Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2024 Nov 12;206(12):e00399-24. doi: 10.1128/jb.00399-24

Identification and characterization of the Bacillus subtilis spore germination protein GerY

Fernando H Ramírez-Guadiana 1, Anna P Brogan 1, David Z Rudner
Editor: Tina M Henkin2
PMCID: PMC11656775  PMID: 39530705

ABSTRACT

In response to starvation, endospore-forming bacteria differentiate into stress-resistant spores that can remain dormant for years yet rapidly germinate and resume growth when nutrients become available. To identify uncharacterized factors involved in the exit from dormancy, we performed a transposon-sequencing screen taking advantage of the loss of spore heat resistance that accompanies germination. We reasoned that transposon insertions that impair but do not block germination will lose resistance more slowly than wild type after exposure to nutrients and will therefore survive heat treatment. Using this approach, we identified most of the known germination genes and several new ones. We report an initial characterization of 15 of these genes and a more detailed analysis of one (ymaF). Spores lacking ymaF (renamed gerY) are impaired in germination in response to both L-alanine and L-asparagine, D-glucose, D-fructose, and K+. GerY is a soluble protein synthesized under σE control in the mother cell. A YFP-GerY fusion localizes around the developing and mature spore in a manner that depends on CotE and SafA, indicating that it is a component of the spore coat. Coat proteins encoded by the gerP operon and gerT are also required for efficient germination, and we show that spores lacking two or all three of these loci have more severe defects in the exit from dormancy. Our data are consistent with a model in which GerY, GerT, and the GerP proteins are required for efficient transit of nutrients through the coat to access the germination receptors, but each acts independently in this process.

IMPORTANCE

Pathogens in the orders Bacillales and Clostridiales resist sterilization by differentiating into stress-resistant spores. Spores are metabolically inactive and can remain dormant for decades, yet upon exposure to nutrients, they rapidly resume growth, causing food spoilage, food-borne illness, or life-threatening disease. The exit from dormancy, called germination, is a key target in combating these important pathogens. Here, we report a high-throughput genetic screen using transposon sequencing to identify novel germination factors that ensure the efficient exit from dormancy. We identify several new factors and characterize one in greater detail. This factor, renamed GerY, is part of the proteinaceous coat that encapsulates the dormant spore. Our data suggest that GerY enables efficient transit of nutrients through the coat to trigger germination.

KEYWORDS: sporulation, dormancy, germination, coat

INTRODUCTION

Bacteria in the Bacillales and Clostridiales orders cause over a million infections annually and lead to significant financial losses in the food industry (1, 2). These pathogens can withstand diverse sterilization regimes by forming stress-resistant spores. While spores are metabolically inactive and can remain dormant for decades, they quickly resume growth upon exposure to nutrients, leading to food spoilage, food-borne illness, or severe diseases. Germination, the process by which spores exit dormancy, is a crucial target for combating these pathogens. Most spore-forming bacteria follow a common germination program involving a series of chemical steps catalyzed by a small set of conserved factors (3, 4). GerA family receptors in the spore membrane detect germinants, usually amino acids, sugars, or nucleosides. These receptors are ligand-gated ion channels and trigger ion release from the spore core upon detection of specific germinants (5). Ion release activates the SpoVA (Spo5A) transport complex, which releases dipicolinic acid (DPA) as a Ca2+ chelate from the spore (6, 7). Cell wall hydrolases, one of which is activated by DPA, then degrade the specialized peptidoglycan that encases the spore, enabling core rehydration, macromolecular synthesis, and resumption of growth (3, 4).

In addition to these broadly conserved factors that play central roles in spore germination, there is a set of genes that have been implicated in this process based on their requirement for efficient exit from dormancy. Only a subset of these factors has been characterized in detail. GerD is a lipoprotein that is required to cluster the germination receptors in the spore membrane (8). In its absence, germination occurs more slowly (9). SpoVAF and FigP form a membrane complex that releases ions in response to ion release by the germinant receptors (10, 11). Spores lacking this complex release ions more slowly and are delayed in the exit from dormancy. Finally, the gerT gene and the gerP locus that encode GerT and six GerP proteins (GerPA, PB, PC, PD, PE, and PF) are also required for efficient germination (12, 13). These proteins are produced in the mother cell and are part of the proteinaceous coat that surrounds the dormant spore (14). The current thinking is that these proteins enable efficient transit of nutrients across the coat, and in their absence, germination initiates more slowly. Recently, it was found that DUF421-containing proteins YetF and YdfS, which are produced in the developing spore, are required for normal germination kinetics (15). The molecular basis for the delay in germination in their absence is currently unknown. Similarly, studies focused on the YhcN family of spore lipoproteins that includes YhcN, YlaJ, YutC, and YrbB found these proteins to be required for timely germination (16, 17). The mechanism by which they promote efficient germination remains to be elucidated.

Finally, a recent high-throughput screen, in which spores from a transposon library were incubated with L-valine for 60 min and the spores that had not germinated were enriched by density gradient centrifugation, identified a collection of mutants that were delayed in germination (18). A subset of the factors identified in this screen was characterized further. Mutant spores lacking many of these genes appeared to reduce the levels of the germinant receptor GerA, which responds to L-valine. Thus, most of these factors were proposed to indirectly affect germination. Interestingly, although gerD, spoVAF, figP (yqhR), and the gerP locus were identified in this screen, gerT was not, suggesting the screen was not saturating.

