Skip to main content
Discover Oncology logoLink to Discover Oncology
. 2024 Dec 18;15:786. doi: 10.1007/s12672-024-01665-y

Essential thrombocytosis transformed AML with TP53 mutations and its clinical implications

Yang Si 1,#, Jiyuan Wang 2,#, Brett D Hambly 3, Yuli Wang 1,, Yanfang Zhang 1,, Shisan Bao 1,
PMCID: PMC11655794  PMID: 39692923

Abstract

Essential thrombocytosis (ET) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm. There is a rare possibility of its transformation from ET into acute myeloid leukemia (AML). While the TP53 mutation is a well-known risk factor for AML, limited research exists regarding ET patients who develop AML with TP53 mutations. Among three ET transformed AML patients, two exhibited TP53 mutations, with an increased number of AML cells. Conversely, the third ET patient who transformed to AML without TP53 mutations had a lower burden of AML cells. The patients with TP53 mutations had shorter survival times compared to that without mutations, in response to decitabine treatment. In contrast, the patient with ET transformed AML without TP53 mutations showed a better response to decitabine. The ET transformed AML without TP53 mutations patient exhibited a survival period exceeding 20 months. ET patients who develop AML with a high allelic burden of TP53 mutations may experience a more aggressive disease progression and severe complications compared to AML patient without TP53 mutations. Our report sheds light on the distinct clinical presentations of ET patients who develop AML, characterized by different TP53 mutations and varying therapeutic outcomes when treated with decitabine. However, further studies that include a larger quantity of samples are needed to elucidate the precise underlying molecular mechanisms involved in this process.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12672-024-01665-y.

Keywords: Essential thrombocytosis, Acute myeloid leukemia, Transformation, Prognosis

Highlights

What is the new aspect of your work?

The new aspect of our current study is that AML transformed ET with TP53 mutation appears to have a worse prognosis than without TP53 mutations, partly due to a higher tumor load of white blood cells.

What is the central finding of your work?

There is a poor outcome for ET transformed AML with TP53 mutations despite the addition of demethylation therapy or other traditional chemotherapy.

What is (or could be) the specific clinical relevance of your work?

We hypothesise that TP53 mutations lead to a poor prognosis in ET transformed AML, although a clinical trial of arsenic trioxide may demonstrate an improvement in the response of the patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12672-024-01665-y.

Introduction

Essential thrombocytosis (ET) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by an overproduction of platelets. It is typically associated with specific genetic mutations, including Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) V617F, calreticulin (CALR), or thrombopoietin receptor (MPL) mutations [1]. Common complications of ET include transient ischemic attacks, ocular migraines, erythromelalgia, and acquired von Willebrand’s disease. ET is considered the least aggressive form of MPN, but there is a rare possibility of transformation into acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [1]. The incidence of leukemic transformation among ET patients is low, ranging from 0.5 to 1% per year within the first ten years following diagnosis [24]. Unfortunately, the prognosis for patients who undergo AML transformation is generally extremely unfavorable, with most individuals succumbing to the disease within a few months [24].

As the MPN progresses, genes relevant to the transformation into AML undergo further mutations, leading to clonal evolution. This process is considered a key factor in the pathogenesis of AML, yet the precise mechanisms underlying these mutations and their association with the transformation of ET to AML require further investigation [5]. It has been established that TP53 mutation is a significant risk factor for AML [69] and has been inversely correlated with AML prognosis. The progression from ET to AML involves hematopoietic stem cell disorders that acquire clonal evolution [6, 1012] and is accompanied by gene mutations such as TP53, ASXL1, and IDH [6, 1014]. However, the specific genes that regulate this transformation remain unclear [11, 15]. Despite extensive clinical and basic research conducted over several decades to identify potential therapeutic targets for novel drugs, the management of AML resulting from ET transformation remains a subject of debate [4, 11, 12, 16].

This report presents the clinical and laboratory findings of three patients with ET who underwent transformation into AML. Notably, two of the patients had TP53 mutations with a high variant allele frequency (VAF), and exhibited a particularly poor prognosis, while the third patient did not have any TP53 mutations and exhibited a better prognosis. These data lead us to hypothesize that the presence of TP53 mutations with a high VAF may lead to a poorer prognosis during AML transformation from ET.

Patients

From January 2012 to May 2023, three individuals undergoing their annual health checkup were identified to have abnormal peripheral blood profiles, exhibiting significantly elevated platelet counts. Following this discovery, these patients were subsequently referred to the Department of Haematology at The Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine. Upon evaluation, these individuals presented with severe thrombocytosis, characterized by markedly elevated platelet counts ranging from 926 to 1031 × 109/L. Additionally, bone marrow biopsies revealed the presence of megakaryocytes with hyperlobulated nuclei, further supporting the diagnosis. This study has received approval from the Ethics Committee at The Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai, China and is in accordance with The Declaration of Helsinki guidelines and regulations. Consent to Participate and Consent to Publish were obtained from all participants. In addition, all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Results

The diagnosis and management of these patients followed The Management Recommendations from The European LeukemiaNet [17].

Case 1: A 64-year-old male patient presented with an abnormal full blood count during a routine annual checkup, prompting referral to the Hematology Department. Upon further evaluation, the patient was diagnosed with ET based on bone marrow biopsy findings, and the presence of a CALR gene mutation along with a high platelet count (926 × 109/L). WBC in case 1 was 53.34?×?109/L. No TP53 mutations were identified at this time, using the NGS method, as described [18] (Supl Table S3). The patient underwent treatment with interferon (IFN) without experiencing any adverse events, including thrombotic events, resulting in one year of remission following treatment. However, during regular monthly consultations with the Hematology Department, an abnormal full blood count (leucocytosis 53.34 × 109/L) was detected one year after the initial ET diagnosis. Subsequently, a second bone marrow biopsy was performed, confirming the development of AML.

The biopsy indicated the presence of a TP53 p.V172A mutation (with a VAF of 51.3%), in addition to the previously identified CALR mutation, which had not changed since the diagnosis of ET. The TP53 mutation (p.V172A) is a missense mutation that has been observed in several solid tumors [19] (Genomic Mutation ID: COSV52683521), but has not previously been seen in AML, based on extensive online searches, including COSMIC. Consequently, we cannot confirm that it is pathogenic or that it was the cause of the AML.

Notably, no abnormal chromosomal karyotype was observed prior to or after the development of AML. The patient received immediate treatment with D-HA chemotherapy regimens (including decitabine, homoharringtonine, and cytarabine) upon AML diagnosis. Unfortunately, despite the treatment, the patient passed away within seven days. Consequently, this patient’s response is not evaluable due to early mortality.

Case 2: A 61 year-old male patient was referred to the Department of Hematology after an abnormal full blood count was detected. Following a bone marrow biopsy, the patient was diagnosed with ET without any gene mutations. The bone marrow morphology showed megakaryocytic hyperplasia, but no dysplasia/ringed sideroblasts. A MPN/MDS diagnostic panel, that including testing for TP53 mutations, was used for genetic testing in China [20]. Treatment with hydroxyurea led to remission, and the patient underwent regular monthly consultations for routine checkups. However, seven years after achieving remission, the patient visited the Department of Hematology complaining of fatigue. A routine evaluation revealed an extreme abnormality in the full blood count, characterized by markedly elevated white blood cell counts (96.28 × 109/L) with 94% blast cells, as well as severe anemia with a hemoglobin level of 54 g/L. Immediate bone marrow biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of AML. The biopsy revealed the presence of TP53 p.Y220C (with a VAF of 43.3%) and TP53 p.H179R mutations (with a VAF of 48.5%). The two TP53 mutations (p.H179R and Y220C) are missense mutations that have been observed in AML, based on extensive online searches, including COSMIC [19] (Genomic Mutation ID: COSV52661282; Genomic Mutation ID COSV52661712). Unfortunately, re-testing of the initial ET sample was not performed. Additionally, chromosomal karyotyping demonstrated a 45,XY,−3,del(4)(q21),?add(5)(q13),−7,+mar [4] mutation. The addition of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) would provide more solid evidence in the current diagnosis, however, it was not routinely performed. We will investigate in more depth in future. D-HA chemotherapy, consisting of decitabine, homoharringtonine, and cytarabine, was initiated as the treatment approach. Unfortunately, despite receiving this therapy, the patient did not respond, and succumbed to the heavy burden of leukemic cells within three days. Consequently, this patient’s response is not evaluable due to early mortality.

Case 3: A 74-year-old female patient was referred to the Department of Hematology following an abnormal full blood count. Subsequent bone marrow biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of ET with a JAK2 V617F positive gene mutation. The VAF was not determined at this time. Megakaryocyte system hyperplasia was active, while hyperplasia within the erythrocyte system was absent. The patient achieved remission after receiving treatment with hydroxyurea. She underwent routine follow-up for nearly seven years until leukocytopenia (white blood cell count of 1.2 × 109/L) was observed, leading to a second bone marrow biopsy. The biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of AML, with the presence of both a JAK2 V617F mutation (VAF 3.4%) and an IDH2 mutation (VAF 2.3%). Notably, no abnormal chromosomal karyotype was observed prior to or after the development of AML. Considering the unique transformation and the patient’s overall health condition, a different chemotherapy regimen consisting of decitabine, aclarubicin, homoharringtonine, and cytarabine was administered. This treatment resulted in remission for 14 months. However, the patient subsequently became unable to tolerate further therapy. As a result, palliative care was provided, but unfortunately, she passed away 20 months after the transformation to AML due to uncontrollable septicemia.

The detailed characteristics are presented in Supl Table S1. In addition, the laboratory tests at the diagnosis of ET (Supl Table S1) or AML (Supl Table S2, Supl Table S3) are presented.

Discussion

In our study, two patients with AML following ET transformation showed a correlation between a high allelic frequency (VAF) of TP53 mutations [21, 22]and poor prognosis, with a significant AML cell load indicated by log scale upregulation. In contrast, a third ET-transformed AML patient lacked TP53 mutations and displayed a low AML cell burden. The lack of any response in patients 1 and 2 with high allelic frequency TP53 mutations looks like intrinsic resistance may be due to a lack of apoptotic signaling rather than an indirect effect of TP53 mutations on, say, aneuploidy, with an increased chance of the selection for genetic drug resistance. We hypothesize that ET-transformed AML patients with high TP53 mutation allelic frequency may experience more aggressive disease progression and severe complications compared to those without TP53 mutations.

A correlation between TP53 mutation allelic frequency [69] and poorer prognosis in AML has been reported, though TP53’s role in AML development due to ET transformation is unclear [9]. TP53 mutations aren’t generally considered driver mutations for MPN or ET but are found in around 2% of MPN patients [23] and are often treatment-related in MPN-to-AML transformation [24]. Epigenetic changes can also affect TP53 function [23].

All three ET-transformed AML patients initially received decitabine, the first-line treatment for older AML patients with TP53 mutations [5, 8, 15, 25]. However, those with TP53 mutations showed poor responses and died within days, while the patient without TP53 mutations responded well, achieving 14 months of remission. Additional drugs (aclarubicin and homoharringtonine) were used to counter resistance, as decitabine lacks rapid tumor-killing effects. Leukapheresis wasn’t available, and hydroxyurea was given as supportive care.

Arsenic trioxide can restore function in mutated p53 via a hidden allosteric site [26], suggesting that patients with TP53 mutations (such as p.V172A, p.Y220C, and p.H179R in our cases) might benefit from this treatment, potentially to be explored in clinical trials. Unfortunately, the two ET-transformed AML patients in our study did not survive long enough to complete a decitabine course. This raises questions about the optimal first-line treatment for ET-transformed AML patients with high-allelic frequency TP53 mutations, especially elderly ones. Should decitabine remain the preferred option, or should arsenic trioxide be considered as an alternative?

The 2017 NCCN guidelines [27] for AML recommended decitabine as the preferred first-line treatment but did not endorse combining it with aclarubicin, homoharringtonine, or cytarabine, as was done in these cases. By 2022, the guidelines updated to suggest combining a hypomethylating agent like decitabine with venetoclax. Thus, findings from these cases should be interpreted with caution, as the treatment regimens used were not part of standard recommendations.

While venetoclax is now standard for older AML patients [28, 29], TP53 mutations may confer resistance to it [30, 31], and studies show no significant benefit of combining venetoclax with decitabine in TP53-mutated AML patients. In our study, early mortality in two cases with TP53-mutated secondary AML raises questions about whether chemotherapy or venetoclax-based therapies should be used, and suggests that alternative treatments may be more appropriate for future trials.

At the time of admission, venetoclax wasn’t yet authorized by the national health board in China, and rapid disease progression limited treatment options. In one case, venetoclax could have been added due to an IDH2 mutation, but financial constraints made it inaccessible.

The third ET-transformed AML patient, without TP53 mutations, responded well to decitabine, suggesting that TP53 mutations may impact AML patients’ response to this drug. However, prior studies show that decitabine effectively reduces blast cells in primary AML patients, regardless of TP53 mutation status [32]. Additionally, research by Papaemmanuil et al. associates TP53 mutations with poor AML prognosis [6], emphasizing TP53’s role in AML progression. Differences between our findings and theirs may stem from distinct mechanisms in primary versus ET-transformed AML with TP53 mutations, highlighting the need for further research on TP53-related pathways in ET-transformed AML.

In our cases, patients with high TP53 mutation allelic frequency showed no response to decitabine, possibly due to intrinsic resistance linked to impaired apoptotic signaling rather than indirect effects like aneuploidy-driven drug resistance. Among these patients, two had a normal karyotype, while one exhibited a complex chromosomal profile, aligning with previous studies linking chromosome del 7q to transformation [33]. These findings underscore the limitations of chromosomal analysis alone in managing ET-transformed AML and suggest a need for additional molecular and genetic testing.

A VAF near 50% implies the TP53 mutation is clonal in nearly all AML cells, possibly reflecting a strong selection for TP53 subclones within the ET clone. Thus, the timing of TP53 mutation emergence and its allelic frequency may be crucial in understanding transformation to AML.

This study has several limitations. Due to the rarity of ET-transformed AML, the analysis included only three patients, making it primarily hypothesis-generating and underscoring the need for further research. A prospective study could allow for additional analyses, including in vitro or animal models, to deepen molecular insights. For example, sensitive TP53 mutation analysis in initial samples could clarify if these mutations arise de novo in the AML phase. Examining other co-occurring mutations in both ET and AML stages may also reveal their role in disease progression.

From these three cases, we hypothesize that ET-transformed AML with high TP53 mutation allelic frequency may be more aggressive and involve more severe complications than AML without TP53 mutations. Our findings highlight the unique clinical profile of ET-transformed AML, involving distinct TP53 mutations and varied responses to decitabine. Further studies in larger cohorts are needed to explore the molecular mechanisms behind these observations and validate these preliminary findings.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the support from the staff of Department of Hematology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital.

Author contributions

Yang Si: made substantial contributions to the conception, wrote paper; Jiyuan Wang: collected data and wrote the paper; Brett Hambly: revised the paper; Yuli Wang: revised the paper; Yanfang Zhang: revised the paper; Shisan Bao: conception and revised the paper.

Funding

There is no financial support for the current study.

Data availability

These data are available statement: The information for this study was collected from three patients using the electronic database of the Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to security and privacy issue for both the patients and the hospital, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Yang Si and Jiyuan Wang contributed equally.

Contributor Information

Yuli Wang, Email: wangyuli23@163.com.

Yanfang Zhang, Email: zhangyanfang20@163.com.

Shisan Bao, Email: profbao@hotmail.com.

References

  • 1.Spivak JL. Myeloproliferative neoplasms. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2168–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Passamonti F, Rumi E, Pungolino E, et al. Life expectancy and prognostic factors for survival in patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Am J Med. 2004;117:755–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kiladjian JJ, Rain JD, Bernard JF, Briere J, Chomienne C, Fenaux P. Long-term incidence of hematological evolution in three French prospective studies of hydroxyurea and pipobroman in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2006;32:417–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wolanskyj AP, Schwager SM, McClure RF, Larson DR, Tefferi A. Essential thrombocythemia beyond the first decade: life expectancy, long-term complication rates, and prognostic factors. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:159–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Prokocimer M, Molchadsky A, Rotter V. Dysfunctional diversity of p53 proteins in adult acute myeloid leukemia: projections on diagnostic workup and therapy. Blood. 2017;130:699–712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Papaemmanuil E, Gerstung M, Bullinger L, Gaidzik VI, Paschka P, Roberts ND, et al. Genomic classification and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2209–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Döhner H, Estey E, Grimwade D, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 2017;129(4):424–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Ley TJ, Miller C, et al. Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2059–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wong TN, Ramsingh G, Young AL, et al. Role of TP53 mutations in the origin and evolution of therapy-related acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2015;518(7540):552–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Medinger M, Passweg JR. Acute myeloid leukaemia genomics. Br J Haematol. 2017;179(4):530–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ayres-Silva JP, Bonamino MH, Gouveia ME, et al. Genetic alterations in essential thrombocythemia progression to acute myeloid leukemia: a case series and review of the literature. Front Oncol. 2018;8:32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lundberg P, Karow A, Nienhold R, et al. Clonal evolution and clinical correlates of somatic mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2014;123:2220–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rampal R, Ahn J, Abdel-Wahab O, Nahas M, Wang K, Lipson D, et al. Genomic and functional analysis of leukemic transformation of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:E5401–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Harutyunyan A, Klampfl T, Cazzola M, Kralovics R. p53 lesions in leukemic transformation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:488–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ohgami RS, Ma L, Merker JD, Gotlib JR, Schrijver I, Zehnder JL, et al. Next-generation sequencing of acute myeloid leukemia identifies the significance of TP53, U2AF1, ASXL1, and TET2 mutations. Mod Pathol. 2015;28:706–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Abdulkarim K, Girodon F, Johansson P, Maynadié M, Kutti J, Carli P-M, et al. AML transformation in 56 patients with Ph–MPD in two well defined populations. Eur J Haematol. 2009;82:106–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tiziano Barbui G, Barosi G, Birgegard, et al. Philadelphia-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: critical concepts and management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(6):761–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shinichi Takano M, Fukasawa M, Kadokura H, Shindo E, Takahashi S, Hirose S, Maekawa K, Mochizuki H, Kawaida J, Itakura R, Katoh, H Fujii, T Sato, N Enomoto. Next-generation sequencing revealed TP53 mutations to be malignant marker for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms that could be detected using pancreatic juice. Pancreas. 2017;46(10):1281–1287. 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000931 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 19.Sondka Z, et al. COSMIC: a curated database of somatic variants and clinical data for cancer. Nucl Acid Res. 2024. 10.1093/nar/gkad986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Enjeti AK, et al. Panel-based gene testing in myelodysplastic/ myeloproliferative neoplasm overlap syndromes: Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) consensus statement. Pathology. 2022;54(4):389–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bernard E, Nannya Y, Hasserjian RP, et al. Implications of TP53 allelic state for genome stability, clinical presentation and outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat Med. 2020;26(10):1549–56. 10.1038/s41591-020-1008-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Weinberg OK, Siddon A, Madanat YF, et al. TP53 mutation defines a unique subgroup within complex karyotype de novo and therapy- related MDS/AML. Blood Adv. 2022;6(9):2847–53. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Greenfield G, McMullin MF, Mills K. Molecular pathogenesis of the myeloproliferative neoplasms. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Xie M, Lu C, Wang J, McLellan MD, Johnson KJ, Wendl MC, McMichael JF, Schmidt HK, Yellapantula V, Miller CA, Ozenberger BA, Welch JS, Link DC, Walter MJ, Mardis ER, Dipersio JF, Chen F, Wilson RK, Ley TJ, Ding L. Age-related mutations associated with clonal hematopoietic expansion and malignancies. Nat Med. 2014;20(12):1472–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Welch JS, PettI AA, Miller CA, et al. TP53 and decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(21):2023–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen S, Wu JL, Liang Y, et al. Arsenic trioxide rescues structural p53 mutations through a cryptic allosteric site. Cancer Cell. 2021;39:225–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.O’Donnell MR, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia, version 3.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15(7):926–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.DiNardo CD, Pratz KW, Letai A, et al. Safety and preliminary efficacy of venetoclax with decitabine or azacitidine in elderly patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukaemia: a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1b study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:216–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.DiNardo CD, Jonas BA, Pullarkat V, et al. Azacitidine and venetoclax in previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:617–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang YW, Tsai CH, Lin CC, et al. Cytogenetics and mutations could predict outcome in relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia patients receiving BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax. Ann Hematol. 2020;99:501–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.DiNardo CD, Tiong IS, Quaglieri A, et al. Molecular patterns of response and treatment failure after frontline venetoclax combinations in older patients with AML. Blood. 2020;135:791–803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kim K, Maiti A, Loghavi S, Pourebrahim R, Kadia TM, Rausch CR, Furudate K, Daver NG, Alvarado Y, Ohanian M, Sasaki K, Short NJ, Takahashi K, Yilmaz M, Tang G, Ravandi F, Kantarjian HM, DiNardo CD, Konopleva MY. Outcomes of TP53-mutant acute myeloid leukemia with decitabine and venetoclax. Cancer. 2021;127(20):3772–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Shimizu A, Takenaka K, Ohata S, et al. Transformation of acute myeloid leukemia with deletion of chromosome 7q and additional abnormalities in chromosome 8 in a patient with essential thrombocythemia. Case Rep Oncol. 2021;14(1):217–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

These data are available statement: The information for this study was collected from three patients using the electronic database of the Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to security and privacy issue for both the patients and the hospital, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Discover Oncology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES