diaphorase-NBT and NTR-NCOU1 Assay in 384-Well Plates
Test compounds were predispensed at a volume of 100 nL/well into 384-well plates. For the diaphorase-NBT assay, ring-stage parasites at 0.3% parasitemia and 2% hematocrit were dispensed into 384-well clear plates (Corning); for the NTR-NCOU1 assay, ring-stage parasites at 0.3% parasitemia and 1% hematocrit were dispensed into 384-well black plates (Greiner). Parasites were then dispensed at 25 μL/well into the compound-containing plates using a Multidrop Combi with a small metal cassette (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The parasite cultures in the assay plates then were incubated in a moist chamber filled with mixed gas for 72 h and subsequently frozen overnight (or longer) at −30 °C. The resulting frozen plates were thawed at room temperature for at least 2 h before the assay was performed. For the diaphorase-NBT assay, the reaction mix was prepared in modified PfLDH buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM lithium l-lactate, and 0.25% Triton X-100) supplemented with 75 μM APAD+, 0.2 mg/mL NBT, and 1 U/mL diaphorase (one unit was defined as the amount of enzyme required to reduce 1 μmol of APADH per minute). For this assay, the reaction mixture was dispensed into the assay plates at 70 μL/well, and the plates were then incubated at room temperature with agitation at 650 rpm for 20 min. On the other hand, the reaction mixture for the NTR-NCOU1 assay consisted of modified PfLDH buffer supplemented with 100 μM APAD+, 100 μM NCOU1, 0.05 U/mL NTR, and 0.015% (v/v) KM-70 defoaming agent (Shin-Etsu). For this assay, the reaction mix was dispensed into the assay plates at 35 μL/well, and the plates were then incubated under the same condition as those used for the diaphorase-NBT assay. The absorption of nitro blue formazan (650 nm; for the diaphorase-NBT assay) or the fluorescence of umbelliferone (λex/em = 360/465 nm; for the NTR-NCOU1 assay) was measured using a SpectraMax Paradigm spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, Inc.). The compound solvent DMSO and a mixture of 1 μM artemisinin/atovaquone served as negative and positive controls, respectively.
NTR-NIRox Assay in 1536-Well Plates
For the HTS in 1536-well format, ring-stage parasites at 0.3% parasitemia and 1% hematocrit were dispensed at 4 μL/well into 1536-well black plates (Greiner) containing 20 nL/well of test compounds. Parasite-dispensed assay plates were maintained under the same conditions as described above for the 384-well plate assays. The NIRox probe was initially suspended at 1 mM in 90% acetonitrile. The reaction mixture for the NTR-NIRox assay was prepared by supplementing modified PfLDH buffer with 500 μM APAD+, 200 μM NIRox probe, and 0.05 U/mL NTR. For this assay, the reaction mixture was dispensed into the assay plates at 3 μL/well, and the contents of each well were mixed at 1200 rpm. The plates were then incubated at room temperature for 3 min. The enzymatic reactions were quenched by dispensing the “stop” mixture (0.9 M sodium pyruvate containing 0.015% KM-70) at 3 μL/well, and the assay plates were then centrifuged at 90g for 1 min at room temperature. The centrifuged plates were incubated for 1 h at room temperature in a moist chamber, at which point the NIRred signal (λex/em = 615/690 nm) was measured using a PHERAstar Plus microplate reader (BMG LABTECH). The compound solvent DMSO and a mixture of 1 μM artemisinin/atovaquone served as negative and positive controls, respectively.
SYBR Green Assay in 1536-Well Plates
For the SYBR green assay, ring-stage parasites at 0.3% parasitemia and 3% hematocrit were dispensed at 4 μL/well into 1536-well black plates (Greiner) containing 20 nL/well of test compounds. Parasite-dispensed assay plates were maintained under the same conditions as described above for the 384-well plate assays. The reaction mixture for the SYBR green I assay consisted of lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 5 mM EDTA, and 0.1% Triton X-100) supplemented with 0.02% SYBR green I and 0.015% KM-70. This reaction mixture was dispensed into the assay plates at 4 μL/well, and the contents of each well were mixed at 1200 rpm. The plates then were incubated at room temperature for 1 h. The fluorescence of SYBR green I (λex/em = 485/528 nm) was measured using a SpectraMax Paradigm spectrophotometer. The compound solvent DMSO and a mixture of 1 μM artemisinin/atovaquone served as negative and positive controls, respectively.
Data Analysis
Hits of a test set of compounds were chosen by activity criteria [>3 standard deviation (SD) cutoff of DMSO controls] that were calculated using Spotfire software (version 11.4.3; TIBCO). Z′ was calculated as 1 – (3 × SD100% + 3 × SD0%)/(Mean100% – Mean0%). The correlations of %Inhibition and histograms were visualized with R (version 4.0.2). The inhibition curves and EC50 values were determined using GraphPad Prism (version 8.4.3. GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, California) and Spotfire. Data visualization for the other figures was performed using GraphPad Prism. The area under the curve (AUC) for both the HT-SAP assay and growth inhibition assay in the 384-well plates was calculated using Spotfire software, and the AUC% was calculated as 100 × [(AUC of HT-SAP assay)/(AUC of growth inhibition assay)]. Venny (version 2.1) was used to make a Venn diagram (https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html).
HT-SAP Assay in 384-Well Plates
Test compounds were predispensed at 100 nL/well in 384-well plates, and replicate plates were prepared. Nonsynchronized parasites at 1% hematocrit and 1.5% parasitemia, which were typically composed of 1.2% ring, 0.2% trophozoite, and 0.1% schizont were dispensed into five 384-well black compound-containing plates at 25 μL/well using a Multidrop Combi with a small metal cassette. One of the plates was frozen at −30 °C right immediately following dispensing of parasites (control plate; 0 h), while the other plates were incubated in a moist chamber filled with mixed gas for 24, 48, 72, or 96 h; at the indicated time points, growth was terminated by freezing overnight (or longer) at −30 °C (SAP plates). Additional plates for the generation of the growth inhibition curve were prepared and subjected to the NTR-NCOU1 assay using the procedure described in the previous section, with a 72-h incubation period. The fluorescence of umbelliferone (λex/em = 360/465 nm) was measured using a PHERAstar microplate reader, and the relative LDH activity was calculated by dividing the fluorescence of the SAP plates by that of the respective control plate. The SAIn value of each concentration was calculated by normalizing the primary values to the LDH activity obtained in the negative and positive control reactions (compound solvent DMSO and 1 μM dihydroartemisinin, respectively). In addition, the concentration of each compound to reduce the SAIn value to 50% (SAIn50) was calculated in each time point. Unless specifically mentioned, we used data at 48 h as an indicator because SAIn (%) reached a plateau at 72 h (Figure S6).
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Japanese Red Cross Society for providing human red blood cells (RBCs; Registry No. R030038) and Dr. Kenji Takaya (Laboratory for Medicinal Chemistry Research, Shionogi & Co., Ltd.) for synthesizing the NIR probe. TOC and Figure 4A were created with BioRender.com.
Glossary
Abbreviations Used
- PfLDH
Plasmodium falciparum lactate dehydrogenase
- NTR
nitroreductase
- PRR
parasite reduction ratio
- SAP
speed of action profiling
- SAIn
speed of action index
- ACTs
artemisinin-based combination therapies
- IVIEWGA
in vitro evolution and whole-genome analysis
- MMV
Medicines for Malaria Venture
- DHODH
dihydroorotate dehydrogenase
- SERCs
single-exposure radical cures
- ABS
asexual blood stage
- NBT
nitroblue tetrazolium
- NBF
nitroblue formazan
- APAD+
3-acetyl pyridine adenine dinucleotide
- NIR
near-infrared
- NCOU1
nitrobenzyl-umbelliferone 1
- ETC
electron transport chain
- DHA
dihydroartemisinin
- eEF2
eukaryotic translation elongation factor 2
- PMSF
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride
- DCIP
2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsinfecdis.4c00328.
Comparison of fluorescent signals of NTR-NCOU1 assay with different hematocrit condition; histogram of %Inhibition of the test compounds, correlation of %Inhibition among each assay method; Venn diagram of the hit compounds; SAIn (%) of test compounds for 24, 48, 72, and 96 h; speed of action of representative fast-killing compounds (DHA and cipargamin) and a slow-killing compound; atovaquone; concentration–response curve of SAP of test compound (PDF)
Author Contributions
○ T.S. and R.I. contributed equally to this work. D.K.I., T.K., and K.K. directed the work. T.S., R.I., and E.Y. performed the experiments. T.S., R.I., and E.Y. analyzed the data. T.S., R.I., E.Y., and D.K.I. wrote the paper. All authors directly participated in this work, including preparation of the manuscript and approval of the final version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This work was supported, in part, by the following funding sources: grants for Infectious Disease Control from the Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development (SATREPS; No. JP10000284 to K.K., and No. JP14425718 to D.K.I. and T.S.); grants from the Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED); Grants-in-aid for Scientific Research (A) (No. 20H00620 to D.K.I.), (B) (23H02711 to K.K. and D.K.I.), and (C) (No. 22K07045 to T.S.); a grant from The Leading Initiative for Excellent Young Researchers (LEADER; No. JP16811362 to D.K.I.) from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Culture, Sports and Technology (MEXT); and by Grants-in-aid for Research on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases from the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (Nos. 21fk0108138 and 23fk0108680 to D.K.I.). This work also was supported by Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): RI and TK are employees of Shionogi & Co., Ltd..
Notes
Nagasaki University and Shionogi & Co., Ltd., launched the Shionogi Global Infectious Division (SHINE) at the Institute of Tropical Medicine NEKKEN, Nagasaki University. Under the collaboration agreement, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. provided the NIR-P reagent and compounds predispensed into the 384- and 1536-well plates for validation of HTS, and contributed to discussions with the authors. Shionogi & Co., Ltd. did not influence the experimental design, data collection, data analysis, or interpretation.
Supplementary Material
References
- World Malaria Report; World Health Organization: Genève, Switzerland, 2023.
- Ariey F.; Witkowski B.; Amaratunga C.; Beghain J.; Langlois A.-C.; Khim N.; Kim S.; Duru V.; Bouchier C.; Ma L.; Lim P.; Leang R.; Duong S.; Sreng S.; Suon S.; Chuor C. M.; Bout D. M.; Ménard S.; Rogers W. O.; Genton B.; Fandeur T.; Miotto O.; Ringwald P.; Le Bras J.; Berry A.; Barale J.-C.; Fairhurst R. M.; Benoit-Vical F.; Mercereau-Puijalon O.; Ménard D. A Molecular Marker of Artemisinin-Resistant Plasmodium falciparum Malaria. Nature 2014, 505 (7481), 50–55. 10.1038/nature12876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mbengue A.; Bhattacharjee S.; Pandharkar T.; Liu H.; Estiu G.; Stahelin R. V.; Rizk S. S.; Njimoh D. L.; Ryan Y.; Chotivanich K.; Nguon C.; Ghorbal M.; Lopez-Rubio J.-J.; Pfrender M.; Emrich S.; Mohandas N.; Dondorp A. M.; Wiest O.; Haldar K. A Molecular Mechanism of Artemisinin Resistance in Plasmodium falciparum Malaria. Nature 2015, 520 (7549), 683–687. 10.1038/nature14412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Balikagala B.; Fukuda N.; Ikeda M.; Katuro O. T.; Tachibana S.-I.; Yamauchi M.; Opio W.; Emoto S.; Anywar D. A.; Kimura E.; Palacpac N. M. Q.; Odongo-Aginya E. I.; Ogwang M.; Horii T.; Mita T. Evidence of Artemisinin-Resistant Malaria in Africa. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385 (13), 1163–1171. 10.1056/NEJMoa2101746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Conrad M. D.; Asua V.; Garg S.; Giesbrecht D.; Niaré K.; Smith S.; Namuganga J. F.; Katairo T.; Legac J.; Crudale R. M.; Tumwebaze P. K.; Nsobya S. L.; Cooper R. A.; Kamya M. R.; Dorsey G.; Bailey J. A.; Rosenthal P. J. Evolution of Partial Resistance to Artemisinins in Malaria Parasites in Uganda. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023, 389 (8), 722–732. 10.1056/NEJMoa2211803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosenthal P. J.; Asua V.; Conrad M. D. Emergence, Transmission Dynamics and Mechanisms of Artemisinin Partial Resistance in Malaria Parasites in Africa. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2024, 22 (6), 373–384. 10.1038/s41579-024-01008-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cowell A. N.; Istvan E. S.; Lukens A. K.; Gomez-Lorenzo M. G.; Vanaerschot M.; Sakata-Kato T.; Flannery E. L.; Magistrado P.; Owen E.; Abraham M.; LaMonte G.; Painter H. J.; Williams R. M.; Franco V.; Linares M.; Arriaga I.; Bopp S.; Corey V. C.; Gnädig N. F.; Coburn-Flynn O.; Reimer C.; Gupta P.; Murithi J. M.; Moura P. A.; Fuchs O.; Sasaki E.; Kim S. W.; Teng C. H.; Wang L. T.; Akidil A.; Adjalley S.; Willis P. A.; Siegel D.; Tanaseichuk O.; Zhong Y.; Zhou Y.; Llinás M.; Ottilie S.; Gamo F.-J.; Lee M. C. S.; Goldberg D. E.; Fidock D. A.; Wirth D. F.; Winzeler E. A. Mapping the Malaria Parasite Druggable Genome by Using In Vitro Evolution and Chemogenomics. Science 2018, 359 (6372), 191–199. 10.1126/science.aan4472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siqueira-Neto J. L.; Wicht K. J.; Chibale K.; Burrows J. N.; Fidock D. A.; Winzeler E. A. Antimalarial Drug Discovery: Progress and Approaches. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2023, 22 (10), 807–826. 10.1038/s41573-023-00772-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Llanos-Cuentas A.; Casapia M.; Chuquiyauri R.; Hinojosa J.-C.; Kerr N.; Rosario M.; Toovey S.; Arch R. H.; Phillips M. A.; Rozenberg F. D.; Bath J.; Ng C. L.; Cowell A. N.; Winzeler E. A.; Fidock D. A.; Baker M.; Möhrle J. J.; Hooft van Huijsduijnen R.; Gobeau N.; Araeipour N.; Andenmatten N.; Rückle T.; Duparc S. Antimalarial Activity of Single-Dose DSM265, a Novel Plasmodium Dihydroorotate Dehydrogenase Inhibitor, in Patients with Uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum or Plasmodium vivax Malaria Infection: A Proof-of-Concept, Open-Label, Phase 2a Study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18 (8), 874–883. 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30309-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmitt E. K.; Ndayisaba G.; Yeka A.; Asante K. P.; Grobusch M. P.; Karita E.; Mugerwa H.; Asiimwe S.; Oduro A.; Fofana B.; Doumbia S.; Su G.; Csermak Renner K.; Venishetty V. K.; Sayyed S.; Straimer J.; Demin I.; Barsainya S.; Boulton C.; Gandhi P. Efficacy of Cipargamin (KAE609) in a Randomized, Phase II Dose-Escalation Study in Adults in Sub-Saharan Africa with Uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum Malaria. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022, 74 (10), 1831–1839. 10.1093/cid/ciab716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang T.; Ottilie S.; Istvan E. S.; Godinez-Macias K. P.; Lukens A. K.; Baragaña B.; Campo B.; Walpole C.; Niles J. C.; Chibale K.; Dechering K. J.; Llinás M.; Lee M. C. S.; Kato N.; Wyllie S.; McNamara C. W.; Gamo F. J.; Burrows J.; Fidock D. A.; Goldberg D. E.; Gilbert I. H.; Wirth D. F.; Winzeler E. A.; MalDA, Accelerating Malaria Drug Discovery. Trends Parasitol. 2021, 37 (6), 493–507. 10.1016/j.pt.2021.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murithi J. M.; Pascal C.; Bath J.; Boulenc X.; Gnädig N. F.; Pasaje C. F. A.; Rubiano K.; Yeo T.; Mok S.; Klieber S.; Desert P.; Jiménez-Díaz M. B.; Marfurt J.; Rouillier M.; Cherkaoui-Rbati M. H.; Gobeau N.; Wittlin S.; Uhlemann A.-C.; Price R. N.; Wirjanata G.; Noviyanti R.; Tumwebaze P.; Cooper R. A.; Rosenthal P. J.; Sanz L. M.; Gamo F. J.; Joseph J.; Singh S.; Bashyam S.; Augereau J. M.; Giraud E.; Bozec T.; Vermat T.; Tuffal G.; Guillon J.-M.; Menegotto J.; Sallé L.; Louit G.; Cabanis M.-J.; Nicolas M. F.; Doubovetzky M.; Merino R.; Bessila N.; Angulo-Barturen I.; Baud D.; Bebrevska L.; Escudié F.; Niles J. C.; Blasco B.; Campbell S.; Courtemanche G.; Fraisse L.; Pellet A.; Fidock D. A.; Leroy D. The Antimalarial MMV688533 Provides Potential for Single-Dose Cures with a High Barrier to Plasmodium falciparum Parasite Resistance. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021, 13 (603), eabg6013 10.1126/scitranslmed.abg6013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taft B. R.; Yokokawa F.; Kirrane T.; Mata A.-C.; Huang R.; Blaquiere N.; Waldron G.; Zou B.; Simon O.; Vankadara S.; Chan W. L.; Ding M.; Sim S.; Straimer J.; Guiguemde A.; Lakshminarayana S. B.; Jain J. P.; Bodenreider C.; Thompson C.; Lanshoeft C.; Shu W.; Fang E.; Qumber J.; Chan K.; Pei L.; Chen Y.-L.; Schulz H.; Lim J.; Abas S. N.; Ang X.; Liu Y.; Angulo-Barturen I.; Jiménez-Díaz M. B.; Gamo F. J.; Crespo-Fernandez B.; Rosenthal P. J.; Cooper R. A.; Tumwebaze P.; Aguiar A. C. C.; Campo B.; Campbell S.; Wagner J.; Diagana T. T.; Sarko C. Discovery and Preclinical Pharmacology of INE963, a Potent and Fast-Acting Blood-Stage Antimalarial with a High Barrier to Resistance and Potential for Single-Dose Cures in Uncomplicated Malaria. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65 (5), 3798–3813. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barber B. E.; Fernandez M.; Patel H. B.; Barcelo C.; Woolley S. D.; Patel H.; Llewellyn S.; Abd-Rahman A. N.; Sharma S.; Jain M.; Ghoghari A.; Di Resta I.; Fuchs A.; Deni I.; Yeo T.; Mok S.; Fidock D. A.; Chalon S.; Möhrle J. J.; Parmar D.; McCarthy J. S.; Kansagra K. Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Antimalarial Activity of the Novel Triaminopyrimidine ZY-19489: A First-in-Human, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Single Ascending Dose Study, Pilot Food-Effect Study, and Volunteer Infection Study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22 (6), 879–890. 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00679-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gomes P.; Guido R. V. C. Editorial: Antimalarial Chemotherapy in the XXIst Century, Volume II. Front. Pharmacol. 2023, 14, 1229764 10.3389/fphar.2023.1229764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanz L. M.; Crespo B.; De-Cózar C.; Ding X. C.; Llergo J. L.; Burrows J. N.; García-Bustos J. F.; Gamo F.-J. P. falciparum In Vitro Killing Rates Allow to Discriminate Between Different Antimalarial Mode-of-Action. PLoS One 2012, 7 (2), e30949 10.1371/journal.pone.0030949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walz A.; Duffey M.; Aljayyoussi G.; Sax S.; Leroy D.; Besson D.; Burrows J. N.; Cherkaoui-Rbati M. H.; Gobeau N.; Westwood M.-A.; Siethoff C.; Gamo F.-J.; Mäser P.; Wittlin S. The Parasite Reduction Ratio (PRR) Assay Version 2: Standardized Assessment of Plasmodium falciparum Viability after Antimalarial Treatment In Vitro. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16 (2), 163 10.3390/ph16020163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ullah I.; Sharma R.; Biagini G. A.; Horrocks P. A Validated Bioluminescence-Based Assay for the Rapid Determination of the Initial Rate of Kill for Discovery Antimalarials. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72 (3), 717–726. 10.1093/jac/dkw449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ullah I.; Sharma R.; Mete A.; Biagini G. A.; Wetzel D. M.; Horrocks P. D. The Relative Rate of Kill of the MMV Malaria Box Compounds Provides Links to the Mode of Antimalarial Action and Highlights Scaffolds of Medicinal Chemistry Interest. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75 (2), 362–370. 10.1093/jac/dkz443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Makler M. T.; Hinrichs D. J. Measurement of the Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity of Plasmodium falciparum as an Assessment of Parasitemia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1993, 48 (2), 205–210. 10.4269/ajtmh.1993.48.205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gamo F.-J.; Sanz L. M.; Vidal J.; de Cozar C.; Alvarez E.; Lavandera J.-L.; Vanderwall D. E.; Green D. V. S.; Kumar V.; Hasan S.; Brown J. R.; Peishoff C. E.; Cardon L. R.; Garcia-Bustos J. F. Thousands of Chemical Starting Points for Antimalarial Lead Identification. Nature 2010, 465 (7296), 305–310. 10.1038/nature09107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smilkstein M.; Sriwilaijaroen N.; Kelly J. X.; Wilairat P.; Riscoe M. Simple and Inexpensive Fluorescence-Based Technique for High-Throughput Antimalarial Drug Screening. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48 (5), 1803–1806. 10.1128/AAC.48.5.1803-1806.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zenno S.; Koike H.; Tanokura M.; Saigo K. Gene Cloning, Purification, and Characterization of NfsB, a Minor Oxygen-Insensitive Nitroreductase from Escherichia coli, Similar in Biochemical Properties to FRase I, the Major Flavin Reductase in Vibrio Fischeri. J. Biochem. 1996, 120 (4), 736–744. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sedgwick A. C.; Hayden A.; Hill B.; Bull S. D.; Elmes R. B. P.; James T. D. A Simple Umbelliferone Based Fluorescent Probe for the Detection of Nitroreductase. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2018, 12 (2), 311–314. 10.1007/s11705-017-1697-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shi Y.; Zhang S.; Zhang X. A Novel Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probe for Selectively Sensing Nitroreductase (NTR) in an Aqueous Medium. Analyst 2013, 138 (7), 1952–1955. 10.1039/c3an36807f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang M.; Wang C.; Otto T. D.; Oberstaller J.; Liao X.; Adapa S. R.; Udenze K.; Bronner I. F.; Casandra D.; Mayho M.; Brown J.; Li S.; Swanson J.; Rayner J. C.; Jiang R. H. Y.; Adams J. H. Uncovering the Essential Genes of the Human Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum by Saturation Mutagenesis. Science 2018, 360 (6388), eaap7847 10.1126/science.aap7847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shoemark D. K.; Cliff M. J.; Sessions R. B.; Clarke A. R. Enzymatic Properties of the Lactate Dehydrogenase Enzyme from Plasmodium falciparum. FEBS J. 2007, 274 (11), 2738–2748. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05808.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baragaña B.; Hallyburton I.; Lee M. C. S.; Norcross N. R.; Grimaldi R.; Otto T. D.; Proto W. R.; Blagborough A. M.; Meister S.; Wirjanata G.; Ruecker A.; Upton L. M.; Abraham T. S.; Almeida M. J.; Pradhan A.; Porzelle A.; Luksch T.; Martínez M. S.; Bolscher J. M.; Woodland A.; Norval S.; Zuccotto F.; Thomas J.; Simeons F.; Stojanovski L.; Osuna-Cabello M.; Brock P. M.; Churcher T. S.; Sala K. A.; Zakutansky S. E.; Jiménez-Díaz M. B.; Sanz L. M.; Riley J.; Basak R.; Campbell M.; Avery V. M.; Sauerwein R. W.; Dechering K. J.; Noviyanti R.; Campo B.; Frearson J. A.; Angulo-Barturen I.; Ferrer-Bazaga S.; Gamo F. J.; Wyatt P. G.; Leroy D.; Siegl P.; Delves M. J.; Kyle D. E.; Wittlin S.; Marfurt J.; Price R. N.; Sinden R. E.; Winzeler E. A.; Charman S. A.; Bebrevska L.; Gray D. W.; Campbell S.; Fairlamb A. H.; Willis P. A.; Rayner J. C.; Fidock D. A.; Read K. D.; Gilbert I. H. A Novel Multiple-Stage Antimalarial Agent That Inhibits Protein Synthesis. Nature 2015, 522 (7556), 315–320. 10.1038/nature14451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie S. C.; Griffin M. D. W.; Winzeler E. A.; Ribas de Pouplana L.; Tilley L. Targeting Aminoacyl tRNA Synthetases for Antimalarial Drug Development. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 77, 111–129. 10.1146/annurev-micro-032421-121210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Le Manach C.; Scheurer C.; Sax S.; Schleiferböck S.; Cabrera D. G.; Younis Y.; Paquet T.; Street L.; Smith P.; Ding X. C.; Waterson D.; Witty M. J.; Leroy D.; Chibale K.; Wittlin S. Fast In Vitro Methods to Determine the Speed of Action and the Stage-Specificity of Anti-Malarials in Plasmodium falciparum. Malar. J. 2013, 12 (1), 424 10.1186/1475-2875-12-424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murithi J. M.; Owen E. S.; Istvan E. S.; Lee M. C. S.; Ottilie S.; Chibale K.; Goldberg D. E.; Winzeler E. A.; Llinás M.; Fidock D. A.; Vanaerschot M. Combining Stage Specificity and Metabolomic Profiling to Advance Antimalarial Drug Discovery. Cell Chem. Biol. 2020, 27 (2), 158–171.e3. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y.; Sun Y.; Li J.; Su Q.; Yuan W.; Dai Y.; Han C.; Wang Q.; Feng W.; Li F. Ultrasensitive Near-Infrared Fluorescence-Enhanced Probe for In Vivo Nitroreductase Imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (19), 6407–6416. 10.1021/jacs.5b04097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chevalier A.; Zhang Y.; Khdour O. M.; Kaye J. B.; Hecht S. M. Mitochondrial Nitroreductase Activity Enables Selective Imaging and Therapeutic Targeting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (37), 12009–12012. 10.1021/jacs.6b06229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Copp J. N.; Mowday A. M.; Williams E. M.; Guise C. P.; Ashoorzadeh A.; Sharrock A. V.; Flanagan J. U.; Smaill J. B.; Patterson A. V.; Ackerley D. F. Engineering a Multifunctional Nitroreductase for Improved Activation of Prodrugs and PET Probes for Cancer Gene Therapy. Cell Chem. Biol. 2017, 24 (3), 391–403. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hall B. S.; Bot C.; Wilkinson S. R. Nifurtimox Activation by Trypanosomal Type I Nitroreductases Generates Cytotoxic Nitrile Metabolites. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286 (15), 13088–13095. 10.1074/jbc.M111.230847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkinson S. R.; Taylor M. C.; Horn D.; Kelly J. M.; Cheeseman I. A Mechanism for Cross-Resistance to Nifurtimox and Benznidazole in Trypanosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105 (13), 5022–5027. 10.1073/pnas.0711014105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hammerich M.; Schütt C.; Stähler C.; Lentes P.; Röhricht F.; Höppner R.; Herges R. Heterodiazocines: Synthesis and Photochromic Properties, Trans to Cis Switching within the Bio-Optical Window. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (40), 13111–13114. 10.1021/jacs.6b05846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joung J. F.; Han M.; Jeong M.; Park S. Experimental Database of Optical Properties of Organic Compounds. Sci. Data 2020, 7 (1), 295 10.1038/s41597-020-00634-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simeonov A.; Jadhav A.; Thomas C. J.; Wang Y.; Huang R.; Southall N. T.; Shinn P.; Smith J.; Austin C. P.; Auld D. S.; Inglese J. Fluorescence Spectroscopic Profiling of Compound Libraries. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51 (8), 2363–2371. 10.1021/jm701301m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Carvalho L. P.; Niepoth E.; Mavraj-Husejni A.; Kreidenweiss A.; Herrmann J.; Müller R.; Knaab T.; Burckhardt B. B.; Kurz T.; Held J. Quantification of Plasmodium falciparum HRP-2 as an Alternative Method to [3H]Hypoxanthine Incorporation to Measure the Parasite Reduction Ratio In Vitro. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2023, 62 (3), 106894 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chakraborty S.; Sakka M.; Kimura T.; Sakka K. Cloning and Expression of a Clostridium kluyveri Gene Responsible for Diaphorase Activity. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2008, 72 (3), 735–741. 10.1271/bbb.70606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Komatsuya K.; Sakura T.; Shiomi K.; O̅mura S.; Hikosaka K.; Nozaki T.; Kita K.; Inaoka D. K. Siccanin is a Dual-Target Inhibitor of Plasmodium falciparum Mitochondrial Complex II and Complex III. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15 (7), 903 10.3390/ph15070903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trager W.; Jensen J. B. Human Malaria Parasites in Continuous Culture. Science 1976, 193 (4254), 673–675. 10.1126/science.781840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tougan T.; Suzuki Y.; Itagaki S.; Izuka M.; Toya Y.; Uchihashi K.; Horii T. An Automated Haematology Analyzer XN-30 Distinguishes Developmental Stages of Falciparum Malaria Parasite Cultured In Vitro. Malar. J. 2018, 17 (1), 59 10.1186/s12936-018-2208-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lambros C.; Vanderberg J. P. Synchronization of Plasmodium falciparum Erythrocytic Stages in Culture. J. Parasitol. 1979, 65 (3), 418–420. 10.2307/3280287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