Here, we performed a complementary transposon-insertion sequencing (Tn-seq) screen, in which we exposed spores from a transposon library to germinants and heat killed the germinated spores at various time points afterward. We then germinated the resistant spores on LB agar plates and collected the resulting colonies. Using this method, we identified a set of mutants with impaired germination that partially overlapped with the set reported in the original Tn-seq screen (18). We performed an initial characterization of 15 of these genes and a more detailed analysis of one (ymaF). We report that YmaF (renamed GerY) is a broadly conserved coat protein produced in the mother cell under SigE control. Spores lacking this coat protein are impaired in germination. We show that spores lacking several other inner and outer coat proteins have little impact on germination, arguing for more specialized roles for GerP, GerT, and GerY. Importantly, the removal of the spore coat largely suppressed the germination defects of ∆gerP, ∆gerT, and ∆gerY mutants. Our data are consistent with the model that GerY, like GerT and GerP, promotes efficient transit of germinants across the spore coat but that these factors act independently in this process.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

General methods

Bacillus subtilis strains were derived from the auxotrophic trpC2 168 strain (19). Sporulation was induced at 37°C by nutrient exhaustion in supplemented DS medium (DSM) (20) or by resuspension according to the method of Sterlini and Mandelstam (21). Sporulation efficiency was determined in 24–30 h cultures as the total number of heat-resistant (80°C for 20 min) colony-forming units (CFUs) compared to wild-type heat-resistant CFUs. Insertion-deletion mutants were from the Bacillus knockout (BKE) collection (22) or were generated by isothermal assembly (23) and direct transformation into B. subtilis. All BKE mutants were backcrossed twice into B. subtilis 168 before assaying and prior to antibiotic cassette removal. Antibiotic cassette removal was performed using a temperature-sensitive plasmid that constitutively expresses Cre recombinase (24). Tables of genes enriched for transposon insertions in the germination screens (Table S1), strains (Table S2), plasmids (Table S3), and oligonucleotide primers (Table S4), and a description of strains and plasmids construction can be found in the supplemental material.

Transposon-insertion sequencing

Tn-seq was performed as described previously (25). Briefly, a diverse transposon library was washed in DSM medium and diluted in 50 mL DSM to an OD600 of 0.03 and grown at 37°C. A sample was harvested at the onset of starvation (input), and the culture was allowed to sporulate for 36 h. The spore-containing culture was washed six times with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), resuspended in ddH2O, heat activated at 70°C for 30 min, and then placed on ice for 20 min. The spore suspension was divided into three pools, each at OD600 of 2. Pool 1 was mixed with an equal volume of L-alanine (100 µM, final concentration). Pool 2 was mixed with an equal volume of AGFK (10 mM, final concentration of each component). Pool 3 was mixed with an equal volume of water. The mixtures with L-alanine and AGFK were divided into two glass test tubes and agitated at 37°C for 20 and 60 min (L-alanine) or 40 and 80 min (AGFK). The mixture lacking germinant was agitated at 37°C for 60 min. At the indicated times, each germination reaction was incubated at 80°C for 20 min to kill vegetative cells and germinated spores. The mixtures were then spread on LB agar plates. Furthermore, ~1,000,000 colonies from each condition were separately pooled. A fraction of the L-alanine (60 min) and AGFK (80 min) pools was used to inoculate 50 mL DSM. The resulting spores were subjected to a second round of 60-min (L-alanine) and 80-min (AGFK) germination, heat-kill, and plating. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from the pooled colonies from each condition. The gDNA was treated with the endonuclease MmeI, followed by adapter ligation. Transposon-chromosome junctions were PCR amplified in 18 cycles, and the products were gel purified and sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq platform using TruSeq reagents (Tufts University TUCF Genomics facility). Reads were mapped to the B. subtilis 168 genome (NCBI NC_000964.3), tallied at each TA site, and genes in which reads were statistically overrepresented were identified using the Mann-Whitney U test. Visual inspection of transposon insertion profiles was performed with the Sanger Artemis Genome Browser and Annotation tool (26). Some of the genes listed in Table S1 that were chosen for further characterization were based on visual inspection of the insertion profiles despite having a P-value >0.05 and/or a fold-enrichment of less than 3.

Spore preparation and purification

Spores generated by nutrient exhaustion on DSM agar plates were harvested after 96 h of incubation at 37°C. Spores were scraped off the plate, washed four times with ddH2O, and resuspended in 350 µL of 20% Histodenz. The spore suspension was then loaded on top of 1 mL of 50% Histodenz in a microfuge tube and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 35 min to separate dormant phase-bright spores from vegetative cells, germinated phase-dark spores, and cell debris. The pellet containing the denser dormant spores was washed five times with ddH2O and resuspended in 1 mL of ddH2O. Spores were stored at 4°C and assayed for germination within 4 days.

Germination assays

Purified spores were diluted in ddH2O to an OD600 of 1, heat activated at 70°C for 30 min followed by incubation on ice for 20 min. Furthermore, 100 µL of the spore suspension was transferred to a clear, flat-bottom 96-well plate, and an equal volume of L-alanine (100 µM, 1 mM, or 10 mM, final concentrations), AGFK (10 mM, final concentration of each component), or ddH2O was added. The OD600 was recorded every 2 min for 3 h using an Infinite M Plex plate reader (Tecan). The 96-well plate was maintained at 37°C with constant agitation between measurements. Germination kinetics were analyzed in technical triplicate, and the values were averaged. All germination assays reported are representative of experiments that were performed on at least two biological replicates.

Chemical decoating of spores

Spores at an OD600 of 25 were resuspended in 1 mL decoating solution (0.1 M DTT, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 0.1 M NaCl, and 0.5% SDS) and incubated at 37°C for 90 min with vigorous vortexing at 15-min intervals (12). The spores were then pelleted and washed 10 times with ice-cold ddH2O.

Microscopy

Sporulating cells induced by the resuspension method were collected by centrifugation at 8,500 × g for 1 min and immobilized on 2% agarose pads. Phase-contrast microscopy was performed using an Olympus BX61 microscope equipped with an UplanF1 100× phase contrast objective and a monochrome CoolSnapHQ digital camera (Photometrics). Membranes were stained with 1-(4-trimethylammoniumphenyl)-6-phenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene p-toluenesulfonate (TMA-DPH; Molecular Probes) at a final concentration of 50 µM. Exposure times were 200, 400, and 1,000 ms for TMA-DPH, GFP, and YFP, respectively. Image analysis and processing were performed using MetaMorph software.

Immunoblot analysis

Purified spores were resuspended in 500 µL 1× PBS containing phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (1 mM final concentration). The spore suspension was transferred to 2 mL tubes containing Lysing Matrix B (MP Biomedicals) and chilled on ice. The spores were then ruptured mechanically using FastPrep (MP Biomedicals) at 6.5 m/s for 1 min. Immediately after lysis, 500 µL of 2× Laemmli sample buffer containing 10% β-mercaptoethanol was added to the tube. After centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 20 min, the supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube, and total protein was determined using a non-interfering protein assay (G-Biosciences). Protein concentrations were normalized, and ~10 µg of protein was separated by SDS-PAGE on 17.5% resolving gels, electroblotted onto Immobilon-P-membranes (Millipore), and blocked in 5% non-fat milk in 1× PBS-0.5% Tween 20. The blocked membranes were probed with anti-GerAA (1:5,000) (27), anti-GerBC (1:5,000) (28), and anti-GerKA (1:10,000) (28) diluted in 3% BSA in PBS with 0.5% Tween-20. Primary antibodies were detected using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit antibodies (1:20,000) (Bio-Rad) and the Western Lightning ECL Reagents Kit (PerkinElmer). The figure showing the levels of the germinant receptors is representative of experiments that were performed on two biological replicates.

RESULTS

A screen for mutants that are delayed in spore germination

To investigate whether there were additional uncharacterized genes required for spore germination, we performed a transposon-sequencing (Tn-seq) screen taking advantage of the loss of heat resistance that accompanies the exit from dormancy. We reasoned that after exposure to nutrients, spores with transposon insertions in genes that are required for efficient germination would remain heat resistant for a longer period of time compared to spores with insertions in unrelated genes. Accordingly, if a Tn mutant library of dormant spores is briefly exposed to nutrients and then immediately incubated at 80°C for 20 min, only the spores that had not yet germinated will survive. The surviving spores can then be enriched by plating on rich medium to promote germination and outgrowth.

We generated a mariner transposon library containing ~130,000 unique insertions (53% of all possible TA sites in the B. subtilis genome were hit ≥10 times). The library was sporulated by nutrient exhaustion in liquid sporulation medium. At the onset of starvation, a sample was removed, and the remaining culture was sporulated for 36 h. The resulting spores were washed and then incubated at 70°C for 30 min followed by 20 min on ice to promote synchronous spore germination. The culture was divided into three and separately mixed with ddH2O, L-alanine (100 µM, final concentration), or a mixture of L-asparagine, D-glucose, D-fructose, and K+ (AGFK) at a final concentration of 10 mM for each component. The mixtures were then incubated at 37°C for 60 min (ddH2O), 20 and 60 min (L-alanine), or 40 and 80 min (AGFK) to induce germination. At the indicated times, the mixtures were incubated at 80°C for 20 min to kill germinated spores and vegetative cells. The cultures were then plated on LB agar plates and incubated at 37°C overnight (Fig. 1A). Heat-resistant spores that were impaired but not blocked in germination formed colonies by the following morning. Furthermore, >1,000,000 colonies from each condition were separately pooled, and a fraction of this pool was subject to a second round of enrichment. Genomic DNA from the pooled colonies from each condition and enrichment was isolated, and the transposon insertion sites and their abundance were determined by transposon sequencing. The Tn insertion profiles for each condition were compared to one another and to the profile from the library at the onset of starvation.

Fig 1.

The diagram demonstrates the Bacillus subtilis germination process using transcription. The flowchart illustrates the stages of sporulation, heat-kill, sequencing, and mapping. Graphs show gene insertions under different treatments.

A genetic enrichment combined with transposon sequencing identifies new germination factors. (A) Schematic of the enrichment screen. A B. subtilis transposon library was sporulated in liquid medium. A sample was collected at the onset of starvation (not shown). The spore-containing culture was washed, divided into three, and incubated with ddH2O, L-alanine, or AGFK to induce germination. After 60 min, the cultures were incubated at 80°C for 20 min to kill germinated spores and non-sporulated (vegetative) cells. The cultures were then plated on LB agar. Spores that did not germinate prior to heat-kill survived (light blue ovals) and formed colonies. Colonies from each condition were separately pooled. A fraction of the L-ala and AGFK mixtures was subjected to a second round of sporulation, germination, heat-kill, and plating (not shown). The transposon insertion sites were identified by deep sequencing and mapped to the B. subtilis 168 reference genome. (B) Transposon insertion profiles from five regions of the B. subtilis genome are depicted. Red boxes highlight gerD, ymaF, yodN, ydgB, and yqeF that were significantly enriched (P < 0.05) for transposon insertions after two rounds of sporulation and germination with L-ala and AGFK compared to water. Each vertical line indicates an insertion site, and the height represents the number of sequencing reads. The maximum number of reads shown is indicated in each panel. Additional insertion profiles can be found in Fig. S1.

As anticipated, transposon insertions in the gerA operon required for germination in response to L-alanine (29) were highly enriched in the screen with L-alanine (Fig. S1A). As can be seen in Fig. S1A, transposons in this locus were enriched after 20-min incubation with L-alanine, and the enrichment increased further after 60 min and even more so after the second round of enrichment (>17-fold) (Table S1). By contrast, the transposon insertion profile across the gerK locus, which is required for germination in response to AGFK but not L-alanine (30), was unchanged after incubation with L-alanine under all conditions tested (Fig. S1A). Reciprocally, insertions in the gerK locus were enriched in the presence of AGFK (Fig. S1B). Unexpectedly, insertions in the gerA locus were also enriched in the AGFK condition, suggesting that the absence of the GerA receptor reduces or slows the response of spores to AGFK, at least under the conditions used for the screen. Finally, as can be seen in Fig. 1, insertions in the germination gene gerD that is required for efficient germination (9) were enriched for L-alanine- and AGFK-induced germination (Fig. 1B), further validating the approach. We identified 15 genes that were significantly (P-value ≤0.05) enriched in transposon insertions when the spore Tn library was induced to germinate with L-alanine compared to water. The fold-enrichment for these genes was ≥3.9 (Table S1). A total of 29 genes were significantly (P-value ≤0.05; fold-enrichment ≥3.9) overrepresented in transposon insertions when the spore library was induced to germinate with AGFK compared to water. In total, we identified 43 genes, of which 26 have been previously found to impair germination when mutated (Table S1). Figure 1B shows the transposon insertion profiles of four genes identified in our screen (ymaF, yodN, ydgB, yqeF). ymaF and yqeF were among the genes identified in the earlier Tn-seq screen (18). ymaF was not validated or characterized, but an initial characterization of yqeF was performed (18). yodN and ydgB were not previously implicated in germination.

Initial characterization of putative germination factors

We generated in-frame deletions in 26 of the hits in our screen, including all 14 new ones, and tested them for germination in response to L-alanine and AGFK. Of these mutants, 21 were impaired in germination, although most were modestly delayed (Table S1; Fig. S2). Four of the mutants from our screen (∆ymaF, ∆yodN, ∆ydgB, and ∆yqeF) had more pronounced germination delays (Fig. 2). Importantly, all four mutants could be complemented in trans, indicating the absence of these genes was responsible for the defect rather than a polar effect on a neighboring gene. Interestingly, ∆ydgB spores were only delayed in germination in response to AGFK; and ∆yqeF spores were only delayed in response to L-alanine (Fig. 2; Fig. S3). The other two mutants (∆ymaF and ∆yodN) were impaired in germination in response to both germinants (Fig. 2; Fig. S3).

Fig 2.

Line graphs showing germination assays of wild-type and mutant Bacillus subtilis spores for four genes ymgF, yodN, ydgB, and yqeF in response to L-alanine and AGFK. The graph illustrates the reduction in optical density over time.

YmaF, YodN, YdgB, and YqeF are required for efficient spore germination. Germination assays of wild-type (WT), ∆ymaF, ∆yodN, ∆ydgB, and ∆yqeF spores in response to L-alanine or AGFK as assessed by the percent reduction in OD600 over time. Purified spores from the indicated strains were incubated with the germinant indicated at 37°C, and the drop in optical density was monitored over time. The germination defect of all four mutants could be complemented in trans. Representative data from one of three biological replicates are shown. Error bars indicate ±SD of three technical replicates.

The previous germination Tn-seq study that identified and characterized new germination factors found that, in most cases, the delay in germination could be explained by a reduction in the levels of the GerA receptor that responds to L-alanine and L-valine (18). Accordingly, we investigated the levels of the germinant receptors in spores from eight mutants from our screen, including ∆ymaF, ∆yodN, ∆ydgB, and ∆yqeF. Of these, only ∆yqeF was analyzed in the previous study. We purified spores from each mutant and generated lysates. Identical amounts of total protein were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblot using anti-GerAA, -GerBC, and -GerKA antisera. In virtually all cases, the levels of the germinant receptor proteins were within 10% of wild type (Fig. S4). We tentatively conclude that the defects in spore germination are not due to a reduction in the levels of these receptors. Consistent with this idea, five of the eight genes tested are predicted to be expressed in the mother cell compartment and would therefore be unlikely to impact the levels of the germination receptors that are produced in the developing spore.

Characterization of YmaF, YodN, YdgB, and YqeF

Because spores lacking ymaF, yodN, ydgB, or yqeF had the strongest defects in spore germination among the hits from our screen, we characterized these factors further. Based on transcriptional profiling experiments, YmaF, YdgB, and YodN are predicted to be produced in the mother cell under the control of SigE, SigK, and GerE, respectively (3133). The yqeF gene lacks a sporulation-specific promoter and is predicted to be transcribed by SigA (34). To experimentally validate these predictions, we generated promoter fusions to yfp and analyzed YFP fluorescence in a sporulation time course (Fig. S5). Sporulating cells harboring the PymaF-yfp reporter exhibited fluorescence in the mother cell at an early stage of sporulation (Fig. 3A; Fig. S5). Cells lacking SigE failed to activate the reporter, while ∆sigK-sporulating cells produced YFP in the mother cell (Fig. S6), consistent with the transcriptional profiling studies (3133). Sporulating cells that contained the PydgB-yfp reporter had mother cell fluorescence at a late stage in sporulation that depended on SigK, while sporulating cells with PyodN-yfp produced YFP in the mother cell under the control of GerE at a very late stage in sporulation (Fig. 3A; Fig. S5 and S6). Thus, all three of these proteins are specifically produced in the mother cell compartment at different stages during spore maturation. By contrast, cells harboring the PyqeF-yfp reporter had weak YFP fluorescence at the onset of sporulation, and the signal remained low throughout sporulation (Fig. 3A; Fig. S5). These data support the idea that YqeF is produced during vegetative growth and is not under sporulation control. Based on our characterization of ymaF , we have renamed this gene gerY.

Fig 3.

Microscopy images showing YFP fusion protein localization during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis strains for four genes ymaF, ydgB, yodN, yqeF. Panels A and B compare YFP, membrane/YFP, and phase-contrast images.

YmaF, YodN, and YdgB are synthesized in the mother cell during sporulation. (A) Representative images of sporulating strains harboring the indicated yfp fusion to the promoters of ymaF, yodN, ydgB, and yqeF. The sporulation time point (in hours) that was visualized for each strain is indicated in the low right corner of the YFP image. A sporulation time course for each strain can be found in Fig. S5. (B) Representative images of sporulating cells harboring YFP fusions to YmaF or YdgB. The sporulation time point (in hours) that was visualized for each strain is indicated in the low right corner of the YFP image. The membranes (false-colored red) were stained with the fluorescent dye TMA-DPH and merged with the YFP signal (false-colored green). Scale bars indicate 2 µm.

Next, we investigated where the proteins localize. We generated yfp fusions to each of the four genes and placed them under the control of their native promoters. However, we could only detect signal for two of the four proteins. YFP-GerY (YmaF) was enriched around the developing spore but was also present in the mother cell cytosol (Fig. 3B; Fig. S5). YdgB-YFP localized in puncta around the forespore (Fig. 3B; Fig. S5). We conclude that GerY, YdgB, and YodN are produced in the mother cell at different stages of spore development and that GerY and YdgB localize to the exterior of the spore, consistent with a potential role for these factors in spore germination.

GerY is a coat protein

To cast the widest net for mutants impaired in spore germination, we used a low concentration of L-alanine (100 µM) in our germination Tn-seq screen. To characterize gerY more thoroughly, we performed germination assays on ∆gerY spores using 100 µM, 1 mM, and 10 mM L-alanine. For comparison, we selected 11 other mutants identified in our screen and 3 well-characterized germination mutants (∆gerD, ∆gerT, and ∆gerP) (9, 12, 13) and performed germination assays under the same conditions. As anticipated, the germination defects for all 15 mutants were less pronounced with increasing concentration of L-alanine (Fig. 4A; Fig. S7). Nonetheless, several of the mutants, including ∆gerY, resembled the germination kinetics of the ∆gerP mutant (Fig. 4A; Fig. S7). Thus, several of these factors are likely to be bona fide germination factors.

Fig 4.

Germination assays and microscopy images of Bacillus subtilis mutants. Line graphs show optical density reduction for wild-type and mutant spores. YFP/GFP fusions to Ger proteins are captured in microscopy images.

GerY is a coat protein. (A) Germination assays with a range of L-alanine concentrations. Purified spores from the indicated strains were incubated with L-alanine at 37°C, and the drop in optical density was monitored over time. (B) Representative images of purified spores harboring fluorescent fusions to GerT, GerPA, and GerY. In the absence of SafA or CotE, YFP-GerY and GerT-GFP are not retained in the spore coat. Scale bar indicates 2 µm. Spores lacking the inner coat proteins CotP, CotD, CotF (C) or the outer coat proteins CotS, CotA, CotC (D) have mild germination defects compared to wild type and ∆gerT. Purified spores from the indicated strains were incubated with 1 mM L-alanine at 37°C, and the drop in optical density was monitored over time. Representative data from one of three biological replicates are shown in panels A, C, and D. Error bars indicate ±SD of three technical replicates.

Since ∆gerY was among the strongest hits in our screen and the YFP-GerY fusion was enriched around the developing spore, we investigated whether it was retained in mature spores. As controls, we analyzed spores harboring GerT-GFP (13) and GerPA-YFP fusions. As can be seen in Fig. 4B, all three factors were localized around the dormant spore. Furthermore, we found that YFP-GerY required both SafA and CotE for its localization in mature spores, similar to what was observed for GerT-GFP (13) (Fig. 4B). By contrast, the presence of GerPA-YFP was modestly disrupted in spores lacking SafA and more substantially in the ∆cotE mutant. Altogether, these data argue that GerY, like GerP and GerT, is a coat protein.

The requirement for these coat proteins for efficient germination prompted us to investigate whether spores lacking other coat proteins might exhibit defective germination. Although our germination Tn-seq screen identified very few coat proteins, we tested three inner coat protein mutants (∆cotP, ∆cotD, and ∆cotF) and three outer coat protein mutants (∆cotA, ∆cotC, and ∆cotS) (14). All of the single mutants displayed minor defects in germination compared to wild type and the ∆gerT-positive control (Fig. 4C and D; Fig. S8). Furthermore, triple mutants lacking all three inner coat proteins or all three outer coat proteins germinated nearly as well as the single mutants (Fig. 4C and D; Fig. S8). These experiments argue that the germination defects in the ∆gerT, ∆gerP, and gerY mutants are not due to a general disruption of the coat structure and suggest that these factors play more specific roles in the process.

GerT, GerY, and GerP have distinct roles in spore germination

Next, we investigated whether GerT, GerY, and GerP function together to mediate spore germination. We generated double and triple mutants and compared spore germination to the single mutants. As can be seen in Fig. 5A, spores lacking both gerY and gerP had a more severe germination defect than the individual mutants, and spores lacking gerY and gerT were modestly more impaired than the ∆gerT single mutant. Finally, the triple mutant was the most severely impaired (Fig. 5A). These data suggest that GerY, GerP, and GerT have independent roles in spore germination rather than functioning together in a single complex. Further support for this idea comes from double-mutant analysis with a mutation in cotB, encoding an outer coat protein (35). Spores lacking cotB have a modest germination delay (Fig. 5B). However, ∆cotB had distinct genetic interactions with ∆gerT compared to ∆gerP and ∆gerY. ∆cotB partially suppressed the germination defect of ∆gerT. By contrast, the germination defect of ∆gerP and ∆gerY was enhanced in the absence of cotB (Fig. 5B). Collectively, these data argue that GerT, GerP, and GerY function independently in promoting spore germination.

Fig 5.

Bacillus subtilis spore germination tests showed that the optical density dropped over time for ger genes that were single, double, or triple mutants. Line graphs depict germination efficiency with L-alanine treatments.

GerY, GerT, and GerP function in different genetic pathways. (A) Germination assays of single, double, and triple mutants of gerY, gerT, and gerP suggest each factor functions separately to promote efficient germination. Purified spores from the indicated strains were incubated with 10 mM L-alanine at 37°C, and the drop in optical density was monitored over time. (B) Germination assays of ∆cotB in the presence and absence of gerT, gerP, or gerY suggest each factor functions separately to promote efficient germination. (C) Germination assays with spores lacking their coat indicate that the reduced germination efficiency of ∆gerT, ∆gerP, and ∆gerY spores results from defects in the spore coat. Purified spores with or without their coats were incubated with 10 mM L-alanine at 37°C, and the drop in optical density was monitored over time. Representative data from one of three biological replicates are shown. Error bars indicate ±SD of three technical replicates.

Finally, we investigated whether removing the spore coat can suppress the germination delay observed in the ∆gerY mutant, as was shown previously for ∆gerP spores (12, 36). Purified spores of all three single mutants and wild type were split into two. We chemically decoated half and left the coat on the half intact. As can be seen in Fig. 5C, decoating the spore largely suppressed the germination delays associated with spores lacking each of these factors. Collectively, these data are consistent with the model that all three proteins function to enable penetration of germinants through the coat but act independently in this process.

DISCUSSION

Here, we report the identification and characterization of a set of genes required for efficient spore germination in B. subtilis. Importantly, our Tn-seq screen and the one of Sayer and co-workers (18) identified an overlapping set of factors, suggesting the approach is robust. However, each screen also identified a subset of factors that were unique to each method. The screen of Sayer and co-workers used L-valine as the germinant (rather than L-alanine or AGFK) and separated spores that were delayed in germination from those that had germinated using density centrifugation. In addition, the screen did not involve a second round of enrichment. Consistent with the relatively minor experimental differences between the two screens, most of the mutants that were unique to each were the ones with relatively modest germination defects.

We characterized four of the genes identified in our screen in greater detail. Three of these factors (GerY, YdgB, and YodN) are produced in the mother cell at different stages of development, and one (YqeF) is expressed constitutively. While GerY and YodN are required for efficient spore germination in response to both L-alanine and AGFK, YqeF is only important in response to L-alanine and YdgB only in response to AGFK. GerY and YdgB specifically localize around the developing spore, and we show that GerY is associated with the mature spore in a manner that depends on CotE and SafA and is therefore likely to be a coat protein. Finally, our data suggest that GerY functions independently of two other coat-associated factors, GerT and GerP, that are also required for efficient germination.

The mechanisms by which GerY, GerP, and GerT promote germination are currently unknown. One hypothesis that has been suggested for the proteins encoded in the gerP operon is that they form a channel that spans the spore coat (12). Alphafold-Multimer (37) predicts that the GerP proteins assemble into a complex (Fig. S9); however, this complex does not contain a channel. Nonetheless, we envision that this protein complex promotes efficient transport across the coat by increasing the porosity of this thick proteinaceous layer (Fig. 6). Consistent with our genetic interaction data, neither GerY nor GerT is predicted to interact with the GerP complex nor with each other using AlphaFold3. Interestingly, GerY is conserved among Bacilli and Clostridia, while GerP is only present in Bacilli (Fig. S10), further supporting independent roles for these factors in spore germination. We hypothesize that GerY and GerT, like GerP, increase porosity of the coat to small molecules enabling efficient access to the germinant receptors. In the context of this model, we envision that each protein (or GerP complex) influences a distinct layer of the coat, contributing independently to the transit of germinants. The structure of the coat and the contributions of these factors to the transit of germinants await future iterations of AlphaFold and improvements in cryo-electron microscopy methods.

Fig 6.

The diagram presents a comparison between the wild-type and mutant Bacillus subtilis spores. It illustrates the structure of spore layers and how germinants transit through the spore coat to germinant receptors.

Schematic model for the role of GerY, GerT, and GerP proteins in the efficient transit of the germinants through the spore coat. Germinants (blue circles) must transit the crust, the outer and inner coat, the outer spore membrane, the cortex, and the germ cell wall to reach the germinant receptors in the inner spore membrane. GerY, GerT, and GerP are proposed to increase the porosity of the coat. In their absence, germinants are hindered in their access to the receptors.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank all members of the Bernhardt-Rudner supergroup for helpful advice, discussions, and encouragement. Special thanks to Jeremy Amon, Lior Artzi, and Yongqiang Gao for discussions about spore germination, Carlos Sanchez Isaza for help with cloning, Kumuran Ramamurthi for strains from the Losick Lab. Support for this work comes from the National Institute of Health Grants AI171308 (D.Z.R.) and AI164647 (D.Z.R.). The authors declare no competing interests. All data are available in the manuscript or in the supplementary materials.

Contributor Information

David Z. Rudner, Email: rudner@hms.harvard.edu.

Tina M. Henkin, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00399-24.

Supplemental material. jb.00399-24-s0001.pdf.

Supplemental methods, Fig. S1 to S10, and Tables S2 to S4.

jb.00399-24-s0001.pdf (9.6MB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/jb.00399-24.SuF1
Table S1. jb.00399-24-s0002.xlsx.

Genes enriched for transposon insertions in the germinations screens.

jb.00399-24-s0002.xlsx (19.9KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/jb.00399-24.SuF2

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. André S, Vallaeys T, Planchon S. 2017. Spore-forming bacteria responsible for food spoilage. Res Microbiol 168:379–387. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2016.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Mallozzi M, Viswanathan VK, Vedantam G. 2010. Spore-forming Bacilli and Clostridia in human disease. Future Microbiol 5:1109–1123. doi: 10.2217/fmb.10.60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Moir A, Cooper G. 2015. Spore germination. Microbiol Spectr 3. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TBS-0014-2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Setlow P, Wang S, Li YQ. 2017. Germination of spores of the orders Bacillales and Clostridiales. Annu Rev Microbiol 71:459–477. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-090816-093558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Gao Y, Amon JD, Artzi L, Ramírez-Guadiana FH, Brock KP, Cofsky JC, Marks DS, Kruse AC, Rudner DZ. 2023. Bacterial spore germination receptors are nutrient-gated ion channels. Science 380:387–391. doi: 10.1126/science.adg9829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Gao Y, Barajas-Ornelas RDC, Amon JD, Ramírez-Guadiana FH, Alon A, Brock KP, Marks DS, Kruse AC, Rudner DZ. 2022. The SpoVA membrane complex is required for dipicolinic acid import during sporulation and export during germination. Genes Dev 36:634–646. doi: 10.1101/gad.349488.122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Vepachedu VR, Setlow P. 2007. Role of SpoVA proteins in release of dipicolinic acid during germination of Bacillus subtilis spores triggered by dodecylamine or lysozyme. J Bacteriol 189:1565–1572. doi: 10.1128/JB.01613-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Griffiths KK, Zhang J, Cowan AE, Yu J, Setlow P. 2011. Germination proteins in the inner membrane of dormant Bacillus subtilis spores colocalize in a discrete cluster. Mol Microbiol 81:1061–1077. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07753.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Pelczar PL, Setlow P. 2008. Localization of the germination protein GerD to the inner membrane in Bacillus subtilis spores. J Bacteriol 190:5635–5641. doi: 10.1128/JB.00670-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Gao Y, Amon JD, Brogan AP, Artzi L, Ramírez-Guadiana FH, Cofsky JC, Kruse AC, Rudner DZ. 2024. SpoVAF and FigP assemble into oligomeric ion channels that enhance spore germination. Genes Dev 38:31–45. doi: 10.1101/gad.351353.123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Perez-Valdespino A, Li Y, Setlow B, Ghosh S, Pan D, Korza G, Feeherry FE, Doona CJ, Li YQ, Hao B, Setlow P. 2014. Function of the SpoVAEa and SpoVAF proteins of Bacillus subtilis spores. J Bacteriol 196:2077–2088. doi: 10.1128/JB.01546-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Behravan J, Chirakkal H, Masson A, Moir A. 2000. Mutations in the gerP locus of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus cereus affect access of germinants to their targets in spores. J Bacteriol 182:1987–1994. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.7.1987-1994.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ferguson CC, Camp AH, Losick R. 2007. gerT, a newly discovered germination gene under the control of the sporulation transcription factor sigmaK in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 189:7681–7689. doi: 10.1128/JB.01053-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Driks A, Eichenberger P. 2016. The spore coat. Microbiol Spectr 4. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TBS-0023-2016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Yu B, Kanaan J, Shames H, Wicander J, Aryal M, Li Y, Korza G, Brul S, Kramer G, Li YQ, Nichols FC, Hao B, Setlow P. 2023. Identification and characterization of new proteins crucial for bacterial spore resistance and germination. Front Microbiol 14:1161604. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1161604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Flores MJ, Duricy K, Choudhary S, Laue M, Popham DL. 2023. A family of spore lipoproteins stabilizes the germination apparatus by altering inner spore membrane fluidity in Bacillus subtilis spores. J Bacteriol 205:e0014223. doi: 10.1128/jb.00142-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Johnson CL, Moir A. 2017. Proteins YlaJ and YhcN contribute to the efficiency of spore germination in Bacillus subtilis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 364. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sayer CV, Barat B, Popham DL. 2019. Identification of L-Valine-initiated-germination-active genes in Bacillus subtilis using Tn-seq. PLoS ONE 14:e0218220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Zeigler DR, Prágai Z, Rodriguez S, Chevreux B, Muffler A, Albert T, Bai R, Wyss M, Perkins JB. 2008. The origins of 168, W23, and other Bacillus subtilis legacy strains. J Bacteriol 190:6983–6995. doi: 10.1128/JB.00722-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Schaeffer P, Millet J, Aubert JP. 1965. Catabolic repression of bacterial sporulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 54:704–711. doi: 10.1073/pnas.54.3.704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Sterlini JM, Mandelstam J. 1969. Commitment to sporulation in Bacillus subtilis and its relationship to development of actinomycin resistance. Biochem J 113:29–37. doi: 10.1042/bj1130029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Koo BM, Kritikos G, Farelli JD, Todor H, Tong K, Kimsey H, Wapinski I, Galardini M, Cabal A, Peters JM, Hachmann AB, Rudner DZ, Allen KN, Typas A, Gross CA. 2017. Construction and analysis of two genome-scale deletion libraries for Bacillus subtilis. Cell Syst 4:291–305. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.12.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Gibson DG. 2011. Enzymatic assembly of overlapping DNA fragments. Meth Enzymol 498:349–361. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385120-8.00015-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Meeske AJ, Sham LT, Kimsey H, Koo BM, Gross CA, Bernhardt TG, Rudner DZ. 2015. MurJ and a novel lipid II flippase are required for cell wall biogenesis in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:6437–6442. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504967112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Meeske AJ, Rodrigues CDA, Brady J, Lim HC, Bernhardt TG, Rudner DZ. 2016. High-throughput genetic screens identify a large and diverse collection of new sporulation genes in Bacillus subtilis. PLoS Biol 14:e1002341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Carver T, Harris SR, Berriman M, Parkhill J, McQuillan JA. 2012. Artemis: an integrated platform for visualization and analysis of high-throughput sequence-based experimental data. Bioinformatics 28:464–469. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ramirez-Peralta A, Zhang P, Li YQ, Setlow P. 2012. Effects of sporulation conditions on the germination and germination protein levels of Bacillus subtilis spores. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:2689–2697. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07908-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Stewart K-AV, Yi X, Ghosh S, Setlow P. 2012. Germination protein levels and rates of germination of spores of Bacillus subtilis with overexpressed or deleted genes encoding germination proteins. J Bacteriol 194:3156–3164. doi: 10.1128/JB.00405-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Moir A, Lafferty E, Smith DA. 1979. Genetics analysis of spore germination mutants of Bacillus subtilis 168: the correlation of phenotype with map location. J Gen Microbiol 111:165–180. doi: 10.1099/00221287-111-1-165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Atluri S, Ragkousi K, Cortezzo DE, Setlow P. 2006. Cooperativity between different nutrient receptors in germination of spores of Bacillus subtilis and reduction of this cooperativity by alterations in the GerB receptor. J Bacteriol 188:28–36. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.1.28-36.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Eichenberger P, Fujita M, Jensen ST, Conlon EM, Rudner DZ, Wang ST, Ferguson C, Haga K, Sato T, Liu JS, Losick R. 2004. The program of gene transcription for a single differentiating cell type during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. PLoS Biol 2:e328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Eichenberger P, Jensen ST, Conlon EM, van Ooij C, Silvaggi J, González-Pastor JE, Fujita M, Ben-Yehuda S, Stragier P, Liu JS, Losick R. 2003. The sigmaE regulon and the identification of additional sporulation genes in Bacillus subtilis. J Mol Biol 327:945–972. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00205-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Steil L, Serrano M, Henriques AO, Völker U. 2005. Genome-wide analysis of temporally regulated and compartment-specific gene expression in sporulating cells of Bacillus subtilis. Microbiol (Reading, Engl) 151:399–420. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27493-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Nicolas P, Mäder U, Dervyn E, Rochat T, Leduc A, Pigeonneau N, Bidnenko E, Marchadier E, Hoebeke M, Aymerich S, et al. 2012. Condition-dependent transcriptome reveals high-level regulatory architecture in Bacillus subtilis. Science 335:1103–1106. doi: 10.1126/science.1206848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Donovan W, Zheng LB, Sandman K, Losick R. 1987. Genes encoding spore coat polypeptides from Bacillus subtilis. J Mol Biol 196:1–10. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90506-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Butzin XY, Troiano AJ, Coleman WH, Griffiths KK, Doona CJ, Feeherry FE, Wang G, Li Y, Setlow P. 2012. Analysis of the effects of a gerP mutation on the germination of spores of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 194:5749–5758. doi: 10.1128/JB.01276-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, Tunyasuvunakool K, Bates R, Žídek A, Potapenko A, et al. 2021. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature New Biol 596:583–589. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material. jb.00399-24-s0001.pdf.

Supplemental methods, Fig. S1 to S10, and Tables S2 to S4.

jb.00399-24-s0001.pdf (9.6MB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/jb.00399-24.SuF1
Table S1. jb.00399-24-s0002.xlsx.

Genes enriched for transposon insertions in the germinations screens.

jb.00399-24-s0002.xlsx (19.9KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/jb.00399-24.SuF2

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES